rx_popindex signature is incorrect in the pre-patch example.
--- rx.ops.old 2003-06-06 18:27:00.0 +0200
+++ rx.ops 2003-10-20 23:08:24.0 +0200
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
rx_literal S0, I1, b, $next
branch $top
$backtrack:
-
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since this has come up again, ...
[ FYI: I was starting implementing this, based on a general traverse
vtable with callback functions. Two patches got backed out by
Dan after some discussion in PM ]
... and it's apparent that the last time
Stéphane Payrard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rx_popindex signature is incorrect in the pre-patch example.
- rx_popindex S0, I1, $advance
+ rx_popindex I1, $advance
Thanks, changed.
leo
hello,
I was trying to debug the t/src tests, and realized that doing by hand
what Parrot::Test::c_output_(is|like) does is not really easy.
I wanted to compile the source code embedded in t/src/sprintf.t (the
third test, in my case) to see exactly where and how it was failing, and
possibly have
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:27:34PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:24:03AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Not to mention that it's buggy as hell. For example, in various versions
of Perl I've used there have been rather serious bugs in the regex engine
when taint
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:05:38PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:34:38PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:16:40PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
I wrote database in quotes because currently we are talking about a
flat file, written using
Tim Bunce wrote:
p.s. Could someone suggest a pure-perl module with lots of tests as
a suitable testbed for Devel::Cover?
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Acme-EyeDrops has 22 test programs,
769 tests and no dependencies.
/-\
http://personals.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Personals
New people, new
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:38:48PM +1000, Andrew Savige wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
p.s. Could someone suggest a pure-perl module with lots of tests as
a suitable testbed for Devel::Cover?
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Acme-EyeDrops has 22 test programs,
769 tests and no dependencies.
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) Freezing at the destruction level may *not* use any additional memory
for object traversal
This is a really hard problem. In some early experiments with
destruction ordering (one of the problems wich need iteration) I
didn't get around with
Last week i send this:
I spent the last day getting parrot running under Borland. The
attached patch is whats need to get linking and running make test on
both Windows/Borland and Linux/gcc. I'm not sure if its ready for
inclusion in the tree, but I want some feedback on the approach.
No
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 04:38 PM 10/20/2003 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
The encoding methods for freezing (and corresponding decoding methods for
thawing) may be overridden to provide an alternate serialization format.
The only requirement of the serialziation format is
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
the xml header is only for the top level thing in the serialized
tree. if it is nonstandard you have to mark the serialized string so you
can call the matching thaw methods. each object in the serialized tree
will have to support that method or
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since this has come up again, ...
[ FYI: I was starting implementing this, based on a general traverse
vtable with callback functions. Two patches got backed out by
Dan after some discussion in
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 08:21 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I find the notion of an XML header a bit confusing, given Dan's
statement to the effect that it was a throw to XML folks.
I think anything XML folks will be interested in will entail
After thinking about this a bit, it became glaringly obvious that the
right way to instantiate an object for class Foo is to do:
new P5, .Foo
Or whatever the constant value assigned to the Foo class upon its creation
is. When a class is created, it should be assigned a number, and for most
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[ thaw ]
This should IMHO be able to create constant PMCs out of metadata, e.g.
for subroutine objects. So there should be some means to tell thaw() to
create PMC(s) in the constant_pmc_pool.
There should be
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After thinking about this a bit, it became glaringly obvious that the
right way to instantiate an object for class Foo is to do:
new P5, .Foo
Or whatever the constant value assigned to the Foo class upon its creation
is. When a class is created, it
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[ thaw ]
This should IMHO be able to create constant PMCs out of metadata, e.g.
for subroutine objects. So there should be some means to tell thaw() to
create
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After thinking about this a bit, it became glaringly obvious that the
right way to instantiate an object for class Foo is to do:
new P5, .Foo
Or whatever the constant value assigned to the Foo class
Try:
new P0, 'std::array' # PMC
new P1, 'Perl::PerlArray'# PMC (or class)
new P2, 'Package::SomeClass' # Class
At compile time the string can be converted to an integer enumerator.
-Melvin
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/21/2003 10:24 AM
Please respond to lt
To:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Albeit I'm not convinced, that we can't have a seen hash.
A seen hash most likely would:
1) Kill GC performance especially in pathological cases. The GC
should be quiet and invisible.
2) Cause memory usage to double upon a mark run.
-Melvin
While we're fighting^Wdiscussing the freezing system, there's a simpler
thing we need to have added in. We need an API entry point that allows C
code to invoke a sub/method PMC. This needs to be done both for the
embedding API (we'll wrap it) where the embedding app will call in, but
also for
On Oct 21, 2003, at 7:14 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
After thinking about this a bit, it became glaringly obvious that the
right way to instantiate an object for class Foo is to do:
new P5, .Foo
Or whatever the constant value assigned to the Foo class upon its
creation
is. When a class is
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The chill and warm runtime methods take a PMC or a frozen representation
of a PMC (respectively) and provide a human readable version of that PMC.
I dunno, why chill() is superior to dump() or pretty_print(), but the
name doesn't really
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The chill and warm runtime methods take a PMC or a frozen representation
of a PMC (respectively) and provide a human readable version of that PMC.
I dunno, why chill() is superior to dump()
On Oct 21, 2003, at 5:53 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Note that I do *not* want to have multiple object traversal systems
in
parrot! We have one for DOD, and proposals have ranged upwards from
there.
No. That is *not* happening--the chance for error is significant, the
side-effects of the error
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we're fighting^Wdiscussing the freezing system, there's a simpler
thing we need to have added in. We need an API entry point that allows C
code to invoke a sub/method PMC.
What about params? I already thought about that a bit, and when looking
at
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
You can append items to the constant table. You can't declare existing
items as constant, because you can't change the underlying object pool,
where the object was allocated. This would change the objects
Melvin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Albeit I'm not convinced, that we can't have a seen hash.
A seen hash most likely would:
1) Kill GC performance especially in pathological cases. The GC
should be quiet and invisible.
2) Cause memory usage to double upon a mark run.
GC isn't
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we're fighting^Wdiscussing the freezing system, there's a simpler
thing we need to have added in. We need an API entry point that allows C
code to invoke a sub/method PMC.
What about params? I already
On Oct 21, 2003, at 6:12 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 08:21 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I find the notion of an XML header a bit confusing, given Dan's
statement to the effect that it was a throw to XML folks.
I think anything XML folks
Yeah, if you're just needing to tag the stream with a label to indicate
the type plus a version number, then xml's on the one hand overkill and
on the other hand not necessarily a big help to xml proponents.
So, in a nutshell, throwing an XML format type tag at the beginning buys
us nothing
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 12:53 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Yeah, if you're just needing to tag the stream with a label to indicate
the type plus a version number, then xml's on the one hand overkill and
on the other hand not necessarily a big help to
On Oct 21, 2003, at 10:41 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 12:53 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Yeah, if you're just needing to tag the stream with a label to
indicate
the type plus a version number, then xml's on the one hand overkill
and
on the other hand not necessarily a big help
*sigh*
I'm long overdue for a rant.
I'm very happy with the progress Parrot has made, but that is because I
took a year off. Otherwise, it would have been like watching a pot
waiting for it to boil.
However, some things have not changed, like us.
We try to tackle too many NEW large
On Oct 21, 2003, at 10:49 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 12:53 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Yeah, if you're just needing to tag the stream with a label to
indicate
the type plus a version number, then xml's on the one hand
overkill and
on the
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 13:49 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
Hmmm... maybe as an optimilization, something that would fit in 4 or
8 bytes would be better for the magic string (so a single or double
integer check
At 08:21 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I find the notion of an XML header a bit confusing, given Dan's
statement to the effect that it was a throw to XML folks.
I think anything XML folks will be interested in will entail
*wrapping* stuff, not *prefixing* it.
Nah, I expect what they'll
# New Ticket Created by Nick Kostirya
# Please include the string: [perl #24260]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24260
[PATCH] to build under win32
1. MS compiler do not support struct with empty
# New Ticket Created by Nick Kostirya
# Please include the string: [perl #24261]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24261
cmd.exe of WinNT do not convert t\src\*.t into list files.
# New Ticket Created by Nick Kostirya
# Please include the string: [perl #24262]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24262
cmd.exe of WinNT do not convert t\src\*.t into list files.
At 12:53 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Yeah, if you're just needing to tag the stream with a label to indicate
the type plus a version number, then xml's on the one hand overkill and
on the other hand not necessarily a big help to xml proponents.
So, in a nutshell, throwing an XML
At 13:49 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
Yep. But mainly I think because you'll need to encode binary data to
make it valid XML. That's on overhead you don't to suffer for those
serialization that don't need it.
I had it in mind that the
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
You know we already have two versions of pobject_lives lying around.
Then we need to fix that, too.
One is with ARENA_DOD_FLAGS one w/o. If you are trying to implement your
universal mark() for everything, one
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, in a nutshell, throwing an XML format type tag at the beginning buys
us nothing regardless of whether it's an XML stream or not?
Yes. That's what people say :)
What about a well known format called PBC. (Parrot bortable^Wbyte code :)
It knows about
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
1) Serialization traversals need to take note of logical int and
float slots
That's not an issue for us. A PMC is responsible for serializing itself,
so if its got a string, float, or int component then it must
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
This is my list, not Dan's so he may disagree:
The list is a valid one, and the complaint is real. We've been taking
things out of order in part because it works for me, but I've got a bigger
picture than anyone else and that's not necessarily a great
Nick Kostirya (via RT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cmd.exe of WinNT do not convert t\src\*.t into list files.
D:\CvsProjects\parrotnmake test
D:\Programs\Perl\bin\perl.exe t\harness t\src\*.t
t\src\*t\src\*.t does not exist
FAILED--1 test script could be run, alas--no output
Here's the scoop:
Metadata for classes is simple. In PIR/assembly, they're noted with
.things:
.class Foo
.is bar
.is baz
.does some_thing
.member x
.member y
.member z
.ssalc
Unless someone tells me that ssalc is horribly obscene in some relatively
common language,
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:24:03AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Andrew Savige wrote:
I noticed in Test::Tutorial:
Taint mode is a funny thing. It's the globalest of all global features.
Once you turn it on it effects all
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Anyway, my taint mode experience has been that random things break in very
weird ways when using it.
I'd guess that many extensions don't handle magic properly.
Extension authors rarely add the extra logic, even if they know
what
--- Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll look into SQLite.
I'd caution against rushing in any particular direction without some
profiling information to back it up.
Having said that, I'd strongly recommend switching to Storable first.
It did have problems but it's now very robust and
On Oct 15, 2003, at 4:52 AM, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
I spent the last day getting parrot running under Borland. The
attached patch is whats need to get linking and running make test on
both Windows/Borland and Linux/gcc. I'm not sure if its ready for
inclusion in the tree, but I want some
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Clark C. Evans wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:12:27AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
| We're talking about the first thing in a file (or stream, or whatever). I
| was under the impression that XML files should be entirely composed of
| valid XML, hence the need for the
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Clark C. Evans wrote:
If you are going to go this far (including content-length) may I
just suggest using a MIME envelope? This has several advantages:
This is a very good idea, but not this time, as it's too easy to get stuck
in the endless churn of very good ideas and
Okay, since nobody took advantage of the, oh, at lesat 2 or 3 minutes
since the metadata spec post, here's the equivalent for assembly. I'll
stub in and commit the stubbed object.ops ops in a bit.
We've already got ops to create a class standalone, and to subclass an
existing class. We're also
At 15:18 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Clark C. Evans wrote:
If you are going to go this far (including content-length) may I
just suggest using a MIME envelope? This has several advantages:
This is a very good idea, but not this time, as it's too easy to get stuck
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
| If you ask me, you could do easy with a simple header line like:
|
| parrot xml 1.0
| \0
|
| basically magic word ('parrot')
| followed by a space
| followed by the type
| followed by a space
| followed by version
|
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Clark C. Evans wrote:
Back to the YAML list... sorry for interloping!
Ah, you weren't interloping--it is a good idea. You just managed to come
in on the other side of Good Enough today. :)
Dan
Dan/Elizabeth,
Thank you for considering my response, let me rephrase and then
I'll go back to my own list (*grins*).
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:25:48PM +0200, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
| At 15:18 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
| On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Clark C. Evans wrote:
| If you are
At 12:56 -0700 10/21/03, Clark C. Evans wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:25:48PM +0200, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
| At 15:18 -0400 10/21/03, Dan Sugalski wrote:
| On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Clark C. Evans wrote:
| If you are going to go this far (including content-length) may I
| just suggest
All~
Dan Sugalski wrote:
To add or remove an implemented interface:
adddoes Px, Sy
removedoes Px, Sy
Instantiate, as implemented, is dead. I'm going to nuke it, then use it
for instantiating classes via metadata chunks. That's next message.
Just a thought, but (add/remove)interface seems a
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Anyway, my taint mode experience has been that random things break in very
weird ways when using it.
All the more reason to test with it on. :)
--
Michael G Schwern[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Do not
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Anyway, my taint mode experience has been that random things break in very
weird ways when using it.
All the more reason to test with it on. :)
Given the differences in behaviour with taint mode, it seems
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Here's the scoop:
Metadata for classes is simple. In PIR/assembly, they're noted with
.things:
.class Foo
.is bar
.is baz
.does some_thing
.member x
.member y
.member z
.ssalc
Unless someone tells me that ssalc is horribly obscene in some relatively
common
At 07:44 PM 10/21/2003 -0400, Joseph Ryan wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Here's the scoop:
Metadata for classes is simple. In PIR/assembly, they're noted with
.things:
.class Foo
.is bar
.is baz
.does some_thing
.member x
.member y
.member z
.ssalc
Will there be a way to specify
At 02:55 PM 10/21/2003 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Here's the scoop:
Metadata for classes is simple. In PIR/assembly, they're noted with
.things:
.class Foo
.is bar
.is baz
.does some_thing
.member x
.member y
.member z
.ssalc
Unless someone tells me that ssalc is
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Anyway, my taint mode experience has been that random things break in very
weird ways when using it.
All the more reason to test with it on. :)
At this point I've become rather
68 matches
Mail list logo
