Re: [HACKERS] 7.4final regression failure on uw713

2003-11-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs

Re: [HACKERS] 4 Clause license?

2003-11-20 Thread Larry Rosenman
is not using BSD TCP/IP (or, at least, they didn't in their first 3 incarnations of the stack) ... M$ also bought a LARGE license from SCO... -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat

[HACKERS] help!

2003-11-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
I screwed up, and dropped a column when I shouldn't have. I have *not* vacuumed this DB yet. Is there any catalog mucking I can do to bring it back? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail

Re: [HACKERS] help!

2003-11-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, November 17, 2003 19:36:08 -0600 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I screwed up, and dropped a column when I shouldn't have. I have *not* vacuumed this DB yet. Is there any catalog mucking I can do to bring it back? Actually, I got lucky. pg_catalog.pg_attribute is what I

Re: [HACKERS] help!

2003-11-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
attention :-) ) LER Chris Larry Rosenman wrote: I screwed up, and dropped a column when I shouldn't have. I have *not* vacuumed this DB yet. Is there any catalog mucking I can do to bring it back? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length

2003-11-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
, and this time I didn't know when, exactly, SCO would make the release of the updated compiler. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp

[HACKERS] interesting SIGNAL 10 (BUSERR) on CVS

2003-11-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
] _bt_first(presumed: 0x83853d8, 0x1, 0x8385400) [0x809443e] [3] btgettuple() [0x8091fa6] debug It's a one shot, and I have a core, but, I don't have the debug symbols as UnixWare's cc doesn't allow -g and -O. Do we care? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone

Re: [HACKERS] interesting SIGNAL 10 (BUSERR) on CVS

2003-11-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, November 16, 2003 12:59:43 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I got the following: $ debug -ic -c core* /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres Warning: No debugging information in /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres Core image of postgres (process

Re: [HACKERS] interesting SIGNAL 10 (BUSERR) on CVS

2003-11-16 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, November 16, 2003 13:15:27 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it repeatable? It's hard to see how _bt_getroot() could core except maybe in the presence of serious data corruption in the index ... it happened once, and postgres did

Re: [HACKERS] Any more must fix issues for 7.4?

2003-11-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
() issue on OpenServer. LER regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail

Re: [HACKERS] Any more must fix issues for 7.4?

2003-11-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, November 13, 2003 13:18:31 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The only thing I'm aware of is the setsockopt() issue on OpenServer. We have no proposed patch for that, either, so it will also have to wait for 7.4.1. modulo

[HACKERS] REL7_4_STABLE: configure breakage?

2003-11-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
I just updated to the current REL7_4_STABLE cvs, and get a problem at line 18048 where cat isn't on the path writing the config.status file. If I add /usr/bin/ to the cat invocation, it works. What's broke? (I updated using: cvs update -rREL7_4_STABLE -P -d ) LER -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM

2003-11-10 Thread Larry Rosenman
PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp

Re: [HACKERS] Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM

2003-11-10 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, November 10, 2003 13:40:24 -0500 Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You might also look at Veritas' advisory stuff. Thanks for the suggestion -- it looks like we can make use of this. For the curious, the cache advisory API is documented

Re: [HACKERS] OSR5: Passes without the setsockopt() calls...

2003-11-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
Can I get a comment from someone on this please... LER --On Saturday, November 08, 2003 18:03:45 -0600 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From my SCO contacts re: the failure on OSR5: I haven't had time and won't have time to fully diagnose this until after i get back from vacation

[HACKERS] OSR5: Passes without the setsockopt() calls...

2003-11-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
if you're on OpenServer then don't do the setsockopt calls. Not very satisfactory as setsockopt should work on OSR5. I know this isn't an acceptable patch, and I'm not sure when my contact is back from Vacation. Do we want to hold the release? LER -- Larry Rosenman http

[HACKERS] OpenServer 5.0.7: setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY)?

2003-11-06 Thread Larry Rosenman
have ideas? Thanks, LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] OpenServer 5.0.7: setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY)?

2003-11-06 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, November 06, 2003 20:19:05 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A make check fails at createdb with errors in the postmaster logfile: LOG: setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY) failed: Protocol not available [snip] Better ask them what

Re: [HACKERS] \xDD patch for 7.5devel

2003-11-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
dependent on the assumption that the character set is ASCII. Why have you hard-coded numeric equivalents into this macro? What not ASCII compatible character sets are out there in use still today? EBCDIC as far as I know is still the default on IBM Mainframes (been 5+ years but...). -- Larry

[HACKERS] Port Report: UnixWare

2003-11-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
| 4 | 1 | four | | 5 | 0 | five | -5 == $ Can we mark UnixWare ok for 7.4 with these? Or re-write the test to NOT fail? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

[HACKERS] Regression Failure: CURRENT SOURCES/unionjoin

2003-10-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
-+---+---+---+ | 0 | | zero | | 1 | 4 | one | -1 | 2 | 3 | two | 4 + | 2 | 3 | two | 2 | 3 | 2 | three | -3 | 4 | 1 | four | | 5 | 0 | five | -5 == -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test

2003-10-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
, they cannot. It seems to me that a superuser SHOULD be able to affect ANY permissions on ANY object in the DB. [snip] -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland

[HACKERS] SCO released UP3 today... (fwd)

2003-10-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
I didn't see this come back in, so, I'm resending it. LER Forwarded Message Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 22:26:43 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: SCO released UP3 today... which means

Re: [HACKERS] Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test

2003-10-29 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, October 29, 2003 15:49:53 -0500 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --On Wednesday, October 29, 2003 15:26:39 -0500 Tom Lane=20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Is this a bug, or is it correct-per-spec behavior? It's surely likely

Re: [HACKERS] Open items

2003-10-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
way. Can anyone offer new arguments pro or con here? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Larry Rosenman

[HACKERS] Regression Test Failure/UnixWare

2003-10-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser3; SELECT testfunc1(5); -- fail ERROR: permission denied for function testfunc1 --- 247,252 == -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

[HACKERS] Port Reports: UnixWare/Failure/Priviledge Test

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
5 7.1.3 i386 x86at SCO UNIX_SVR5 $ -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
it clean and remove just -O2. We also get -g on UnixWare cc (NOT gcc) builds, which we didn't before, which means we do NOT get optimization (UnixWare's cc doesn't like -O and -g together). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 10:14:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: After further consideration, I think that the recent patch series that tried to centralize the CFLAGS handling in configure should be reverted to configure.in revision 1.293

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
== -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Larry Rosenman http

Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2003-10-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 22:29:04 +0200 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: *** ./expected/privileges.out Thu Oct 9 20:49:31 2003 --- ./results/privileges.outSat Oct 25 12:04:45 2003 *** *** 247,253 (1 row) CREATE FUNCTION

[HACKERS] Why do I get -g with this config?

2003-10-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
/local/include --with-libs=/usr/local/lib \ --with-tcl --with-tclconfig=/usr/local/lib \ --with-tkconfig=/usr/local/lib --enable-locale \ --enable-thread-safety -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

2003-10-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs

Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: [Python-Dev] HP Test Drive systems]

2003-10-09 Thread Larry Rosenman
, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-222-2783 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] expanding on syslog help

2003-09-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
cleanly -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

2003-09-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
this with a database. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[HACKERS] Link.shared help

2003-09-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
notice the problem since I have a 7.4 install in my normal prefix. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] __cpu__ defines

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
to Tom, since he seems to be the spinlock maintainer. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Need NetBSD thread tester

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
or directory $ locate pthread.h $ -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Need NetBSD thread tester

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 13:03:33 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. --On Friday, September 12, 2003 12:18:52 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need someone running NetBSD to read the top of src/tools

Re: [HACKERS] Need NetBSD thread tester

2003-09-12 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 13:30:38 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Wow, that is strange. Someone else told me NetBSD supports threads, and doesn't need any special compile flags, but of course, it has to have pthread.h to support threads. NetBSD

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
v7.4? Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If y'all care). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 23:13:54 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If y'all= =20 care). Unfixably? Or just a small oversight? I'm actually not worried about platforms

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
64-bit UnixWare. :-) (announced at SCOForum). regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Larry Rosenman http

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

2003-09-11 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:06:49 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO. Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add* an implicit #define of __i386__ should

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
416 is: int32 s_addr; s_addr is seen by the compiler as: uint32 __S_un . __S_addr ; We need to pick another name. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 12:52:18 -0700 Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Sunday, September 07, 2003 20:22:30 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] /usr/local/bin/gmake -C libpq all gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/postgres

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 713 probs

2003-09-07 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 14:19:00 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Sunday, September 07, 2003 20:22:30 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] /usr/local/bin/gmake -C libpq all gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/libpq' cc -O -Kinline

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
know if it happens again, that's all ... Will do. Thanks for the fix(es). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Warning for missing createlang

2003-09-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
seem to me to be a good thing(tm) to have it in. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
in repository `/projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server' cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up $ On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
`/projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server' cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up $ On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set to run hourly

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
if that helps ... ? The src/tools/test_thread stuff, Added files: src/tools : test_thread_funcs.c I'll try a full checkout. LER On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: I still did NOT pick up any changes :-( Would you like an account on my box or do I need to do a full checkout? LER

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 13:39:44 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 15:35:48 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: k, which file specifically are you expecting a change in? as I said, the changes to pltcl.c that tom did today

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
this program and report back the results. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 17:09:49 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: From UnixWare: $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: From UnixWare: $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl UX:acomp: WARNING: test_thread.c, line 60: argument #3 incompatible with prototype: pthread_create

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
Can you pass me what's in CVS (anon hasn't updated afaict). And, what didn't you like about my version? LER --On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 18:35:44 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: What does your OS want for the 3rd argument of pthread_create()? I

[HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
Today's commits from Bruce don't seem to be there. I'm doing: cvs update -d -P (I sent another note to Marc as a safety). LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
that help? Nope. I'm still not seeing Bruce's changes for the threads stuff nor the added tools files. :-( LER On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: Today's commits from Bruce don't seem to be there. I'm doing: cvs update -d -P (I sent another note to Marc as a safety). LER -- Larry

Re: [HACKERS] ANONCVS? Is it being updated correctly?

2003-09-03 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 23:34:09 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set to run hourly, and there aren't any log files

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 00:04:35 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Oh, interesting. So you are saying that if the OS supports threads, then we use the *_r if they have them, and assume the non *_r functions are already thread-safe if they don't

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
can't assume because a *_r function is missing that the normal function is thread-safe. So, given that UnixWare doesn't have gethostbyname_r and strerror_r, but does have getpwuid_r, will y'all declare that UnixWare has thread-safety? My vote is YES. LER -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:32:08 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Where does it say that you have to use getpwuid_r() to be thread safe? I don't see any mention in the docs. It does say about getpwuid: For getpwent, getpwuid, getpwnam

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:35:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:20:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Lee Kindness writes: You don't... and you simply shouldn't care

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
the getpwuid_r() function? LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 18:12:48 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 19:53:38 +0200 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lee Kindness writes: Bruce Momjian writes: Right. We can't assume because a *_r

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 18:32:03 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Right. We can't assume because a *_r function is missing that the normal function is thread-safe. That's not our concern - if the OS isn't thread

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
like to see a thread-safe libpq. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 13:11:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Monday, September 01, 2003 12:35:43 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Um. I don't think that's true. I mean, in theory it's true, but in practice why would an OS

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 14:24:14 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Monday, September 01, 2003 12:35:43 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Um. I don't think that's true. I mean

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
lane -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9

Re: [HACKERS] Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-09-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 22:02:00 +0100 Lee Kindness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: then how do we *PROVE* thread-safety on a particular platform? You're not going to be able to prove it anyway! which is my point. L. -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] dns prob

2003-08-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
postgresql.org. $ --On Sunday, August 31, 2003 22:18:40 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a problem with DNS? a few hours ago, www.fr.postgresql.org was not defined, now that it works again, ftp.fr.postgresql.org dosn't exist -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler

Re: [HACKERS] dns prob

2003-08-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
A 194.250.190.252 www2 --On Sunday, August 31, 2003 15:27:19 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like Marc's script removed it $ cd /var/adm/named/cache $ grep ftp.fr postgresql.org $ ls -l postgresql.org -rw-r--r--1 root sys8517 Aug

[HACKERS] UnixWare patches placed on my www site

2003-08-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
. this will allow us to NOT have to muck with LD_LIBRARY_PATH nor symlinks out of /usr/lib/ These are against today's CVS. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, August 29, 2003 22:58:50 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Thursday, August 28, 2003 19:31:17 +0200 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Lane writes: Beta2 is a done deal. When Bruce gets back from the seashore I expect he'll

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, August 29, 2003 23:00:46 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Thursday, August 28, 2003 01:06:46 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My UnixWare Thread.c patch/fix has been IGNORED. I'd like

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
for complaining about these facts. I want to see PostgreSQL succeed and take over the Open Source DataBase world, and want to help, but y'all are making it HARD. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, August 29, 2003 23:17:50 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Don't start on the SCO issue. I submitted patches last weekend to fix the UnixWare (and possibly other) issues. You said you were working on them, then I see the note that BETA2 was tagged

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
still can't --enable-thread-safety due to the code in thread.c. I'll shut up now. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
break more platforms. Actually, we **ONLY** have getpwuid_r, not gethostbyname_r nor strerror_r LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
are making it HARD. Because one patch wasn't committed before we tar'd up a new beta? no, because the SCO/IBM/RED HAT lawsuits keep getting thrown in my face everytime I ask for UnixWare specific changes. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:35:10 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:19:49 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So be it, but I was under the impression that the fix would

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:57:45 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: Index: src/port/thread.c === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/port/thread.c,v

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
, so we will use getpwuid_r in the ENABLE_THREADS case. UnixWare does NOT have strerror_r nor does it have gethostbyname_r, and the libc versions are reentrant in libc, for those 2. We need to use getpwuid_r for threaded apps. Does this clarify things? LER -- Larry Rosenman

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:17:41 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Saturday, August 30, 2003 01:09:54 -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 'K, but why the change to NEEDS_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES in the first place? The thing that has

Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

2003-08-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:51:01 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other such platforms before I figure out how

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
IGNORED. I'd like to see a fix before we declare Beta2. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match -- Larry Rosenman http

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, August 28, 2003 01:06:46 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My UnixWare Thread.c patch/fix has been IGNORED. I'd like to see a fix before we declare Beta2. Beta2 is a done deal. When Bruce gets back from the seashore I expect he'll

Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...

2003-08-28 Thread Larry Rosenman
someone tell the rest of the world ahead of time when release steps are going to happen? AND make sure key people are *NOT UNAVAILABLE* for issues? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare on Current CVS: Success!

2003-08-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
a HAVE_GETPWUID_R flag, and arrange for configure to set that flag. Thanks, LER - -- Larry Rosenman wrote: Didn't seem to. Did you see my posts from fri/sat on -hackers? I included what DID work for me. LER --On Sunday

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare on Current CVS: Success!

2003-08-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
stuff on Friday/Saturday with no comment, as soon as I returned from Las Vegas. So, I'm a little cranky. Sorry. LER - -- Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Sunday, August 24, 2003 22:49:00 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare on Current CVS: Success!

2003-08-25 Thread Larry Rosenman
Didn't seem to. Did you see my posts from fri/sat on -hackers? I included what DID work for me. LER --On Sunday, August 24, 2003 19:21:57 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: On Aug 17 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did something changed on today's cvs. src

Re: [HACKERS] strerror_r and gethostbyname_r?

2003-08-23 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, August 22, 2003 21:23:57 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I --enable-thread-safety and JUST need the getpwuid_r function and not the strerror_r and gethostbyname_r function? UnixWare doesn't have strerror_r and gethostbyname_r, and we DONT NEED THEM! Please

[HACKERS] strerror_r and gethostbyname_r?

2003-08-22 Thread Larry Rosenman
unixware --- src/template/unixware 16 Aug 2003 15:35:51 - 1.15 +++ src/template/unixware 23 Aug 2003 02:22:11 - @@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ SUPPORTS_THREADS=yes NEED_REENTRANT_FUNC_NAMES=yes -THREAD_CFLAGS += -D_REENTRANT +THREAD_CFLAGS=$THREAD_CFLAGS -D_REENTRANT -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare on Current CVS: Success!

2003-08-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
from Forum. Then, configure can't find strerror_r ... That worked like a charm 2 days ago... On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:36:22 +0200 (MET DST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: UnixWare

Re: [HACKERS] full path infrastructure for DT_SONAME?

2003-08-18 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Aug 16 2003, Tom Lane wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Has the idea of putting the infrastructure in place to allow a full pathname to be fed to DT_SONAME been totally killed? What makes you think you need new infrastructure? The HPUX port has used a full-path rpath

Re: [HACKERS] Can't load a 7.3.4 dump into 7.4CVS

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, August 09, 2003 12:31:06 -0500 Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another issue: plpgsql.so needs the elog() function, but it's not exported... actually, this is because of a hardcoded path in my old db, it was picking up the 7.3.4 plpgsql.so. LER -- Larry Rosenman

Re: [HACKERS] Another day, another SCO Compiler Error...

2003-08-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
changed (I regularly blew up the compiler back then). hehe. andrew Larry Rosenman wrote: I managed to blow the SCO compiler up again with /contrib/cube. the only workaround (from SCO already) is to disable -O on that module. Fair warning. LER

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >