There was a bug introduce by my last commit.
All should be Ok now.
Best,
Yannick
2010/4/23 pedram salehpoor
> Yeah something is wrong. the pages can't be opened.
>
> Best,
> Pedram
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Jesús Cova
> wrote:
> > Good morning, i'm triying to edit a document by php
Yeah something is wrong. the pages can't be opened.
Best,
Pedram
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Jesús Cova
wrote:
> Good morning, i'm triying to edit a document by php edit online and i can
> not open the document i push twice click and it does not open.. what could
> be happenig?
>
> --
> Reg
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 23:26, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
> Hi Philip:
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:05:03PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
>>
>> Typically people use a symlink, see:
>> http://wiki.php.net/doc/phd/view
>
> Oy. Yet another documentation how to page. :) I was looking at similar,
I he
Hi Philip:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:05:03PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> Typically people use a symlink, see:
> http://wiki.php.net/doc/phd/view
Oy. Yet another documentation how to page. :) I was looking at similar,
but slightly different instructions on
http://doc.php.net/php/dochowt
On Apr 21, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> Hi Folks:
>
> I just set up a mirror of the PHP website on my Linux box for
> documentation testing purposes. The website has the manual output in
> "/manual/en". But PhD puts the output in
> "/php-web".
>
> This happens because Packa
On 12 Oct 2009, at 13:00, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:57, Anthony Bedford > wrote:
Hi,
In my DocBook source I have something like:
These do not mean percentages. "meaning this column should be number
times wider than a column with the mea
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:57, Anthony Bedford wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my DocBook source I have something like:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
These do not mean percentages. "meaning this column should be number
times wider than a column with the measure “1*” (or just “*”)"[1]
My Engles
2009/1/21 Nick Shaforostoff :
> Kalle Sommer Nielsen писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 21 Jan
> 2009 09:20:09 +0200:
>>
>> The "real" documentation on the www.php.net server / mirrors is
>> updated once a week (Friday or Sunday I think it is), however the
>> special docs mirror: http://docs.php.net/ is
Kalle Sommer Nielsen писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 21 Jan
2009 09:20:09 +0200:
The "real" documentation on the www.php.net server / mirrors is
updated once a week (Friday or Sunday I think it is), however the
special docs mirror: http://docs.php.net/ is updated several times a
day (if the transl
2009/1/21 Rafael Jaques :
> Well... It's a problem then..
>
> Because I'm acessing from docs.php.net
> :(
>
You can generate a copy in around 2 minutes to check for yourself with PhD ;)
--
Kalle Sommer Nielsen
Well... It's a problem then..
Because I'm acessing from docs.php.net
:(
2009/1/21 Hannes Magnusson
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:20, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> > Hi Rafael
> >
> > 2009/1/21 Rafael Jaques :
> >> Hello there!
> >>
> >> I made some changes on parts of the manual in pt-BR yester
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:20, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Hi Rafael
>
> 2009/1/21 Rafael Jaques :
>> Hello there!
>>
>> I made some changes on parts of the manual in pt-BR yesterday.. Then I
>> commited..
>> But the change don't took place!
>>
>> Is there anything else that I have to do or just
Hi Rafael
2009/1/21 Rafael Jaques :
> Hello there!
>
> I made some changes on parts of the manual in pt-BR yesterday.. Then I
> commited..
> But the change don't took place!
>
> Is there anything else that I have to do or just wait?
The "real" documentation on the www.php.net server / mirrors is
2008/6/22 Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 19:02, Richard Quadling
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ah. You need to upgrade your phd. See changes 1.50 to 1.53
> > (http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/phpdoc/configure.php?r1=1.50&r2=1.53)
>
> Just to be clear: phpdoc/ i
> Ah. You need to upgrade your phd. See changes 1.50 to 1.53
> > (http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/phpdoc/configure.php?r1=1.50&r2=1.53)
>
> Just to be clear: phpdoc/ is _not_ PhD. configure.php is not part of PhD.
> The only PhD related stuff is under the phd/ CVS module.
>
> To be more precise my pr
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 19:02, Richard Quadling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ah. You need to upgrade your phd. See changes 1.50 to 1.53
> (http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/phpdoc/configure.php?r1=1.50&r2=1.53)
Just to be clear: phpdoc/ is _not_ PhD. configure.php is not part of PhD.
The only PhD re
>
> Ah. You need to upgrade your phd. See changes 1.50 to 1.53 (
> http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/phpdoc/configure.php?r1=1.50&r2=1.53)
>
OH! I upgraded it. Thank you very much.
Regards.
Pedram
2008/6/22 pedram salehpoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Hannes Magnusson <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 19:51, pedram salehpoor
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > hello everyone
>> > I tried to build phpdoc with my php 2-7-dev 2 june 2008.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Hannes Magnusson <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 19:51, pedram salehpoor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hello everyone
> > I tried to build phpdoc with my php 2-7-dev 2 june 2008. But it failed.
> The
> > other time when it failed I got late
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 19:51, pedram salehpoor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello everyone
> I tried to build phpdoc with my php 2-7-dev 2 june 2008. But it failed. The
> other time when it failed I got latest version (2 june 2008) and it solved
> my problem but this time latest version did not so
2008/6/2 Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But requires newer cvs/snapshot of PHP _IF_ you are a -dev release.
If using 5.2.6 or earlier, then all should be ok.
>>>
>
> And fwiw I believe this change to 5_2 php-src will be reverted but remain in
> 5_3/6_0.
>
> Regards,
But requires newer cvs/snapshot of PHP _IF_ you are a -dev release.
If using 5.2.6 or earlier, then all should be ok.
And fwiw I believe this change to 5_2 php-src will be reverted but
remain in 5_3/6_0.
Regards,
Philip
Hello Richard
Thank that solved my problem!
2008/6/2 pedram salehpoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> What version of PHP are you using? From the command line can you type
>> php -v and cut and paste the entire output?
>>
>> I can only guess you are on a 5.3.0-dev which was built before 2008-05-29.
>>
>> The issue is with windows cmd.exe not liking
>
> What version of PHP are you using? From the command line can you type
> php -v and cut and paste the entire output?
>
> I can only guess you are on a 5.3.0-dev which was built before 2008-05-29.
>
> The issue is with windows cmd.exe not liking running programs with
> spaces in program name and
2008/6/2 Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:42 AM, pedram salehpoor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello Hannes
>>
>> I found the source of problem. I'm building phpdoc and phpdoc-fa using
>> Windows XP.
>>
>> When I omit "&& phpversion() < '5.2.7'" from line 121 in
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:42 AM, pedram salehpoor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Hannes
>
> I found the source of problem. I'm building phpdoc and phpdoc-fa using
> Windows XP.
>
> When I omit "&& phpversion() < '5.2.7'" from line 121 in configure.php, it
> builds without problem and it has no
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:34 AM, pedram salehpoor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone
> I tried to build my latest phpdoc I got through CVS but it gave me problem
> in "version.ent" with "Startingtag: invalid element name". What's causing
> it?
>
> It stopped me checking translation files to
On 23.05.2008 15:17, pedram salehpoor wrote:
hi everybody
I tried to use configure.php on my latest phpdoc version I got through
anonymous cvs account but it returned with error "element variable is not
declared in entry list of possible children" and in details the problem is
in en/reference/pha
Please ask support questions at php-general@lists.php.net
Regards,
Gabor Hojtsy
rahot man wrote:
I have windows server 2003, PHPv5.0.3, Mysql v4.1 and IIS 6 and i am
working in Macromedia Dreamweaver MX2004
i am unable to connect to the mysql server. but my php files running
fine and my mysql serve
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> I have modified the docs to show optional parameters, like this:
>
> stringpg_parameter_status
> choice="opt">resourceconnection
>
> stringparam_name
>
> string pg_parameter_status ( [resource connection, string param_name] )
This is expecte
Because it shouldn't have been allowed in PHP in the first place.
But it IS in PHP, and there are hundreds of functions that use it...
Chris
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > This is expected, optional parameters are allowed only at the end of
> > parameters list. If the parameter in the beginning is optional provide
> > two block as in e.g. ibase_blob_echo.
>
> Gah I hate that style, and wanted to get rid of it.
This is expected, optional parameters are allowed only at the end of
parameters list. If the parameter in the beginning is optional provide
two block as in e.g. ibase_blob_echo.
Gah I hate that style, and wanted to get rid of it.
If PHP allows you to have leading optional parameters like in
ibase
I've not been following this nor do I know this topic
very well but iirc as of 4.3.0 the default for CLI
is to not do relative includes. In otherwords, the .
is not in include_path anymore for it by default. I
think that began in 4.3.0...? Maybe that is related.
And regarding track_vars, that's
I cannot check it on *nix, I would probably commit and wait to see
if it works or not, unless noone replys with some negative comments ;)
Goba
Done.
I just have to correct myself: the cli-story is different due to the
working-dirs, but I tried it just with my batchfiles, which always step
dir
> I can't see any differences in the behavior of "../" between cgi- and
> cli-version (at least on my win-box, and I would wonder if it is on
> Linux, and if, somebody should report it to qa), but it seems to be the
> old story of currentdir, workdir, etc. on the different machines.
>
> If I'm
Hi all,
I can't see any differences in the behavior of "../" between cgi- and
cli-version (at least on my win-box, and I would wonder if it is on
Linux, and if, somebody should report it to qa), but it seems to be the
old story of currentdir, workdir, etc. on the different machines.
If I'm rig
As far as I have seen Friedhelm committed a fix to solve
this problem [it is because of the CGI/CLI differences]...
Goba
> The same to pt_BR
>
> Fernando
>
> Martin Samesch escreveu:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >http://www.php.net/manual/de/revcheck.html.gz tells me that "The de
> >language code is not va
The same to pt_BR
Fernando
Martin Samesch escreveu:
Hi,
http://www.php.net/manual/de/revcheck.html.gz tells me that "The de
language code is not valid".
Is it broken?
Martin
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I'm not sure what to say except that I see no build.log
as the following doesn't exist either:
http://www.php.net/zh/blog
But this does:
http://www.php.net/en/blog
It exists for most languages. One day here all these
build issues will be solved. For example /en/ was
last built on Nov 20
ED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] Problem with php.net editing manual notes
>
> I have enabled the scrollbar on the edit
> window, hope that helps.
>
> Goba
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Erica Douglass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTEC
Sorry, but this email address is not the
appropriate forum for askingsupport questions. For a list of more
appropriate places toask for help using PHP, please visit http://php.net/support Thank you
for your interest in PHP. Goba
- Original Message -
From:
Azizul Bin
Ahmad
Those missing ids seemed was not put into missing-ids.xml, this file has
only one line:
Anyhow, since it's not critical, I would rather ignore it. Thank you for
telling me that, I haven't generate html files for long 'cuz this error...
Greg
"Gabor Hojtsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> Just now, I deleted my all repository files and re-checkout the phpdoc
> and phpdoc-zh molude to their right directory, but after I made a
configure
> and ran 'make test', I still get following error report:
> [...]
Configure should put the missing ids into missing-ids.xml
(through missing-
> > ./en/faq/obtaining.xml:211:21:X reference to non-existent ID
> > "install.windows.build"
>
> this is defined in en/chapters/install.xml
> looks like hu/chapters/install.xml is outdated
It is. I'll try to correct this on the weekend.
It is quite huge, and really hard to maintain.
We should e
Luca Perugini wrote:
> ./en/faq/obtaining.xml:211:21:X reference to non-existent ID
> "install.windows.build"
this is defined in en/chapters/install.xml
looks like hu/chapters/install.xml is outdated
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.six.de +49-711-99091-77
Cynic wrote:
> Emacs? NT (No Thanks) - last time I tried win32 Emacs I felt
> like a victim of a particularly bad joke.
Emaca on NT (and also on Unix) combined with PSGML package is most
productive XML/SGML editor for me. And Emacs have built in capability to
save and open files in different enc
Yes, just make sure that you're not outputting *anything* (even blank
lines like at the end of an included file or something,
lines, or such) before the start of the session or whereever you
send the first cookie (i.e. session_start(), session_register()). Or
turn cookies off and use the transpa
Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
>
> > I looked briefly at files with Czech translations. They are not in fact
> > correct XML files. They should start with correct encoding declaration
> > on the first line of each file:
> >
> >
> >
> > Jade silently ignores this error, but other XML based tools may have bi
At 07:34 26.1. 2001, Jouni Ahto wrote the following:
--
>On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Cynic wrote:
>
>> I've already found a commandline tool that seems to be perfect.
>> Right now I'm configuring it, will try.
>> Could you please try and build
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Cynic wrote:
> I've already found a commandline tool that seems to be perfect.
> Right now I'm configuring it, will try.
> Could you please try and build the cs docs when I convert them?
Ok. I'll try to check the traffic on this list a few times during the
workday, but do
I've already found a commandline tool that seems to be perfect.
Right now I'm configuring it, will try.
Could you please try and build the cs docs when I convert them?
Emacs? NT (No Thanks) - last time I tried win32 Emacs I felt
like a victim of a particularly bad joke.
At 07:21 26.1. 2001, Jo
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Cynic wrote:
> But I didn't--and still don't--know of a tool for win1250 <-> iso8859-2
> conversion. I just wanted to start committing to see some progress, and
> convert it later, ASA I find something.
On the Windows side, I don't know of anything. But you could install
> I looked briefly at files with Czech translations. They are not in fact
> correct XML files. They should start with correct encoding declaration
> on the first line of each file:
>
>
>
> Jade silently ignores this error, but other XML based tools may have big
> problems with it.
There is no
Below are a few responses to the mails my start of the translation
to Czech provoked, and sorry for the trouble.
At 01:28 25.1. 2001, Jouni Ahto wrote the following:
--
>Cynic/Roman (don't know which one is appropriate), please fix al
"Egon Schmid (@work)" wrote:
>
> Jim Winstead wrote:
>
> > it is in some character set other than utf-8. it needs to be in utf-8.
> > (the html output will be whatever is appropriate for the language, but
> > the xml needs to be in utf-8.)
>
> There is no need for utf-8. It's a European languag
Hi!
The to: and cc: lists of this mail are growing :)
> Oh, I think I guess what the problem is, it's called 'Microsoft'. They
> seem to have placed some characters used in the Czech language in the
> range 0x80-0x9f, not in in the official ISO-8859-2. Although, Hungarian
> uses the same ISO cha
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Egon Schmid (@work) wrote:
> Jim Winstead wrote:
>
> > it is in some character set other than utf-8. it needs to be in utf-8.
> > (the html output will be whatever is appropriate for the language, but
> > the xml needs to be in utf-8.)
>
> There is no need for utf-8. It's
Anderson Fortaleza wrote:
>
> you guys mean that i cannot use things like:
>
> á, ã, õ, ã, í, etc. directly in the XML code ?
>
> I was looking at the Spanish translation and they
> don´t use it directly. Can I ?
I don't know. Try it out. Spanish is in ISO 8859-1 (latin1) and should
IMHO work.
you guys mean that i cannot use things like:
á, ã, õ, ã, í, etc. directly in the XML code ?
I was looking at the Spanish translation and they
don´t use it directly. Can I ?
thx
=
Anderson Fortaleza
UIN - 1303682
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auct
Jim Winstead wrote:
> it is in some character set other than utf-8. it needs to be in utf-8.
> (the html output will be whatever is appropriate for the language, but
> the xml needs to be in utf-8.)
There is no need for utf-8. It's a European language and could be
handled just like the French or
62 matches
Mail list logo
