hello,
I checked the doc about the mail relay in postfix and still not
clear about two issues.
I have mail sending from machine A to machine B, machine B is a relay
server forwarding the email to machine C (target machine).
I want to make sure there is no emails bouncing back from either
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 23:40 -0700, tom lee wrote:
hello,
I checked the doc about the mail relay in postfix and still not
clear about two issues.
I have mail sending from machine A to machine B, machine B is a relay
server forwarding the email to machine C (target machine).
I want to
On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
you must understand the difference between
virtual_mailbox_domains
and
virtual_alias_domains
I understand the difference, I have virtual_mailbox_domains assigned
and I don't have virtual_alias_domains :)
Actually, isn't
Hi ,
I've controlled the mails delivery rate( F.E hotmail ,1mail /10s) in
postfix, when this mail is delivered the first time, this rate is okay, but
there is another problem shows, if some mails are back into queue for
reject reason from one ISP(hotmail), it looks like the re-sending rate is
LuKreme:
On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
you must understand the difference between
virtual_mailbox_domains
and
virtual_alias_domains
I understand the difference, I have virtual_mailbox_domains assigned
and I don't have virtual_alias_domains :)
By default,
On Mar 10, 2009, at 4:29 AM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
you must understand the difference between
virtual_mailbox_domains
and
virtual_alias_domains
I understand the difference, I have virtual_mailbox_domains assigned
and I don't have
Is it possible to do this on the domain level as opposed to the user level?
That way everything from example.com goes to gateway 1 and everything from
example.net goes to gateway 2?
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On
On 3/9/2009 6:12 PM, mouss wrote:
It will never fail that the user will decide right after clicking the
send button that they want to recall it, no matter how long they wait
prior to sending...
and they will also decide to recall it after it was released ;-p
Of course... but all joking
On 10 Mar 2009, at 13:24, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Do not include virtual_alias_maps in local_recipient_maps.
virtual_alias_maps are checked globally for all Address Classes.
For more on Address Classes, see
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html
That makes sense. I'm
Glen B:
?
? I'm running the commands from a SSH shell logged in as root. What do you
mean by setuid wrapper?
?
Type the following commands, and report the output:
$ date
$ mailq | grep DBBAD4A340AD
$ date
This may very well be a Debian bug where they run daemons chrooted
but don't provide
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:43 -0400, Zachary Fortna zfor...@cxtec.com
wrote:
Is it possible to do this on the domain level as opposed to the user
level?
That way everything from example.com goes to gateway 1 and everything
from
example.net goes to gateway 2?
Have a look at:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:43 -0400, Zachary Fortna zfor...@cxtec.com
wrote:
Is it possible to do this on the domain level as opposed to the user
level?
That way everything from example.com goes to gateway 1 and everything
from
example.net goes to gateway 2?
I may have goofed, I'm not sure
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:01 AM, ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 23:40 -0700, tom lee wrote:
hello,
I checked the doc about the mail relay in postfix and still not
clear about two issues.
I have mail sending from machine A to machine B, machine B is a relay
server
Roderick A. Anderson:
I keep seeing and having questions on valid parameters and valid values
for them. The Postfix.org site and manual have great listings and this
list has provided excellent info on them.
Still I stay a bit confused as I started with an older version (could
have been
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:27:21PM +0800, Tony Liu wrote:
I've controlled the mails delivery rate( F.E hotmail ,1mail /10s) in
postfix, when this mail is delivered the first time, this rate is okay, but
there is another problem shows, if some mails are back into queue for
reject reason from
Is it possible to implement multiple HOLD queues for different types of
content that requires inspection (spam, file attachments, etc?)
Thanks!
Terry
Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below. I
referred many documents to compile the options. I want you experts to once
verify it for me.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:52:07AM -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
Is it possible to implement multiple HOLD queues for different types of
content that requires inspection (spam, file attachments, etc?)
Yes, use FILTER rather than HOLD, and deliver the mail to separate
Postfix quarantine instances
Wietse Venema wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson:
I keep seeing and having questions on valid parameters and valid values
for them. The Postfix.org site and manual have great listings and this
list has provided excellent info on them.
Still I stay a bit confused as I started with an older version
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
smtpd_helo_restrictions = ...
smtpd_data_restrictions = ...
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ...
header_checks = ...
I'm assuming smtpd_* means the the first three are handled by smtpd but in
what order?
Well, the only
Linux Addict wrote:
Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below.
I referred many documents to compile the options. I want you experts to
once verify it for me.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:59:22AM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below. I
referred many documents to compile the options. I want you experts to once
verify it for me.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:17:29PM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below.
I referred many documents to compile the options. I want you experts to
once verify it for me.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
Roderick A. Anderson:
In a main.cf I have:
smtpd_helo_restrictions = ...
smtpd_data_restrictions = ...
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ...
header_checks = ...
I'm assuming smtpd_* means the the first three are handled by smtpd but
in what order? I'm leaning towards helo, recipient,
Terry Carmen:
Is it possible to implement multiple HOLD queues for different types of
content that requires inspection (spam, file attachments, etc?)
Yes. This functionality can be added to Postfix, by plugging an
external information management system into the many standard
message interfaces
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:17:29PM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed
below.
I referred many documents to compile the
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:05:28AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
snip /
Well, the only opportunity to respond an SMTP command is in respnse to
*that* command, so originally these took place at the time of the
correspoding SMTP command.
connect:
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Glen B batch...@bellsouth.net wrote:
From: Glen B batch...@bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: v2.5.5 showq and postcat date/time stamp discrepancy
To: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 1:16 PM
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Wietse Venema
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:20:15AM -0700, Glen B wrote:
box:/# mailq | grep DBBAD4A340AD
postqueue: warning: Mail system is down -- accessing queue
directly
DBBAD4A340AD? 827 Mon Mar? 9 10:29:27? root
box:/# date
Tue Mar 10 12:39:03 EDT 2009
box:/#
Perhaps the postfix user is
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:59:22AM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below.
I
referred many documents to compile the options. I want you
Wietse:
Type the following commands, and report the output:
$ date
$ mailq | grep DBBAD4A340AD
$ date
This may very well be a Debian bug where they run daemons chrooted
but don't provide the correct timezone file inside the jail.
Glen B:
box:/# date
Tue Mar 10 12:38:51 EDT 2009
box:/# mailq
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:37:07PM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
permit
Fairly sensible overall.
Is it better to place rbl rejections under smtpd_client_restrictions?
No,
On 10-Mar-2009, at 06:44, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mar 10, 2009, at 4:29 AM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
you must understand the difference between
virtual_mailbox_domains
and
virtual_alias_domains
I understand the difference, I have
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:33:52PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
Could I simply change my virtual_alias_maps definition above to
virtual_alias_domains? I don't think so. At least how this is setup, the
mysql_virtual_alias.maps.cf returns the alias (forwarding alias) of
accounts that have an alias
On 3/10/2009, Victor Duchovni (victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com) wrote:
There are two decent books and I find that tabbed browsing makes it easy to
not lose context. Certainly the links to postconf.5.html don't usually
require too many levels of nesting, so first read the tutorial, open
Hello All,
I am running postfix (apple version) with MAC OSX10.4.11 client. I
found the following entries in the Console/501/console.log. I am
concerned but do not know what it means. The var/log/mail.log does
not show any errors and seem to be sending/receiving mail without
problem.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:37:27PM +, Rupert Reid wrote:
I am running postfix (apple version) with MAC OSX10.4.11 client. I found
the following entries in the Console/501/console.log. I am concerned but
do not know what it means. The var/log/mail.log does not show any errors
and
On 10-Mar-2009, at 09:59, Linux Addict wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
I have reject_invalid_hostname here as well (before permit_mynetworks)
permit_mynetworks,
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:36:25 -0400 (EDT)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
This may very well be a Debian bug where they run daemons chrooted
but don't provide the correct timezone file inside the jail.
Just for reference, the postfix 2.5.5-1.1 package in Debian -- if any
services in
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:28:00PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Mar-2009, at 09:59, Linux Addict wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
I have reject_invalid_hostname here as
On 10-Mar-2009, at 12:41, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:33:52PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
Could I simply change my virtual_alias_maps definition above to
virtual_alias_domains? I don't think so. At least how this is
setup, the
mysql_virtual_alias.maps.cf returns the alias
On 10-Mar-2009, at 13:37, Rupert Reid wrote:
Hello All,
I am running postfix (apple version) with MAC OSX10.4.11 client. I
found the following entries in the Console/501/console.log. I am
concerned but do not know what it means. The var/log/mail.log does
not show any errors and seem
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:46:29PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
The recommended approach for those ready to move beyond 1.1 compatible
settings is:
virtual_alias_domains = ... explicit list of domains or tables ...
virtual_alias_maps = ... tables ...
if the number of virtual alias domains
Ben Winslow:
FWIW, my test system uses the system-wide timezone (US/Central)
in the output from mailq and the timezone from $TZ (US/Eastern)
for the output from postcat. This is, IMO, the correct behavior.
I hadn't thought of that (system versus user time zone). It could
explain the original
On 10-Mar-2009, at 15:22, Victor Duchovni wrote:
None, but the trivial-rewrite service will be saddled with one less
MySQL lookup to determine the address class of a domain. Ideally you
also move virtual_mailbox_domains to its own parameter also, and
don't rely on implicit lookups of that in
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:57:04PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
OK OK, so I go from this:
virtual_alias_maps =
hash:$config_directory/virtual,
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
to this:
virtual_alias_maps =
On 10-Mar-2009, at 16:06, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:57:04PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
virtual_alias_domains=[list of domains extracted from virtual]
Yes, provided the latter contains only domain anything entries and
no
address rewrite-address entries.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:22:00PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
Yes, provided of course the hash table only contained domains. Or could
just set:
virtual_alias_domains = hash:$config_directory/virtual
Ah... er... OK, now you lost me again. What in $DEITY's name would be the
point of that?
LuKreme a écrit :
On 9-Mar-2009, at 15:58, mouss wrote:
you must understand the difference between
virtual_mailbox_domains
and
virtual_alias_domains
I understand the difference, I have virtual_mailbox_domains assigned and
I don't have virtual_alias_domains :)
then set
Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 3/9/2009 6:12 PM, mouss wrote:
I only said it was an interesting idea, and wondered if it could be
automated... I'm still not sure it *should* be done... :)
it can be automated. the hard part is to define the criteria (when to
keep, when to release) and how to
tom lee a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:01 AM, ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 23:40 -0700, tom lee wrote:
hello,
I checked the doc about the mail relay in postfix and still not
clear about two issues.
I have mail sending from machine A to machine B, machine B is
Brian Evans - Postfix List a écrit :
Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
Is this sane or is it going to cause problems?
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
...
# Valid local users only exist in these locations
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
$virtual_alias_maps
...
# What are the domains
On 10-Mar-2009, at 15:57, LuKreme wrote:
virtual_alias_maps =
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
virtual_alias_domains=[list of domains extracted from virtual]
Ugh!
Seems $config_directory/ is not liked by mysql:
whew, it's always
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:47:22PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 10-Mar-2009, at 15:57, LuKreme wrote:
virtual_alias_maps =
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
virtual_alias_domains=[list of domains extracted from virtual]
Ugh!
Seems
Hi,
Let see how to explain this...
The issue is that I'm using sieve for my filtering rules, one of my
rules is to reject a message and notify sender, in this step, postfix
uses as mail from, this is a normal behavior i think; but in my
scenario where i have one fake domain and using
mme...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Let see how to explain this...
The issue is that I'm using sieve for my filtering rules, one of my
rules is to reject a message and notify sender.
Don't do that. By bouncing crap to the sender you are harassing
innocent people about mail that they did not send. If
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
All mails sending from machine A via relaying machine B will arrive in
machine C.
I think I need to set up something in machine B so that there will be no
mails
bounce back to machine A.
if you want machine B to send no
I've got the catch-all feature explained here working just fine...
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html
Is there an easy way to designate an explicit *invalid* email address so
that even though the catch-all is enabled for a domain, a specific email
address is considered invalid and is
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ben Winslow:
FWIW, my test system uses the system-wide timezone (US/Central)
in the output from mailq and the timezone from $TZ (US/Eastern)
for the output from postcat. This is, IMO, the correct behavior.
I hadn't thought of that (system versus user time zone).
On Mar 10, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Curtis wrote:
I've got the catch-all feature explained here working just fine...
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html
Is there an easy way to designate an explicit *invalid* email
address so that even though the catch-all is enabled for a domain, a
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:23:30PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mar 10, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Curtis wrote:
I've got the catch-all feature explained here working just fine...
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html
Is there an easy way to designate an explicit *invalid* email address so
Glen B wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Ben Winslow:
FWIW, my test system uses the system-wide timezone (US/Central)
in the output from mailq and the timezone from $TZ (US/Eastern)
for the output from postcat. This is, IMO, the correct behavior.
I hadn't thought of that (system versus
With these settings
virtual_alias_maps =
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
I get
mail postfix/smtpd[36156]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
lists.php.net[216.92.131.4]: 450
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:30:01PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
With these settings
virtual_alias_maps =
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
I get
mail postfix/smtpd[36156]:
On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:48 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
[...]
so with the above change to your main.cf, Postfix no longer accepts
mail from krem...@kreme.com.
s/from/for/
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@tandon.net
65 matches
Mail list logo
