Hello everyone,
When a client connects to qmail to send a mail, a DNS lookup is
performed by qmail to get the logical name of the client.
My question is : how to disable this lookup ?
Thks in advance
Philippe Lagente
AVS
begin:vcard
n:Lagente;Philippe
tel;cell:33 (0)6 80 45 27 32
tel;fax:33
Not that this is really an answer but just some terminology so others might
understand better...this is called a reverse DNS lookup and is referred to
in DNS language as ARPA (Address Resolution Protocol Architecture I
believe...). Might help you in your quest.
Brett
Manager
InterPlanetary Solut
Hi All,
Just to say thank you to everyone who replied to this: The replies
have been very helpful and I feel have clarified the issues -
it seems that 'Fixing' bare LF issues is likely to be more productive
(i.e. use fixcr or fixcrio) than messing around with Solaris patches.
And that's the solu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Jul 00, at 9:49, Andrew Richards wrote:
> For what it's worth, a reminder of using fixcr - aimed primarily at
> archive users who come across this message a month/year etc. ahead and
> want to see if this might fix similar issues for them...
>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 10:12:51AM +0200, Philippe Lagente wrote:
! When a client connects to qmail to send a mail, a DNS lookup is
! performed by qmail to get the logical name of the client.
! My question is : how to disable this lookup ?
1. Use tcpserver to serve your SMTP, instead of tcp-env,
Why DNS?
For two years, qmail works very well.
This problem appear when my back bone goes down and my router
doesn't have the international routes. It has the domestic routes, but
nothing out of Brazil.
-Original Message-
From: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry to contribute to the noise ratio on qmail-list ...
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Peter van Dijk wrote:
|> That's very nice, but what about the people blocking using
|> relays.orbs.org? Who told them that they would find DNS entries
|> belonging to hosts which had never spammed? This is other than
Philippe,
>When a client connects to qmail to send a mail, a DNS lookup is
>performed by qmail to get the logical name of the client.
>My question is : how to disable this lookup ?
Take a look at the -R and -H options to tcpserver. See
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html
for the 'ma
qmail Digest 25 Jul 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 1073
Topics (messages 45403 through 45519):
Re: MailDir
45403 by: Brett Randall
45405 by: Frank Tegtmeyer
45411 by: Philipp Steinkrüger
45450 by: Michael T. Babcock
Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying!
Hi all.
Im trying to get tcpserver configured to use the qmail-pop3d instead of
in.pop3d (rh 6.1).
What's the correct syntax for this?? Ive tried.
csh -cf '/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -c100 -u666 -g102 0 tcp-env qmail-popup
domain.net /usr/sbin/logpopauth-pre checkpassword /usr/bin/logpopauth-p
Hi List,
I have a little problem with creating a double alias. The situation is
the following: I have a mail server running qmail, which holds normal
mail boxes for POP3 clients, it also holds virtual domains which get
forwarded to local mail boxes for POP3 clients and it also has mail
queue´s fo
I BELIEVE this may be possible using the dot-forward package. Using a
.forward file, you should be able to forward to multiple addresses,
including the current one without creating a loop (I have done this before
in sendmail, and presume the same is true for the dot-forward package, but
it has bee
Hi,
I want to install qmail 1.03 on Red Hat Linux 6.0 with kernel version
2.2.10.
Can you tell me whether to to go for qmail-1.03.tar.gz or "memphis"
qmail
which is divided into two.
I heard that when using RH go for the rpms which come along with the
distribution,
so i am a bit confused.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 11:00:21AM +0100, Daniel Cave wrote:
! What's the correct syntax for this?? Ive tried.
!
! csh -cf '/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -c100 -u666 -g102 0 tcp-env qmail-popup
! domain.net /usr/sbin/logpopauth-pre checkpassword /usr/bin/logpopauth-post
! qmail-pop3d Maildir' &
!
Nithin
I would use the qmail-1.03 package as you can be assured that it will
contain stock qmail featured and not 'other' third party non djb appoved
programmes for qmail.
Good luck,
Dan Cave.
Hi,
I want to install qmail 1.03 on Red Hat Linux 6.0 with kernel version
2.2.10.
Can you tell me w
Hello!
How can I do forwarding to another host
?
I have setup several virtualdomains and
now
all the mail for the domain example.com should be
redirected to host.mydomain.com.
How can I do that?
Sincerly,
Nico Schottelius
Nico.
Install and read the fastforward package for qmail.
http://cr.yp.to/fastforward.html
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Jochen E. Führing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 July 2000 12:02
To: QMail Mailing List
Subject: forwarding to another host
Hello!
How can I do forwarding to an
Hi *,
after testing various configurations of qmail (different
conf-splits, with/without patches), I moved the queue-dir
to a partition, which resides on two disks - in fact RAID1+0 via
SDS.
And the errors went away. Furthermore, I learned, that
sending via qmail-inject doesn't have these proble
Jochen E. Führing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How can I do forwarding to another host ? I have setup several
>virtualdomains and now all the mail for the domain example.com should
>be redirected to host.mydomain.com.
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to do since you mention
virtual domain
[New user alert]
Running FreeBSD 4.0
Just installed qmail-1.03 from the FreeBSD ports collection.
My setup is a home user machine, laptop running FreeBSD that accesses
the internet by IP masquerade of desktop machine (also home user
machine) which is connected via DSL to local ISP. My main inte
I am moving big server from sendmail to qmail and I want to be sure
that I didn't forgot something I want all mail which could be delivered
to be stored in some account. Is making /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default
sufficient?
--
Ondřej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Globe Internet s.r.o.http://globe.c
Mike Flynn writes:
> I work for IBM and I want to install qmail
> on my server. IBM requires that I present
> our legal department with an actual license
> so that the Intellectual Property lawyers can
> review it and bless it or not. I will not
> be distributing qmail in any way, just usi
Hello everyone,
Onyone knows some relationship betwween root named servers(DNS) and
qmail.
Yesterday, when my international backbone goes down, my DNS goes down
too because the named root servers are located in USA. And I suspect
that exists one relationship between the problems.
anyone already
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:24:17AM -0400, Paul Jarc wrote:
> "Michael T. Babcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > VERP was proposed by DJB as a way to identify bounce recipients. VERP
> > requires that each recipient have their own From: as well as To:.
>
> Not quite: it's envelope senders and r
> What is the best way to set up qmail to handle mails from web
> forms and CGIs and send it to a mail hub for processing i.e a
> qmail install that does not do any mail processing even for
> locals but send all mail to another qmail server.
Put ":mailhub.domain.com" into /var/qmail/
Hi all.
I currently have qmail-smtpd running under tcpserver using the 'allow
authorised RELAY hosts /etc/tcp.smtp' mechanism. for dialup ISP email. Im
not sure of a few things.
1. If someone tries to relay an email from an IP address (ISP dialup) which
is not listed in /etc/tcp.smtp, and who's
Your arguments are interesting in so far as they pertain to the use of QMTP, but
my concern is more that at some point the Qmail community may want to have QMTP
as RFCxyz and used as a standard feature of mail exchange. With that goal (in my
mind, maybe not yours), my proposal seemed to have more
Are you sure you aren't a little confused? I meant the dot-forward add-on
package that uses a literal .forward file in the user's home.
If this package doesn't work, the only other idea I personally would have
would be to setup up the alias to forward to two different accounts: a
different mail s
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 05:10:13AM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> [New user alert]
> Running FreeBSD 4.0
> Just installed qmail-1.03 from the FreeBSD ports collection.
>
> My setup is a home user machine, laptop running FreeBSD that accesses
> the internet by IP masquerade of desktop machine (al
"David Dyer-Bennet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah! Okay, I see some objection there. I've had double-bounces turned
> off for a long, long time (and none of the causes were ORBS probes),
> but a more macho admin wouldn't want to do that of course.
I don't consider myself "macho" (although a
Ruchir Chandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have Virtual domains and locals running on my qmail server. For the
>domains hosted in locals, any incoming mail to a wrongly spelled ID gets
>bounced immediately to the sender.
Right.
>In case of domains under virtualdomains file the incoming mail
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 02:12:17PM +0100, Daniel Cave wrote:
! 1. If someone tries to relay an email from an IP address (ISP dialup) which
! is not listed in /etc/tcp.smtp, and who's domainname happens to be listed in
! rcpthosts, desined for a recipient 'somewhere' on the internet, am I right
!
On 25-Jul-2000, Luis Bezerra wrote:
> Why DNS?
How does qmail know _where_ to deliver if DNS is unavailable?
If you expect people to help, you need to supply the information
needed to help you. What do the logs say?
Ronny
Luis Bezerra writes:
> Why DNS?
>
> For two years, qmail works very well.
>
> This problem appear when my back bone goes down and my router
> doesn't have the international routes. It has the domestic routes, but
> nothing out of Brazil.
Do you have a root domain name server in Brazil?
hi,
in my fastforwad alias table i got this line:
old.address : "| bouncesaying 'This address no longer
exists!'"
but this does not work always! in my logfile i get this message when a mail
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] has arrived:
Jul 25 16:39:15 km3 qmail: 964535955.164711 del
Read the man pages on qmail-remote. Look for info on a file called
'smtproutes'.
- T
--
Tyler J. Frederick
Systems Administrator
Sportsline.com, Inc.
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, [iso-8859-1] Jochen E. Führing wrote:
> Hello!
>
> How can I do forwarding to another host ?
> I have setup several virt
"Neil D. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a little problem with creating a double alias. The situation is
>the following: I have a mail server running qmail, which holds normal
>mail boxes for POP3 clients, it also holds virtual domains which get
>forwarded to local mail boxes for POP3
Hi
I'm new to this list so please excuse me if this subject has been dealt
with a gazillion times before.
I've read the faq:s and the man pages, but have yet to come up with a
solution this (I'm guessing) simple problem of mine:
I have two domains (nille.org & fett.org) that I would like to ha
Nicklas af Ekenstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My /var/qmail/controls/virtualdomain looks like this:
>
>fett.org:nille-fett
>nille.org:nille-nille
>
>In ~nille/ I have the following files:
>.qmail-fett-default
>.qmail-nille-default
>
>The both contain this line:
>nille
>
>I have also set rcpthos
Gang -
Hopeing for a pointer or two ont he following problem:
I moved residences recently, and changed a couple of things on my home Linux
box, which is running Qmail-1.03. When we moved, my gf's outlook began to
give SMTP timeout errors when trying to send messages. The email is being
accepted
> Anyone knows this problem??
Did you change anything ??
=
John van Vlaanderen
#
#CXN, Inc. Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # #
# Proud Sponsor of Perl/Unix of NY #
#http://puny.vm.com
Quoting Chris, the Young One ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> !How do I allow this to happen, if I dont know the IP address of
> ! the user wishing to relay??
Yikes, I see I will have to modify my quoted text regexp. Oh, the
heck with it... I'm not putting an exclamation mark in it.
> Put rul
"Neil D. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Right now, mail sent to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" does not go to the mail
> queue but goes to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". How could I duplicate this so
> that it also goes to the mail queue ? I can´t place
> "&[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the ".qmail-user" file because
Hello all -- I would like a few opinions on the "defaultdelivery"
method. .
. . .for instance, this is standard:
qmail-start ./Maildir/ splogger qmail
. . . I want to try something like this, to achieve a global incoming
mail filter without using any qmail-queue wrappers or modificati
> I have a big problem in my ISP
> After the morning, when my users try to use my
> smtp server, the daemon displays this message:
> Sorry, that domain isn't allowed to be relayed thru this MTA
> Anyone knows this problem??
qmail doesn't produce this message. It's not coming from your qma
I have a sendmail server up already. It's the host for our domain name, so all
mail to that domain goes to it.
To have it forward the mail to the qmail box, shouldn't I just have to change
the MX records to point to the new host with a lower priority number?
eg:
was
sattel.com.IN MX
Just in case anybody cares, I am tired of being spammed by
relaytest.orbs.vuurwerk.nl. I am now blocking 194.178.232.55. If
this causes my server to be listed by ORBS, so be it.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Tornado
Derek Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> . . . I want to try something like this, to achieve a global incoming
> mail filter without using any qmail-queue wrappers or modifications:
>
> qmail-start "|/var/qmail/bin/myfilter |tomaildir $HOME/Maildir" splogger
> qmail
That should work, as long a
In the immortal words of Mike Flynn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I work for IBM and I want to install qmail
> on my server. IBM requires that I present
> our legal department with an actual license
> so that the Intellectual Property lawyers can
> review it and bless it or not. I will not
> be dist
This just came in; submitted for your discussion:
>
> Attention all List Members:
>
> We are in the process of migrating all Red Hat lists from the current list
> manager software/server running qmail/Smartlist to a new server running
> postfix and GNU Mailman (*). Within the next week you wi
On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 09:08:07AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As I've just posted, to my mind that just makes the results conservatively
> trend against qmail. I think that's probably the right direction for now
> in the absence of actual measurements, which if course would be best.
I have
>> ... This migration will not only address
>> performace issues that have arisen due to the number of lists/members on Red
>> Hat lists, but also highly improve ease of use for list members.
They don't mention whether their performance issues were Smartlist or
qmail related. If they have evidenc
At 02:09 PM 7/25/00 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
>This just came in; submitted for your discussion:
I think this can be happened maybe because qmail is too greedy in bandwith
consuming ? because redhat doesn't use EZMLM but SmartList so the single
RCPT To concept is not too usefull.
> >
> >
Quoting Luis Bezerra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Yesterday, when my international backbone goes down, my DNS goes down
> too because the named root servers are located in USA. And I suspect
> that exists one relationship between the problems.
Actually, not all the root name servers are in the US. The
Irwan Hadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 02:09 PM 7/25/00 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
>This just came in; submitted for your discussion:
I think this can be happened maybe because qmail is too greedy in bandwith
consuming ? because redhat doesn't use EZMLM but SmartList so the single
RCPT To
Hi,
occasionally, one has to answer one's own questions:
At 10:15 30.5.2000 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hallo,
>
>a QMAIL user reported problems with the IPv6 stack and QMAIL 1.03:
>
>System:
>- LINUX SUSE 6.4 (Kernel 2.2.15 and glibc 2.1.3)
>- IPv6 enabled
>- xinetd with IPv6 options (call
Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have written a benchmark that iterates over message sizes from 1000 to
>64000 bytes, and from 1 to 16 recipients, and times how long it takes to
>send the same message to all the recipients using qmail-remote. It
>calls qmail-remote once with all the r
Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:24:17AM -0400, Paul Jarc wrote:
> > Does QMTP support per-recipient envelope senders for a single copy of
> > a single message?
>
> qmail will happily expand VERP after a message has been entered thru
> SMTP/QMTP.
But does Q
Ricardo Cerqueira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 05:10:13AM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
> >
> > [New user alert]
> > Running FreeBSD 4.0
> > Just installed qmail-1.03 from the FreeBSD ports collection.
> >
> > My setup is a home user machine, laptop running FreeBSD that ac
Can I run the qmail server behind a firewall?
I want to rely on the dns MX records on the firewall to route mail to the
qmail server, which is on an internal LAN, with a non Internet routable
192.168.1 address.
Will this work?, or, do I need to have the qmail server addressable from the
internet
-x-
A package is the concatenation of three strings:
first, an encoded 8-bit mail message;
second, an encoded envelope sender address;
third, an encoded series of encoded envelope recipient addresses.
-x-
The encoded envelope sender address isn't expanded on beyond the examples
To make this a little more QMTP compatible, and to agree with some of Peter
Norton's comments from late 1998, the sending MTA could also immediately
'transfer' the request to the QMTP by opening a new connection on the QMTP
port when it 'saw' the QMTP response from the foreign SMTP MTA. It would
Bruce Edge wrote:
>
> Can I run the qmail server behind a firewall?
>
> I want to rely on the dns MX records on the firewall to route mail to the
> qmail server, which is on an internal LAN, with a non Internet routable
> 192.168.1 address.
>
> Will this work?, or, do I need to have the qmail s
> I want to rely on the dns MX records on the firewall to route
> mail to the qmail server, which is on an internal LAN, with a non
> Internet routable 192.168.1 address.
>
> Will this work?, or, do I need to have the qmail server
> addressable from the internet directly?
In order for
Bruce Edge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to rely on the dns MX records on the firewall to route mail to the
> qmail server, which is on an internal LAN, with a non Internet routable
> 192.168.1 address.
If you want mail to be able to get in, something that accepts mail has
to be visible to
> Smartlist vs. Mailman is a no-brainer. Mailman vs. ezmlm is far more
> interesting. Mailman is prettier, with its fancy web interface. But
> ezmlm has automatic VERP-based bounce handling and doesn't require a
> web server or the use of a web interface.
Yeah but, python vs. C? I mean do you
I would like to offer an option similar to pobox.com's [spam: 84%]
"Subject:" munging for incoming messages from RBL or RSS listed sites.
Instead of actually bouncing the message as RBLSMTPD does, allow the
message but add [spam - rbl] or [spam - rss] or the like to the Subject:
field of the messa
Please remove me from this list, as fun as it all sounds. :)
--==(( Brad Schuster ))==--
Hey Brad, did Microsoft have an in-house course on unsubscribing from e-mail
lists? Usually it works better if you follow the unsubscribe instructions.
--Adam
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 02:30:52PM -0700, Brad Schuster (Volt) wrote:
> Please remove me from this list, as fun as it all sounds. :)
>
REMOVE
remove
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 03:25:56PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> Smartlist vs. Mailman is a no-brainer. Mailman vs. ezmlm is far more
> interesting. Mailman is prettier, with its fancy web interface. But
> ezmlm has automatic VERP-based bounce handling and doesn't require a
> web server or the use of
This may get somewhat off topic ...
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 11:15:15AM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> The move to lower bandwidth consumption of websites in general has picked up
> speed as well. Many many sites and organisations are taking a stand to
> reduce bandwidth use of websites and t
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 01:39:46PM -0600, Irwan Hadi wrote:
> At 02:09 PM 7/25/00 -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
>
> >This just came in; submitted for your discussion:
>
> I think this can be happened maybe because qmail is too greedy in bandwith
> consuming ? because redhat doesn't use EZMLM but
Here's the modified version of qmqpc that will pick a random server instead
of the first available. I haven't tested it yet, but it compiles, and
printf statements in strategic places give me the output I'm looking for.
The rand() function is seeded with the current milliseconds from the system
c
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:04:00PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have written a benchmark that iterates over message sizes from 1000 to
> >64000 bytes, and from 1 to 16 recipients, and times how long it takes to
> >send the same message to all the recipien
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 05:27:28PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> I would like to offer an option similar to pobox.com's [spam: 84%]
> "Subject:" munging for incoming messages from RBL or RSS listed sites.
> Instead of actually bouncing the message as RBLSMTPD does, allow the
> message but add
Has anyone made an auto-responder to work with ezmlm (or others??) that
would reply to messages containing such "remove" messages to the list
and ask the sender if they wished to unsubscribe (with the proper
instructions)??
Guy Rosinbaum wrote:
> REMOVEremove
Replies are in private ... anyone actually interested may ask for ensuing
discussion :-).
Markus Stumpf wrote:
> This may get somewhat off topic ...
Oh boy...
After a forward from this list...
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:34:28 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > We are in the process of migrating all Red Hat lists from the current list
> > manager software/server running qmail/Smartlist to a new server running
> > postfix and GNU Mailman (*).
Ve
Looks like it's going to work, but I still like the round robin idea
better. With the round robin idea you avoid the possibility of polling the
same down server repeatedly. I admit that this seems like an unlikely
event, but if you have few servers, it can be significant. (with 3 servers
this wil
On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 10:06:57AM -0700, John White wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 12:45:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > o DNS overhead is not counted
>
> I'm still not clear why this isn't counted. I mean, it -is-
> part of the traffic, is it not? Is it your contention that
> there
Anyone have any interesting insight on the switch from tai64 to tai64n
in daemontools? It appears (from my limited understanding) to break
lots of existing log analysis tools (including qmailanalog) without
adding anything of use.
I must be missing something. My faith in the almighty DJB is sha
Does Russ' qmail-mrtg work with the new daemontools and it's fondness
for tai64n? I know there are pipes, filters, etc to convert... Native
support WOULD be nice, though.
Ben
--
Ben Beuchler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILER-DAEMON
No, this is not a re-hash of the old debate. I've seen the archives.
:)
But, according to DJB's (and others') suggestions I'm trying to hook awk
up to the recordio + qmail-smtpd output and log it to syslog (via
splogger).
This seems to me like it should be easy. However, as soon as I add the
a
Hi there,
Would anyone give me some example to use recordio to record qmail SMTP server log?
When I put the recordio before calling qmail-smtpd, qmail-smtpd did not work.
Regards,
Edward.
From: Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Is there something wrong with the pipes I've set up? If I take out the
>"awk..." part and replace it with "cat" then everything works as
>expected (iow, I get _all_ the smtp output).
On the "Before" you had bound to 0, on the "After" you bound to 127.0.0.1.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 01:11:54AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
> This seems to me like it should be easy. However, as soon as I add the
> additional pipe to awk, I no longer get _anything_ logged to syslog.
I am only guessing ... could it be some buffering problem?
gawk is not doing output on every
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 03:39:34AM -, asantos wrote:
> On the "Before" you had bound to 0, on the "After" you bound to 127.0.0.1.
> Are you sure you were smtp'ing trough 127.0.0.1 ?
Sorry, I should have clarified that. Until I get this working I'm
binding tcpserver to 127.0.0.1 -- in case I
From: Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sorry, I should have clarified that. Until I get this working I'm
>binding tcpserver to 127.0.0.1 -- in case I screw something up I don't
>want any mail coming in from the outside. Normally I bind it to "0" so
>connections from the outside are still permitt
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:30:41AM -0700, Aaron L. Meehan wrote:
! Quoting Chris, the Young One ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
! > !How do I allow this to happen, if I dont know the IP address of
! > ! the user wishing to relay??
!
! Yikes, I see I will have to modify my quoted text regexp. Oh
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 01:01:04PM -0400, Derek Watson wrote:
! . . . I want to try something like this, to achieve a global incoming
! mail filter without using any qmail-queue wrappers or modifications:
!
! qmail-start "|/var/qmail/bin/myfilter |tomaildir $HOME/Maildir" splogger
! qmail
Here I
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 05:15:53PM -0700, Bruce Edge wrote:
! I know this may be a sendmail issue, but what else do I need to change to get
! wutang to forward the mail?
Tell sendmail on wutang that sattel.com is not a local domain? :-)
I think the relevant setting is in class w in sendmail.cf; h
Hi all,
I am running a free popmail server using Autoturn and getting my mail via
a dialup link from my mail server metta.lk to col7.metta.lk and things
are working well for the larst year or so.
I find that qmail is taking my maildir and sending
I would like to have qmail changed to do a
93 matches
Mail list logo
