Are there any plans to release a version of qmail-popup/qmail-pop3d that
supports ssl? I was unable to get stunnel to function properly, and even if
I had been able to I didn't like the fact that it seems to wrap to an inetd
like security in which it was reading hosts.allow. It seems like there
Thus said "D. J. Bernstein" on 01 Mar 2001 02:27:37 GMT:
>http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/2237
``Currently the SecurityFocus staff are not aware of any vendor
supplied patches for this issue.''
Why haven't they updated this? On a properly configured qmail system
this is a non-issue
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Peter Cavender wrote:
> What is this qmail version 2.0 that securityfocus.com claims there is an
> explot for? Am I missing something, or are they?
>
> Being that I have better things to do than to try to screw up my mail
> server, has anyone tried this claimed explot? What
I'm sure there are a few storage vendors who can scale that
high, EMC, Clariion, Compaq(DEC)?, etc. You would never
attach that amount of bandwidth to one server anyway
though, the I/O would be horrible, even with something
like a Sun E1 which has a few PCI busses on each
of it's 16 separate
On Thu, 01 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is their such a thing as a 50 terrabyte hard drive?
No. (Unless you work in the USDF)
> Well, my users are all in one domain, so I cannot split the domains
> across several HDD's.
RAID???
> Secondly, what if 2 1/2 million users
> simultaneously
Hi,
I have used Qmail for over 3 years now and I love it. Now I have came across
one project, building a Mail server to handle around 5-6 million users with
a 10 meg mailbox each (I use vpopmail www.inter7.com for the pop server and
virtual domain part). Now multiplying 10MB x 500 users =
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:08:12AM -0700, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Not necessary. They will be queued up in qmail's mail queue until they
> can be delivered to their mail server (or until the message has been in your
> queue too long and the message bounces). Simple really.
We've had simmilar p
Peter Cavender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is this qmail version 2.0 that securityfocus.com claims there is an
> explot for? Am I missing something, or are they?
>
> Being that I have better things to do than to try to screw up my mail
> server, has anyone tried this claimed explot? Wha
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:11:10PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> As long as you are injecting messages, qmail won't perform at full
> speed. Play with that rate, maybe no limiting *is* the best option.
Maybe an idea would also be to "disable" the trigger mechanism in
qmail-queue/qmail-send (chan
What is this qmail version 2.0 that securityfocus.com claims there is an
explot for? Am I missing something, or are they?
Being that I have better things to do than to try to screw up my mail
server, has anyone tried this claimed explot? What really happens?
--Pete
At the risk of sounding really stupid, do I need to invoke BOTH the
corrected script (minus the qmail-smtpd part) AND the old one (pop-3, etc.)?
In other words, will I have two tcpserver scripts, one invoking the pop-3
and the other the qmail smtpd?
As I said, I am a complete newbie with em
The following web pages say that there is a vulnerability in qmail:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/2237
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/6969
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/6970
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-1999-0144
http://www.insecure.org/splo
Claudio Nieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> www.qmail.org mentions Scott Gifford's patch making qmail recognize
> 0.0.0.0 as local IP address. But the link to the patch
>
> http://www.tir.com/~sgifford/qmail/qmail-0.0.0.0.patch
>
> is invalid:
>
> Not Found
>
> The requested URL /~sgifford
I have a lot of trigger-happy users who seem to enjoy double
clicking attachments. Most of the time, a few hours after a major
virus is discovered, we have an update made, but in the meanwhile we
could have had hundreds of e-mails come in with the virus.
Our environment runs Windows, and we find
I'm having trouble with qmail and procmail. I've read
the FAQ and the list archives, but am still unsure
what
to do. I'm using a Linux RedHat 6.2 system.
installed qmail.
outgoing mail works.
incoming mail (from outside) bounces (unknown user)
local mail won't be delivered, i.e
when I try (f
Hi all...
For the past 3 weeks I have been fighting the battle to move our dieing
email server from a proprietary solution to qmail. I had devoted 3 months of
research and development (with a lot of help from this list) to making sure
that the qmail server has all the features required by our org
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:04:57PM -0700, Stewart Vardaman wrote:
> Qmail was installed on a /var partition that turned out to be too small, so
> I added a new 36 gig disk, made the old /var something else, and copied
> everything with cp -R. Brought the system back up with the new 36 gig /var
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:04:57PM -0700, Stewart Vardaman wrote:
>Qmail was installed on a /var partition that turned out to be too small, so
>I added a new 36 gig disk, made the old /var something else, and copied
>everything with cp -R. Brought the system back up with the new 36 gig /var
>p
Off the top of my head I think you have a rights problem. You should
have copied the /var/qmail directory with cp -Rp - the -p keeps current
permissions, etc..
.mark
>--
>From: Stewart Vardaman[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 3:04 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROT
Qmail was installed on a /var partition that turned out to be too small, so
I added a new 36 gig disk, made the old /var something else, and copied
everything with cp -R. Brought the system back up with the new 36 gig /var
partition, and qmail is only partially running. It does listen on port
Hey, here is a cool/useful site for some of us network monkeys...
http://bsdnerds.com it's got some pretty good Unix networking & programming
stuff that most of us need from time to time..great site for useful
reference.
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Hi everybody!!!
There is a further development on the case with the strange
(at least for me) behaviour of some smtp servers ( for
example usa.net servers) not being able to send mail to my
poor qmail1.03 server.
I made an account on usa.net send my self a letter and
finnaly it bounced ba
Roger Waterhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ... the best I can come up with is to append the console device
> to the end of the command that invokes multilog ie:
>
> /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail /dev/tty9
>
> where /dev/tty9 is virtual console 9. Does anyone know if this will wo
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:33:52PM -0700, Roger Waterhouse wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like multilog to output to one of the virtual consoles under linux
> as well as the usual log file. I have looked through the archives, man
> pages, etc and the best I can come up with is to append the console d
Hello
I would like multilog to output to one of the virtual consoles under linux
as well as the usual log file. I have looked through the archives, man
pages, etc and the best I can come up with is to append the console device
to the end of the command that invokes multilog ie:
/usr/local/bin/mu
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 07:22:13PM -, Dean Browett wrote:
> There appears to be a problem with the length of the pop3 user acct name
> under qmail.
I don't think there is.
> I have an idea that the max allowable characters in the xxx part of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be 64 characters (I've
Bill Isaacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Lost, lost, lost!
>
> OK, I'm a newbie with most of this stuff, but I'm having a problem invoking
> smtp with tcpserver. Trying this:
>
> tcpserver -v -R -x /etc/tcpcontrol/smtp.cdb 0 pop-3
> /v
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:04:18PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> Has anyone installed "Time::HiRes" for Qmail-Scanner
yes. install the cpan module, and then run cpan, and type "install Time::HiRes".
Other questions ? :)
Regards,
Olivier
--
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:35:02PM -, Bill Isaacs wrote:
>
> Lost, lost, lost!
>
> OK, I'm a newbie with most of this stuff, but I'm having a problem invoking
> smtp with tcpserver. Trying this:
>
> tcpserver -v -R -x /etc/tcpcontrol/
Does anyone have any good resources for how to setup a list mirror? How to
get one mirrored on a public archiving site would be helpful too.
David Coley
Lost, lost, lost!
OK, I'm a newbie with most of this stuff, but I'm having a problem invoking
smtp with tcpserver. Trying this:
tcpserver -v -R -x /etc/tcpcontrol/smtp.cdb 0 pop-3
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup hoss.willysworkshop.com \
/bin
unsubcribe
Cristopher Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to specify or override the attachment limit? We have a
> message getting rejected with an attachment too large message, it is a
> 13mb attachment. I was previously unaware there was a limit :) Thanks1
qmail does not enforce a message
The problem turned to be a full disk.
Thanks to all who answered my question, and gave me good advice
Charles Cazabon wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > qmail: [numbers] alert: unable to append to bounce message HELP!
> > sleeping...
>
> Your queue disk is probably f
Is there a way to specify or override the attachment limit? We have a
message getting rejected with an attachment too large message, it is a
13mb attachment. I was previously unaware there was a limit :) Thanks1
Regards,
Cristopher Daniluk
President & CEO
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
direct: 330/53
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:34:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I tried installing qmai-scanner and had some difficulty with the setuid
> root issues. qmail-scanner was wanting a new kernel built, which I can't
Err - I can emphatically state that neither Qmail-Scanner or A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> qmail: [numbers] alert: unable to append to bounce message HELP!
> sleeping...
Your queue disk is probably full or out of inodes.
Charles
--
---
Charles Cazabon
Hi,
I have been getting this message in my logfile:
qmail: [numbers] alert: unable to append to bounce message HELP!
sleeping...
qmail seems to be doing this every 10 seconds or so.
Any advice or pointers to the right direction for information will be
apreachiated
It seems that someone's mail server re-injecting messages to this
mailing list. I just got another copy of a message that I sent
yesterday. Has anyone else noticed this? The headers are included and
what I have seen is that the Message-id has changed maybe to the mail
server that is re-inje
Hi,
There appears to be a problem with the length of the pop3 user acct name
under qmail. I have an idea that the max allowable characters in the xxx
part of [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be 64 characters (I've looked at rfc's 821
and 1939 and did not find a definitive answer). I had a situation where
Bill Isaacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a feeling I'll get laughed at, but here goes.
No, laughing is reserved for people who send mail like "qmail isn't working
for me. Why?" to the mailing list.
> I'm not using svscan. This is what I have in (*gulp*) inetd.conf:
>
> smtpstrea
I have a feeling I'll get laughed at, but here goes.
I'm not using svscan. This is what I have in (*gulp*) inetd.conf:
smtpstream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
>From: Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: R
Bill Isaacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> that fixed that. I then did a tcprulescheck and got:
>
> [root@hoss /etc]# TCPREMOTEIP=64.161.212.206 tcprulescheck
> /etc/tcpcontrol/smtp.
> cdb
> rule 64.161.212.206:
> set environment
OK, I've done some newbie-snooping and found that relay-ctrl-age wasn't
updating the database. I removed the path in the smtpcdb rules file, and
that fixed that. I then did a tcprulescheck and got:
[root@hoss /etc]# TCPREMOTEIP=
Thus said "Chrisanthy Carlane" on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:13:52 +0700:
> What I want to ask is: HOW to create that buffering thing ? Do I have to add
> every user for every domain(which will be a lot of user)?
With a standard qmail install it's as simple as:
Add their domain to /var/qmail/control/r
Hi,
www.qmail.org mentions Scott Gifford's patch making qmail recognize
0.0.0.0 as local IP address. But the link to the patch
http://www.tir.com/~sgifford/qmail/qmail-0.0.0.0.patch
is invalid:
Not Found
The requested URL /~sgifford/qmail/qmail-0.0.0.0.patch was not found on this server.
Jeremy,
I tried installing qmai-scanner and had some difficulty with the setuid
root issues. qmail-scanner was wanting a new kernel built, which I can't
easily do as it's a remote server. I switched to amavis and think that's
a better solution. It's easy to install and essentially works b
I've set up a mirror of cr.yp.to using ftpcopy, and a list to which
any updates will be sent. I'll mirror twice daily for now. Any changes
to the files distributed via cr.yp.to, including the addition of new
files, the updating of existing files, or the removal of existing
files, will be detected
David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > With or without big-todo, you risk ending up with a f*cking big todo
> > queue after that. Switching off todo-handling for a while,
> > automatically, sounds like a *very* bad idea to me.
>
> Why is a
Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:50:36AM -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:13:47PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> > >I've been thinking about this issue, and was wondering if it would be
> > >possible to fix this in some simple w
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 03:58:51PM -, Jérémy Cluzel wrote:
> My goal is to take virus aware from my mail server, so, what's the
> best choice ?
there are no "best choice" : there are just different solutions :)
All that I can tell you is that qmail-scanner + f-sav is a very
good working so
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Karl Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 25 Feb 2001:
> >If I'm reading the RFCs correctly, the right order is "Reply-to:", then
> >"From:", then "Sender:".
>
> How about using the envelope sender (ie. return-path)?
>
> I missed the origi
"Someone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I want infomations about qmail compares with sendmail.
> Can you help me?
> Where www talk about them?
> Such as efficiency, speedy, security, why?, ...etc.
Well, start by reading http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html, particularly the
FAQ, and http://cr
Hi,
I was using Red Hat 6.2, and qmail as Mta.
My goal is to take virus aware from my mail server, so, what's the
best choice ?
1) as virus-scanner ? amavis or qmail-scanner ? both seem to work
fine...
2) as antivirus ? H+BEDV AntiVir, AVP, Sophos Sweep,or McAfee
ViruScan ? I used avp for a
FYI
I have a LWQ type pop3 install and have passed on the info to quite a few
people, so I know it works. If anyone is looking for that kind of solution,
just let me know and I will pass my information on again.
Dave if you need any info on my install (doubtful) let me know as I would
love the op
It's strange that you use /etc/smtp.cdb to control pop access (!) and
that you show us a different CDB file /etc/tcpcontrol/smtp.cdb in your
system, are you sure you are using the right CDB file in your qmail-smtpd
run script? it might help showing us that script too.
Enrique-
|o| Bill Isaa
Mostly this occurs when delivery to yahoo is attempted, I have seen only one
other site crash it.
I have tried both Messenger 4.76 and Outlook Express they both are able to
use the secure SMTP connection. Many other severs are able to connect just
fine. Any body got any ideas? I have not tried to
Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Cavender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Also, since my inetd.conf file is now *empty*, can I disable it
> >altogether, or or will I lose essential internal services?
>
> Sure, nuke it.
Go one step further and uninstall inetd completely. I've done i
Peter Cavender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The LWQ description of setting up pop3 for qmail only
>says to put the tcpserver command in the qmail startup file.
>
>Shouldn't this "service" be supervised by svscan?
Ideally, yes.
>Why do the other qmail processes get this, but pop3 does not?
Becau
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 06:46:49AM -, Bill Isaacs wrote:
> Hi Bruce and Charles,
>
> No luck yet. I tried Bruce's suggestion with the same outcome as before:
> ---
> tcpserver -v -R -x /etc/smtp.cdb 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popu
Christoph Hertel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a little computer here and dial up to a lot of different ISPs.
> The given IPs are on the MAPS DUL and my smtp-server (at the moment
> exim, maybe soon qmail) can't get rid of some of my mail (I don't use a
> smarthost).
If you're on dial-up
Hi,
I have a little computer here and dial up to a lot of different ISPs.
The given IPs are on the MAPS DUL and my smtp-server (at the moment
exim, maybe soon qmail) can't get rid of some of my mail (I don't use a
smarthost).
One solution would involve a script which changes the smarthost settin
Well,
I agree wholeheartedly, it's a must to have the desktop covered, but if
you don't try to catch the virii coming in, you'll never have any idea
about what comes in by mail, as most users will soon not tell you about
it anymore.
I use amavis on the internet connected systems, and inflex on
hello,everyone
I have build the qmail-ldap server.And it works well.
But how can I test the capability of my qmail server,both
send and receive?
How can I know how many letters/second it sends and receive?
root
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I absolutely disagree.
You guys remember those Outlook bugs a few months ago? We didn't have one
get in here, although I was returning dozens of rejected mails to other
companies that got hit. Given how hard it is to arrange timely upgrading
of desktop antivirus software over an enterprise on e
Bill Isaacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No luck yet. I tried Bruce's suggestion with the same outcome as before:
> ---
> tcpserver -v -R -x /etc/smtp.cdb 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
> hoss.willysworkshop.com \
> /bin/checkpas
Do you need that user to be able to check both mailboxes independently?
If not, I think you can just put a .qmail-john_doe in qmail/alias/ to
forward that mail to johndoe's mailbox.
Andrew Wafula wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to be able to implement a system where a user has one login but with
> th
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:23:20AM +0100,
Jérémy Cluzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and wath about scanners ? which is the best one ? and why ?
> are they really needed for such antivirus ?
> I've heard that some AV (live avp) have their own scanner (which tends to
> replace amavis or qmail sca
This problem of todo had created a havoc with my site and qmail was unable
to cope up with the volume of incoming mails which my site was getting. In
fact
I had starting cursing the design of the todo processing. But with a slight
change to qmail-queue I have managed to get the queue (both
remote
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:02:15PM -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
> Any issues with NFS mounting the alias directory so a common version can be
> shared by all mail servers?
Make sure you use users/assign. No other problems are to be expected.
Greetz, Peter.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:50:36AM -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:13:47PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> >I've been thinking about this issue, and was wondering if it would be
> >possible to fix this in some simple way. Would it be possible to modify
>
> If one has
Pipe the logs files through tai64nlocal (man tai64nlocal), for instance
cat current | /usr/local/bin/tai64nlocal
.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:06:26PM +0300, Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
> I couldn't found anywhere how can I get human-readable date and time stamps
> in qmail logs. Can anybody do
qmail Digest 28 Feb 2001 11:00:00 - Issue 1289
Topics (messages 57977 through 58041):
Re: relay-ctrl and qmail
57977 by: Erwin Hoffmann
57979 by: Charles Cazabon
57984 by: Enrique Vadillo
57992 by: Erwin Hoffmann
58011 by: Bill Isaacs
58014 by
and wath about scanners ? which is the best one ? and why ?
are they really needed for such antivirus ?
I've heard that some AV (live avp) have their own scanner (which tends to
replace amavis or qmail scanner).
- Original Message -
From: "Alex at messagelabs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EM
I couldn't found anywhere how can I get human-readable date and time stamps
in qmail logs. Can anybody do that?
Thanks for you help,
Alexander
>2) as antivirus ? H+BEDV AntiVir, AVP, Sophos Sweep,or McAfee ViruScan ? I used avp
>for a while
>(and I find it very efficient), but doesn't know the other ones...
Don't know about H+BEDV AntiVir
McAfee is currently best for detecting new viruses, and has been for a while
AVP is also good at
Hi,I was using Red Hat 6.2, and qmail as
Mta.My goal is to take virus aware from my mail server, so, what's the best
choice ?
1) as virus-scanner ? amavis or qmail-scanner ?
both seem to work fine...2) as antivirus ? H+BEDV AntiVir, AVP,
Sophos Sweep,or McAfee ViruScan ? I used avp for a wh
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:13:47PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
>I've been thinking about this issue, and was wondering if it would be
>possible to fix this in some simple way. Would it be possible to modify
If one has big-todo, is there any point in spending so much time
working the todo? Switc
Hi,
in an attempt to look for the TCPSERVER man-pages, I just found Dan's
description on the Web. Some pieces are available elsewhere, but they are
not in sync with the current ucspi.
For anybody how needs it, the man-pages can be downloaded (as tar-archive)
from my qmail Web-page:
http://www.
79 matches
Mail list logo
