On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 07:59:38AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
>
> > Can you please get over this? The evidence you posted last year was
> > flawed, it did not link ORBS to a few probes from Romania. You have no
> > proof that ORBS is somehow worse t
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
>
> > Can you please get over this? The evidence you posted last year was
> > flawed, it did not link ORBS to a few probes from Romania. You have no
> > proof that ORBS is somehow worse t
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:06:52PM -0400, David Means wrote:
> Besides, ORBS is dead!
>
> http://www.orbs.org/
>
> Or, is that the wrong site?
That is the right site, and ORBS is indeed currently dead.
Greetz, Peter.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
> Can you please get over this? The evidence you posted last year was
> flawed, it did not link ORBS to a few probes from Romania. You have no
> proof that ORBS is somehow worse than any other list of IPs.
1) My host was by me secured (qmail+tcpserver with
Lye On Siong Johnny writes:
> Are there any other way to implement virtual domain apart from using vpopmail?
There are many ways. qmail is in effect a tool for sending and
receiving email. You can use it in many different ways, vpopmail
being just one of them. You could use vmailmgr
(http://w
hi,
Are there any other way to implement virtual domain apart from using vpopmail?
or is it true that if having virtual domain, then the log in name will be
the full email address since that's the only way to differentiate the accounts?
Thanks
Johnny
hi-
i think that someone posted earlier today regarding sporadic sig 11's on
freebsd 4.2-RELEASE while running qmail-qfilter.
interestingly, i just installed qmail-qfilter earlier today on the same
release of freebsd, and i'm getting the same thing:
Jun 4 19:46:03 mx1 /kernel: pid 64541 (qmai
Thank you your reply.
But I want to know whether I specify return a failure message to the originator if the
user quota size has exceed .
ÔÚ 2001-06-04 00:02:00 ÄúдµÀ£º
>On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, george wrote:
>
>> 1. I want to know how to process when qmail received a not exist user
>
>qmail wi
Ashe Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The system "works" but will not receive mail from outside the select few I
> list in the /etc/hosts.allow file.
Others have replied with correct information as well, but this is the crux of
your problem. To receive mail from the net at large, you have
Cary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> according to the mail I recieved when I signed up, I can request a copy of
> message 12345 by sending mail to
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Where do I find these numbers by which to request a message, or groups of
> messages?
In the envelope sender, typically r
Charles Cazabon wrote:
{ snip }
>
> > That way, I can have only my domain in rcpthosts, but allow my other clients
> > access.
>
> You're misunderstanding the purpose of rcpthosts. It's only supposed to
> contain the domains for which you act as either a primary or backup mail
> exchanger.
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
Sorry, maybe you are in the wrong directory? you
should not be in the qmail-1.03 dir. because the patch specifies the path
already "qmail-1.03/file-to-patch". so if you are in the qmail dir , do a "cd
.." and try the patch again. if it still can't work then fo
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
What operating system are you compiling on? maybe
you want to try another version of patch from ftp.gnu.org . Because the same thing happened
to me when i compiled on solaris 8 and using another version of patch
helped.
Hope it works for you
Paul
-
It's also in tcp-env
Scott Schwartz wrote:
>
> > tcpserver does much more than this; in particular, the ability to arbitrarily
> > set environment variables on a per-IP or per-hostname basis is particularly
> > valuable in controlling certain aspects of qmail's behaviour.
>
> Historical note:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 04:25:58PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Mark Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but
> > when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the
> > test you're doing from a sol
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 03:11:36PM -0700, Ashe Coutts wrote:
> I have set up a qmail system (RedHat linux 7.1, kernel 2.4.5, xinetd,
> qmail 1.03 RPMs, U of Wash pop3 and imap, etc.). with a domain name of
> sbcacademy.org (machine name mail.sbcacademy.org) with the following
> configuratio
what you want to do is allow all incoming connections (i.e. don't have
your /etc/hosts.allow & /etc/hosts.deny setup to drop all miscellaneous
smtp connections) on port 25. if you only set RELAYCLIENT for the ip's
you want, qmail will handle rejecing the emails.
make sense?
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001,
Alastair Rundlett wrote:
>
> Thnx Charles
>
> So where I could find these patches you talking about?
>
> Why don't you use them ?
>
> >> There are patches to change this if you like, but I don't use them.
>
> I had over 200 msg's bounced to postmaster this over weekend to invalid
> mailboxes.
Mark Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but
> when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the
> test you're doing from a solaris system?
Nope, Linux. Perhaps the version of patch which Sun ships
David Means <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I believe your points are valid. But I'm just stuborn, I suppose :)
Perhaps. More importantly, you're re-inventing the wheel, possibly with bugs.
> So stuborn as a matter of fact, that I patched qmail-smptd this weekend
> to read a new control file w
I have set up a qmail system (RedHat linux 7.1, kernel 2.4.5, xinetd, qmail 1.03 RPMs, U of Wash pop3 and imap, etc.). with a domain name of sbcacademy.org (machine name mail.sbcacademy.org) with the following configuration files:
=== start /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
localhost
sbca
> tcpserver does much more than this; in particular, the ability to arbitrarily
> set environment variables on a per-IP or per-hostname basis is particularly
> valuable in controlling certain aspects of qmail's behaviour.
Historical note: that functionality used to be available in
a separate pro
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:14:00PM -0400, Mark Douglas allegedly wrote:
> No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but
> when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the
> test you're doing from a solaris system? At this point I'm just kind
according to the mail I recieved when I signed up, I can request a copy of
message 12345 by sending mail to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Where do I find these numbers by which to request a message, or groups of
messages?
Thank you.
Cary Mathews
Abilene Christian University
ACM Chair
| Education Co
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Dave Sill wrote:
> Cary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >However, when I try to check the mail that was sent, it has not been
> >delivered. I use bin/qmail-qstat to look a the queue, and it is growing
> >bigger and bigger:
> >---results of bin/qmail-qstat---
> >messages in
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
No, I can make this patch cleanly on a linux based system no problem, but when I try the same approach on the solaris system, it doesn't work. Was the test you're doing from a solaris system? At this point I'm just kind of wondering what the problem is with the
Besides, ORBS is dead!
http://www.orbs.org/
Or, is that the wrong site?
David
Mark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:17:50AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz allegedly wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> >
> > > Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
Charles:
I believe your points are valid. But I'm just stuborn, I suppose :)
So stuborn as a matter of fact, that I patched qmail-smptd this weekend
to read a new control file which I called ipaddrallowed. In which I can
put things like 192.168. or a full IP addr. If the source address of
the
> to put it into appropriate patch files, but when I run patch -p1 <
> big-concurrency.patch it asks me what file I want to patch.
Strictly speaking, it's /possible/ that your version of patch is getting
screwed up by the email header. Try removing everything above the first
'diff' line. Then c
Mark Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried all kinds of -p options, and left it out, and it doesn't help.
>
> Also, as for it not being the standard big-concurrency patch, would you tell
> me which one is? Even the one right on qmail's home site is that same patch
> muddled in with the
Hello,
I discussed XINETD on my web page intensively. Look at:
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail_en.html
cheers.
eh.
At 16:58 2.6.2001 -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
>Hi all.
>
>I had installed qmail and it's running ok.
>All the examples says to add a line in /etc/inetd.conf to run
>qmail-smtpd, but
Michael T. Babcock([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.04 11:11:59 +:
> We ran into a misconfiguration on one machine where svscan had been
> added by one person to rc.sysinit and inittab by another, so two copies
> of svscan were being started.
>
> I realise that this is a misconfiguration, but would
Johan Almqvist writes:
> BTW: Why is there still no link to my qmail page on www.qmail.org?
Laziness.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Microsoft rivets everything.
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | Linu
Title: RE: big-concurrency patch
I've tried all kinds of -p options, and left it out, and it doesn't help.
Also, as for it not being the standard big-concurrency patch, would you tell me which one is? Even the one right on qmail's home site is that same patch muddled in with the e-mail.
Tha
Mark Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having problems applying this patch. I can't find any documentation for
> it, and the patch file itself seems to be rather chopped up. I did my best
> to put it into appropriate patch files, but when I run patch -p1 <
> big-concurrency.patch it asks me
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 11:43:20AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
>
> Chances are that the Perl interpreter can't run in 2MB on your system; try
> upping that to 6MB or 8MB and try again. I bet a pint that fixes your
> problem.
Ah, good call. Doh! A check of ps shows the filter process running
(
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You sent the following message to a mailing list that I'm subscribed
to. You also sent a copy directly to me. I don't want an extra copy.
If you respond to a message of mine, please respect the
Mail-Followup-To header field. If you respond to a message sent by
someone else, p
Title: big-concurrency patch
I'm having problems applying this patch. I can't find any documentation for it, and the patch file itself seems to be rather chopped up. I did my best to put it into appropriate patch files, but when I run patch -p1 < big-concurrency.patch it asks me what file I wa
Jon Rust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:36:26AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
>
> > Is this happening whenever any process injects mail? Or only when qmail-smtpd
> > (and possibly qmail-qmtpd and qmail-qmqpd) inject mail? If the latter, are
> > you running with memory l
Alastair Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
re: patches to qmail-smtpd to do local-part verfication
> >> There are patches to change this if you like, but I don't use them.
>
> So where I could find these patches you talking about?
See either qmail.org or the qmail mailing list archives; that
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:36:26AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Jon Rust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm getting these in my syslog:
> >
> >.../kernel: pid 93400 (qmail-qfilter), uid 82: exited on signal 11
>
> segfault? Is signal 11 a segmentation violation on your OS?
Yes. (FreeBSD
+-- On Jun 4, Paul Jarc said:
> Michael "T\." Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I realise that this is a misconfiguration, but wouldn't it be possible
> > for svscan to add a 'lock' file to the services directory so it only
> > starts once?
>
> setlock -n /path/to/lockfile svscan /se
Thnx Charles
So where I could find these patches you talking about?
Why don't you use them ?
>> There are patches to change this if you like, but I don't use them.
I had over 200 msg's bounced to postmaster this over weekend to invalid
mailboxes. What happens when this reaches thousands ? sure
Michael "T\." Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I realise that this is a misconfiguration, but wouldn't it be possible
> for svscan to add a 'lock' file to the services directory so it only
> starts once?
setlock -n /path/to/lockfile svscan /service
http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/setlock.html>
No, checked that, I guess I will need to look at their scripts in greater
detail
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Tegtmeyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: qmail and cgi
> "Gordon McDowall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
* Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010604 14:06]:
> Newbieportal writes:
> > Everyone knows that we can connect to smtp server directly using telnet or
> > simple socket connection script.
> > Can I do the same for qmqp server or qmtpd server.
> Not using telnet. At least, not without count
We ran into a misconfiguration on one machine where svscan had been
added by one person to rc.sysinit and inittab by another, so two copies
of svscan were being started.
I realise that this is a misconfiguration, but wouldn't it be possible
for svscan to add a 'lock' file to the services director
Charles Cazabon writes:
> Another possibility (given that you're running on PC hardware) is hardware
> problems; "it's worked fine for years" does not mean there wasn't a latent
> problem all along.
Yep; in fact "it's worked fine for years" and now doesn't is probably
a very good indication of
"Gordon McDowall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since we changed from sendmail to qmail there has been a few people saying they have
>the mails
> generated by their scripts rejected by the mail server
Possibly you don't allow the webserver to relay.
Regards, Frank
Gordon McDowall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone had any experience of customers having problems sending mail
> through qmaill using formmail etc?
Only if their scripts are broken, or use very odd sendmail-specific
commandline options.
> Since we changed from sendmail to qmail there has b
Massimo Quintini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Physical name of my qmail server is "terri1.te.astro.it" but mail domain
> is "astrte.te.astro.it" (record CNAME in dns)
Bad idea. See below.
> In the reply of msg the To: field contains [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and not [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why???
Su 04 Jun 2001 08:22:59 -0600, Charles Cazabon ha scritto:
> David Means <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Charles Cazabon wrote:
> > >
> > > Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I had installed qmail and it's running ok. All the examples
says to add
> > > > a line in /etc/
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:17:50AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz allegedly wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> > Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
> > relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any
> > law.
>
> Maybe in Netherla
Alastair Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How do I stop spamers from sending mail to my domain and then disappearing
> before the msg can be returned to the sender, all the messages are to a
> random and invalid mailbox at my domain.
This happens to everyone; it's not a problem. qmail wi
Lye On Siong Johnny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have multiple lines of this when I do a ps ax
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup foo.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3 Maildir
>
> They seems to be there for a long time. I never seen that many of such
> lines previously.
>
Jon Rust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting these in my syslog:
>
>.../kernel: pid 93400 (qmail-qfilter), uid 82: exited on signal 11
segfault? Is signal 11 a segmentation violation on your OS?
> I was getting LOTS of them, and I thought it was related to my filter
> attempting to re
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tcpserver does much more than this;
One additional thing: It doesn't have to run as root when the service
doesn't require it.
Regards, Frank
Has anyone had any experience of customers having
problems sending mail through qmaill using formmail etc?
Since we changed from sendmail to qmail there has
been a few people saying they have the mails generated by their scripts rejected
by the mail server
Any help?
Gordon McDowall
Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm getting tons of these log entries whenever I send mail:
[...]
> May 25 18:49:19 bigpoop qmail: 990830959.662255 delivery 801: deferral:
> qmail-remote_crashed./
[...]
> It was rough combining these, but the most trouble was in smtpd, not
> qma
George Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. I want to know how to process when qmail received a not exist user in
> qmail server. which program to process, is qmail-send ?
>
> whether original sender can receiver a notic mail?
I'm afraid I have to guess at what you meant here. When qmail receiv
David Means <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charles Cazabon wrote:
> >
> > Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I had installed qmail and it's running ok. All the examples says to add
> > > a line in /etc/inetd.conf to run qmail-smtpd, but I don't know how to
> > > configure it i
Sometimes we are given Orders from On High. This has started me thinking though.
Maybe
there is away to stop the disclaimer being attached under certain conditions. If the
software adding the disclaimer permits the monkey^H^H^H^H^H^H admin to define who the
local users are so that they don't
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:17:28AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
> > relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any
> > law.
>
> Maybe in Netherlands is not il
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:03:37AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip Jonathan's confidential message]
> I know exactly what your problem is, but I can't tell you, because I'm
> not sure that you addressed the question to me. Please re-send your
> message without any
I have 2 e450s (with very large hardware RAID5 arrays) that I want to
setup in a replicated/failover environment. These boxes will primarily
be a backend for smtp/pop3. Is there a clean way to do this without
investing $40k in Veritas's clustering/replication software? Can NFS
failover cleanly
Alright already.
I dont make the rules i just tend to obey them. Sometimes. :-)
As requested:
> Apologies in advance for this question, I have trawled the archives and
the
> various web pages but no joy.
> The problem is my qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an
> average of
Apologies Henning,
I am using tcpserver. Qmail is set up according to life with qmail. Its nice
to see civility is not dead thou!
-Original Message-
From: Henning Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2001 12:52
To:
Subject: Re: Slow smtp response
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12:
Newbieportal writes:
> Everyone knows that we can connect to smtp server directly using telnet or
> simple socket connection script.
>
> Can I do the same for qmqp server or qmtpd server.
Not using telnet. At least, not without counting every character you
type before you type it and adding
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Apologies in advance for this question, I have trawled the archives and the
> various web pages but no joy.
> The problem is my qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an
> average of 100 secs for a connection to be made. I am running qmail on a
> redh
I have problem with the errata setting (from remote-server?) of To:
field in Reply msg.
Physical name of my qmail server is "terri1.te.astro.it" but mail domain
is "astrte.te.astro.it" (record CNAME in dns)
Many users (but not all!!!) of my organization send our msgs like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (sett
Pavel Kankovsky writes:
> Perhaps I should have been more specific: when I said ``clogged'' I meant
> the queue had run out of disk space and no new messages could be injected.
> (To make things better, it was even impossible to inject bounces.)
Oh, well, a full disk always requires immediate
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12:13:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem is my qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an
> average of 100 secs for a connection to be made. I am running qmail on a
> redhat 7.0 box.
Oh no, once more THE qmail-FAQ. If you really traveeled the
How do I stop spamers from sending mail to my domain and then disappearing
before the msg can be returned to the sender, all the messages are to a
random and invalid mailbox at my domain. I thought qmail would ignore any
incoming mail that does have a valid Mailbox/Maildir. I have set qmail as
pe
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Sure. You may *wish* to do something about it, but it's not required.
> While those 10,000 spam messages are sitting in your queue (on
> average, 434 per directory; a reasonable size for a directory on ufs
> or e2fs), new emails will continue to be rec
Hello
All,
Apologies in advance
for this question, I have trawled the archives and the various web pages
but no joy.
The problem is my
qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an average of 100 secs for a
connection to be made. I am running qmail on a redhat 7.0
box.
I have e
Hi all,
I've created a mailing list about qmail for French speaking users.
See http://qmail.free.fr/ for the instructions.
Cheers,
Dj.
Hi,
I have multiple lines of this when I do a ps ax
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup foo.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3 Maildir
They seems to be there for a long time. I never seen that many of such
lines previously.
Is there anything wrong??
Also, I uses supervise to star
george <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I use qmail+mysql system in SunOS.I want to filter a special mail
> address or subject
> or content when qmail server receiver all mail.
Qmail-Scanner may be the right thing for you. Have a look at
http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/
Regards, Frank
arnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Love to explain, that is, when you provide more information...
> Are you talking about compiling Qmail or something else?
I assume he means program deliveries in .qmail files.
For this the answer is "man qmail-command"
Regards, Frank
Roger Arnold wrote:
Hello George,
Love to explain, that is, when you provide more information...
Are you talking about compiling Qmail or something else?
Regards
Roger
george wrote:
> where can found exit code explain ?
>
> Thank you.
qmail Digest 4 Jun 2001 10:00:01 - Issue 1385
Topics (messages 63405 through 63432):
Re: ORBS, and RFC-ignorant blacklists
63405 by: Piotr Kasztelowicz
63406 by: Peter van Dijk
63430 by: Piotr Kasztelowicz
Re: smtp on a specific IP
63407 by: Ross Davis
where can found exit code explain ?
Thank you.
Hi Everone.
Here's my next experiment and wondering if this is possible
Everyone knows that we can connect to smtp server directly using telnet or
simple socket connection script.
Can I do the same for qmqp server or qmtpd server.
If yes, is this better way to speed up the sending mail.
If n
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
> relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any
> law.
Maybe in Netherlands is not illegal, but in Netherlands even euthanasia
is legal by any law, in other countri
84 matches
Mail list logo