Thus said Niles on Mon, 14 May 2001 11:49:46 EDT:
Jim,
Try sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe you mean [EMAIL PROTECTED] My guess, however, is
that he isn't on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list...
Andy
--
[---[system uptime]]
Thus said Michael Geier on Mon, 14 May 2001 13:39:10 CDT:
'preciate that no one flamed...
Generally you won't get flamed for decent technical questions like
this, however you might get flamed for using Microsoft Outlook to post
your email. :-)
Andy
--
[---[system
Thus said Robin S. Socha on 14 May 2001 22:30:00 +0200:
Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see a Mail-Followup-To header in your
message. Are people supposed to guess whether or not you are on the
list or whether or not you want a cc header listing your address so
that your mail filter can
On Wed, 09 May 2001 09:40:22 PDT, Michael Boyiazis wrote:
It has 3 parts:
plain text
html for normals
html for aol
Shouldn't that be:
text/plain for normals
bloat/html for lusers
bloat/html for aol users
:-)
Andy
On Tue, 08 May 2001 18:42:20 EDT, Carl J. Danowski wrote:
Does anyone know why the 'assign' file in /etc/qmail/users would continually be
overwritten?
Hmm, who else has ``root'' access to your box? If none, which cronjob
did you write that overwrites it? If none, which web utility did
On Mon, 07 May 2001 14:36:54 EDT, Carl J. Danowski wrote:
Why is someone sending this message again? I was successfully helped.
Someone else finally noticed... If you check the archives, I brought
this up months ago and no one seemed to notice the duplicates.
mail.delanet.com has been
Thus said Joan Picanyol i Puig on Sat, 05 May 2001 22:04:49 +0200:
However, look at the From: header of this message :(
This is most likely a client problem. You need to configure your
client to use the correct address. BTW, you didn't show the contents
of the rest of the control files...
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:35:10 CDT, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
It isn't my list, but if it was I would add the IP addresses of any servers
that sent a virus warning to my list into my tcp rules block list.
Unfortunately that won't work. The email is sent to a list exploder
and never directly
On 24 Apr 2001 06:57:45 PDT, Russ Allbery wrote:
I know you all are so against it... but don't you think it's time to
re-consider installing a scanner on Mailing Lists?
No, I think it's time to kick everyone running one of those broken
scanners that mails the mailing list off of the
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:01:57 +0200, NDSoftware wrote:
PLEASE USE A ANTIVIRUS !!!
Please don't send lame messages like this to the list. If you have
already blocked the virus with your software then what are you worried
about?
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:15:08 -0300, Alan R. wrote:
You are sending email with virus. Please use some anti-virus program.
What makes it worse are dumb anti-virus scanners that bounce messages
back to the list... :-)
Andy
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:10:10 EDT, Jason Kawaja wrote:
folks on the list who are _still_ using a windows box should go to :
Maybe you should refer them to something like:
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Installation-HOWTO/index.html
or
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html
;-)
Andy
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:22:50 +0200, Willy De la Court wrote:
Is'nt it time to install a virus scanner on the list.
Why? I see no reason why the list should have a virus scanner.
Andy
Thus said ANTIGEN_ITMAILMAN2 on Tue, 24 Apr 2001 03:37:19 BST:
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with W32/Navidad-B
(Sophos,Norman) virus.
Please fix your lame borken anti-virus scanner!!!
Andy
--
[---[system uptime]]
Thus said Jason Haar on Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:06:02 +1200:
me to realise a rare error condition I hadn't expected. This virus scanner
didn't like scanning a 90Mb zip'ped AVI file (ahem) - whereas another vendor
scanner took 1.5minutes to scan it, this one took nearly two hours...
Tell them to
Thus said "D. J. Bernstein" on 15 Apr 2001 19:31:35 -:
See http://cr.yp.to/qmail/warfield.html.
Wow, I've never seen a more clueless sysadmin.[1] It's apparent that he
doesn't understand what the problem was and decided to make qmail the
scapegoat. What's sad is that there are people out
Thus said Adam McKenna on Sun, 01 Apr 2001 01:48:17 -0800:
http://www.sendmail.net,,,news,2001,apr,01,3,5,@00030315464031/sm10/
Come on now. You can do better than this.
I got a good laugh out of it anyway. :-)
Andy
--
[---[system
Thus said "Ross Davis - Data Anywhere" on Sun, 25 Mar 2001 21:53:02 PST:
when I run qmail-qread I get 108,000 lines of emails, most of which have
sent. When I run qmail-qstat is says that there typically about 250 emails
that in queue.
Is that normal to have that may lines returned from
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:32:36 PST, "Brad Dameron" wrote:
failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_554_too_many_hops,_mail_i
s_looping.
Anyone know what can cause this error? Is there a way to stop the loop?
It means there are too many received lines in a message. To stop the
Thus said Alberto Dainotti on Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:31:30 +0100:
Is there a pop server allowing to use the maildir format
for users who have "Maildir" and a standard Mailbox
file for the other users ?
qmail-pop3d comes with qmail, but it only supports maildir, why would
you want both?
The
Thus said David Dyer-Bennet on 12 Mar 2001 00:21:10 CST:
Because my local users are used to using mailbox-based tools, but I'm
using vmailmgr for virtual support and it likes maildir. And some of
my local users want to also check via pop from time to time.
How do you intend to keep the
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 09 Mar 2001 13:55:22 +0800:
I've got 800+ error 554 form hotmail out of 1000+ email sent to valid hotmail.com
accounts.
Can anyone explain what's the problem - Hotmail or qmail or network problem?
Why don't you post a copy of one of the errors?
Andy
--
On Wed, 07 Mar 2001 17:19:39 PST, "info" wrote:
is there a way to notify me that i've received an e-mail for the account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] into my other account [EMAIL PROTECTED] , without forwarding a copy of the
e-mail?
Something like:
| sed -n -f $HOME/headers.sed | qmail-inject
On Wed, 07 Mar 2001 17:19:39 PST, "info" wrote:
is there a way to notify me that i've received an e-mail for the account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] into my other account [EMAIL PROTECTED] , without forwarding a copy of the
e-mail?
Oops, forgot one thing... Don't forget to put the normal delivery
On Thu, 01 Mar 2001 17:08:43 EST, wrote:
This is very annoying! I've spent lots of time training the users to
configure their clients properly, and now my qmail server sends out
garbage, which defeats the purpose. :(
What did you train your users to do? They should be putting in a
Thus said "Chrisanthy Carlane" on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:13:52 +0700:
What I want to ask is: HOW to create that buffering thing ? Do I have to add
every user for every domain(which will be a lot of user)?
With a standard qmail install it's as simple as:
Add their domain to
ROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mailserver buffering
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 23:17:22 -0700
From: Andy Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the duplicate:
Received: (qmail 15724 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2001 17:53:13
Thus said "D. J. Bernstein" on 01 Mar 2001 02:27:37 GMT:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/2237
``Currently the SecurityFocus staff are not aware of any vendor
supplied patches for this issue.''
Why haven't they updated this? On a properly configured qmail system
this is a
Thus said "Phil Oester" on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:02:15 PST:
Any issues with NFS mounting the alias directory so a common version can be
shared by all mail servers?
You should probably use the ``fastforward'' package and then distribute
the alias.cdb with rsync or something like that. I
Thus said "Chrisanthy Carlane" on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:44:14 +0700:
They must produce an appropriate MX record in their DNS information
which points to your mail server.
OK, and when their emails go to my server, where do they go(what directory,
do I have to make a directory for their
Thus said Chris Hellberg on Wed, 01 Jan 1997 04:57:21 +1300:
Oops, you're right, doesn't seem to work. The file should be named just
.qmail in the user's directory. I've tried it with .qmail file and works
for me so give that a shot.
Just so you understand why this works and not
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:57:59 PST, wrote:
have I obviously missed?? I've used the LWQ and set up the qmail server
using Ch 11 of Running with qmail - Using qmail as an ISP server. Am I
supposed to resupply the To: / From: fields using variables in the
.qmail-default file?? Any help would be
Thus said Paul Farber on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:28:56 EST:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -q -ladmin.f-tech.net -xtcp.cdb -- 0 25
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
I think you need a 21 at the end of that line (and that line should
be all on one line).
Also, the multilog part of the qmail-smtpd dosen't
Thus said TAG on Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:36:05 +0200:
ok - Yes - how
Put a single ``#'' in your dotqmail file for postmaster.
and NO - why not ??
What if for some strange reason someone starts spamming from your mail
server. I would like to be able to send an email to postmaster to
inform
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:39:22 GMT, "Grant Edwards" wrote:
It's sort of an odd request, but I'd like to route outgoing mail to one of
two SMTP servers, but I don't want to do it based on the destination
address. I would like to do it based on the From: address in the header.
You could
Thus said Mario Thaten on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 01:44:25 +0100:
From the docs of svscan I learned, that
"svscan starts a pair of supervise processes, one for sub, one for
sub/log, with a pipe between them.", but this effect does not take
place, and I really don't know, what the problem might
Thus said "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" on Wed, 07 Feb 2001 15:11:28 EST:
What is the proper format for the tcp.smtp file in regards to multiple class
c networks. For example
209.168.128-143.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
This seems to be consistent with
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcprules.html in the
Thus said "dennis" on Mon, 05 Feb 2001 13:23:55 +1100:
I must be as thick as two short planks but for the file of me I can't get my
head around how SVSCAN works. Can someone please enlighten me, PLEASE !!
svscan ``scans'' the directory that you give it for other directories.
For each
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:56:26 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
sendmail[23266]: OAA23264: to=toto@the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine,
ctladdr=the_sender_on_the_machine (50011/50012), delay=00:00:00,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp,
relay=the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine.
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:32:13 +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
That is not sufficient.
That was my point. Not having seen a security audit, nor looked at the
code myself, there is not solid claim to security.
That said, I use the imapd myself.
We use it here as well on production systems.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:48:21 +0200, "Alex Kramarov" wrote:
I do not use a broken MUA. I use an MUA that helps me construct
a more personal e-mail by adding backgrounds and other multimedia
elements. If you want to check that out, there is a link to it's site
on the bottom of my e-mail.
Thus said Rahsheen Porter on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:27:14 EST:
I'm extremely happy with qmail and the other software available from
DJB, but I've yet to hear anything about an IMAP server that takes
security into consideration. I'm running Courier-IMAP right now, but I
haven't actually opened
Thus said Linux on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:24:39 +0100:
There is a method to run qmail on a specific IP address.
For example binding on 111.222.222.222:25 instead of 0.0.0.0:25
This is the job of tcpserver... find your invocation of tcpserver and
change the 0 to 111.222.222.222.
Andy
--
Thus said Peter Green on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:28:12 EST:
Also, if you ever have any doubt, create a temporary .qmail file for a user
that reads:
env/tmp/qmail.env
Don't forget the pipe... :-)
| env /tmp/qmail.env
Andy
--
[---[system
Hey all,
I have a really annoying spammer on my hands and just wonder if it is
possible to use wildcards in badmailfrom? Originally I added
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to badmailfrom and that blocked it for about a month. Then he got
halfway smart and changed his sender address to
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:40:12 CST, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Someone posted a patch to do this some time ago. You could search the
qmail list archives for it, or look at qmail.org for a pointer. I think
it was called 'badrcptpatterns' or something similar.
Yes, thanks to another poster I found
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:02:44 EST, "Hubbard, David" wrote:
Is everyone else receiving a bunch of emails
from 'funky gao'? Can someone remove this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from the list? I've
received quite a few messages from him this
morning, all containing the file Emanuel.exe
with a virus.
Thus said "Robin S. Socha" on 16 Jan 2001 20:47:55 +0100:
A module is not a patch. You can apply as many well written modules as
you like - but you cannot simply patch away at an existing code base.
Unless you write code in Lisp... :-)
Andy
--
[---[system
Thus said "Kurth Bemis" on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:11:57 EST:
Jan 12 06:54:30 noname pop3d: 979300470.784986 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure
out port number for pop-3
Jan 12 06:54:31 noname qmail: 979300471.799484 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
My guess would be that you specified pop-3 in
Thus said Andy Bradford on Sat, 13 Jan 2001 22:19:11 MST:
My guess would be that you specified pop-3 in your start script,
however, pop-3 does not exist in /etc/protocols
Oops, make that /etc/services (I hate replying to my own replies) :-)
Andy
--
[---[system uptime
Thus said "Keith Smith" on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 18:56:09 MST:
I received an error ""Shadow-Utils is needed by qmail-1.03-6
Sounds like you need to install the shadow-utils RPM...
Andy
--
[---[system uptime]]
10:41pm up 70 days, 1:02, 6
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 18:50:29 EST, wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
x.x.x.x does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address
rejected: Relay access denied
Giving up on x.x.x.x.
Hmm, this is not a qmail error message. In fact, if I do the following
it looks
Thus said Ricardo Cerqueira on Sun, 07 Jan 2001 01:50:16 GMT:
Hmmm... OK, disregard my previous mail.
Personally, I'd rather have one file for SMTP, and another for QMTP. Does
anyone else here agree with me?
This seems more logical to me as it allows finer control over the
entire system.
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001 13:38:56 EST, Bernard Karmilowicz wrote:
I am trying to send mail from host FROM_HOST (1.2.3.4) to host TO_HOST
(1.2.3.5). The mail is addressed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". qmail is running on
both hosts. Unfortunately, TO_HOST refuses the mail. However, TO_HOST
will accept
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:17:40 +0200, Seby wrote:
How can i configure qmail to allow a users to send emails only to
the localhost.. and to can not send emails romote (to another host)
echo 0 /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote
Might do the trick---but I believe that would just hold
On Tue, 05 Dec 2000 02:18:33 +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
By the way, about the discussion about the net worth of virus scanners,
please have a look a the email I just got (no, I am not making this up):
I can verify this---I too received a similar bounce from their group
and sent them
Thus said "montgomery f. tidwell" on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:59:32 PST:
sorry for all the tests. this is the only mail list that
will accept my Sender: messed up emails.
That's because qmail doesn't care about the Sender header...
Andy
--
[---[system
Thus said Andrew Buenaventura on Fri, 01 Dec 2000 11:56:36 +0800:
I am going to setup a dedicated linux box that will run qmail only. What is
the most minimum package that I need to install from Red Hat 7.0 to be able
to run Qmail? I do not want unnecessary services/daemons running on that
Thus said "asantos" on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:13:18 -0100:
For someone with such a doubtfull sense of humour as he shows to have
welcoming IE users the way he does at http://socha.net/, he seems to be
inordinately proud of listing among his "computer skills" Microsoft Office.
Bah! That's a lot
Thus said Jamin Collins on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:45:04 CST:
* 6 attribution lines
Don't believe this is a requirement or violation of any RFC. If it is,
which one?
* No citation leader
Once again. Don't believe this is a requirement or violation of any RFC. If
it is, which one?
Thus said Arif Rudiana on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:14:42 +0700:
to find in archive files... I think it's better to post my questions to
this millist
Please turn of HTML in your emails. ;-)
in recipient the sender username appears like this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] what
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:06:03 EST, Dave Sill wrote:
I recommend copying and pasting the scripts, rather than typing them
in by hand. Unless you're in Florida, in which case, entering manually
is more accurate.
ROTFLOL!!! This has got to be one of the best Florida jokes I have
seen. :-)
Thus said Chris Olson on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:28:26 CST:
I believe I'm no more braindead than you are. At least I have the
common courtesy to not post a derogatory statement like this on the
list, nor would I even send a private email to anyone containing a
Granted, it is pretty rude to send
Thus said Romeyn Prescott on Sat, 25 Nov 2000 11:52:05 EST:
There may be others. I have no idea if this will work.
It may work for a few cases, but with today's mailiers, it most likely
will corrupt the message or not be seen at all. Consider the different
Content-Type made available in
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:21:10 EST, Warren Small wrote:
I'm sure a lot of you will say that the problem is obviously a DNS lookup
issue but I can lookup this server name successfully from the same server
that is having problems talking to the qmail server. This problem is also
not confined to
Thus said Jose AP Celestino on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 01:38:39 GMT:
Have you tried rtfm. There's plenty of stuff on this.
Why don't you RTFM on your MUA so you don't send out duplicate emails
to the mailing list... sheesh.
Andy
--
[---[system
Thus said David Ryan on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 16:13:43 +1100:
The main difference is that I do not want them to be able to
reply-to-all. I had used a mailing list but someone did a reply-to-all
and caused all sorts of trouble.
Use ezmlm to setup a mailing list and then make the list moderated so
Thus said "David L. Nicol" on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:12:46 CST:
What about the "notification on delivery" stuff -- is that not
an MTA feature? Is it deprecated? Rather it would be a feature
of the MDA, has anyone added it to qmail-local?
You mean something like what is covered in "man
Thus said Raul Miller on Sun, 19 Nov 2000 12:33:30 EST:
Or do you have similar problems deciding whether ATM means automated
teller machine or asychronous transfer mode? Or deciding whether
ASP means active server pages or application service provider? Or ...
Not generally, however, I must
Thus said "Michael T. Babcock" on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:41:20 EST:
OSI == "Open Source Initiative" I believe ...
That's funny, I always thought that OSI was the _Open Systems
Interconnection_ internet model proposed by the ISO. I guess this
goes to show that context really does matter. :-)
Thus said "Casey Allen Shobe" on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 03:30:55 EST:
Hi there, I run a webmail service, and am having some trouble. It appears
that not all web browsers send CRLF, but instead send LF only when I
compose (this is the fault of the widget used for entering email).
It has nothing
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:54:48 CST:
So you're basically saying that qmail can pretty much mung up an
e-mail address any way it likes because it's...qmail!
No, he is not saying that at all. qmail out-of-the-box will not munge
anything. What that user was asking
Thus said defender of the protocol on Fri, 10 Nov 2000 21:24:59 EST:
someone correct me if im wrong, but when i add a user (to users/assign, i
have all virtualdomains), i run qmail-newu and SIGHUP qmail-send, so yeah
There is no need to HUP qmail-send unless virtualdomains or locals has
Thus said Kimberly Vher on Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:35:34:
so that i have a copy in my hotmail account. but i want to make a copy to
multiple address how can i do that?
Just put in multiple addresses in the .qmail file---they should each be
separated by a newline. That's all folks.
Andy
--
On Wed, 08 Nov 2000 14:24:11 GMT, "Michael Vorburger" wrote:
I need to implement a New Mail Notification; not for login like qbiff etc,
but more like notifiying users on another external email, SMS etc in the
future. So a simple forward won't do, I need to call some external script
each
Thus said Jens Georg on Sat, 04 Nov 2000 19:49:57 +0100:
echo 10485760 /var/qmail/control/databytes
is this really enough ? i remember to read once that qmail has to be
compiled specially to use this feature.
Yes, this really is all that needs to be done---no special compiling or
Thus said Brett Randall on 03 Nov 2000 13:44:59 +1100:
In-Reply-To (note caps)...I will make it case insensitive for future
cases. Apologies to Phil and anyone else who has received this
error...
I believe all headers should be treated case insensitive... :-) Kind
of nice that it's working
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:28:09 +0100, Enrique wrote:
Qmail doesn't support "return receipt". Any solution for this?.
Return receipt is not at all a function of the underlying MTA. All you
really need is to include a Disposition-Notification-To header in every
outgoing mail with the address
Thus said "Anthony Abby" on Sat, 28 Oct 2000 22:29:41 EDT:
Can someone point me to documentation or just tell me how I can filter out
ALL attachements to my smtp server. I'm using Qmail solely in a listserver
environment and I want to make sure that zero attachements get through. I'm
new
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:00:11 MST:
and have your *real* address that you give out to people who you want to
have a stable address be user-something@domain and be careful about
revealing that something. :)
That's a good idea Russ.
It is a very good idea,
Thus said Brett Randall on 28 Oct 2000 22:28:51 +1100:
A better alternative, IMHO, is to use a certain anti-spam e-mail
address (someone on this list uses it but I can't remember who) that
only lasts like a week, and then its gone. This gives most ppl enuf
time to reply. This won't cut down
Thus said "Anthony Abby" on Sun, 29 Oct 2000 15:38:38 EST:
Andy, I appreciate the advice, but I like LISTAR much better. The feature
set looks to be fuller to me than does EZMLM. All I want to do is strip out
attachements at the SMTP level. Is that possible?
No, it is not possible to
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:50:46 +0200, "Wilson, Frank" wrote:
This means of course, that when mail.web-trade.com is down, the mail will be
stored localy in the postmaster account on be.wise.no.
You must have configured it do deliver email locally then. If you
simply accept the mail and not
Thus said Daniel Augusto Fernandes on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:07:49 -0200:
You should look at the mail header of this message and see what's your
address.
The very first (mostly) is something like this:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately, the return-path may not always be
Thus said Adam McKenna on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:51:03 EDT:
That's why ezmlm creates a random tag for each subscription that is sent back
to the subscriber for confirmation. There is no way to subscribe someone
else to an ezmlm list unless you have access to their mail spool.
Then, what is to
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 23:26:33 GMT:
I have noticed that it is possible to send infected messages
with sqwebmail running qmail-scanner.
I guess sqwebmail put messages directly in the queue, so it
no qmail-smptd is called and no antivirus is used.
I don't see how you
Thus said "Hubbard, David" on Thu, 26 Oct 2000 23:31:01 EDT:
verify that since I don't have a mailer to try it with
but it seems that you'd never want the 451 in this case
because obviously it will be the same mailer that will
retry each time and it will continue to be broken for each
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000 20:12:14 +0200, "Mark Weinem" wrote:
Are there any search tools (like grepmail) for Maildirs?
Well, you could use a combination of grep and find maybe... or even
iterate over the files found by find and grep on those, whatever... I
can think of a number of different
Thus said "Yamin Prabudy" on Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:31:42 +0700:
My friend forwad it to me from http://www.orbs.org/otherresource.html
The URL is actually:
http://www.orbs.org/otherresources.html
I suggest you read it and then take your pick which you want to use...
When qmail is configured
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:57:22 BST, "ROD" wrote:
I have read qmail-send but still i'm still a bit unclear to how to doit.
Would
info.@thenewdawn:ezmlm-test
send anything with info.*@thenewdawn to the ezmlm-test?
e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:57:22 BST, "ROD" wrote:
Would
info.@thenewdawn:ezmlm-test
send anything with info.*@thenewdawn to the ezmlm-test?
e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry about that last blank email... I accidentally hit ctrl-s instead
of ctrl-d. :-)
Anyway, no you cannot use wildcard
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:35:07 MDT, Andy Bradford wrote:
thenewdawn.com:thenewdawn
I think I made a mistake... I believe it should be:
thenewdawn.com:alias-thenewdawn
Andy
Thus said "Aaron Newcomb" on Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:26:30 EDT:
Yes. That makes sense. I knew there had to be a way. Thanks for the help.
The most offending address is 210.133.28.162.
Ok Aaron,
This host is definitely a spammers delight---it's known as an Open
Relay. This means that it will
Thus said "Aaron Newcomb" on Fri, 13 Oct 2000 23:19:48 EDT:
Notice that the HELO and the MAIL FROM: lines have completely different
domains. The MAIL FROM they are using is a bogus address. What is the best
way to prevent email like this from being accepted?
Without some hacking you won't be
Thus said "Todd McGuinness" on Sat, 14 Oct 2000 15:27:06 PDT:
authetication config... The error I receive in the browser window is:
server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration. I have a
couple users on this site and I don't really want to set up virtual
domains, but I do want
Thus said szq79 on Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:03:45:
I have linux and qmail installed. You know, as a webmaster, sometime send a letter
to everyone is needed for a webmaster.I don't know how to do this.Please tell me.
There are a number of ways to approach this of which here are two:
1. put all
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:04:14 PDT, Mike Glover wrote:
Okay, so does anybody know of a "real" MUA that is X-enhanced?
Sorry, but "pretty" is more of a concern to me than "works
properly in strange situations". I would prefer "not outright
broken" and "not vaporware", though.
I personally
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:12:42 EDT, Chris Johnson wrote:
If I were troubleshooting a communication problem between two hosts, and on one
end of the connection was some piece of Microsoft software, and on the other
end of the connection was some software written by Dan Bernstein, can you guess
Thus said "James Stevens" on Wed, 11 Oct 2000 08:04:13 PDT:
Nod, I agree.. However the people I work with and especially my boss are all
in love with Majordomo and I even bring up the subject of moving to another
list server and I get stared at So I'm stuck with Majordomo and qmail.
Hmm,
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:37:37 -0300, Pupeno wrote:
and of course the mails stays on the queue without being delivered.
The directory /home/pupeno/Maildir exists:
drwxr-xr-x 2 pupeno pupeno 512 Oct 9 21:19 Maildir/
How did you create the Maildir? Did you use maildirmake? If not, you
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
