I think I have qmail up and running after following the instructions in lwq.
I am now trying the tests in TEST.deliver.
However I get an error at the first test, local-local delivery/
status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
starting delivery 1: msg 508836 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: local 1/10
* Jean-Christian Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010813 08:25]:
I think I have qmail up and running after following the instructions in lwq.
I am now trying the tests in TEST.deliver.
However I get an error at the first test, local-local delivery/
Is this an error in my installationof qmail? Did
From: Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. Have you read
INSTALL.mbox
INSTALL.vsm
and INSTALL.maildir?
Just read those three documents and none of them say that I *have* to do
anything. Seems mostly like recommendation on what to do if you want to keep
using /var/spool/mail or to configure
* Jean-Christian Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010813 09:15]:
Just read those three documents and none of them say that I *have* to do
anything. Seems mostly like recommendation on what to do if you want to keep
using /var/spool/mail or to configure MUA's to use Maildir.
Also this machien is
. This
is my first mail server, and this is really cool stuff!
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Bakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Qmail List
Subject: Local Delivery failure
I keep receiving the following error message in my log file when I send a
test
David Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the proper way to configure qmail so it does not attempt local
delivery, even when a specific host is given in the email address?
Leave control/locals empty.
For example, if mail is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want it to
actually be delivered
What is the proper way to configure qmail so it does not attempt local
delivery, even when a specific host is given in the email address?
For example, if mail is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want it to
actually be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). I thought the proper way
Hi ALL,
I'm tring deliver messages localy thru qmail (smtp)
and I have no DNS services configured at this time. It's not working and I read
somewhere that qmail need DNS. My question is, even if for local domains
?
Can you please send me indications with more detail
about how create the
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 01:38:07AM +, Mark Delany wrote:
The output of qmail-showctl will tell you (and us) a lot more.
that's what I like about qmail, so many programs to do just what you
need! Just need to learn them now.
I guess is that you have worldsite.ws in /var/qmail/control/me and
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 10:27:14AM -0800, George Georgalis wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 01:38:07AM +, Mark Delany wrote:
The output of qmail-showctl will tell you (and us) a lot more.
that's what I like about qmail, so many programs to do just what you
need! Just need to learn them
Hi,
I'm installing qmail on LAN box and have not yet disabled sendmail.
When I run either of these commands
echo to: nonexistent | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
echo to: georgeg | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
mail goes through an external smtp. Why? I don't recall specifying the
IP (or it's
The output of qmail-showctl will tell you (and us) a lot more.
I guess is that you have worldsite.ws in /var/qmail/control/me and
something other than this domain in /var/qmail/control/locals
Western Somoa huh? I had a lot of fun trying to register a domain
there, oh, 8 years ago.
Regards.
root@[SCREEN3.moj /root/Maildir/new] # echo to: root | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject -n
1
root@[SCREEN3.moj /root/Maildir/new] # t 0 110
Trying 0.0.0.0...
Connected to 0.
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
user root
+OK
pass x
+OK
stat
+OK 1 169
retr 1
+OK
Return-Path: [EMAIL
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:32:31PM +0100, Tomas TPS Ulej wrote:
root@[SCREEN3.moj /root/Maildir/new] # echo to: root | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
-n 1
root@[SCREEN3.moj /root/Maildir/new] # cat ~alias/.qmail-root
/root/Maildir/
qmail never delivers as or to root. You should never read
Hi there,
i'm getting this msg at my mail log:
delivery 13: deferral:
message_transmission_failed_(451_See_http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.)/
i have already read it (http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html).
i'm using, fetchmail to retrieve my mail.
could any one help me please.
Jorge Bras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
delivery 13: deferral:
message_transmission_failed_(451_See_http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.)/
i have already read it (http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html).
Which part didn't you understand? You're injecting mail with bare linefeeds.
That's
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Which part didn't you understand? You're injecting mail with bare
linefeeds.
That's a no-no. Don't do it.
i'm using, fetchmail to retrieve my mail.
Then fetchmail is broken. Use something else.
I wouldn't say fetchmail is broken. The bare LFs weren't inserted by
Hi,
I have a domain integrationsoft.com, when I get mail on one account
(user1), and login, and attempt to forward the mail to another account
(user2), on the same domain/server qmail complaints:
from /var/log/messages:
Nov 15 15:38:38 m3 sendmail[50960]: eAFNccL50958: SYSERR(phate): MX
list
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 11:12:23AM -0800, Oliver Menzel wrote:
I have a domain integrationsoft.com, when I get mail on one account
(user1), and login, and attempt to forward the mail to another account
(user2), on the same domain/server qmail complaints:
from /var/log/messages:
Nov 15
Thanks!
I just thought my sendmail was a link to the corresponding qmail
program, but I skipped that step during installation
Regards,
Oliver
--- Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 11:12:23AM -0800, Oliver Menzel wrote:
I have a domain integrationsoft.com, when
Hello,
We have just completed migrating a sendmail installation for roughly 15000
users to qmail. After doing so, we are experiencing longish delays on the
delivery of incoming messages.
We currently have qmail-smtpd starting from tcpserver using:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
Try disabling host resolution in tcpserver (by adding the -H option).
That's what usually stalls smtp deliveries with tcpserver.
RC
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:39:11PM -0500, Jamin A. Brown wrote:
Hello,
We have just completed migrating a sendmail installation for roughly 15000
users to
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:39:11PM -0500, Jamin A. Brown wrote:
Hello,
We have just completed migrating a sendmail installation for roughly 15000
users to qmail. After doing so, we are experiencing longish delays on the
delivery of incoming messages.
What sort of passwd technology are you
The delay seems to occur from when mx0 accepts the message to when mx0
writes it to the user's Maildir. My guess would be that the
queue is not being processed fast enough.
Have you checked the trigger?
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html#trigger
Sounds like a classic
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:39:11PM -0500, Jamin A. Brown wrote:
Hello,
We have just completed migrating a sendmail installation for roughly 15000
users to qmail. After doing so, we are experiencing longish delays on the
delivery of
Hi ppl,
I have a secondary MX for a domain "dex.co.za"
pointing to my qmail box. The primary MX points to
an Exchange server, the Exchange server is
on our local LAN.
I created a virtual domain for "dex.co.za" on the qmail box.
Is it possible that I can forward the email received for
I created a virtual domain for "dex.co.za" on the qmail box.
Don't do that. dex.co.za has to go only into /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts.
Is it possible that I can forward the email received for
"dex.co.za" locally over the LAN??
Yes, you may use the MX from DNS or better (for DNS outages)
Hello there,
Hi,
I would like our mail to be firstly delivered
to my organisation's DMZ (through a regular
primary MX record), and then to make it
route to our internal network (private
IP addresses).
I think a "smtproute" that overrides the
DNS configuration might do it, but I'm
Hello there,
I would like our mail to be firstly delivered
to my organisation's DMZ (through a regular
primary MX record), and then to make it
route to our internal network (private
IP addresses).
I think a "smtproute" that overrides the
DNS configuration might do it, but I'm
not sure.
Is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like our mail to be firstly delivered
to my organisation's DMZ (through a regular
primary MX record), and then to make it
route to our internal network (private
IP addresses).
I think a "smtproute" that overrides the
DNS
hi,
I think a "smtproute" that overrides the
DNS configuration might do it, but I'm
not sure.
Is this the proper way of doing it?
yes, it is...
in fact, many companies hide their (e.g. m$ exchange) server that way.
;) a
==
Alexander Jernejcic
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:19:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello there,
I would like our mail to be firstly delivered
to my organisation's DMZ (through a regular
primary MX record), and then to make it
route to our internal network (private
IP addresses).
I think a
Hi,
Could someone please tell me how to configure qmail to use maildrop as the
default LDA? (I uninstalled procmail instead of trying to get it to work with
qmail.)
Thanks,
Ben Logan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
When qmail tries to delivery to some of the users, it get the error:
"uh-oh: qmail_has_file_delivery_but_has_x_bit_set".
I use Maildir's.
What is wrong, and what do I have to do?
I think there is some dotfiles with x bit set. Try some like this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24 Aug 2000, at 17:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"uh-oh: qmail_has_file_delivery_but_has_x_bit_set".
What is wrong, and what do I have to do?
You should read man dot-qmail. It says:
If .qmail has the execute bit set, it must not
Where has this message gone?
Jun 23 18:39:05 einstein qmail: 961778345.318647 new msg 16012
Jun 23 18:39:05 einstein qmail: 961778345.318807 info msg 16012: bytes 294
from qp 30890 uid 71 Jun 23 18:39:05 einstein qmail: 961778345.326744
starting delivery 27207: msg 16012 to local
Hi!
Where has this message gone?
Jun 23 18:39:05 einstein qmail: 961778345.318647 new msg 16012
Jun 23 18:39:05 einstein qmail: 961778345.318807 info msg 16012: bytes 294 from qp
30890 uid 71
Jun 23 18:39:05 einstein qmail: 961778345.326744 starting delivery 27207: msg 16012 to
local
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 06:53:06PM +0200, Robert Sander wrote:
Hi!
Where has this message gone?
Have you checked /var/qmail/alias/Mailbox or /var/qmail/alias/Maildir/ ?
If memory serves that's where messages end up with which qmail doesn't know
what to do...
The other alternative is the
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 06:55:59PM +0200, Steffan Hoeke wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 06:53:06PM +0200, Robert Sander wrote:
Hi!
Where has this message gone?
Have you checked /var/qmail/alias/Mailbox or /var/qmail/alias/Maildir/ ?
If memory serves that's where messages end up with
Hello all,
Is there a way to insert a shim (or shell wrapper) before qmail-local
deleivers a local message?
IE, check for message size if $RECIEPENT = 'baduser' or some such thing?
It would seem administratively easier to apply these type of filters for a
large group of users that way rather
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to insert a shim (or shell wrapper) before qmail-local
delivers a local message?
Simple; write a wrapper called ``qmail-local'', which in the end
exec's the original qmail-local (which you should rename, of
course). The interface is
Mikhail Kuzminsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Is it possible (and how) to setup Qmail and fastforward
for work with /bin/mail as a local delivery agent
*and* to deliver all the mail messages (sent to particular user
- to blah, for example) - to the pipe like
|usr/people/blah
I find it amazing what corp enviroments ask IT to do instead of confronting
a user on specific issues, but I was told to look into it.
I have a particular user who is abusing the mail system with improper
mailings to friends. We use email internally for everyone as a wonderful
means of contact
as a local delivery agent
*and* to deliver all the mail messages (sent to particular user
- to blah, for example) - to the pipe like
|usr/people/blah/program /usr/people/blah/blahfile ?
2) Is it possible (and how) to setup qmail-local
(as local delivery agent) to deliver
Message-
From: Tim Hunter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:local delivery for 1 user only
I find it amazing what corp enviroments ask IT to do instead of confronting
a user on specific issues, but I was told to look
What you're asking is not very difficult -- especially if you use tcpservers.
First however, it's important to note what your current network looks like.
In the case of a local network that's firewalled to the internet, you can simply use
RELAYCLIENT= and a shellscript .
simply change your
Rumor has it that Gregory J. Forkin may have mentioned these words:
Tim--
I have a suggestion for you. But first, I think that you should look at the
real implications of the request, that is if this starts for one employee
you can be sure there will be others.
I agree with Gregory on being
Dear netters,
I'm newbie in Qmail world. I've installed Qmail 1.03 fastforward
0.51 under SGI O2/IRIX 6.3.
But I didn't find in docs an answers to few questions about
local mail delivery.
1) Is it possible (and how) to setup Qmail and fastforward
with /bin/mail as a local delivery agent
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 08:41:26AM -0600, Fred Lindberg wrote:
ezmlm-idx-0.40 has built-in support for QMQP. It sends posts via
qmail-qmqpc and administrative mail via qmail-queue. No need for extra
installations.
Hmm...I kinda hate to disturb my current ezmlm installation on this system (I
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:18:12 -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
Also, I don't see where in my ezmlm installation I can tell it to use another
qmail installation. Do I have to recompile ezmlm? If so, then I may as well
just bite the bullet one weekend soon and do the upgrade.
You can take your existing
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 04:18:41PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
I cruised the archives for this problem and the consensus seemed to be that
there was no solution. My mailing lists are swamping the upstream on my DSL
connection. I have a machine at work that I want to offload the queueing onto
I cruised the archives for this problem and the consensus seemed to be that
there was no solution. My mailing lists are swamping the upstream on my DSL
connection. I have a machine at work that I want to offload the queueing onto
via QMQP. As I understand it my qmail-qmqpc uploads a copy of the
il hosting that is easy to maintain and debug, it's
always best to have local delivery of mail to the mailhost. I.e. if your
mailhost is called gandalf.foobar.net, then that very host accepts mail for
that local domain. When splitting domain delivery, it's always easiest to
take advantage of that loca
Greetings -
I'm trying to configure QMail to accept and locally deliver mail (using
/bin/mail on a Solaris 2.6 machine) for only one specific e-mail address,
and forward ALL other e-mail messages to the Corporate mail hub.
I'm sure there is probably an easy way to do this, but I cannot seem to
Hi,
I've just upgraded qmail from 0.94 to 1.03 and now there's no local
delivery of email!
When I sent email from anywhere on the internet to our mailhost it
immediately delivers.
When I sent email from inside our LAN to an account on the mailhost the
message is put in the queue and as far
PROTECTED]'
Onderwerp: No local delivery??? HELP!
Hi,
I've just upgraded qmail from 0.94 to 1.03 and now there's no local
delivery of email!
When I sent email from anywhere on the internet to our mailhost it
immediately delivers.
When I sent email from inside our LAN to an account
i have a popuser of a virtual domain which want to deliver his mail in a
local popbox and also deliver this message to his private email-address.
on another qmail server wihout virtual domains i put the following in
his .qmail file in his home directory:
./Maildir/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried
This seems like a question that should be easily answered, yet the answer
I came up with on my own seems almost *too* easy, so I thought I'd ask.
:-)
I'm going to be doing some minor maintenance on the mail server and
changing users from mbox to Maildir format. I'd like to stop all local
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 02:54:30PM -0600, Adam Michaud wrote:
This seems like a question that should be easily answered, yet the answer
I came up with on my own seems almost *too* easy, so I thought I'd ask.
:-)
I'm going to be doing some minor maintenance on the mail server and
changing
There is something called virtualdomains to do this. See the FAQ and
search the archives. It's very easy.
- eric
Joao Paulo Pagaime escribió:
Hello all
Sorry if this is a repetition but I suppose I goofed up
sending the message yesterday...
I would like to have qmail setup to receive
On Mon, 31 May 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote:
There is something called virtualdomains to do this. See the FAQ and
search the archives. It's very easy.
Yes, but I didn't want to have a .qmail-user forwarding
to the actual user/machine. That looks like making 2 deliveries,
and it's a pain to
Hello all
I would like to have qmail setup to receive mail
for 2 different domains. But would like the addresses
from those domains to be routed for different users on
the machine. Example:
name@domain1 -- user 'abc'
name@domain2 -- user 'def'
So I went to the users/assign and
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Niels Jensen wrote:
So, some of my control files are:
me:f64.work.com
locals:f64.work.com (to define local addresses)
defaultdomain: work.com
defaulthost: sonic.net (my ISP)
plusdomain:work.com
smtproutes:
Niels Jensen writes:
If I do this, then when I mail stuff remotely through my ISP's
mailserver, the return address for me is my work address, which I
do not want. Somehow I have to make qmail change my address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] whenever mail is sent rmotely, and keep
Mate Wierdl writes:
Niels Jensen writes:
If I do this, then when I mail stuff remotely through my ISP's
mailserver, the return address for me is my work address, which I
do not want. Somehow I have to make qmail change my address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] whenever
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Niels Jensen wrote:
So, some of my control files are:
me:f64.work.com
locals:f64.work.com (to define local addresses)
defaultdomain: work.com
defaulthost: sonic.net (my ISP)
plusdomain:work.com
smtproutes::mail.sonic.net
If I send
Niels Jensen writes:
If I do this, then when I mail stuff remotely through my ISP's
mailserver, the return address for me is my work address, which I
do not want. Somehow I have to make qmail change my address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] whenever mail is sent rmotely, and keep it to
nielsj, or
Niels Jensen writes:
If I do this, then when I mail stuff remotely through my ISP's
mailserver, the return address for me is my work address, which I
do not want. Somehow I have to make qmail change my address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] whenever mail is sent rmotely, and keep it to
nielsj,
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Niels Jensen wrote:
So, some of my control files are:
me:f64.work.com
locals:f64.work.com (to define local addresses)
defaultdomain: work.com
defaulthost: sonic.net (my ISP)
plusdomain:work.com
smtproutes::mail.sonic.net
If I send
put my full host and domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) instead of just
my username, the local delivery works fine.
I have read through the provided docs, and cannot figure it out.
The mailing list archives discuss the recipientmap control file, which is
apparently gone.
Any ideas?
Niels Jensen
70 matches
Mail list logo
