andi wrote:
>
> i try to make pine works with maildir..
> and i use freebsd4.1.1 release , pine4.31
> and pine-4.31-maildir.patch .
> i get the error below when my machine compile the command
> ./build bsf
>
> cc: ../c-client/c-client.a: No such file or directory
>
i try to make pine works with maildir..
and i use freebsd4.1.1 release , pine4.31
and pine-4.31-maildir.patch .
i get the error below when my machine compile the command
./build bsf
cc: ../c-client/c-client.a: No such file or directory
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/local/pine4.31/pine.
Links
tc lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i never cared for mutt either, although i never spent a huge amount of
> time trying to figure it out. my main issue with it is that i could never
> get it to sort my inbox properly (just normal sorting - by arrival time -
> how the files in the maildir are
Great notes on getting the newest pine working with Maildir.
One thing I noticed when I set mine up:
you wrote:
> NOTE: Apparently, you must set inbox-path as an absolute path (which
> means you can't set it to ~/Maildir because pine doesn't seem to
> recognize ~/ as /home/
tc lewis wrote:
>
> i use that same patch for pine 4.33. it appears to work much better than
> whatever i was using before. something with pine 4.10 i think.
>
> in pine's config i simply set inbox-path to the string: $MAIL
> /etc/profile.d/qmail.sh exists to s
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote:
> Stefan Laudat wrote:
> > there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org
> > I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago.
>
> I am working on this issue right now. What it'
Stefan Laudat wrote:
>
> there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org
> I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago.
I am working on this issue right now. What it's boiled down to has
been my installing the courier-imap package
> Actually, last I checked those patches don't work with the newest pine
> sources.
>
> In this case RTFM'ing wouldn't help now would it. Perhaps he should have
> asked the list; oh wait he did.
did I say the patches work on the latest pine version ? umm... nope
The RedHat RPM of pine is patched to support Maildirs.
--Pete
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Stefan Laudat wrote:
>
> there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org
> I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago.
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:49:3
there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org
I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:49:37PM -0700, Al Sparks wrote:
>
> --- Steven Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm looking for a version of
--- Steven Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a version of Pine that will read messages from Maildir
> directly, rather than moving them to 'mail'. Anyone know of any?
>
> Thanks,
> Steven
To my knowledge, pine does not directly read Maildir
I'm looking for a version of Pine that will read messages from Maildir
directly, rather than moving them to 'mail'. Anyone know of any?
Thanks,
Steven
excuse me for question too particular!!!
I have a problem with PINE version <4.00
How can I see the all folders created on the server ?? With the PINE versions >4.00
it's possible with CollectionList option but with version <4 it'is impossible for me
I have tried (wi
Hi Eric, Hi All,
| The personal configuration file: $HOME/.pinerc and
Ok I modified this to: inbox-path=home/username
and pine don't complains about the settings. But
instead he says there arent't any messages. But I sent
one locally with qmail using echt to: ... and in the
curren
The answer to this question is somewhat counterintuitive but it is in
INSTALL.mbox file:
* pine: Put "inbox-path=Mailbox" in your system-wide pine.conf...
I followed the example given in the pine.conf comments - "...default is the
local INBOX (/usr/spool/mail/$USER)"
> > in /usr/local/lib/pine.conf.fixed
>I've tried to edit my pine config before,
>but - believe me - there isn't any config at all.
>I've done a find -name "*pine*" and _no_ config
>at all?!
Thomas:
There are two configuration files for pine:
The per
>I've tried to edit my pine config before,
>but - believe me - there isn't any config at all.
ok, so create one...
and like I said, you can put in Mailbox instead of Maildir
system wide configs (like this) should go either in
/usr/local/lib/pine.conf or /usr/local/lib
Hi,
> mail-directory=Maildir
I wanna use Mailbox not Maildir.
> in /usr/local/lib/pine.conf.fixed
I've tried to edit my pine config before,
but - believe me - there isn't any config at all.
I've done a find -name "*pine*" and _no_ config
at all?!
>
> I do
I set :
mail-directory=Maildir
in /usr/local/lib/pine.conf.fixedI guess you would need to set it to
Mailbox?
I do not set the inbox-path (not sure why you would for maildirs, anyone
know?), works fine for pine4.32 with patch-for-maildirs
--
Regards,
Jason Kawaja, UF-ECE Sys Admin
Hi,
I read the archive and the INSTALL.mbox file
and can't convince Pine opening my localy
delivered mails.
I assume that the delivery will work:
@40003aad24ea1bd07db4 info msg 224657: bytes 204 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 10101 uid 0
@40003aad24ea1c292cd4 starting deli
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:32:29AM +, James R Grinter wrote:
> > But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real
> > reason for existence?) So hook your Maildirs up with IMAP, and point
>
Just to stick in another random opinion:
I've been pretty pine die hard for almost 3 years now.
I tried out mutt about a month ago, and just couldn't make the switch.
Went back to pine and Mailbox, despite personally preferring Maildir.
Tried it again about 3 days ago due to peer pr
> > PINE may be limited, but it sure is useful as a quick and dirty
> > console-base MUA. I figured out how to use in in about 3 minutes
> > without having to RTFM.
>
> If you've ever had to deal with the code, dirty is definitely an accurate
> description.
Peter Cavender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PINE may be limited, but it sure is useful as a quick and dirty
> console-base MUA. I figured out how to use in in about 3 minutes
> without having to RTFM.
If you've ever had to deal with the code, dirty is definitely an
> > But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real
> > reason for existence?) So hook your Maildirs up with IMAP, and point
> > Pine at that.
> >
> > Seems pretty simple to me.
>
> How about this: Use a non-crappy, open
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:32:29AM +, James R Grinter wrote:
> But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real
> reason for existence?) So hook your Maildirs up with IMAP, and point
> Pine at that.
>
> Seems pretty simple to me.
How about
"Pavel Kankovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Adam McKenna wrote:
>
> > The author of PINE flat out refuses to support Maildir.
>
> Umm...doesn't it sound familiar? ;)
But, it doesn't mat
* mrorange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can I use Pine with qmail/sqwebmail?
Yes/no.
> Apparently sqwebmail is dependent upon a maildir directory format and
> when I run Pine it sets up a regular mail directory (/var/mail/spool?)...
Do you have the slightest clue what you&#
Can I use Pine with qmail/sqwebmail? Apparently sqwebmail is dependent upon
a maildir directory format and when I run Pine it sets up a regular mail
directory (/var/mail/spool?)...Is there a config I'm missing somewhere?
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Adam McKenna wrote:
> The author of PINE flat out refuses to support Maildir.
Umm...doesn't it sound familiar? ;)
--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open you
ertainly not very objective reasoning.
> >
> > This is coming from someone who doesn't know what capitalization
> > is. But you can't please them all, right?
>
> this is the absolute worst argument i've ever heard in my entire life.
> don't ever email me ag
e absolute worst argument i've ever heard in my entire life.
don't ever email me again.
> > for now i'm still using an old pine with the maildir patch, as that mutt
> > date interpretation thing simply makes it impossible for me to use.
>
> Like I said I'
he web pages, just makes me think that the author
> is an idiot. but that's certainly not very objective reasoning.
This is coming from someone who doesn't know what capitalization
is. But you can't please them all, right?
> for now i'm still using an old pine with the mail
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 09:56:27PM -0500, Karl Vogel wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:24:05 -0500 (EST),
> >> Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> P> I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-) For
> P> me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail
>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:24:05 -0500 (EST),
>> Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
P> I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-) For
P> me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall be placed
P> in sent folder.
If you want a copy of all your
Hello
>take a few days for most pine users to make the switch.
I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-)
For me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall
be placed in sent folder - Neverless it don't me simple :-(
and I have to less time to sac
; with plesure.
> Are you using babelfish to make your posts? Just wondering.
Nope. The Dialectizer with the "Polish impersonator of the Swedish
Cook(tm) module(R)".
> Mutt is pretty intuitive.
U... Nope. It lacks a --luser-gui switch. But then again, who cares?
> Not qu
hing on the top of mutt's web page,
and some other stuff on the web pages, just makes me think that the author
is an idiot. but that's certainly not very objective reasoning.
old redhat releases of pine included a patch for maildir support.
however, pine is _extremely_ inefficient when it
his is reason, that I don't use
> Mutt with plesure.
Are you using babelfish to make your posts? Just wondering.
Mutt is pretty intuitive. Not quite as intuitive as pine, but it should only
take a few days for most pine users to make the switch.
--Adam
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:12:55AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't
> start a MUA discussion here. If you want pine to support Maildirs natively
> (mutt does btw) contact the pine authors, this is _ways_ O
Hello
>Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't
This is the good opportunity to make functionality of Mutt better.
I let to see to much porblems and this is reason, that I don't use
Mutt with plesure.
Piotr
---
Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 10:42:11PM -, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> In discusion - regard to Maildir versus mailbox question - for
> promoting Maidir were is useful to encourage pine authors to
> adapting the pine program for directly work with Maildir fromat.
maybe you find this
At 10:08 PM 1/7/01 -0800, Al Sparks wrote:
>You weren't specific enough. Did you configure qmail to use the Maildir
>email format or the old INBOX format> Pine uses the INBOX format natively.
>If you're using the Maildir format then you'll have to set up a pop3 or
You weren't specific enough. Did you configure qmail to use the
Maildir email format or the old INBOX format>
Pine uses the INBOX format natively. If you're using the Maildir
format then you'll have to set up a pop3 or imap daemon to still use
pine.
While I've never use
and have configured
my KDE email cleint to work with it.
Now, I want some client from shell mode such as Pine to work.
How can I get my Pine to work with it? I use RedHat Linux with
Pine 4.21.
Thanks in advance and eagerly looking foward for the replies
from all
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 03:53:00PM -0800, Matt Harrington wrote:
>
>
> You have to edit maildir.c in imap/src/osdep/unix (i think; recalling from
> memory). There are 3 options as "#define" in the C source. one of them
> needs to be switched to "#undef" to enable reading from a directory whi
You have to edit maildir.c in imap/src/osdep/unix (i think; recalling from
memory). There are 3 options as "#define" in the C source. one of them
needs to be switched to "#undef" to enable reading from a directory which
contains "Maildir" in the path. I don't know why this option is there.
* David Daugherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 26 Nov 2000, Robin S. Socha wrote:
[...]
>> You need to patch pine (unless something good has happened in pine
>> 4.3) to read Maildir. The patches can be obtained from
>> http://qmail.org/.
> I applied the c-cli
On 26 Nov 2000, Robin S. Socha wrote:
> * David Daugherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just installed qmail 1.03 and I'm using Pine 4.21 on a FreeBSD
> > 4.2Beta box. I was using sendmail and have all of my folders in
> > $HOME/mail. Now I guess qmail
* David Daugherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just installed qmail 1.03 and I'm using Pine 4.21 on a FreeBSD
> 4.2Beta box. I was using sendmail and have all of my folders in
> $HOME/mail. Now I guess qmail wants to use Maildir. So I followed the
> docs and creat
I just installed qmail 1.03 and I'm using Pine 4.21 on a FreeBSD 4.2Beta
box. I was using sendmail and have all of my folders in $HOME/mail. Now I
guess qmail wants to use Maildir. So I followed the docs and created a
Maildir folder and through my shell I can see all of the new emails in
Ma
Hi there,
I've patched my pine and I can read user Maildir format without any additional
conf.
inbox-path =
incoming-archive-folders =
pruned-folders =
read-message-folder =
But I can't read ~alias/Maildir (I tried the obvious guesses in "setup")
Could you point me th
* Robin S. Socha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001103 12:08]:
> I may be entirely dense
s/may be/am/g Damn, I suck... Sorry for the interruption. Now on with
the show.
I maybe entirely dense, but I don't get how the Maildir patches for pine
are supposed to work. I've successfully patched and built pine-4.30 on
FreeBSD-3.4-RELEASE, but I'm stymied: how do I get the equivalent of
mutt -f ~Maildir? Thanks a lot in advance,
Robin
--
Robin S. Soc
Hi
Just joined the list.
I really like pine _and_ like the idea of Maildir, so I'm looking
into applying the patch to my pine 4.21. The problem is, the site
that hosts the patch seems to be down (Jozef Hitzinger's site, have
been down at least all though today and i think yesterd
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:00:37PM -0500, John Lange wrote:
> Since it has been reported that Pine is vulnerable to remote attacks by
> embedding malicious content in the FROM field of messages, and since there
> seems to be no intention from the Pine group to do anything about this
Since it has been reported that Pine is vulnerable to remote attacks by
embedding malicious content in the FROM field of messages, and since there
seems to be no intention from the Pine group to do anything about this, I
was wondering if anyone knows how I can at protect my users from attack
I have got a question about qmailand pine...
I have qmail running on Slackware Linux 7 and it works fine, however, when I
use pine, I have to put localhost in inbox path : {localhost/pop3}
I never installed sendmail on installation of slack so the last posting about
qmail and pine won't
Did I mention
I did this:
IV. QMail and PINE
If you are using pine,
put:
sendmail-path=/usr/sbin/sendmail
-t
inbox-path=$MAIL into /usr/lib/pine.conf.
Thanks,Rick Uphttp://updegrove.nethttp://linuxpeople.cc
Scott D. Yelich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > Don't use pine. Use mutt.
>
> why?
>
> Does mutt support PGP and compressed mailboxes/folders?
Yes. And more.
Charles
--
---
Yelich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Robert Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Javier Vino R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PINE +Qmail
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
> Don't use pine. Use mutt.
why?
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
> Don't use pine. Use mutt.
why?
Does mutt support PGP and compressed mailboxes/folders?
Scott
Don't use pine. Use mutt.
--Adam
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 03:51:14PM +0200, Robert Varga wrote:
>
> Look at www.qmail.org for some patches.
>
> Look at the qmail FAQ for settings in pine.conf (sendmail-path should be
> set, and inbox-path may need to be set).
>
>
> > I had install qmail with Maildirs, and I need setup the pine in my server
> > Anyone how to setup ?
hmm, there are some pathces around but i don't trust them much (the latest
one's for the version 4.20 as far as i know and my version of pine is
4.21. it's a
> I had install qmail with Maildirs, and I need setup the pine in my server
> Anyone how to setup ?
You can patch Pine to read Maildirs, or (as I did), you can install a
patched IMAP server that will read Maildirs, and point Pine to the IMAP
server.
steve
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 07:46:26AM -0500, Javier Vino R. wrote:
> I had install qmail with Maildirs, and I need setup the pine in my server
> Anyone how to setup ?
Go back to the qmail site and search for 'pine'.
Ben
--
The spectre of a polity controlled by the fads and whi
Look at www.qmail.org for some patches.
Look at the qmail FAQ for settings in pine.conf (sendmail-path should be
set, and inbox-path may need to be set).
Regards,
Robert Varga
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Javier Vino R. wrote:
> HI !
> I had install qmail with Maildirs, and I need setup the p
HI !
I had install qmail with Maildirs, and I need setup the pine
in my server
Anyone how to setup ?
JVino
Does anyone know if there is a patch or set of patches for PINE that allow it
to read mail over IMAPS (SSL IMAP)? We may be rolling out SSL IMAP and POP3
where I work, and the Windows clients all support this natively.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
--Adam
I see now, that RH applies the maildir patch and another one called
maildirfix. The maildir patch is Mattias Larsson's.
Mate
It seems I am behind: I just noticed that pine-4.21 supports maildir.
Or is it just the version RH made?
Thx
Mate
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 12:02:30PM -0400, Jonathan Fortin wrote:
>
> How do i get pine to read my qmail maildir?
There are some links to Maildir-patches for Pine/c-client on www.qmail.org
Greetz, Peter.
--
Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder
|
How do i get pine to read my qmail
maildir?
Sorry! The patches didn't work. My fault, should be fixed now:
ftp://158.195.33.220/pub/pine/pine-4.20-maildir_2.patch
ftp://158.195.33.220/pub/pine/pine-4.20-maildir_2.howto
It is _not_ inclusive (as I said before), just plain Maildir patch.
Works fine for me.
--
jozef :-)
Try ftp://158.195.33.220/pub/pine/, the pine-4.20-maildir.patch should be
the one. The rest are older patches included in this one.
Don't use the -sk.patch, it translates most of pine texts into Slovak,
wouldn't be of much use I'd say.
--
jozef :-)
Hi! I'm a .signature
I've D/Led the c-client for Pine and followed the directions.
The problem is that it simply doesn't compile with pine4.21 and
the latest stable GCC. Is there anywhere I can D/L an already
patched source? All the links that I found in the archives seemed
to have dissapeard.
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Philip Mores wrote:
> How can I configure pine using Mailbox instead of using
> /var/spool/mail/user ? I tried following the procedure but it doesn't
> work. Pine has an error something like "no folder".
>
> What should I do? Could someone gi
We use pine here on this machine, what's needed is:
($:~)- cat /etc/pine.conf | grep -A 3 -B 3 MailBox
# Path of (local or remote) INBOX, e.g. ={mail.somewhere.edu}inbox
# Normal Unix default is the local INBOX (usually /usr/spool/mail/$USER).
inbox-path=~/MailBox
# List of incomin
Thus said Philip Mores on Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:17:12 +0800:
> How can I configure pine using Mailbox instead of using
> /var/spool/mail/user ? I tried following the procedure but it doesn't
> work. Pine has an error something like "no folder".
I believe if you set MAIL to
How can I configure pine using Mailbox instead of using
/var/spool/mail/user ? I tried following the procedure but it doesn't
work. Pine has an error something like "no folder".
What should I do? Could someone give me a step by step procedure on how
to do this?
Hope you could hel
This is mine...do i change it?
inbox-path=Mailbox
At 02:05 PM 3/21/00 +0800, you wrote:
>How do i get pine to work with qmail. I did as FAQ says to put:
>
>sendmail-path=/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi -t (into pine.conf)
>
>Doesnt work still
>
>pine error: Can't op
im not sure how I should patch the pine 4.10 source so that it handles
Maildir delivery. I have downloaded the pine4.10-redhat.patch from
ftp://ftp.vestdata.no/pub/linux/c-client/src-1.0/
but I am not sure how to execute the patch so that it modifies the source
files to handle Maildir delivery
jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Here's the deal. I set up vpopmail (or vchkpass, whatever
>you want to call it) for pop mail. It keeps everything in
>/home/vpopmail. But some of my users want to be able to
>check their mail with pine if they need to, or be able to
>d
Here's the deal. I set up vpopmail (or vchkpass, whatever
you want to call it) for pop mail. It keeps everything in
/home/vpopmail. But some of my users want to be able to
check their mail with pine if they need to, or be able to
download it if they need to. (like if they are on the
I'm using a patched for Maildir Pine 4.10 and no problems at all,
just put the Pine-created folders to ~/mail. This explains that
the patched Pine can read both mbox and Maildir format.
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 10:04:43AM +0200, Jozef Hitzinger wrote:
>
> I'm working on a
I'm working on a linux/qmail with ~/Maildir/ delivery for cca 1500 users.
The problem is that we'd like to use pine as the client. I've found
patches for 4.10, but ..
What's current situations in maildir support for pine - anything new with
4.20? If you are using such a
I recall at least a couple of people who were having trouble with the
getting the Maildir-patched pine-4.10 to work, so I thought I'd forward
this insight from Larry.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 20:22:43 -0400
From: Larry Morley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Evan Moore wrote:
> Everything that I have read about pine and Maildirs syas that
> they don't get along; however, after configuring my pinrc
> file to look at the Maidir it reads it's mail with out
> complaint. How is this possible? I'
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Evan Moore wrote:
> Everything that I have read about pine and Maildirs syas that they
> don't get along; however, after configuring my pinrc file to look at
> the Maidir it reads it's mail with out complaint. How is this
> possible? I'm not even
Everything that I have read about pine and Maildirs syas that
they don't get along; however, after configuring my pinrc
file to look at the Maidir it reads it's mail with out
complaint. How is this possible? I'm not even using the newest
version of pine, I just installed pine 3
use
$HOME/Maildir (without the trailing slash) as my pine inbox-path, I have
./Maildir/ in my .qmail file, and my env is:
[richard2 james james]$ echo $MAIL
/usr/home/james/Maildir
Kai speculated that it might have something to do with the Linux shadow
support but I have no idea what the deal i
Hello,
I downloaded the patched for Maildir version of pine-4.10 and built it
on a Solaris 2.6 intel box.
I have tried the following to try to get pine to read my Maildir inbox
// edits to the ~/.pinerc file
inbox-path="inbox"
inbox-path=~/Maildir
inbox-path=~/Maildir/
inbox-path=$HO
Text written by Josh Pennell at 08:53 PM 9/6/99 -0700:
>
>I downloaded the patched pine src from
>http://3.am/pine4.10.maildir.tar.gz and built it on an Intel Solaris 2.6
>box.
This is eerily reminiscent of my troubles with the same version of Pine,
building on a Red Hat Linux 5.1
Greetings,
I read every thread on getting pine-4.10 to work with qmail-1.03 and I
still can't get pine to read the Maildir format.
I downloaded the patched pine src from
http://3.am/pine4.10.maildir.tar.gz and built it on an Intel Solaris 2.6
box.
What I have tried to get pine to read Ma
Text written by James Smallacombe at 04:13 PM 8/21/99 -0400:
>
>After a coupla days of screwing around and a pointer from Ragnar Kjorstad,
>I finally got the various patches to work with pine 4.1. If Russ still
>wants to put it up on the qmail site, or if anybody else wants to check
nar Kjorstad,
I finally got the various patches to work with pine 4.1. If Russ still
wants to put it up on the qmail site, or if anybody else wants to check it
out, the patched source is at: http://3.am/pine4.10.maildir.tar.gz
It's hard to follow who did which patches, except that it looks like
Mat
o move forward as well. DJB's licensing stance
> doesn't help this, but AFAIK, there's nothing standing in the way of
> distributing patched for Maildir tarballs (please, NOT RPMs!) of the
> latest Pine and IMAP on www.qmail.org.
I'd be happy to host them there.
--
-rus
> From: Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:51:59 -0400 (EDT)
>
> 2) Sendmail's performance still lags far behind current-generation
>MTA's.
...and will continue to as long as it runs that stupid rule based system to
rewrite addresses that don't need to be rewritten.
Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 August 1999 at 15:51:59 -0400
> James Smallacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >For sure. In the past 3+ years I've been running qmail, Sendmail's gotten
> >a whole lot better, both from a security standpoint, and an ease of
> >configuration sta
James Smallacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>For sure. In the past 3+ years I've been running qmail, Sendmail's gotten
>a whole lot better, both from a security standpoint, and an ease of
>configuration standpoint.
1) Lack of reported vulnerabilities <> more secure.
2) Sendmail's performance
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
