Hi All, Im using qmail-scanner etc..
I have one problem however, im using fastforward to do aliasing, and qmail-
scanner scan's and print's headers on the email's twice ..
is there any way to make qmail-scanner leave an email it has been scanned
allready?
Regards,
Craig
On 14 Aug 2001 02:47:18 +0200,
Craig Spiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there any way to make qmail-scanner leave an email it has been scanned
allready?
You do not want to do this, because between two runs of the qmail-scanner
is one .qmail file, where it is very simple to add a virus
Hi,
i am having problems with qmail-scanner. Emails without viruses
are delivered without problems, but emails containing viruses
are not. if i send a virus to my server my log file is flooded
with /bin/sh option lists. see this example:
Jul 30 12:02:12 d smtpd: 996487332.723919 sh
s.sunil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on my server if i send one mail with virus throgh sqwebmail
to one of my domain it is working qmail-scanner give it report
perfectly but if somebody send mail from yahoo.com or any
other it will unable to scan it will allow the virus
I think you didn't set
-scanner(0.96) it instlled the
sucessfully
but it works only with my domains meance which are hosted
on my server if i send one mail with virus throgh sqwebmail
to one of my domain it is working qmail-scanner give it report
perfectly but if somebody send mail from yahoo.com or any
other
) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:34 PM
Subject: Qmail-scanner or spam problem??
Hi, in the last few days, I have been getting about 30-50 of the following
error messages daily related to qmail-scanner whereas I used to get only
about 10 a day
hey there everyone,
I'm running into a bit of a snag with the
installation of my qmail-scanner program. When I run ./configure
--install, I get the following error:
X-Qmail-Scanner-0.96: cannot open for write
/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine-attachments.db.tmp - Permission
denied
Insecure
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:19:19PM +0200, Andreas Grip wrote:
Well, a smtp-server receiving a lot of mail can reach the limit of
maximum allowed simultanius connection. If the smtp server close the
connection faster there will be more time over and the server is able to
receive more mail. So
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think this is a great idea; it means you have to accept every message,
then scan them, then generate late bounces, instead of rejecting them during
the initial SMTP conversation.
qmail-scanner do not reject
)
and in several languages :-)
OTOH it is still real-time. An original design decisions behind
Qmail-Scanner - which I am still happy with - was that I wasn't going to
re-invent the wheel and do post-scanning, and I would then have to design my
own queuing system, retries, etc. The way
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using the qmail-queue-patch together with the qmail-scanner and I'm also
thinking about to put some spamfilters before or after the antivirus
scanning.
[...]
Is it ok to let the sending smtp server to wait so long time before
[qmail-scanner] has
At 12:27 07.07.2001 -0600, you wrote:
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm thinking about to create another queue that the mail can be
placed in
first so qmail can tell the sender that it has ben received and then start
to scan and filtering the mail in that queue before it
Lukas Beeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:27 07.07.2001 -0600, you wrote:
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm thinking about to create another queue that the mail can be
placed in first so qmail can tell the sender that it has ben received
and then start to scan and
Charles Cazabon wrote:
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using the qmail-queue-patch together with the qmail-scanner and I'm also
thinking about to put some spamfilters before or after the antivirus
scanning.
[...]
Is it ok to let the sending smtp server to wait so long time
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
connection faster there will be more time over and the server is able to
receive more mail. So I think a server, that are faster with closing the
connection should be more efficient.
Then the backlog is on your server. You still have to scan the mails
Andreas Grip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think this is a great idea; it means you have to accept every message,
then scan them, then generate late bounces, instead of rejecting them during
the initial SMTP conversation.
qmail-scanner do not reject them, it just bounce them.
I
Reworded re-post after off-list discussions.
I guess this is really a netscape issue rather than qmail, but related
to the qmail server at least. I'm running qmail-scanner and get into
problem areas when the scanner detects a virus in a message and sends
the bounce message to the originator
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 02:38:18PM +0800, Brett Leeder wrote:
I, as postmaster, get a LOT of these bounces and because of the
formatting characters in the subject line etc (this is my assumption
anyway), my mail client (Netscape), falls in a heap and is unable to
process the received mail,
straight to you and not the list.
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 29436 invoked by uid 94); 12 Jun 2001 20:39:14 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by ella with qmail-scanner-0.95 (uvscan:
v4.0.50/v4099. . Clean. Processed in 0.487353 secs); 12 Jun 2001
Our web mail (IMP 2.2.4) program injects all mail using qmail-inject, when
the email is totally local (i.e. never travels through SMTP) it is never
scanned. I've tried adding the QMAILQUEUE variable into Apache to try to
trigger the scan but I think it is to far down the loop. Any one have any
John McCoy, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our web mail (IMP 2.2.4) program injects all mail using qmail-inject, when
the email is totally local (i.e. never travels through SMTP) it is never
scanned. I've tried adding the QMAILQUEUE variable into Apache to try to
trigger the scan but I think it
I can see it set in phpinfo() output, but do not know if this is a good test
for that.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 12:18 PM
To: qmail@list. cr. yp. to
Subject: Re: qmail-inject and Qmail-scanner on local message
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:24:49AM -0700, John McCoy, Jr. wrote:
Our web mail (IMP 2.2.4) program injects all mail using qmail-inject, when
the email is totally local (i.e. never travels through SMTP) it is never
scanned. I've tried adding the QMAILQUEUE variable into Apache to try to
trigger
Hi List!
We have been using the qmail-scanner patch for a few weeks and we are very
happy with it.
Currently our system only uses one AV scanner the sophos product, and I want
to use a second AV scanner in parrallel. The second scanner I want to use is
the Trend Micro scanner.
The "
Ross Cooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The "qmail-scanner-queue.pl" file has a the following line:
@scanner_array=("sweep_scanner");
This is where it calls another function which actually calls the scanner.
Does anybody know how to edit this so that t
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 10:45 AM
To:'Qmail Mailing List'
Subject: Re: Qmail Scanner
Ross Cooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The "qmail-scanner-queue.pl" file has a the following line:
@scanner_array=("sweep_scanner");
This is where it ca
ooney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:53 PM
To: 'Qmail Mailing List'
Subject: Qmail Scanner
Hi List!
We have been using the qmail-scanner patch for a few weeks
and we are very
happy with it.
Currently our system only uses one AV scanner the sophos
product
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 06:53:10PM -, Ross Cooney wrote:
Hi List!
We have been using the qmail-scanner patch for a few weeks and we are very
happy with it.
Great to hear :-)
Currently our system only uses one AV scanner the sophos product, and I want
to use a second AV scanner
"Jason" == Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
You will need to reinstall Q-S. I specifically wrote Q-S so that it
only contains code specific to your system. You have added another
virus scanner, so you'll need to do another "./configure etc" to
rebuild the app with support for
Hi Brett,
I suppose I can answer most of your questions...
The qmail-scanner tar file contains a few files with the prefix "sub-" these
contain stuff you needI used the one "sub-iscan.pl" for the Trend micro
scanner, but you have to choose the one that suits you and yo
hi Jason,
Have you tested qmail-scanner with the Command Antivirus Linux scanner?
I am trying it out at the moment...any tips?
Thanks,
Ross
Hi,
there is a list on qmail-scanner, see
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, see your quarantine-attachments.txt file to get instructions on
attachment filtering and/or download latest virus definition files for
your scanner.
Csaba
Original Message
On 2001.03.14, 5:50:21, KIM [EMAIL PROTECTED
hi !
2 in 1 :)
1) qmail-scanner
aboutQmail virus protection.
Are you using the qmail-scanner tool ?
:)
witch antivirus works best with it ?
i have about 6 msg/day local/remote traffic,
will this patch affect on queue i/o performance
hello,
i set up the qmail-scanner and it works. but my problem is when i test it
and tried to send a mail with an attach virus like the snow white nad the
seven dwarf(joke.exe) it still accept it. i used kasperskys AVPLinux Scanner.
thanks in advance!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] by hydepark-jump.vircio.com with
qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.0.50/v4115. . Clean. Processed in 0.328525 secs);
08/03/2001 20:59:42
Received: from mailgate.1starnet.com (HELO mail.1starnet.com) ([207.243.104.248])
(envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED])by cust-46-98
Jrmy Cluzel wrote:
1) as virus-scanner ? amavis or qmail-scanner ? both seem to work
fine...
I've replied to you directly and added Jason Haar into CC, so he can
correct me if I made a wrong assumption. :-) Hopefully I do not need a
dozen of bodyguards ;-)))
2) as antivirus ? H+BEDV AntiVir
Hi,I was using Red Hat 6.2, and qmail as
Mta.My goal is to take virus aware from my mail server, so, what's the best
choice ?
1) as virus-scanner ? amavis or qmail-scanner ?
both seem to workfine...2) as antivirus ? H+BEDV AntiVir, AVP,
Sophos Sweep,or McAfee ViruScan ? I used avp
2) as antivirus ? H+BEDV AntiVir, AVP, Sophos Sweep,or McAfee ViruScan ? I used avp
for a while
(and I find it very efficient), but doesn't know the other ones...
Don't know about H+BEDV AntiVir
McAfee is currently best for detecting new viruses, and has been for a while
AVP is also good at
and wath about scanners ? which is the best one ? and why ?
are they really needed for such antivirus ?
I've heard that some AV (live avp) have their own scanner (which tends to
replace amavis or qmail scanner).
- Original Message -
From: "Alex at messagelabs" [EMAIL
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:23:20AM +0100,
Jrmy Cluzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and wath about scanners ? which is the best one ? and why ?
are they really needed for such antivirus ?
I've heard that some AV (live avp) have their own scanner (which tends to
replace amavis or qmail scanner
favorite is Sophos with-in qmail, I LIKE IT, but this letter isn't meant
to
be a plug.)
Cheers
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Wolff III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Jrmy Cluzel
Cc: Qmail cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]amavis
Well,
I agree wholeheartedly, it's a must to have the desktop covered, but if
you don't try to catch the virii coming in, you'll never have any idea
about what comes in by mail, as most users will soon not tell you about
it anymore.
I use amavis on the internet connected systems, and inflex on
Hi,
I was using Red Hat 6.2, and qmail as Mta.
My goal is to take virus aware from my mail server, so, what's the
best choice ?
1) as virus-scanner ? amavis or qmail-scanner ? both seem to work
fine...
2) as antivirus ? H+BEDV AntiVir, AVP, Sophos Sweep,or McAfee
ViruScan ? I used avp
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 03:58:51PM -, Jrmy Cluzel wrote:
My goal is to take virus aware from my mail server, so, what's the
best choice ?
there are no "best choice" : there are just different solutions :)
All that I can tell you is that qmail-scanner + f-sav is a very
go
Jeremy,
I tried installing qmai-scanner and had some difficulty with the setuid
root issues. qmail-scanner was wanting a new kernel built, which I can't
easily do as it's a remote server. I switched to amavis and think that's
a better solution. It's easy to install and essentially works
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:34:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy,
I tried installing qmai-scanner and had some difficulty with the setuid
root issues. qmail-scanner was wanting a new kernel built, which I can't
Err - I can emphatically state that neither Qmail-Scanner
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:04:18PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all...
Has anyone installed "Time::HiRes" for Qmail-Scanner
yes. install the cpan module, and then run cpan, and type "install Time::HiRes".
Other questions ?
that by stripping any
attachments that could be double-clicked on and contain a virus (ie
vbs, scr, exe soon when I can convince management). I use
qmail-scanner for this. It also helps us to monitor e-mail usage and
see who are the people wasting all our bandwidth sending MPGs, AVIs,
MP3s, etc
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, dennis wrote:
Hi all...
Has anyone installed "Time::HiRes" for Qmail-Scanner
(http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/) on Redhat7.0 ? I'm finding that if I
try and install the modual as an rpm it wants an older version of perl. If
manually install "Time::HiRes&q
Hi,
I was using Red Hat 6.2, and qmail as Mta.
My goal is to take virus aware from my mail server, so, what's the
best choice ?
1) as virus-scanner ? amavis or qmail-scanner ? both seem to work
fine...
2) as antivirus ? H+BEDV AntiVir, AVP, Sophos Sweep,or McAfee
ViruScan ? I used avp
Hi all...
Has anyone installed "Time::HiRes" for Qmail-Scanner
(http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/) on Redhat7.0 ? I'm finding that if I
try and install the modual as an rpm it wants an older version of perl. If
manually install "Time::HiRes" the ./configure can't
Hi all...
I've worked out all the little problems I was having with qmail-scanner,
thanks to who helped.
I have one last question...
I'd like to start qmail-scanner safely as per "life with qmail"
"Life with qmail" starts qmail with /var/qmail/supe
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all...
I've worked out all the little problems I was having with
qmail-scanner, thanks to who helped. I have one last question...
I'd like to start qmail-scanner safely as per "life with qmail"
"Life with qmail" sta
On Thursday 22 February 2001 11:20, Brett Randall wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95# ./qmail-scanner-queue.pl -g
Script is not setuid/setgid in suidperl
ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95#
Trying the test script gives:
ns1:/usr/src
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95# ./qmail-scanner-queue.pl -g
Script is not setuid/setgid in suidperl
ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95#
Trying the test script gives:
ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95/contrib# ./test_installation.sh -doit
- Original Message -
From: Brett Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Hellberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: qmail-scanner wrapper
Sending eicar test virus - should be caught by perlscanner module
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:16:50PM -, John P wrote:
I'm hopeful I did the right thing, but I chmod'ed both /usr/bin/suidperl and
qmail-scanner-queue.pl to 4755, and made them both owned by root. That fixed
the problem.
Agh! Absolutely not!!!
Do NOT run qmail-scanner-queue.pl
Hi, people...
Someone knows if there is a way to enable qmail-scanner to act for just some
users ? I use .qmail file for redirection and i want that qmail-scanner
takes out all attachment of some users...
Thanks,
Alan R.
I've tried getting qmail-scanner to work and don't seem to have much
luck as the suidperl binary won't allow the perl qmail scanner script to
run under suid root. Anyone written a suitable wrapper that the
qmail-scanner docos describe that I could pilfer?
Cheers
Chris
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:19:28AM +1300, Chris Hellberg wrote:
I've tried getting qmail-scanner to work and don't seem to have much
luck as the suidperl binary won't allow the perl qmail scanner script to
run under suid root. Anyone written a suitable wrapper that the
qmail-scanner docos
When running the qmail script with the test flag:
ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95# ./qmail-scanner-queue.pl -g
Script is not setuid/setgid in suidperl
ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95#
Cool, I've seen a solution for this in the FAQ:
snipped from FAQ
Can't do suid some perl distributions
have
"Davi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/22/01 12:02p.m.
On Wednesday 21 February 2001 19:19, you wrote:
I've tried getting qmail-scanner to work and don't seem to have much
luck as the suidperl binary won't allow the perl qmail scanner script
to
run under suid root. Anyone written a suitab
Asked earlier here about virus scanning and qmail, regarding how to set it
up so that i can define in some way which of the domains that should be
scanned. People said that i could use the qmail-scanner (with some
modifications..). The problem is that im not really that good in perl so i
wont
scanning and qmail, regarding how to set it
up so that i can define in some way which of the domains that should be
scanned. People said that i could use the qmail-scanner (with some
modifications..). The problem is that im not really that good in perl so i
wont risk bringing down our mail system
Hi !
I've installed qmail-scanner, and I want it now to forward email to
qmail-rewrite. How I've to set correctly QMAILQUEUE variable to do this.
Thanks ...
Cordialement,
Michel Boucey Administrateur Systme
Socit Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45
Ok. 2 Questions. I've seen a lot of people mention Qmail-scanner, so
1) What is Qmail-scanner?
2) How does one enable it (I'm assuming it's some kind of virus scan system)
Thanks!
-- Dan
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:44:13AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
Ok. 2 Questions. I've seen a lot of people mention Qmail-scanner, so
1) What is Qmail-scanner?
a great interface to use antiviruses with qmail.
http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net
2) How does one enable it (I'm assuming it's some
i think there is no necessary to go to a lawer!
- Original Message -
From: Uwe Ohse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: thanks for you answer my question!but it is none used.
On Wed,
Hi,
Sorry my English, please.
I'm happy with qmail and the users too.
When i can add antivirus support with qmail-scanner, i fall in trouble.
The QMAILQUEUE patch work fine, the installation its ok, but fetchmail ( i
have a dial-up connection ) log the following to
'/var/log/qmail/smtpd/current
Andres Rusconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
suidperl: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: failed to map
segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory
[...]
Can somebody help with this ?
malloc() failed; you're low on memory/swap. Kill some processes and try
again, or add
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andres Rusconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
suidperl: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: failed to map
segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory
[...]
Can somebody help with this ?
malloc() failed; you're low on memory/swap.
Or
Hi,
Thanks sorry
malloc() failed; you're low on memory/swap. Kill some processes and try
It's not a qmail issue,
so it's not appropriate to continue the discussion here.
;;
status)
status qmail
;;
*)
echo "Usage: qmail {start|stop|restart|status}"
exit 1
esac
exit 0
*END*
At this stage the Qmail startup script(s) (e.g. /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail )
will need to be updated so that Qmail knows to use qmail-scann
OK, I'm looking at the qmail-scanner option and installing all the
prerequisite applications. From what I see in the documentation, it looks
like there might be significant increase in my memory/cpu overhead. I'm a
bit worried about this does anyone have experience with qmail-scanner
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:27:45PM +0300, Brian Longwe wrote:
OK, I'm looking at the qmail-scanner option and installing all the
prerequisite applications. From what I see in the documentation, it looks
like there might be significant increase in my memory/cpu overhead. I'm a
bit worried
anybody here installed the qmail-scanner without problem?
Yes.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:14:36PM +0800, KIM wrote:
anybody here installed the qmail-scanner without problem?
--
Albert Hopkins
Sr. Systems Specialist
KIM [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
anybody here installed the qmail-scanner without problem?
Yes. With AvpDaemon it works well.
Martin
Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend
this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers
with 512MB each.
Virus scanners don't solve the problem.
http://www.fefe.de/antivirus/42.zip
Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 20 December 2000 at 19:54:33 +0100
Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend
this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers
Yes they do. But they can also be misused, by for instance the zip file you
provided the link for. My servers did'nt take harm of this file, but I'm
sure that if I did'nt have the free disk space I have on my servers, they
would.
I'm not sure what qmail-scanner does if the process running out
So, do u use the external viru scan software?
or only the qmail-scan defaut?
Which external viru scanner r u using?
how big is the difference both on speed and secutiy?
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:34:35 +0100
"Einar Bordewich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have been using qmail-scann
Hi guys and gals,
I can't compile qmail-scanner on solaris 8.
uudecode fails with an option error
__
bash-2.03# CC=gcc ./configure --admin postmaster --domain
trevda.com --archive /var
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:45:41AM +0800, Paul Tan wrote:
Hi guys and gals,
I can't compile qmail-scanner on solaris 8.
uudecode fails with an option error
broken uudecoder on your system - cannot use uudecode component
Error msg: test-uudecode.tst
Hi, guys
I am thinking to apply the Qmail-scanner to block the virus attachement,
but I am wondering if this thing is a stable and efficient add-on and
worth to have a try, because for our production mail and mail list
server the stability and efficiency is extremely high demand.
Any suggestion
scanner
in at a busy mail server demands a magnitude of 300-400% more cpu
power as compared to running without one.
So, if efficiency is a extremely high demand for you check your ressources.
I don't think that the qmail-scanner alone will have any effect on the
stability tho.
\Maex
Am Die, 19 Dez 2000 schrieb Eric Wang:
Hi, guys
I am thinking to apply the Qmail-scanner to block the virus attachement,
better you try Amavis Scanner. The qmail-scanner is buggy and there isn't
a fix for the wanted patch qmailscanner is asking for.
If someone has fixed the problem, please
to compensate for using the scanner
on a production machine.
-Original Message-
From: Markus Stumpf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 12:46 PM
To: qmail list
Subject: Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 12:30:18PM -0800, Eric Wang wrote
to this list that plugging a virus scanner
in at a busy mail server demands a magnitude of 300-400% more cpu
power as compared to running without one.
So, if efficiency is a extremely high demand for you check your ressources.
I don't think that the qmail-scanner alone will have any effect
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 09:00:38PM +0100, Ruprecht Helms wrote:
Am Die, 19 Dez 2000 schrieb Eric Wang:
Hi, guys
I am thinking to apply the Qmail-scanner to block the virus attachement,
better you try Amavis Scanner. The qmail-scanner is buggy and there isn't
a fix for the wanted patch
Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone out there with an altered distribution of qmail-1.03 that
contains the QMAILQUEUE patch? Pointing people to such a beast would
certainly allow some less experienced people to get going...
Bruce Guenter's qmail SRPM might contain the
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 12:30:18PM -0800, Eric Wang wrote:
I am thinking to apply the Qmail-scanner to block the virus attachement,
but I am wondering if this thing is a stable and efficient add-on and
worth to have a try, because for our production mail and mail list
server the stability
We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend
this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers
with 512MB each.
Also running the QMAILQUEUE patch with no problems.
Here are the viruses trapped since 23/08/2000 15:30:48, and I must say
I have just installed the following packages for qmail virus scanning.
* maildrop (MIME Handlers)
* tnef
* amavis
I had the following ten processes running before I installed it.
supervise qmail-send
supervise qmail-smtpd
/usr/local/bin/multilog t s250
Alan Chung wrote:
Hi!
Hehe, I'm sure Jason "triggers" on this $subject :)
I have just installed the following packages for qmail virus scanning.
* maildrop (MIME Handlers)
* tnef
* amavis
I had the following ten processes running before I installed it.
[cut]
"Olivier M." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately avp is not free, the license-fee for a (linux)
mail-server is about 100$/year.
this would be acceptable. Are the updates automatic, or do they
have to be done manualy ? (wget something, for example).
How should the updates be done
Thanks Martin for your answer.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:47:33AM +0200, Martin Lesser wrote:
Your problems seem to result of a perhaps misconfigured AvpLinux or
AvpDaemon. If you use the trial-version of avp you may run into problems
due to the "semi"-automatic tests done by avp.
I have noticed that it is possible to send infected messages
with sqwebmail running qmail-scanner.
I guess sqwebmail put messages directly in the queue, so it
no qmail-smptd is called and no antivirus is used.
The only solution I could find is reverting to Amavis.
Amavis is bit harder to setup
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 23:26:33 GMT:
I have noticed that it is possible to send infected messages
with sqwebmail running qmail-scanner.
I guess sqwebmail put messages directly in the queue, so it
no qmail-smptd is called and no antivirus is used.
I don't see how you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have noticed that it is possible to send infected messages
with sqwebmail running qmail-scanner.
I guess sqwebmail put messages directly in the queue, so it
no qmail-smptd is called and no antivirus is used.
The only solution I could find is reverting
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
