Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script

t releass on stable > one ..?? > > Appreciate your amazing work on the qmt projects. > > Regards, > > > David J. > > - Original Message - From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:43 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script David J. wrote: Dear Shubes, Thank you very much on your reply, I'll try to look on your URL link. So upgrading won't change my vpopmail users and domains right ..?

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script

vid J. > > > > > - Original Message - From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:10 PM > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script > > >> David J. wrote: >>> Dear All, >>

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script

in changes on the mysql..?? Thank you , David J. - Original Message - From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:10 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script David J. wrote: Dear All, Is it safe

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script

Ed Morrison wrote: > Eric "Shubes" wrote: >> >> This is true. I'm working on that, but the fix is not trivial. >> >> In the meantime, simply do not select djbdns for upgrading, and >> qtp-newmodel >> will upgrade the rest of the packages just fine (AFAIK). djbdns has not >> functionally changed. It

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script

Eric "Shubes" wrote: This is true. I'm working on that, but the fix is not trivial. In the meantime, simply do not select djbdns for upgrading, and qtp-newmodel will upgrade the rest of the packages just fine (AFAIK). djbdns has not functionally changed. It only has a new release number to refl

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script

Ed Morrison wrote: > Eric "Shubes" wrote: >> >> >> I wouldn't use it. I don't know if anyone's maintaining it or not. If >> not, >> then it won't work (it doesn't include libsrs2-toaster which is now >> required). >> >> I'd use qtp-newmodel. It's robust and simple. It'll upgrade your >> toaster to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script

Eric "Shubes" wrote: I wouldn't use it. I don't know if anyone's maintaining it or not. If not, then it won't work (it doesn't include libsrs2-toaster which is now required). I'd use qtp-newmodel. It's robust and simple. It'll upgrade your toaster to the latest ones including letting you insta

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script

David J. wrote: > Dear All, > > Is it safe to use the upgrade script from > http://www.qmailtoaster.com/info/upgrade.sh to upgrade my current > qmailtoaster ..?? > > Does it keep my current configuration, domains, users, password and it's > mails afterward..?? or there are things that I should

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

Shelly wrote: > Im thinking of using the QmailToaster Plus to upgrade my old (read 18 > months) Toaster install - Which version(s)? # rpm -qa | grep toaster > Im not sure if its been covered, but this will > continue to run the current qmail setup, build the new version in the > background Pret

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

|> |> Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C|> 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain |> |> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*> > > > > > > De: Francisco Paco Peralta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 17:58> Para: qmailtoaste

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

Maybe doing in drugs is worth trying, maybe it imporove the carefullness. ;P Q On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:15:16 +0100, David Sánchez Martín wrote: > "Certainy", "out alert system", "I thinks" > > BTW i'm not in drugs, just typed uncarefully :-D -

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

I have noted that the restore processing in the script could use some enhancing. Presently, it simply allows you to restore the configuration files or bypass restoration. Bryan, if you selected to do the restore, then this is a bug. If you chose not to restore, then this is as it should be. Did yo

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

Just done my server and all is ok apart from a default tcp.smtp being installed which was no big issue as it backed up the original. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server. I would to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous. Th

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

mailtoaster.com Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script I totally agree, David. That's why I wrote the qtp-newmodel scripts to do just that! They do everything except the update ahead of time in the sandbox, so the production server is not affected. Then at the appropriate moment, the sys

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

gt; > De: Francisco Paco Peralta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 17:58 > Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script > > > I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production server

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

De: Francisco Paco Peralta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 17:58 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production server and it worked like a cha

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: lunes, 13 de noviembre de 2006 17:58 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production server and it worked like a charm. Ryan Gibbons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

I also ran the qtp-newmodel upgrade using qtp-menu on my production server and it worked like a charm.Ryan Gibbons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server. I wouldto upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a li

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How safe is it to run the upgrade script on a production server. I would to upgrade to the latest packages but I'm a little nervous. Thanks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script

I've tried to upgrade by upgrade.sh, it's very straight forward.  The only concern is that you may have to take down your qmail for a while and wait for all packages to be rebuilt.     Take a look about qmail-toaster plus: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QmailToaster-Plus and http://wiki.qm

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script / whatami.sh

On Oct 22, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Eric "Shubes" wrote: You too seem to have an older version of the script(s), as they no longer have the .sh suffix. You should download the current scripts for best results. I downloaded the ones linked at: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Upgrading#Inst

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script / whatami.sh

Harry Zink wrote: > As good a time as any to ask this - I'm about to proceed with an update > of my QMT installation, and running qtp-whatami.sh yields this: > > qtp-whatami v0.1.1 > DISTRO=CentOS > OSVER=4.4 > ARCH=x86_64 > BUILD_DIST=cnt40 > BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat > This machine's OS is suppo

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script / whatami.sh

As good a time as any to ask this - I'm about to proceed with an update of my QMT installation, and running qtp-whatami.sh yields this: qtp-whatami v0.1.1 DISTRO=CentOS OSVER=4.4 ARCH=x86_64 BUILD_DIST=cnt40 BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat This machine's OS is supported, but this version/arch has not

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Eric "Shubes" wrote: > > Eric, > >> Alternatively, you can use the qtp-* scripts at http://qmt.shubes.net to do >> the upgrade. They take a bit longer to run because they create a sandbox for >> building the binary rpms, however the qmail downtime is

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script?

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Eric "Shubes" wrote: Eric, > Alternatively, you can use the qtp-* scripts at http://qmt.shubes.net to do > the upgrade. They take a bit longer to run because they create a sandbox for > building the binary rpms, however the qmail downtime is minimal. I expect > that this will

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script?

fuzzy wrote: > On Thu, October 5, 2006 12:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> A quick question: I have a newly built toaster (end of July of this year) >> on CentOS 4.x which I'm finally getting ready to deploy. >> >> Before I do so, is it necessary/appropriate to run the upgrade sc

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script?

On Thu, October 5, 2006 12:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Greetings, > > A quick question: I have a newly built toaster (end of July of this year) > on CentOS 4.x which I'm finally getting ready to deploy. > > Before I do so, is it necessary/appropriate to run the upgrade script I > just found

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade Script?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Greetings, > > A quick question: I have a newly built toaster (end of July of this year) > on CentOS 4.x which I'm finally getting ready to deploy. > > Before I do so, is it necessary/appropriate to run the upgrade script I > just found on the toaster website, or am I b

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: I got exactly the same response within /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/: /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/qmt/ ? /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/qmt/caller Just to let the list know, Ron and I took this off list and the new upgrade script has been successfully tested on CentOS4 64-bit. In t

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

George Sweetnam wrote: Eric, You should include a link to your website (test installation qmt) in your sig file. I had some time this afternoon on a fedora5 box and was going to run it. Repost the link if you would and I'll see if I can test build for you. George Sweetnam. Thanks, Georg

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

link if you would and I'll see if I can test build for you. George Sweetnam. - Original Message - From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 3:05 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script e

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 3:05 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love Ron Jones wrote: >> # ls -l /bin/bash > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 772760 Feb 17 20

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: # ls -l /bin/bash -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 772760 Feb 17 2005 /bin/bash # ls -l /lib/libtermcap.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Sep 29 2005 /lib/libtermcap.so.2 -> libtermcap.so.2.0.8 # ls -l /lib/libdl.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Mar 22 06:00 /lib/libdl.so.2 -> libdl-

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: Did you see it the script create /usr/lib64 and /lib64 directories? Do /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/lib64 and /opt/qmt-sandbox/lib64 directories exist I'm guessing not. Actually they do: /opt/qmt-sandbox/lib64/ /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/lib64/ Are both there What does # uname -m tell you?

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

>Did you see it the script create /usr/lib64 and /lib64 directories? >Do /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/lib64 and /opt/qmt-sandbox/lib64 directories exist >I'm guessing not. Actually they do: /opt/qmt-sandbox/lib64/ /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/lib64/ Are both there >What does # uname -m tell you? I've probably g

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: Has it started into the compiles yet, or is it still building the sandbox? It errored out again... "chroot: cannot run command '/usr/src/qmt/qmt-build-rpms.sh' : No such file or directory Build failed, Exiting." Well... Is there a log file somewhere that may give a more spe

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

>Has it started into the compiles yet, or is it still building the sandbox? It errored out again... "chroot: cannot run command '/usr/src/qmt/qmt-build-rpms.sh' : No such file or directory Build failed, Exiting." Well... Is there a log file somewhere that may give a more specific reason behind

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Last step in the sandbox /usr/var Now it's REALLY time to go get coffee - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Has it started into the compiles yet, or is it still building the sandbox? still building the sandbox, /usr/share That seems to take a while - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: Thanks for the offer, Ron. I don't have one, but will keep you in mind should the need arise. I guess we're using yours anyhow! :) Well, it's running right now... We'll see ;) Has it started into the compiles yet, or is it still building the sandbox? -- -Eric 'shubes'

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Thanks for the offer, Ron. I don't have one, but will keep you in mind should the need arise. I guess we're using yours anyhow! :) Well, it's running right now... We'll see ;) - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: That would do it all right. ;) I wasn't aware that these directories existed! It's going to take me a little while to do fix this right. I'll let you know when it's ready, hopefully by tomorrow. If you don't have a 64-bit box to play with, you're welcome to use mine. Ron

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ok Ron. A 64-bit compatible (I hope) script is available now. Please download it and give it a try. It shouldn't hurt anything if it doesn't work (but you do have a backup, right?). You'll need to recreate the sandbox when you run it. You should see the /usr/lib64 and /lib64 directories create

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

>That would do it all right. ;) I wasn't aware that these directories existed! >It's going to take me a little while to do fix this right. I'll let you know when it's ready, hopefully by tomorrow. If you don't have a 64-bit box to play with, you're welcome to use mine. Ron --

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Eric, This will fail because your sandbox doesn't copy (link?) the /lib64 and /usr/lib64 directories which contain the 64 bit libs. Your script is not 64-bit safe yet and will need some work and testing. Thanks, Erik Oops :) Well, I can't write, but I can test. --

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

> # ls -l /bin/bash -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 772760 Feb 17 2005 /bin/bash > # ls -l /lib/libtermcap.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Sep 29 2005 /lib/libtermcap.so.2 -> libtermcap.so.2.0.8 > # ls -l /lib/libdl.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Mar 22 06:00 /lib/libdl.so.2 -> libdl-2.3.4.so > # ls -

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

> I got exactly the same response within /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/: >/opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/qmt/ ? /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/qmt/caller - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Erik Espinoza wrote: Eric, This will fail because your sandbox doesn't copy (link?) the /lib64 and /usr/lib64 directories which contain the 64 bit libs. Your script is not 64-bit safe yet and will need some work and testing. Thanks, Erik On 8/21/06, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eric

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Erik Espinoza wrote: P.S. What took you so long to chime in on this? I've been trying to field ones that hadn't been responded too by the major users such as you and Jake. I'll try to pay more attention. Erik I'm just yankin' your chain. Me a major user? Not compared to you and Jake! (I'm

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

P.S. What took you so long to chime in on this? I've been trying to field ones that hadn't been responded too by the major users such as you and Jake. I'll try to pay more attention. Erik - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Host

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

That would do it all right. ;) I wasn't aware that these directories existed! It's going to take me a little while to do fix this right. I'll let you know when it's ready, hopefully by tomorrow. Thanks, Erik! P.S. What took you so long to chime in on this? ;) Erik Espinoza wrote: Eric, This

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Eric, This will fail because your sandbox doesn't copy (link?) the /lib64 and /usr/lib64 directories which contain the 64 bit libs. Your script is not 64-bit safe yet and will need some work and testing. Thanks, Erik On 8/21/06, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eric "Shubes" wrote: > Ron

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Eric "Shubes" wrote: Ron Jones wrote: Ok... [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmt]# chroot /opt/qmt-sandbox Returned: "chroot: cannot run command '/bin/bash' : No such file or directory" Ron, That's basically the same error I experienced during testing (I'm not getting it now, on two separate boxes). I

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: Then: [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmt]# ./caller About to call Chroot: cannot run command '/usr/src/qmt/called' : No such file or directory Returned from called 0=./caller 1= 2= 3= 'called' needs to be withing the chroot'd environment, i.e. it needs to be in /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

> Then: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmt]# ./caller > About to call > Chroot: cannot run command '/usr/src/qmt/called' : No such file or > directory Returned from called 0=./caller 1= 2= 3= > > 'called' needs to be withing the chroot'd environment, i.e. it needs to be in /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/qmt. M

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: Did you create the 'called' script in the same manner? Oops.. Lol No Ok, what I've just done is gone to /usr/src/qmt; Cp caller called 'caller' is different than 'called'. 'caller' should be: # cat /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/qmt/called echo "0=$0 1=$1 2=$2 3=$3" exit Th

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

>Did you create the 'called' script in the same manner? Oops.. Lol No Ok, what I've just done is gone to /usr/src/qmt; Cp caller called Then: [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmt]# ./caller About to call Chroot: cannot run command '/usr/src/qmt/called' : No such file or directory Returned from called 0=./c

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: I used two 'test' scripts when I was testing this problem: # cat caller echo "about to call" p1=parm1 p2=parm2 p3=parm3 chroot /opt/qmt-sandbox \ /usr/src/qmt/called \ $p1 \ $p2 \ $p3 echo "returned from called" # cat called echo "0=$0 1=$1 2=$2 3=$3" exit T

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmt-sandbox]# ldd bin/bash libtermcap.so.2 => /lib64/libtermcap.so.2 (0x003aaf70) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x003c9cc0) libc.so.6 => /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 (0x003c9c90) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

I used two 'test' scripts when I was testing this problem: # cat caller echo "about to call" p1=parm1 p2=parm2 p3=parm3 chroot /opt/qmt-sandbox \ /usr/src/qmt/called \ $p1 \ $p2 \ $p3 echo "returned from called" # cat called echo "0=$0 1=$1 2=$2 3=$3" exit Try creating caller,

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmt-sandbox]# ldd bin/bash > libtermcap.so.2 => /lib64/libtermcap.so.2 (0x003aaf70) > libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x003c9cc0) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 (0x003c9c90) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x003c9

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: I just found an easier way to check this out. You should be able to just # cd /opt/qmt-sandbox # ldd bin/bash libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x002bf000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00294000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x00168000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0014f00

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: I just found an easier way to check this out. You should be able to just # cd /opt/qmt-sandbox # ldd bin/bash libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x002bf000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00294000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x00168000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0014f00

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

I just found an easier way to check this out. You should be able to just # cd /opt/qmt-sandbox # ldd bin/bash libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x002bf000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00294000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x00168000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0014f000) What do you get

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: Oops. I forgot the format. Try # chroot /opt/qmt-sandbox That should either give you a shell prompt in the named directory. If it tells you it can't find shell, that the same error as we're seeing in the script. We'll take it from there. Ok... [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmt]# chroot /

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: Ok... [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmt]# chroot /opt/qmt-sandbox Returned: "chroot: cannot run command '/bin/bash' : No such file or directory" Ron, That's basically the same error I experienced during testing (I'm not getting it now, on two separate boxes). I expected such. At leas

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

>Oops. I forgot the format. Try ># chroot /opt/qmt-sandbox >That should either give you a shell prompt in the named directory. If it tells you it can't find shell, that the same error as we're seeing in the script. We'll take it from there. Ok... [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmt]# chroot /opt/qmt-sandbox R

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: This error drove me nuts one time testing. I can't yet remember the solution. Unfortunately I didn't ask the question on my local LUG or I'd have posted the answer. I really need to make notes sometimes. Yes, I know the feeling, I've got to document more than I do Ok, let's

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

>This error drove me nuts one time testing. I can't yet remember the >solution. Unfortunately I didn't ask the question on my local LUG or I'd >have posted the answer. I really need to make notes sometimes. Yes, I know the feeling, I've got to document more than I do >Ok, let's see if we can n

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

Ron Jones wrote: I don't have reason to believe that the "No such file" problem is fixed, but I'd like you to do this (again): .) delete the scripts you have .) reboot the server if at all feasible. /etc/mtab might be a bit wacky with the abnormal exits, and I just want to eliminate that from

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors - Still no love

>I don't have reason to believe that the "No such file" problem is fixed, but I'd like you to do this (again): >.) delete the scripts you have >.) reboot the server if at all feasible. /etc/mtab might be a bit wacky with the abnormal exits, and I just want to eliminate that from a possibility >.) d

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

>I don't have reason to believe that the "No such file" problem is fixed, but I'd like you to do this (again): >.) delete the scripts you have >.) reboot the server if at all feasible. /etc/mtab might be a bit wacky with the abnormal exits, and I just want to eliminate that from a possibility >.)

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

Ron Jones wrote: That still doesn't explain how /usr/src got wiped out though. You didn't run it with SANDROOT=/usr/src did you? Well... I don't believe so. Also: During the last 40 minutes, I've been running a fresh instance of the upgrade script, it failed again. Just to make sure everyth

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

Ron Jones wrote: This is disturbing to me. You didn't point the SANDROOT variable to /usr/src, did you? That would be not a good thing. I should probably mention in the wiki something about making it a *new* directory that doesn't already exist. I don't see how the script otherwise could wipe ou

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

Ron Jones wrote: That still doesn't explain how /usr/src got wiped out though. You didn't run it with SANDROOT=/usr/src did you? Well... I don't believe so. Also: During the last 40 minutes, I've been running a fresh instance of the upgrade script, it failed again. Just to make sure everyth

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

That still doesn't explain how /usr/src got wiped out though. You didn't run it with SANDROOT=/usr/src did you? Well... I don't believe so. Also: During the last 40 minutes, I've been running a fresh instance of the upgrade script, it failed again. Just to make sure everything worked as it sho

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

Ron Jones wrote: This is disturbing to me. You didn't point the SANDROOT variable to /usr/src, did you? That would be not a good thing. I should probably mention in the wiki something about making it a *new* directory that doesn't already exist. I don't see how the script otherwise could wipe ou

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

This is disturbing to me. You didn't point the SANDROOT variable to /usr/src, did you? That would be not a good thing. I should probably mention in the wiki something about making it a *new* directory that doesn't already exist. I don't see how the script otherwise could wipe out the contents of /

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

Ron Jones wrote: P.S. I've changed permissions of both scripts to 755 so this shouldn't happen again, provided that wget preserves permission settings. I just changed the permissions to 755 and it's running as we 'speak,' so I'll keep you posted. An interesting aside... When it didn't work

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

Ron Jones wrote: I'm guessing that ownership of qmt-bulid-rpms.sh isn't root. Oops, my bad. I gather you obtained the scripts under a different user id. No, I started with: su - Then did wget and sh all as root # ls -l /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/qmt/qmt-build-rpms.sh to verify that it's not owne

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

>P.S. I've changed permissions of both scripts to 755 so this shouldn't happen again, provided that wget preserves permission settings. I just changed the permissions to 755 and it's running as we 'speak,' so I'll keep you posted. An interesting aside... When it didn't work the first time, I t

RE: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

>I'm guessing that ownership of qmt-bulid-rpms.sh isn't root. Oops, my bad. I gather you obtained the scripts under a different user id. No, I started with: su - Then did wget and sh all as root # ls -l /opt/qmt-sandbox/usr/src/qmt/qmt-build-rpms.sh to verify that it's not owned by root, then # c

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

Eric "Shubes" wrote: Ron Jones wrote: I'm running CentOS 4.3, and tried running the upgrade script on the wiki (not on a production box, just my home email server) : qmt-newmodel.sh and qmt-build-rpms.sh It seemed to go well through the creation of the sandbox. I got the "Sandbox has been b

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade script errors

Ron Jones wrote: I'm running CentOS 4.3, and tried running the upgrade script on the wiki (not on a production box, just my home email server) : qmt-newmodel.sh and qmt-build-rpms.sh It seemed to go well through the creation of the sandbox. I got the "Sandbox has been built successfully!" me

Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade script

Thanks Jake Regards Devendra > The script to upgrade your Toaster installation is back on my site > (http://v2gnu.com/qmail). Devendra was nice enough to update the old > script I'd thrown together to work with the new packages and distros, so > I've put it back online. Several users have repor