On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bo Peng wrote:
When I installed my redhat 9 system, disk druid recognized my 160G
harddrive and made partition correctly. I am adding another harddrive
and trying to repartition (actually LVMing) the 160G one. However, fdisk
can not even display the partition table
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Flask Ovitch wrote:
Thanks for the link! I've also found another one,
external, for $93 (also a multitech)
http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.asp?EDC=423639
Would be nice to know if there's one that works well
for simply fax and voice, since I don't care at all
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Flask Ovitch wrote:
OK... Which one? Would the $20 USR5660A softmodem
work? Would the $40 USR5699B winmodem work? Or would I
need to go for an external modem? All that I've read
up to now indicates major issues with regards to
caller ID and voice. Does anyone have
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Willem van der Walt[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My bos wants a weekly list of user accesses to our dialup service, showing
at what time who was logged in for how long.
We hav a Cisco 2610 router with 16 integrated modems.
The phone lines is in a hunting group and linked
On 29 May 2003, James Pifer wrote:
If there are no local user accounts, how do you specify who is allowed
access? Is the LDAP-Howto the right howto for this?
Set pam_groupdn in /etc/ldap.conf to a group defined in LDAP that get to
access that specific machine.
--
redhat-list mailing list
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
[SNIP]
You seem to have two major points:
1) RHN ISO downloads add no additional charge to RHN subscribers which
makes it a non-profit distribution. The fact that access to the ISOs via
RHN required a payment should not count as commerical since
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Jim Wilferling wrote:
I'm thinking Ed probably knows the answer to this one...I've heard
mention of a shrike-list, but when I try to find it on RedHat's mailing
list page, its not there. I'm interested in subscribing to shrike list
to see what problems people are having
On 3 Apr 2003, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 15:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
Oh, one last addendum, before I send this: To all the folks who
got it off BitTorrent, how about going BACK to BitTorrent and letting
OTHER folks
This thread is really upsetting me. I will try to go through each of
the comments that I feel need to be commented on below. My answers may
not be complettely correct by I believe them to be more on track than some
of the discussion already in the thread. I'm open to any additional
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is incredible. Linux all over the world. (Anyone using Linux on
the Antartica?)
My understanding is no. You see Linux is too efficient. Running WinXX
products puts added stress/strain on the CPU's. This causes them to
generate more
On 2 Apr 2003, Jeff Bearer wrote:
- How does Red Hat feel about programs like BitTorrent as a primary
method of distribution?
If your willing to use BitTorrent to avoid paying $60 then you would
probably also be willing to wait a week to avoid paying $60. Even if
BitTorrent
On 2 Apr 2003, Jeff Bearer wrote:
- How does Red Hat feel about programs like BitTorrent as a primary
method of distribution?
Was my post really that hard to understand? It seemed pretty clear to
me but it should, I wrote it. Let me try to explain.
Pretend I posted this next Monday
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jason Cordes wrote:
I'm using a rbl on my sendmail server here for my company but that has only
lightly cut down on the amount of spam some of my users get. Is spamassasin
only used to protect a single persons
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
I want to correct at least one egregious error in this
list of correcting errors; it's a big one, though.
Again, bootleg would be the wrong term but if you mean that
you can not
violate the license then your wrong--all you need to do to
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Max Z. wrote:
I have a few questions concerning the upcoming RedHat Linux 9.0 release:
1. Due to the implementation of the new threading tech, would I be able to
recompile redhat included kernel?
Oddly worded question... the new threading model will not make it easier
On 28 Mar 2003, Michael Wardle wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 03:29, Ubaidul Khan wrote:
Does anyone know if Redhat 9.0 will provide support of XFS (sgi's high
performance file system)? I heard some talk of the new kernel (2.4.21)
supporting XFS.
I don't see any mention of XFS in the
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
Paul Greene wrote:
If you disable sendmail in rc3.d or rc5.d, does it disable it
completely? Or does it just disable it's ability to receive mail, but
will still send mail when needed?
It will no longer be running, so you can't connect to
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, T. Ribbrock wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 10:44:05PM -0500, Colburn wrote:
That's encouraging. Sounds like M$ ... or the government ... customers
[...]
No it doesn't. RH has *never* published release dates. At least not in
the time between 4.1 and now. MS *always*
On 16 Mar 2003, Colburn wrote:
Thousands of patches and kludges later RH8 is functional but well behind
the curve. Anyone know if/when RedHat intends to release a
significantly upgraded version? (I am sick of wasting time trying to
get things to work, or fixing things the updates break.)
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
What recommendations do you all have for credit card gateway services?
I'm looking for something cheap, works with Red Hat, and has a nice Perl
interface.
Any ideas?
You mean like HKS CCVS that Red Hat bought and killed?
Don't blink... now you
The easiest way to track it down is to use du with the -x flag which will
exclude other filesystems (such as /proc, /mnt/Windows, /usr /var) so
the command line ends up being:
du -x | sort -rn | head -n 20
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Mikevl wrote:
I can somebody please help me out with this.?
What kernel version are using?
Is there any kernel Oops produced on the console?
If there is a kernel Oops then you should try a newer kernel. If your on
the latest Red Hat kernel then you should submit the Oops to
http://bugzilla.redhat.com. If your on the latest stable kernel compiled
On 6 Mar 2003, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
I mucked up my system by trying to reinstall XP on one of the partitions
on my /dev/hda - of course, it hosed up my otherwise perfectly good,
perfectly working lilo. In trying to get BACK to my beloved and stable
RH, I made the /boot active via using FDISK
I just recieved email with the subject Red Hat Network Announcement
which included the following claim:
- Priority bandwidth during heavy traffic periods. Paid subscribers have
immediate access to errata and ISOs, ensuring that their systems are
kept up to date and always secure.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Kittendorf, Craig wrote:
I have upgraded to RH 8.0 and am trying to get Postfix and SpamAssassin to
work. When I send email to a user on this machine, I receive lots of
messages like the following:
Permission denied
Failed to run SPAM_PHRASES_040 SpamAssassin
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
I'm using parted to resize a 20GB partition down to 5GB. It's taken
quite awhile so far. How long should I expect this particular task to take?
That can depend on the file system type (vfat, ext2, etc), amount of file
system used/free, number
Normally you chroot on a per *process* level instead of per user. But,
the PAM_chroot module does allow it to happen on a per user basis provided
that the program calling PAM is running root at the time it does so.
Since the SSH server package that comes with Red Hat 8.0 still does not
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Andy Kirk wrote:
I was until about an hour confident that my SMTP relay was secure. At that
time, I received a spam email promoting 1,000,000 email address, that
appears to have been sent from my mail server. At least, the From says
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and from looking
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Ed Wilts wrote:
I still stand by my claim that ftp is more secure than sftp...
.../Ed
I'll make you a bet, I will bet you $500 if:
1) You go to the center of the Def Con Eleven Capture the Flag room on
August 1st at noon
2) Yell out three times I stand by my
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Mike Burger wrote:
up2date -l will list the updates available for your system (according to
what you have installed on your system) that have not yet been
updated/installed.
up2date -u will download and install everything available, without your
having to list the
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
Well, I've figured out why PHP doesn't work, and in doing so tied in my
other post about php.ini. RedHat, for reasons I don't quite
understand, have decided to change the value of short_open_tag to
Off. It is on by default on 7.3, but the
On 3 Jan 2003, Cliff Wells wrote:
So the question is whether providing source on their website (and
numerous mirrors) constitutes medium customarily used for software
interchange. I'll agree that that's a question for the lawyers, and
I'll assume Redhat has already hired some who assure them
The problem is more likely Exchange's SMTP gateway than sendmail. Rather
than trying to have Exchange push email to bugzilla, you may want to have
the bugzilla pull from Exchange. Anotherwords, setup an Exchange account
to recieve bugzilla mail and then have the RH box pull from the POP/IMAP
Looks like your trying to get limewire running on top of Kaffe. You need
to get an offical Java2 Runtime such as the IBM JRE v1.3.1 in RPM format.
On 3 Jan 2003, greg wrote:
Hi list,
I am trying to install limewire on my RH8 box. When I run the
installer, this is the message I have
Slashdot included for Jan 1st a link to The State of GNU/Linux in 2002:
It was Good.
( http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=188 )
The article included several statements about controversial moves by
Red Hat during 2002. However, it seems to me that the most damning move
Depends on the service that I want to run on the server. For SMTP, IMAP,
BIND and SMB services I am confortable with RH 8.0. For Apache with
mod_php, I am still using RH 7.3. For CUPS (Common Unix Printing System),
I would recommend that any novice administator either switch back to RH's
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:21:27AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The article included several statements about controversial moves by
Red Hat during 2002. However, it seems to me that the most damning move
is the GPL and LGPL violations associated
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:28:24PM -0600, Gary wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:52:08AM -0700 or thereabouts, Craig Cameron wrote:
Hi all, my machine is a Pentium 2/400 running Redhat Linux 7.2, with minimal
install(networking and DNS Bind). I've
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:28:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on the following information below issued in August of 2002, who do
you consider the distribitor of the GPL/LGPL violation (note despite the
claim of working promptly that the
Yes. There has been a history of problems with intermixing closed
source and non-redistributable packages with the largely open source
distribution such that it is hard to provide an equivlent freely
redistributable version. Caldera had done this for a while in an attempt
to collect per-seat
On 2 Jan 2003, Ben Russo wrote:
I've been told by a few people that if I pay $799 for a set of
RHAS CD's that I am not allowed to install it on more than one
machine.
You are not permitted to recieve support for more machines than you
licensed.
Last time I checked anaconda and RPM are
On 2 Jan 2003, Ben Russo wrote:
I'm not trying to steal anything from RedHat. And I will use another
distribution if I have to. But if the packages are GPL'd then RedHat
has no right to stop me from redistributing the packages that are on
my office server, right? Even if they are binary,
Details on how to get remote root access via CUPS is detailed on iDEFENSE
at http://www.idefense.com/advisory/12.19.02.txt (notice the date)
The RH provided cups-1.1.15-10 is problematic but cups-1.1.17-4 from
Rawhide is not. But having to keep track of Rawhide for security issues
that could
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, CM Miller wrote:
If you deploy 7.3 or 8.0, you will need to upgrade
before the end
of the year because Red Hat has announced the
end-of-life of both 7.3
and 8.0 for Dec 31. That means no more security or
any other RHN upgrades after that date.
Really, is this true?
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Brian Ashe wrote:
Ben Russo,
On Thursday January 02, 2003 06:33, Ben Russo wrote:
I've been told by a few people that if I pay $799 for a set of
RHAS CD's that I am not allowed to install it on more than one
machine.
Read this page...
How to approach this depends on if you willing to force your users to
fudge their POP/IMAP login names or not.
By forcing them to modify their login name to not be identical to their
email username then you can do purely soft virtual POP/IMAP accounts
where you only need to make a trival
There are many flavors of xDSL (ADSL, SDSL, RDSL, etc.). Whatever DSL
gateway or bridge model someone recommends may or may not work with the
flavor you end up subscribing to. It is preferable to find a DSL provider
that claims to support Linux. It is also usually easier to find an
I don't think DirecTV DSL was ever available in the UK.
I also had their service and the gateway did work fine with Linux. The
actual reliablity of the service and availablity of their technical
support was a complettely different matter.
Btw, being complette jerks to their customers seems to
I am working with friends in the GNU/Linux Users of Northern Illinois on
putting together a web page detailing the issues with the following
product:
Dell(TM) PowerEdge(TM) Web Server Version 3.1 Powered by Red Hat Linux
I am seeking any feedback which would indicate if any of the
I can not find any such written notice right now at the URL you give
below.
The General Public License states that the notice must be given at the
time of redistribution of the GPL work. Is there someplace on the Dell
website that I can download the Dell PowerEdge Web Server Version 3.1
I ordered and recieved the Dell(TM) PowerEdge(TM) Web Server Version 3.1
Powered by Red Hat Linux (SKU P/N 420-0835) in October of this year.
These software CDs include several GPL/LGPL packages that normally come
with Red Hat GNU/Linux v7.2 as well as some GPL works and modified works
that
You did not really answer the question. Which of the five items that make
up SKU P/N 420-0835 provide this or a similar written notice?
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ordered and recieved the Dell(TM) PowerEdge(TM) Web
Server Version 3.1 Powered by Red Hat Linux (SKU P/N
Taken from http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/s.html#segmentation_fault
segmentation fault n. [Unix] 1. [techspeak] An error in which a
running program attempts to access memory not allocated to it and core
dumps with a segmentation violation error. This is often caused by
improper
For the FreshRPMS Valhalla Synaptic, I have reliably always gotten
Synaptic to run. But with the current FreshRPMS Psyche Synaptic, half the
time it seems to want the update seeded before Synaptic even starts or
sometimes Synaptic will *immediately* close out with an error message that
it can't
In a web browser go to http://www.freshrpms.net/
Download apt
Download synaptic
As root run: rpm -Uvh apt* synaptic*
As root run: apt-get update
As root run: synaptic
Scroll through the list of package and select xine
Click the Install button
Click the Proceed! button
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002,
Well, it sounds like you already found bugzilla. Your next steps should
be:
- create a bugzilla account
- login to the bugzilla account
- query one of the bugs that your modification should fix
- do a find in this page for Create a new attachment
- select to create a new attachment
The kernel-2.4.9-34.i386.rpm I just downloaded from rpmfind.net passed a
rpm -K verification just fine. Can you be more specific about why your
unconfortable about using RPMs that can be confirmed as signed by RH when
they come from rpmfind.net? Also, are you aware that RH now distributes
2.4.18
Modify id:3:initdefault in /etc/inittab from runlevel 3 to 5
Reboot
Make the desired selection during login to gdm
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Sudhaker P wrote:
Is the any way we can shift beween GNOME and KDE if we have both installed
on the desktop.
I'd appreciate your suggestions.
Peram
--
As far as I know, the biggest issues you should be aware of when
redistributing the downloadable version of Red Hat GNU/Linux is:
1) the majority of the CD binaries are covered by the GPL/LGPL, you must
either provide the source code or provide a written offer that you will
provide the
Silly answer:
Yes, but you first need to get Bochs running on the installed AIX v3.
Serious answer:
IBM has NEVER been very open about the programming specs for Micro
Channel. Some work was done to figure out the x86 flavor of Micro Channel
but nothing has really been done with RS/6000
60 matches
Mail list logo
