On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:56:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:13:04 -0700, David Demner wrote:
I have a question about up2date. I recently noticed that the
most recent version of OpenSSL available on their website
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 14:57:41 -0700, David Demner wrote:
Does apt use the same backport technique?
How could it? It's just a package tool.
Or are you always getting the
latest/greatest/potentially incompatible version of the software by using
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 12:09, Kent Borg wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:56:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html
- --
Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.
Hello Martin,
Hi,
When I try to use up2date I get the following
error:
File /usr/lib/python2.2/httplib.py, line
581, in _send_output
self.send(msg)
File /usr/lib/python2.2/httplib.py, line
560, in send
self.sock.sendall(str)
File
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When I try to use up2date I get the following
error:
..
File /usr/lib/python2.2/httplib.py, line
581, in _send_output
self.send(msg)
File /usr/lib/python2.2/httplib.py, line
560, in send
self.sock.sendall(str)
File
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:13:04 -0700, David Demner wrote:
I have a question about up2date. I recently noticed that the most recent version of
OpenSSL available on their website was version 0.9.7c (which purportedly contains
important bugfixes) but
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:56:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:13:04 -0700, David Demner wrote:
I have a question about up2date. I recently noticed that the most recent version
of OpenSSL available on their website
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 11:10, Jason Dixon wrote:
I'm looking for an exhaustive list of return codes for up2date. The
manpage claims only two: 0 (success) and 1 (failure). However, I've
managed to trap a 256 as well, so I was wondering if anyone's seen
anything authoritative.
I've found the
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 18:23, Ueoka, Kelly J. wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know if there's an rpm out that allows for the
reinstallation of the up2date applet on a Redhat 7.3 system?
Thanks,
Kelly J. Ueoka
Kauai Island Utility Cooperative
Systems Support Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vince, I use up2date on a regular basis to keep several systems up to date.
The features you mention, updating critical parts and apps, while
maintaining
dependencies are all available through up2date.
I'm not familiar with apt, but one feature I found nice is the web interface
to
up2date. If the
thanks Dave. I agree that the web interface to schedule updates for
remote systems is a nice feature of up2date, but I have no problem using
ssh and apt to do the same thing. I am just wondering if I am missing
some major advantage of using up2date over apt.
thanks,
Vince
On Wed, 2003-10-01
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 21:16, Vince Scimeca wrote:
thanks Dave. I agree that the web interface to schedule updates for
remote systems is a nice feature of up2date, but I have no problem using
ssh and apt to do the same thing. I am just wondering if I am missing
some major advantage of using
I use to use Debian for a gw that I had at my house and one in the office. Apt is the
package manager of choice for that OS and they have a curses frontend called dselect.
And I loved it! Considerably easier than rpm's. You selected a package to install,
it took care of all the dependency's
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:42:24AM -0700, Thomas Frayne wrote:
Is there a way to use up2date on RH9 to install individual packages from
Rawhide? Is there another GUI package manager that can resolve
dependencies and install all needed packages?
No. I don't expect that Red Hat will ever
Ed,
Update the SSL certificate first:
https://rhn.redhat.com/help/ssl_cert.pxt
Then you'll be able to update everything else without a problem.
-Bob
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:40:46PM -0700, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
It's been awhile since I've used up2date on my system.
Unless you're
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:40:46PM -0700, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
It's been awhile since I've used up2date on my system.
Unless you're behind a very good firewall, you should be up2dating your
system regularly. I suggest you subscribe to the redhat-watch-list and
also to make sure
Ueoka, Kelly J. said:
Ed,
If you're receiving dependency errors when installing the manual way,
I've noticed that installing the new RPM's at once will usually cure
that. Try this
rpm -Uvh up2date-3.0.7.2-1.i386.rpm up2date-gnome-3.0.7-1 (Let me know
if that works for you.)
Kelly,
It was
Richard and everyone else,
Sorry about not deleting the previous list. Won't happen again.
Thanks,
Kelly J. Ueoka
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
It's been awhile since I've used up2date on my system. Today I tried,
and discovered that the SSL certificate I'd been given earlier had
expired. Going to Red Hat's website, I found that I can download a new
version of Up2date with the newer
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:40:46PM -0700, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
It's been awhile since I've used up2date on my system.
Unless you're behind a very good firewall, you should be up2dating your
system regularly. I suggest you subscribe to the redhat-watch-list and
also to make sure you get
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 18:11, Ed Wilts wrote:
The usual approach to resolving this is to download both up2date and
up2date-gnome and the do:
# rpm -Uvh up2date*.rpm
Thanks, that did it!
--
Slainte,
Richard S. Crawford
AIM: Buffalo2K / Y!: rscrawford / ICQ: 11640404
Howard Dean for America:
Romeo pravi:
Sorry i'm quite new to the list.
I'd like to know if is sure that is not a configuration error the
message I get when I try to do an up2date:
There was an SSL error: [('SSL routines',
'SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE', 'certificate verify failed')]
I red it was a redhat problem, but I
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 06:48, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Romeo pravi:
Sorry i'm quite new to the list.
I'd like to know if is sure that is not a configuration error the
message I get when I try to do an up2date:
There was an SSL error: [('SSL routines',
'SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE',
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 14:02, Robert Canary wrote:
Greetings,
I am getting an SSL-connect error whenever I try
to run up2date on one of my RHL 7.1 machines.
When I run the up2date it sits still for about
10sec. Then displays:
Error communicating with server. The message was:
Hey Robert
Check this page:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-267.html
Regards
Christoffer
Greetings,
I am getting an SSL-connect error whenever I try
to run up2date on one of my RHL 7.1 machines.
When I run the up2date it sits still for about
10sec. Then displays:
Error
Thank you very much, gentlemen :-)
Robert Canary wrote:
Greetings,
I am getting an SSL-connect error whenever I try to run up2date on one
of my RHL 7.1 machines.
When I run the up2date it sits still for about 10sec. Then displays:
Error communicating with server. The message was:
SSL_connect
You'll need to upgrade both up2date and up2date-gnome.
Shamelsss Advertisement
Issue-Tracker Support System
Project Page: http://sourcforge.net/projects/issue-tracker
Donations: http://donations.tuxmonkey.com/
/Shameless Advertisement
- Original Message -
From: Jay Moore [EMAIL
You must update both at the same time. Ie
Rpm -Fvh rpm1 rpm2 ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edwin Robertson
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: up2date upgrade failed
? is redhat
providing incorrect rpms? thanks for any help Jay Message: 26 From:
Otto Haliburton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: up2date upgrade failed
dependencies Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 06:08:51 -0500 Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] You must update both at the same time. Ie Rpm
-Fvh
Of Jay Moore
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 12:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: up2date upgrade failed dependencies
so i downloaded the up2date and up2date-gnome files from the redhat
network. when i do [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay81]# rpm -Fvh
up2date-3.1.23.2-1.i386.rpm up2date-gnome
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 16:18, Bjrn-Sverrre Nttum wrote:
Hallo!
Thanks for help yesterday, however I am experiencing another problem.
I am trying to install up2date 3.1.23.2 on my RedHat 9 server in order to
connect to up2date. The server is new installation.
I have tried several times,
Hi All,
I just registered for an account at RedHat so I can run up2date on my
Redhat 9.0 machine.
I wanted to see what programs I needed to update first before installing
so I did a:
up2date -l
to get the list of updates available. I noticed that my system is not up
to date so I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francis Lau
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: up2date
Hi All,
I just registered for an account at RedHat so I can run up2date on my
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: up2date
Hi All,
I just registered for an account at RedHat so I can run up2date on my
Redhat 9.0 machine.
I wanted to see what programs I needed to update first before installing
so I did a:
up2date -l
to get the list of updates available. I noticed
At 14:59 9/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I am not sure what you did but if you log into rhn then you can update
everything that is required. You should have gotten a red icon that
when you click on it. You will get all of the critical updates as well
as kernel updates for your system but you can do
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: up2date
At 14:59 9/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I am not sure what you did but if you log
Hi All,
I just registered for an account at RedHat so I can run up2date on my
Redhat 9.0 machine.
I wanted to see what programs I needed to update first before installing
so I did a:
up2date -l
to get the list of updates available. I noticed that my system is not up
to date so I
At 15:50 9/4/2003 -0400, you wrote:
to get the list of updates available. I noticed that my system is not up
to date so I downloaded the packages with a:
up2date -d
Why not a up2date -u which will download _and_ update the packages in one
step?
Can anyone tell me whether the up2date only
At 15:22 9/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I send what was sent!
That's the point, Otto. We all read the original post, and we all read the
answer. Then, when we get to your post, we have to read everything ALL OVER
AGAIN and there is no need for it... it wastes a lot of bandwidth and a lot
of
If you are trying to get ALL the updates for your system you should use the
-u along with your -d. -d only downloads what you specifically tell it to
download. So unless you aren't telling us what you typed, from what you
said here, you only typed 'up2date -d httpd'. If you just want the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: up2date
At 15:22 9/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I send what was sent!
That's
If you are trying to get ALL the updates for your system you should use the
-u along with your -d. -d only downloads what you specifically tell it to
download. So unless you aren't telling us what you typed, from what you
said here, you only typed 'up2date -d httpd'. If you just want the
At 15:48 9/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
If you are trying to get ALL the updates for your system you should use
the -u along with your -d.
You can use the -u alone without the -d.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 15:49 9/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
You are going to be surprised that I in fact agree with you but I've
been on this long enough to get criticized for both situation.
Yes, I do see your point. Besides, I'll admit that it bothers me more when
people do things out of ignorance or laziness; if you
At 05:33 PM 9/4/2003 -0600, you wrote:
At 15:48 9/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
If you are trying to get ALL the updates for your system you should use
the -u along with your -d.
You can use the -u alone without the -d.
True. But since he was using the -d, I was assuming that he just wanted to
Johnie Stafford wrote:
From rhn.redhat.com:
We are currently experiencing ssl problems with up2date and the RHN
applet. We are aware of the issue and working to restore service as soon
as possible. The RHN website is currently available, but actions
scheduled for systems will not take effect
Yes it has. You need to either download the new up2date
or the new certificate.
I don't have the links, but you could probably find them
Leonard
Has this been fixed yet?
I still have the problem, I just want to make sure it isn't a problem
with my setup.
Any idea when it will be
If this just started happening since Aug 28th, then it is
something that RedHat did. Have you downloaded the new up2date from redhat
as directed to on your http://rhn.redhat.com home page? They made some
changes to the up2date program and you should have been sent an email by
them
on 8/29.
-Jim Wartnick
-Original Message-
Message: 51
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 08:08:17 -0400
From: Hugh Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: up2date SSL error?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johnie Stafford wrote:
From rhn.redhat.com:
We are currently experiencing
Steve Buehler wrote:
If this just started happening since Aug 28th, then it is
something that RedHat did. Have you downloaded the new up2date from
redhat as directed to on your http://rhn.redhat.com home page? They
made some changes to the up2date program and you should have been
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:15:49 -0400, Charles Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
cb Michael Schwendt wrote:
Why not upgrade both packages at once?
cb Go for it. I was just being explicit.
But if you do both at once, its smart enough to deal with the
dependancy problem.
Johnie
--
redhat-list
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Edward Dekkers wrote:
What the?
There was an SSL error: [('SSL routines', 'SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE',
'certificate verify failed')]
A common cause of this error is the system time being incorrect. Verify
that the time on this system is correct.
snip...
Regards,
Not just you. I'm getting the same thing. Worked ok with the last
update of iptables and pam_smb, but now it doesn't.
Did you find anything?
Leonard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/28/03 20:28 PM
What the?
There was an SSL error: [('SSL routines', 'SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE',
'certificate verify
Gerry Doris wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Edward Dekkers wrote:
What the?
There was an SSL error: [('SSL routines', 'SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE',
'certificate verify failed')]
A common cause of this error is the system time being incorrect. Verify
that the time on this system is correct.
From rhn.redhat.com:
We are currently experiencing ssl problems with up2date and the RHN
applet. We are aware of the issue and working to restore service as soon
as possible. The RHN website is currently available, but actions
scheduled for systems will not take effect until service is restored.
They're working on that. Hopefully it won't take too long to get it
fixed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/28/03 23:33 PM
When I give the command 'up2date -u' I get the following error. This
happens on all 4 of my redhat 9 machines.
There was an SSL error: [('SSL routines',
Have you all seen this.
I got it from redhat about an hour ago.
The certificate used by up2date and rhn_register to communicate with the
Red Hat Network reached its end of life on August 28th 2003. Users
attempting to connect to Red Hat Network will see SSL connection or
certificate
Doug Finch wrote:
I am trying to reset my up2date and keep getting an error with the RPM:
up2date = 3.1.23.1 is needed by (installed) up2date-gnome-3.1.23.1-5
and when I try to run the gnome RPM I get this error:
up2date = 3.1.23.2 is needed by up2date-gnome-3.1.23.2-1
I am using the command that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:47:16 -0400, Charles Bronson wrote:
Doug Finch wrote:
I am trying to reset my up2date and keep getting an error with the RPM:
up2date = 3.1.23.1 is needed by (installed) up2date-gnome-3.1.23.1-5
and when I try to run the
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Why not upgrade both packages at once?
Go for it. I was just being explicit.
--
(¬_Some days you're the windshieldo)
//\Some days you're the bug.../\\
V_/_ _\_V
Charles Bronson
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:15:49 -0400, Charles Bronson wrote:
Why not upgrade both packages at once?
Go for it. I was just being explicit.
No, your example doesn't work without --nodeps and is not
equivalent to:
rpm -Uvh
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 09:01, Bjørn-Sverrre Nøttum wrote:
Hallo!
I have a problem with the up2date window. When i run up2date the window that
pops up is far to big for my screen. The hight is ok, but it is twice as
wide as the screen. I have tried to configure it, but not succeeded. This
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 20:19, Bob wrote:
I have a dialup connection and cannot complete a kernel update. Data
transfers never complete. They always stop (hang) somewhere above 3meg. I
have 450+ Meg available filesystem space. Does this sound more like a
dialup connection issue or disk space
David Hart wrote:
Have you tried FTP rather than Up2Date?
I like to use wget myself - if the connection breaks for some
reason, you can continue where it left off with wget -c
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 20:19, Bob wrote:
I have a dialup connection and cannot complete a kernel update. Data
transfers never complete. They always stop (hang) somewhere above 3meg. I
have 450+ Meg available filesystem space. Does this sound more like a
dialup connection issue or disk space
Richard Humphrey wrote:
If run up2date on sendmail on a production server, what are the chances
things will be meessed up? Anyone have any experience with up2date. I
have hesitated to run this, but i really need to update it.
Richard Humphrey
System Administrator
Multicam L.P.
(972)929-4070
Richard Humphrey wrote:
If run up2date on sendmail on a production server, what are the
chances things will be meessed up?
Slim, but real. This is a general point, rather than one about
sendmail or even RedHat, but (if I may say so) you should suck it
and see on a non-prod box first. If
, August 04, 2003 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Up2date
Richard Humphrey wrote:
If run up2date on sendmail on a production server, what are the
chances things will be meessed up?
Slim, but real. This is a general point, rather than one about
sendmail or even RedHat, but (if I may say
I have 8 production machines on 9 and 7.3 and always visit the RedHat
network website to do my updates manually.
I've update kernels through this method many times and had no problems.
I've only had one problem, it stopped xinetd on one 7.3 box a few times.
I spoke to a RedHat Chief Instructor
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 17:47, Darrell Burkey wrote:
I've installed numerous RH servers for community groups and I depend on
up2date to keep them up2date.
After a recent install of RH9, up2date failed to run and gave me a string of
errors which I sent off to RedHat Network feedback since I use
At 7/21/2003 08:00 +0200, you wrote:
So if I select packages to be installed on the website, the system checks
back with the site a n hour later to dl
And install the packages..
An hour, or a couple of hours. Not days, anyway.
On another note..I also tried to do the up2date -u and the kernel.src
I am trying to install the kermel-source rpm...
What would be the difference between the src and source rpms?
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Rodolfo J. Paiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 11:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Up2date problem
At 7/21/2003
At 7/21/2003 18:03 +0200, you wrote:
I am trying to install the kermel-source rpm...
What would be the difference between the src and source rpms?
In most cases, the .i386.rpm is the executable program and the .src.rpm has
the source code in case you wish to read/audit/modify it.
In the case of
At 7/21/2003 10:33 -0600, you wrote:
At 7/21/2003 18:03 +0200, you wrote:
In the case of the kernel-source package, I don't know exactly; but they
really are not the same thing.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should have said really are PROBABLY not the same thing.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 7/20/2003 04:16 +0200, you wrote:
I hve gone to the RH site and chosen packages to be installed...
And rh confirms this package is to be installed..
When I go to the machine, and run up2date -I, it does not install
-l lists the available updates.
-u actually performs the updates.
These
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Up2date problem
At 7/20/2003 04:16 +0200, you wrote:
I hve gone to the RH site and chosen packages to be installed...
And rh confirms this package is to be installed..
When I go to the machine, and run up2date -I, it does not install
-l lists the available updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:04:38 +0200, Go, Jeffrey wrote:
I have an issue with up2date
I hve gone to the RH site and chosen packages to be installed...
And rh confirms this package is to be installed..
When I go to the machine, and run up2date
I actually found the answer to this if anyone is interested. Not why it
was doing strange things but how to get the button back. I right click
on the tool bar and select add to pannel - utility - notification
area. After that I went to the redhat icon and selected system tools
- redhat network
On Thursday 17 July 2003 02:51 pm, Lee Flier wrote:
Robert Day's post about the latest Microsoft snafu brings up a question.
Now that Red Hat and other distros contain a lot of tools to make
installation, upgrades and other stuff easy for newbies/desktop users
(which is all to the good in
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 15:31, John Aldrich wrote:
Well, you can always use one of the other replacements for this, such as
apt4RPM, or YUM or something like that... Someone even wrote a nice GUI
interface to APT to make it easier -- it's called Synaptic. So, you're not
limited by the tools
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:51:37PM -0400, Lee Flier wrote:
Now that Red Hat and other distros contain a lot of tools to make
installation, upgrades and other stuff easy for newbies/desktop users
(which is all to the good in helping Linux replace M$), what is being
done to prevent
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 17:12, Ed Wilts wrote:
It's known as open source. Microsoft-like domination can not exist.
Of course not, in theory, and as long as the average Linux user remains
as tech savvy and eagle-eyed as most are now. In practice, as Microsoft
proved, a huge percentage of people
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 17:25, Go, Jeffrey wrote:
From a command line (as root) type up2date --configure (minus quotes);
this will open the Red Hat Network Configuration gui. Select the third
tab over Package Exceptions. You will see toward the top Package
Names to Skip. From here you can add
Doug Finch wrote:
On RedHat 9.0 the up2date icon is distorted on the toolbar. It appears
not as a circle but as a vertical line and it is hard to tell whether it
is red or blue. This has happened on two different machines that I have
running 9. One of the machines I removed the icon from the
Hello List.. I forgot to say that I hadn't rebooted the machine immediately after the update - some hours later (trying to tidy up) I had accidentally hit the power switch and it went down uncleanly, with the resulting boot to grub
Rebooting with a boot diskette gets me to the following:
at the grub enter kernel / TAB; this should give you a chioce of
available kernels to boot.
Then repeat the command with the correct kernel after /
then at the grub boot enter
This should boot you so that you can try to edit the grub file.
(I assume that you are using grub rather than lilo)
Thanks George... I typed in:
grub kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-17.7.x
then
grub boot
and it begins to load the kernel. Unfortunately it stops at:
EXT2-fs: unable to read superblock
isofs_read_super: bread failed, dev=09:02, iso_blknum=16, block=32
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 12:33, john-paul delaney wrote:
Thanks George... I typed in:
grub kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-17.7.x
then
grub boot
and it begins to load the kernel. Unfortunately it stops at:
EXT2-fs: unable to read superblock
isofs_read_super: bread
George...
I didn't get a choice of kernels on the
kernel /
prompt. Instead I was prompted with
partition/directory names such as usr tmp var boot
etc.
Therefore I thought I'd take a chance on a vmlinuz
file in boot.
Regarding the ext2fs error, on first googling it
appears to point to
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 13:53, john-paul delaney wrote:
George...
I didn't get a choice of kernels on the
kernel /
prompt. Instead I was prompted with
partition/directory names such as usr tmp var boot
etc.
well, I am out of my depth here:-) Maybe tommorrow will bring some more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 04:53:29 -0700 (PDT), john-paul delaney wrote:
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 12:33, john-paul delaney wrote:
Thanks George... I typed in:
grub kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-17.7.x
then
grub boot
Thanks a bunch Michael... looking at your reply sent me to:
info grub
realizing I had no idea how the boot loader works.
I tried the commands you suggested but didn't get it right - grub.conf wasn't found
even though a TAB listed it in the /boot/grub directory.
(The following are some
to everyone in this list who is always ready
to help..
And yes, I did remove one system so I can insert the other machine..:)
Thanks
jeff
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schwendt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Up2date issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 18:39:10 -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Go, Jeffrey wrote:
Hi
I ran up2date on my machine...and I wantd to dl and install the 2.4.20
kernel on my 7.3 machine..
But it keeps giving me the message Update has skipped the
-Original Message-
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Up2date issue?
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:25:50AM +0200, Go, Jeffrey wrote:
I ran up2date on my machine...and I wantd to dl and install the 2.4.20
kernel on my
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 17:12, Tom Wilson wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone know if there are any problems with using up2date and apt-get
together? Do they step on each others toes? Could you possibly use
up2date to keep up on the system and use apt to just install new
packages?
Not that I know. I use
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
up2date gives you updates very fast (mirrors update quite a few days after
the update is availably through up2date).
apt-get is great for getting aplications that you don't have installed!
up2date is great for getting
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 17:34, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
up2date gives you updates very fast (mirrors update quite a few days
after the update is availably through up2date).
apt-get is great for getting aplications that you don't have
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 13:34, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
up2date gives you updates very fast (mirrors update quite a few days after
the update is availably through up2date).
apt-get is great for getting aplications that you don't have
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 17:50, Cliff Wells wrote:
I don't know if apt-get gets you non-Red Hat apps though. Never
checked. Never needed to.
Yes it does. freshrpms.net and other apt repositories provide quite a
wealth of otherwise difficult to install packages.
Last time I filled a survey of
1 - 100 of 454 matches
Mail list logo
