to use
transaction(:requires_new = true).
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk
that the Rails process does not respond with the
file itself. Instead, Rails sets a special header which in turn is
picked up by Apache (or nginx, lighttpd) and interpreted in such a way
that it now serves the named file.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http
objects) are re-initialized again, too. Among those being the
variables that hold the database connection.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group
else might cause it to drop the transaction).
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t
to investigate the
reason. Usually, class caching is enabled there and connections are
retained across requests.
Another angle of attack is to set a breakpoint (or puts caller)
somewhere deep down in the database adapter to see when and from where
connections are established.
Michael
--
Michael
interested in the details, read the code in gem
dir/activerecord-3.0.0/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
in a gemspec.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group
package for that.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
who introduced this
extension of the original i386/IA-32 architecture.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64 . And have look at the output of
uname -a.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you
or nginx are much faster at serving static files than Rails
proper would be.
I take it, the usual way to add assets from a gem is to include a
generator that copies (or links) these assets to the application's
public directory.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http
, even though they are encoded as %2F.
I'd prefer if I didn't have to read through all the ActionPack and Rack
routing code to understand what's happening and find a remedy. It must
be possible to do this cleanly.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de
On Tuesday 14 September 2010, Jeremy Kemper wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Michael Schuerig
mich...@schuerig.de wrote:
[...]
There is nothing in the app's log. The problem appears to be caused
by the / in the :url parameter, even though they are encoded as
%2F.
I'd prefer
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
(or flabberghastly,
depending on how you look at it).
Anyway, I think(!) you get what you want, if you simply write
with_locale(:en) {
Page.find_by_name('Welcome')
}
For more details, have a look at the tests that come with globalize3.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http
. Is there another solution that doesn't
involve overwriting and makes resources generate the size routes? One
important constraint is that I need the :size option on #image_path; it
would not help to have additional routes with different names.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group
.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group
purposes, there probably isn't a noticeable speed
difference between a 2.4GHz dual core and a quad core of the same
generation; 4GB RAM is the minimum; see if you can try out how an SSD
affects speed (and tell us about your experience).
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http
On Tuesday 07 September 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
I am still considering a better solution for your problem, though
I'll admit that the spirit in which my attempts have so far been
received is not exactly encouraging me to spend much more time on
the issue
-- and ignorant. You don't have to answer
every question in this mailing list single-handedly.
Anyway, I'm still looking for a way to express the existing, working SQL
solutions (sub-select for the latest version corresponding to an
article) in elegant ActiveRecord code.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
On Saturday 04 September 2010, Colin Law wrote:
On 4 September 2010 09:14, Michael Schuerig mich...@schuerig.de
wrote:
On Friday 03 September 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Well, you learn something new every day! I found the Ambiguous
Groups article
On Friday 03 September 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
On Friday 03 September 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
On further reflection, I don't know why you would need an outer
join unless not every Article has a Version associated. Is that
the case?
I need
: correlated subqueries?
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
On Friday 03 September 2010, Michael Pavling wrote:
On 2 September 2010 22:49, Michael Schuerig mich...@schuerig.de
wrote:
Firstly, I've asked a similar question before[*]. I didn't get any
answers back then, maybe now I have better luck
It's hard to answer your post, as your only
On Friday 03 September 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
Firstly, I've asked a similar question before[*]. I didn't get any
answers back then, maybe now I have better luck
Let's say I have models like this
class Article ActiveRecord::Base
On Friday 03 September 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
I had a couple more ideas just after I posted.
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
[...]
:joins with a symbol does an inner join.
So use an SQL fragment if you need an outer join (which, on
reflection, I
. Their default configurations are meant to work, but are
in no ways optimized for what you might be doing with your databases.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
On Wednesday 01 September 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
I'm looking for an extension (gem, plugin, whatever) that inserts
comments like
!-- begin partial app/views/things/_thing.html.erb --%
...
!-- end partial app/views/things/_thing.html.erb
initialized
constant DEFAULT_OPTIONS
Is there anything I can do about this warning?
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group
loadable',
:before = action_controller.set_configs do |app|
paths.app.helpers.each do |path|
app.paths.app.helpers path
end
end
and unfortunately, that in some way appears to cause the warning.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael
On Wednesday 25 August 2010, Bill Walton wrote:
Sorry to jump in mid-stream here, but
On Aug 25, 12:29 am, Michael Schuerig mich...@schuerig.de wrote:
Last week! I just found it too big and bloated for Rails needs
Make sure you're using the Ruby-only version of NB unless you really
On Wednesday 25 August 2010, Bill Walton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Michael Schuerig
mich...@schuerig.de wrote:
My ~/.netbeans/6.9 directory has grown to an amazing 856MB, largely
consisting of downloaded updates, I reckon.
Ouch. OTOH, that's like $0.10 worth of storage now
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
, particularly
RadRails/Studio for Rails 3, had still many problems of their own, last
time I looked.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group
sending the file.
I'm using apache 2.2 and mod_xsendfile 0.9.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email
=v1.1.42 deploy
Are there reasons not to do this or not to do it this way? I don't think
there is a security problem of exposing to many details about the app as
it is only for internal use.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received
On Tuesday 10 August 2010, Parker Selbert wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
I'd like to be able to see from generated pages which version of
the app has generated it. As we're using git and always deploy a
specific tag, having that tag in the HTML head as a meta tag would
be suitable
On Tuesday 10 August 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
[...]
I didn't explain why I want this version number to begin with. I
don't need the version anywhere in the app. The whole point is to
identify the version of the app that has generated a page. So, if
I get
On Tuesday 10 August 2010, Parker Selbert wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
I don't see where security would be an issue here, but reusability
may be. A more generic VERSION file that can be loaded and read
from would be available anywhere in your application, and could be
simpler
On Tuesday 10 August 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
On Tuesday 10 August 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Then, instead of a meta tag, why not just put it in a hidden (or
smallish) div in the HTML?
Why? I don't see what I would gain.
If it's not hidden
On Tuesday 10 August 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
[...]
Trust me, I'm not overwriting anything. Yes, I wrote so originally,
but that was only for easier explanation. When I had to go into
the details, I clarified that I'm not overwriting, but rather
On Tuesday 10 August 2010, Parker Selbert wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
Capistrano already writes a REVISION file containing the commit
sha1. Let's assume there's a TAG file, too. Then an initializer
like this would do the job
if Rails.env.production?
version = File.read('TAG
to the core implementation, but mostly to the
packaging (plugin, engine) and integration with ActionView. The server
itself doesn't depend on Rails, AFAICT, so it wouldn't be affected by
version changes.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael
On Monday 26 July 2010, Ryan Bigg wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010, Ryan Bigg wrote:
As for the people who aren't good for this community, I so far see
two of them in this entire thread and let me tell you: they aren't
the people who are whining that Rails 3 isn't out
they should leave?
To get an idea of the impact that certain people leaving would have on
the community, I suggest writing a script to count the number of
contributions to the mailing list that the people involved in this
thread have made over the years.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich
. Is there a *clean* way to make
render_to_string do what I want?
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email
On Saturday 03 July 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
My skeletal renderer looks like this
ActionController.add_renderer :pdf do |template, options|
html = render_to_string(template, options)
...
end
The trouble here
/rdebug-ide:87
/var/lib/gems/1.8/bin/rdebug-ide:19:in `load'
/var/lib/gems/1.8/bin/rdebug-ide:19
-e:3:in `load'
-e:3
Uncaught exception: uninitialized constant Debugger::CommandProcessor
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael
= Article.with_latest_version
article[i].version
is intended to be the latest version. Works nicely in 2.3.8, but in
3.beta4 it breaks down somewhere when ARel somewhere deep down doesn't
remember anymore that there is a :version association.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http
with the restul_auth plugin btw.
Have you had a look at authlogic for comparison?
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email
on all the
validates_something methods.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t
. Eclipse/Aptana and Textmate do this
exceptionally well, I haven't found this functionality in a similarly
easy and quick way in Emacs. It might be hidden somewhere, please point
it out in case I just didn't find it.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http
On Friday 12 March 2010, Greg Donald wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Michael Schuerig
mich...@schuerig.de wrote:
http://static.destiney.com/emacs_screen_shot.jpg
There's one feature I've been missing in Emacs:
There are only missing features until you add them.
http
On Tuesday 02 February 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
On Monday 01 February 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
strings.
Let's just leave it at that and acknowledge that our views differ.
I really would rather not leave it there. If I'm doing things the
wrong
On Monday 01 February 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
If you only include specific helper modules, you can have
multiple methods with the same name, but different
implementations. This can be useful in order
On Monday 01 February 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
[...]
What's the point of helper polymorphism? I'm having trouble
coming up with a good use case for it.
format_value, cancel_link are just two examples where generic names
are perfectly understandable
that our views differ.
If you don't already know them for a long time, you might enjoy Allen
Holub's old JavaWorld articles on UI construction.
http://holub.com/publications/articles/index.html#javaworld
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
[...]
Helpers are procedural by nature. helper :all drives out the last
bit of polymorphism there was.
Why do you say that? I don't understand, except to the extent that
Rails views are sort of procedural
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
[...]
Helpers are procedural by nature. helper :all drives out the
last bit of polymorphism there was.
Why do you say
making this suggestion every once in a while and usually the
reaction is not particularly heartfelt. Anyway, don't take this
personally, see it as an invitation, not an exhortation.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael
of the client
machine. Use it to render various versions of your page.
Here's how I've done a thing like that in the past
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/blog/index.php/2007/02/22/size-dependent-
layout/
HTH,
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael
On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Nicholas Wieland wrote:
Il giorno 03/ago/09, alle ore 20:10, Michael Schuerig ha scritto:
On Monday 03 August 2009, Nicholas Wieland wrote:
Hi *, I'm writing an API for my application, but I can't figure
out how to behave with the json frontend, where I need
of problems ?
In case you decide that JSON views are what you want, have a look at a
(trivial) template handler I wrote to help with just that
http://github.com/mschuerig/ruby_template_handler
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael
(shipping_address_id_was) if shipping_address_id_was
end
# same for billing_address; better extract the common code
end
end
The code probably won't work as is, but it might get you started. Also,
have a look at the :autosave option for belongs_to.
HTH,
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich
the after_save
callback is invoked? That was my concern when I suggested using a
before_save callback in a parallel post.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
and and add the appropriate classes to your style rules.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group
, but for the style-switching,
you can make them completely static, i.e., they can be served by the web
server without any processing by Rails.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Wednesday 15 July 2009, Will Grundler wrote:
Does anyone, by chance, know how to obtain a list of all the defined
activerecord validations at runtime?
http://rubyforge.org/projects/valirefl/
http://github.com/mschuerig/validation_reflection/tree/master
HTH,
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
/ruby-flv-pseudostreaming-
implemented-using-sinatra-and-rack-evil-useful-for-rails-too/
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
a lot of code
out there, plugins specifically, to tacitly assume that ids are plain
numbers or can converted to numbers.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
-controller-
presenter.html
http://blog.jayfields.com/2007/01/another-rails-presenter-example.html
http://blog.jayfields.com/2007/02/rails-presenters-additional-layer.html
http://blog.jayfields.com/2007/03/rails-presenter-pattern.html
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http
.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails
On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Älphä Blüë wrote:
Michael Schuerig wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Fernando Perez wrote:
instead of 100 different places.
That would be a job for either helper methods or partials.
From my understanding, helpers were designed for markup with views.
Well
just wastes performance.
add_index :keywords, :keyword, :unique = true
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
-for-violated-database-constraints
Please state your opinion and/or support, for otherwise the issue might
be delayed interminably.
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
in the controller.
That was the point of the controller; it gave a central place to put
business logic.
That sounds more like Jacobson's Entity-Boundary-Control. Is there a
chance you're thinking of that?
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael
to do. If you want to write your own adapter
that's at least as deep as you'll have to dive into the code that's
already there.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
to find what you need if you start studying it closely
starting from its ActiveRecord integration. I don't think you will be
able to achieve your goal without understanding details of how Thinking
Sphinx works, as you're trying to stretch it beyond its intended use.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
, with Mongrel and similarly load-balanced servers this works. But
how about Passenger?
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
.) + load balancer setup, each server
process has its own port and presumably the relevant information is
accessible from the deployment specification. I have no idea how things
are with passenger.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael
.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk
On Tuesday 19 May 2009, Frederick Cheung wrote:
On May 19, 11:24 am, Michael Schuerig mich...@schuerig.de wrote:
Rails gives you optimistic locking automatically for tables that
have the requisite timestamp columns (updated_at). Pessimistic
locking you have to do explicitly. As a guess
Data Modeling Essentials
Morgan Kaufman 2004
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post
://pgfoundry.org/projects/mysql2pgsql/
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send
of trying to build a graph of objects and save
them with a single object.save.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
of ingredient_nutrients.
I think in order to get better help you ought to post more of your code
and the exact exception messages you get.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Friday 15 May 2009, Branko Vukelic wrote:
On May 15, 9:20 pm, Michael Schuerig mich...@schuerig.de wrote:
doesn't help, because you're not *creating* ingredients with
associated ingredient_nutrients. Rather, you're associating
existing ingredients and nutrients with the help
will be found automatically.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email
. Therefore I put this method together
myself and would be very grateful if anyone could point out if there
are any massive security exploits that I have overlooked.
Passing arbitrary, user-provided strings to eval or class_eval *is* a
huge security hole.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich
concatenates strings. There's no support for expressing, on the
one hand, that a specific join is needed (without duplicating it), and
on the other, that you want another, independent join.
Michael
On May 11, 7:34 pm, Michael Schuerig mich...@schuerig.de wrote:
I have a model layer containing Movie
hook up a model.
If you go that way, have a look at
http://github.com/aeden/rails_sql_views
http://github.com/mschuerig/rails_sql_views
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
])
I'm not sure this is possible with ActiveRecord as it is, but I'm
looking forward to suggestions.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk
. Did you have a look at existing text mining tools/frameworks
in Ruby as well as other languages?
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
[2] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/plpgsql-control-
structures.html#PLPGSQL-ERROR-TRAPPING
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
:inventory_account_type
named_scope :of_type, lambda { |type|
:joins = :inventory_account_type,
:conditions = { :inventory_account_types = { :name = type } }
}
end
And use it as
InventoryAccount.of_type(:income).find(...)
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:mich...@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
