On 13-May-09, at 10:53 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
- C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the input, and triggers
automatic completion:
As far as I'm concerned, tabs in input are always wrong. Python even
has an error
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I think what we should do is merge as much of SPD into Sage as
possible to lessen the maintainance burden. One thing I could see here
is to define SAGE_EXECUTABLE and you would just set it to spd in your
As is Sage doesn't even build if you do a straight up framework build.
This can and will be fixed, but if I have learned one thing about
FrameWorks on OSX is to avoid them whenever possible, i.e that
absolute crap issue with the IOKit and libpng has scared me for
life ;)
What are the
On May 14, 12:42 am, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
As is Sage doesn't even build if you do a straight up framework build.
This can and will be fixed, but if I have learned one thing about
FrameWorks on OSX is to avoid them whenever possible, i.e that
absolute crap issue
The bug is almost trivial. The code
verts = data.keys()
for u in data:
verts.union([v for v in data[u] if v not in verts])
is slowing down because in python searching in lists is slow. If we
use verts = set(data.keys()) the code speeds up tremendously.
sage: D={}
sage: for i in
On May 14, 1:08 am, Rado rki...@gmail.com wrote:
The bug is almost trivial. The code
verts = data.keys()
for u in data:
verts.union([v for v in data[u] if v not in verts])
is slowing down because in python searching in lists is slow. If we
use verts = set(data.keys()) the code
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:56:53PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-May-09, at 10:53 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:40:46PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
- C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the input, and triggers
automatic completion:
As far as I'm
On May 14, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Rado wrote:
Last question if I used ./sage -clone myvrr and made the changes in
myver, how do I tell sage to run the tests there (if this even makes
sense?)
You can do
./sage -t devel/sage-myvrr/sage/graphs/... # or -tp 10
- Robert
Rado
On May 14, 3:13
On May 14, 1:32 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Rado wrote:
Last question if I used ./sage -clone myvrr and made the changes in
myver, how do I tell sage to run the tests there (if this even makes
sense?)
You can do
./sage -t
alright, all tests passed. I will post the patch here tomorrow (its
only two lines). Thanks for the explanations, now I understand what's
the symlink for :)
Rado
On May 14, 3:39 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On May 14, 1:32 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
Ok, *still* no alpha (I caught up with sleep yesterday-ish), but here
we go:
* 75% coverage: Still at 74.4%, but pynac will get us over 75%.
* pynac: Number of failing doctests keesp decreasing - I am not
keeping track of this, so somebody else has to update on this
* 64 bit OSX: does now
On May 14, 4:31 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, *still* no alpha (I caught up with sleep yesterday-ish), but here
we go:
* 75% coverage: Still at 74.4%, but pynac will get us over 75%.
* pynac: Number of failing doctests keesp decreasing - I am not
keeping track of
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:45 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Your comment about the sum function suggests to me that something
similar might be behind the weird thing I reported yesterday.
Yeah, we ought to suggest to the pari people to rename such generic
function. Even with
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:43 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
...
Ok, checking the wiki at http://wiki.sagemath.org/symbolics/pynac_todo/push
three hours ago we were at
== Doctest status: May 14 ==
As of 1:03am, we have 66 failures in 18 files.
...
sage -t
2009/5/14 Michael Abshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:45 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Your comment about the sum function suggests to me that something
similar might be behind the weird thing I reported yesterday.
Yeah, we ought to suggest to the
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:55 AM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Will 4.0.a0 be released sometime today? (I'm leaving early tomorrow morning
for SD15 and may not get internet access quickly when I arrive.)
Well, my main goal is to get ecl into 4.0.a0. Since the status meeting
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:57 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/14 Michael Abshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:45 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Your comment about the sum function suggests to me that something
similar might be
Rado wrote:
alright, all tests passed. I will post the patch here tomorrow (its
only two lines). Thanks for the explanations, now I understand what's
the symlink for :)
and thanks for catching this and tracking down the fix!
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
a bit of back and forth on the numpy list last night...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Glenn Tarbox, PhD gl...@tarbox.org
Date: Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy slices limited to 32 bit values?
To: Discussion of Numerical Python
Your comment about the sum function suggests to me that something
similar might be behind the weird thing I reported yesterday.
Yep, this is exactly the cause. If you look at rational.pyx, it
includes libs/pari/decl.pxi, which contains a declaration for Pari's
sum function. This then takes
On May 14, 9:46 am, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I don't think they would rename sum to please us!
And I really really don't think they should. After all, the issue is
that python and pari both use the same name for something -- we might
as well be asking python to
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Bill Page wrote:
Ok thanks. I recall the discussion and I can indeed write:
sage: f=lambda x:RR(x).nth_root(3)
sage: f(-2.0)
-1.25992104989487
but I think I'll let my earlier comment stand:
I think there should be a more obvious way.
I'm currently building/doctesting with (1) in place, and I'll report
back soon. gen.pyx passes all tests, so I suspect we're probably safe.
Doctesting is done, and no troubles -- so I've posted a patch here:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6039
-cc
On 2009/5/7 Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
The director of RD at Maple is Juergen Gerhard.
A small correction: unless my information is out of date, as far as am I
aware the person in charge of R+D at Maplesoft is still Laurent Bernardin,
the vice-president of R+D. However, Juergen
Hi,
Anybody seen this or participated: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom
This looks like a good idea to organize a Sage Classroom equivalent.
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
I like Craig's solution (but have not yet tested his patch). Thanks, Craig!
John
2009/5/14 Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com:
I'm currently building/doctesting with (1) in place, and I'll report
back soon. gen.pyx passes all tests, so I suspect we're probably safe.
Doctesting is done, and
Hello folks,
most 3.4.2 binaries are up on sagemath.org and being mirrored out.
From the usual suspects some are still missing, i.e.
* Fedora Core 10 32 bit
* Atom
* RHEL 5.2/SLES 10 Itanium
* OSX 10.4 Intel
Most of the missing binaries will show up in the next 24 hours. We
also have some
Sorry for the slow reply. sage-devel's Reply-To munging drops
everyone from the Cc: on replies and I'm normally not directly
subscribed to the list.
(because of this kind of problem, I do think that everyone should run
their high-traffic mailing lists without any sort of reply-to munging,
like
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
Sorry for the slow reply. sage-devel's Reply-To munging drops
everyone from the Cc: on replies and I'm normally not directly
subscribed to the list.
(because of this kind of problem, I do think that everyone should run
On 05/13/09 22:16, Brian Granger wrote:
I just pinged the pythonmac-sig group about why and when a framework
build is actually needed. A while back I created an spkg for qt/pyqt
and I remember that I needed to do a framework build to get it to
work. My recollection is that if you want
On May 14, 10:50 am, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi Tim,
Sorry for the slow reply. sage-devel's Reply-To munging drops
everyone from the Cc: on replies and I'm normally not directly
subscribed to the list.
I tend to use Google groups directly and not bother with the email
On 05/10/09 23:18, mabshoff wrote:
Well, it doesn't matter for builds from source too much, the real
problem is when a user runs -upgrade for Sage.
Sorry for being dense. You mean when the user runs -upgrade with a
non-framework install? Suppose a user has a fresh install, would the
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Stephen Forrest
stephen.forr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2009/5/7 Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
The director of RD at Maple is Juergen Gerhard.
A small correction: unless my information is out of date, as far as am I
aware the person in charge of R+D at
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Stephen Forrest
stephen.forr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2009/5/7 Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
The director of RD at Maple is Juergen Gerhard.
A small correction: unless my information is out of date, as far as am I
aware the person in charge of R+D at
2009/5/14 William Stein wst...@gmail.com
Just out of curiosity, do you think there is any chance that Maplesoft
would provide any funding or help of any kind to an open source
project whose mission statement is to to Provide a viable free open
source alternative to Maple?
Obviously, I am
* Solaris: I finally *fixed* the symmetrica issues and all it took
was 6 hours of staring at disgusting code.
Congratulations!
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www:
On May 14, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
I'm currently building/doctesting with (1) in place, and I'll report
back soon. gen.pyx passes all tests, so I suspect we're probably
safe.
Doctesting is done, and no troubles -- so I've posted a patch here:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 08:34:56PM +0100, Martin Albrecht wrote:
* Solaris: I finally *fixed* the symmetrica issues and all it took
was 6 hours of staring at disgusting code.
Congratulations!
And thanks so much for the investment you did into this.
I very much hope Alex will get your
On May 8, 2009, at 2:55 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 12:55:57AM -0700, davidloeffler wrote:
Can I use this opportunity to request some reviews for modular forms
patches?
Let me do the same for the prerequisite patches for the category
framework. They are all in
This is the right fix. Looks good--are you sure we don't use pari's
sum anywhere else?
Well, I'm not 100% sure ... but given that the Python and pari ones
accept *different* numbers of arguments, I suspect we're okay. I tried
using search_src to find cases with two or more commas in a call to
On May 14, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Craig Citro wrote:
This is the right fix. Looks good--are you sure we don't use pari's
sum anywhere else?
Well, I'm not 100% sure ... but given that the Python and pari ones
accept *different* numbers of arguments, I suspect we're okay. I tried
using
I've taken a look at most of these. I'll send Nicolas comments off list
(though I probably won't get to that until later tonight). But I agree with
Robert that a global picture wiki page would be good.
David
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
Hi Robert!
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:25:35PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
...
I am looking forward to talking to you next week about all this
stuff, but I was thinking it would be useful to have a wiki page
summarizing the big picture with the links to relevant tickets, or
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
I'm currently building/doctesting with (1) in place, and I'll report
back soon. gen.pyx passes all tests, so I suspect we're probably
safe.
Doctesting is
On May 14, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
I'm currently building/doctesting with (1) in place, and I'll
report
back soon. gen.pyx passes all
On May 14, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Hi Robert!
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:25:35PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
...
I am looking forward to talking to you next week about all this
stuff, but I was thinking it would be useful to have a wiki page
summarizing the big
-- Forwarded message --
From: Goran S. Ivanovic gsivano...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:46 PM
Subject: Compiled Sage on Slackware 12.2
To: wst...@gmail.com
Hello Dr. Stein,
Just to let you know that I compiled SAGE on my Slack 12.2. I
installed it temporarily to see
here is the patch as promised. I don't have a trac account and it
seems closed, so someone needs to paste it there.
http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~rkirov2/sage/11804.patch
Rado
On May 14, 7:12 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Rado wrote:
alright, all tests passed. I will post
On May 14, 8:01 pm, Rado rki...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rado,
here is the patch as promised. I don't have a trac account and it
seems closed, so someone needs to paste it there.
Follow http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracGuidelines and I will take care of
your account.
On May 14, 1:18 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 08:34:56PM +0100, Martin Albrecht wrote:
Hi,
* Solaris: I finally *fixed* the symmetrica issues and all it took
was 6 hours of staring at disgusting code.
Congratulations!
Thanks.
And
50 matches
Mail list logo
