Mathematically speaking, do we really want to accept:
HighestWeightCrystal(dominant_weights = (...))?
That is, do we want to consider a disconnected crystal as a highest
weight crystal, if all its connected components are highest weight?
I am not so sure. Notes:
- This feature is not
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 01:01:44PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Should
direct_sum_of_crystals
be a method similar to
TensorProductOfCrystals?
Then the input would be a list of crystals (B_1,...,B_n) whose direct sum one
takes.
I suppose the elements would then be stored as tuple
Hi Franco,
I will most likely come (and Jason Bandlow as well as I learned this morning).
Thank you for organizing!
Anne
Franco Saliola wrote:
Hello everyone,
Great news! The Fields Institute (Toronto, Canda) has agreed to host a
Sage Days event! The event will take place May 3-7, 2010. So
Should
direct_sum_of_crystals
be a method similar to
TensorProductOfCrystals?
Then the input would be a list of crystals (B_1,...,B_n) whose direct sum one
takes.
I suppose the elements would then be stored as tuple
tuple(b,i)
where b \in B_i.
Yes. And you can inherit from
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 02:27:50PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Should direct_sum_of_crystals be a method similar to
TensorProductOfCrystals?
Then the input would be a list of crystals (B_1,...,B_n) whose direct sum
one takes.
I suppose the elements would then be stored as tuple
On Jan 29, 4:29 pm, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote:
Dear Dan,
Were you able to look at #7978? It is ready for review.
I checked that the patch trac_7978_crystal_cleanup-as.2.patch
passes sage --testall.
I am not finished looking at the patch.
I have one comment, which is not
Dear Dan,
I checked that the patch trac_7978_crystal_cleanup-as.2.patch
passes sage --testall.
I am not finished looking at the patch.
I have one comment, which is not really about the patch, but about
affine.py. This is that I think promotion should be explained
a bit more. I think there
Hi Niolcas,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 01:01:44PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Should
direct_sum_of_crystals
be a method similar to
TensorProductOfCrystals?
Then the input would be a list of crystals (B_1,...,B_n) whose direct sum one
takes.
I suppose the elements would then be stored as tuple
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Starting to build Sage, then finding the python builds, but finds to find
the hashlib module is a bit irritating. There is is a specific test for this
in spkg-install.
The issue reported on sage-support makes me think we should insist that updates
are performed with the same version of gcc as that which was used to build gcc
in the first placed. Basically, two people have found
1) Install Sage with older gcc.
2) Install the latest gcc 4.4.3
3) Try to update
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
The issue reported on sage-support makes me think we should insist that
updates are performed with the same version of gcc as that which was
used to build gcc in the first placed.
I mean update Sage with the same version of gcc - not update gcc with the same
version!
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I was not actually suggesting shipping OpenSSL, as I knew there were
license implications.
But I think you would have to agree it is pretty annoying for someone to
download Sage, start a build, then the build fail due to lack of OpenSSL.
I do not believe this issue
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
3) Change Sage so that the hashlib module of python is not essential for
a functioning Sage. That is I suspect the easiest option. I don't claim
to understand how Sage builds fully, but I would have thought crypto
support was not a requirement.
What I mean is, that a
On Jan 31, 2010, at 2:15 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I was not actually suggesting shipping OpenSSL, as I knew there
were license implications.
But I think you would have to agree it is pretty annoying for
someone to download Sage, start a build, then the build fail
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:47:00 +, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
The issue reported on sage-support makes me think we should insist that
updates
are performed with the same version of gcc as that which was used to build
gcc
in the first placed. Basically, two people
http://wiki.sagemath.org/SupportedPlatforms
is very out of date. This is no criticism o the web master - I know only too
well it is next to impossible to keep a web site up to date.
Here are the points.
1) Solaris 9 on Sparc 32 bit (ongoing, getting close, mabshoff is working on
this)
On Jan 31, 2010, at 2:21 AM, David Joyner wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:17 PM, David Joyner wrote:
...
http://math.byu.edu/~gvol/files/fluidium_app-0.1.spkg
This doesn't work either (imac, 10.6.2).
Hmm. It
Alex Ghitza wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:47:00 +, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
The issue reported on sage-support makes me think we should insist that updates
are performed with the same version of gcc as that which was used to build gcc
in the first placed. Basically,
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 31, 2010, at 2:15 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I was not actually suggesting shipping OpenSSL, as I knew there were
license implications.
But I think you would have to agree it is pretty annoying for someone
to download Sage, start a
The only place I know it's used is to serve up secure notebooks, but I
bet its used elsewhere too. I see another option
IF that is all, then that hardly seems a major loss of functionality. I bet
most people don't use the secure notebooks anyway. I can see they have
advantages though,
Martin Albrecht wrote:
The only place I know it's used is to serve up secure notebooks, but I
bet its used elsewhere too. I see another option
IF that is all, then that hardly seems a major loss of functionality. I bet
most people don't use the secure notebooks anyway. I can see they have
Hi!
When working on some trac tickets, I found that the preview button
does not work.
Trac claimed that it was an invalid operation. Afterwards, when
returning to the trac ticket, assign to SimonKing was ticked, while
it should have been leaving needs_review.
Are others experiencing similar
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
[snipped]
Fair enough. I mis understood this. But I still think we should not let
someone upgrade Sage with a version different to what they used to build
it.
-1
I've a system wide install of sage upgraded 86 times:
[r...@paix installed]# ls sage-*
sage-1.5.1.2
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Personally, I do not believe it is legal to ship OpenSSL and for Sage to
remain GPL, unless you could get the python developers agree to add an
clause that permits linking against OpenSSL.
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 at 10:15AM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
3) Change Sage so that the hashlib module of python is not essential
for a functioning Sage. That is I suspect the easiest option. I
don't claim to understand how Sage builds fully, but I would have
thought crypto support was not a
I don't see any point listing HP-UX. That platform died in 2004. I saw
its grave.
Here is one of the many obituaries:
http://www.chillingeffects.org/responses/notice.cgi?NoticeID=1460
I see you suggested Sage switch to GMP for an HP-UX port. Well, not
only will MPIR not be supporting HP-UX, but
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't see any point listing HP-UX. That platform died in 2004. I saw
its grave.
Here is one of the many obituaries:
http://www.chillingeffects.org/responses/notice.cgi?NoticeID=1460
I see you suggested Sage
I've made a page of Architectures/Compilers/OSes that MPIR should
recognise, along with a *proposed* categorisation according to how
much attention the MPIR developers do/should pay to each.
I'm posting this to the mpir-devel and sage-devel lists for comment,
as this is just as relevant for the
I've posted a list of arches/compilers/OSes that MPIR currently does/
perhaps should support, in another thread. That should answer the
question, I think.
On Jan 31, 3:28 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I
Hmm, the link could help:
http://mpir.org/supported.html
It's not on the main MPIR webpage yet, as this is a proposal, which
will need approval of the MPIR devels, after a period of discussion.
Bill.
On Jan 31, 5:17 pm, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've made a page of
OK, I did some reading and I now see the point of the question.
At this point I don't see any problem with Linux on Itanium 2. For
example the gcc build farm contains an Itanium 2 (though no longer an
Itanium), and gcc itself support Itanium 2, as does the assembler
(obviously).
Are there any
The following example
sage: p = 17
sage: F = GF(p)
sage: P2.X,Y,Z = ProjectiveSpace(F,2)
sage: C = Curve(X^2+Y^2-Z^2)
sage: len(C.rational_points())
18
sage: C.rational_points(algorithm='bn')
---
RuntimeError
Ah!
http://www.linux.com/news/enterprise/biz-enterprise/266916-red-hat-pulls-plug-on-itanium-with-rhel-6
That leaves debian, which still supports it officially, unofficial
support on Ubuntu and support for ia32 on SUSE.
But that leads me to question the future of ia64 itself. I don't
personally
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 08:58:28PM +, John Cremona wrote:
Some of those might have come from me since I use emacs and I edited
some combinat docstrings recently (they were giveing errors when
building the docs).
Those we just fixed were from someone else :-)
I would like to have emacs
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:09:24AM -0800, Nick Alexander wrote:
Why don't you update the sage-mode wiki ...
Upon googling for the wiki, the first hit was:
http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Sage_Mode
Sage Mode is the result of using natural energy along with a
ninja's normal
Jaap Spies wrote:
Hi c++ experts,
My C++ is a little bit rusty, so I'll ask here.
Building matplotlib, pynac, scipy and scipysandbox fail in the end with
/usr/local/gcc-4.4.2/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.4.2/../../../../include/c++/4.4.2/bits/char_traits.h:
In static member function ‘static
Hi Jaap,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
Ok, I seem to be on the ban list of everybody?
Certainly not. Not on mine.
Please help.
I'm very new with OpenSolaris. But is there an OpenSolaris machine
somewhere I could use to help?
--
Regards
Minh Van
Hello All
Here is a link to a prototype sage desktop app for the Mac.
http://numerator.sourceforge.net/SageApp.dmg
Its 100% native, Cocoa model / view application. On startup, it creates a
background process with the sage notebook server, and users can open as many
windows as they want to it.
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi Jaap,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Jaap Spiesj.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
Ok, I seem to be on the ban list of everybody?
Certainly not. Not on mine.
Thanks!
Please help.
I'm very new with OpenSolaris. But is there an OpenSolaris machine
somewhere I could
Then why do you bother posting things that look like requests for
help?
In the hope that someone will fix the source, rather than offer new
patches? It's not as though it hasn't been reported yet, or discussed
yet, and several new releases have gone by without resolution.
Meanwhile I'll get
Dear Javier,
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 02:01:07PM -0800, javier wrote:
The implementation of the conjugacy classes is now ticket #7886:
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/7886
I went through your patch, and am definitely +1 on the overall design
and user interface! Here are some
On 01-31-2010, at 4:29 PM, Andy Somogyi wrote:
Hello All
Here is a link to a prototype sage desktop app for the Mac.
http://numerator.sourceforge.net/SageApp.dmg
Its 100% native, Cocoa model / view application. On startup, it creates a
background process with the sage notebook
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that Sage 4.3.0.1.alpha1 [1] successfully builds
on t2.math. Due to an unfortunate typo, the version number should be
Sage 4.3.0.2.alpha1 since it's based on Sage 4.3.0.1 [2]. This alpha
release is based on Sage 4.3.0.1.alpha0 and merged the following
tickets:
Sorry for the spam; but I thought I'd share it with you.
We had a big problem with our heating in our house a few weeks ago,
exactly when it is was so freezing cold in Nottingham that they were
talking about the coldest winter. I imagined it is going to be a bit
difficult to sleep when I could
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:57 AM, chris wuthrich
christian.wuthr...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Sage has
so many useful applications !
No one knows more about this than David Kirkby [1] :-)
Sage: creating a viable free open source alternative to Magma, Maple,
Mathematica and Matlab,
On Sunday 31 January 2010, chris wuthrich wrote:
Sorry for the spam; but I thought I'd share it with you.
We had a big problem with our heating in our house a few weeks ago,
exactly when it is was so freezing cold in Nottingham that they were
talking about the coldest winter. I imagined it
On Jan 31, 1:37 pm, lutusp lut...@gmail.com wrote:
Then why do you bother posting things that look like requests for
help?
In the hope that someone will fix the source, rather than offer new
patches?
This is contradictory: the way the source gets fixed is that people
post patches, and then
Given the climate here in Duluth, I would be happy to host a build
farm in my house...
-Marshall
On Jan 31, 5:23 pm, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
On Sunday 31 January 2010, chris wuthrich wrote:
Sorry for the spam; but I thought I'd share it with you.
We had a big
Since the topic of desktop-based apps for Sage has come up recently on
this list, I thought it might be a good time to point out that a very
good way to create a desktop-based GUI for Sage is to use one of the
open source Java IDEs as a foundation. This is what I did when I
created SageIDE a
Just curious how this is going if anyone has given up or its still
happening.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
I believe our problems are solved reguards the OpenSSL / GPL issue.
Follow this logic.
1) The GPL is copyright the Free Software Federation. It says that at
the top of the GPL license.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt
2) The Free Sofware Federation contain a list of licenses compatible
Note that the OpenSSL license is in the section of that page outlining
licenses incompatible with the GPL. Here's the summary of OpenSSL on that
page:
The license of OpenSSL is a conjunction of two licenses, one of them being
the license of SSLeay. You must follow both. The combination results
On 31 January 2010 21:53, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that Sage 4.3.0.1.alpha1 [1] successfully builds
on t2.math. Due to an unfortunate typo, the version number should be
Sage 4.3.0.2.alpha1 since it's based on Sage 4.3.0.1 [2]. This alpha
On 1 February 2010 03:33, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 31 January 2010 21:53, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm happy to announce that Sage 4.3.0.1.alpha1 [1] successfully builds
on t2.math. Due to an unfortunate typo, the version number should be
Sage
On 1 February 2010 03:26, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
Note that the OpenSSL license is in the section of that page outlining
licenses incompatible with the GPL. Here's the summary of OpenSSL on that
page:
The license of OpenSSL is a conjunction of two licenses, one of them being
On 31 January 2010 22:57, chris wuthrich christian.wuthr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the spam; but I thought I'd share it with you.
We had a big problem with our heating in our house a few weeks ago,
exactly when it is was so freezing cold in Nottingham that they were
talking about the
On 31 January 2010 14:27, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't see any point listing HP-UX. That platform died in 2004. I saw
its grave.
Here is one of the many obituaries:
http://www.chillingeffects.org/responses/notice.cgi?NoticeID=1460
I see you suggested Sage switch to
On 31 January 2010 21:28, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jaap,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
Ok, I seem to be on the ban list of everybody?
Certainly not. Not on mine.
Please help.
I'm very new with OpenSolaris. But is there an
On 31 January 2010 21:20, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
Hi c++ experts,
My C++ is a little bit rusty, so I'll ask here.
Any thoughts?
Jaap
Ok, I seem to be on the ban list of everybody? Please help.
jaap
Certainly not on my ban list - in fact nobody is.
Hi David,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:43 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
SNIP
You have several options.
1) William has a virtual machine I believe.
I vaguely recall a machine called disk.math or something that runs
OpenSolaris.
2) You can install it in VirtualBox.
That is
On 01/31/2010 04:05 AM, Simon King wrote:
When working on some trac tickets, I found that the preview button
does not work.
Trac claimed that it was an invalid operation. Afterwards, when
This *may* have happened during a server-side change, e.g., while
configuring a plug-in.
returning to
On 31 January 2010 14:27, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't see any point listing HP-UX. That platform died in 2004. I saw
its grave.
Here is one of the many obituaries:
http://www.chillingeffects.org/responses/notice.cgi?NoticeID=1460
The latest release of HP-UX was
On 1 February 2010 04:53, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:43 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
SNIP
You have several options.
1) William has a virtual machine I believe.
I vaguely recall a machine called disk.math or something
I think I've done a LOT for Sage - I would request you do not
purposely break the PA-RISC support in MPIR, when it clearly passes
all your self tests on HP-UX. I do not believe thiat is an
unreasonable request.
I take issue with the claim that you have done a LOT for Sage. Let
me be clear:
By and large, we are a community of mathematicians. Correct me if
I'm wrong, but you are not contributing to the mathematical aspects
of Sage. Until that changes, your goals and my goals are only
occasionally aligned.
I hate to think that the only people that are valid contributors to
On 1 February 2010 05:51, Tim Lahey tim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Solaris isn't exactly an unusual architecture. That's what he's done the
most at
supporting. He certainly has done a LOT at supporting it. I think what he's
asking
that Bill not purposely break FLINT since it does currently
On 31 January 2010 17:21, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hmm, the link could help:
http://mpir.org/supported.html
It's not on the main MPIR webpage yet, as this is a proposal, which
will need approval of the MPIR devels, after a period of discussion.
Bill.
Under:
On 2010-Jan-30 11:51:08 +, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Bill Hart wrote:
Cause of what David? MPIR 1.3.0 works absolutely fine on t2 if you set
the library paths correctly.
I'm not convinced it should be necessary to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH like
that. It is not with other
On 2010-Jan-31 22:02:19 -0800, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Not at all. But take away mathematics, and we don't have a
*product*. Take away release management, fixing bugs, documentation,
or maintaining the web site and we have an inferior project, but we
still have a
Does anyone here have experience configuring and managing a Buildbot system?
http://buildbot.net/trac
http://djmitche.github.com/buildbot/docs/latest/
To enable continuous, automated builds on several platforms, we could
* Set up a meta-repository of the Sage Mercurial repositories and
spkgs.
On 31-Jan-10, at 11:35 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2010-Jan-31 22:02:19 -0800, Nick Alexander
ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Not at all. But take away mathematics, and we don't have a
*product*. Take away release management, fixing bugs, documentation,
or maintaining the web site and we have
After reading
http://blogs.sun.com/janp/entry/on_openssl_versions_in_solaris
I discovered that Sun do ship Open SSL 0.9.7, complete with any
security fixes, with Solaris. Sun obviously have some agreement with
the OpenSSL developers, as they will know of security vunrabilites
before they are
72 matches
Mail list logo
