Yes, there it was! Strangely it used to be under domain. Many thanks.
>>> Damian Krzeminski 04/28/09 10:00 PM >>>
Tony Graziano wrote:
> Was this removed or the configuration simply hidden in 4.0?
>
I think it's configurable under Server->Services->SIP Registrar
D.
Hi,
I had exactly the same issues I think and what I did is in the Domain I put the
FQHN and added an alias of the FQDN and that fixes it.
I dont know if that is a bug or how it's meant to be but it works for me.
Cheers
Grant
From: sipx-users-boun...@li
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:54 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Tim Byng wrote:
>>> I found a problem in the sipxbridge code. Please check out r15319. I
>>> believe it is fixed. Please try it before bothering with a snapshot.
>>
>> I updated to r15321 and retested. Unfor
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 12:02 +1000, Josh Marshall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just installed 4.0 from the ISO. I configured some extensions and
> they can call each other and voicemail / attendant / outgoing through
> gateway fine. When I try to configure an ACD it falls through
> immediately to the ov
Hi,
I have just installed 4.0 from the ISO. I configured some extensions and
they can call each other and voicemail / attendant / outgoing through
gateway fine. When I try to configure an ACD it falls through
immediately to the overflow number. I also noticed whenever I activate
the ACR server aft
Tony Graziano wrote:
> Was this removed or the configuration simply hidden in 4.0?
>
I think it's configurable under Server->Services->SIP Registrar
D.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/
But does this mean it's not configurable or useable? When I upgraded I lost
that capability and would prefer not to revert back to 3.10 if possible.
-Original Message-
From: "Scott Lawrence"
To: Tony Graziano
Cc:
Sent: 4/28/2009 9:02:29 PM
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.0, what happene
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 20:46 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Was this removed or the configuration simply hidden in 4.0?
The underlying routing capability is certainly still there.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: ht
Was this removed or the configuration simply hidden in 4.0?
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
How does one log in to an ACD Queue via keypad on the
phone? I have a number of Queues setup and I cannot find out how to login to
my queues using my test phones.
Dial *88 to sign-in
*86 to sign-out
Also, I assume I can dial/transfer to the lines that I
created for my ACD Queues as wel
I am getting the following error with yum updates to 4.0 regarding
need for ruby-rdoc.
Any help appreciated.
Charles
--> Running transaction check
---> Package sipxmediaadapterlib.i386 0:4.0.0-015321 set to be updated
---> Package sipxconfig-tftp.i386 0:4.0.0-015321 set to be updated
---> Pack
Hi Scott
Thank you very much. Your team has done a fantastic job. Believe it or not
I have been talking up this project since before 3.10. I have had 3.10 in
production since it was released and it has worked flawlessly. I look
forward to using this latest version
r
- Original Message --
On Thu, 2009-04-23 I wrote:
>
> To help preserve the ability to look at different parts of the project
> (and the teams that work on them), a new field has been added to all
> issues: the Area field is a multi-checkbox field (so that issues can be
> in more than one area, but this is expected to b
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 15:24 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
>
>
> Centos 5.2 originally from 3.10 ISO, upgrading via rpm/yum.
>
> I also did a
>
> yum remove sipxecs
>
> then
>
> Running Transaction
> Installing: sipxproxy### [ 1/10]
> Installing: s
>> >>> On 4/28/2009 at 3:14 PM, in
> message
<1d9361c130b11c4db300adbfca365270051bf...@zrtphxm0.corp.nortel.co
> m>, "Alfred
Campbell" wrote:
>> >>> On 4/28/2009 at 1:49 PM, in
> > > message
> > <1d9361c130b11c4db300adbfca365270051be...@zrtphxm0.corp.nortel.co
> > > m>, "Alfred
> > Campbell"
I have been looking for some documentation about this, but can't seem to
find the answers.
How does one log in to an ACD Queue via keypad on the phone? I have a
number of Queues setup and I cannot find out how to login to my queues
using my test phones.
Also, I assume I can dial/transfer t
>> >>> On 4/28/2009 at 1:49 PM, in
> message
<1d9361c130b11c4db300adbfca365270051be...@zrtphxm0.corp.nortel.co
> m>, "Alfred
Campbell" wrote:
Subject: [sipX-dev] sipXecs 4.0.0 is
> released!
> >
> > The build 4.0.0-015321 has been promoted to 'stable' status, and is
> now
> > available in the
> Nice! I followed your instructions and it works. Instructions
> don't get much better than this. Thanks for your help.
>
> If you're going to put these instructions on the wiki, I have
> just a few
> comments/suggestions:
> - Change "...UDP port range 3 to 3100..." to "...UDP port
> range
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Tim Byng wrote:
>> I found a problem in the sipxbridge code. Please check out r15319. I
>> believe it is fixed. Please try it before bothering with a snapshot.
>
> I updated to r15321 and retested. Unfortunately the issue still exists; I
> can only receive incoming
Nice! I followed your instructions and it works. Instructions don't get much
better than this. Thanks for your help.
If you're going to put these instructions on the wiki, I have just a few
comments/suggestions:
- Change "...UDP port range 3 to 3100..." to "...UDP port range 3 to
31000..."
> I found a problem in the sipxbridge code. Please check out r15319. I
> believe it is fixed. Please try it before bothering with a snapshot.
I updated to r15321 and retested. Unfortunately the issue still exists; I
can only receive incoming calls up to 90 seconds after registration.
In other po
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 17:59 +0300, an...@iguanait.com wrote:
> Ah yes, this explain the things. Provider's dns server are updating
> slowly and this explain the things.
>
> Dig returns this result in one of our server in germany:
>
> sipxecs.sipfoundry.org. 82616 IN A 216.142.118.34
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 16:40 +0100, Gabor Paller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of our customers is interested, how to activate immediate
> forwarding. E.g. 200 is forwarded to 202 and it happens immediately, 200
> does not ring first, only 202. Is there any way to do it with SipX 4.0?
Set the forwarding i
The build 4.0.0-015321 has been promoted to 'stable' status, and is now
available in the sipXecs public stable distribution area:
http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs
The yum repository definitions and the LatestStable link have been
updated to reflect this.
Some development will continue
> > I'll be able to help you but first I need to understand your setup
> > better. Do you have a true DMZ whereby the sipXecs in the
> DMZ has a
> > publicly reachable IP address or does it have a private IP
> address and
> > the Router in front does all the 'NATing'?
>
> Thanks Robert. I do
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 16:34 -0700, Asaf Rapoport wrote:
> Can anyone connect to the repo to download RPM's or the ISO?
> http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/temp/sipXecs/main/CentOS/5/i386/RPM/repodata/repom
> d.xml: [Errno 4] IOError: refused')>
> Trying other mirror.
> Error: Cannot retr
>> I found a problem in the sipxbridge code. Please check out r15319. I
>> believe it is fixed. Please try it before bothering with a snapshot.
> The build number for 4.0 from last night is 15289, so it appears that I'll
> have to wait until tomorrow to test this fix.
I have been reading all of t
>>> On 4/28/2009 at 12:20 PM, in message
, "Gabor
Paller" wrote:
> Well, for a bug related to forwarding on the desk phones, I got the
> following response from Scott Lawrence:
> Scott Lawrence, SipX chief architect:
> "On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 15:46 +, Gabor Paller wrote:
> > " Don't do forwardi
Well, for a bug related to forwarding on the desk phones, I got the
following response from Scott Lawrence:
Scott Lawrence, SipX chief architect:
"On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 15:46 +, Gabor Paller wrote:
> " Don't do forwarding on the phone -- configure sipX to do it."
Regards,
Gabor
-Original
>>> On 4/28/2009 at 11:52 AM, in
> message
<49f6ee0b025a5...@mail.myitdepartment.net>, "Tony
> Graziano"
wrote:
On 4/28/2009 at 11:40 AM, in
> message
> , "Gabor
> Paller" wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > One of our customers is interested, how to activate immediate
> > forwarding. E.g. 20
I am trying to achieve the very basic "forwarding" functionality. I am
sitting at my desk and have to go to another desk. Therefore I forward
my calls from my desk to that other desk. The desk phone on my desk
should not ring (unnecessary, I am not there), only on the other desk.
I think it is qui
>>> On 4/28/2009 at 11:40 AM, in message
, "Gabor
Paller" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of our customers is interested, how to activate immediate
> forwarding. E.g. 200 is forwarded to 202 and it happens immediately, 200
> does not ring first, only 202. Is there any way to do it with SipX 4.0?
>
> Regard
Hi,
One of our customers is interested, how to activate immediate
forwarding. E.g. 200 is forwarded to 202 and it happens immediately, 200
does not ring first, only 202. Is there any way to do it with SipX 4.0?
Regards,
Gabor
___
sipx-users mailing list
All, the IP's did change and if you need them the new IP is below
OLD:
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: sipxecs.sipfoundry.org
Address:* 216.142.118.34*
[r...@dev-pbx ~]# nslookup
> server 4.2.2.1
Default server: 4.2.2.1
Address: 4.2.2.1#53
> sipxecs.sipfoundry.org
Server: 4.2.2.1
Address:
anebi iguanait.com iguanait.com> writes:
>
> Ah yes, this explain the things. Provider's dns server are updating
> slowly and this explain the things.
>
> Dig returns this result in one of our server in germany:
>
> sipxecs.sipfoundry.org. 82616 IN A 216.142.118.34
I had the s
>>> On 4/28/2009 at 10:53 AM, in message <49f7184c.60...@glensound.co.uk>, Keith
Gearty wrote:
> Sounds like it could be a DNS caching issue at our local ISPs.
> Hopefully its a problem that will go away in a few days.
>
> Damian Krzeminski wrote:
>
> >sipxecs.sipfoundry.org has been moved to
> I'll be able to help you but first I need to understand your setup
> better. Do you have a true DMZ whereby the sipXecs in the DMZ has a
> publicly reachable IP address or does it have a private IP address and
> the Router in front does all the 'NATing'?
Thanks Robert. I don't have a true DMZ;
Ah yes, this explain the things. Provider's dns server are updating
slowly and this explain the things.
Dig returns this result in one of our server in germany:
sipxecs.sipfoundry.org. 82616 IN A 216.142.118.34
The same is also from my home pc.
I will wait some days, then will che
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 07:54 +0200, Rene Pankratz wrote:
> Doesn't the voicemail server support DTMF over SIP-Info at all?
No, it doesn't.
Dale
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/
> I've been trying to find some documentation on how to set up
> remote workers in 4.0. Can someone please point me to the doc
> page, or if the docs haven't been updated yet, let me know
> the basics? I tried to set up x-lite and was able to register
> by setting the proxy to the external IP,
Sounds like it could be a DNS caching issue at our local ISPs.
Hopefully its a problem that will go away in a few days.
Damian Krzeminski wrote:
>sipxecs.sipfoundry.org has been moved to another server
>Looks like in some cases people still get old IP address from DNS, which
>might explain why
Works fine for me too.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
alande...@slingshot.co.nz
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 10:02 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] What happens to sipxecs repository and do
> I found a problem in the sipxbridge code. Please check out r15319. I
> believe it is fixed. Please try it before bothering with a snapshot.
The build number for 4.0 from last night is 15289, so it appears that I'll
have to wait until tomorrow to test this fix.
__
kenny.mitch...@ineos.com wrote:
>
> I too cannot access the site or the download area, I get a 401 error.
> When I try to follow any of the links from the www.sipfoundry.org
> website to the sipxecs.sipfoundry.org website they all fail. I just
> assumed your servers were down for maintenance.
Hi There,
I am having no problems at all getting to the sites or
the download pages. Are you by chance behind a caching server, and
have you cleared all temp internet files and cookies. You might have
a stale cookie.
Alan
Quoting "an...@iguanait.com" :
> Hi,
>
> i'm trying to access a
Hi,
i'm trying to access and to download the latest rpms for sipxecs 4.0,
but i get "Failed to Connect
Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at
sipxecs.sipfoundry.org."
I also this from yum:
http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/temp/sipXecs/main/CentOS/5/x86_64/RPM/repodata/repomd.xml:
[
It works fine for me here (still). It is more likely a routing issue somewhere
that affects certain regions. Certainly a traceroute might confirm this for you
or others.
1<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms
2 1 ms<1 ms 1 ms router.mydomain.com [xxx]
3 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms
I too cannot access the site or the download area, I get a 401 error. When
I try to follow any of the links from the www.sipfoundry.org website to
the sipxecs.sipfoundry.org website they all fail. I just assumed your
servers were down for maintenance. The name resolves to IP address just
fin
Ive just installed a test machine from the same image.
/etc/yum.repos.d directory is empty
.
To install something from a standard repository you should create a file
(with 644 permission and root:root ownership) in this directory like this:
[r...@sipx3 ~]# cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.re
Tony Graziano wrote:
As for the "document contains no data" issue, I don;t have that issue here. So
maybe you have a network or proxy issue on your side.
I can access /www.sipfoundry.org/ and /track.sipfoundry.org/ without
problem, but /sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/ causes a "document contains no
I downloaded the 4.0 image from here today:
http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/ISO/
but i had to realize that this is not a stable build.
René
2009/4/28 Keith Gearty
> Rene Pankratz wrote:
>
> SipX 4.0 is already available in the stable download section
>
> Since when? The last time I
>>> On 4/28/2009 at 8:21 AM, in message <49f6f4e4.1010...@glensound.co.uk>,
>>> Keith
Gearty wrote:
> Rene Pankratz wrote:
>
> > SipX 4.0 is already available in the stable download section
>
> Since when? The last time I checked (yesterday) it was still in the
> */Nightly builds and developm
I wanted to install another CentOS/FC package. (e.g. midnight commander)
But i got the message that there is no such package available.
Yes indeed there isn't any repo added to the CentOS installation.
I assumed that the 4.0 ISO would be a stable relase as ist was in the
stable-download-section.
Rene Pankratz wrote:
SipX 4.0 is already available in the stable download section
Since when? The last time I checked (yesterday) it was still in the
*/Nightly builds and development releases "temp"/* folder not the
*/Stable Releases "pub"/* folder. So it is a Release Candidate, not a
sta
>>> On 4/28/2009 at 7:34 AM, in message
<49f6b17e025a5...@mail.myitdepartment.net>, "Tony Graziano"
wrote:
> Post the contents of your sipx repo here.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rene Pankratz
> To:
>
> Sent: 4/28/2009 7:22:30 AM
> Subject: [sipx-users] Howto use yum for inst
Post the contents of your sipx repo here.
-Original Message-
From: Rene Pankratz
To:
Sent: 4/28/2009 7:22:30 AM
Subject: [sipx-users] Howto use yum for installing additional packages withthe
4.0 CentOS Installation CD?
Hello,
I just installed Sipx 4.0 using sipfoundry-4.0.0-015289-i3
Hello,
I just installed Sipx 4.0 using sipfoundry-4.0.0-015289-i386.iso CentOS
image.
When trying to install additional packages using yum i get the message that
the package is not available. The repository seems to be missing. As I am
not familiar with CentOS and yum I need to know how to add the
At the same time, there is still code being worked on before it is declared
stable and before 3.10.x stable installs can upgrade. It is still a work in
progress. As an example, Ranga checked in a fix yesterday that relates to ITSP
registrations/expirations for sipXbridge.
Tony
>>> Rene Pankrat
SipX 4.0 is already available in the stable download section
René
2009/4/28 Keith Gearty
> Realisticly, how long is it likely to be before 4.0 becomes stable?
> Days? Weeks? A month or more? I ask because my boss is pressing me to
> get on with upgrading our phone system.
>
> Keith.
> __
Realisticly, how long is it likely to be before 4.0 becomes stable?
Days? Weeks? A month or more? I ask because my boss is pressing me to
get on with upgrading our phone system.
Keith.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List
I just discovered that I can use the webui to deploy the files to TFTP,
then acess them through the web server by pointing the browser at
http://servername:8090/phone/profile/tftproot/filename.wav . That's
really great because it means that I can administer the files through
the web interface!
I have some custom ringtone WAVs that I would like to upload as
unmanaged files, and have them accessible through the web server. Is
there any way of doing this through the web ui?
If not then I'll make do with uploading them manually using the console,
but I'm not sure where to put them. I t
Hi,
i'm trying to setup a sipx pbx for internal use and testing.
I'm using a patton gateway and some snom 370 phones.
No problems with the gateway and with phones, but i cannot
setup a working "calls monitoring" configuration.
I created 4 extension from 200 to 203 on each extension i added
other
Hi,
I just set up a lab system with sipX 4.1.x (latest unstable) in a OpenSuSE 11.1
environment. It all installed fine and I added a bunch of users and phones
(Polycom 430's). After this I get an error message ("An internal error has
occured..blabla") every time I click on either a user or a ph
64 matches
Mail list logo
