You must reindex the complete document, even if you just want to update a
single field.
On Friday 03 December 2010 04:52:04 Adam Estrada wrote:
OK part 2 of my previous question...
Is there a way to batch update field values based on a certain criteria?
For example, if thousands of
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, Mark static.void@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mark static.void@gmail.com
Subject: Limit number of characters returned
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 5:39 AM
Is there way to limit the number of
characters returned from a stored field?
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Tanguy Moal tanguy.m...@gmail.com wrote:
However suddenly CPU usage simply doubles, and sometimes eventually
start using all 16 cores of the server, whereas the number of handled
request is pretty stable, and even starts decreasing because of
degraded user
Actually, i took a look at the code again, the queries you mentioned:
I send queries to that field in the form (*term1*term2*)
I think the patch will not fix your problem... The only way i know you
can fix this would be to upgrade to lucene/solr trunk, where wildcard
comparison is linear to the
Thank you very much Robert for replying that fast and accurately.
I have effectively an other idea in mind to provide similar
suggestions less expansively, I was balancing between the work around
and the report issue options.
I don't regret it since you came with a possible fix. I'll give it a
From Solr's perspective, the fact that multiple threads are
sending data to be indexed is invisible, Solr is just
reading http requests. So I don't think what you're asking
for is possible.
Could you outline the reason you want to do this? Perhaps
there's another way to accomplish it.
Best
Erick
Hi,
I made a MappingUpdateRequestHandler which lets you map country codes to full
country names with a config file. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2151
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 3. des. 2010, at 00.03, Adam Estrada wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Can I facet the same field twice with a different prefix as per example
below?
facet.field=myfield
f.myfield.facet.prefix=*make*
f.myfield.facet.sort=count
facet.field=myfield
f.myfield.facet.prefix=*model*
f.myfield.facet.sort=count
Thanks and Regards
Ericz
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Tanguy Moal tanguy.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much Robert for replying that fast and accurately.
I have effectively an other idea in mind to provide similar
suggestions less expansively, I was balancing between the work around
and the report issue
No, there's no equivalent to SQL update for all values in a column. You'll
have to reindex all the documents.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Adam Estrada estrada.adam.gro...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK part 2 of my previous question...
Is there a way to batch update field values based on a certain
Hi list,
I got a little problem with my mm definition:
2-1 450% 566%
Here is what it *should* mean:
If there are 2 clauses, at least one has to match.
If there are more than 2 clauses, at least 50% should match (both rules seem
to mean the same, don't they?).
And if there are 5 or more than
On 12/3/2010 6:18 AM, Em wrote:
I got a little problem with my mm definition:
2-1 450% 566%
Are you defining this in a request handler in solrconfig.xml? If you
have it entered just like that, I think it may not be understanding it.
You need to encode the character. Here's an excerpt
from:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#mm_.28Minimum_.27Should.27_Match.29
If there are less than 3 optional clauses, they all must match; for 3 to 5
clauses, one less than the number of clauses must match, for 6 or more
clauses, 80% must match, rounded down: 2-1 580%
Personally,
Thank you both!
Erick,
what you said was absolutely correct.
I missunderstood the definition completely.
Now it works as intended.
Thank you!
Kind regards
Erick Erickson wrote:
from:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#mm_.28Minimum_.27Should.27_Match.29
If there are less
Correct me if I am wrong but I would like to return highlighted excerpts
from the document so I would still need to index and store the whole
document right (ie.. highlighting only works on stored fields)?
On 12/3/10 3:51 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
--- On Fri, 12/3/10,
Users call this URL on my site:
/?search=1city=den+haag
or even /?search=1city=Den+Haag (casing of ctyname can be anything)
Under water I call Solr:
http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?indent=onfacet=truefq=city:den+haagq=*:*start=0rows=25fl=id,title,friendlyurl,cityfacet.field=city
but
When returning results is there a way I can say to return all fields
except a certain one?
So say I have stored fields foo, bar and baz but I only want to return
foo and bar. Is it possible to do this without specifically listing out
the fields I do want?
Yep, you're correct. CopyField is probably your simplest option here as
Ahmet suggested.
A more complex solution would be your own response writer, but unless and
until you
index gets cumbersome, I'd avoid that. Plus, storing the copied contents
only shouldn't
impact search much, since this
Thanks for the response.
Couldn't I just use the highlighter and configure it to use the
alternative field to return the first 200 characters? In cases where
there is a highlighter match I would prefer to show the excerpts anyway.
The root of your problem, I think, is fq=city:den+haag which parses into
city:den +defaultfield:haag
Try parens, i.e. city:(den haag).
Attaching debugQuery=on is often a way to see thing like this quickly
Also, if you haven't seen the analysis page from the admin page, it's really
valuable
You are right, this is what I see when I append the debug query (very very
useful btw!!!) in old situation:
arr name=parsed_filter_queries
strcity:den title:haag/str
strPhraseQuery(themes:hotel en restaur)/str
/arr
I then changed the schema.xml to:
fieldType name=myField
Thanks,
I was able to fix this issue with combination of EdgeNGrams and fuzzy query.
here are details
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
I just added fuzzyquery operator and seems to be working so far
--
View this message in
when you went from strField to TextField in your config you enabled
tokenizing (which I believe splits on spaces by default),
which is why you see seperate 'words' / terms in the debugQuery-explanation.
I believe you want to keep your old strField config and try quoting:
fq=city:den+haag or
thanks ..
i used
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
with fuzzy operator..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-1-4-suggester-component-tp1766915p2012946.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
hi
I was looking to boost certain docs based on some values in a indexed field.
e.g.
pType
-
post paid
go phone
Would like to have post paid docs first and then go phone.
I checked the functional query but could not figure out.
Any help?
--
View this message in context:
Couldn't I just use the highlighter and configure it to use
the
alternative field to return the first 200 characters?
In cases where
there is a highlighter match I would prefer to show the
excerpts anyway.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.alternateField
I wonder...I know that sed would work to find and replace the terms in all
of the csv files that I am indexing but would it work to find and replace
key terms in the index?
find C:\\tmp\\index\\data -type f -exec sed -i 's/AF/AFGHANISTAN/g' {} \;
That command would iterate through all the files
hi all,
[This is a second attempt at emailing. The apache mailing list spam filter
apparently did not like my synonyms entry, ie.. classified my email as spam.
I have replaced phone with 'foo' , 'cell' with 'sell' and 'mobile' with
'nubile' ]
This is a fairly basic synonyms question: how does
On Friday 03 December 2010 18:20:44 Adam Estrada wrote:
I wonder...I know that sed would work to find and replace the terms in all
of the csv files that I am indexing but would it work to find and replace
key terms in the index?
It'll most likely corrupt your index. Offsets, positions etc
When returning results is there a way
I can say to return all fields except a certain one?
So say I have stored fields foo, bar and baz but I only
want to return foo and bar. Is it possible to do this
without specifically listing out the fields I do want?
There were a similar discussion.
Arrrgh, Geert-Jan is right, that't the 15th time at least this has tripped
me up.
I'm pretty sure that text will work if you escape the space, e.g.
city:(den\ haag). The debug output is a little confusing since it has a line
like
city:den haag
which almost looks wrong... but it worked
out OK on
Uhhm, what are you trying to do? What do you want to do with the scores from
two cores?
Best
Erick
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ma, Xiaohui (NIH/NLM/LHC) [C]
xiao...@mail.nlm.nih.gov wrote:
I have multiple cores. How can I deal with score?
Thanks so much for help!
Xiaohui
I was looking to boost certain docs based on some values in
a indexed field.
e.g.
pType
-
post paid
go phone
Would like to have post paid docs first and then go phone.
I checked the functional query but could not figure out.
You can use
Have you consider defining synonyms for your code -country
conversion at index time (or query time for that matter)?
We may have an XY problem here. Could you state the high-level
problem you're trying to solve? Maybe there's a better solution...
Best
Erick
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Adam
hi all,
Does solrj support swapping cores?
One of our developers had initially tried swapping solr cores (e.g. core0
and core1) using the solrj api, but it failed. (don't have the exact error)
He susequently replaced the call with straight http (i.e. http client).
Unfortunately I don't have the
First off...I know enough about Solr to be VERY dangerous so please bare
with me ;-) I am indexing the geonames database which only provides country
codes. I can facet the codes but to the end user who may not know all 249
codes, it isn't really all that helpful. Therefore, I want to map the full
Hi,
After issueing a dataimport, I've noticed solr returns a response prior to
finishing the import. Is this correct? Is there anyway i can make solr not
return until it finishes?
If not, how do I ping for the status whether it finished or not?
thanks,
tri
Hey folks, I'm working with a fairly specific set of requirements for
our corpus that needs a somewhat tricky text type for both indexing and
searching.
The chain currently looks like this:
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.PatternReplaceFilterFactory
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, Tri Nguyen tringuye...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Tri Nguyen tringuye...@yahoo.com
Subject: dataimports response returns before done?
To: solr user solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 7:55 PM
Hi,
After issueing a dataimport, I've noticed solr
Please correct me if I am doing something wrong. I really appreciate your help!
I have a core for metadata (xml files) and a core for pdf documents. Sometimes
I need search them separately, sometimes I need search both of them together.
There is the same key which is related them for each item.
Ok simple enough. I just created a SearchComponent that removes values
from the fl param.
On 12/3/10 9:32 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
When returning results is there a way
I can say to return all fields except a certain one?
So say I have stored fields foo, bar and baz but I only
want to return
Is there a way I can specify separate configuration for 2 different fields.
For field 1 I wan to display only 100 chars, Field 2 200 chars
Hello everyone! I would like to ask you a question about DIH.
I am using a database and DIH to sync against Solr, and a GUI to
display and operate on the items retrieved from Solr.
When I change the state of an item through the GUI, the following happens:
a. The item is updated in the DB.
b. A
thanks!! that worked..
Can i enter the sequence too like postpaid,free,costly?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/boosting-certain-docs-based-on-a-filed-value-tp2012962p2013895.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes
Some parameters may be overriden on a per-field basis with the following
syntax:
f.fieldName.originalParam=value
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
Is there a way I can specify separate configuration for 2 different fields.
For field 1 I wan to display only 100
Is there a way I can specify separate
configuration for 2 different fields.
For field 1 I wan to display only 100 chars, Field 2 200
chars
yes with the parameter accepts per-field overrides. the syntax is
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#HowToOverride
thanks!! that worked..
Can i enter the sequence too like postpaid,free,costly?
Does that mean you want to display first postpaid, after that free, and lastly
costly?
If thats you want, i think it is better to create a tint field using these
types and then sort by this field.
That will certainly work. Another option, assuming the country codes are
in their own field would be to put the transformations into a synonym file
that was only used on that field. That way you'd get this without having
to do the pre-process step of the raw data...
That said, if you
The scores will not be comparable. Scores are only relevant within one
search
on one core, so comparing them across two queries (even if it's the same
query
but against two different cores) is meaningless.
So, given your setup I would just use the results from one of the cores and
fill in
data
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
But why do you have two cores in the first place? Is it really necessary or
is it just
making things more complex?
I don't know why the OP wants two cores, but I ran into this same
problem and had to abandon using a
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters?#hl.highlightMultiTerm
If the SpanScorer is also being used, enables highlighting for
range/wildcard/fuzzy/prefix queries. Default is false. Solr1.4. This
parameter makes sense for Highlighter only.
I think this meant 'for PhraseHighlighter
If you are using another app to create the index, I think you can remove the
update servlet mapping in the web.xml.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Restrict-access-to-localhost-tp2004475p2014129.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
52 matches
Mail list logo
