On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 12:33, Stewart, John wrote:
A few days ago, someone mentioned graphing stats from
spamassassin using
MRTG and others. Well, I got that working, and it's pretty slick.
Care to share the recipe for this? I didn't see anything in the SAtalk
archive...
'twould
I have the SpamAssassin installed site wide and would
like to know there is a way to configure that if the
user is in white list don't do any other checks. We
need this because 80% of the mail handled by our mail
server is from within the company domain and all the
company domain mail is white
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:06:26PM -0700, Seby Varghese wrote:
I have the SpamAssassin installed site wide and would
like to know there is a way to configure that if the
user is in white list don't do any other checks. We
need this because 80% of the mail handled by our mail
There is no
A few days ago, someone mentioned graphing stats from spamassassin using
MRTG and others. Well, I got that working, and it's pretty slick.
I was wondering about other non-time-based graphs? In other words I
don't want to graph how many emails were tagged as spam, but I want a
graph of how many
How'd you get it working? I managed to make a flat line with mine. :-)
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:09 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin (non-time-based) Graphs?
A few days ago, someone mentioned
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 20:42, Philip Clever wrote:
what graphing have you set up thus far?
The current graph is spam vs time, as in number of spam emails per
minute (or hour, day, year, etc...). What I want to graph now is the
spamassassin point value vs quanity of each.
What I want is a set
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 20:26, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
How'd you get it working? I managed to make a flat line with mine. :-)
I had that problem too. I put on my perl thinking hat, and I traced it
back to a problem with a function call to the line of code that tries to
pull the date off of the
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 08:59:49PM -0500, Jeremy Turner wrote:
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 20:42, Philip Clever wrote:
what graphing have you set up thus far?
The current graph is spam vs time, as in number of spam emails per
minute (or hour, day, year, etc...). What I want to graph now is the
I note that Spamassassin bug report 486 is still open. I am
running Mimedefang 2.16 and spamassassin 2.31. I'd like to be
able to run Mimedefang and Spamassassin with open relay testing
for Spamassassin. When I do so with my configuration I have the
zombie process problem. My question is
I think it's something to do with razor. But it stalls for many many
minutes on connecting to this server and doesn't seem to be affected by
razor_timeout. Anybody have a clue? I've disabled RAZOR_CHECK
altogether for now. Time to check out pyzor I guess.
Ken
I let Watchdog control SpamAssassin 2.41 on my OS X 10.2.1 server, from
watchdog.conf:
spamd:respawn:/usr/bin/spamd -x -u daemon #load spamd
When the computer boots it launches Watchdog last, from
/System/Library/StartupItems/Watchdog/StartupParameters.plist:
Requires = (DirectoryServices,
On Sunday 06 October 2002 09:22 CET Ian Vännman wrote:
[...]
Yet spamd fails due to some MX lookup problem, from /var/log/mail.log:
Oct 6 05:29:53 admins-Computer spamd[426]: MX lookup died: Illegal
division by zero at /Library/Perl/Net/DNS/Resolver.pm line 818. Bad file
descriptor
[...]
[admins-computer:~] root# perl -MNet::DNS -e 'print $Net::DNS::VERSION\n'
0.28
[admins-computer:~] root# echo '816,820p' | ed
/Library/Perl/Net/DNS/Resolver.pm
43033
# Perform each round of retries.
for (my $i = 0;
$i $self-{'retry'};
++$i, $retrans *=
(fwding to devel and talk)
Here it is:
http://spamassassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.42.tar.gz
This is well stable, I should think. I'll announce this one
on freshmeat, and Matt, could you upload it to CPAN?
***IMPORTANT***: if you're upgrading from a version 2.40, you should not
Vicki Brown wrote:
I have had a response that it is both and that the latest docs in CVS
should be more up to date. I'm not sure where and how to find those docs
but in any case I am at a loss.
As it often happens the developers were busy changing the code and left
some references to the old
I have had a response that it is both and that the latest docs in CVS
should be more up to date. I'm not sure where and how to find those docs
but in any case I am at a loss.
I have created a ~/.spamassassin.cf file several times. It is removed - every
time I create it, it is (eventually)
On Thursday 03 October 2002 08:26 CET Vicki Brown wrote:
The docs refer to ~/.spamassassin.cf but SpamAssassin creates a
directory, ~/.spamassassin, and populates it with auto-whitelist.db and
user_prefs.
So, is it ~/.spamassassin.cf or ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs or either or
both?
Please
I have:
[admin@linux admin]$ cat .procmailrc
LOGFILE=$HOME/pm.log
LOGABSTRACE=all
VERBOSE=on
:0
| /usr/bin/spamc
And then I went:
[lloy0076@linux lloy0076]$ mail
...
And got:
[admin@linux admin]$ cat pm.log
procmail: [3351] Fri Oct 4 10:48:49 2002
procmail: Assigning
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:52:34AM +0930, David Lloyd wrote:
:0
| /usr/bin/spamc
Any idea what might be happening or the other information that might be
relevant?
Per the documentation, you want :0fw which tells procmail to use spamc
as a filter. Without it, you try to deliver to spamc
Teho,
Per the documentation, you want :0fw which tells procmail to use spamc
as a filter. Without it, you try to deliver to spamc which isn't going
to work for you since spamassassin doesn't do delivery.
Which documentation? I got lost in it :-)
DSL
--
Qualcuno no mi basta.
Vivere
: Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin to reject spam?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx)
Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-27 12:56:50 -0400]:
BP It is better to delete it than to bounce it. Most of all spam is
BP injected with no way to receive a bounce. If you have received it
BP
Hello,
Is there anyway to configure Spamassassin or procmail (the system is
using spamd) to reject the mail instead of marking it as spam?
Thanks
--
Arnaud Abélard
Administrateur réseaux et systèmes
Irin / Faculté de Sciences
Université de Nantes
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 06:11, Arnaud Abelard wrote:
Hello,
Is there anyway to configure Spamassassin or procmail (the system is
using spamd) to reject the mail instead of marking it as spam?
Thanks
--
Arnaud Abélard
Administrateur réseaux et systèmes
Irin / Faculté de Sciences
Message-
From: Arnaud Abelard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 6:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] spamassassin to reject spam?
Hello,
Is there anyway to configure Spamassassin or procmail (the system is
using spamd) to reject the mail instead of marking
Hello,
I'm new to the list and spamassassin. I've setup a Debian Woody 3.0 box
with spamassassin and exim successfully delivering to local users. My
next task is putting together a second box which serves as an email
gateway. I included the following in my exim.conf under the transports
Hello,
i would like use spamassassin with rules they stored in mysql-db.
I have installed this but i have a question about it.
How work spamassassin with mail-aliases ?
i use postfix, and cyrus-imap with sieve-filter
i use also a webmailtool that authorizated users only about their
Using instructions in INSTALL (have to admit this is the second time
through this):
lcd 242# fg
cpan shell -- CPAN exploration and modules installation (v1.61)
ReadLine support available (try 'install Bundle::CPAN')
cpan install Bundle::CPAN
CPAN: Storable loaded ok
Going to read
Just for info, in case those of you using SpamAssassin are suffering
similarly...
From 06:40 (BST) this morning, SpamAssassin (version 2.31 running on 3
different servers) started taking a minimum of 28 seconds to process a
message. I've done quite a bit of poking about with it and it appears
|To: spamassassin-talk
|Subject: [SAtalk] spamassassin 2.41: spamc+spamd: e-mails concatenated
|
|
|Hello.
|
|I upgraded to spamassassin 2.41 yesterday. I have been using
|the spamc+spamd combination to spam check mail delivered via
|procmail from exim invoked by fetchmail.
|
|Today I found that several
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 12:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sounds like exactly what I wanted to do. I've never used Exim tho.
It sounds easy enough ( doesnt it always :) The config for Exim should
be pretty straight foward tho shouldnt it? Simply accept the mail and
pass it straight on to
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 09:37:02 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
wrote:
I'd like to use spamassassin to filter our e-mail. However the poweres
that be have dcreed that our mail service shall run on MS Exchange. Is
there a way to insert Spamassassin into the system so that it will filter
incoming mail
I'd like to use spamassassin to filter our e-mail. However
the poweres that be have dcreed that our mail service shall
run on MS Exchange. Is there a way to insert Spamassassin
into the system so that it will filter incoming mail before
it reaches the Exchange server?
I was looking on
Apologies if this has been covered elsewhere, I tried the archives but couldnt find
anything.
I'd like to use spamassassin to filter our e-mail. However the poweres that be have
dcreed that our mail service shall run on MS Exchange. Is there a way to insert
Spamassassin into the system so
Hello,
* Frank Bures [EMAIL PROTECTED] [22.07.02 20:07]:
could please anyone point me to instructions how to install SpamAssassin on
IRIX 6.5, specifically the spamd and spamc.
Hm, you do not need any special information, just build spamassassin the
normal way:
[unzip/untar the archive]
On 24-Jul-2002 at 08:18:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to use spamassassin to filter our e-mail. However the poweres
that be have dcreed that our mail service shall run on MS Exchange. Is
there a way to insert Spamassassin into the system so that it will filter
incoming mail before it
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:45:15 +0100 (BST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and Microsoft Exchange
We have Exchange systems for staff/student mailboxes. However, all the mail
comes into the Uni to two central Sun unix mailhubs. They run the Exim MTA
I'd like to use spamassassin to filter our e-mail. However
the poweres that be have dcreed that our mail service shall
run on MS Exchange. Is there a way to insert Spamassassin
into the system so that it will filter incoming mail before
it reaches the Exchange server?
We have
I just started using SA with Exim on a Linux machine ahead of my Exchange
servers. It works great.
MTodd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 6:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin
Title: RE: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin + QmailScanner
Hello All;
I've been folowing this thread with intrest since I haven't had success getting SA working with Qmail on my system. However when I tried to add this code I broke qmail-scanner. Where does this go exactly please? I know nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
could please anyone point me to instructions how to install SpamAssassin on
IRIX 6.5, specifically the spamd and spamc.
Thanks
Frank Bures, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Toronto, M5S 3H6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spamassassin and broken pipe
While trying to test spamassassin installing, i always end up with a 'broken pipe'
or no output at all.
With the command
cat sample-nonspam.txt | spamassassin -Dt nonspam.out
I get no output in nonspam.out.
with the command
spamassassin -Dt sample-nonspam.txt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Fi Mail on Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:56:03PM +0100:
ANy other ideas that i can test.
Yeah, man spamassassin and have a look at the -P argument.
- --
[!] Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31)
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Fi Mail wrote:
While trying to test spamassassin installing, i always end up with a
'broken pipe' or no output at all.
This is a bug in the way SA tests for availability of DCC, and also in the
way it handles errors when writing to dccproc.
Either install DCC, or create
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Justin R. Miller wrote:
Yeah, man spamassassin and have a look at the -P argument.
-P is implied with -t, so that's not the problem.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin + QmailScanner
Hello
I'm trying to use SpamAssassin 2.31 with my Mail Server, but seems
that something is wrong.
Some SpamAssassin features are not working. The worst problem of all
is that even when SA identifies a SPAM it doesn't add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Bart Schaefer on Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:26:37AM -0700:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Justin R. Miller wrote:
Yeah, man spamassassin and have a look at the -P argument.
-P is implied with -t, so that's not the problem.
Oops, my mistake. I was
As for modifying SA, I have already done it, (at least initially). I
just want help to modify it to allow the parameters to be in a central
config file.
A rule that says this ** and not ** means that I
need one for everything in between? The stars are also in the header,
for
How can I set spamassasin to allow html mail? I seem to get the raw
source instead. Believe it or not sometimes I actually like to see it.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 19:08, Steve Wingate wrote:
How can I set spamassasin to allow html mail? I seem to get the raw
source instead. Believe it or not sometimes I actually like to see it.
After actually reading the previous posts, I hereby rescind my previous
question.
Hello
I'm trying to use SpamAssassin 2.31 with my Mail Server, but seems
that something is wrong.
Some SpamAssassin features are not working. The worst problem of all
is that even when SA identifies a SPAM it doesn't add the
`*SPAM*` to the subject. Also... the spam_level_stars doesn't
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 12:16, Carlos Kumbak wrote:
Check out this:
--
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by cadeado by uid X with
qmail-scanner-1.12 (spamassassin: 2.40. . Clear:SA:1(14.2/5.0):. Processed
in 0.683329 secs); 14 Jul 2002 03:16:03 -
X-Spam-Status:
The idea here is to provide an easier way to create rules for the users
own email system (whether it be GroupWise/Outlook, etc.). Creating a
rule to put a message in a folder for ** SPAM - 10.2 ** is much harder
than ** SPAM - Likely **. It also lets me create that scale at my will
At 7/15/02 12:14 PM, Steven Stringham wrote:
The idea here is to provide an easier way to create rules for the users
own email system (whether it be GroupWise/Outlook, etc.). Creating a
rule to put a message in a folder for ** SPAM - 10.2 ** is much harder
than ** SPAM - Likely **. It also lets
Hey all,
We're running spamassassin on a test system via milter and getting some
flaky results. The system is RedHat 7.2, sendmail is 8.12.5, spamassassin
is 2.01 and 2.30(we've tried both, both have the same problem). The
spamassassin install is default except:
# cat local.cf
I am looking to filter my entire domain's email through SpamAssassin.
Sendmail + spamass-milter.
I am however, concerned with letting valid emails through (we are a Law
Firm). If I were to kill valid messages, there would be real problems.
The solution: Change the way it reports on the subject
The solution: Change the way it reports on the subject line, and let it
all through.
That's how I handle most of my stuff...
In PerMsgStatus.pm (which is where the subject line is changed) I am
adding two additional variables: _SPLV_ and _SPLG_.
Spamlevel = hits/threshold (so hits of 15
At 08:44 7/12/2002 -0700 Steven Stringham wrote:
I am looking to filter my entire domain's email through SpamAssassin.
Sendmail + spamass-milter.
I am however, concerned with letting valid emails through (we are a Law
Firm). If I were to kill valid messages, there would be real problems.
The
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
be release ready?
Good question. I haven't seen anything on the list about a planned 2.40
release date yet. Hopefully soon. :)
I'm sure we could live with that, too. G
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
be release ready?
Good question. I
Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versions are buggy. In the 2
weeks I was gone, have things settled down a
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 04:58:27AM -0700, Craig Hughes wrote:
Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versions
Hello,
I have setup and configured a spamassassin server on our network and so
far everything looks great. There is one thing I cannot figure out though.
It appears that when I put in the configuration rule
all_spam_to *@example.com
users at example.com are still getting their
Theo Van Dinter said:
Originally the statement was Razor2 support is a big change, we
should wait for 2.4, and now it's 2.4 will take a while, we should
release 2.32. The semi-software engineer in me says we should leave
2.3[1-9] as maintenance releases and wait for 2.40 for R2 support.
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
although I seem to recall some questions on the razor list about Razor
matching anything, and I haven't seen many hits in the past few days,
but I haven't had any time to investigate, myself :(
Well:
mysql select COUNT(*) from
mysql select COUNT(*) from reported where date '2002-06-26
00:00:00' and rules like
'%RAZOR_CHECK%';
Hey, cool. How did your reported spam end up in MySQL? Any chance you can
share the script that's doing that?
--
michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/
Be
Trey Keifer wrote:
I have setup and configured a spamassassin server on our network and so
far everything looks great. There is one thing I cannot figure out though.
It appears that when I put in the configuration rule
all_spam_to *@example.com
users at example.com are still
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:16:47PM -0600, Michael Moncur wrote:
Hey, cool. How did your reported spam end up in MySQL? Any chance you can
share the script that's doing that?
;) I just posted a message about it (under the high spam score
thread...) It's just some perl I threw together.
--
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:27:13PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
What, if anything, do I need to do to get it to check against the Razor
databases, as I'm under the impression that it is supposed to do?
It should just work. What does spamassassin -P -D message tell you?
Does it say Razor is
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:27:13PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
What, if anything, do I need to do to get it to check against the Razor
databases, as I'm under the impression that it is supposed to do?
It should just work. What does spamassassin
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:48:06PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
Razor Agents 2.08 is what's reporting when I do a razor-check. I believe
that's equivalent to Razor2, no?
Yes, that's Razor2, which is currently not supported by a released
SpamAssassin. (it's available via CVS...) Currently
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
be release ready?
Good question. I haven't seen anything on the list about a planned 2.40
release date yet. Hopefully soon. :)
--
Randomly Generated
Well, if you're autoreporting, I would agree. But we're agreeing that
you shouldn't autoreport. What we're disagreeing about is whether you
should report the spam after you verify that the message is in fact spam.
Ah... Somewhere along the way I took a turn into the weeds. Thanks
for
and it adds the message as spam for people who aren't
fortunate enough to use SA but use Razor instead.
But... If they wanted to use SA they would use SA. Since they are
not using SA when it is available to them but are using Razor it leads
me to believe that they do not want to use it.
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 11:11:04AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
But... If they wanted to use SA they would use SA. Since they are
You assume that people using SA or Razor do so by choice and/or are
technically savvy enough to set them up.
not using SA when it is available to them but are using
Hans Vallden wrote:
I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to
Mac OS X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so.
Heck, I might even pay some money for specific instructions.
http://rhumba.pair.com/ben/docs/sa.html
Rod, Tony, Ian and all other kind
So, then, if I'm supposed to only use spamassassin -r to manually report
spam, how in heaven's name do I use Razor, in conjunction with SA, to
check for spam?
If you have razor installed then spamassassin will automatically
detect that and use it. If it is not installed then it won't.
But... If they wanted to use SA they would use SA. Since they are
You assume that people using SA or Razor do so by choice and/or are
technically savvy enough to set them up.
By choice, yes. Your point about technically savvy is interesting
since I think both SA and Razor have similar
Hello all!
I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to
Mac OS X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so.
Heck, I might even pay some money for specific instructions.
--
--
Hans Vallden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 the voices made Hans Vallden write:
I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to Mac OS
X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so. Heck, I might
even pay some money for specific instructions.
I'd be surprised if this wasn't enough:
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 the voices made Tony L. Svanstrom write:
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 the voices made Hans Vallden write:
I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to Mac OS
X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so. Heck, I might
even pay some money for
I know people have accomplished this previously. Is there a general
consensus as to what is the best way to configure such a setup?
Install qmail with QMAILQUEUE patch, qmail-scanner, and spamassassin.
Add smtproutes to forward mail from your domain into your internal mail server. My
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:40:30AM -0500, McClung, Darren W. wrote:
I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
sendmail. Here is what I am trying to accomplish. I have a Linux firewall
that acts as a packet filter between the outside world and an internal
subnet
-Original Message-
From: McClung, Darren W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 16:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin with Exchange
I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
sendmail. Here is what I am trying
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 10:40, McClung, Darren W. wrote:
I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
sendmail. Here is what I am trying to accomplish. I have a Linux firewall
that acts as a packet filter between the outside world and an internal
subnet on a private
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:40:30AM -0500, McClung, Darren W. wrote:
Currently I have sendmail-8.12.4 built and functional on the
firewall, but I can't get it to both forward mail and send it through
spamassassin. I've tried building spamass-milter, but the make always fails
with
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
Now I see no reason why in real life one should accept such case. I'd
say that in real life I only accept connection from machine with valid
DNS and reverse DNS.
Sadly ISP's aren't as on-the-ball as you are. I've been trying for
months to get my ISP to setup
Now I see no reason why in real life one should accept such case. I'd
say that in real life I only accept connection from machine with
valid
DNS and reverse DNS.
While it would be nice in the real world to do this, many email
servers can ALREADY reject mail that does not have a reverse DNS
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Olivier Nicole wrote:
SA could do a reverse DNS check and mark this as very suspicious, but
on another hand, if expansionpack.xtdnet.nl is an internal mail
gateway only, why did it accept incoming message from 216.139.180.4,
expansionpack.xtdnet.nl is another ip number
I believe the only check that for instance sendmail could do, is to
check if a lookup of the ip gives the hostname, and if the hostname
lookup doesnt give the IP, then it can block the message. But in
real life, there are so many situations where this is not the case,
that blocking that scenario
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Olivier Nicole wrote:
I wonder how it happened actually. Only way would be that the machine
with 216.139.180.4 connected to your mail server and started the
dialog with HELO and your own mailserver name.
I think that would actually give (for sendmail) the apparently from
ON == Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ON I wonder how it happened actually. Only way would be that the machine
ON with 216.139.180.4 connected to your mail server and started the
ON dialog with HELO and your own mailserver name.
ON Now I see no reason why in real life one should
Olivier Nicole wrote:
I believe the only check that for instance sendmail could do, is to
check if a lookup of the ip gives the hostname, and if the hostname
lookup doesnt give the IP, then it can block the message. But in
real life, there are so many situations where this is not the case,
that
Hi,
Now I see no reason why in real life one should accept such case. I'd
say that in real life I only accept connection from machine with valid
DNS and reverse DNS.
Sadly ISP's aren't as on-the-ball as you are. I've been trying for
months to get my ISP to setup reverse DNS for
Hello Users,
Pardon me for joining the list with a question ;-)
I do run Exim-3.36 on FreeBSD and would like to run SA globally.
I have downloaded the latest version and put in in /usr/local/etc/Spamassassin.
The only decisions that I find difficult to make (because this is an ISP) are
as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Odhiambo Washington on Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:43:11PM +0300:
1. How do I model my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf? I do not want
to mess up the subject line so much though I have to. I am going to
setup a list (opt-in) for users who want
Wash --
...and then Odhiambo Washington said...
%
% Hello Users,
Hello!
%
...
% 1. How do I model my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?
%I do not want to mess up the subject line so much though I have to. I am
In addition to the instruction you've already seen to read the man page,
note
Jm's autoreply told me to mail it here :)
Paul
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:14:05 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SpamAssassin idea?
Hi,
I noticed that lately, spammers are using a trick to hide the
SA gurus:
I have several very old, and very spam ridden e-mail addresses which I am
trying to make spamtraps. I am running Sendmail and Procmail.
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin -r -w noreply
--
Kind Regards,
David A. Flanigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.flanigan.net
SA Gurus:
I have several old e-mail addresses which receive only spam (and allot of
it). So I would like to turn them into SpamTraps.
Following the instructions in the spamassassin man page I tried the
following in aliases:
spamtrap: |/usr/bin/spamassassin -r -w spamtrap
The
DF == David Flanigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DF I have several very old, and very spam ridden e-mail addresses which I am
DF trying to make spamtraps. I am running Sendmail and Procmail.
Why use procmail at all? Just delete the account associated with it
and make an alias, or forward the
701 - 800 of 902 matches
Mail list logo
