AIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vic Cekvenich
> Sent: September 27, 2003 9:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Extending Standard Tags was Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
>
>
> Steve Raeburn wrote:
> > Many of the tags (basically those that have been imple
Steve Raeburn wrote:
Many of the tags (basically those that have been implemented in struts-el)
are closely bound to Struts so I don't see that they belong anywhere else.
(Separate jar, yes. Separate cvs dir, probably). The remaining tags have a
limited shelf life, having been superseded by JSTL.
Steve Raeburn wrote:
> While I'd probably be in favour of Struts becoming a top level
> project, I must confess I don't quite understand the criteria for
> becoming one.
It's mainly a question of whether the community surrounding the product
is mature enough to stand on its own and stay true to th
L PROTECTED]
> Sent: September 27, 2003 10:20 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Extending Standard Tags was Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> Vic Cekvenich wrote:
> > (also IMO Struts HTML and tiles tag could/should migrate to taglibs)
>
> Yes, it wou
Vic Cekvenich wrote:
(also IMO Struts HTML and tiles tag could/should migrate to taglibs)
Yes, it would be nice if the taglibs were maintained by Jakarta Taglibs,
in the same way that the Struts View Tools are maintained by Velocity.
Struts should make it as easy as possible for presentation tech
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
If my other
suggestion of having the render() method call getters instead of directly
accessing instance variables is used, then renderExtraAttributes() becomes
more important. If it is not provided and someone wants to stick in some
non-HTML 4.01 compliant HTML, what they
Edgar P Dollin wrote:
1) It is fine that the basic tags in struts don't emit non-standard html,
but why do struts tags have to 'police' the emission of non-html. For many
intranet style projects, non standard html is important to achieve specific
required functionality. To deny the need for such
to see a more detailed description of what you're thinking
about to know whether it would fit in, but I assume you're talking about
something more than the "disabled" and "readonly" attributes that
already exist?
Edgar
Craig
-Original Message-
In the beginning, there was no Jakarta Taglibs, or inkling of something
like JSTL. So, Craig bravely put together a useful implementation of
some custom tags that did two things. First, they exposed the internals
of the Struts Controller framework. Second, they provided some basic
functionality
- Original Message -
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
> --- Robert Leland <[EMAIL
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Of course if I really want that I should probably just use
Velocity, huh? ;)
+1. I do =:)
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Editable Fields
k to
support. Ted has mentioned something similar to this before.
David
>
> Edgar
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:07 PM
> > To: Struts Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Edi
- Original Message -
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
> > However, at this time, we have a Struts-el tag
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Gastin wrote:
> > As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well
> > beaten. Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a
> > political topic in the Struts community.
>
> There was a time when we were encourag
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:07 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> David Graham wrote:
> > There are 3 things that earn my -1 on tag enhancements:
> > 1. Fun
David Graham wrote:
There are 3 things that earn my -1 on tag enhancements:
1. Functionality already provided by the JSTL.
Just as an aside, I believe by -1 David means that he won't volunteer
his own time to the issue. As a volunteer, this is his absolute right.
But, since the Struts minimum pl
Chris Gastin wrote:
> As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well
> beaten. Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a
> political topic in the Struts community.
There was a time when we were encouraging people to use the JSTL, and
there was a political bent
--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Graham wrote:
>
> >--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't
> >>find
> >>it.
> >>
> >>How about two simple changes:
> >>1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes()
ham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:39 PM
> Subject: RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> >
> > --- Edgar P Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > &
Chris Gastin wrote:
Rob:
I am not an contributer, but I am a young developer. I am willing to step up
and support these abilities in the struts tags
Great !
I have come to believe that young/single developers & older/grown
kids/empty nesters developers are better
situated to be Open Source dev
nt: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
> David Graham wrote:
>
> >--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and could
David Graham wrote:
--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't
find
it.
How about two simple changes:
1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes() method that gives people the chance
to
throw non-standard HTML into their tags that
Sounds good. I'll put some thought into it.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static T
pers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:39 PM
> Subject: RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> >
> > --- Edgar P Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think it is more than a 'preference' based on the
m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
> --- Edgar P Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think it is more than a 'prefere
rs
functionality not provided by the JSTL; however, if other tags need
refactoring I'm willing to work on those as well.
Does this sound reasonable?
David
>
> Niall
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts
advance if this has been discussed before. ([OT] I
> really
> wish there was an easier way to search the archives. I have resorted to
> googling them, but it's still a pain.)
>
> Matt
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to
googling them, but it's still a pain.)
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
to
googling them, but it's still a pain.)
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:39 PM
Subject: RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
> Whenever tag extendability enhancements are discussed, we always hear
> complaints from a vocal minority but
n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:23 PM
> > To: Struts Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
> >
> >
> > It's only a "political football" in the sense that most of
> > the curr
lanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:23 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> It's only a "political football" in the sense that most of
> the current
> committers would prefer
Edgar P Dollin wrote:
If the tags were structured differently so they were easier to extend
without breaking when new releases of struts come out these issues might not
come up. Of course, I myself have resigned myself to this issue since the
tags are such a political football on this list.
Edgar
Edgar P Dollin wrote:
If the tags were structured differently so they were easier to extend
without breaking when new releases of struts come out these issues might not
come up. Of course, I myself have resigned myself to this issue since the
tags are such a political football on this list.
Edgar
David Graham wrote:
--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts
tags.
I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it,
though other committers might not
--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
> and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts
> tags.
>
> I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it,
> though other committers might not.
>
> The
D]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> > Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
> > and probably has been implem
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Has anyone ever discussed adding a general-purpose "attributes" attribute to
the tag library to support non-standard HTML like this? For example,
Yes, it was vetoed by several committers. Search the archives.
--
nal Message-
> From: Robert Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:23 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3
> years, and probably h
t...
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
> Yes, This has been brought up many times o
Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts tags.
I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it,
though other committers might not.
The key argument against it is that it would transform the html tag
:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> Has anyone considered a feature which toggles between an
> editable form element and read only text / static text.
>
> I find myself developing JSPs where depending on the Use
> Case
Has anyone considered a feature which toggles between an editable form
element and read only text / static text.
I find myself developing JSPs where depending on the Use Case "fieldA"
could be an editalbe text box () in Use Case 1 on xyz.jsp and readonly text /static text in Use Case 2
(My Text
44 matches
Mail list logo