Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 8:55 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Struts Validator and Select boxes
Posting whats in your validation.xml for the form and the bit of your jsp
with your select fields would be helpfull.
If you
Posting whats in your validation.xml for the form and the bit of your jsp
with your select fields would be helpfull.
If you take the "fromDay" as an example, you are using
field.getVarValue("fromDay") - if you don't have a "var" defined in your
validation.xml for "fromDay" then that would cause t
Any help/takers ?
-Original Message-
From: Janarthan Sathiamurthy
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 10:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Struts Validator and Select boxes
Hi,
I am using Struts validator.
One page of mine has dates displayed as "MM" "DD" "".
All the above 3 are dis
Hi,
This is a good one to get started -
http://weblogtoolscollection.com/regex/regex.php
Best Regards,
Janarthan S
-Original Message-
From: Joao Batistella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 12:03 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: Struts validator Regular
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 6:52 PM
Subject: RE: Struts validator Regular Expressions
don't quote me but the javadocs for jakarta's regular expression's RE class
are ok.
Also I believe ever
Hi,
this should be very close to \d{1,3}[.]\d{1,3}[.]\d{1,3}[.]\d{1,3}
I need to validate an IP address and I don't know how is the syntax in the
validator config file.
take your time to study this:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/extra/regex/
It's worth the trouble, regex rox !
don't quote me but the javadocs for jakarta's regular expression's RE class are ok.
Also I believe everything is based on jakarta's oro.
sandeep
-Original Message-
From: Joao Batistella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 1:33 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subj
Whats missing from your question is how are you identifying which "client" a
user belongs to?
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:09 PM
Subject: Struts Validator
Hi there,
I am new to Struts and t
March 15, 2004 9:38 PM
Subject: RE: Struts Validator prints all javascript functions
Hi Guys !
Does anyone think that this could be happening because I am using Tiles ?
Kunal
-Original Message-
From: Kunal H. Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 15 March 2004 10:12
To: '
Hi Guys !
Does anyone think that this could be happening because I am using Tiles ?
Kunal
-Original Message-
From: Kunal H. Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 15 March 2004 10:12
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Struts Validator prints all javascript
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marino A. Jonsson
Sent: Monday, 15 March 2004 10:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Struts Validator prints all javascript functions
hmm ... that's not my experience - the dynamic parts are rendered as they
should, but all the static javascript is then rendere
hmm ... that's not my experience - the dynamic parts are rendered as they
should, but all the static javascript is then rendered too (instead of just
the relevant static methods). I haven't tested 1.2 though.
Marino
"Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At
At 8:55 AM +1100 3/15/04, Kunal H. Parikh wrote:
Hi All!
I am attempting to use Struts Validator.
All works well, but I am only using the "required" validation in my code.
However, the JavaScript that gets generated, include other functions like
checkEmail, minLength, etc. etc.
Is this expected
They are in two places, the struts specific validator files are in the
struts.jar - but validator is a commons component and its class files are in
commons-validator.jar.
Everything is shipped with the struts binary - look in the lib folder.
- Original Message -
From: "Ramachandran" <[EM
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 2004 January 14 21.57
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: Struts Validator overriding cache-control?
> >
> >
> > The sequence you described is the expected behavior.
> > Comments below.
> >
>
t: 2004 January 14 21.57
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Struts Validator overriding cache-control?
>
>
> The sequence you described is the expected behavior.
> Comments below.
>
> --- "Brown, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
The sequence you described is the expected behavior.
Comments below.
--- "Brown, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have encountered a situation wherein it appears that the server-side
> validation provided by the struts-validator and that of
> ValidatorForm.validate(...) appears to be overrid
BDY.RTF
Description: RTF file
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ValidatorForm and ValidatorActionForm should be subclassed if you are not
using dynamica forms
and you want to leverage the Struts Validation framework.
robert
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Dirksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTE
Change the type of date type to java.sql.Date you won't get that
exception. This is because the Beanutils which they use to copy the data
form request to form is not having a corresponding converter to convert
to java.util.Date but it has a converter to convert to sql date
Thanks
Karuna
-Ori
BDY.RTF
Description: RTF file
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Struts site. Its
late and I know I must be staring at the issue and just not realizing it.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: David Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 11:09 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Struts &
Two questions immediately come to mind from what you documented:
1. Does com.hp.ipg.ne.pgpm.forms.orgForm extend
org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorForm
or
org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorActionForm
2. The 'input="org_edit.jsp" is context sensitive. Can you
reach org_edit.jsp from the sam
Vijay,
Thanks for your answer.
I tried what you suggested, with no success. I get an exception saying
that the getter method is not found :
java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: Property 'parameter' has no getter
method
at
org.apache.commons.beanutils.PropertyUtils.getSimpleProperty(PropertyUtils.jav
Hi Frederic,
I thing in validation.xml u must provide your setting as
You have specified it as
indexedListProperty="parameters"
Plz Verify your validation.xml.
-Vijay
Frederic Dernbach wrote:
I would like to know how to use the Struts Validator with indexed
properties.
I cannot displa
om: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: Struts Validator and Hidden Field
I was wondering if it is possible to validate a hidden field using the
Str
Octavia wrote:
> I have tried to validate it as any other input field, but have not had any
luck.
> Any suggestions/ideas? Thanks much!
You'll have to post some of your code before anyone will have any idea why
it's not working.
The Validator also logs copious amounts of info, you should be able
, but have not had any
luck. Any suggestions/ideas? Thanks much!
- Original Message -
From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: Struts Valida
> I was wondering if it is possible to validate a hidden field using the
> Struts Validator framework. If so, an example would be extremely helpful.
Validator is a separate project in the Jakarta Commons, it's not part of
Struts proper.
Sure you could validate a hidden field, but what's the po
As far as I was aware validating a hidden field is the exact same as
validating any other field.. just make sure the name of the field in your
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:13 PM
Subject: Struts Validator and Hidden Field
Hi Everyone,
I was wondering if it is possibl
I'm not familiar with the use of double quotes in regexes. However, you
seem to have the right idea. Instead of quotes, try using \\ in place
of each \ you want to match. E.g.:
^\\(\\[A-Za-z0-0_-]+)+\\?$
Quick explanation
\\ - Must start with a single backslash
(\\[A-Za-z0-0_-]+) - A patt
ECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 5:40 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Struts Validator Javascript
> ... Am I so special :)
;-)
If I remember it well, it's an open issue in the bug-list.
cheers Reinhard
Sorry, I'd like to help you. But I don't quite understand what you are asking.
What is "I have codeId (0n) n varies"? If you want to know if you can
validate indexed properties, the answer is Yes.
See requireiif example on:
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/dev_validator.htm
Hi! Didn't get a chance to check the newsgroup until now.
Try:
-Original Message-
From: Gandle, Panchasheel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 11, 2003 1:33 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Struts Validator for map backed beans
> > You offered this to the OS community with insufficient
> > documentation.
>
> Yeah, that's what open source is all about.
The hell it is.
If it was, OS would still be something geeks twiddle
on their own time while earning food money working
with software that is properly documented.
You
, please give it a rest.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 13, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: Struts Validator
>
>
> Validator is crap; don't waste your time.
>
&g
).
Failing that, why not write something yourself and donate it so we can call
your hard work crap?
Otherwise, please give it a rest.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 13, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing
In the validation.xml file I believe that the validator takes
as validate based on form name and
as validate based on the action name.
Meaning that if the validator "sees" a formbean with the first examples name
it does validation and then if it "sees" an action with same name as the
second
lease give it a rest.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 13, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: Struts Validator
>
>
> Validator is crap; don't waste your time.
>
&
--Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:02 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts Validator
Time to put up or shut up, Mark. If there are specific bugs you have
encountered with Validator, please report them via Bugzil
PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts Validator
> Validator is crap; don't waste your time.
Don't mind Mark, he's perpetually waking up on the wrong side of the bed.
Validator is actually one of the coolest features of Struts and combined
with DyanActionForms r
I've included an example of the Two Fields custom validator in the examples
at http://www.ninsky.com/struts/
The bundled struts examples are found in the webapps directory of the struts
distribution (struts-validator.war).
There's lots of good stuff in that directory ;-)
Steve
---
David Graham wrote:
I suspect that not too much has changed since the version that shipped
with
Struts 1.1.
A great deal of internal cleanup has happened in commons-validator since
its 1.0.2 release as well as new features and a more extensible
definition. I think Rob Leland is planning on
It's not in Struts 1.1 but it's available in the nightly build and will be
in the next release.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 14, 2003 8:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Struts Validator-validwhen
>
>
>
> Hi,
> The st
, why not write something yourself and donate it so we can call
your hard work crap?
Otherwise, please give it a rest.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 13, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>
ychi.org/bof/struts
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 8:41 AM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: Struts Validator-validwhen
> >
> >
> > It's not
iling List
Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Struts Validator
Just threaten to repost [Mark's] String.length() versus array.length
mixup.
That ought to quiet him down for a while... :)
-jeff
On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 05:55 PM, Micael wrote:
I don't know about the rest of you, but I have foun
beans
validator with multiple
input fields in an array...
Thanks
Panchasheel
-Original Message-
From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:47 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Struts Validator for map backed beans
Hi! Didn't g
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:02 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Struts Validator
>
>
> Time to put up or shut up, Mark. If there are specific bugs you have
> encountered with Validator, please report them via Bugzilla so t
> Validator is crap; don't waste your time.
Don't mind Mark, he's perpetually waking up on the wrong side of the bed.
Validator is actually one of the coolest features of Struts and combined
with DyanActionForms reduces form coding time significantly. I don't
think Mark ever got it working but i
Thanks Shane, that fixed it.
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Shane C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 August 2003 16:41
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Struts Validator
In the validation.xml file I believe that the validator takes
as validate based on for
t: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 7:30 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Struts Validator
>
>
> Let me state the blindingly obvious:
>
> 1. Validator works. Other people seem to be able to use it.
> 2. Validator is not perfect. Valid bug reports would help
&
so, that's back in the
> >nightly build and will be in the next release.
>
> Cool. :-)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 August 2003 15:47
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Str
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
I like the concept of the validator, but personally I don't have a lot of
confidence in it.
that's a bit harsh. I think as long as you know what it does and doesn't
do, there's every reason to have confidence in it. It's an excellent
package that will benefit even more when
Wow! That was impressive. Now I know why Validator sucks.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:52 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Struts Validator
Get a life, Mark.
> You offered this to the
*ouch* that's harsh, man...really harsh. :-)~
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kyser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 7:21 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [OT] RE: Struts Validator
Just threaten to repost [Mark's] String.lengt
I like the concept of the validator, but personally I don't have a lot of
confidence in it. The second thing I tried to do with it was use the
inRange (or whatever) test, and it didn't work. I use it server-side and
only for required fields.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Erez Efrati"
t 2003 14:06
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Struts Validator
+1 - Validator works. I started using it wy back in the pre-RC1
days.
Everytime that Validator hasn't worked for me, I've found that it was
due to
a screw up on my par
Mark Galbreath wrote:
I am not looking for a war here. All I ask is to get the damn thing right
before offering it as a release to our community.
Release early, release often.
Most open source software would -never- get released if people waited
till they got the damn thing right before offer
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:01 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Struts Validator-nextreleasewhen (was validwhen)
>
>
> > I suspect that not too much has changed since
> ... Am I so special :)
;-)
If I remember it well, it's an open issue in the bug-list.
cheers Reinhard
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;s pretty easy to filter you out.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 13, 2003 3:17 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Struts Validator
>
>
> Dave,
>
> My only compla
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 14, 2003 6:29 AM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: Struts Validator
>
>
> +1 for it works for me too.
> Not knowing javascript well, using the valida
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 10, 2003 9:42 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Struts Validator Javascript
>
>
> Sgarlata Matt wrote:
> > I like the concept of the validator, but pers
You can reach Bugzilla at:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Erez Efrati" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 1
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:41:32 +0200
> From: Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Struts Validator J
Validator is crap; don't waste your time.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Struts Validator
Has anyone had any problems getting the Struts Validator to work?
I have a small
to use the validator.
>requiredif is in 1.1. Do you mean validwhen? If so, that's back in the
>nightly build and will be in the next release.
Cool. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 August 2003 15:47
To: Struts Use
m: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 13, 2003 5:40 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Struts Validator
>
>
Just look at the archive for this list and
> I'll wager there
> are more questions/complaints abo
the damn thing right
before offering it as a release to our community.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:45 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts Validator
--- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Cheers David,
I'll take a look
Brian
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 August 2003 16:14
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts Validator
--- Brian McSweeney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> >Have y
r Blvd.
> Lenexa, KS 66219
> (913) 577-1496
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 7:30 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: S
t the setup step it's *far*
easier to use the Validator and supplement it with custom coding when
needed.
David
>
> Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:50 PM
> To: Strut
o whether plans to move
towards a dot release are imminent or not even on the horizon.
-Van
Mike Van Riper
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.baychi.org/bof/struts
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 8:41 AM
.
>requiredif is in 1.1. Do you mean validwhen? If so, that's back in the
>nightly build and will be in the next release.
Cool. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 August 2003 15:47
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts
> Keep investigating the problem. If you can come up with new information
> or a
> patch, then that will serve as a much more useful reminder than just
> repeating yourself.
I couldn't agree more with this statement. Many reported bugs are poorly
described and just left in bugzilla for someone el
I suggest you write your own JavaScript validations; Validator has many
problems.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: sriram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:34 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Struts Validator Errors - urgent!!
H i, This is a repost. I'm in need
Hi Nagendra, and thanks for your suggestion !
That "kinda" worked...
Using
datePatternStrict
dd.MM.
resulted in the datefield being correctly validated to the dd.MM. format, but I
would also like it to allow both these formats of date :
08.1
hi,
use this syntax
datePatternStrict
dd/MM/
-nagi
---Original Message---
From: Struts Users Mailing
List
Date: Wednesday
; Chuck
>
>
> >
> > From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2003/06/05 Thu AM 09:50:08 EDT
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: struts validator
> >
> > >Not sure all this talk of validator is that justifiable. I
gt; Date: 2003/06/05 Thu AM 09:50:08 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: struts validator
>
> >Not sure all this talk of validator is that justifiable. I've had no
> >issues generating both the client side and server side validation, and its
> >saved me a
o: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: struts validator
Like I said, I dont use client-side, and its been pretty smooth sailing
for
me. Sorry your experience was different, but personally, I like it.
Especially defining constants for validation masks and using them over
and
over on lots of
McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 June 2003 10:50
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: struts validator
I had initial trouble setting up the validator, mainly to do with it not
working when you try to validate the dtd with a machine not connected
to the net. It didn't give a good
Struts Studio - IDE for Struts
http://www.exadel.com/strutsStudio
-
- Original Message -
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:32 PM
Subject: RE: struts validator
003 12:03 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: struts validator
Like I said, I dont use client-side, and its been pretty smooth
sailing for
me. Sorry your experience was different, but personally, I like it.
Especially defining constants for validation masks and using them
over and
ED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:00 AM
Subject: RE: struts validator
> hi,
> Can you please let me know of how do you get rid of this issuse ( i
> mean setting up the validator so that i need not be
> connected to the net ) ...
>
> Thanks
> Guru
>
> -Origin
Brian
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark Galbreath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 5:18 AM
> Subject: RE: struts validator
>
> > You know, I just d
Mailing List
Subject: Re: struts validator
I had initial trouble setting up the validator, mainly to do with it not
working when you try to validate the dtd with a machine not connected
to the net. It didn't give a good error explaining this. However, once I
realised this was the problem, an
eally well. Especially, if, like me, you are new to javascript!
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Galbreath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 5:18 AM
Subject: RE: struts
Mark Galbreath wrote:
> You know, I just don't get it. I think Validator was a great idea that
> simply proved wrong in implementation. And I know I am not alone it
> this assessment.
I've been using the Validator for about two and half years now, and I
have to agree, that it does seem to be fini
ementation. And I know I am not alone it
this
assessment.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kyser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:03 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: struts validator
Like I said, I dont use client-side, and its been pretty smooth
sail
iling List
Subject: Re: struts validator
Like I said, I dont use client-side, and its been pretty smooth sailing for
me. Sorry your experience was different, but personally, I like it.
Especially defining constants for validation masks and using them over and
over on lots of different for
Guzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:55 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List; Mark Galbreath
> Subject: Re: struts validator
>
>
> how can i fix it?
>
> On Friday 30 May 2003 08:20 pm, Mark Galbreath wrote:
>> That's because the Vali
raham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:32 PM
Subject: RE: struts validator
> >Beats me, dude. I struggled with it for 3 days and said enough is
enough,
> >and wrote my own validations in my Action classes. If you look throu
t not others" is not very helpful.
David
Good luck,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Frances Aleah Z. de Guzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:55 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; Mark Galbreath
Subject: Re: struts validator
how can i fix it?
On Friday 30 May
; > From: Frances Aleah Z. de Guzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:55 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List; Mark Galbreath
> > Subject: Re: struts validator
> >
> >
> > how can i fix it?
> >
> > On Friday 30 M
PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; Mark Galbreath
Subject: Re: struts validator
how can i fix it?
On Friday 30 May 2003 08:20 pm, Mark Galbreath wrote:
That's because the Validator works by magic and you obviously have a
hex in your machine.
(sometimes I kill myself)
Mark
-Original Message
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Frances Aleah Z. de Guzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:55 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; Mark Galbreath
Subject: Re: struts validator
how can i fix it?
On Friday 30 May 2003 08:20 pm, Mark Galbreath wrote:
> That's because
I assume you have javascript enabled on your browser?
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 07:54 PM, Frances Aleah Z. de Guzman
wrote:
how can i fix it?
On Friday 30 May 2003 08:20 pm, Mark Galbreath wrote:
That's because the Validator works by magic and you obviously have a
hex in
your machine.
(
how can i fix it?
On Friday 30 May 2003 08:20 pm, Mark Galbreath wrote:
> That's because the Validator works by magic and you obviously have a hex in
> your machine.
>
> (sometimes I kill myself)
> Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Frances Aleah Z. de Guzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
