> >With oil prices at an all-time high and Big Oil
> >reporting record profits this year has been exceptional.
>
>
> Am I missing something? If prices for a raw input go up then the sale price
> also goes up. However, provided the prices go up at near the same rate of
> the inputs then profi
Mr. Hubbert obviously did not understand Mr. Joseph Newman's Gyroscopic
Particle Theory. If he did, he would confirm Big Oil's contention that
there is a near infinite supply. ;)
T
(ducking)
On 3/30/05 8:57 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In the 1950s, a petroleum geolog
Some past gleanings from the Bioenergy List
Bioenergy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/
"Oil Production -- According to the oil map on page 56, May 2000
Popular Science, world oil production will be down to half of what
it is now by 2015. From there it just keeps goin
Hubbert was not a petroleum geologist, he was a mathematician
and university professor in mathematics. He presented mathematical
methods to calculate the depletion of any finite resource. In the
70's directly after the 1973 crises, he got the job from the
US Parliament to calculate the petroleum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marion_King_Hubbert
Hubbert was born in San Saba, Texas in 1903. He attended the University
of Chicago, where he received his B.S. in 1926, his M.S. in 1928, and
his Ph.D in 1937, studying geology, mathematics, and physics. He worked
as an assistant geologist
this morning) ok that was two.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 30 March, 2005 2:51 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
>With oil prices at an all-time high and Big Oil
>reporting record profits this year has b
o anything (in
this petro case permit their government to launch an immoral, recently
ahistorical, pre-emptive war) to get their fix.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/30/05 6:51 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
> >With
Bob,
I stand corrected and the only excuse I have, is that I only brought
forward a mistake that I read earlier. I remember that it was an article
about the hearings in US congress in mid 70'. Will however not do this
mistake again, but do not despair, there are many others I will do and
sur
ing power they will
> continue as is. Just as the street drug dealer knows
> his addicts, get em
> hooked cheaply then slowly raise the price until
> they'll do anything (in
> this petro case permit their government to launch an
> immoral, recently
> ahistorical, pre-emptive wa
from hearing about his work many years ago)
Hakan Falk wrote:
Bob,
I stand corrected and the only excuse I have, is that I only brought
forward a mistake that I read earlier. I remember that it was an article
about the hearings in US congress in mid 70'. Will however not do this
mistake ag
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains why president Carter was so genuinely
worried, when he developed his energy plan. He had the
foresight to realize that Hubbert was right.
It also explains
: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also
All of this supported by the America people, in a reelection
of president Bush. I hear the false argument that only 48%
voted him in office. This argument is poor mathematics, I
cannot get to this result, when Bush won with a more than
3 million of the populous American vote. It was the first
PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains why president Carter was so genuinely
worried, when he developed his energy plan. He had the
: robert luis rabello
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/1/05 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hakan Falk wrote:
> All of this supported by the America people, in a reelection
> of president Bush. I hear the false argument that only 48%
> voted him in office. This
gs. The suffering of soldiers was not their overriding concern.
The top concerns of the Bush and Clinton Administrations were to
protect perceived U.S. interests in the Middle East, and to ensure
that American corporations still had healthy balance sheets.
William Blum is the author of "Killing
;Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains
ler for the same reason, Him and Suddam Hussein were weapons
of mass destruction.
H.
- Original Message -
From: "Hakan Falk"
To:
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
>
> Bob,
>
> You were right and I am wrong and
nation.
Sincerely and humbly,
Tom Irwin
-Original Message-
From: robert luis rabello
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/1/05 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hakan Falk wrote:
> All of this supported by the America people, in a reelection
> of president Bush
: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 01 April, 2005 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Henri Naths wrote:
Hakan,
I would like to give a humble option here,
( Hakan wrote;...Criminal, established by the fact that we no
Hakan,
I am stunned almost beyond the point of being able to write this
response. I say stunned because I think that for the first time, I
actually agree with you. I doubt it will happen too often, if ever
again, but as for this post, I can find no reason to disagree.
Like it or not, the Canad
to 1925; Panama,
1903-1914, and Haiti, 1915 to 1934.
And so on.
From:
http://members.aol.com/bblum6/parenti.htm
Against Empire
by Michael Parenti
Chapter 3: Intervention: Whose gain? Whose pain?
Best wishes
Keith
- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Addison"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
I wrote;
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Naths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 01 April, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Keith,
I think it is quite irrelevant who sold what to whom, Hypothetically,I
hav
Robert,
I did not misunderstood, I earlier said that after
this election the argument of that he was not
representative for US is not valid. This is what
democracy is all about. He is elected now and
he represent USA. The ones who do not agree
should accept and support US, at least in
theory.
P
hing to do with the
bombings. The suffering of soldiers was not their overriding concern.
The top concerns of the Bush and Clinton Administrations were to
protect perceived U.S. interests in the Middle East, and to ensure
that American corporations still had healthy balance sheets.
William B
ally correct.
H.
ps it's not perfect and it never will be... stop sniveling.
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 01 April, 2005 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
>Keith
Antifossil,
Of course you cannot agree with my earlier postings.
You have not even read them, because if you had done
that?
THEN YOU WOULD KNOW THAT I AM SWEDISH
AND LIVE IN SPAIN: LOL
Thanks anyway, because I thought that my English is
so bad, that it exclude the possibility that I was Americ
e fact that we now know that
Iraq were no WMD threat to US. )
We took out Hitler for the same reason, Him and Suddam Hussein were
weapons
of mass destruction.
H.
- Original Message -
From: "Hakan Falk"
To:
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch
Hakan
Of course I read your posts. The misunderstanding is all yours this time my
friend, I assure you. However, the one whose English (at least as far as
writing skills go) is so bad, is clearly me.
The first paragraph of that last post was directed to you Hakan. The rest of
that post was n
Hi All,
Correct me if I am wrong but I believe President Carter was the only
President to be an engineer. I recall him as having a degree in nuclear
engineering? True? He is also a great humanitarian.
Here's a quote from the "World's Finest Navy" site:
When Admiral Hyman G. Rickover (then
Robert,
I did not misunderstood, I earlier said that after
this election the argument of that he was not
representative for US is not valid. This is what
democracy is all about. He is elected now and
he represent USA.
Sigh. . . On this we agree.
The ones who do not agree
should a
eith Addison"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 01 April, 2005 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
>Keith,
I think it is quite irrelevant who sold what to whom,
Even if the very same people who sold them then accuse those same
I mention
to folks to go back and read Huxley and Orwell. We«re living in their world.
They just didn«t get the date right.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Henri Naths
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/04/05 16:37
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Keith,
I think it is
Sorry, but I live in Texas and your English is so much better than the
average of what I hear, that you must be a foreigner
Bright Blessings,
Kim
At 06:34 PM 4/1/2005, you wrote:
Thanks anyway, because I thought that my English is
so bad, that it exclude the possibility that I was Americ
.
- Original Message -
From: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could
What sealed Saddam's fate was him converting to the Euro as Iraq's Oil
Reserve Currency in November 2000. UN weapons inspectors were inside Iraq
and about to certify Iraq as WMD-Free. Since 97% of all his WMD's were
destroyed in the first weapons inspections before the inspectors were
ordered ou
CTED]>
Sent: 31 March, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
You were right and I am wrong and I am glad that I did get
a very good explanation on how Hubbert could be so right.
It also explains why president Carter was so genuinely
worried, when he devel
asn't about
Iraq
as a military threat in the region - the U.S. and U.K. were flying military and
surveillance over the country *daily* prior to the invasion. It wasn't about
Al-
Qaeda - they despised Saddam. Hussein did not attack or threaten the U.S.
So, Henri, in your opinion, why ha
Dear Hakan,
You are, of course, correct as far as the fighting in Europe. The
Soviet Union fielded some 540 divisions to the German 250+ and the US
87. By the time of the Normandy invasion Germany had lost. The
critical battles of the war were arguably Stalingrad, Kursk, Karkov, and
perh
Rick,
I would never want to play down the logistical support from US, it was
absolutely crucial for the outcome of WWII. Regardless the later commercial
and economical benefits for US. I will never try to play down the
importance of the Marshal plan from US, which was a more intelligent way o
sions meet the CARB guidelines,
and I am closer to making biodiesel. My Prius meets my needs for now, but I
don't plan to convert it to biodiesel any time soon!
>
> From: "Henri Naths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/03/31 Thu AM 10:45:45 EST
> To: <[E
I wonder what he's talking about...
Keith
I wrote;
- Original Message - From: "Henri Naths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 01 April, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Keith,
I think it is quite irrel
Hakan, you are not well informed.
World War II killed and missing
...armed forces K&M... total population of country
Australia26,976.6 million
New Zealand..11,625.2 million
Canada...42,04211 million
d in Britain for so long, well
after the end of the war.
Regards
Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 April 2005 01:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
I'm not too up on the history either. I do know that militqry
equipment was provided on lend-lease, which meant that if it was still
around after the war, the Brits had to give it back.
So a month or so after V-J day, the U.S. under the influence of Congress
said "OK, time's up, give it back." So
Doug,
The number you give is WWII losses, I was talking about the
European part of WWII. This because we talked about taking
out Hitler. US lost several times more in the Pacific, than they
did in Europe. Otherwise I find your number interesting and I have
seen them before.
As Darryl pointed ou
Hello Hakan,
(snip)
> The number you give is WWII losses, I was talking about the
> European part of WWII. This because we talked about taking
> out Hitler. US lost several times more in the Pacific, than they
> did in Europe.
With respect, the total allied losses under General
M
Bob,
Even those numbers are sub number and does not say anything. It is
possible that my source was wrong, but do not give me number who
says nothing to that effect. If my source is right and US losses were
10% of allies total, around 10,000 US soldiers died in the Battle of
Bulge. It is also so
the contrary I would be very pleased to hear them, and
of course the source.
Regards,
Bob.
- Original Message -
From: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy
quot;Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
>
> Bob,
>
> Even those numbers are sub number and does not say anything. It is
> possible that my sou
know.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: bmolloy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/4/05 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hello Hakan,
Again with respect, it is not "well known" that the
Pacific losses in WW2 were great
-
From: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Bob,
Even those numbers are sub number and does not say anything. It is
possible that my source
The US involvement in the fighting in Europe
was not pivotal to the outcome.
Clearly any good student of history knows that US losses in Europe
during WWII were completely drawfed by those of Germany and Russian, but
to claim that US involvement in the fighting in Europe was not pivotal
to
The US involvement in the fighting in Europe
was not pivotal to the outcome.
Clearly any good student of history knows that US losses in Europe
during WWII were completely drawfed by those of Germany and Russian, but
to claim that US involvement in the fighting in Europe was not pivotal
to
Whether or not the US took Rome or invaded in 1944 the war was lost for
Germany. They could no longer replace their losses while the Soviet
ability to put in men and material into the field was steadily rising.
The German army was essentially an army within an army. A small, highly
mobil
under Eisenhower.
Regards,
Bob.
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Littrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
> Dear Bob,
>
> With respect to
many times fewer than in the European theatre under Eisenhower.
> Regards,
> Bob.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rick Littrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re:
t; From: "Rick Littrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
>
> > Dear Bob,
> >
> > With respect to the US contribution to the
c campaign under General MacArthur as supreme commander
> > > were many times fewer than in the European theatre under Eisenhower.
> > > Regards,
> > > Bob.
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Rick Littrell" <[EM
Henri Naths
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hakan,
I would like to give a humble option here,
( Hakan wrote;...Criminal, established by the fact that we now know that
Iraq were no WMD threat to US. )
We took out
y not the US.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Henri Naths
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come
Hakan,
I would like to give a humble option here,
( Hak
This is great ... finally we are making sense. The WMD is not the issue.
This is what I have said all along. People miss the big picture. Suddam
Hussein was the weapon of mass destruction. 100% agreed.
KS
Only two problems with that:
a) Iraq was a sovereign nation. We do not have the right, e
Sheesh
In fact I posted a reply saying it was lethal nonsense:
Sigh...
I suppose one man's sense is another man's idiocy, and to each his
own and all that, all jolly good and well... But in fact it's a
matter of what you support, what you go along with, what you accept
wihout question
John, I agree with what you say, but I did NOT write that!!!
Sheesh
Oops. Very sorry Keith. I know you didn't write that. That's what I get
for hastily replying while I'm waiting for the coffee to finish brewing.
Again. Sorry about that.
jh
___
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come(Finally an eye is
opening)
>This is great ... finally we are making sense. The WMD is not the issue.
>This is what I have said all along. People miss the big picture. Suddam
>Hussein was the weapon of mass dest
John, I agree with what you say, but I did NOT write that!!!
Sheesh
Oops. Very sorry Keith. I know you didn't write that. That's what I
get for hastily replying while I'm waiting for the coffee to finish
brewing.
Again. Sorry about that.
jh
Take your emailer out and have it shot J
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come(Finally an eye is
opening)
>This is great ... finally we are making sense. The WMD is not the issue.
>This is what
that will show that not only are they shut but that it's
wilful.
Keith
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of Keith Addison
>Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:51 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Cru
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Re: The Energy Crunch To Come(Finally an eye is
opening)
And whose eye might that be Klaus? Not yours, I don't think.
>Keith,
>
>You are not right by saying that he did not threaten anybody. You needed to
>be there just for half a
l Mahajan is publisher of the blog Empire Notes. He has been to
occupied Iraq twice and reported from Fallujah during the April 2004
siege. His most recent book is Full Spectrum Dominance: U.S. Power in
Iraq and Beyond. He can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EM
70 matches
Mail list logo
