>From the letsrun message board. I assume that this guy must be talking about
t-and-f and not T&FN unless malmo took up gh's offer to pen a screed. I won't
find out until I get my issue a couple of months from now. Here is the topic of
the thread btw:
http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/general/featur
I would love to see the days return when you have 15,000 turn out for a UCLA
vs. USC dual meet. The last few years, the turnouts have increased
significantly at the dual between these two.
This is the kind of interest we need to help revive T&F in the USA.
I was personally saddened to see the Br
IL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do you
think of Milli Vanilli?
Randy Treadway wrote:
>You mean the disappearance of meaningful collegiate competition
>and the rise of day-long ti
Randy Treadway wrote:
>You mean the disappearance of meaningful collegiate competition
>and the rise of day-long time trial meets that no one wants to
>watch?
I assume you mean NCAA meets chasing meaningless provisional
qualifiers.
Give me the best individuals of the world in Zurich chasing world
es, I delete those
emails. If I find some, are you suggesting that it's now it's OK to
share some of those emails now?
malmo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ghill
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:31 PM
To: track list
Subjec
MAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:28:12 -0500
> To: "'ghill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do
> youthinkofMilli Vanilli?
>
> I do it for free here. You can owe me a cold beer.
>
> malmo
en why waste 450 more on a
> sciolistic smokescreen?
>
> malmo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ghill
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:16 AM
> To: track list
> Subject: Re: t-and-f: can I come back now
y 13, 2003 10:16 AM
To: track list
Subject: Re: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do
youthinkof Milli Vanilli?
> From: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:23:15 -0500
> To: "'ghill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "
My best number crunchers tell me that circulation would only increase
linearly.
malmo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith Whitman
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:54 AM
To: track list
Subject: Re: t-and-f: can I come back now? It
>You mean the disappearance of meaningful collegiate competition
>and the rise of day-long time trial meets that no one wants to
>watch?
I assume you mean NCAA meets chasing meaningless provisional
qualifiers.
Give me the best individuals of the world in Zurich chasing world records, with
rabbits
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Randall Northam
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do you
thinkof Milli Vanilli?
Doesn't work like that, sadly. Indi
Hello McFly? Hello?
You don't really consider what's posted on Letsrun to be meaningful or
reliable do you? Three quarters of the posts there are the malicious
work of the same half-dozen teenagers who've been banned from Dyestat. A
while back, there were two attorneys from two prestigous Pennsylv
Malmo wrote:
>>>
The REAL issue destroying the sport? You mean the disappearance of meaningful
collegiate competition and the rise of day-long time trial meets that no one wants to
watch? You mean the lack of coverage of our sport by the media (and don't say it's
because of drugs. The drop
Randall,
sorry I didn't include closed captioning for the sarcastically impaired
(eventhough I think the column could be a great thing, but definitely not
Malmo's style or venue). Good advice to TnF News though.
At 04:28 PM 2/13/03 +, Randall Northam wrote:
Doesn't work like that, sadly.
Keith Whitman wrote:
> Give the fans what we really want-a monthly column by Malmo.
What we really want are some *women* in those new monthly fold-outs!
bob
This could be a fun addition the mag though - the "monthly rant". One
month on drugs ... the next month on how racewalkers are all cheaters ...
the next month on Jon Entine ... the next month on the ineptness of USATF's
media policy...
Darn it, I see I'm too late to call dibs on the new mascot.
Doesn't work like that, sadly. Individual writers rarely increase
circulation by much. Trust me, I know. My magazine, Athletics Today,
had the best writers on the sport in the UK (OK so we also had a column
by Linford Christie, maybe that cancelled it out) but couldn't overtake
Athletics Weekly
Give the fans what we really want-a monthly column by Malmo. With all due
respect to the author of the editors column, I would venture a guess that
it would increase circulation exponentially.
I can see it now. People lined up at their mailboxes screaming Mal-mo,
Mal-mo, Mal-mo.
Keith Whi
Gerry wrote:
>OK, Caped Crusader, here's your chance to make a difference.
>Instead of wasting your words on the choir here, create some new gospel
>where you apparently think it's truly needed.
>Pen a screed of some 500 words of what you think T&FN should have been
>saying all these years
> From: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:23:15 -0500
> To: "'ghill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'track list'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...wh
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I haven't heard anything about IAAF "tour" status.
Between this meet, the big Stanford "distance show", and Portland
and Eugene-
what is the IAAF recognizing this year, and at what level?
<
This information is on the IAAF website:
http://www.ia
T&F News and malmo's posts.
Rich Harrington
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of malmo
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:23 PM
To: 'ghill'; 'track list'
Subject: RE: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends.
, of us who'd like to see
some backbone from the "Bible of the Sport". It's your slogan, not ours.
malmo-Two-ms: Stentorian? NOT!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ghill
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:44 PM
To: track l
> From: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's the doping that has an insidious effect on
> the sport, not the talk. I'm sure of it.
That may be, but the drugs aren't going away no matter how tight we close
our eyes. The talk (and perception), at least, we have a choice about.
Dan
=
http://Acco
ary 12, 2003 7:12 PM
To: track list
Subject: t-and-f: can I come back now?
Has everyone finally got Marion and Tim and Charlie out of their
systems, so we can go back to talking about real track & field issues?
To paraphrase economics, talk about bad talk driving out good. Once
everybody quits
many
subscribers you get.
gh
> From: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 20:35:58 -0500
> To: "'ghill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'track list'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: t-and-f: can I come bac
Nope. As I said before, the UK press has been the toughest on Jones et
al.
"We regard all the nandrolone cases as exceptional and we concluded a
doping offense hadn't been committed," said UK Athletics' performance
director Max Jones. "We don't regard Linford Christie as a drugs cheat."
LOL. Wha
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:11:34 -0800, you wrote:
>Has everyone finally got Marion and Tim and Charlie out of their systems, so
>we can go back to talking about real track & field issues?
>
>To paraphrase economics, talk about bad talk driving out good. Once
>everybody quits one of these beserk drug-
Has everyone finally got Marion and Tim and Charlie out of their systems, so
we can go back to talking about real track & field issues?
To paraphrase economics, talk about bad talk driving out good. Once
everybody quits one of these beserk drug-driven threads, there's nobody left
to post.
gh
29 matches
Mail list logo
