Re: [OSM-talk] Oracle is changing Java's license how will it affect JOSM?

2018-04-22 Thread Paweł Paprota
You are mixing so many different topics and misconceptions that I think you basically don't know what you're talking about. Perhaps you should read up on what is Java first... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_(programming_language) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Java_implementations

Re: [OSM-talk] GeoServer and OpenStreetMap

2016-09-29 Thread Paweł Paprota
I used a similar approach (osm2pgsql and connecting that as data source in GeoServer) in the past, also IIRC I used mapnik2geotools script to convert one of the Mapnik OSM styles to SLD, worked out quite well. Paweł On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, at 17:51, Jeff McKenna wrote: > On 2016-09-29 9:19 AM,

Re: [OSM-talk] The Proposed Great Colour Shift

2015-08-20 Thread Paweł Paprota
no place in OSM and order its deletion. What was that famous line in Animal Farm again? --colin On 2015-08-20 10:53, Paweł Paprota wrote: I'm taking bets on whether this thread will have more replies than the abandoned railroads (100+ and still going strong!) and win the prize

Re: [OSM-talk] The Proposed Great Colour Shift

2015-08-20 Thread Paweł Paprota
I'm taking bets on whether this thread will have more replies than the abandoned railroads (100+ and still going strong!) and win the prize for the Biggest Waste of Time in OSM for 2015. YES WE CAN('T) Paweł On Thu, Aug 20, 2015, at 03:16, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote: For those that did not

Re: [OSM-talk] History of specific areas

2015-08-13 Thread Paweł Paprota
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015, at 09:31, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:  I don't know if OWL can do it because it is offline. Is OWL gone forever?  My recollection is I was living in Salem and just joined the project more recently than

Re: [OSM-talk] Some thoughts against remote mapping

2015-06-14 Thread Paweł Paprota
And i think there are a lot of other areas in OSM that represent at least as efficient (and therefore damaging) means of cultural imperialism as remote mapping. Acting as devil's advocate, I have a quick question - are you 100% sure that you are not overthinking stuff? I see discussion after

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM is a right mess (was: Craigslist OpenStreetMap Rendering Issue)

2015-06-04 Thread Paweł Paprota
Could you please move this discussion to the tagging list? On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 16:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am 04.06.2015 um 01:48 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com: A value of residential here seems to need a key to identify whether it relates to a

Re: [OSM-talk] Can wikidata links help fight name inflation?

2015-05-28 Thread Paweł Paprota
But what exactly is the problem that you're trying to solve with this idea? Database size? There are much bigger contributing factors to database size than this, like rampant data redundancy everywhere, botched mechanical edits etc. Complexity of the UI of editors? I'm sure they can manage to

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing on osm.org

2015-02-17 Thread Paweł Paprota
Great work! Picked up by Slashdot BTW: http://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/02/17/1351206/openstreetmaporg-gets-routing :-) Paweł On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 15:22, Steve Coast wrote: +1 this is awesome Steve On Feb 16, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Michael Kugelmann michaelk_...@gmx.de wrote: Am

Re: [OSM-talk] discussion: inclusion and alcohol

2014-11-04 Thread Paweł Paprota
Not to be a wise ass but it looks recently like OSM is setting out to solve every single problem starting from gender inequality, good practices for bookkeeping, methods for democratic voting and now alcoholic beverages and noise levels at OSM related events... At the same time Ilya Zverev's

Re: [OSM-talk] Addresses are a tiny fraction of what we do (was: The world’s best addressable map)

2014-10-24 Thread Paweł Paprota
OSM is not a melting pot for the world's open data and while there is a place for imports, every import will have to be carefully thought about and evaluated. Streamlining that process is not necessarily in the best interest of OpenStreetMap. What do you mean? Clearly it *is* in the

Re: [OSM-talk] weekly – 219 – 23.09.-29.09.2014

2014-10-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
Good stuff, keep it coming! On Wed, Oct 8, 2014, at 00:27, Manfred A. Reiter wrote: Hi, the weekly Nr. 219 with all important news from the OpenStreetMap ecosystem is published. http://www.weeklyosm.eu/ Have a lot of fun. -- ## Manfred

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM completeness

2014-09-02 Thread Paweł Paprota
I developed a tool some time ago to analyze many aspects of the road network. See the output here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMonitor/Poland_Major_Roads Unfortunately I don't have time to work on it anymore so it was launched only for Poland, Serbia and Czech Republic. It would be

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Isn't All That Open, Let's Change That and Drop Share-Alike

2014-03-13 Thread Paweł Paprota
Read this and substitute OSM for Wikipedia: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/13/google_stabs_wikipedia_in_the_front/ quote The moral is: if you're a contributor to an open web resource, then beware: the hippy ethos simply marks you out as a mug. Unless you protect and license your work, you 

Re: [OSM-talk] full history planet file updated?

2013-11-02 Thread Paweł Paprota
+1 to the update. Also it would be nice to have up-to-date extracts (by continent and country). On Sat, Nov 2, 2013, at 17:02, Peter Körner wrote: Hi it wood be pretty cool to have an known updatecycle for full history planets. It does not need to be often but it would help to know how long

Re: [OSM-talk] Interesting website stuff in the works

2013-07-28 Thread Paweł Paprota
Thanks for the summary. BTW, what happened to the week in OSM newsletter which seems to serve similar purpose? Haven't seen one of them in a while. Paweł On Fri, Jul 26, 2013, at 7:48, Paul Norman wrote: I'm trying something different in the hopes of getting more awareness about potential

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping cooperation between countries in OSM

2013-07-26 Thread Paweł Paprota
Pretty cool. Looks like people are mostly contributing to neighboring countries and also to popular holiday destinations :-) I can confirm this as I live on Polish/Czech border and often map in Czech Republic. On Thu, Jul 25, 2013, at 11:47, Frédéric Bonifas wrote: Hi, For a long time I have

Re: [OSM-talk] Using OpenStreetMap on a daily basis

2013-07-12 Thread Paweł Paprota
The important part is to understand that the current lack of end-user services is not because of lack of knowledge, technology or any thing similar, but by design. Umm, no, not really. It most certainly *is* because of the lack of knowledge, technology, time, people and many other resources.

Re: [OSM-talk] Seeing changesets confined to an area

2013-06-07 Thread Paweł Paprota
http://owl.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ On Fri, Jun 7, 2013, at 14:17, David Richfield wrote: Hi, I want to see changesets that affect an area, and all I'm seeing when I click on history are changesets that affect map elements that are scattered across a huge area, but don't affect anything

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-ca] Tag for Tim Horton's

2013-05-31 Thread Paweł Paprota
Just a polite reminder that the tagg...@openstreetmap.org list is the proper place for such discussions... On Fri, May 31, 2013, at 1:42, Paul Johnson wrote: Not a cafe, then, that'd be more of a restaurant. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:21 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote: I

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Google Maps being praised for removing I-5 colasped bridge quickly

2013-05-25 Thread Paweł Paprota
Things like these and in general Google/Apple/insert your favorite corporation here-mania really only show how upside down the world is nowadays. Does OSM really want press like that? I'm not sure... true, it would get the word out about OSM but is that the proper way to publicize? I think people

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Google Maps being praised for removing I-5 colasped bridge quickly

2013-05-25 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 05/25/2013 12:15 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Of course with Wikipedia it was somehow easier because all of their work gets indexed by search engines Also osm is indexed by search engines Sure but have you ever seen a link to OSM object (way/relation/node) in the internet? When

Re: [OSM-talk] Paweł's q: what can be done?

2013-02-04 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 02/03/2013 10:51 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: I don't know exactly what git log you mean. OSM is a whole universe of software; a part of that is visible on https://github.com/openstreetmap/. The bit that is on https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website is but a tiny fragment of it.

Re: [OSM-talk] STFU

2013-02-03 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 02/02/2013 11:30 PM, Chris Hill wrote: Actually, I question just how valuable the work is of someone who uses it to threaten the community with withdrawing it if he is a bit upset. I prefer to see the work given freely without strings attached - that's what I see as what Open means. YMMV.

Re: [OSM-talk] Paweł's q: what can be done?

2013-02-03 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 02/02/2013 11:49 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: you are too impatient, at least too impatient for the occasionally glacial pace at which things move in OSM(F). You have been with OSM for about 6 months now if I'm not mistaken, and most of your recent messages (at least most of the messages that

Re: [OSM-talk] Paweł's q: what can be done?

2013-02-03 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 02/03/2013 07:35 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, On 03.02.2013 12:36, Paweł Paprota wrote: What I want right now is some sign that OSM is not fading away as a project. Shouldn't this be the other way round - shouldn't somebody who claims that OSM was about to fade away have proof

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent edits in the wiki / Trademark issue

2013-02-02 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 02/01/2013 04:22 PM, Simon Poole wrote: Please address any questions on the matter to me by e-mail and not to the list. Why? Paweł ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent edits in the wiki / Trademark issue

2013-02-02 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 02/01/2013 08:54 PM, andrzej zaborowski wrote: I agree with what you're saying although I can't help thinking that if the OSMF can't take the risk of having some things in the wiki, the solution, for everyone's benefit, is to move the wiki to a server that's not paid for by the OSMF. I'm

Re: [OSM-talk] Recent edits in the wiki / Trademark issue

2013-02-02 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 02/02/2013 02:38 PM, Ed Loach wrote: As far as I can see, OSMF Ltd is very like KDE ev; compare http://blog.osmfoundation.org/about/ and http://ev.kde.org/whatiskdeev.php Legal status is the least of what I meant. Compare what OSMF does with this quarterly report from the KDE foundation:

Re: [OSM-talk] Paweł's q: what can be done?

2013-02-02 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 02/02/2013 07:41 PM, Jeff Meyer wrote: There's a group working in parallel to put together a strategic plan, in the absence of one, but doing this without leadership and support from the top can be problematic. Couple of people have mentioned the Strategic Working Group[1] to me in the last

Re: [OSM-talk] STFU

2013-02-02 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 02/02/2013 10:23 PM, Chris Hill wrote: Threats to leave the project remind me of the bullshit thrown around during licence-change when hardly anyone actually had the balls to follow through. If people are so unhappy then go, but do so quickly and quietly and leave the people really

Re: [OSM-talk] POI display on osm.org

2013-01-23 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/23/2013 09:35 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: I suspect that looking for things of type X is more of an end user goal though, which isn't the target audience for the OSM web site. ...or is it? :-) The question we should be asking is what sort of approach helps mappers and for that I suspect

Re: [OSM-talk] POI display on osm.org

2013-01-23 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/22/2013 09:35 AM, Ilya Zverev wrote: Right now, in Roland's version, it isn't even clear that one should click on the map to get information. In one of the EWG meetings POI display was split into two separate tasks:

Re: [OSM-talk] POI display on osm.org

2013-01-23 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/23/2013 12:31 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: Well that one seems wrong to me as it is approaching the issue from one of achieving feature parity with Google Maps, but as I have always understood it that has never been our goal. It also provides better user experience. Sure we can say that the

Re: [OSM-talk] POI display on osm.org

2013-01-21 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/21/2013 03:17 PM, Peter Wendorff wrote: A perfect solution here might be to extend Mapnik to report as additional meta data to a tile the objects rendered (and/or skipped) Mapnik has a grid renderer that does exactly what you described:

Re: [OSM-talk] RFC - OSM contributor mark

2013-01-16 Thread Paweł Paprota
Isn't the purpose of OSM and Contributors to credit or attribute the source of the map tile data? Maybe, maybe not. More importantly - the fact that there's a discussion what this mark tries to communicate means that it fails to do it properly in the first place. At first glance I thought

Re: [OSM-talk] New History tab for openstreetmap.org (beta)

2013-01-14 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/13/2013 04:20 PM, MonkZ wrote: Maybe colorcoded here was an edit in log(x) minutes (tilewise png transparency or css opiacity) or colorcoded amount of edits within this week (tilewise png transparency or css opiacity) I tried that in some UI experiments a few weeks ago and it looked

Re: [OSM-talk] New History tab for openstreetmap.org (beta)

2013-01-13 Thread Paweł Paprota
is running very low on two 500GB SSDs on the server and I would rather remove useless tiles than resort to moving data to the spinning drive :-) Paweł On 01/04/2013 12:01 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote: http://owl.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ Couple of things: * Zoom levels = 14 should be usable

Re: [OSM-talk] RFC - OSM contributor mark

2013-01-11 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/11/2013 03:26 PM, Alex Barth wrote: http://yhahn.github.com/byosm/ (just a demo domain, this should live ideally on `openstreetmap.org/contributors`) Looks good as far as I understand the proposal... One thing came to me at a quick glance - the new /contributors page does not have any

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-09 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/09/2013 03:05 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: My idea of dealing with this complex situation is to: This all sounds nice but has it been done on a scale that OSM needs it to work? Are there large projects that have this kind of organization that you describe? There are dozens of large open

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-09 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/09/2013 11:17 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote: OpenOffice, now part of Apache, is well known, sure - but I think, still more people know Microsoft Office than OpenOffice. I don't think ASF would be happy with you reducing them to OpenOffice :-) They have over a hundred of well-known projects

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-09 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/09/2013 12:20 PM, Peter Wendorff wrote: Communication professionals IMHO most often sound like marketing. I did not mean communication professionals but giving more resources to the OSMF's Communication Working Group or similar initiatives. Posting a tweet or a blog post now and then

Re: [OSM-talk] Simple improvement(s) to openstreetmap.org

2013-01-09 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/09/2013 01:37 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: I may be a grumpy old dinosaur but I don't see how diluting the Openstreetmap brand into the bland broth of proprietary centralized social services that plague the Internet nowadays will bring any value... Simple question then: you go to osm.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Being more like Wikipedia

2013-01-09 Thread Paweł Paprota
Frederik, Hundreds of man-years of developer time... and still a person with average computer literacy cannot add a table to an article! Maybe ease-of-use is not a priority for them? I could imagine a lot of arguments against having a full WYSIWYG editor in Wikipedia. Regardless, their

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Frederik, I basically agree with everything that Jeff wrote in reply to your e-mail so I won't reiterate the same points. One thing to note - look at the numbers: between 2010 and today, the number of users doubled and in the same period the number of active contributors did not change

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/07/2013 11:32 PM, Johan C wrote: The Wikimedia Foundation launched a strategic planning process in 2009: http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page which, in 2010, resulted in a collaborative vision for the movement till 2015. Thanks for this link, I have not seen this before... it's

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Roland, Mapnik and all the other tools you mentioned have all been developed without a strategic vision and without formal permission from whomever Because they are single-purpose libraries that don't really need any strategic vision other than do we use XML/CSS/C/C++ for this decisions.

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
It has been said that many people sign up to OSM because they believe they'll have advanced user features (more maps? your own map style? whatever). Without any research into this, you cannot conclude that those who sign up would have been mappers if only our web interface was more like

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/08/2013 01:16 PM, Roland Olbricht wrote: Please tell people the truth, you actively contribute to impede the Top Ten Tasks. Let's take a look at If you think that this solution (Overpass popup) would be suitable for the main website, why don't you just develop it and propose the merge

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
(...) What you describe sounds good in theory (ecosystem) but in practice it does not work that way. You can't just pick and choose some cool projects and integrate them into the main site. Software (in particular, open source software) is not a puzzle that can be easily thrown together and

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Richard, I just came back from a few hours of skiing, full of enthusiasm to continue my work on OWL and interested how the discussion in this thread evolved and what do I see? Accusations of sabotage thrown at me... So basically - I think I start to understand what you said. Paweł

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Jeff, On 01/08/2013 07:48 PM, Jeff Meyer wrote: Paweł - Please do not be discouraged by the voice of one person delivering an ad-hominem attack. There are plenty of people - including myself - who are excited by your sabotage of OSM efforts through OWL. Where can I send the dynamite? I

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch A bit off-topic but this sentence from Clifford's footer really stuck with me. Maps with a human touch - I like that, perhaps it could be more widely used as a OSM slogan :-) Paweł ___ talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
Now take this Linux methaphor and apply it to OSM and its main website. In my time that I spent following Rails Port and in general main website development (about 6 months) I have seen 2 maybe 3 people writing major pieces of code for Rails Port, some of those pieces have been rejected from

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-08 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/08/2013 08:32 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: I will develop a survey with the help of anyone that wishes to contribute. That's a potentially good initiative but I would be careful so that it does not degenerate into another kind of todo or wishlist, like this:

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Future Look

2013-01-07 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hello Clifford, Very interesting e-mail. It seems that as the project grows, there is more and more people feeling like there should be some kind of next level that OSM as a project and community should reach. I agree with that. It seems to me that OSM needs a full time staff that can work

Re: [OSM-talk] New History tab for openstreetmap.org (beta)

2013-01-07 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Julien, Could it be possible to integrate the user classification visible here ( http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc) by example by adding the same coloured man icon on the right of OSM User link. IMHO it could be very usefull to know if an edit has been done by a new user of a senior user

Re: [OSM-talk] New History tab for openstreetmap.org (beta)

2013-01-06 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Dave, Thanks for your feedback - it is exactly what I was hoping for. Things I've noticed: RSS gives this error: We're sorry, but something went wrong. Thanks, I'll fix that. Scroll bar Gets 'stuck' as I move it down some of the lettering doesn't scroll (Firefox 17.01, Shockwave

Re: [OSM-talk] New History tab for openstreetmap.org (beta)

2013-01-04 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Toby, On 01/04/2013 12:41 AM, Toby Murray wrote: Holy smokes this is great. What is the status of the data backing it? I see one changeset a coworker just made to our office building (new user today!) but a changeset I made to to highway west of town on December 31st doesn't seem to be

Re: [OSM-talk] New History tab for openstreetmap.org (beta)

2013-01-04 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/04/2013 10:18 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: Correct - although the data shown in the history panel is from the live database (via the replication feed) the actual database backing that rails instance is separate so none of the changesets shown will exist. Exactly. Same goes for nodes, ways and

Re: [OSM-talk] New History tab for openstreetmap.org (beta)

2013-01-04 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/04/2013 09:50 AM, Christian Quest wrote: Very nice improvement. Bravo ! Where should we report bugs/ideas ? The code is here: https://github.com/ppawel/openstreetmap-website/tree/owl-history-tab So the issues should probably go here for now:

Re: [OSM-talk] New History tab for openstreetmap.org (beta)

2013-01-04 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 01/04/2013 10:13 AM, Alex Barth wrote: Pawel - This is great. What would it take to make this blazing fast? There is still a lot challenges ahead with performance such as: * On high zoom levels OWL API response time is acceptable most of the time but I only tested it with 1.5M

Re: [OSM-talk] New History tab for openstreetmap.org (beta)

2013-01-04 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Pierre, On 01/04/2013 01:52 AM, Pierre Béland wrote: http://owl.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-1.70737lon=29.02081zoom=15layers=M This is indeed a great example. I put the symbols in the sidebar one day just because it was easy to do (CSS classes and images were already there) and I

Re: [OSM-talk] Marketshare iPhone Google Maps Hits 10 Million Downloads in 48 Hours

2013-01-03 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Johan, On 01/03/2013 10:53 PM, Johan C wrote: I´m quite surprised that so few OSM´ers are interested in discussing the approach to gain market share for OSM. After my first posting mid December now Waze is in the news, with up to 30 million users:

[OSM-talk] New History tab for openstreetmap.org (beta)

2013-01-03 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi all, For some time now I've been working on the OpenStreetMap Watch List project[1] and on integrating OWL into the main OSM website. At this point I've got something slowly approaching beta status and I would appreciate early feedback from the community. You can see it in action here:

Re: [OSM-talk] MapBox and OSM in Eclipse LocationTech

2012-11-04 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi, This has been discussed on the dev list several times already, see for example: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2012-October/025746.html http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2012-October/025970.html Also see their blog: http://mapbox.com/osmdev/ Paweł

Re: [OSM-talk] Tracking Something/Anything in OSM

2012-10-22 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi, There is a demo instance of the Activity Streams functionality: http://suncobalt.dyndns.org:8081/ Zoom in to the area that you want and click Activity tab. There is a link for RSS. Right now I'm working on a more general solution to storing change information because that's the main

Re: [OSM-talk] Gauß' edits to turn resctrictions wiki pages

2012-10-21 Thread Paweł Paprota
Polish page also has been reverted (yesterday): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Pl:Relation:restrictionaction=history Paweł On Sun, Oct 21, 2012, at 12:00, Cobra wrote: Hi all, those of you reading tagging@ might have noticed a similar thread two weeks ago:

Re: [OSM-talk] Activity Stream (a.k.a. social OSM) - demo instance

2012-10-16 Thread Paweł Paprota
On 10/16/2012 03:44 PM, Alex Barth wrote: Very interesting. Activities seems to be going for replacing the history tab - am I seeing this right? I was expecting activity streams an expansion of the 'your friends' feed on my user profile. I. e. while on the history tab I get a complete

Re: [OSM-talk] help.osm.org - platform migration research

2012-10-15 Thread Paweł Paprota
/wiki/Top_Ten_Tasks/Progress/Support_for_multiple_languages_on_help.osm.org#Update_.28October_2012.29 Paweł On Sat, Oct 13, 2012, at 12:41, Paweł Paprota wrote: Hi all, During the EWG meeting last week I volunteered to research migration feasibility for the help.osm.org platform migration due

[OSM-talk] Activity Stream (a.k.a. social OSM) - demo instance

2012-10-15 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi all, I've been working and working on this stuff or a few weeks now, I guess now is as good time as any to show a pre-pre-alpha version :-) So what I have for you today is a demo instance [1] of the Rails Port that is integrated with Activity Server by means of the new Activity tab - this tab

Re: [OSM-talk] Activity Stream (a.k.a. social OSM) - demo instance

2012-10-15 Thread Paweł Paprota
When you zoom in to a small area there is indeed no activities in many places - there is only ~8000 activities in the database at this point, replication is still in progress. As for the translation - I have added an English one but for some reason it is not being picked up in Javascript, so it's

Re: [OSM-talk] Activity Stream (a.k.a. social OSM) - demo instance

2012-10-15 Thread Paweł Paprota
IMHO the separate tabs on osm.org are a little bit fuzzy in their concept, yet. We have tabs for search, data details, map key, export and your proposed activities. The Tab concept as it's used currently lacks combination possibilities: It's not possible to show any combination of tabs,

Re: [OSM-talk] Activity Stream (a.k.a. social OSM) - demo instance

2012-10-15 Thread Paweł Paprota
Sure, this is the whole Poland: http://suncobalt.dyndns.org:8081/?lat=51.61lon=22.44zoom=7layers=M BTW, the activities are not reloaded automatically (and the Reload button doesn't work - I will fix that in a minute) right now so when you change the bounding box you need to click Activity tab

[OSM-talk] help.osm.org - platform migration research

2012-10-13 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi all, During the EWG meeting last week I volunteered to research migration feasibility for the help.osm.org platform migration due to i18n problems with current software (OSQA). I have started putting together some content on the wiki (see [1]), if you want to get involved, either by

Re: [OSM-talk] User activity stream - progress update

2012-10-02 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Tobias, Thank you very much for your response! Brainstorm of things I would find interesting in a stream follows: - activity from other *.osm.org services (forum, help, wiki watchlist) - posts from blogs.osm.org (not unlike diaries, but hosted externally) - releases of OSM-related

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposal: New Working Group Welcome WG

2012-10-02 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi Richard, I read the proposal and to be honest I'm not sure about the hypothesis (Early contact increases mapper engagement). For me it would seem kind of creepy if a website that I've just registered and done something on contacted me personally saying You've added a restaurant. I think that

[OSM-talk] User activity stream - progress update

2012-09-30 Thread Paweł Paprota
Hi all, Back in August I made some noise on IRC and mailing lists about the activity stream stuff. We had some discussions about technical approach which were very useful to me. Since then I got side tracked with other work, both OSM related and otherwise. However, this weekend I've started