Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned buildings

As soon as you record the data it is in the database, it doesn't matter whether it is rendered on the standard map or not. I think that if you need "stats" on abandoned buildings or shops, that you will load the data into your own database or a GIS system such as QGIS, where you can really analyse

Re: [OSM-talk] Not sure what to think

What about changeset comments with "google" in it ? On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Hans De Kryger wrote: > So i just came across an edit of a user near me that listed the source of > his edit as (Google Maps Street View) (1) > > I have just contacted the user asking

Re: [OSM-talk] Is there a OSM map viewer program to dynamically view OSM data?

http://www.openpoimap.org http://www.openlinkmap.org http://www.flosm.de/en/POI-map.html or look at the complete list at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM-based_services regards m On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Wuzzy wrote: > Hi! > > I was wondering if there is

Re: [OSM-talk] Is there a OSM map viewer program to dynamically view OSM data?

oops, I missed the "standalone" part in your message On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.openpoimap.org > http://www.openlinkmap.org > http://www.flosm.de/en/POI-map.html > > or look at the complete list at >

[OSM-talk-be] Nieuw verkeersplan Gent

Werk aan de winkel voor de Gentse mappers :-) http://www.demorgen.be/binnenland/gent-krijgt-grootste-voetgangersgebied-van-het-land-b832f2ce/?utm_source=demorgen_medium=email_campaign=newsletter_content=daily_userid=c608fd0-f9aa-e68f-ae04-400212814eec mvg m

Re: [OSM-talk] Belgium/Netherlands Boundary Change

No, the border does not have to be changed yet, although there seems to be an agreement between both governments Discussion on Belgian mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2016-January/008250.html On the Dutch Forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53204

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim weakness

openlinkmap.org has such a box (search only in current map view). I assume it is using nominatim for obtaining the data. regards m. On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Stephan Knauss wrote: > > > On December 24, 2015 11:21:22 AM GMT+01:00, malenki wrote:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] strange boundaries in belgium

Take e.g. a look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1376903/history, where braadworst123 added Wijnendale to Itchtegem admin_level=9. I left a comment at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36066185 regards m On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>

[OSM-talk-be] Winterwandelboek van Scheldeland

Het Winterwandelboek van Toerisme Scheldeland [1] gebruikt o.a. kaartjes gebaseerd op OpenStreetMap. Ik heb hen vriendelijk gevraagd bij een volgende versie "(c) OpenStreetMap contributors" te vermelden mvg m [1] http://www.scheldeland.be/winter/

Re: [OSM-talk-be] strange boundaries in belgium

; > Daarnaast valt wijnegem onder grondgebied Torhout, en niet Ichtegem (en ik > vraag me ook af hoe hij de grens bepaald heeft). > > Mvg, > Sander > > > > 2015-12-22 5:28 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: >> >> Take e.g. a look at >> http://w

Re: [OSM-talk-be] strange boundaries in belgium

ttp://osm.org/way/386821195 > http://osm.org/way/386798754 > http://osm.org/way/386827244 > http://osm.org/way/386795768 > http://osm.org/way/386835878 > http://osm.org/way/386822671 > > > Op 22 december 2015 09:52 schreef Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: > >>

[OSM-talk-be] Website voor controle openingsuren

Brief English text below Sinds kort zijn de Belgische feestdagen opgenomen in de website voor de controle van openingsuren van Robin Schneider [1]. Ook heb ik geprobeerd een Nederlandse vertaling te voorzien. Kunnen jullie eens kijken en je laten weten of je iets anders zou vertalen. Niet alle

[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Release openstreetmap-carto v2.37.0

-- Forwarded message -- From: Matthijs Melissen Date: Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:38 AM Subject: [OSM-talk] Release openstreetmap-carto v2.37.0 To: OpenStreetMap , osm-dev List Dear all, Today, v2.37.0 of the

Re: [OSM-talk] What3words

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Colin Smale wrote: > In my example the party that needs to do the translation from w3w to lat/lon > would be Amazon, and they will probably be paying w3w for a licence to do > that. Wouldn't it be more likely that Amazon would invent their

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Taalfaciliteiten + taalgrens + straatnamen

Some remarks (I know we are not mapping for XXX) * Putting both Dutch and French names under name, breaks OsmAnd's capability to tell the name in Dutch or French as far as I know. It now tells both names * name:left and name:right are not recognized by Nominatim AFIAK. So searching for only

Re: [OSM-talk-be] strange looping tracks

Volgens http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Riding moet je een weide om te grazen mappen als According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Riding, you have to use landuse=meadow, meadow=pasture (undocumented) landcover=grass (optional) de track zelf / the race track leisure=track

[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Seek support for worldwide mapathon on Dec 3rd for places accessibility

-- Forwarded message -- From: Holger Dieterich Date: Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:30 PM Subject: [OSM-talk] Seek support for worldwide mapathon on Dec 3rd for places accessibility To: t...@openstreetmap.org Dear fellow OSM members, I'm the cofounder of

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Mapbox, road completeness, CIA factbook

thanks for the link >> >> but it seems surprising no? >> France is at 100% and us at 73? ... it's kind of low no? any idea where >> those road are? >> >> 2015-11-20 6:52 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Mapbox ma

[OSM-talk-be] Mapbox, road completeness, CIA factbook

Mapbox made a tool [1] to see how complete the road networks in a country are. Belgium got a 73% They blogged about it in [2] regards m [1] https://www.mapbox.com/data-platform/country/#belgium [2] https://www.mapbox.com/blog/how-complete-is-openstreetmap/

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Osmose onjuiste "rijstroken"

(psv:lanes:forward=1) != (lanes:forward=2) --> lanes:psv:forward = 1 --> geeft het aantal rijstroken + (bijvoorbeeld) psv:lanes:forward=|designated --> geeft aan welke rijstroken. 2015-11-19 11:21 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas : > Met de quick fix bedoelde ik dat er nog een

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Winterwandelboek van Scheldeland

Ik heb zonet het bericht gekregen dat er vanaf maandag een nieuwe versie op de site zal staan, met (c) OpenStreetMap contributors onder elke kaart. Ik heb deze versie al mogen inkijken. Wat een vriendelijk mailtje al niet kan doen :-) m 2015-12-22 7:39 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] BE Quarterly Projects - Défis du trimestre BE - BE Driemaandelijks projecten

2016-01-13 8:12 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe : > Seeing the disucssion here, I'm thinking we should the quarterlys with a > wiki session. Adding to the international wiki where possible, creating > local tagging guidelines where necessary. > +1 The German community does

Re: [OSM-talk-be] BE Quarterly Projects - Défis du trimestre BE - BE Driemaandelijks projecten

Rob Nickerson posted a mail on the Irish and British mailing list about the status of the quarterly project about schools in GB and IE: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ie/2016-January/001418.html In case you are interested in the full discussion, I recommend that you take a look at

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposal to close newbies@ list

In Belgium and The Netherlands, there are people that try to contact every new mapper via a personal message. This message includes a list of sources where the mapper can ask for help. The message is in the language of the mapper (Dutch or French). Belgian mappers get informed about the Belgian

Re: [OSM-talk-be] BE Quarterly Projects - Défis du trimestre BE - BE Driemaandelijks projecten

Il y a * http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ISCED * en France on utilise par example school:fr=college * operator/religion voir http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool m. 2016-01-12 10:16 GMT+01:00 eMerzh : > Très bonne idée :) i'm in ... >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen Cyclisme Flandre occidentale

2016-01-12 22:04 GMT+01:00 Marc Zoutendijk : > Ik zag ze in openpoimap terug: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/17226226/OSM/bentille1.png > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/17226226/OSM/bentille2.png Tja, ik merkte pas thuis op dat die bakker nog niet in kaart

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Import of 2000 DAE in Belgium (Defibrillators / Défibrillateurs)

stands (on a wolrd-wide basis). Lot's of discussion. But like I said, you might get away with it. regards m On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> wrote: > On 02-06-16 19:25, Marc Gemis wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Glenn Plas <gl.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] GR Flanders data available for mapping!

gt; create something for integrating PT (and keeping it up to date) using > PythonAnywhere.com. > > Jo > > 2016-06-06 23:02 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Darya is

Re: [OSM-talk-be] fietsstraat, bicycle_road, cyclestreet,...

I prefer to explicitly tag the roads with the maxspeeds and access rules. The reason: why would we enforce data consumers to consult another data source to find this data. Why make it difficult to merge that data with OSM data ? What's the next step for splitting data: keep the address data

Re: [OSM-talk-be] GRB open data

FYI, some people will also map amenity=pub, restaurant, etc. as the area for e.g. the pub + terrace + parking space and put the address on that area (was also discussed on the GB--mailing list in order to seek a common way of mapping amenities.) Others might map this as landuse=retail.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Import of 2000 DAE in Belgium (Defibrillators / > Défibrillateurs)

Je mag natuurlijk altijd zelf de defribilator mappen in OSM en je foto prive houden. Zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator voor de tagging. mvg m 2016-06-06 9:28 GMT+02:00 Philippe Casteleyn : > Eindelijk iemand die niet al een

Re: [OSM-talk-be] fietsstraat, bicycle_road, cyclestreet,...

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Glenn Plas wrote: > But most motorways in Belgium have a maxspeed assigned, not > sure where this idea comes from. (examples ?) I guess you have to dive into the talk page, archive of tagging mailing list, some fora, etc. to find out where

Re: [OSM-talk-be] GRB open data

amenity=school + address information is not so unusual 111.000 of them are tagged with some address information according to taginfo. I think the UK community tagged them like this during their quarterly project. (I'm too lazy to look up their discussions to get confirmation about this) The wiki

Re: [OSM-talk-be] GR Flanders data available for mapping!

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Jo wrote: > Darya is working on such a tool for public transport (GSoC project). I don't > think it would be very hard to extend it to walking and cycle routes. But > let's see in a month or 2 if there is time left to do that. > Will that be a

[OSM-talk-be] Wegen en Verkeer

Onlangs kreeg ik een link van een mede mapper naar de website van Wegen en Verkeer. Ze gebruiken ook een kaart gebaseerd op OpenStreetMap. Jammer genoeg ontbrak de copyright. Dit is zopas recht gezet nadat ik vorige week een mailtje had gestuurd. Dus weer een website die "(C) OpenStreetMap

[OSM-talk-be] Meeting with RLRL

Hallo, I want to inform you about a meeting that I will have with Regionaal Landschap Rivierenland (RLRL) on June 16 in their offices in Mechelen. The idea is that I will give an overview of OSM. One of employees contacted me regarding a walking route in Rumst. I provided some additional websites

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Freedom of Panorama approved in parliament, just a matter of time before official

volgens eerdere berichtgeving die ik heb gezien, was die "ontbrekende" partij ook voor het voorstel. 2016-06-17 14:13 GMT+02:00 Philippe Casteleyn : > Onthou vooral voor wie je niet moet stemmen. Er ontbreekt wel een partij. > Heeft iemand een link naar de

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Radio 2 Programma De Inspecteur & navigatiesystemen

ngeset/40165558 >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40165816 >> >> Overigens in die wijk deze note gemaakt toen ik er passeerde met de GR12 >> west: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/587922 >> >> Dus lokaal survey zeker nuttig! >> >> Op

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Radio 2 Programma De Inspecteur & navigatiesystemen

Ik heb ze (stad Mechelen) via tweet gevraagd om ons (osm_be) op de hoogte te houden vanzulke wijzigingen of het eventueel zelf te doen. Ben benieuwd of ze gaan reageren. m Op 20 jun. 2016 23:24 schreef "Philippe Casteleyn" < philippecastel...@hotmail.com>: > > > betere link : >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Radio 2 Programma De Inspecteur & navigatiesystemen

2016-06-21 9:18 GMT+02:00 joost schouppe : > Allen, > Hebben we tools om op te pikken dat een bestaand adres nu ergens anders > ligt? > > Hebben we tools om op te pikken dat een wegsegment van AGIV van naam > veranderd is (naar een naam die al bestond, dus geen nieuwe

[OSM-talk-be] RLRL presentatie : de presentatie

oeps nog vergeten, de presentatie zelf: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1YP5vl65q0nTDFIELHnDnTy1U6kNrreF-5Bd2XeudWgQ/edit?usp=sharing We hadden 2 uur uitgetrokken, uiteindelijk zijn het er 3.5 geworden. Ik was begonnen met enkele life demos: osm.org. - historic.place - overpass En door de

[OSM-talk-be] Meeting met RLRL

Hallo, ik heb vandaag mijn presentatie bij RLRL gaan geven. Er was ook iemand van Schelde-Durme aanwezig. En hoewel sommige OSM al kenden (bv via OsmAnd), waren ze blij verrast dat we zoveel verschillende informatie verzamelen. Nu ja, de streek rond Mechelen is wel goed gemapped. Ook konden we

[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [Wikimedia Belgium] Freedom of Panorama approved in parliament, just a matter of time before official

For those that also contribute to wikimedia -- Doorgestuurd bericht -- Van: "Romaine Wiki" Datum: 17 jun. 2016 02:44 Onderwerp: [Wikimedia Belgium] Freedom of Panorama approved in parliament, just a matter of time before official Aan: "Wikimedia Belgium

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nieuw verkeersplan Gent

ing party rond het > circulatieplan te organiseren. Ik moet nog wat punten en komma's zetten om > alles rond te krijgen, maar ik hoop jullie binnenkort meer nieuws te kunnen > brengen. > > Met vriendelijke groeten, > > Seppe > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen Cyclisme Flandre occidentale

2016-01-09 12:00 GMT+01:00 Jakka : > Is er al iets bedacht voor aanpak? op je fiets springen ? :-) Met de ontbrekende wandelroutes doen we feitelijk hetzelfde. Dit weekend ben ik bv. nog in Bentille geweest [1]. Doordat ik daar zelf ben geweest heb ik naast de

[OSM-talk-be] Mapper in the Spotlight: Fredy Rivera (Colombia)

In our international serie of interview: Fredy Rivera from Colombia: English: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/escada/diary/37773 Spanish: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/escada/diary/37774 I would like to thank Joost Schouppe for conducting the interview and making the translation Enjoy. m

[OSM-talk-be] Roundabouts are popular in Belgium

see https://www.mapbox.com/bites/00205/#5.72/50.893/5.948 :-) found via http://alloveralbany.com/archive/2016/01/15/roundabouts-theyre-everywhere have a nice mapping weekend m ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nieuwe Agiv-beelden!

bij mij in de buurt (Rupelstreek -prov. Antwerpen) zijn de foto's in december al eens aangepast m 2016-01-16 15:50 GMT+01:00 Sander Deryckere : > Voor de volledigheid, enkel Vlaams-Brabant, Oost-Vlaanderen en > West-Vlaanderen zijn momenteel geupdated. > > Antwerpen en

Re: [OSM-talk] Need some help

Coinmap was announced a long time ago on the forum: [1] A search on Google for "Coinmap OSM" returns as first entry: " coinmap https://coinmap.org/ By subscribing, you agree with the terms of Mailchimp Privacy Policy. Copyright © SatoshiLabs. All Rights Reserved. Portions of data ©

Re: [OSM-talk-be] rise of the voetwegen, part 2

I'm currently processing my surveyed data around Wieze (Lebbeke). It's amazing how many ways user Scapor mapped there with note: "Weg nr. xxx" or "Path nr yyy". Some of those lines are just draw through buildings. It's data from around 2011. But I hope we (and they) learned that we only want data

Re: [OSM-talk-be] rise of the voetwegen, part 2

I totally agree with Wouter's list. And I leave the most edge cases in OSM, even when they are only tagged with note=Weg XXX (no highway tag). But the ones that are just crossing through houses, through backyards, etc. I remove. Also the ones through fenced fields are deleted. Again, it's about

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

is source in that case ? Are you adding source:XXX for each different tag ? regards m On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> wrote: > On 25-01-16 19:38, Marc Gemis wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> wro

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bicycle highways

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Matthieu Gaillet wrote: > This is however something that has to be discussed on a higher level than > Belgium. Where is this place ? As Glenn wrote, here is a good place to discuss first. When no solution is found, or when you want to hear

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Glenn Plas wrote: > Also, make sure when you create your better OSM bulding, tag it > source:geometry=AGIV (I think to recognise agiv sats). What do I have to do with source:geometry:date in those cases ?

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bicycle highways

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Glenn Plas wrote: > So nothing really special besides description that this is a 'highway' > and width. (and ... foot=no !). Indeed, in Germany you are not allowed to walk on a cycleway (white bicycle on blue background). Even when you get

Re: [OSM-talk] What is 'Attic Data'? or 'Why can't wiki writers use plain language'.

I wonder whether this some expression in German that is translated literally in English. m. On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Dave F wrote: > Hi > > So often I'm put off from delving further into OSM & its uses by the > confusing nature of it's wiki pages. > > A

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Winkelketens / Chain stores

brand:wikidata is already there. On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I can't answer the actual question, but I do want to add that we should add > brand:wikidata and operator:wikidata as well. > > Jo > > Op 27 februari 2016 20:

[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: Cycleway oneway and lane same highway wich tags ?

) - different ideas about bicycle tagging [1], [2], [4] - ideas about extending tagging to sidewalks [3] - Benelux JOSM preset supports [4] - cycle tags on a Dutch map [5] -- Forwarded message -- From: Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-02-25 17:33 GMT+01:00 Subject: Re

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Cycleway oneway and lane same highway wich tags ?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle S2 ? Cycle track on left side and cycle lane on right side of the road. Way A (main road) : highway=*[1] + cycleway:right=lane + bicycle:backward=use_sidepath if usage of cycle track is compulsory Way B (cycleway): highway=cycleway + oneway=yes btw,

[OSM-talk-be] Winkelketens / Chain stores

-- English below -- Hallo, In het buitenland bestaan er al een aantal pagina's die aangeven hoe je winkeltekens moet taggen. Ik dacht nu hetzelfde te doen voor België. [1] Sander was zo vriendelijk om een template te maken om zodat het eenvoudiger is om nieuwe winkelketens toe te voegen. Quick

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Still 296 phone booths in Belgium

tag proximus or belgacom ? > > I seem to remember that a other operator (English ???) try to place public > phone in railway stations and other public places, but do not find info on > the internet about this. > Am I wrong ? > > > Marc Gemis schreef op 23/02/2016 om 7:29: >> &

[OSM-talk-be] Trage wegen reports about a project of sentiers.be

In Dutch: http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=5c29bdaf81c313643f392b1ef=f6cb1e514b=d3a38b28d7 In French: http://www.sentiers.be/2016/02/11/actualisation-de-latlas-des-voiries-communales-coup-denvoi-de-lexperience-pilote/ regards ___ Talk-be mailing

[OSM-talk-be] Still 296 phone booths in Belgium

Seems like we didn't manage the clean up of public telephone cells in Belgium. There are still 296 telephones left. Het lijkt erop dat we er nog niet in geslaagd zijn om de telefooncellen in België te verwijderen. Er zijn er nog 296 gemapped. [out:xml] [timeout:600];

Re: [OSM-talk-be] BE Quarterly Project (Schools) - Go !

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Jo wrote: > I know all the schools in those csv files have an id that can be set in ref, > but that already doesn't work in Wallonia or Brussels. > In the UK they use ref:edubase for the reference. Since the ref cannot be verified in the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] BE Quarterly Project (Schools) - Go !

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jasper Michels wrote: > It was mentioned that there exist free datasets for the flemish part. (and > cant we import the building outlines of Agiv?) > At this moment someone is working on converting the GRB data into something that can be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] BE Quarterly Project (Schools) - Go !

Glenn, thanks a lot for the hard work and the explanation. It looks very promising ! If you want a beta tester on OSX, feel free to contact me Any idea how the "roofs" attached to a building look like after importing ? On the GRB images you see them as areas filled with diagonal lines. Just

Re: [OSM-talk-be] BE Quarterly Project (Schools) - Go !

> assist with that for their BAG import. I think we should look into reusing > that, adapted to the data we have available. > > Polyglot > > 2016-01-21 5:35 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jasper Michels <jaspe

Re: [OSM-talk-be] University tagging

This could be added to the BENELUX preset for JOSM if you want. Just let me know when you agree on the tagging. Or add it yourself to https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/BENELUX :-) regards m On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Ruben Maes wrote: > Thursday 21 January

Re: [OSM-talk-be] University tagging

each of those presents we can add both the vks:level and isced:level tags. m On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Ruben Maes <ru...@janmaes.com> wrote: > Thursday 21 January 2016 15:51:44, Marc Gemis: >> This could be added to the BENELUX preset for JOSM if you want. Just >> l

Re: [OSM-talk-be] BE Quarterly Project (Schools) - Go !

Glenn has just done 1 town. Yesterday I started using his tool to see how it works on a Mac. IMHO We can't do this on a large scale yet, since the procedure is not yet approved by the import mailing list. Wonder who is going to be brave enough this time to try it. m. On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

What's the planning for the import ? * Glenn finishes documentation (although I think it's (almost) ready) * We pass this somehow through the import mailing list ( I fear we cannot avoid this). Sander, you have some experience with this. What do you think ? * We have a face-to-face meeting /

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

So you are saying a need a couple of weeks more to finalise the tool. Then 2-3 weeks discussion on the import mailing list which means we could plan a face-to-face meeting in 2 months ? I think that planning a face-to-face meeting can start now, so people that are interested can keep a day free

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Glenn Plas wrote: >> * splitting a building because the garage is clearly separated on AGIV >> imagery > > You should not have to do that imho, I've never encountered this 'too > much building in between' situation. When the garage is

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Glenn Plas wrote: >> which means we could plan a face-to-face meeting in 2 months ? > > For me it's ok to do this sooner, I really don't want to wait another 2 > months to start on this, summer is coming and this is going to keep me > inside

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

A short question about source:geometry. Should I/we keep it when we modify the building afterwards. I'm thinking of the following cases * In the meantime, part of the building got destroyed * The building got finished in the meantime * straighten the corners * connecting 2 building parts because

Re: [OSM-talk-be] BE Quarterly Project (Schools) - Go !

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Jakka wrote: > Is it allowed to use the same key in it self ? like the example > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/BE_Quarterly_Projects > amenity=parking in amenity=school (area) and the key "leisure" within >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] remote work on Mapathon possible?

If you don't need the introduction, you can always work on the same hot/missing maps task, from wherever you are. The task can be announced on twitter or ... at that moment. You'll miss the fun of meeting other mappers of course. regards m On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Pieter-Jan Pauwels <

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

u...@janmaes.com> wrote: > Thursday 21 January 2016 05:35:11, Marc Gemis: >> At this moment someone is working on converting the GRB data into something >> that can be "easily" imported. >> (...) > > Great that we'll have a more or less complete map of the buildings in

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Agiv import

It's up to the mapper that does the import to check each building individually. It's not different than noticing that a building is partly destroyed on the AGIV imagery and adapting the GRB building according to that. m On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Ruben Maes wrote: >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bicycle highways

The Fiets-o-Strade between Antwerpen en Mechelen is a relation [1]. I don't know who created it. As far as I remember there are "maps" along the route. I think the blue sign [2] is indicating it. For the rest you will only see destination signs for cyclist [3] [1]

Re: [OSM-talk-be] road axes in pedestrian areas

On the help forum, someone asked a similar question the other day: "what can I do to improve pedestrian routing ?" [1] So far, there was only 1 answer: stating "do not add separate lines for sidewalks, improve the algorithm" and pointing to some thesis. Perhaps you can get inspiration from reading

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Mapping Party: infrastructure for the homeless

I noticed that you used amenity=resuse. According to taginfo [1], it is now used 19 times, most of them in Brussels. Would you mind documenting it on the wiki and explaining the meaning of this tag ? Otherwise part of your work might be hard to understand for data consumers. regards m [1]

Re: [OSM-talk] Guides to improve navigation data in OpenStreetMap

Thanks for writing this nice guide. Everything becomes more complex when there are cycle lanes involved. Maybe you could spend a chapter on that as well ? I'm thinking about turn:lanes that should take into account the cycle lanes, as well as permissions for the different lanes in those cases.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: Toll for trucks +3,5ton

n if it wasn't as it is prone to change >> overtime. >> >> Glenn >> >> >> On 16-03-16 20:35, Jasper Michels wrote: >> > Thank you for the answer Marc and Sander. >> > >> > Would have loved to specify the amount, but Sander has a

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

Perhaps Jo is willing to set up a hangout or something similar to explain the mapping in detail. But as a starter you could read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Node_Network_Tagging regards m On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Jakka wrote: > Beginning with survey

Re: [OSM-talk] Guides to improve navigation data in OpenStreetMap

Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes, which describes the ":lanes"- subkey. This page states: "Please be aware that this extension covers all kinds of lanes for all kind of vehicles and is not restricted to motorized traffic." this means that all turn:lanes, change:lanes,

[OSM-talk-be] Mapper in the Spotlight

We're sorry we've published so few interviews with Belgian mappers lately, but here is one with a Dutch mapper: Nick http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/escada/diary/38131 (in English) http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/escada/diary/38132 (in Dutch) regards m

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Temporary Blocker roads

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Ben Laenen wrote: > example put an access=no on a road that's closed for a month, and during that > month someone else makes a dump of the data and now that dump will have an > inaccessible road until a new dump is made, maybe several months

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Name of "domeinbos"

er precies met de > term bedoeld wordt? > > Qua tagging (waar ik niet veel benul van heb...) lijkt "landuse=forest" > correct, met "place=" zie ik niet veel verband. > > Karel > > > On 07-04-16 10:57, Marc Gemis wrote: >> >> How do you map th

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Name of "domeinbos"

n het gebied. >> Maar het belangrijkste is toch wel dat het gemapt wordt en er een naam >> voor bestaat in OSM, ook al is de juiste omvang niet bekend of korrekt. >> >> Meestal zijn er wel kaartjes van de exacte percelen te vinden in studies >> die bvb het INBO doet o

[OSM-talk-be] Name of "domeinbos"

How do you map the name of a "domeinbos" ? I know you can use the name tag, but typically the name applies to a different area than what is tagged as forest. two examples: [1] & [2] Would it be OK to add a node with landuse=forest ? Or a place=locality ? [1]

[OSM-talk-be] Merging way.

I've been fixing walking routes the past few hours and it seems that several people have been merging ways. By merging ways one breaks route relations that only use part of the street. I've been writing a few changeset comments, but I hope to reach a larger audience via this mailing list. So my

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Restriction turn left without traffic sign on pole

I would also add 3 turn restrictions, it's more supported than the change:lanes. I leave it to the reader to find the 3 turn restrictions :-) (assuming the small street on the left is not a oneway street) As for the change lanes. Wouldn't change:lanes=no|no be better ? and for the foreground:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] oorlogsmonument

ey:memorial [4] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial:type 2016-03-26 20:37 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: > volgens taginfo [1] zijn er 73 historic=tank objecten. > > > [1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=tank > > 2016-03-26 12:11 G

Re: [OSM-talk-be] oorlogsmonument

volgens taginfo [1] zijn er 73 historic=tank objecten. [1] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=tank 2016-03-26 12:11 GMT+01:00 Bart Vanherck : > Bij ons in Geel staat sinds kort een legertank aan aan speelbos. > > Hoe kan ik dit het beste taggen? Ik vind zo

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: Toll for trucks +3,5ton

There is a toll-tag [1]. That page recommends toll=no, toll:hgv=yes Is this sufficient ? I don't know whether you want to specify the amount as well. regards m [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:toll On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Jasper Michels wrote: > >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New Brussels-Capital Region Open Data portal

Most likely, yes On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Julien Fastré <jul...@fastre.info> wrote: > I think this is already on this page : > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Belgium > > I think this is enough... did it ? > > Julien > > Le 03/0

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Mapping Party: infrastructure for the homeless

end your time making a webpage (umap or other) that shows those places. just my .5 cent on the approval process m On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Julien Fastré <jul...@fastre.info> wrote: > > > Le 02/03/16 08:45, Marc Gemis a écrit : >> Getting the proposal approved will only br

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Winkelketens / Chain stores

:56 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: > brand:wikidata is already there. > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I can't answer the actual question, but I do want to add that we should add >> brand:wik

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Winkelketens / Chain stores

the category, or collect details allowing people to make > a category". Here it might absolutely make sense to use shop=yes + a list of > items sold. > > Op 2-mrt.-2016 05:50 schreef "Marc Gemis" <marc.ge...@gmail.com>: > >> I am wondering how a Fnac shop should

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >