You don't say what you want to output to but I use the command line
program ogr2ogr (you will need to install all GDAL, I believe -
https://gdal.org/index.html).
Example to convert to CSV:
ogr2ogr.exe -f csv output.csv input.geojson -lco GEOMETRY=AS_XY
You may have to adjust the GEOMETRY
There /may/ be a way using josm's revert changeset.
Load the changeset using the revert changeset tool.
Use filters to select only the required data (start with layer<0).
When you have only the objects you require, select them. Then go to the
revert changeset dialog again & select the 'revet
Could admin transfer this to Talk-GB please.
DaveF
On 27/03/2023 13:51, Ragone, Olivia via talk wrote:
Thank you for providing feedback on some of the edits made by National
Trust staff as part of our organised editing activity, on the
representation of paths. We’d like to apologise that it
On 25/02/2023 21:44, Andy Mabbett wrote:
shop = watch → shop = watches
This could plausibly mean watch as in "monitor" - in other words
"please watch for developments".
No it can't.
DaveF___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Hi
You may wish to take a look at these changesets by a single contributor
to decide if you think these are dubious websites added to tourist
attractions.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Aliaksandr%20Kopyshau/history#map=1/37/3
The one in my locale had poor spelling (translation to
On 19/01/2023 10:00, Marc_marc wrote:
it's funny to find here and in different proposals this justification
I find it fanciful
You don't find tall structures, viewable from miles around useful
markers while out & about? How strange.
DaveF
___
On 19/01/2023 03:03, john whelan wrote:
Should we have a process that says some things should not be mapped?
No.
Next question?
DaveF
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Sorry, but I'm unclear what that detailed story has to do with my point?
DaveF
On 29/11/2022 16:54, John Whelan wrote:
The story of the Ottawa bus stops...
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 28/11/2022 23:48, Tobias Knerr wrote:
we would like to offer data donors a standard legal text that they can
use to make their data available to OSM in such a way that we would
expect it to survive a hypothetical license change.
I'm confused.
If a maintainer of a database wishes to change
Link(s)?
On 30/10/2022 18:47, john whelan wrote:
There are two versions of JOSM available on the Microsoft store. One
is a fork and costs money the other is the kosher version.
It might be helpful if JOSM had a few reviews to make it stand out
from the other version.
Thanks John
Most roads don't have names.
Any comparison has to be done against an authoritative database or on
ground surveying, for the area in which you're searching.
"where the name can be interpolated from neighbouring ways. This allows
to detect and armchair-fix a (small) subset of these cases with
On 25/10/2022 08:42, Warin wrote:
If OSM is about mapping what exists today .. why have the tags that
mean there is nothing left of it?
The main OSM website/database shouldn't. it is for *current* data.
"OpenStreetMap is a place for mapping things that are both /real and
current/"
On 01/06/2021 19:37, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
Why bother with OSM at all then? Just look at a Ordnance Survey map
and use your sentience to find what you're looking for.
OSM is free.
OSM is not a database sink.
DaveF
___
Talk-transit mailing
On 01/06/2021 18:32, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:07 -0400, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 12:38 Dave F via Talk-transit <
talk-transit@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
On 01/06/2021 16:11, Christopher Parker wrote:
On 6/1/2021 10:54 AM, Dave F via Talk-transit
On 01/06/2021 18:07, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 12:38 Dave F via Talk-transit
<mailto:talk-transit@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
On 01/06/2021 16:11, Christopher Parker wrote:
>
> On 6/1/2021 10:54 AM, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote:
ut route relations, OSM shows where you can get on the
train/vehicle, but not where you can go
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, 10:58 Dave F via Talk-transit
<mailto:talk-transit@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
What's wrong with consulting a timetable?
Maps show you where you can go, timetab
What's wrong with consulting a timetable?
Maps show you where you can go, timetables tell you when .
DaveF
On 01/06/2021 01:18, Michael Tsang wrote:
> I think you are missing the point that GB is not a city.
> Cities are densly pack and urban transport systems reflect this. In
London tube
For the last few years I've added/deleted & maintained Britain's railway
stations. All National Rail stations (currently 2571) have the Station's
3 digit CRS code (ref:crs=*). This is the public facing code which
allows routing developers to link to NR webpages which provide more
*accurate*
As others have said, this data doesn't really belong in OSM.
It's too transient, too complicated to maintain.
GB timetables are officially updated every 6 months, but services vary
on an ad-hoc basis. This previous year being a good example. How
detailed would your system be? Would you adjust
That's weird.
Save for some tactile paving what's the difference between North & South?
DaveF
On 10/12/2020 14:08, Tony Shield wrote:
/Are there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually
banned?
/
Unfortunately yes - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827379295
Quite clear
I believe you're incorrect.
Cycleways can be shared use with pedestrians, & almost always are in the UK.
Cycleway/footway/path tags are not based on usage figures. Cycleway
allows for two modes of transport, footway allows one. Likewise
'bridleway' allows for three modes -
On 08/12/2020 12:36, nathan case wrote:
but instead setting as disused:highway. This is what I tend to do when the PROW
route is clearly inaccessible from aerial imagery (e.g. due to new buildings,
or rivers).
IMO, this is bad mapping.
Just because one person concludes it isn't used by
On 08/12/2020 12:42, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote:
Ah sorry, I shall remove it then Robert. I have drawn it freehand based on
what I'd seen on their site as a right of way. Presumably then, if there's
no established path, I can never add it to OSM because the definitive map
is my only source for
lines drawn on top of
Copyrighted Ordnance Survey base-maps, which means they're off-limits
for use in OSM.
Do you have evidence of this being the case? Has someone from OS (or
anyone outside OSM) stated that?
Dave F
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk
move it in this case.
Both bicycle & walking on a bridleway are designated.
The surface tag is a useful addition for paths.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
Dave F
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstree
Some of the properly installed versions I've tagged as gates - The
electricity passes through a bungy cable & is connected with a metal
hook at one end which is encased in a rubber handle allowing the walker
to unhook it & pass through.
I usually only map the ones where I know, or it looks
On 21/11/2020 18:35, Edward Bainton wrote:
Thanks all for these ideas. The path is marked as shared, but only in
the middle of the park
HI
There's a misconception that highway=cycleway implies an automatic
authority over other path users. This is untrue It's just a hierarchy of
the number of different transport modes permitted to use it. Similarly,
highway=residential permits motor vehicles as well as bicycles &
On 19/11/2020 20:57, Brian Prangle wrote:
Dump for external databases? Surely not!
FHRS?
Well that's why I've been trying to clean up FHRS tags.
The only tag that should really exist is the ID code which refers /back/
to the external database.
UPRN? USRN?
I'm struggling to see the
yone with valid
reasons for not removing these tags?
DaveF
On 19/11/2020 16:49, Martin Wynne wrote:
On 19/11/2020 16:24, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
>
> Anybody know what featdesc & featcode refer to? Local authority
> references?
Hi Dave,
Sorry about poor formatting, cop
Hi
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/10kw
Anybody know what featdesc & featcode refer to? Local authority
references? Appears to be only rivers & woods.These are the only
examples in the UK
The contributor who added them hasn't responded.
DaveF
___
I wouldn't have mapped that as any kind of road at all. From aerial
imagery the west end is blocked by a container & vegetation suggests
it's not been used for years.
On 16/11/2020 11:18, Mat Attlee wrote:
There is a service road in Homerton that I noticed several different
routing apps
On 14/11/2020 12:39, Donald Noble wrote:
Firstly, I have seen a few buildings that have an AED pictogram sign
outside, suggesting that there is a defibrillator inside. Is this
considered sufficient 'on the ground' evidence to add to the map.
I'd say yes. Add access &/or note tag to clarify
On 30/10/2020 15:28, ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB wrote:
Hello,
It has come to my attention that the "Town Plan" map from 1944-1967 in
NLS is available freely.
Link to this on NLS?
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 29/10/2020 06:41, Simon Poole wrote:
Am 29.10.2020 um 00:17 schrieb Dave F:
iD editor attracts a hell of a lot of "WTFs", doesn't it? I mean,
even its most ardent fan must occasionally raise a Roger Moore eyebrow.
bhuousel has taken the presumptive decision that the contributor'
On 27/10/2020 03:56, Bryce Cogswell wrote:
I agree it’s a little counterintuitive for experienced users but I understand
the rationale: If you’re splitting a building (closed way) how is the result
valid unless it’s converted to a multipolygon?
The editor is presuming the splitting of the
finished
with it and you could simplify, particularly when you are trying to
get the user to save often and early. So the simplification for the iD
user comes at the expense of wtf's of everybody else.
Simon
Am 27.10.2020 um 02:05 schrieb Dave F via talk:
Hi
I don't use iD editor much,
Hi
I don't use iD editor much, but I've just discovered it auto-converts
closed polygons which are split (Shortcut Key = X) into MP relations.
I'm struggling to comprehend a logical reason for this. Is there one? If
there's been a previous discussion which I've missed please post a link.
public_transport=platform and highway=bus_stop are different schemas.
Please don't confuse the two.
When mapping using the much more prevalent highway=bus_stop there is no
requirement for bus=* as it's obviously explicit.
DaveF
On 11/07/2020 06:33, Agustin Rissoli wrote:
What are your
All the OSM 'leaderboard' sites I've seen are based on quantity.
OSM needs more quality mappers.
There's a page which tabled the number of changesets created by
individual contributors per day/week/month. I believe this led to a few
anal retentives quickly creating one changeset for every
About the only change I've made in years of mapping 'non-mini'
roundabouts is to split the oneway=yes flare 'V' into two segments.
JOSM validation started flagging the junction node of the V as too
tight a bend, which I suppose makes sense.
This is a good example of how routing is
There is a lot of garbage in OSM due to those creating routers being too
lazy to write a few lines of code, or even use common sense.
However, in this case I believe it's other contributors who think, for
reasons that escape me, routers require it.
Routing software must be of a poor standard
All
The most important thing to do in situations like this is to contact the
LA responsible & ask them to clear it.
As I said on the preceding discussion of this topic in Talk, many of
these descriptions are subjective. What you or I may consider completely
impassible, others could be
On 28/09/2020 17:53, Dan S wrote:
Hi Rodrigo
I think Loomio is designed
for the purpose of making good decisions together:
Come again? Why do you think "good decisions" can't be made here? What
do those who don't wish to join yet another off-shoot do?
DaveF
On 28/09/2020 15:29, Rodrigo Díez Villamuera wrote:
Thanks all of you for your messages.
As a new joiner, I could not ask for more than other members engaging
in such a passionate way :)
It's fair to say that there is no clear consensus of whether the
proposal, in its current form, is
Three things to note:
SO3166-1=GB is misnomered & includes Northern Ireland. (As I found out,
some contributors there get annoyed with UK wide edits). You may want to
use area(id:3600058447,3600058437,3600058446); // England Wales Scotland
instead.
Many pubs are mapped as ways/relations so
On 25/09/2020 17:53, Andy Townsend wrote:
On 25/09/2020 17:43, Dave F via talk wrote:
Nick's description is "overgrown, unclear, prone to flooding"
These are all subjective interpretations.
There are many official PROW's in those conditions.
(for the benefit of people outside
On 28/09/2020 10:56, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 10:10 +0100, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 28/09/2020 10:00, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Remember: OSM is not an IT project.
Indeed not. But this is also a good example of the truism that OSM
is
not a map, it's a database. Having the right
On 28/09/2020 10:00, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Rodrigo,
On 27.09.20 17:28, Rodrigo Díez Villamuera wrote:
After some time using OSM as a user, I decided to make my first step as
a contributor, hence this email and the proposal inside.
If your first idea of "how to contribute to OSM" is "how to
On 27/09/2020 19:35, Andrew Hain wrote:
Keep Right flags web links that have gone offline.
Unfortunately it doesn't really do that. After a discussion with the
developer I found out it tests whether a server in central Europe has a
link to the UK URLs not if the actual link is current. I was
Nick's description is "overgrown, unclear, prone to flooding"
These are all subjective interpretations.
There are many official PROW's in those conditions.
It doesn't mean they're "abandoned" or "disused".
It doesn't mean someone isn't prepared to wade or hack their way through.
Accurate
The first two bullet points are poorly worded:
building=house is "where individual people live".
"There is no need to split residential landuse into individual plots."
if that means the actual tag landuse=residential, then I'd probably
agree, but there is nothing wrong with this level of
I think highway should be reverted to cycleway. There's a
misunderstanding that highway=cycleway implies priority to bicycle
riders, when it actually relates just to the number of transport modes
which can use it. Bridleway equates to three modes: walkers, bikes & horses.
DaveF
On 03/09/2020
I already answered your last point.
Good to see the give way is against the motor vehicles.
On 02/09/2020 22:37, Lester Caine wrote:
On 02/09/2020 19:00, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
I don't know the area. but they look like the existing posts to me.
Has the cycle path been realigned around them
I don't know the area. but they look like the existing posts to me. Has
the cycle path been realigned around them to provide better vision
splays/ stopping room to motorists?
If your wishing to socially distance, Sunday lunchtime/afternoon seems a
strange time to do it.
On 23/08/2020 13:43, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Hello everyone,
Some of you are aware of this, but we (David Greenwood of TrekView and
myself) are organising a Panorama Mapping Party on September 13th
Just caught up with this thread, & I'm unsure if it's a joke.
If there are any problems/disagreements with names in OSM then surely
the same problem occurs in Wikiland?
DaveF.
On 09/08/2020 09:25, pangoSE wrote:
I suggest we create a roadmap for deprecating of storing and updating
names in
Too transient/inaccurate for me, personally. Even my local LA can't
publish an accurate list.
Anyway, I'm too busy mapping garden fences in the hope of upsetting
sensibilities.
DaveF
On 19/08/2020 21:10, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone considered using the Eat out to Help out data
On 13/08/2020 15:41, Simon Still wrote:
So my understanding is that OSM normally only maps what’s actually on
the ground rather than what might be shown on a map (and there was
some discussion recently about this -
https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-gb@openstreetmap.org/msg19303.html)
This
What is it?
On 12/08/2020 16:54, SK53 wrote:
OpenRoads from the Ordnance Survey contains a field containing the
toid for the street name. I wonder if we should include these
alongside usrn & uprn. They may be more useful than either for
gathering complex roads which share a name.
Try this (using your user name)
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/WvG
[bbox:{{bbox}}];
(
nw(newer:"{{date:1Day}}");
-
nw(user:UserName);
);
out meta geom({{bbox}});
It highlights individual entities instead of vague boxes.
Change nw to nwr to return relations & change the date to return older
Where was the discussion. Do you have a link?
I think the relation of the 'route' should be purely the ways & if
there's an actual requirement*, the signs should be included as a part
of a super relation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Super-Relation
* Is there a requirement? Doesn't the
On 21/07/2020 17:30, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 21/07/2020 16:57, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
Is the National Chargepoint Registry data open for OSM now? If not
somebody should write a nice enough letter?
It is open, it's OGL now. But it's not reliable enough for an
unfiltered bulk import;
On 21/07/2020 12:10, Chris Hill wrote:
Leccy car drivers need to know if the point is working. Apps from the
charge point suppliers and from others such as Zapmap try to keep
drivers informed about the availability and condition of the point.
OSM doesn't have that info and can't update it in
1538 nationwide.
Use this to see what other tags contributors are adding.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Wia
DaveF
On 21/07/2020 11:58, Mark Goodge wrote:
Do we map electric vehicle charging points? If not, should we?
None of the ones in my town are on OSM, at the moment. I could add
them,
The whole point of route relations is to allow multiple routes to be
added to an individual object.
On 17/07/2020 02:15, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-transit wrote:
In the USA bus stops (flag stops) are located for the most part at
named intersections, that is at where the street
sign is.
Hi
Did you obtain them from their website? If so, could you post the link?
What's the content? Just location co-ordinates?
DaveF
On 15/07/2020 14:00, o...@poppe.dev wrote:
Hey all,
I just accidentally found that the Pub next to "curious 20602512" is operated
by a chain with quite a few
I'm getting this after selecting the Search Entry option:
https://snipboard.io/7J6Eb0.jpg
Latest JOSM version
Any ideas?
On 26/06/2020 10:45, o...@poppe.dev wrote:
Hey Tony,
as I'm from the other side of the Channel, I doubt that there's
someone from the UK community that knows me well
As the OSM entity has to already contain the FHRS:ID tag it limits the
usefulness of this plugin. Won't most have address data added when
contributors initially add the FHRS tag? I certainly do.
What would be useful is a way to search the LA's database for retailers
which don't have a FHRS
June 5, 2020 8:43 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk
:
On 05/06/2020 13:45, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>
> when the river stream comes to the bridge can you split and add
tunnel ?
There can't be both a tunnel and bridge. It's one or the other. This
goes for
On 12/06/2020 15:32, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
I am confused,
are you telling me being in chicago, where i can go to the place i am
editing, not relying on satellite view
which is behind by at least 7 month or more here, i should be messing
around in London.
If you have information
On 12/06/2020 23:00, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
Friday, June 12, 2020 10:20 AM -05:00 from James
:
No they shouldn't, mapping roads in northern Canada, your bbox can
become quite large quickly as mapping logging roads/dirt roads is
quick and easy, but span over
On 12/06/2020 14:44, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 12.06.20 15:22, Dave F via talk wrote:
There is a lot of negativity about large changsets, but assessment of
them should be based on quality, not quantity.
Yes, we're not discussing a popup that says "You dumbass, why did you
create a
Yes please - I am using Osmcha to look at changesets around me and i
have a high number of changesets which span half Europe and thus
intersect with the area i am looking at.
Changeset envelopes which span more than 100s of km² are broken.
In which case, isn't it really OSMCha which is
On 12/06/2020 12:00, Frederik Ramm wrote:
and very rarely intentional.
Point 1:
This is what's always confused me. I occasionally look into world wide
changeset & it's often one spurious object in another continent, which
the contributor can't explain.
I'm unsure if it's one specific
On 08/06/2020 18:12, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 8. Jun 2020, at 16:15, Dave F wrote:
Good Lord!
That has both tunnel & bridge tags on the same object!
This is not what is being discussed here.
it’s in the secondary thread that you started here ;-)
No Ma
ing, with the
suggestion
add a bridge or tunnel.
Monday, June 8, 2020 5:13 AM -05:00 from Martin
Koppenhoefer :
Am Sa., 6. Juni 2020 um 18:02 Uhr schrieb Dave F
via talk http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mai
Good Lord!
That has both tunnel & bridge tags on the same object!
This is not what is being discussed here.
DaveF
On 08/06/2020 11:10, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am Sa., 6. Juni 2020 um 18:02 Uhr schrieb Dave F via talk
mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org>>:
Do you have an example?
Provide a link to the changeset.
DaveF
On 07/06/2020 14:07, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
IF someone, not local, relying on satellite views, goes after my
good faith edit, based on my on the ground
surveillance thinks my edit was wrong trying to fix broken polygon’s,
that are making
from a phone
On 5. Jun 2020, at 15:44, Dave F via talk wrote:
There can't be both a tunnel and bridge. It's one or the other. This goes for
all scenarios, including roads.
you can have both, but it is rare...
and it depends on your definitions of course (e.g. you might call it an
enclosed
On 05/06/2020 13:45, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
when the river stream comes to the bridge can you split and add tunnel ?
There can't be both a tunnel and bridge. It's one or the other. This
goes for all scenarios, including roads.
DaveF
On 26/05/2020 09:19, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
sorry, my fault, it is bicycle_road=yes in addition to highway=*
(usually residential)
and it isn't a cycleway as it is a regular road that is either blocked
for most motor vehicles,
Then that's a cycleway. Irrelevant of construction (width,
As you done it over (far too) many edits, could you provide a comparison
list of amendments here.
DaveF.
On 24/05/2020 11:10, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
I just added some example at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
and improved existing one.
Review, and improving edits
On 28/04/2020 08:45, Robin Däneke wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have lately been thinking about somehow reworking (or giving a new push to)
the current p_t:v2 scheme.
Especially for the fact, that, since it was first proposed and accepted, not a
lot has changed in which tags are rendered, how
Are you sure it's upto date?:
Page last reviewed: 15 December 2016
Next review due: 15 December 2019
The 'GPs' is corrupted with Chines symbols.
On 16/04/2020 17:18, Mike Baggaley wrote:
The data at https://data.gov.uk/dataset/e373eb6a-fffd-48e5-b306-71eb17f97af2/pharmacies looks like
an
Thanks for the expansion of Type Shortcuts. It's going to save a lot of
typing, especially with 'count'.
DaveF
On 14/04/2020 06:09, Roland Olbricht wrote:
Dear all,
I'm back with providing updates. After more than a year I'm proud to
present a new release. This release provides some smaller
Why country codes? OSM is geospatially aware.
On 09/04/2020 14:31, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 14:26, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 09:21, Tony OSM wrote:
If the data is to be in the public domain the next step has to be tagging.
Do
Sorry, could hardly understand a word she said. Gave up after 2 minutes.
A brief intro about who you are & the purpose of the podcast as well as
properly introducing your guest would be useful.
DaveF
.
On 09/04/2020 13:34, Robert Bell via talk wrote:
Hello everyone I'm starting a OSM themed
Bedfordshire, and is on the left hand side of the road,
orientated for buses heading NW along Station Road as they come off the busway.
So yes, it is incorrect in OSM.
Regards,
Stuart Reynolds
for traveline south east and anglia
On 22 Mar 2020, at 14:17, Dave F via Talk-GB
mailto:talk-gb
Hi
If you're in the Dunstable/Luton area would you be able to clarify if
this way is used as a regular bus route and if the bus stop at the
Western end exists?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218924564
The only routes I've located so far, continue along the Busway.
There's a contributor
On 21/03/2020 21:11, Paul Johnson wrote:
Anybody paid to contribute to OSM *must* be capable of setting
the example, as far as I'm concerned.
There appears to be some kind of snobbery infiltrating OSM. Very
disappointing.
DaveF
___
talk mailing
On 21/03/2020 20:59, Greg Troxel wrote:
This really seems unfair.
When someone maps for OSM because they want to, they have goals and a
typically a good attitude about community norms.
When someone is a a paid mapper, their goals come from the person who is
paying them, and they don't
In my area, AL are adding legitimate data which helps improve the
quality of the OSM database. I believe they make the same amount of
errors as any other contributors, including experienced ones.
Unsure why he thinks OSMF should be keeping an eye on contributors
purely because they're paid.
I
On 15/02/2020 12:08, Borbus wrote:
I've long suspected that local councils and other government bodies are
giving data directly to Google.
They're given to everyone. Look at the planning applications. They often
have street names in the documents. Many OSMers are sensible enough not
to add
On 06/02/2020 16:49, Phillip Barnett wrote:
And here is the email from the guy who did the original mapping, the last time
this came up, including his reasoning for the amenity Tag rather than building
tag https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017457.html
Note the time
On 06/02/2020 15:48, Brian Prangle wrote:
"OSM is not beholden to data consumers.
They take the data 'as is'. That includes any amendments
My planned amendment can always be reversed if there is a valid reason.
Upsetting CU isn't one"
Not a great way to build a community when the data user
On 31/01/2020 23:49, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
Hi
Over the past few months I've been sorting & adding detail to the UK's
National Rail railway stations so that OSM has the correct amount.
As it's been a week, with no objections, I'm proceeding with the
amendments. I'm keeping a
ers,
Jerry
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 15:15, Dave F via Talk-GB
wrote:
On 04/02/2020 14:28, Dan S wrote:
Hi Dave,
I agree with what you suggest. Can we be a bit precise though about
what you propose? You're proposing to remove amenity=university from
building=university in Cambridge, and make
On 05/02/2020 20:06, marc marc wrote:
Hello,
I've now moved to tagging as many of them them as 'fixme'
nice to highlight the issue.
but why not fixing it ?
As stated previously, it's not the responsibility of the person spotting
errors to fix it, especially if it's been performed
On 05/02/2020 15:45, Mario Frasca wrote:
hi all,
I am in no position to take care of the amount of instances of this
practice, and fix them
You shouldn't be expected to. Contributors who make errors should fix them.
I've signalled it to their editors, or to their leaders, but
apparently
1 - 100 of 1486 matches
Mail list logo
