Re: [OSM-talk] bot proposal: shop values cleanup (low use values only, 1 used 250 times, three over 100 times, many used less)

tice you will gain detail in actual use. There is probably a sweet spot somewhere in the middle, enough detail to allow to differentiate "important" differences while not adding too much detail overwhelming anybody who wants to use the data. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.o

Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline update process seems to be broken - major costline change near the Gulf of Ob

e coastline change in > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126200089 Thanks. I have manually "unfrozen" the processing now. We'll probably have some other bad edits that make it through this way, but at least the big one is avoided. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https

Re: [OSM-talk] I’m running for OSMF board and I’ve set up office hours for questions

ons of the ODbL between OSM/the community vs. Facebook are involved. But you would not have a conflict of interest over anything "beyond the ODbL". So by framing the issue this way you argued yourself out of your conflict of interest problem in this issue. Very clever! [1] https://en.wik

Re: [OSM-talk] Updating of land/water polygons (based on natural=coastline) is too slow and unreliable

rently available on > https://osmdata.openstreetmap.de - so that mistakes do not lead to > multi-week waits for new polygons? Right now the last update was 11/11/2020 > - ten days ago. > > Is there any way of getting updates more often than once a day in the > best-case scenar

Re: [OSM-talk] Bad coastline edits in Sweden

list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-de] YouTube Account "OpenStreetMap Deutschland"

Association - https://trufi- > > association.org > > > > Ein Gag zu Hamsterkäufen: https://klopapier.mapdiscover.org id="-x- > > evo-selection-end-marker"> > > ___ > > Talk-de mailing list > > Talk-de@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists

Re: [Talk-de] boundarys / river als boundary / admin_level?

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:23:07PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:32:25PM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote: > > > besorgt - Problem ist das entgegen der Doku die durch > > > das ST_Simplify doch kleiner werden und schneiden können. Muss man > > &g

Re: [Talk-de] boundarys / river als boundary / admin_level?

;smart"-Strategie benutzt, dann ist auch die Grenze selbst garantiert drin. Vereinfachte Grenzen machen das Ganze etwas schneller, aber nicht viel. Und dann musste Dich nicht mit Buffern oder so rumärgern. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] boundarys / river als boundary / admin_level?

ich in dem Fall nicht, aber da kann man dem Osmium > keinen Vorwurf machen. Osmium kannste eh keinen Vorwurf machen, wenn dann Osmosis :-) Florian: Warum nimmste nicht einfach Osmium, das ist auch noch einfacher: osmium tags-filter detmold-regbez-latest.osm.pbf a/boundary=administrative -

[OSM-talk] Coastline/Icesheet extracts moving to new server

site (yet) and we are trying to gauge interest. Some more background here: https://blog.jochentopf.com/2019-03-07-the-new-osmdata-service.html Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing

Re: [OSM-talk] We're erasing our history in wiki

finding and working with what we need now. > Thank internet gods for the Internet Archive, Not the gods but some good people who had a good idea. Let them do their job and keep the history and lets do our job and keep the momentum in the project instead of spending our time looking

Re: [OSM-talk] An Archive namespace for the OSM wiki?

nd. Except that I expect to find 10 useful pages, not 5. If the outdated pages were not there, who knows what useful pages I might have found! Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailin

Re: [OSM-talk] An Archive namespace for the OSM wiki?

rst. Might be okay for you and me because we have been around long enough to see quickly what's interesting and what isn't. But if you are not familiar with OSM this is daunting. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 __

Re: [OSM-talk] An Archive namespace for the OSM wiki?

SM itself, we allow anybody to delete anything there, too, and it seems to work out mostly. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] An Archive namespace for the OSM wiki?

/Name_finder > > -- > Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten > ausgenommen) > I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists) > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@op

Re: [OSM-talk] Missing day replicate

deleting that > file, osmosis would make a new one and the problem went away. I guess its time to ditch Osmosis und switch to Osmium/PyOsmium for these tasks... Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Missing day replicate

lk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > https://munin.openstreetmap.org/problems.html#critical > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https

Re: [Talk-de] Tag zu Id-referenzierten Ways zufügen?

Da gibts viele Möglichkeiten. Z.B. ein kleines PyOsmium-Skript. Oder Du schreibst ein kleines Skript, was mit "osmium getid" die Ways rausfriemelt, als OPL speichert und darin den Tag ändert und alles wieder zusammensetzt. Ein bischen programmieren wirst Du aber schon müssen. Jochen -- Joche

Re: [OSM-talk] Ground truth for non-physical objects

e always corner cases. But that's no reason to discredit the rule. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-de] Illegale Feuerstelle

ht eher nicht z.B.), wie die beobachtete Nutzung durch Leute vor Ort ist usw. Und ja, da macht man Dinge auch mal falsch. Aber das ist okay, weil andere Mapper nach mir kommen und Dinge korrigieren können. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___

Re: [Talk-de] Illegale Feuerstelle

cht sicher bin. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] Autobahnkilometer.ch

lprogramm was bei libosmium dabei ist) ergibt: Length: 3069.67 km Durch zwei geteilt sind das ca. 1535 km, was viel besser passt. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ Talk-de mailing lis

Re: [OSM-talk] no_feature_tag_nodes

on the bottom right). I was looking through the "Addresses" view because you mentioned something with "address nodes" trying to figure out what you meant... Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 __

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

se. > > * Query authors can easily search for it to see why they showed up in the > > query result, and fix the original query > > > > The biggest problem is the tag name, any suggestions? > > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Multipolygon relations and disjunct geometries

ipolygons. But with the new-style multipolygons interpretation, the tags from a collections of objects are *never* aggregated into a larger whole. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list t

Re: [Talk-de] Relation zu Poly-File aus PBF

osmium getid planet.osm.pbf -r 1234 -o rel.osm.pbf die Relation rausholen, die als Grenze dienen soll. Dann den Extract machen: osmium extract planet.osm.org -p rel.osm.pbf -o ausschnitt.osm.pbf Eine Poly-Datei brauchste nimmer, osmium kann direkt die OSM-Datei mit der Relation verwenden. Joche

Re: [OSM-talk] Multipolygon fixing effort done

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:54:44PM +0200, Christoph Hormann wrote: > On Tuesday 29 August 2017, Jochen Topf wrote: > > > > > Would the number of visible problems in the map due to dropping > > > broken geometries now, after the fixing effort, be low enough so >

Re: [OSM-talk] Multipolygon fixing effort done

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:10:47PM +0200, Christoph Hormann wrote: > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:10:47 +0200 > From: Christoph Hormann <o...@imagico.de> > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Multipolygon fixing effort done > > On Tuesday 29 August 2017, J

[OSM-talk] Multipolygon fixing effort done

We have completed the 7-months effort to switch away from old-style multipolygons and fix a lot of broken (multi)polygons. More about this on my blog: https://blog.jochentopf.com/2017-08-28-polygon-fixing-effort-concluded.html Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

might not see as similar enough to the OpenStreetMap trademark. I am sure you have the best intentions of defending OSM against the big bad conglomerates, but I think the best defense is having a large and open community and eco-system, one where you don't have to ask for permission before y

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

stand you correctly that I can have a software with the name OpenStreetMap in the title in a github repo and it doesn't fall under this policy? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

community members have the same restrictions on what they can actually do than the outside people have. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

have to get licenses and actually do, we are looking at at least several hundreds of projects (There are nearly 3000 repositories on Github that have "openstreetmap" in their name or description). Can the OSMF even handle this? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.joch

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

n if nobody really minds them using this name) to make this stick. So just ignoring some violations and fighting others isn't possible. Which opens the whole question of whether the OSMF is organizationally and financially in a position to actually do this fighting? If not, why have this policy?

Re: [Talk-de] Ich verzeifle daran eine .osc-Datei zu filtern

denn hier? So wie ich das verstanden habe, sind es ja nur ein paar POIs, die Du importieren willst, das sollte nicht wirklich sehr aufwändig sein. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] Ich verzeifle daran eine .osc-Datei zu filtern

Neuimport durchlaufen lassen oder so. Das macht es viel einfacher. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] Ich verzeifle daran eine .osc-Datei zu filtern

am Ende erreichen? Wenn das Ziel ist, rauszufinden, wo es überall Änderungen bestimmter Art gegeben hast, dann reichen die .osc-Dateien nicht als Datenquelle aus. Du kannst Dir mal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Augmented_Diffs anschauen, vielleicht hilft Dir das weiter.

Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems

On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote: > > How difficult would it be to add this to OSM inspector? Not everybody has > > Postgres running, and is able to use osm2pgsql. Yes, there is documentation, > > but it requires some technical skills. Also, it would

Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems

n most cases this simply means that there should be no tags on the ways at all. Of course you should still check all cases against sat images. For instance, sometimes the whole relation can be removed and just a simple closed way be used if there are no inner w

Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:47:36PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote: > On 30-06-2017 21:21, Jochen Topf wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:16:40PM +0200, Frank Steggink wrote: > > > Maybe I'm not understanding it, but in the OSM inspector [1] I just see > > >

Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems

he shortcut wasn't so short after all, whining that you don't have the manpower to fix it. That can't be the excuse. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems

of the data has to work around this or handle the complaints. * The Canadian community steps up and fixes the data, automatically or manually. * We ask the Data Working Group to remove the broken import. Jochen On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote: > Date: Thu, 22

[Talk-de] Elbe-Labe-Meeting 2017

Details gibt es unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Elbe-Labe-Meeting_2017 Wir laden alle OSMer ein, dabei zu sein. Da der Platz begrenzt ist, ist eine Vorregistrierung erforderlich. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688

[Talk-ca] Multipolygon problems

://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-June/078203.html and this issue https://github.com/osmlab/fixing-polygons-in-osm/issues/36 . News of the effort are posted regularly to https://github.com/osmlab/fixing-polygons-in-osm/issues/15 . Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https

Re: [Talk-de] osmconvert und nested relations

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:04:27AM +0200, Christoph Hormann wrote: > On Friday 16 June 2017, Jochen Topf wrote: > > > > Es gibt da eine Tendenz immer komplexere Dinge zu mappen, ohne dass > > irgendwer diese Daten auch sinnvoll nutzt. Auf der einen Seite ist es > > ja

Re: [Talk-de] osmconvert und nested relations

chte. Siehe http://docs.osmcode.org/osmium/latest/osmium-extract.html . Normalerweise werden nur multipolygon-Relationen vervollständigt, aber man kann auch sagen, dass das auch für die Grenzen gelten soll. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org htt

Re: [Talk-de] osmconvert und nested relations

werten, das ist schwierig und kann selbst bei kleinen Änderungen erhebliche Auswirkungen haben. Da muss man schon viel genauer hinsehen, was sinnvoll ist und was nicht. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 _

[OSM-talk] Old-style multipolygon cleanup is done!

don't know yet, that they shouldn't do that, but that's not a big problem. So that part of the great (multi)polygon fixing effort is done. Huge thanks to everybody involved! But there are still geometry errors to fix. Find more information here: http://area.jochentopf.com/ Jochen -- Jochen Topf

Re: [Talk-us] Fixing Multipolygons

fixing-polygons-in-osm/issues with specific information about the OSM objects that are rendered incorrectly. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstre

[Talk-us] Fixing Multipolygons

can see on the map at http://area.jochentopf.com/map/index.html most of the old-style multipolygons now left are from some large-scale imports, including some in the US. We need your help in cleaning this up! I you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org

Re: [Talk-ko] Broken (multi)polygons in Korea

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 02:46:30PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote: > in my newest batch of Maproulette challenges, I have included a special > challenge for Korea, because there were so many problems there. > > I encourage everbody to help: > http://area.jochentopf.com/fixing.html#dup

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:41:38AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 03:56:43PM +1000, nwastra wrote: > > I am unsure what is the preferred way or best practice to tag the source > > for multipolygons. > > I currently put the source on the relation with all

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

sense. We can not track every source for every node, way, or relation or the parts of them for every tiny change that somebody does. In the end most data will have multiple sources and figuring out what came from what can only be done going through the changeset tags, not by looking at the tags

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons, some notes

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:15:47AM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 06:27:05AM +0100, Andreas Vilén wrote: > > It's not up to me to decide if this data is to be deleted or not. If > > you want to do that, raise the question with each respective country's > >

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons, some notes

community on this topic and that the Swedish community had decided they wanted to keep the data. So I thought this issue was settled. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing

[OSM-talk] Broken multipolygons in South Korea

ly related to some kind of import. I have taken those out of the challenges I am generating, because I wanted to contact the OSM community there first. Anybody here who has connections to South Korea and/or knows about what's going on there? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

s just a subset of the old-style polygons. Currently I am concentrating on actually broken polygons, the old-style polygons are next and I will create challenges for them, too. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 _

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 10:50:41AM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > On 4 Mar 2017, at 08:49, Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org> wrote: > > > > Looking at the graphs on http://area.jochentopf.com/stats you can see > > that the number of (multi)polygons is grow

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

com/osmlab/fixing-polygons-in-osm/issues/15 Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

ngs look then. And maybe when there are less cases we can better see specific problems creeping up that can be solved by improving editors etc. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing lis

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

lenges in the works that will cover all multipolygon problems. This is just a matter of me rolling out those challenges a few at a time so the community can concentrate on one problem before tackling the next one. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31

Re: [OSM-talk] Spam reporting

k for OSM. Not being able to report problems is frustrating to users. The whole question of who decides what is spam and what isn't is a bit besides the point here, isn't it? Obviously somebody is already handling this as you mention and it works. But what would help is a

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:44:18PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 02/21/2017 05:40 PM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > Find all challenges and instructions here: > > http://area.jochentopf.com/fixing.html > > My OCD complains about the typo before the challenge links, plea

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 04:20:53PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote: > There are a lot of (multi)polygons in OSM that are broken in one way or > another. And we have to fix them. While some of the broken ones appear > on the map just fine, some don't appear and some mess up the map. And > s

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

of a link to an example? > > I guess Florian ment geometries like this: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460032394 > > There are indeed plenty of these in "less populated" areas, > especially areas with round buildings... Probably the result of some HOT mapping

Re: [OSM-talk] Maproulette problems?

aproulette2 . I just opened an issue there to say that there is no contact info. :-) Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

l" polygons you are talking about might not show up or show up wrong on the map because of the errors they contain that the renderer is trying to fix and doing so in the wrong way. We are doing all this to improve the accuracy of the map! Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

e different everywhere. I'd rather have more specific challenges addressing exactly one problem, for instance "Broken multipolygons of certain types of landcover data imported from Corinne in Sweden". That is something I can extract from OSM data and that I can explain to people how to fix aft

[OSM-talk] Fixing broken multipolygons

ew at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas ) Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Taginfo detecting wiki problems

Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Taglists support for rendering examples

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 07:09:05PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote: > I have opened an issue: > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2430 Thanks, nebulon42, for fixing this. Everybody encountering problems with the icons can now simple re-import them into the wiki. There is n

Re: [OSM-talk] addr:interpolation and data consumers

It is here like with everything in OSM: There is a trend towards more detail. If you have more detailed information, great. If not, it is better than nothing. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ t

Re: [OSM-talk] leaky coastline, auckland?

works fine. > any suggestions what might be going wrong, or other checkers i might use? If the OSM Inspector says, the coastline is okay, it most likely is. The coastline check is very picky. Sounds like a data problem in Osmand to me. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org ht

Re: [OSM-talk] Taglists support for rendering examples

On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 03:44:56PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +0100, nebulon42 wrote: > > Both notations are correct and I have deliberately chosen the latter > > one. The first one may be the right one for the problem you are tryi

Re: [OSM-talk] Taglists support for rendering examples

ne. Can you elaborate? What was your problem? Maybe we can find a solution that works for everybody? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.opens

[OSM-talk] Taglists support for rendering examples

. I am trying to do the next step here, not change everything in one go.) With this change the taglists can be made to look exactly like the old, manually created ones (for instance on the MapFeatures page). Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org https://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 __

Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page on wiki

pretation of this > data. But it is the style that people use to check their edits. I just see this as "giving people what they want". The current Map Feature page shows that there are people who thought this was a good idea, otherwise they wouldn't have gone through the consider

Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page on wiki

Hi! User "Wuzzy" did a huge amount of work related to this discussion here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Wuzzy/diary/39580 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Standard_tile_layer/Key Maybe we can use this somehow? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf

Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page on wiki

o box, the template that creates the info box is just a convenient place to put this data). Then taginfo gets the data from there and puts them into the list. This is the short-term solution that would allow us to have the same Map Features page we already have, with a hugely reduced (but not totall

Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page on wiki

aginfo should only be the helper here that makes it easier, but it shouldn't decide what ends up on that list and what doesn't. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@opens

Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page on wiki

Hi Matthijs, On Mi, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:33:28 +0200, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > On 1 September 2016 at 15:04, Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org> wrote: > > So, if somebody adds the rendering to the infobox (and tells me about it), > > I'll pull that data from taginfo and can

Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page on wiki

nstreetmap.org/wiki/Geological > > it seems to work well there. > > As there are some problems with the translations of the pages, this > has now been reverted. What are the problems with translations? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page on wiki

well maintained. But looking at it now, it looks quite good, especially for POIs. So, if somebody adds the rendering to the infobox (and tells me about it), I'll pull that data from taginfo and can put it in the taglist tables. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.joche

Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page on wiki

h are currently broken. This is now fixed. Images work again. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page on wiki

On Do, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:21:39 +0200, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > On Thursday, 1 September 2016, Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org> wrote: > > > On Do, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:42:10 +0200, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > > > We have currently a Map Features p

Re: [OSM-talk] Map features page on wiki

every tag list in the wiki and replacing it by the special syntax. The problem ist, as you say, the differing descriptions and such, which need to be consolidated in the process. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 __

Re: [Talk-de] Wie viel Werbung sollte in die Wochennotiz?

sen "wir" die Wochennotiz, weil wir darauf vertrauen, dass ihr das richtige auswählt. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [OSM-talk] Map Features usefulness, usability and maintainability

se to update the descriptions on the individual pages to not loose the possibly better descriptions from the MapFeatures list. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] buildings above the ground and below

address, just put the same address on all buildings if they actually have the same address. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Extract from OSM Planet History dump

o this > extraction for me? http://data.openstreetmapdata.com/ireland-and-northern-ireland.osh.pbf http://data.openstreetmapdata.com/great-britain.osh.pbf Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk maili

Re: [Talk-de] Wann geht eine Bahnstrecke in Betrieb?

erhaupt nicht nach OSM, weil es eine Spezialinformation ist, die sich "on the ground" nicht verifizieren läßt. Aber ich werde mich jetzt auch nicht beschweren, wenn die Eisenbahnmapper dafür einen besonderen Tag erfinden. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.j

Re: [Talk-de] Offene Geodaten in Sachsen - Bitte noch abwarten

inwandfreie Aussage, dass sie damit zufrieden sind auf http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright in der Liste der Contributors genannt zu werden und dass sich darin dann ihr Recht auf Namensnennung erschöpft. Wenn Sie das unterschreiben, dann ist das okay, vorher nicht. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@re

Re: [Talk-de] Download von .osm Daten

h mit osmosis extrahieren? > > Für Eure Hilfe herzlichen Dank. > > Heinz > > > > ___ > Talk-de mailing list > Talk-de@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org h

[Talk-de] Taginfo update

://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ Mehr Details in meinem Blog unter http://blog.jochentopf.com/2015-08-15-hacking-on-taginfo.html Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https

[OSM-talk] Taginfo updates

://blog.jochentopf.com/2015-08-15-hacking-on-taginfo.html Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] name:etymology:wikidata

etymology:wikidata like most of the name:something tags. It is hard enough already to make sense of OSM tags... Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https

Re: [OSM-talk] waterway - routable network and reservoirs/lakes

a dam may have the same name, but have no use as a through route? This is more about the water flow than about being navigable by a ship. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ talk mailing list talk

Re: [Talk-de] Moeglicher Mapnik- oder Tagging-Bug: Blaues Land

gesagt ist das sogar das typische Verhalten. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] mangelhafte Namensnennung auf Mapbox-Karten

systemisches Problem nachweisen können, dann sollte man das gemeinsam mit Mapbox lösen. Aber etwas mehr als zwei Tage später taucht der nächste [...] auf, sollte es halt schon sein. Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688

Re: [OSM-talk] Can wikidata links help fight name inflation?

there are many names for London in different languages, I don't think there are special Russian names for half a million places on Earth. Chances are they are the result of automatic transliteration. And results of automatic processes should not be mapped for obvious reasons. Jochen -- Jochen Topf

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >