On 02.12.2013 01:37, Janko Mihelić wrote:
Nisam previše upoznat sa djelovanjem tih grupa, ali mi se HrOpen više sviđa
čisto zbog šireg kruga djelatnosti kojeg promoviraju. Hulk se bavi Linuxom,
što je samo jedan od operativnih sustava na kojima se mogu gledati naše
karte. Ako se nekome javimo
Pozdrav,
vjerojatno niste ćuli za uMap - alat koji omogućava jednostavnije umetanje OSM
karte na neki websajt pa čak i dodavanje jednostavnih slojeva...
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/
uglavnom, traže pomoć, odnosno lokalizaciju...
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/umap/
Dražen
On 05.12.2013 14:50, hbogner wrote:
Dakle za sad stvari stoje ovako:
HrOpen : 5
HULK : 0
Suzdržan: 1(ja sam inicijator pa čekam vašu odluku)
Molim i ostale da daju svoje mišljenje, mislim da nas ima više od 6.
Pozdrav
dakle HROSGEO (slobodni softver u geoinformatici i slobodni
Dear Kate,
This sounds great! Perhaps a workshop/discussion with the
international volunteers on Sunday?
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I'm excited to meet all of you next weekend.
Would people be interested in discussing next steps
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:23:12AM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
Glenn,
I just used the node that was already in OSM. I'll move it. I've done some
surveys there, so I know where you want it.
So what would be the difference between the place= node and this
admin_centre for admin_level 9? You
On 05-12-13 05:54, Marc Gemis wrote:
Another question related to this boundary. Originally I did not touch
the boundary between Mechelen en Bonheiden. I just reused it for the
Muizen-boundary. I now noticed that the Bonheidensteenweg
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146650425) was partially
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:23:12AM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
Glenn,
I just used the node that was already in OSM. I'll move it. I've done
some
surveys there, so I know where you want it.
So what would be the difference
FYI: SOTM-EU!
Not that far for most of us... :-)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Date: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] SotM-EU 2014 in Karlsruhe, Germany
To: Talk Openstreetmap t...@openstreetmap.org, d...@openstreetmap.org
At least the shapefile is clear about the license, and you can
just open that in josm. You need the OpenData plugin for it.
See:
https://download.agiv.be/Producten/Detail?id=10title=Voorlopig_referentiebestand_gemeentegrenzen
Since the WMS is just a rending of that information, I don't think
When I read the licence file it's the same conditions as the CRAB dataset.
There is an obligation to mention the source, just add it to the list of
sources on the wiki and specify that it's about borders.
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Best regards,
Ben Abelshausen
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:36 PM,
I used the place= node as admin_centre. That's also the one that I moved.
Should there be a difference between the two ?
As for the two relations: I'm still fighting nominatim. I want all the
street(segments) within the Muizen area to return 2812 as post code. In
Germany they use the
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:35:17AM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
I'll try to get the wms layer for the boundaries and adapt the boundary to
the one from AGIV (or are we not allowed to use that ?)
On 2013-12-05 16:36, Kurt Roeckx wrote
:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:19:35PM +0100, Bart Van Lancker wrote:
That's what I'm trying to do in Ghent, and it doesn't work. I've defined the
deelgemeenten with their postal code (actually as a
boundary=administrative), but there seem to be some postal codes hardcoded
in Nominatim, which
On 2013-12-05 03:43, Glenn Plas wrote :
Exactly what I feared, that point in
Muizen has probably never been of any importance, in that sense
the real historic centre of Muizen is the area at the new church
(and old tower) , about 1Km to
Nominatim also uses data that is not in OSM. They did some imports into
their database. That's why there was a postcode 12 in Reet last year. They
removed that one. So it is possible to have postal code nodes that are not
in OSM, and which cannot be deleted in the normal way of course.
as a side
I think the boundary=postal_code makes a difference after all
compare
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=52527679(Waterkluiskaai)
which uses the postal code point
with
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=64725723(Bonheidensteenweg)
which uses the
Of course there are references to 9040. But this what I mean :
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=98380890
There is no such thing for 9040.
Problem is : you can't edit or remove this.
Van: Glenn Plas [mailto:gl...@byte-consult.be]
Verzonden: donderdag 5 december
On 2013-12-05 05:54, Marc Gemis wrote :
Another question related to this boundary.
Originally I did not touch the boundary between Mechelen en
Bonheiden. I just reused it for the Muizen-boundary. I now
noticed that the Bonheidensteenweg
Bart,
I just added a postal_code boundary for 2840 Rumst. And yes, both the
Hondstraat and Steenweg op Waarloos now get the correct postal code: 2840.
They had 2550 (from Kontich) before. So postal_code boundaries are the
solution for my nominatim problems.
regards
m
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at
Did the same (duplicate the admin relation, change into a postal-code
relation) for Bornem and there it works as well. Sas Nattenhaasdonkstraat
now show the correct 2880 postal code. It took several minutes though
before all street segments were updated.
Since in Belgium the postal code areas
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:52:31PM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
Since in Belgium the postal code areas coincide with village borders
I've read somewhere that Brussels has some exceptions to that.
Kurt
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Marc
Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
Bart,
I just added a postal_code boundary for 2840 Rumst. And
yes, both the Hondstraat and Steenweg op Waarloos now get the
correct postal code:
On 05-12-13 22:57, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:52:31PM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
Since in Belgium the postal code areas coincide with village borders
I've read somewhere that Brussels has some exceptions to that.
Rest assured, things like VRT and NATO own their own postal
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
On 05-12-13 22:57, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:52:31PM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
Since in Belgium the postal code areas coincide with village borders
I've read somewhere that Brussels has some
André, your example is the postal code of the centre of a village. I'm
talking about streets, especially streets at the border of the postal code
area, close to the postal code node of the next village.
The Germans have those postal code area's. it's also mentioned on the
Nominatim FAQ page [1].
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Bart Van Lancker b...@vlweb.net wrote:
Okay, thanks. But there’s one more problem.
Both the deelgemeenten Ledeberg and Gentbrugge have the postal code 9050.
The same counts for Afsnee and Sint-Denijs Westrem. So, should I draw a new
boundary over the
Generally they’re not offices but mailboxes in post offices that are the
problem. They get tagged, but if you go there, all that’s there is a private
post office.
From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 7:39 AM
To: Ed Loach
Cc: osm
2013/12/5 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
Generally they’re not offices but mailboxes in post offices that are the
problem. They get tagged, but if you go there, all that’s there is a
private post office.
because you checked this personally? How would you know that these are
mailboxes and not
As a result of some miss communication my job today was cut short, so I'm back
home early ... this is a summary of my thoughts while driving home.
The trip home was fun due to a lack of the right data. Had I know that the A429
was closed I would have taken a different decision early on, but
As a result of some miss communication I stopped reading the email
before the wall of text ended.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2013/12/5 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
I would like to request that 'start_date' is automatically populated with
ad the very least, the current date, but with an option to update it based
on what is being traced from?
if you are refering to the tag start_date than I strongly oppose this
Hi,
today I have the pleasure to announce that we'll be holding SotM-EU
2014 in Karlsruhe, on 13-15 June. We've set up the web page at
www.sotm-eu.org and we'll be posting news there and on @sotmeu on Twitter.
We'll be trying to emulate the success of the 2011 Vienna conference,
bringing
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I would like to request that 'start_date' is automatically populated with ad
the very least, the current date, but with an option to update it based on
what is being traced from?
if you are refering to the tag start_date than I strongly oppose this idea.
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:20:58 +
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I would like to request that 'start_date' is automatically
populated with ad the very least, the current date, but with an
option to update it based on what is being traced from?
if
Andy Street wrote:
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:20:58 +
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I would like to request that 'start_date' is automatically
populated with ad the very least, the current date, but with an
option to update it based on what is being
2013/12/5 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
You are perfectly correct that there are more start_dates needed,
If you have one object for the pub and one for the house you don't have
this problem. A building ideally wouldn't have tags like amenity=pub, but
of course it does currently in the osm
Yes, I have checked a number of them. I can sometimes find the website of the
private post office with their mailboxes, sometimes I can find sites listing
100 businesses at the same address when location is clearly a small location
within a strip mall.
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
A simple example starting with my own house - how should residential
buildings be tagged?
The block they sit on is more of a land use concern, but the specific
buildings don't occupy the entire block - and seem like they should be
tagged house.
Is this a correct way to go about things? The goal
From: Will Rouesnel [mailto:w.roues...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:34 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] Adding residential properties?
A simple example starting with my own house - how should residential
buildings be tagged?
The block they sit on is
Hi again,
There has been a response from TMR and the necessary permission has been
obtained (for their datasets
accessiblehttps://data.qld.gov.au/organizationon the
data.qld.gov.au portal). I have an administrative query to be cleared by
TMR before I make any amendments to the Wiki.
Its a start
I started out with buildings, but got a bit excited in my local area;
getting down into trees, power lines, fences, driveways etc.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-34.84928/138.52277
Not super pretty looking.
Nowdays, I tend to map the primary houses only, and perhaps significant
features
I'd suggest you read these wiki pages:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Address
My personal opinion is that the address should be on a separate node at
the entrance to the property. This is preferred for disability access
programs.
It also
Hi folks,
I'm at a bit of a loss right now and wonder if any of you have experienced
the same issue.
For about a week on 2 different machines I have only had access to zoom
level 19.
I've pretty much run down every google result possible (remove tile cache,
remove attribution file et al) and
Hi Will,
I’ve been mapping the building outlines and tagging the feature appropriately,
e.g. house and then adding address data to each building. I’ve also added in a
smaller area the boundary fences or walls. There is I understand, two competing
models for recording addresses, one where the
Hi Jason,
There seems to be two layers in Bing in South Australia. A high resolution
three or four year old layer and a lower resolution layer only about twelve
months old. This may be related to what you are seeing.
On 6 Dec 2013, at 9:29 am, Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com wrote:
For
Hi Alex,
The age is an interesting point but not what I am experiencing I think. As
an example, and to your point, I accept that the Higher Resolution imagery
is older than the lower resolution imagery. My house roof solar panels
installed in June 2011 are there in the Low res images. When I
Jason Ward wrote:
Extra / New Info. The OSM iD (in-browser) editor is also not showing
the Bing Hi res images (so its not just me!) Something has happened
recently. I'd be interested to here from other BNE mappers because I
am confuzzled.
Not just Australia either - someone on IRC
Ah. Okay. I'll jump on a few more IRC channels and keep an eye out then.
Thanks Andy.
Cheers,
Jason
On 6 December 2013 10:50, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Jason Ward wrote:
Extra / New Info. The OSM iD (in-browser) editor is also not showing the
Bing Hi res images
Its a bit of a stretch but they could be scaling back high load services
(ie. High Res map tiles) to non Bing products to ensure their 3D Maps
release runs buttering smooth.
http://www.bing.com/blogs/site_blogs/b/search/archive/2013/12/05/maps3d.aspx
but
in this day and age that'd be an
Willie, sabe se já há um shapefile baseado nessa atualização?
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Hallo,
2013/12/5 Masi Master masi-mas...@gmx.de:
[...] Der
Schutzsteifen ist allerdings eine Radspur (nicht verpflichtend und auch
nicht ganz exklusiv), die nur im Bedarfsfall von KFZ befahren/benutzt werden
darf, und auch nur wenn kein Radfahrer behindert wird.
behindert - gefährdet [1]
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 12:05:55AM +0100, Garry wrote:
Eine 6spurige Autobahn nebst Böschung, Entwässerungsgräben,
Sicherheitszonen etc.
kann man nicht mehr einfach ignorieren und den umgebenden landuse zuordnen.
Allerdings würde ich für landuse=road plädieren und die eigentliche
befestigte
Am 05.12.2013 10:15, schrieb Florian Lohoff:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 12:05:55AM +0100, Garry wrote:
Eine 6spurige Autobahn nebst Böschung, Entwässerungsgräben,
Sicherheitszonen etc.
kann man nicht mehr einfach ignorieren und den umgebenden landuse zuordnen.
Allerdings würde ich für
Am 05.12.2013 00:05, schrieb Garry:
Eine 6spurige Autobahn nebst Böschung, Entwässerungsgräben,
Sicherheitszonen etc.
kann man nicht mehr einfach ignorieren und den umgebenden landuse zuordnen.
Bisher war die sinnvollste Regelung, dass man keinen landuse nutzt und
die Fläche ungetagt lässt.
Am 4. Dezember 2013 22:36 schrieb Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de:
Das ist aber etwas was man nicht on the ground nachvollziehen kann
wo das Grundstück aufhört.
und das aus dem Land der Jägerzäune? Man kann sehr oft nachvollziehen, wo
das Grundstück aufhört, nur aus einer Begehung der Gegend und
Hallo,
ich habe heute das besondere Vergnuegen, die SotM-EU 2014 in
Karlsruhe (13.-15.6.) anzukuendigen. Die Webseite auf www.sotm-eu.org
ist schon aktualisiert, und alle Neuigkeiten gibt es dort sowie auch
unter @sotmeu auf Twitter.
Ich hoffe, es gelingt uns, an den grossen Erfolg der ersten
Ich hatte bis vor kurzem noch die Möglichkeit das beim Verschieben der
Karte diese automatisch aktualisiert wurde, brauchte also nicht mehr per
Hmd den OSM Server anzusprechen, auch BING wurde nachgeladen.
DIe Tage ist mal JOSM tatal abgestürzt, seitdem geht das nicht mehr.
Kann mir bitte mal
Hi,
On 12/05/2013 08:21 AM, gmbo wrote:
Ich habe heute morgen festgestellt dass die Elternrelation Stolpersteine
gelöscht wurde.
Warum ist das gemacht worden?
Ich hab zwar nicht vor, das zu machen, aber es gaebe eine Menge Gruende
dafuer - wurde ja hier schon lang und breit diskutiert.
Am 05.12.2013 16:04, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hi,
On 12/05/2013 08:21 AM, gmbo wrote:
Ich habe heute morgen festgestellt dass die Elternrelation Stolpersteine
gelöscht wurde.
Warum ist das gemacht worden?
Ich hab zwar nicht vor, das zu machen, aber es gaebe eine Menge Gruende
dafuer - wurde ja
Hallo Gisbert,
ich glaube, du missverstehst die normale API und den Vergleich zur
Overpass-API.
Beide sind prinzipiell optimiert für die Abfrage nach Geometrie, also
von zusammenhängenden Boundingboxen.
Beide können auch Objekte nach Typ+ID (Typ im Sinne von node, way,
relation) zurückliefern.
Hallo,
Am 05.12.2013 16:31, schrieb gmbo:
Am 05.12.2013 16:04, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hi,
On 12/05/2013 08:21 AM, gmbo wrote:
Ich habe heute morgen festgestellt dass die Elternrelation
Stolpersteine
gelöscht wurde.
Warum ist das gemacht worden?
Ich hab zwar nicht vor, das zu machen, aber
Am 5. Dezember 2013 18:23 schrieb Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de
:
(wohlgemerkt: per API
musst Du dazu die Relation selbst UND die member runterladen, bei
overpass nur die eine Abfrage ausführen).
ja, eines der Hauptprobleme der Relation (neben der Tatsache, dass sie dem
Hallo zusammen,
persönlich würde ich zum Editieren in JOSM empfehlen, eine Hintergrundkarte,
z.B. die OSM-Karte einzuschalten und dann mit dem mirrored_download-Plugin
unter dem Menüpunkt Datei Mittels Overpass-API laden im Dialogfenster
[timeout:180];node[memorial:type=stolperstein];out
Hallo,
Außerdem dachte ich bisher bei 4 Knoten, die
gemeinsamen Daten wie Künstler, übergeordnete Website wäre vorteilhafter
in der Relation.
Nein. Mindestens die Main API, komprimiertes XML, PBF und auch die OVerpass
API ersetzen Strings intern durch Referenzen auf Strings, d.h. sie
Am 05.12.2013, 09:34 Uhr, schrieb pmsg pmsg2...@yahoo.com:
Hallo,
2013/12/5 Masi Master masi-mas...@gmx.de:
[...] Der
Schutzsteifen ist allerdings eine Radspur (nicht verpflichtend und auch
nicht ganz exklusiv), die nur im Bedarfsfall von KFZ befahren/benutzt
werden
darf, und auch nur
Sounds fun, wish I could be there
Mikel
___
Talk-in mailing list
Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
Too bad I wouldn't be able to attend it. Mumbai is too far away from home
and this was announced in too short a notice.
I've always wanted to attend one of these workshops since I started
contributing to OSM. Maybe next time.
Regards,
Aditya Nag.
On 05-Dec-2013 7:55 PM, Arun Ganesh
2013/11/18 Simone F. grop...@gmail.com:
Ciao.
Ciao Simone
Aggiorno le pagine solo di tanto in tanto (per es. adesso...), sarei
contento se qualcuno volesse farlo regolarmente.
se volete il server è sempre a disposizione
Il link al codice è sulla pagina, dentro Info, se serve posso
Cioè dici di mettere un name= Via Lato dx - Via Lato sx a me non sembra il
massimo e non trovo indicazioni sul wiki, forse va corretto?
Da: beppebo...@libero.it beppebo...@libero.it
A: talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Inviato: Mercoledì 4 Dicembre 2013 18:06
Oggetto:
Beh, se li ha copiati da Gmap dio ci aiuti, in quanto spesso sono errati,
almeno nella mia zona è così. Non so adesso ma una volta per correggerli
passava anche un anno. Mi è capitato per la mia via, che infatti i corrieri
non trovavano mai.
Ecco perchè ho deciso di collaborare ad OSM, e ancor di
Non basta mettere bicycle=no? Anche se poi voglio vedere dove sia
applicabile.
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/voting-bicycle-use-cycleway-tp5788528p5788604.html
Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
bredy wrote
Nel caso come questo
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1703373539
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1703373539
come dovrei mappare l'incrocio semaforico? Naturalmente c'è un solo
semaforo ma se metto i due rami o li faccio incontrare sullo stesso punto,
ma graficamente non è
Ci ho guardato, ma non ho risposta buona.
Io in questi casi ho inserito gli incroci con geometria corretta e con un
semaforo su ogni incrocio (nel tua esempio ce ne sarebbero 2). Ma non è
soddisfacente.
Ci dovrebbe essere un metodo migliore (relazione) per raggruppare tutti gli
elementi che
Stavo leggendo nella lista tagging la discussione sul tag in oggetto e mi son
reso conto che forse sto sbagliando ad inserirlo, nel senso che io lo metto
sulle way senza uscita, ad esempio dove trovo il cartello. Ma da quel che ho
capito non serve a questo, ma dove c'è una strada vicina per far
Qualcuno sa come è la situazione legale in Italia? Suppongo anche qua
esiste un obbligo di utilizzare una pista/corsia ciclabile quando c'è.
Volker
2013/12/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
C'è una votazione in giro che potrebbe interessare i ciclisti:
Io per incroci complessi ho adottato la convenzione descritta qui
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Traffic_light#Tag_all_incoming_ways
ad esempio:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/45.44352/10.97014
e
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/45.44088/10.96643
poi ... non so se i motori di
Buongiorno,
per mappare delle zone di verde (landuse=grass) in una piazza
(highway=pedestrian, area=yes), ho creato un poligono contenente un altro
al suo interno. Non so come fare la differenza tra quello di area maggiore
(rappresentante la piazza) e quello di area minore (la zona di verde). Come
PS Non sono stato preciso colla domanda:
http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/site.php?p=normativao=vdid=1id_dett=185
L'articolo 182 (9) fa riferimento a un regolamento che non ho trovato da
nessuna parte. Allora ci sono o non ci sono esenzioni all'obbligo di uso?
2013/12/5 Volker Schmidt
Il giorno 05 dicembre 2013 11:45, Francesco Frassinelli
frap...@gmail.comha scritto:
Buongiorno,
per mappare delle zone di verde (landuse=grass) in una piazza
(highway=pedestrian, area=yes), ho creato un poligono contenente un altro
al suo interno. Non so come fare la differenza tra quello di
2013/12/5 bredy bredy...@yahoo.it
Non basta mettere bicycle=no? Anche se poi voglio vedere dove sia
applicabile.
no, perché è sbagliato (non è un generale bicycle=no, ma risulta come
bicycle=no in certi condizioni).
ciao,
Martin
___
Talk-it
2013/12/5 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com
per far prima (forse c'è bisogno del plugin utilsplugin2) seleziona la
piazza e le aiuole e premi ctrl-alt-a (vedo che usi josm, quindi perchè non
saltare parte del lavoro :) )
si,
dopo l'operazione il way outer (piazza) non dovrebbe più contenere tags
Come va mappato questo posto?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2024626650
E' un comprensorio di 4 palazzoni vicino a delle piste da sci, in
montagna, usati per lo più d'inverno.
Attualmente è mappato come village, ma non è chiaramente un vero paese
e, poi, è molto piccolo. Paradossalmente,
2013/12/5 bredy bredy...@yahoo.it
Stavo leggendo nella lista tagging la discussione sul tag in oggetto e mi
son
reso conto che forse sto sbagliando ad inserirlo, nel senso che io lo metto
sulle way senza uscita, ad esempio dove trovo il cartello. Ma da quel che
ho
capito non serve a questo,
Il giorno 05 dicembre 2013 12:01, sabas88 saba...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Il giorno 05 dicembre 2013 11:45, Francesco Frassinelli frap...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
Buongiorno,
per mappare delle zone di verde (landuse=grass) in una piazza
(highway=pedestrian, area=yes), ho creato un poligono
Il giorno 05 dicembre 2013 12:10, solitone solit...@mail.com ha scritto:
Come va mappato questo posto?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2024626650
E' un comprensorio di 4 palazzoni vicino a delle piste da sci, in
montagna, usati per lo più d'inverno.
Attualmente è mappato come village,
E' una località a circa 15 km da casa mia, mezz'oretta di auto. Ho
effettuato una sola mappatura in questa zona quest'estate, ho tracciato
un sentiero di montagna e risistemato alcuni monti.
Non mi sono occupato delle attribuzioni geografiche del luogo.
La località fa parte del comune di
2013/12/5 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com
Metterei place=locality (meno di 100 abitanti fissi)...
-1, se hanno abitanti fissi non può essere un locality, metterei hamlet.
ciao,
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Se ti consola non sei l'unico perché anch'io l'ho sempre usato a intuito senza
controllare il wiki.
Nei prossimi giorni avrò un pó di correzioni da fare...
Ciao
-- Inviato da Android con K-9 Mail.
bredy bredy...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
Stavo leggendo nella lista tagging la discussione sul tag in
Gianluca Boero ha scritto:
[Rucas] fa parte del comune di
Bagnolo Piemonte. Neppure Montoso comunque un paese ma una
frazione o localit del comune di Bagnolo Piemonte, provincia di
CN. A mio avviso andrebbero mappate entrambe allo stesso
Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto:
2013/12/5 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com
Metterei place=locality (meno di 100 abitanti fissi)...
-1, se hanno abitanti fissi non pu
è con grande piacere che vi annuncio State of the Map Europe.
che avrà luogo nella splendida Karlsruhe dal 13 al 15 giugno 2014.
a breve uscirà la call for papers
-Simone.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Date: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM
si, per la seconda volta in questa proposta ;-)
ciao,
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Italia: e c’è pista ciclabile il ciclista è tenuto a utilizzarla.
Mi risulta che siano esclusi i ciclisti – agonisti in allenamento.
Ciao Beppe
Da: Volker Schmidt [mailto:vosc...@gmail.com]
Inviato: giovedì 5 dicembre 2013 11:44
A: openstreetmap list - italiano
Oggetto: Re: [Talk-it]
Italia: e c’è pista ciclabile il ciclista è tenuto a utilizzarla.
ASi, ma manca (o non trovo in internet) il regolamento citato nel paragrafo
Mi risulta che siano esclusi i ciclisti – agonisti in allenamento.
Non ho trovato traccia di questo neanche.
Se qualcuno possiede informazioni più
Am 05/dic/2013 um 10:38 schrieb bredy bredy...@yahoo.it:
Peccato che ci sia
ancora solo GARMIN a supportare le OSM.
non è così, non ci supportano per niente, siamo noi (o meglio il progetto
mkgmap) a supportare il formato proprietario della Garmin.
;-)
ciao,
Martin
Qui le sanzioni per il mancato uso della ciclabile:
http://www.codicedellastrada.net/index.html?obbligo_di_uso_della_pista_cic.htm
--
Qui l’articolo di legge (art 182 comma9) che cita:
-Original Message-
From: dvdzero [mailto:dvdz...@gmail.com]
Sent: giovedì 5 dicembre 2013 11:46
To: talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-it] Semaforo in caso particolare
Io per incroci complessi ho adottato la convenzione descritta qui
Il 05/12/2013 14:48, solitone ha scritto:
Direi, quindi, che sia Rucas sia Montoso vadano mappati come hamlet.
Mi sembra di vedere che tutte le frazioni di Bagnolo Piemonte sono
degli hamlet, a parte Rucas che è un village, come Bagnolo!
Su locality la penso come Martin: non andrebbe usato
2013/12/5 solitone solit...@mail.com
-1, se hanno abitanti fissi non può essere un locality, metterei
hamlet.
Cosa intendi per fissi? Residenti?
Abitanti residenti probabilmente non ne ha, mentre ne ha diversi durante
la stagione turistica.
si, in qualche modo residenti, un turista
Gianluca Boero ha scritto:
Come mai questo tuo interesse per Rucas? :-)
Stavo guardando come arrivare, vorrei portare il mio pargolo a fare
qualche slittata sulla neve, e ho notato che Rucas era renderizzato come
un paese delle dimensioni di Bagnolo e, allora, sono andato a vedere che
place era
1 - 100 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
