luchtfietserij :-)
Groet,
Richard Duivenvoorde
On 5/18/23 11:51, Hugo hölscher wrote:
Dag allemaal,
Bij het taggen van laadpalen die "los" op straat staan(voor elektrische auto's)
loop ik tegen de naamgeving aan. Ik gebruik nu als name: de code die op de paal staat: bv
cch0012334.
ere in OSM is absolutely a valid and interesting
topic, but the lists belong to pretty much the same period in OSM history as
IRC and Potlatch, and I say that as someone who still uses both. :)
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
ht
le.travel.
Unfortunately one of the hosts I use let me down (repeated outages and very
little support), so I had to move a bunch of stuff at short notice on New
Year's Eve. I haven't had chance to move a few of the tile layers yet but
should be able to in the next few days.
cheer
Bonjour Ludovic,
C'est documenté dans le wiki dans le chapitre "Poste de transformation locaux"
de cette page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France#Postes_de_transformation_locaux
La photo ressemble beaucoup au modèle "RS - Rural Poste Socle" en fin de
tableau.
Florent
e outlier.
And I've never even heard of "def:*" tags.)
Richard
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
been added. They mostly seem to have been mapped by TheOldMiner
who hasn't been active for four years.
Any rail enthusiasts or Queenslanders on this list who fancy cleaning them up?
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Thanks for the replies. It confirms that my original approach was
correct and that the other mapper's changes were a bit misguided.
I guess I need to get in touch with him to change things back.
Richard
-- Original Message --
From: "Andrew Harvey"
To: "Richard
e used to imply a
perceived hierarchy in the footway network, in spite of their physical
appearance on the ground? Can it be justified for the purpose of
improving route-finding on the ground? Thanks for any discussion.
And apologies for the lengthy post!
Thanks,
Richard
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
in the UK.
By all means namespace it (royal_mail:addr:city) or use a bespoke tag for what
is a bespoke concept (addr:post_town). But let’s not remove useful information
(the actual town/city) in favour of it, and let’s not tag as if post towns are
an intrinsic part of UK addresses, becau
talling a stile or gate can only be done with the consent of the
highway authority (same act).
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ul. I mean, just change it back and
say "put back pending survey" if you feel that strongly, it doesn't need an
entire mailing list thread.
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
gs.
It might therefore be incumbent on us all to shut up and let women be heard.
Their experiences do not need to be mediated through our mansplaining.
In that spirit I'll post no more on this.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://
operator=British Waterways tags according to taginfo, so
it could be polished off pretty quickly with an Overpass query and a manual
edit.
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
g, Here, Tencent,
ViaMichelin, TomTom, Mapquest, Esri, and Qwant all have on-map attribution.
http://www.systemed.net/osm/attribution.png
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Chesapeake Bay with the series of letters
"c","o","a","s","t","l","i","n" and "e".
Richard
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Bonjour,
Mais en regardant ce soir j'ai trouvé que la concentration de supports radio
fantomes autour des stades est assez bizarre :
J'en ai vu beaucoup autours de stades. Ils sont sur les mâts d'éclairage et du
coup doivent financer les clubs, à moins que ce ne soit les mairies
(propriétaires
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:02:13AM +0100, Robert Grübler wrote:
> Am 11. November 2020 20:02 schrieb Richard:
>
> > das Problem sind die Nichtwanderkarten die niemals vorhatten
> > sac_scale, via_ferrata_scale, uiaa uvm auszuwerten,
> > wie soll das jemals funkti
en "Nichtwanderkarten" eigentlich überhaupt keine
path auswerten um auf der sicheren Seite zu sein.
Richard
___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 01:56:56AM +0100, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
> On 30.10.20 23:44, Richard wrote:
> >>Tatsache ist, dass jede Versicherung einen Steig einfacher und
> >>ungefährlicher macht, und dass es von einem Steig mit einem einzigen
> >>Trittstift b
trying to either 1) recover a BBB account or 2) setup a new one,
there seems to be an email outage.
can someone reach out to the admins for the OSM BBB server to get
the problem resolved?
thanks,
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStree
ht wenn manch einer Couchmapper
ferratas im Ausland umändert.
MfG
Richard
___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
restrictions. It's not fully featured but might be enough. It
could be given a Lua binding, I guess, to avoid duplication.
Richard
___
OSRM-talk mailing list
OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
i'm personally wary of "no objection"; it's not really an explicit
grant and there is no certainty about whether an objection might
arise later. i would say that probably there were no lawyers involved
in phrasing that statement.
richard
On 10/9/20 2:05 PM, lobstereat...@airmail.cc w
ether with a liberal
sprinkling of unsourced assertions, but no actual evidence that any router has
ever sent anyone round one of these roundabout flares.
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ptions. and in Alaska and Hawaii, the
roads have to be examined on a case by case basis. congress choose to
give those two states latitude so they could get funds from the program
even though they were unlikely to actually build real "motorways".
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill
is an
Urban Freeway.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java - Web Applications - Search
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
are automatically superior, because XML
has namespaces and therefore we must too.
Changing the tags will achieve nothing; will mean that data consumers have to
support two schemes instead of one; and will needlessly break stuff.
On the positive side, great to see all these USBRs
R67
relation, though with the expectation that the latter may need to be
retagged if/when the Regional Route number is lost.
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
answer is probably to maintain two separate relations,
which is a bit of a maintenance faff but at least understandable.
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
experienced (by definition the beginner users use iD
these days) - many of them have a four-figure number of
changesets - so installing AIR shouldn't be beyond them.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
type but doesn't actually mean anything until you identify what those uses are,
and crucially, find someone who is prepared to do them.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
thub.com/ruffle-rs/ruffle) and is under very active
development, but does not yet support AS3 or the Flash Player features that P2
needs. I would anticipate that P2 will be able to run as WebAssembly when
Ruffle reaches feature parity with AIR 2.6.
Richard
_
the NCN but remains as a EuroVelo route.
cheers
Richard
[writing in a personal capacity only etc. etc.]
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
r
change in tagging there is. But bear in mind that no-one apart from me and
CycleStreets takes this much interest in tagging subtleties, so you've just
broken routing for Strava and Komoot and Mapbox and whatever. Actually, wait,
you should totally do that.
cheers
Richard
___
tors) to get to the equivalent.
That's proportionate. It's not what we are talking about here. We are
talking about maps where 90%+ of the data comes from OSM, yet a credit to
OSM is either missing entirely or deliberately obscured. Please let's not
try to derail the issue of OSM-based maps missi
eisten Straßen linear eingezeichnet sind - also nicht als
Fläche hilft
die Analyse der Geometrie auch nur begrenzt.. und andernfalls wäre die Analyse
vermutlich
aus Gründen der Komplexität nicht durchführbar.
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
be useful for people (not really being a JOSMite myself ;) ).
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
es on the way (and indeed that’s done
in lots of other places). cycle.travel gives a small uplift to ways tagged with
that.
Richard
cycle.travel
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 25 Apr 2020, 09:53 +0100, Andrew Harvey , wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 18:49, Richard Fairhurst
> > wrote:
> > > Relations with type=route are for routes, with a defined start and end.
> > > Not
> > > for networks. If you want to
t and end. Not
for networks. If you want to put them all in a single relation, then do it
with type=network or something:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:network
cheers
Richard
cycle.travel
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Australia-f541
map has many contributors - and,
implicitly, you could be one too. So it serves as a recruiting sergeant for
OSM, while conveying the democratic, grassroots nature of the project. To my
mind the main driver for attribution has always been to get more
contributors and make the map better.
I'm past ca
oren (hoewel ik begrijp dat hoewel
er staat 'source:BAG' men toch (straatnaam) aanpassingen maakt?)
In deze tijd waarin ook de overheid steeds meer into 'linked'-data is,
wordt het natuurlijk interessant om zelf ook 'linkable' te zijn?
Wordt het WFS-script nog wel eens gerund? En zou het dan m
nvía a
https://www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/ccayes/alertasActual/nCov-China/home.htm
Best regards / Cordialement / Un saludo / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kenavo,
Jean-Baptiste Richard
--
Sent from mobile. Please excuse my brevity, and typos if any.
Original Message
From: J
-spelling' ofzo?
Iemand hier een idee over. Of kan iemand me wijzen waar hier eerder over
gesproken is?
Vriendelijke Groet,
Richard Duivenvoorde
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Hola,
PD: sólo aclarar que a pesar del plazo de dos días, si alguien quiere opinar
(bienvenido está), cuanto antes mejor, de cara a reconsiderar planes según haga
falta.
S2
Best regards / Cordialement / Un saludo / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kenavo,
Jean-Baptiste Richard
--
Sent from mobile
/ Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kenavo,
Jean-Baptiste Richard
--
Sent from mobile. Please excuse my brevity, and typos if any.
Original Message
From: "in...@jeanbaptisterichard.eu"
Sent: 13 April 2020 01:43:40 CEST
To: "Discusión en Español de OpenStreetMap"
Martin Lucas-Smith - CycleStreets wrote:
> Richard will be doing the bulk of the scripting work, and is working
> on converting each of the sections of data. This will naturally be
> published on Github openly, as will the outputted data. This is
> reasonably complex work give
hicle=yes which was
inaccurate. In this particular case I was lucky to find an openly licensed
photo to demonstrate the real access rights on that way.
If you're exclusively mapping new housing estates in urban areas, though, go
for it. :)
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.co
Bonjour,
Merci pour cet outil.
En Loire-Atlantique, il ressort un bon nombre de voies "blanches" (pas de nom
ou seulement des espaces?).
https://dev.cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/fantoir/top_adresses_manquantes.html#dept=44
Pour certains de ces cas, il y a deux fois la même ref Fantoir: une fois
n it if (a) you are happy with its
current functionality or (b) you are prepared to maintain it (or a fork)
yourself.
Richard
___
OSRM-talk mailing list
OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Florimond Berthoux a écrit:
> Sinon la façon que je recommande de faire c’est le cas S5
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Miscellaneous
> highway=path
> segregated=yes|no
> foot=designated
> bicycle=designated
et aussi:
surface=asphalt|gravel|...
Richard
--
Sen
Kathleen Lu wrote:
> I would not say this is true. Google maps has routing for walking,
> cycling, and public transit, and their public transit information is
> probably more complete than OSM's.
It is, but on the other hand Google's walking and cycling routing is _much_
worse.
enu after December this year when Flash Player support is
no longer available in browsers, although it will probably continue to be
available as an executable app via Adobe/Harman AIR.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discus
Rory McCann wrote:
> The existence of an OSM cycling logo doesn't mean all
> OSMers have to be cycling activists!
Wait, what?
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
___
talk mailing lis
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 04:01:23PM -0500, Mario Frasca wrote:
> On 15/02/2020 15:27, Richard wrote:
> >getting better and better: we have now a discussion on the labeling
> >of Antifa, definition of facism, authority of Wikipedia, what next?
> >
> >* less politics is
definition of facism, authority of Wikipedia, what next?
* less politics is better for OSM
* I would not be happy if anyone could mashup his logo with that of OSM
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
]), Jo and Schuyler's freemap.in
(2005?), and OpenStreetMap itself (2004).
We all converged on OSM sooner or later, but it's a worthwhile historical
detail to remember the early days.
Richard
[1] http://www.systemed.net/blog/legacy/entry071107122332.html
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabb
tagging, but that's just a result of OSM
changing - there's no need for any rancour against the original mappers.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https:
a major selling point can focus on out of district response; often
FDs know their own area well, but when they go to support other
companies they often don't know a whole lot about the place they're
responding to.
richard
On 2/3/20 6:59 PM, Mike N wrote:
> Mike,
> It is a rather uniq
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 10:58:01PM +, Alan Mackie wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts ?
thanks, for some reason it was not easy to find.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
ht
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 04:19:32PM +0100, Rory McCann wrote:
Hi,
> A new Telegram group has been set up: “RainbOSM”. A chat about LGBTQIA*
> issues and OpenStreetMap.
>
> Join here: https://t.me/joinchat/BDLI7xMzuF5TRZ5lwLYxkA
is there a list of OSM groups in Telegram somewhe
épartement de la Loire-Atlantique à cette occasion.
Il y a des chances pour que très peu de sources autres qu'OSM et Wikipédia
soient à jour sur ce cas. On voit régulièrement que les frontières de la
Loire-Atlantique ne sont pas mise à jour dans beaucoup de cartes.
Cordialement,
Flore
igitising
others. But certainly they haven't done the full set of PROWs yet.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
IDs in process_node, you could assign crossing penalties that way.
Richard
___
OSRM-talk mailing list
OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
to decide what roads you're putting in what category,
but hey, this is OSM.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
... the majority of bike routes in the UK aren't
ordered. If someone desperately wants it to be ordered they can fix it
themselves afterwards. It's more important that the route is unambiguous,
i.e. the member ways all join to form a single route without unnecessary
branches and loops.
cheers
Richard
lunteers and partly served by donated hardware; turning
that into an, at least partially, paid-for service would probably
necessitate rethinking the sysadmin and hardware situation from the ground
up.)
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/G
s?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aseasonal
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/France-f5380434.html
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
This is getting ridiculous.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Australia-f5416966.html
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
-lady's daily rounds (or I
could ask her, but I'm not sure of the IP of asking an RM employee...). If
you dump them into the database as-is I almost certainly won't get round to
it.
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
nobbery [3], but there’s not a lot of point fretting
over how pretty the tagging is on the route relation if the route is actually
wrong in the first place.
Could I encourage people to check the EuroVelo routes in their home countries
and update them where necessary?
Richard
Bonjour,
Pour ce cas, je suggère d'utiliser landuse=school.
Dans le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dschool,
landuse=school est utilisé pour grouper 2 écoles (donc 2 ref:UAI différentes)
d'un même "groupe scolaire", donc pourquoi pas l'utiliser pour les sous-parties.
taining qualified people to work on this". The choice of
technology/platform for such a project would be down to those people and
what they find comfortable.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
_
ontinue doing what the wiki does. Same principle as switch2osm.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
your new tag, etc. etc.). Life is too short to explain this
to everyone and, to be honest, the uber-keen tag proposer doesn't want to
hear their proposal rubbished in the first five minutes so won't listen
anyway. Writing down "this is how OSM tags work" would solve a lot of this
heartache
Hi,
noticed that many wiki pages like
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:structure
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bridge:structure
are now full of red links instead of the images that were previously there.
What happened??
Richard
eers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
permission for attribution via our central
'Contributors' pages needs to be obtained and documented."
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
hese in your statement.
For better understanding, you claimed "this looks pretty much like
being written by corporate representatives", and I pointed out that one
of the items in point 2 that you object to was written by me in 2012,
so not a corporate representative, and has been at osm
acceptable. That's unambiguous all we
need. Fussing about what other logos might be on the map is a diversion
and is not supported by the ODbL.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ks pretty much
> like being written by corporate representatives
Your point 2 is objecting to something I wrote in 2012 when I was editing a
magazine about inland waterways and has been on osm.org/copyright ever
since, so nope. :)
Richard
[1] let's be honest, we're mostly talking about Mapbox an
se the attribution as long as
it is initially fully visible"
This would be better as "It is permissible to provide a user-activated
mechanism to...". There are apps which flash up an OSM credit for under a
second, after which it disappears (including one terrific iOS mapping app
wh
://www.openstreetmap.fr/contribuer/.
Cordialement,
Florent RICHARD
De : cont...@tourisme-marseille.com
Envoyé : mardi 6 août 2019 13:36
À : Florent Richard
Objet : Re: Tourisme Marseille // Carte Interactive & Blog de découverte de
Marseille "Carte OpenStreetMap"
Me
Bonjour,
J'avais également posté un message sur la page de contact du site.
J'ai reçu la même réponse ce matin.
La personne est visiblement de bonne foi, mais n'a juste pas trouvé comment
faire.
Je l'ai orienté vers un tuto indiquant comment utiliser openstreetmap dans
wordpress
or trunk, we should follow suit and tag
something like highway=tertiary, designation=primary, ref=A***.
cheers
Richard
[1] https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/forum/
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB m
den lokalen Bedingungen zu fragen.
So gut wie möglich korrekt mappen - und bitte keine Klettersteige/routen als
highway=path
eintragen *nur* damit sie in Mapnik gerendert werden.
Die Apps-programmierer sollten sich auch Gedanken über sac_scale machen..
Richard
___
g/#route?id=2815833 - and created
relations for some of the longer routes. But really it needs all the routes
to be broken out into individual relations and given a common cycle_network
tag.
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
local trails that also form
part of a longer route - e.g. parts of the Bay Trail, or the East Coast
Greenway. It would be good to have a distinct C Canal Trail relation over
and above the USBRS 50 relation, for example.
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.
some code, but would appreciate a few
general pointers.
cheers
Richard
___
OSRM-talk mailing list
OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
information from RTC's website or similar.
Most trails have their own websites: factual statements on those sites
can almost certainly be used as fair use.)
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
but I'll optimise it
later.)
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
new york is in the proces of (finally) converting exit numbers to match
mileages.
OSMers traveling in NY can help out by paying attention and updating
when they see it. changes on I-84 are reportedly happening now.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consul
l sichtbar zu machen).
Wenn Du so etwas spezielles in der Karte angezeigt haben möchtest finden sich
meistens
auch Möglichkeiten.. einfach hier fragen.
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Andrew Hain wrote:
> Have a new team of developers code from the codebase of iD.
> Write a new online editor from scratch.
> Abandon online editing and tell everyone to use an offline editor.
Please stop trolling.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-D
l and you can't do multimodal routing if you can't navigate the
platforms. Graphhopper does.
I could list about 20 editor tagging improvements that would make foot and
bike routing better, and this isn't one of them.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f517
whichever off-way entity seems most appropriate to the relation and let the
data user figure it out.
Richard
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
t time to admit the total failure of this search and inplement
it via google or other ones.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
tab: JOSM arguably has more "heft" because its bulk
editing abilities allow people to impose new tags by force of number, not to
mention you 'orrible lot forever bombarding the poor newbie to use JOSM or
else. ;)
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discu
But the data in this case is actively misleading (it breaks, for
example, "nearest post office"-type searches) so should be deleted.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@o
fault to
assuming "this was built to cycleway standards" (i.e. paved) rather than
"this is just a path of some sort" (i.e. who knows). Though by all means do
add surface=paved (or =asphalt) for clarity.
Richard
--
Sent from: http:
1 - 100 of 5029 matches
Mail list logo