Re: [Talk-ca] Imported frustrations

2011-10-06 Per discussione john whelan
It is a major problem, hopefully some one will run a bot and at least take out the duplicate imports. Many mappers only think in terms of paper so if it looks OK on a render then its OK. In Ottawa which is smaller and easier to handle we had a meeting of local mappers who some time ago because

Re: [Talk-ca] Imported frustrations

2011-10-06 Per discussione john whelan
It's not just the imports, even mappers adding roads, footpaths etc. from GPS tracks often do not join their work to existing roads and ways. at least the CANVEC imports do link the road sections together. Cheerio John On 6 October 2011 20:04, Adam Dunn dunna...@gmail.com wrote: I think this

Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure

2011-10-05 Per discussione john whelan
Just a comment, local mappers is difficult to define. Call a meeting six people turn up and make a decision? I don't have any answers on this one but inconsistent local decisions makes life more difficult for people trying to use data from different places. Routing renders / maps spring to mind.

Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure

2011-10-04 Per discussione john whelan
We have a similar problem in Ottawa with English and French. Politically French is given equal weight but reality is most maps have English street names etc. We also had one or two entries that combined English and French which meant they were difficult to read and extremely difficult to search.

Re: [Talk-ca] BC Open Data License compatibility

2011-09-07 Per discussione john whelan
No, it was put in because we didn't want to have a rerun of all this mess if something better came along next time. Steve Unfortunately it had implications that don't seem to have been thought through especially for imports which I think are important for Canada where we seem to have lots of

Re: [Talk-ca] BC Open Data License compatibility

2011-09-04 Per discussione john whelan
The issue with using data like this with OSM is when you contribute it under the new contribution terms you accept that OSM can change the license at a later date. Practically speaking it makes it impossible to respect any other license so currently only PD data and things you have explicitly

Re: [OSM-talk] Combined bicycle footway

2011-08-22 Per discussione john whelan
In Ottawa Canada most are designated multi-use footpaths so you can sky, cycle etc. However the rules are different for municipal government paths than federal government paths, and not all paths are signed. I understand provincial parks and cycle paths have slightly different rules again.

Re: [OSM-talk] Combined bicycle footway

2011-08-20 Per discussione john whelan
There are many different ways to render cycle and footpaths and a number of different ways to indicate them as well. You can create your own custom rendering rules but in view of all the differences floating around I suspect the defaults work fine for most people. For example locally we have

Re: [Talk-ca] Tagging sharrows (On-road markings for bicycle-automobile shared lane)

2011-08-19 Per discussione john whelan
In Ottawa we have paved shoulders which show up on the city's cycle maps as recommended. You can tag them but the normal rendering doesn't really show them on a cycle map. I set something up using Maperitive

Re: [OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au

2011-07-11 Per discussione john whelan
OSM is two things one is a set of technical standards, that's the easy part, the other is a group of people which is much more difficult. People can feel frustrated because their concerns are not being addressed an a solution is being imposed. Personally my preference is for an accurate map with

Re: [OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au

2011-07-11 Per discussione john whelan
It's a very sad day when OSM boasts that it includes data that shouldn't be there because of licensing. I inadvertently included some grey material and requested it be deleted from OSM, that request was ignored. Doesn't say much about OSM's ethics does it? Cheerio John (Mind you, the new

Re: [OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au

2011-07-11 Per discussione john whelan
others build the maps that combine imports with user data. Cheerio John On 11 July 2011 09:23, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, On 07/11/11 15:17, john whelan wrote: I inadvertently included some grey material and requested it be deleted from OSM, that request was ignored

Re: [OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au

2011-07-11 Per discussione john whelan
such that the data should not be included in OSM. Cheerio John On 11 July 2011 09:23, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, On 07/11/11 15:17, john whelan wrote: I inadvertently included some grey material and requested it be deleted from OSM, that request was ignored. Are you a different John

Re: [OSM-talk] shortened names

2011-07-07 Per discussione john whelan
Occasionally some one may wish to add a translation or find the street programmatically. For example using Maperitive and a local copy to search for the street. Having the full name helps enormously. End users don't like having to try high street, high St. etc until they find the right

Re: [OSM-talk] [Imports] import of data - which account to use?

2011-06-23 Per discussione john whelan
Current thinking is to use a separate account for bulk imports. Occasionally things go wrong and its easier to roll back under a separate account. Having said that when the import is merged with existing data in JOSM then uploaded things become not so black and white. In general with the new CT

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=cycleway or highway=path

2011-06-22 Per discussione john whelan
One of the advantages of OSM is you can tag anything with what ever tag you like. One of the great drawbacks of OSM is you can tag anything with what ever tag you like. For Ottawa I used Maperitive and imported a local OSM database. Then I used the export tags command to export a list of tags in

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=cycleway or highway=path

2011-06-22 Per discussione john whelan
:31, schrieb john whelan: For Ottawa we had a problem with paved shoulders, you need them for a good cycle-map but they don't seem to have them in Europe. We also have multiuse paths which tagged with all sorts of things. Nearly all motorways in Europe (that's a bit of a blanket statement

Re: [OSM-talk] License/CT issues: Let's not punish the world's disadvantaged, pls.

2011-06-22 Per discussione john whelan
I absolutely agree. Cheerio John On 22 June 2011 19:29, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 13:49 -0700, Steve Coast wrote: Personally I hope as soon as possible. I suspect it will be nice to give you 'no' guys some time to reconsider, as some already have.

Re: [OSM-talk] Join the OSMF !

2011-06-20 Per discussione john whelan
Just a comment using the term Troll appears as if it is intended to provoke an emotional response. Surely we should be able to stick to issues and resolve them rather than descend into emotions? Cheerio John On 20 June 2011 11:56, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote: On 6/18/2011 12:54 PM,

Re: [OSM-talk] Announce: Beginning of Phase 4 of license change process

2011-06-15 Per discussione john whelan
I'm also very interested in this. Thanks John On 15 June 2011 06:44, Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:33 +0200, Michael Collinson wrote: As per the implementation plan [1], we intend to move to phase 4 this Sunday 19th June or as soon after as is

Re: [OSM-talk] Can I say yes to the ODbL if I can't account for 100% of my data?

2011-06-15 Per discussione john whelan
Exactly my own situation, except following poor advice I accepted the new CT. Apparently it is not possible to change the CT status and my formal request to have my suspect data deleted seems to have been ignored. My recommendation is not to accept the CT, and reenter those items that you did

[Talk-ca] Finding buried treasure in OSM

2011-06-13 Per discussione john whelan
Just something for a rainy day if you have a local .OSM file lying around. Within OSM sometimes things get lost. A bus stop gets tagged amenity=bustop rather than the recommended way on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features. The problem is that this particular bus stop will remain

Re: [OSM-talk] Join the OSMF !

2011-06-11 Per discussione john whelan
I don't think things are black and white, you speak of rejecting the new license which seems a little strong. I think there are some issues to deal with and some implications. If we are talking about making the basic OSM map based on direction observation, and I think we are, then I think the

Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?

2011-06-08 Per discussione john whelan
I tend to be very conservative, there shouldn't be any problems but some data I have a verbal OK for CC-by-SA but CC-by-ODBL was not understood. Cheerio John On 8 June 2011 11:49, Gordon Dewis gor...@pinetree.org wrote: No problem... I don't have any qualms about the data vis-a-vis the various

Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?

2011-06-07 Per discussione john whelan
this consent. --G On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:50 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: No at the time the data was added there wasn't a problem. The problem arose when the new CT retroactively changed the previously inserted data. Cheerio John On 6 June 2011 18:30, Gordon Dewis gor

Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?

2011-06-07 Per discussione john whelan
Treat his edits as vandalism and proceed accordingly. Virtual ban When a contributor is subject to a 'virtual ban' (see notes above) then all their past work may be removed and all new work will be reverted without review until they possibly contact the Data Working Group and request a review of

Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?

2011-06-07 Per discussione john whelan
that have been manually surveyed back in later. Thanks Cheerio John On 7 June 2011 13:24, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:24 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: I would be extremely happy to see all my edits removed. Earlier you said that you were

Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?

2011-06-07 Per discussione john whelan
begun. I have looked at some of the features deleted and some of them only list him in the history when he deleted them. -Original Message- From: Samuel Longiaru longi...@shaw.ca Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:34:44 To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan

Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?

2011-06-07 Per discussione john whelan
. -- *From: * john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com *Date: *Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:32:11 -0400 *To: *gor...@pinetree.org *Cc: *Samuel Longiarulongi...@shaw.ca; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org *Subject: *Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan? some of them only list him in the history when

Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?

2011-06-06 Per discussione john whelan
Acting on your advice I accepted the new CT. On looking more deeply into the subject I note that I have retrospectively allowed OSM to license anything I have ever added to the map in any way they wish. Currently it is odbl but the CT allows anything, the license seems to be an ever changing

Re: [Talk-ca] Ping John Whelan?

2011-06-06 Per discussione john whelan
added were added under the terms he agreed to and retroactively changing his mind and deleting everything is not an acceptable option. Your unilateral actions have impacted more than just your data. That is what John should do. On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:21 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com

Re: [OSM-talk] naming an item in multiple languages

2011-05-30 Per discussione john whelan
We have the same sort of thing in Canada. Ottawa is a particular problem as the streets have both an English name and a French name. The way I've set up Ottawa is to use name=Albert Street and name:frrue Albert. The normal rendering systems show the English name but I have a set of rules set up

[Talk-ca] height data

2011-05-27 Per discussione john whelan
There seems to be considerable interest in flooding recently. The UK has a government site http://maps.environment-agency.gov.uk/wiyby/wiybyController?ep=maptopicslang=_e that shows the risk of flooding for a particular area. How would you obtain / insert height data into OSM? Thanks John

Re: [OSM-talk] Breaking up is hard to do (was New Logo in the Wiki)

2011-05-04 Per discussione john whelan
I think that has been done with the change to the Contribution Terms and licensing. Cheerio John On 4 May 2011 13:02, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote: I can't, but that wasn't clear to me. It's also dominant in air traffic control. It seems a little flimsy as a base reason to break up

Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki

2011-04-30 Per discussione john whelan
Just a comment, I suspect the discussion we are having about the changes to the logo and license etc are a symptom of something much deeper. I do get the feeling that there is a disconnect between what is being perceived and what the intentions are. There seems to be a perception floating in the

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Per discussione john whelan
else say don't worry about it. Thanks John On 15 April 2011 03:55, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: On 15 April 2011 00:38, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: If data is tainted in a way that makes in incompatible with the currently used license then it will have

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-14 Per discussione john whelan
Unfortunately I some of my edits used some sources that looked fine under the for CC-by-SA terms but on closer inspection of the ODBL terms, which was done after I blindly followed the advice of another contributor, I am not at all comfortable that the work would stand up legally for CC-by-ODBL

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-14 Per discussione john whelan
If data is tainted in a way that makes in incompatible with the currently used license then it will have to be removed in order not to put the project at risk (e.g. data copied from proprietary sources). This is independent of the license change. I assume that the currently used license means to

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM is dying (was Re: We Need to Stop Google's Exploitation of Open Communities)

2011-04-11 Per discussione john whelan
I think you need to go more basic and ask what are the requirements? I don't think its ever been done. What are we trying to do and who is the target audience? Are we trying to create a map that can be used by others? Are we a social group that enjoys mapping? Why are we doing this? There

Re: [OSM-talk] Analysing the OSM community

2011-03-28 Per discussione john whelan
Speaking as someone with a background in science I think I agree with Elizabeth's interpretation. I get the impression the study is much more subjective than solid, the sample size far too small to get any meaningful results other than this needs more research dollars to further define etc etc.

Re: [OSM-talk] Cost of tolls

2011-03-11 Per discussione john whelan
Boat launch sites locally have the same issue. Cheerio John On 11 March 2011 10:34, Diego Woitasen di...@woitasen.com.ar wrote: Hi, Mapping the tolls of a highway a found that there is no tag to assign the cost of the toll. I haven't found examples in taginfo or tagwatch. Are you using

Re: [Talk-ca] Batch transformation from rcn_ref=1 to Route

2011-03-10 Per discussione john whelan
One technique is simply to use JOSM, select the ways you want to modify then add the tag to all the ways in the selection. You can also delete tags in this way as well. Just be aware that standardization seems to be a word that OSM is not always comfortable with. The other technique if you are

Re: [Talk-ca] Canvec vs. GPS

2011-03-06 Per discussione john whelan
Being cynical I'd tend to favour CANVEC they tend to have spent more money on their GPS units. Cheerio John On 6 March 2011 20:44, Samuel Dyck samueld...@gmail.com wrote: Hey everyone I am presently preparing a careful import of Canvec data into Mantario area. I have stumbled across a trail

[OSM-talk] odbl

2011-03-05 Per discussione john whelan
The intention is to try to understand a bit more about it. I think I understood what CC-by-SA meant and added information based on that understanding. Now the rules have changed and I'm not clear about data I have added in the past, now labelled odbl and if it met the new criteria at the time I

Re: [OSM-talk] all our addresses are belong to you

2011-03-03 Per discussione john whelan
To put it in context in Ottawa, a city of roughly one million people, we currently have 120,000 addr:housenumber or addresses, this would give us an additional three. I'd much prefer them to add in the footpaths that are in the OSM map of Ottawa so their walking and public transport routing

Re: [Talk-ca] all our addresses are belong to you

2011-03-02 Per discussione john whelan
There is a fair amount of address information in the CANVEC files. Cheerio John On 2 March 2011 15:55, flambe...@gmail.com flambe...@gmail.com wrote: MapQuest is providing several address files that contain user-provided latitude and longitude locations across the world. Our users provided

Re: [OSM-talk] [HOT] Nametagging: Local script versus international latin script (for Libya)

2011-03-01 Per discussione john whelan
...@stephans-server.de wrote: On 01.03.2011 00:42, john whelan wrote: I have a couple of basic VB programs that can take a local .OSM file and add a name:fr field to street names, it also does a little look up to translate the street name type. You just take the output and feed it into JOSM

Re: [OSM-talk] [HOT] Nametagging: Local script versus international latin script (for Libya)

2011-02-28 Per discussione john whelan
I have a couple of basic VB programs that can take a local .OSM file and add a name:fr field to street names, it also does a little look up to translate the street name type. You just take the output and feed it into JOSM and upload the changes. As with all bots and such tools its best to have

Re: [OSM-talk] Addresses

2011-02-28 Per discussione john whelan
Tricky because of the accuracy. My money would be to add a two fields and put the lat and long coordinates in there. I'd also use a database rather than Excel such as SQL server there are better validation tools available. Then you really need manual verification you have the correct location.

Re: [OSM-talk] Addresses

2011-02-28 Per discussione john whelan
and simply use the ones which have a 1-1 mapping (city, country, state/province, postal code, phone). Leave the address for someone else. J.M. *From:* john whelan [mailto:jwhelan0...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, February 28, 2011 3:58 PM *To:* John-Michael Wiley *Cc:* talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Tools for a better tomorrow

2011-02-21 Per discussione john whelan
I think you have to accept that many imports come through JOSM, the incident that initiated this thread wasn't an import problem as such just an incorrect selection and hitting the delete key too quickly in JOSM. Given the turn over of new people collaboration will always be a problem especially

Re: [OSM-talk] Search by Key

2011-01-29 Per discussione john whelan
Maperitive can do this quite nicely, use a local .osm file and the find commands, these can be scripted to make it easier for end users to search for things that need multiple tags searched. Cheerio John On 29 January 2011 06:53, Mahsa Ghasemi m.ghas...@student.unimelb.edu.auwrote: I am trying

Re: [OSM-talk] Generating a street directory from OSM?

2011-01-17 Per discussione john whelan
Maperitive can export a list of tags in comma delimited format, these include street names so just edit the output. Cheerio John On 17 January 2011 21:00, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Wondered if anyone has ever put effort into producing a street directory from OSM data.

Re: [Talk-ca] CanVec Import

2010-12-31 Per discussione john whelan
Probably the best thing to do is wait for commonmap. Cheerio John On 31 December 2010 11:50, Olivier Hill olivier.h...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I would like to remind everyone not to blindly import CanVec tiles on OSM. I have recently seen tiles uploaded blindly, duplicating nodes and

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim US places

2010-12-30 Per discussione john whelan
I raised the issue of Canadian post code support some time ago and some changes appear to have been made to Nominatim to use a North American site for Canadian post code and I think for the full US postal services Zip code. Try a long US zip code and see what happens. Cheerio John On 30

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM server on a (Ubuntu) VM?

2010-12-21 Per discussione john whelan
In general databases and Virtual machines do not work well together. Databases tend to want fast disk accesses and the virtual machine bit slows these down. Also typically virtual machines restrict the memory and databases use the memory to reduce disk accesses so you get a second hit there.

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM server on a (Ubuntu) VM?

2010-12-21 Per discussione john whelan
On small databases where performance isn't that critical they will work under virtual machines but larger databases are different. I was responsible for running large central database servers at Statistics Canada and we had a server support area who thought Virtual Machines were the only way to

Re: [OSM-talk] Bing maps is misplaced

2010-12-19 Per discussione john whelan
Just a comment locally someone did a trace and managed to get one end of the road about 100 meters out and connected at the wrong road junction. Took me a while to sort it out. Cheerio John On 19 December 2010 19:18, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: OK, but there will likely be additional details

Re: [OSM-talk] Objects versions ready for ODbL

2010-12-19 Per discussione john whelan
I'm probably in the same state. I suspect the only honest thing to do is to request that all my data be removed. It seems a bit extreme but could that be done? Yes I did agree to the ODBL change but that was taking advice from some one who I now realise was bias and I didn't go through the

Re: [Talk-ca] Fire Hydrant Data for Toronto

2010-12-17 Per discussione john whelan
Check the license on this data very carefully their idea of Open currently doesn't align with OpenStreetMap. They have a working group looking into the matter currently. Also have a look at the road system where you are thinking of importing. If its a mish-mash of GPS, Satellite traced then the

Re: [OSM-talk] Viewing English street names in israel.

2010-12-12 Per discussione john whelan
I'm doing it quite nicely with Maperitive. I first wrote a VB program that runs down an OSM file extracted by JOSM. It populates name:fr where blank according to a set of rules that only work locally. You load the OSM file back into JOSM and upload the changes. Then you just tell Maperitive to

Re: [OSM-talk] Unsetting CT flag

2010-12-07 Per discussione john whelan
I used to create government procurements, big messy ones where sales guys would hit the prime minister's office to protest and get fired fifteen minutes after a debriefing when they lost. When dealing with potential problems from egos I always found it very helpful to build a list of requirements

Re: [Talk-ca] [nzopengis] Re: python script to find duplicates

2010-12-05 Per discussione john whelan
An example is locally CANVEC still has a rail line that it was taken out some time ago. Cheerio John On 5 December 2010 03:54, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, (sorry if im a broken record) I know that Daniel and the NRCan-CanVec data team are desparatly trying to figure

Re: [OSM-talk] Suggestion for an Unconference

2010-11-26 Per discussione john whelan
This is a fun one. CANVEC has address ranges for some Canadian provinces. Locally after I imported the address ranges I found the missing streets because you just have the two address lines with no road in the middle. Working with others such as CANVEC does provide a method of cross checking for

Re: [OSM-talk] Suggestion for an Unconference

2010-11-26 Per discussione john whelan
Certainly in Canada we have been having licensing issues with some levels of government to be able to include their data in OSM. Part of the problem is the open ended nature of the new license, the bit where OSM says Oh and we can change the data license to anything we want to in the future. On

Re: [OSM-talk] Suggestion for an Unconference

2010-11-25 Per discussione john whelan
Just a comment from one of the 130 who has voted yes on the recommendation of one of the people I thought was fairly sensible here and I now regret taking his advice. I now strongly suspect I should have spent six months wading through through the legal talk side of things rather than mapping

Re: [OSM-talk] New site about the license change

2010-11-16 Per discussione john whelan
I think that the problems and implications of the change were not well explained or even understood at the time. I'm not even sure they are today by many people. My training in computer system design suggests that listing the requirements and concerns of the various users might be a useful

Re: [OSM-talk] New site about the license change

2010-11-15 Per discussione john whelan
I've been a little selective in quoting your message but I think you have correctly identified the split. Germany and the UK with high mapper density are probably for the new license and dumping the older data other parts of the world that don't have the luxury of such a high density of mappers

Re: [OSM-talk] New site about the license change

2010-11-14 Per discussione john whelan
from the database. Cheerio John On 14 November 2010 08:24, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote: On 13/11/2010 20:01, john whelan wrote: Have a look around Turkey Street Station in Enfield sometime in North London where I understand Steve C has done a lot of mapping and you are literally

Re: [OSM-talk] Google expands their map data

2010-11-13 Per discussione john whelan
Building something that is user friendly is actually quite difficult and takes a lot more resources and testing than you might think. It really needs a consistent integrated well planned team approach which isn't quite what OSM is. We just have a lot of people who do their own thing. Including

Re: [OSM-talk] New site about the license change

2010-11-13 Per discussione john whelan
I'd like to be reassured that any effort I put into mapping will be useful, ie we'll have a useful map at the end, not a blank page with two footpaths on it. Have a look around Turkey Street Station in Enfield sometime in North London where I understand Steve C has done a lot of mapping and you

Re: [OSM-talk] New site about the license change

2010-11-13 Per discussione john whelan
*The decisions have been made, so it's time to accept them or if you don't, to leave.* Thank you for your views on the OSM community. In my view it is a community and the relationship does need nurturing. Nowhere in my post did I express a view that a change of license is bad. However changes

Re: [OSM-talk] New site about the license change

2010-11-13 Per discussione john whelan
Look down your entire message was under my text. Cheerio John On 13 November 2010 18:44, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: This is a really unfair thing of you to have done, to take a very long (1 page) email, quote a single sentence and then repost it to a group. - Serge

[OSM-talk] Existing data

2010-11-13 Per discussione john whelan
Can some one check my logic please, and note I am not advocating that someone should do it only that we should think about the implications before it happens. Today OSM is licensed in a way that means in round terms you can basically do whatever you like with it. The new system will be licensed

Re: [OSM-talk] How do I go about doing this?

2010-11-08 Per discussione john whelan
There are other rendering solutions such as Maperitive which give you control over what is rendered. There are tags such as florist which are in features wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features but not rendered by the default schemes. Even with the web rendering there are things such as

Re: [Talk-ca] UBC, Vancouver orthography, and street alignment

2010-10-31 Per discussione john whelan
I was under the impression that the City of Vancouver Open data along with Ottawa's and Calgary's wasn't quite open enough for OSM use. I assume you aligned with CANVEC data and merely visually confirmed it against Vancouver's data? I understand they were looking at changing the license, if you

Re: [OSM-talk] How can we make this list better?

2010-10-20 Per discussione john whelan
Perhaps recognise that OSM is changing and developing in ways it's creators never intended? I'm currently looking at a project that uses data that is not cc-by-ca by any means however it can be imported into an OSM file format and use the OSM tool set to basically create a stand alone DVD that is

Re: [Talk-ca] Sask road network

2010-10-17 Per discussione john whelan
Have a look at the CANVEC OSM data available for importing, use JOSM select then merge. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canvec Nominatimhttp://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/will find post codes but not individual houses. CANVEC has address ranges in some provinces. Cheerio John On 16

Re: [Talk-ca] Sask road network

2010-10-17 Per discussione john whelan
Road names are available in Canvec for Ontario at least. Cheerio John On 17 October 2010 08:06, Steve Singer ssinger...@sympatico.ca wrote: On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Jamie Figursky wrote: Hello, I noticed that that the road network for Saskatchewan has gaps (Oxbow area and others).

Re: [OSM-talk] Response to A critique of OpenStreetMap

2010-10-14 Per discussione john whelan
Just a comment not all the data is the map database is presented on these map renders. I've been using Maperitive to selectively select data to be displayed for a particular purpose and working with the rule set to display the information in the way I wish it to be displayed. Working with a

[OSM-talk] How does one get the default cyclemap rendering amended?

2010-10-11 Per discussione john whelan
If I look at the default map displayed on the web site then select base layer cycle map I get nice blue lines on roads with cycle lanes, and cycle paths which is perfect. However in Ontario we have paved shoulders which are tagged shoulder:access:bicycle=yes, together with shoulder:surface=paved

Re: [OSM-talk] What are my options for printing a large-scale complete map?

2010-10-10 Per discussione john whelan
Maperitive will zoom to level 19 rather than 18 gives a bit more detail. You can modify the rule set to control what is displayed. I have seen someone use JOSM on a laptop working with a stored local file to do this. This has the advantage that you can just upload the changes directly. Cheerio

Re: [OSM-talk] IP ban?

2010-09-30 Per discussione john whelan
Welcome to the Internet. Unfortunately this is a down side of the Internet some connections are better than others. It depends on the capacity and volume of traffic that is running through each of the same hops as you are using and the addresses in the servers that are used to route the traffic.

[Talk-ca] Fwd: [CivicAccess-discuss] Fun Stuff - Mapping Stereotypes

2010-09-30 Per discussione john whelan
European and you need to scroll down to see them all. It may give some helpful background to understand comments in OSM talk otherwise totally irrelevant to Ca-talk. http://alphadesigner.com/project-mapping-stereotypes.html?ref=nf Cheerio John -- Forwarded message -- From:

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] In what direction should OSM go?

2010-09-29 Per discussione john whelan
My view is there are very different requirements in different countries. Countries such as Australia, US, Canada have much lower population densities than many European countries. It's just not practical to rely on people with GPS devices and cycles. Yes there is tracing from satellite images

Re: [OSM-talk] From the register

2010-09-28 Per discussione john whelan
Just a comment from a security point of view a message with just a link in it is often a link to Malware. The links have two parts a visible part and a nonvisible bit that takes you to a web site. If one looks doubtful the recommendation is to copy the visible link and paste it in the browser

[Talk-ca] Rendering rules and tagging paths and hard shoulders for cycles

2010-09-28 Per discussione john whelan
I realise there is some differences of opinion on this but I'm looking for guidance. Locally we seem to have a number of these tagged in different ways. CANVEC appears to tag some of them as highway=footway wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Paths seems to have a wide range of acceptable options,

Re: [Talk-ca] Rendering rules and tagging paths and hard shoulders for cycles

2010-09-28 Per discussione john whelan
[http://www.flickr.com/photos/canadagood/3017259090/] or [http://www.flickr.com/photos/alanstanton/2319965160/]. Good to include photos of what you're thinking of. Adam On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:46 AM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: I realise there is some differences of opinion

Re: [Talk-ca] Where's the Canvec data hiding these days?

2010-09-24 Per discussione john whelan
Your link worked for me 30 seconds ago. Cheerio John On 24 September 2010 20:40, James Ewen ve6...@gmail.com wrote: I've been trying to get to the canvec data for 3 days now using this URL: ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/osm/pub I was pretty sure that you could get into there with a browser

Re: [Talk-ca] Ottawa - OpenData - Map Feature Catelogue

2010-09-23 Per discussione john whelan
I'm not certain what the point would be if the licensing doesn't line up. What would be nice would be if some one could take one or two of the data sets, flip it into OSM format and email it to me. That way I can merge it with a copy of the cities OSM data on a USB stick and show a couple of

Re: [OSM-talk] Partnership between OSM and local government?

2010-09-21 Per discussione john whelan
This is a major concern of mine, which is why I won't even bother asking for local government data at the moment even though it is being offered. Some one else can do the asking and explaining about the flexible licensing we seem to be asking for because I don't want the responsibility of asking

[Talk-ca] CANVEC 6.0 OSM Files leisure=sport_centre

2010-09-13 Per discussione john whelan
I think according to wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features it should be leisure=sports_centre Cheerio John ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing CanVec

2010-09-12 Per discussione john whelan
The CANVEC data is available her ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/osm/pub Read this page first: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec especially the bit about the tiles. I would suggest you load up a tile in JOSM then hit the download arrow to bring in the same area from OSM. I usually resize

Re: [Talk-transit] [GTFS import] How to automatically add bus stops to relations?

2010-09-08 Per discussione john whelan
What is the licensing on the GTFS data? Thanks John On 8 September 2010 10:26, Michał Borsuk michal.bor...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. Thanks to Roland Olbricht's Public Transport plugin, I have successfully merged existing bus stops with my GTFS data. There was a part of the work that required

[Talk-ca] ridethecity.com

2010-09-05 Per discussione john whelan
I understand its based on OpenStreetMap but does any one know any much about it? Is it implemented in any Canadian cities? Do I assume that roads would have to actually be joined for this or any routing program to work? Thanks John ___ Talk-ca

[Talk-ca] Meet up Ottawa on Friday evening

2010-09-01 Per discussione john whelan
It will happen and so far it looks like we might have half a dozen people, but I don't have a time or place yet. If you can make it email me and I'll let you know more details as soon as I get them, if you have a suggestion for time and place email me as well. Thanks John

Re: [Talk-transit] How to map named bus stop platform/positions

2010-08-31 Per discussione john whelan
Since most renders only display the name to make it useful to the casual map user I'd suggest A name or B name in the name field. There is a similar problem with the GTFS stop_code. Cheerio John On 31 August 2010 14:17, Magnus Bäck ba...@swipnet.se wrote: In the Skånetrafiken public transport

[OSM-talk] Garmin Recalling 1,250,000 Units Over Fire Hazard

2010-08-27 Per discussione john whelan
Details here, I don't think its the hand held variety but better to check and be safe. Cut and paste this link into your browser rather than click on it to reduce the risk of landing somewhere nasty. http://www.tomsguide.com/us/fire-burn-hazard-warning-nuvi,news-7867.html Thanks John

Re: [Talk-ca] Adressing

2010-08-27 Per discussione john whelan
The note came from me, the problem is two fold, the first is every section of a road junction gets addressing information so a slip road that is 20 meters long perhaps gets addressing information when it has no buildings and the addressing information contains either 0 or -1 this basically adds

Re: [Talk-ca] Fwd: GeoBase vs CanVec

2010-08-23 Per discussione john whelan
The CANVEC tiles contain the full street name. Ottawa has a number of streets that were imported from Geobase that did not include a street name, contained abbreviation or only part of the name. This maybe because of the way the import was done but the CANVEC data seemed cleaner in this regard.

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >