Re: [Talk-us] Mapping rail trails

tion for US 340, although it spans MD, VA (in two sections), and WV.) Since there's only a short section of the C&O Canal Trail in DC, I don't really see the harm in putting all of its ways into a single relation. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://ap

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping rail trails

9773990 I suppose it is a little silly to have a separate DC portion; I could just go combine them into a single relation. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- The Old Man and the S

Re: [Talk-us] US map rendering (Was: Re: Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet))

* Phil! Gold [2019-03-08 17:44 -0500]: > https://gitlab.com/asciiphil/osm-shields Oops, that's the master branch, which doesn't have the changes. You need to look at the svg branch: https://gitlab.com/asciiphil/osm-shields/traa/svg -- ...computer contrarian of the first or

Re: [Talk-us] US map rendering (Was: Re: Spot elevations collected as natural=peak and name=Point (height in feet))

* Kevin Kenny [2019-03-08 14:25 -0500]: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:37 AM Martijn van Exel wrote: > > > > I agree that a local US OSM map with a *subtly* adapted rendering would be > > fantastic. Phil Gold did some interesting work years ago on rendering US > > s

Re: [Talk-us] Representing census-designated places (CDP), Census County Division (CCD), etc

rarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- There's a frood who really knows where his towel is. --- -- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Strategy for Naming Parts of a Large Park

ws all this, but I thought it might be useful information for the discussion.) -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Join the non sequitur society. We may not ma

Re: [Talk-us] Best practices for coastline to Inland Bay / River transition

l region of the river. [0] I know according to some points of view, the entire Chesapeake Bay is just the lowest part of the Susquehanna River, but I'm pretty comfortable leaving the Bay as coastline. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP:

Re: [Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER

armchair-mapped the way to align with aerial imagery but haven't yet been out to verify the road name. (Details about my use of this tag are in this diary entry: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/asciiphil/diary/16247 ) -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.

Re: [Talk-us] Things that are not buildings but are used as one

of a riverboat as a welcome center > http://osm.org/go/Tv8f5t42q?layers=N&way=349671718 > I see nothing wrong with this approach, HMS Belfast is mapped as building=ship, http://osm.org/way/5006061. Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Jolla __

Re: [Talk-us] NYC High Line is Wonky on OSM

'm not sure what the situation is, exactly, for the most northern part of the line; the most recent time I was there, everything past 30th Street and 11th Avenue was closed, so I didn't get a chance to walk the entire thing. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.

Re: [Talk-us] Importing parks and schools for Anne Arundel County MD

* Gregory Arenius [2014-05-30 00:52 -0700]: > The only other thing that stuck out to me about the data was the B & A > trail. You have a polygon for the trail which is awesome but I would also > add in a properly tagged linear way. It will make it possible for routers > to use it as well as re

Re: [Talk-us] OSM Inspector and streets with E/N/S/W in their name

* Frederik Ramm [2014-04-29 21:05 +0200]: > In looking at its current error messages and warnings, I find many > situations in the US where the way itself has a name tag of "South Apple > Tree Road" but the house has an addr:street tag of just "Apple Tree > Road". This leads to a "street not found

Re: [Talk-us] State ref tags on ways

* Elliott Plack [2014-03-28 02:53 -0400]: > Interesting note about this in Maryland. My friend Mike showed me that some > mappers have been using the *county* route numbers on some county roads in > Maryland. Since Maryland counties don't sign their route numbers[0], they're using unsigned_ref=,

Re: [Talk-us] NAIP Imagery Servers -- Need Assistance Setting Up in JOSM

* Kam, Kristen -(p) [2014-03-24 17:26 +]: > The other week, I came across the directory of USDA's WMS NAIP Image > Services (by state). QGIS renders the images with no problem, but it > appears to fail in JOSM. If it helps, OSM-US hosts a tile proxy for the USGS-hosted NAIP imagery. It's docu

Re: [Talk-us] OpenStreetMap Isn't All That Open, Let's Change That and Drop Share-Alike

luable is the community of people contributing to it, and the license on the data needs to reinforce that community, not allow proprietary data uses to splinter it. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22

Re: [Talk-us] State ref tags on ways: Use of unique ISO/ANSI/USPS 2-letter state codes in RELATIONS as well as WAYS?

know about the modifier tag.) I don't know of any data consumers that make use of the modifier tag currently, but there weren't many consumers making use of route relations in general before the shield rendering. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil

Re: [Talk-us] Railroads and Railroads (Historic)

* nathan proudfoot [2013-11-10 13:30 -0800]: > I am mostly coming to ask about historic railroads and how to map them. > In my area we have lots of rail trails, these trails mostly have been > mapped by > bicycle=yes > foot=yes > highway=cycleway > horse=yes > name=John Wayne Pioneer Trail > note=

Re: [Talk-us] Question about incorrect data for an administrative area

* Jay Boyer [2013-10-10 13:34 -0700]: > Enterprise is an unincorporated town. But Enterprise is actually part of Las > Vegas and all of the addresses within Enterprise are "Las Vegas" addresses. > > Enterprise is this area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/170132 There are a coupl

Re: [Talk-us] Current status with highway shields?

* Evin Fairchild [2013-10-09 19:54 -0700]: > I emailed Phil Gold (creator of the awesome shield rendering) about this > almost a month ago, but he never responded so this hasn't been fixed. Er, sorry about that. I've been extremely busy for about the past two months, and proba

Re: [Talk-us] Shields are up!

* Michal Migurski [2013-07-29 00:40 -0700]: > I wonder if this would be helpful: I've been generating weekly generalized > datasets of route relations. > > http://openstreetmap.us/~migurski/streets-and-routes/ > > The tiles take a little while to render, so I wonder whether using an > in

Re: [Talk-us] Shields are up!

* Richard Welty [2013-07-29 08:17 -0400]: > one thing to consider in NY, though - not all counties use the > yellow-on-blue pentagonal County Route signs. right now it's > automagically using that style shield for all county routes. > should we deal with this or let it go? I'd prefer to deal with

Re: [Talk-us] Shields are up!

* Toby Murray [2013-07-28 22:38 -0500]: > http://tile.openstreetmap.us/osmus_shields/preview.html Awesome! Thanks for all your work in making this happen! ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-

Re: [Talk-us] Shield rendering and detours; tagging nicknames?

uptake by way of traffic reports? Tulsa's Inner > Dispersal Loop has been called the "Inner Detour Loop" by some reporters. Based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names , I'd say loc_name=. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ P

Re: [Talk-us] Releasing my data into Public Domain

* Elliott Plack [2013-07-18 14:25 -0400]: > Question to you: On our website, we are uncertain as how to say, "The data > is public domain." Can you all provide examples of other sites that provide > data that has been imported into OSM? I don't know of any large sites using it, but this seems to

Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering

* James Mast [2013-07-15 00:36 -0400]: > Man, there are TONS of bannered routes in GA. It might take forever to > find out all of them, even with using GA's own maps to find them. Well, I wrote a tool[0] that looks at the rendering database and gives me a list of route relations without shields.

Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering

banners for their bennered routes...). -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- The ring needs another token. -- BOFH excuse #129 --- -- __

Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering

* Phil! Gold [2013-07-11 15:32 -0400]: > * James Mast [2013-07-11 14:02 -0400]: > > I know that there is a "US 1-9" in NJ, but this error is showing up in NC. > > ;) > > Oh, wow. That *is* a bug. And now it's fixed. :) The replacement code wi

Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering

* James Mast [2013-07-11 14:02 -0400]: > I know that there is a "US 1-9" in NJ, but this error is showing up in NC. ;) Oh, wow. That *is* a bug. I've got to figure out how to handle it, but here's what's going on: Those ways (take http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/11177 as an example

Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering

* Paul Johnson [2013-07-10 10:28 -0500]: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:18 AM, James Mast wrote: > > Also, do you guys think for the "PA Turnpike XXX" routes, that the > > "network" tag for them should be "US:PA:Turnpike" > > That's how I've been handling the Oklahoma situation: US:OK:Turnpike. Yep

Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering

* James Mast [2013-07-10 10:44 -0400]: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/172380289 There are some interesting things going on here. Is this road really part of both US 21 and US 21 Bypass? That seems weird to me, but if someone says that's how the road's signed I'll believe it (see: US

Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations

* Paul Johnson [2013-07-10 10:16 -0500]: > I don't think we hit a consensus, did we? Seems like we were talking > about whether having a modifier tag or not, and if not, including the > banner in the network. As I documented at http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Highway-Shield-Rendering-tt5612357.ht

Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering

* Richard Welty [2013-07-10 09:58 -0400]: > an NJTP shield is probably appropriate. the turnpike is _not_ precisely > I-95. I think I was unclear in my question. I have a New Jersey Turnpike shield that I want to use. My question is: should the route relation for the New Jersey Turnpike be tagg

Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering

really the name of the route. What we really need is a tag like name:relation that the editing tools can use for labeling things in their UIs when we want something more descriptive than precise use of the name tag can give us. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic

Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations

* James Mast [2013-07-10 08:59 -0400]: > There is one other. I mentioned it in my e-mail from yesterday > (07-09-13). That is I-295 in Fayetteville. Okay, I've got that one in my rendering now, too. > And to be honest, I thought some people wanted the ":Future" part > dropped out and just put

Re: [Talk-us] Update on highway shield rendering

* James Mast [2013-07-10 03:18 -0400]: > I'm just curious, but how are you going to add shields for all of the > Turnpikes out there that have their shield posted alongside another > route shield (like the PA Turnpike, New York Thruway, Ohio Turnpike as > examples)? Yes. http://elrond.aperiodi

Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations

* James Mast [2013-07-09 01:40 -0400]: > So, does anybody else have any more comments on how we should deal with > tagging these "Future" Interstates? Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form: network=US:I:Future ref= modifier=Future and that only one person of

Re: [Talk-us] Tagging a super-two highway (trunk or motorway?)

n an efficient way. I think it definitely fits as a trunk. I think most of the things I would consider trunk are divided, but I have seen undivided roads that others have tagged trunk and thought, "Yeah, that makes sense there." -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http:/

Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations

fferently. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Photons have neither morality nor visas. -- David Farber --- -- ___

Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations

he value of the modifier tag could be either "Business:Spur" or "Business Spur". -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 2

Re: [Talk-us] Tagging a super-two highway (trunk or motorway?)

* Paul Johnson [2013-06-25 09:40 -0500]: > There seems to be some disagreement on how to handle the super-two (or > super-four s California has a few of) highways. [snip] > I'm under the understanding that the consensus for a motorway would be > fully multiple (at minimum 2) carriageway with limit

[Talk-us] Route Relation Tagging, again (was Re: ref tags)

* Paul Johnson [2013-06-24 09:11 -0500]: > network=US:I > modifier=Future * James Mast [2013-06-25 00:15 -0400]: > Now, I'm going to initially use the following to tag the "Future" > segments inside of relations: network=US:I:Future However, somebody else > suggested this: network=US:I modifier=

Re: [Talk-us] ref tags

* James Mast [2013-06-22 20:04 -0400]: > Yep, here's picture proof that I personally took a few years ago of a "Future > I-26" shield: > http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/rickmastfan67/Interstates/NC/I-26/Img_2043s.jpg Alright. I'll add "Future Interstate shields" to my todo list. Unless

Re: [Talk-us] ref tags

ew rendering of two-digit Interstate shields, which might end up using super relations, if osm2pgsql generates geometries from them, but that's a fairly minor part of the rendering and only applies from zoom 7 to zoom 9. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://a

Re: [Talk-us] Hamlets!

en or Fells Point) should get place=suburb, in a vein similar to the distinctions between place=town/village/hamlet. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- #define NULL 0 /* s

Re: [Talk-us] Hamlets!

I'll just delete it, but that's not tremendously common in my experience..) -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Hofstadter's Law: It

Re: [Talk-us] ref tags

* Clay Smalley [2013-06-20 09:26 -0700]: > Also, even if it were the case that they were the same network, it makes > sense to keep them separate because that is how the shield renderer > determines which shield to put on the road. My shield renderer is pretty flexible. I can assign shields on a

Re: [Talk-us] ref tags

* Martijn van Exel [2013-06-18 10:40 -0600]: > Perhaps we can get together on IRC sometime soon and see what would need to > be done. I can't make tonight but tomorrow early evening (like, 6PM MDT) > would work. Ian, Phil, Toby, are you around then? That's 8pm for m

Re: [Talk-us] ref tags

* Jason Remillard [2013-06-17 22:19 -0400]: > If the way is part of relation that has a ref, and the way itself does > not have a ref, then the relation ref should propagate to the way. Note that the conventions for ref tags are different for relations and ways. A way that is tagged "ref=I 70" s

Re: [Talk-us] ref tags

* Ian Dees [2013-06-18 08:07 -0500]: > Because no one's stepped up to do it! Okay, I should probably put my toes in here. I can spend this weekend cleaning up my code (for http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/ ) and maybe try to get it running on the US server, if there's interest/approval. Note

Re: [Talk-us] Admin boundary level quirk in NYC

ed as admin_level=5). -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- The problem with using C++ ... is that there's already a strong tendency in the language to require you to know

Re: [Talk-us] Baltimore Building Outlines Import

-- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- OOPS! You naughty creature! You didn't run Configure with sh! I will attempt to remedy the situation by running sh for you...

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports-us] Baltimore Building Outlines Import

eriodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- I must first reveal my personal bias in this discussion, since I worship at the First Church of PDF Really Sucks. -- Bruce "

Re: [Talk-us] Airport Tagging

* Rick Marshall [2013-04-23 12:37 -0500]: > 1. How do you mark Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI), Visual > Approach Slope Indicator (VASI), VOR, and other Navigational Aids at > airports. As far as I know, there isn't a widespread way of tagging these things. I turned up this wiki page:

Re: [Talk-us] parcel data in OSM

* Jason Remillard [2012-12-28 16:16 -0500]: > So the question is, what should the exact criteria be for including an > "open space" parcel in OSM. Consider some of the various types of > property. I've used parcel data as a layer in JOSM to trace from. It lets me be a little more accourate about

Re: [Talk-us] Fixing shorelines

* Jeff Meyer [2012-12-13 12:58 -0800]: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Phil! Gold wrote: > > I use tilestache to go between > > JOSM's tile underlays and the ArcGIS REST interface). > > Do you have a pointer to any docs of how to do this? It's pretty si

Re: [Talk-us] Fixing shorelines

* Eric H. Christensen [2012-12-13 21:54 -0500]: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:23:52PM -0500, Phil! Gold wrote: > > If you use JOSM, the ContourMerge plugin is very helpful here. > > Thanks for the advice. I've tried that technique and it seems to have > done what I wan

Re: [Talk-us] Fixing shorelines

* Eric H. Christensen [2012-12-11 21:24 -0500]: > Is there a good way to make the PGS-sourced data match the Tiger data in > certain areas to improve the accuracy? If you use JOSM, the ContourMerge plugin is very helpful here. You can select nodes on each of the TIGER and PGS ways near where th

Re: [Talk-us] Dual Carriageway?

* Jim McAndrew [2012-11-29 12:18 -0700]: > From looking around on OSM, it doesn't seem like people are marking roads > with a garden in the middle of the road as a dual carriageway, maybe they > should be? For short islands in the middle of a road (like the links you gave), I usually don't map as

Re: [Talk-us] TIGER expansion bot

* Serge Wroclawski [2012-11-27 11:33 -0500]: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Brian May wrote: > > Another clarification for this use case: > > A user changes the original highway name tag from "Main St SW" to "SW Main > > Street", but did not alter the tiger tags. > > I haven't seen any examp

Re: [Talk-us] Feature proposal: proposed expanded address tagging scheme for US

* Steven Johnson [2012-11-17 18:45 -0500]: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/UnitedStates >From my perspective, addr:street_prefix and addr:street_type don't seem that useful, since I don't see how they add information that's useful to data consumers and they re

Re: [Talk-us] US State Shield rendering - Modifiers

* Mike N [2012-11-13 09:38 -0500]: > WOOT! We may have hooked a new US mapper because of the shield > rendering on the test shield development server! Awesome! > That leads to a related question - what is the best way to tag for > modified state routes. For example in South Carolina: > >

Re: [Talk-us] What to do with unnamed NHD streams

rst order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Miskatonic University Alumni Association Go pods! --- -- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Another random road reclassification

* Toby Murray [2012-08-14 23:26 -0500]: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.117&lon=-94.8924&zoom=14&layers=M > > I know there is some disagreement about road classification, > especially when it comes to trunk but I'm pretty sure most people > would agree that this is incorrect. Thoughts? I

Re: [Talk-us] Discardable TIGER tags

* Alan Mintz [2012-07-29 18:54 -0700]: > [1] When combining ways in JOSM (at least), values for tiger:* tags > are combined with ":" (colon) as a delimiter, instead of ";" > (semi-colon). Why, and should this be changed? I believe this behavior was intended to make tiger:tlid merging work a littl

Re: [Talk-us] Post bot cleanup

mostly left them classified highway=residential; I'd prefer to leave road classification to someone more familiar with the area. I plan to start cleaning up I-95 next; it looks like it's got big chunks missing, among other problems. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http

Re: [Talk-us] LA part of the map essentially is unusable

ses for mappers to clean up, there wasn't really a good way forward. The people working on the redaction bot felt that not undeleting would be the better of two bad options. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248

Re: [Talk-us] Post bot cleanup

* Martijn van Exel [2012-07-19 14:22 -0600]: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Toby Murray wrote: > > Any other common problems that people have seen? > > Another thing I find is a lot of leftover stray nodes without any tags. > I select them in JOSM with type:node tags:0 -child and delete the

Re: [Talk-us] Post bot cleanup

* Phil! Gold [2012-07-19 07:50 -0400]: > Probably the most common thing I've seen is what TIGER road splits look > like: one way (usually leading up to a bridge), followed by a string of > unconnected nodes. Fixing these is pretty easy: click along the > unconnected no

Re: [Talk-us] Post bot cleanup

ng to keep in mind. Are there other important, non-obvious tags that it would be good to specifically be checking for? -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Science is built up of fa

Re: [Talk-us] Redaction bot is heading our way!

* Kai Krueger [2012-07-18 18:26 -0700]: > Chris Lawrence-2 wrote > > I've fixed up I-20 between the Columbia River and US 21 > > I also started fixing the I-20 at the intersection to I-77 I also started working on I-20, from the Georgia border. (I had qualms about just going with the first one

Re: [Talk-us] Scenic/Historic byways

* Toby Murray [2012-07-08 14:20 -0500]: > Closer to home I have also seen a "Scenic Byway" sign. This seems to > be an official designation by the US DOT as discussed here: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Scenic_Byway I've done a bit of reading about these, mostly as they pertain to Maryl

Re: [Talk-us] Rails with trails

* Nathan Edgars II [2012-06-27 12:59 -0400]: > But another popular kind of rail trail, a "rail with trail", cannot > be found in this manner. [snip] > Does anyone have any ideas for tagging? The simplest would be > something like rail_with_trail=yes or maybe railway=adjacent. Either of those woul

Re: [Talk-us] holes in Columbus OH?

* Peter Dobratz [2012-06-12 00:45 -0400]: > There seem to be a lot of holes in the multipolygon relation, and it > seems strange to me that there are so many places within the city that > are not part of the city. Is anyone more familiar with this area that > give an explanation for this? It's n

Re: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings

h the imagery. Most of them ended up with lines rotated close to 45 degrees from the actual building's walls (i.e. JOSM's orthogonalization was almost maximally bad in this case). -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC

Re: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings

ing areas look like? -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Go climb a gravity well! --- -- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Abbreviation expansion - USS to United States Ship?

ed at the map to check my tagging, I saw that another part of the WB&A right of way is a Martin Luther King Jr Highway.) -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

ntion is probably sanest. Paul Johnson feels as NE2 does that this means that the network tag no longer represents a distinct network (and that's a bad thing): > Well, that kind of breaks the whole "network" concept then, and the > key should probably be renamed to fit the e

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

* Nathan Edgars II [2012-04-12 15:52 -0400]: > On 4/12/2012 2:59 PM, Phil! Gold wrote: > >* Minh Nguyen [2012-04-12 10:06 -0700]: > >>There's an ALT I-75 that needs its own sequence file > > I wouldn't necessarily oppose a separate network tag in this case, si

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

der... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Hydrogen is a colorless, odorless gas which, given enough time, turns into people. -- Henry Hiebert --- -- __

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

o at > least 6299 so that when people get around to properly tagging the 6000 > series, they will be rendered when necessary. Are there any roads in the 4000s or 5000s? If not, I can skip those and just do the range from 6000 to 6299. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / ht

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

, but it looks like those are unsigned reference numbers for some of the parkways.) -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- You know you're really somebody in the software wor

Re: [Talk-us] Network tag Re: Highway Shield Rendering

* Paul Johnson [2012-04-11 17:33 -0700]: > On Apr 11, 2012 11:48 AM, "Phil! Gold" wrote: > > From what I've read, all US highways in California should get similar > > treatment, in that they're signed with different shields than the standard > > ones. A

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

d that, too. The network=US:KY, ref=AA relation does not appear to include all of the ways with the name "AA Highway" (it looks like the relation ends somewhere around KY 2828). -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BD

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

* Phil! Gold [2012-04-03 17:27 -0400]: > Okay. If there aren't any strenuous objections from other Virginians on > the list, I'll go with US:VA:Secondary for the secondary routes and won't > render them if they're tagged US:VA. I've made this change. It'l

Re: [Talk-us] Network tag Re: Highway Shield Rendering

* Craig Hinners [2012-04-08 07:07 -0700]: > Phil! Gold : > > It seems to me that network=US:US:Business:MD is the logical extension of > > a scheme that has US:US and US:US:Business. > > My initial reaction is that this goes too far in mixing geographic, > classification

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

't really fit into the code reworking I did. They'll return when I get the general-purpose county shield rendering working. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- --

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

* Phil! Gold [2012-04-05 08:14 -0400]: > * Minh Nguyen [2012-04-04 11:54 -0700]: > > Looks like the Indiana Toll Road has no relation yet. > > That's fine. We don't have a shield for it yet either. :) Ah. And that's because my visit to Wikipedia left me unsu

Re: [Talk-us] Network tag Re: Highway Shield Rendering

hem). -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- I'm trying to grow sentient molds to karma whore on slashdot. -- seen on #kuro5hin --- --

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

ref=I 76. Also, the rendering doesn't use the symbol URL. It's not bad to tag it, of course, since it's potentially useful information, but it won't affect our rendering one way or another. > Looks like the Indiana Toll Road has no relation yet. That's fine. We don&

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

fixed with the cutout shields. Because of some changes I'm working on, I don't have the source images to fix the sign style at the moment, so it'll take me a little while to regenerate them. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP:

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

* Nathan Edgars II [2012-04-04 11:51 -0400]: > (By the way, if it wasn't clear, you've done some good work here.) Thank you. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 ---

Re: [Talk-us] Network tag Re: Highway Shield Rendering

US:US:Business:MD network once I made them, but I haven't gotten to those yet. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- my htaccess ban finger is

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

OSM one, maybe you could reduce > the prominence of standard highway labels on residential/unclassified > highways: > http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=15&lat=38.78332&lon=-77.30564&layers=B0 > https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4183 Ooof. I'm trying to limit

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

* Nathan Edgars II [2012-04-04 10:41 -0400]: > On 4/2/2012 11:35 AM, Phil! Gold wrote: > >For things like Florida's toll roads, we currently treat that as a > >separate network, so a route relation tagged as network=US:FL:Toll, > >ref=528 would get the toll shield.

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

* Richard Weait [2012-04-04 01:09 -0400]: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Phil! Gold wrote: > > * Chris Lawrence [2012-04-03 10:21 -0400]: > >> http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=14&lat=37.13887&lon=-80.34525&layers=B0 > >> http://elrond.aperiodi

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

way it looks now. Most of the map still has to rerender (and I'm focusing the server on putting Interstates on the low zoom levels at the moment), but the areas around those links should be up to date. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

' admin_level so data consumers don't have to know about every possible network value in every jurisdiction--and eventually I'll get around to writing up a proposal if no one beats me to it. -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

* Nathan Edgars II [2012-04-03 13:36 -0400]: > On 4/3/2012 12:52 PM, Phil! Gold wrote: > >Point taken. They will appear on our particular rendering if the locals > >choose to change the tagging. > > So you'll include network=US:US ref=17 Truck as acceptable tagging?

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

after I started working on the highway shields when I went hiking along part of the Northern Central Railroad Trail and saw that not only was it part of the East Coast Greenway, the East Coast Greenway had its own marker shield.) -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/ph

Re: [Talk-us] Highway Shield Rendering

* Nathan Edgars II [2012-04-03 11:44 -0400]: > On 4/3/2012 11:19 AM, Phil! Gold wrote: > >A lot of those still don't render because they duplicate the > >subnetwork in the ref tag, so Loop 5 (picking an arbitrary number) might > >be represented as network=US:TX:LOOP, re

  1   2   >