On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 10:48:36 PM, G. Cowling, SRNA wrote:
> Actually, it works in some versions of Eudora, but not in others. It
> worked perfectly in all versions of Eudora Lite that I am aware of,
> but does not seem to integrate as well into 4.2 and later versions of
> Eudora P
Actually, it works in some versions of Eudora, but not in others. It
worked perfectly in all versions of Eudora Lite that I am aware of,
but does not seem to integrate as well into 4.2 and later versions of
Eudora Pro.
--
--
View
Hi Alexander,
> Okay, can you MIME-attach one of these offending messages
> and let us see what's the matter with it?
Here is one...(attached)
Thanks
--
Best regards,
Mike Harlos
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
--
-
Hello Nick,
TB! 1.38e
PGP 6.5.2i
PGPkeys runs from any dir od disk (i mean, that path is OK)
Selecting menu Tools-PGP-Key Manager reports error "Unable to locate
the PGPkeys application"
And one more thing. When trying to use menu
Tools-PGP-Preferences-Files it shows blank fields of placement o
On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 7:18:36 PM, Nick Andriash wrote:
> Preferences set that way... so I tried it, and in fact it does not work in
> TB. This feature of PGP does however, work in Eudora and Outlook 2K.
Whoops!! Let me further qualify that... it does NOT work in Eudora, only in
Outlook
Hi Steve,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 2:44:01 PM, you wrote:
> Exactly. More is better. Separate parts is better. Monolithic is bad.
> Why?
> Choice. :)
To some degree you are most certainly correct, but I think it depends
on the task. For example, if the only time you ever do a
Hello Batters,
I'm wondering if any of you who use PGP, and have set the Preferences for
auto verification on opening of messages, has ever had it work for them? The
question was posed to me off List, and I must admit that I didn't have my
Preferences set that way... so I tried it, and in fact it
On Thursday, January 13, 2000 at 15:52:40 ,Nick scribbled:
>> That they put the mailto: in the template at all, IMHO, is a good thing.
NA> Not sure what you mean by that Angel... do you mean they have a specific
NA> Macro that will automatically put in a "MailTo:" in a signature?
What I meant wa
On Friday 14 January 2000 Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> ... the quickest way of finding such a message given the above
> stipulations about "In-Reply-To" etc. (provided that it resides in the
> same folder) is to press Alt-1 - thread by reference. Of course, if
> it's in another folder,
Hi John,
On 14 January 2000 at 01:21:34 GMT + (which was 01:21 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
JS> What I'd *really* like to be able to do, is from a message I have
JS> in some folder somewhere (which does have valid In-Reply-To: and
JS> References: header
When I search for messages, I can click Follow on the results to
locate the message in my folder hierarchy.
On a given message, if I have replied to it, I can find that reply
(Right Click->Specials->Open Reply).
What I'd *really* like to be able to do, is from a message I have in
some folder so
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:49:08 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 14, 2000, 1:49:08 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> Thursday, January 13, 2000, 10:25:48 AM, tracer wrote:
>> Ok, Stefan... a minor cosmetic bug (g)
Steve> V, not F. Of co
Hi mharlos,
On 13 January 2000 at 14:33:07 GMT -0600 (which was 20:33 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
m> If I save such attachments to and look at them with an editor they
m> are readable, and appear to be simple text files.
If these saved files have message he
On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:15:03 AM, Angel wrote:
> That they put the mailto: in the template at all, IMHO, is a good thing.
Not sure what you mean by that Angel... do you mean they have a specific
Macro that will automatically put in a "MailTo:" in a signature?
Nick
--
-=Nick Andrias
Hello Oliver,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 10:35:09 AM, you wrote:
> Hello The Bat! developers,
> The bug description:
> Messages saved but not set to "send later" can't be deleted from
> Outbox.
This has been discussed before, and it turns out it isn't a bug
exactly. When you
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 2:48:18 PM, Allie wrote:
> I think the deviation from your more ideal
> paradigm is based on the fact that most windows based editors don't
> provide advanced e-mail type editing functions especially with respect to
> quoting. Also, an integrated editor, perhaps wo
Hello,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 6:23:49 AM, you wrote:
> What do you think now?
I think that it sounds extremely difficult to create a universal hook.
There are so many conditions and variations that trying to learn how
to configure the hook will be harder than just learning the "new"
edi
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:36:19 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I wanted to take these two sentences, isolate them, and then have
> people read them together as this is the main thrust of my argument.
> It is because they are all shipping basic editors people are
> constantly asking for more fea
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 2:38:10 PM, Januk wrote:
> As many as are out there, until you find something that does *exactly*
> what you need. I installed heaps of software when I upgraded my
> computer, simply because I didn't know what would work best.
Exactly. More is better. Separate pa
Hello tracer,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 3:14:13 AM, you wrote:
> IrfanView is quite nice but, how many viewers, editors etc does one
> need to have installed???
As many as are out there, until you find something that does *exactly*
what you need. I installed heaps of software when I upgrad
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> SL>> ... Explain. Might you actually be doing some
> filtering on server side?
> > Not really on server side, just between server and TB!.
>
> Again, explain.
>
Just a small relay program which filters SMTP/POP messages.
It was created to remove (or m
E-mail Document
Prepared by Ethan J. Mings on: 1/13/2000 at 5:23 PM.
-
Just a short note to thanks the individual who provided assistance
today when I lost all of my e-mail files and address book. Through
the helpful tip of copying certain folders back into the mail fold
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1:11:27 PM, Alex wrote:
SL>> ... Explain. Might you actually be doing some filtering on server side?
> Not really on server side, just between server and TB!.
Again, explain.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 12:38:05 PM, Allie wrote:
> Most windows based editors for these application types are quite basic and
> remarkably consistent in how they function.
[snip-o-rama]
[portion about all applications shipping robust editors]
> It would be *then*, that people would be shout
Hi there!
On 13 Jan 00, at 14:33, mharlos wrote
about "Unable to read "untitled.msg" attachments":
> The hospital messages show up as an attachment "untitled.msg",
> which I can usually double-click and view in the Bat!. However,
> occasionally the message appears blank, and the size indic
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 12:19:13 PM, Roel wrote:
> sorry, i meant control-f4, *not* shift-f4
Wow, never knew that was there. Would be better to have that as a
pulldown on the button than in the "special" menu.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm yo
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 12:03:54 PM, Alexander wrote:
> ... but right now the only e-mail client that it the way you (and me;-))
> consider optimal is Pegasus AFAIK;-)
PMMail, Pine, Mutt
> OTOH, I do not think this extra "which address would you use?" dialogue is a
> elegant deceision a
Hello Steve,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 8:49:59 PM, you wrote:
SL> Thursday, January 13, 2000, 10:34:43 AM, Alex wrote:
SL>>> This is your choice and does not invalidate the fact that messages, as
SL>>> they come in, do have those headers and thus that letter.
>> Sorry, but it does mean!
Hi,
I'm afraid I keep switching between TB! and another email client
due to a problem I have viewing attachments in TB! (see
description below).
I keep coming back to TB!, however, as I love the fact that I
can be virtually always learning about its vast list of
features.
Here is the situa
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:17:33 +0100, Roel wrote:
[..snip..]
> if you want to reply to the 'from'-address, use shift-f4...
Ooops! That should be CTRL-F4. Shift-F4 replies to the reply-to
address but without a message body.
> only 'drawback' (i think it's a feature actually!) is that you'll n
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:43:20 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
> Let's cut to the chase, shall we? On Winfiles I counted a good ~70 email
> clients of various capacities and ~50 programs dealing with news. Let's
> figure 20 of those email programs aren't really clients and a good 30 of t
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1:03:54 PM, Alexander wrote:
>> When hitting reply and the FROM differs from REPLY-TO the client should
>> ask which address to send to. I know that RFC822 states that REPLY-TO should
>> be used over FROM in cases like this. In fact,
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Alexander,
AVK> OTOH, I do not think this extra "which address would you use?" dialogue is a
AVK> elegant deceision at all (you might believe me
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Alexander,
AVK> OTOH, I do not think this extra "which address would you use?" dialogue is a
AVK> elegant deceision at all (you might believe m
Hi there!
On 13 Jan 00, at 9:50, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Replt-To in mailing list":
> Personally this is a small nigglet, IMHO, with TB!. There have been tons
> of arguments over whether or not mailing lists should set "Reply-To" or not.
> I am a proponent of the mailing-lists setting i
Hi,
Thanks very much for the help...
> Please, export the following parts of your registry and send
> the contents here so we can diagnose the problem (run
> regedit.exe, find the key you want to export, then use
> Registry|Export menu item):
>
> HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\.doc
Here is
Hello The Bat! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.38e
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2128
and would like to report a bug
The bug description:
Messages saved but not set to "send later" can't be deleted from
Outbox.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
Create a new m
Hello,
Claudius>> I don't think any other expression is more exact -- is simply fascistic.
I want to apologize for saying that.
Nevertheless, the last two reactions were very dissapointing. And it's
not forgot with one mail.
--
Claudius Regn
--
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 10:25:48 AM, tracer wrote:
> Ok, Stefan... a minor cosmetic bug (g)
V, not F. Of course my rendering of my name in Esperanto is Stefan so I
guess I can live with it. ;)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ:
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 10:34:43 AM, Alex wrote:
SL>> This is your choice and does not invalidate the fact that messages, as
SL>> they come in, do have those headers and thus that letter.
> Sorry, but it does mean! All header are removed before message comes
> to TB.
... Explain. M
Hello The Desk,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:10:34 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 14, 2000, 1:10:34 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
The Desk wrote:
The> E-mail Document
The> Prepared by Ethan J. Mings on: 1/13/2000 at 1:09 PM
The> ---
The> In answer to the question.
The> The progr
Hello Steve,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 7:52:29 PM, you wrote:
>> Not really. I do remove all "Received:" fields (and others like
>> "X-List-Command:", "X-MSMail-Priority:", "X-Resent-To:", etc.) from my
>> mail, because it takes too much space (sometimes more that half of
>> message
Hi Nick,
...
> However, what about us that are not comfortable with
> some of the Unix style editors you mention. I'm not sure of the terminology,
> but what I'm getting at is... what "good" editor do you know of that will
> have a decent GUI to make it easy for us less technical people to use?
Hi Claudius,
...
> I don't think any other expression is more exact -- is simply fascistic.
Please stop this now IMMEDIATELY - enough is enough.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists
Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 95 4.0 Build B
in Darmstadt, Germany,
on a 1
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:56:09 AM, Urban wrote:
JA>> When you say automate, what exactly do you mean?
> I want to filter the messages without having to download them first.
That requires a bit of skullduggery with POP. With true IMAP it is a snap.
--
Steve C. Lamb
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:37:33 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 14, 2000, 12:37:33 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:14:17 AM, tracer wrote:
>> Ok, maybe you can explain it, whats the use of a different colour
>
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:57:38 AM, Januk wrote:
> Just to note, I'm reading this using Netscape Communicator under Unix at
> University, and only the address using mailto: is recognized. Just adding to
> list of annoying e-mail clients. :)
Well, what do you expect from a web browser?
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:35:58 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 14, 2000, 12:35:58 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:08:40 AM, tracer wrote:
>> didnt have..). Ok, I had the write the things but it made life so m
Hello Nick Andriash,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:01:36 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 14, 2000, 12:01:36 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Nick Andriash wrote:
Nick> On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 8:43:20 AM, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Exactly. TB! is an email client, not an editor.
E-mail Document
Prepared by Ethan J. Mings on: 1/13/2000 at 1:09 PM
---
In answer to the question.
The program is located at f:/program files/thebat
The old "mail folder" is located at f:/batrecovery
Hope that helps.
---
Ethan J. Mings, Principal
The Desk... Solutions for Strategic Questi
Hello Januk,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1:43:41 AM, you wrote:
JA> When you say automate, what exactly do you mean?
I want to filter the messages without having to download them first.
--
Best regards,
Urban
--
--
View the
Steve Lamb wrote:
> So requiring, for example, me to write [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Just to note, I'm reading this using Netscape Communicator under Unix at
University, and only the address using mailto: is recognized. Just adding to
list of annoying e-mail clients.
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:29:02 AM, Alex wrote:
> Not really. I do remove all "Received:" fields (and others like
> "X-List-Command:", "X-MSMail-Priority:", "X-Resent-To:", etc.) from my
> mail, because it takes too much space (sometimes more that half of
> message). So it will not
Hi there!
On 13 Jan 00, at 17:15, Alex Sanyukovitch wrote
about "Re[2]: suggestion- / wish-list":
> AVK> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> AVK> Lines: 51
> AVK> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Just wonder why you ALWAYS have this filed doubled?
Some server on the route adds another one. W
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:15:03 AM, Angel wrote:
> maling lists et al. because of the reason stated above: hitting Reply or
> Reply-To for a "private" reply would send it to the entire list.
Personally this is a small nigglet, IMHO, with TB!. There have been tons
of arguments over whethe
Hello Claudius Regn,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:47:58 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 11:47:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Claudius Regn wrote:
Claudius> Hello Angel,
A>> Forgive me Claudius, but your response does not help the situation. You should've
done with
A>
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:14:17 AM, tracer wrote:
> Ok, maybe you can explain it, whats the use of a different colour
> scheme where you cannot see the colours???
> And why is it called High colour if it hasnt got any (g)
No clue. It changed with the new icon set some company designed fo
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:08:40 AM, tracer wrote:
> didnt have..). Ok, I had the write the things but it made life so much
> easier to create standards(g)
Oh, standards are a good thing, as long as they are open. Microsoft often
doesn't open its standards, doesn't maintain the standards
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:01:36 AM, Nick wrote:
> Good post Steve... I'm finally beginning to see your point on using an
> external editor. :o) However, what about us that are not comfortable with
> some of the Unix style editors you mention.
Which is perfectly understandable. Until I t
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:43:20 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 11:43:20 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> I think that scripting is not a panacea because as any interpreter it is not
>> much of efficiency by the definition. I prefer
Hello Markus,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 7:07:39 PM, you wrote:
>>> Anotherworkaround--justsearchforstringlike
>>> "sdafadfkldjakladjfkdjfklsfjkljlasfjslfd" which should NOT present in
>>> message ;-))
MG> On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 5:48:38 PM, Steve Lamb wrote
Hello Steve,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 6:18:23 PM, you wrote:
SL> Acrually e is better. @ relies on the presence of an email address which
SL> may not always be the case. However, all messages will have some common
SL> headers in them. One of them is a Received header from each SMTP se
Hallo Nick,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:01:36 -0800 GMT (14.01.2000, 01:01 +0800 GMT),
Nick Andriash wrote:
>> Exactly. TB! is an email client, not an editor. They should be
>> concentrating on the email client and its interface, not on an editor.
NA> Good post Steve... I'm finally beginning t
On Wednesday, January 12, 2000 at 21:30:37 ,Keith scribbled:
KR> But, Angel, you don't have either in this message, either!
ACK! LOL
Thanks for pointing that out, I've put it back in. I used it a long time ago but
I took it out. (Temporary brain fart moment on my part maybe? LOL)
If someone wante
Hello tracer,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:39:02 +0700 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 11:39:02 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
tracer wrote:
There are a lot of BETTER methods -- OLE,
AVK>>> No, don't say OLE is better a method;-) Do you *really* think so???
Alex>> I *
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:20:01 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 11:20:01 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1:03:00 AM, Alex wrote:
Alex So why don't you edit glyphs file?
t>>> Because if I cannot s
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:18:23 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 11:18:23 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Better way - use @ character and search for it in the message headers.
>> 100% guaranteed.
Steve> Acrually e is better.
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 07:16:11 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 10:16:11 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> As for Microsoft, we all know they "won" on PR alone. Thing is, after a
Steve> while, people get tired of the BS and
Hello The Desk,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:17:00 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 11:17:00 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
The Desk wrote:
The> Hello TBUDL,
The> I need some help.
The> My bat program ran into real problems.
The> The mail folder is on another direct
Hi,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 6:49:35 AM, Alex wrote:
>> Anotherworkaround--justsearchforstringlike
>> "sdafadfkldjakladjfkdjfklsfjkljlasfjslfd" which should NOT present in
>> message ;-))
On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 5:48:38 PM, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Whoa, t
On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 8:43:20 AM, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Exactly. TB! is an email client, not an editor. They should be
> concentrating on the email client and its interface, not on an editor.
Good post Steve... I'm finally beginning to see your point on using an
external editor. :o)
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 7:37:38 AM, Nick wrote:
> I agree with you to some extent Steve, but I find your response puzzling, as
> you seem to be one that strongly professes the use of Internet Standards.
Yup.
> In researching the subject a little, I find that RFC 2368 (at least my
> under
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 6:49:35 AM, Alex wrote:
> Anotherworkaround--justsearchforstringlike
> "sdafadfkldjakladjfkdjfklsfjkljlasfjslfd" which should NOT present in
> message ;-))
Whoa, there it is. :P
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I
Hello Angel,
A> Forgive me Claudius, but your response does not help the situation. You should've
done with
A> this what I did..*take it into private*.
Angel, I will not continue the discussion about the topic beyond this
mail. But I think Steve's first email needed to be answered in this list.
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 2:30:03 AM, Marck wrote:
> Anyway - where does it stop? ActiveX? ShockWave? CGI? JavaScript?
> VBScript? All perfectly valid HTML and transmittable in a mail
> document like any image. Let browsers browse and let MUA manage mail.
> KISS.
> [good heavens,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1:26:27 AM, Oleg wrote:
> Because it's an argument for a single tool: TheBat! for all tasks
> regarding mail management.
^^
Spell checking and editing don't fall under management.
> It has nothing to do with the problem we are discuss
Hello Alex Sanyukovitch,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:15:41 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 10:15:41 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alex Sanyukovitch wrote:
>>> There are a lot of BETTER methods -- OLE,
AVK>> No, don't say OLE is better a method;-) Do you *really* t
Hello Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 15:47:09 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:47:09 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote:
Clemens> well the second thing is ... I was puzzled WHY it was SO big ... I
Clemens> o
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:37:07 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:37:07 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
>> so I can see only one reason for RITLabs programmers to support DDE in The
>> Bat! -- in Delphi DDE wa
Hello Sashka,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:11:44 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:11:44 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Sashka wrote:
Sashka> Hello,
S>>> how about button somewhere in message viewer, pressing on which will
S>>> download pictures for current html e-mail?
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1:03:00 AM, Alex wrote:
Alex>>> So why don't you edit glyphs file?
t>> Because if I cannot see it properly others cannot either.
> Wow... great logic ;-) There is no problem here!
Are you using the high or low color version? The low color version has
very distinct
Wednesday, January 12, 2000, 11:38:40 PM, Andrew wrote:
JA>> Well it depends on my needs, right? If I want to filter all mail from
JA>> one folder to one other folder, then I can just do one common string.
JA>> For example I could search for the letter e, anywhere in the message.
JA>> I'm 99.999%
Hello TBUDL,
I need some help.
My bat program ran into real problems.
The mail folder is on another directory.
The program is located on another drive.
The progam will not recognize the mail folder and I cannot get to my
800+ messages.
Any advice would be helpful.
Help!
--
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1:54:16 AM, Andrew wrote:
> The other thing you learn from him is why Unix got stomped all over by
> Microsoft products. Steve has a pure Unix mindset: there is One Right
> Way to understand anything, and anyone who can't share it, even after
> being shouted at, is a St
Hello Alexander,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 4:37:07 PM, you wrote:
AVK> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
AVK> Lines: 51
AVK> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Just wonder why you ALWAYS have this filed doubled?
AVK> Finally, who told you DDE is obsolete? M$? Half of OS/2 is based on DDE,
AVK> and
On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 1:08:01 AM, Alex Sanyukovitch wrote:
> Hello Alexander,
> Thursday, January 13, 2000, 6:03:19 AM, you wrote:
AAG>> Master, may be U know why PGPkeys doesn't run, inspite of correct
AAG>> path etc ? :-)
> Sorry, I do not use PGP, so I can't help you :-((
What,
On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 12:29:05 AM, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Those that don't have C&P if needed. I fail to see why we should mangle
> our sigs for the inadequacies of another client.
I agree with you to some extent Steve, but I find your response puzzling, as
you seem to be one that str
Hello Andrew,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 9:38:40 AM, you wrote:
JA>> Well it depends on my needs, right? If I want to filter all mail from
JA>> one folder to one other folder, then I can just do one common string.
JA>> For example I could search for the letter e, anywhere in the message.
JA>>
Hello tracer,
Thursday, January 13, 2000, 4:13:38 AM, tracer wrote:
Clemens>> First, I today, reapaired it myself. I just renamed that file to the
Clemens>> message file and voila I have my inbox back.
> You are lucky and I would recommend creating some folders and split
> that mail up..
> I kno
Hi there!
On 12 Jan 00, at 18:29, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: suggestion- / wish-list":
> > I believe it's normal, if you don't think so, it's your problem.
> > Furthermore, if your favourite vim doesn't support DDE, it's another *your*
> > problem (and problem of other vim users under Windo
Hi there!
On 13 Jan 00, at 11:37, Alex Sanyukovitch wrote
about "Re[2]: suggestion- / wish-list":
> AVK> DDE is the only *effective* protocol IMO existing under windoze that allows
> AVK> dirrect applications transactions. It really *works*...
>
> DDE is an obsolete protocol brought fro
Hi there!
On 13 Jan 00, at 18:20, tracer wrote
about "Re[3]: suggestion- / wish-list":
> AVK>> DDE is the only *effective* protocol IMO existing under windoze that allows
> AVK>> dirrect applications transactions. It really *works*...
>
> Alex> DDE is an obsolete protocol brought from W
Hi there!
On 12 Jan 00, at 23:13, Andrew K. Lovetski wrote
about "Re: suggestion- / wish-list":
> Oh, just another idea how TB could see if the editing was over: many
> editors open the file exclusively and do not allow to open it for
> editing in other programs (MS Word, for example) or del
Hello, The Bat Users!
JA> is there any way to override the HTML viewer that The Bat! has so
JA> that I use a dedicated HTML viewer? I am thinking of something
JA> similar to how the image viewer works right now. The one that
JA> comes with The Bat! is not very good, but there is an option to
Hello, The Bat Users!
m> I prefer to use WordView rather than Word for viewing word
m> processor attachments, to avoid execution of potentially malicious
m> macro code.
m> In spite of *.doc files being associated with WordView, The Bat!
m> insists on opening MS Word to view these files when at
Hello, The Bat Users!
CGS> First, I today, reapaired it myself. I just renamed that file to
CGS> the message file and voila I have my inbox back.
CGS> btw, the .tmp file had the size of 54 MB ...
Seems you do not use Compress folder on a regular basis (and all mail
you ever received is still in
Hello, The Bat Users!
>> You would have to create a filter with strings for each
>> person in that folder.
JA> Well it depends on my needs, right? If I want to filter all mail from
JA> one folder to one other folder, then I can just do one common string.
JA> For example I could search f
In Reference to "Grid Index Out of Range" From Nancy:
N> It happens in all folders, usually but not always when there are a lot
N> of messages in the folder and usually, but not always when it is a
N> thread. It's that "not always" that makes it so weird to me. There is
N> no absolute consistenc
It happens in all folders, usually but not always when there are a lot
of messages in the folder and usually, but not always when it is a
thread. It's that "not always" that makes it so weird to me. There is
no absolute consistency to the problem that I can see.
--
Nancy [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
On Thursday, January 13, 2000, 3:11:44 PM, Sashka wrote:
> I _DON'T WANT TO OPEN NEW WINDOW_ in browser. and not always new
> window is used,when I'm using IE.
PLEASE DON'T SHOUT. Besides, ever since IE 5.01 I get a new window
when I open a URL.
Regards,
Markus
Using The Bat! 1.39 Beta/1
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
