Hello Terry,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 1:30:26 PM, Terry G. Munson wrote:
TGM> I think "follow up" would be "references" in version 2.00.
I think you are correct, so my earlier post was incorrect. Whatever!
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2
Hello subscriber2list,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:19:55 PM, subscriber2list wrote:
s> I too am perfectly happy (within reason, that is
s> In time I will more than likely "take the plunge", but I'm wondering
s> how does RIT price all these upgrades? What I mean is ... every time
s> there is a ne
Hello subscriber2list,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:19:55 PM, subscriber2list wrote:
s> I
s> liked Greg's description of "how-to" and thought it a great function.
s> He didn't chime in when I asked the initial question, so either he
s> is/wa very busy and didn't see it or thought "Hey, I don't wan
Hello Leif,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 5:20:26 PM, you wrote:
LG> Hello subscriber2list,
LG> You're toast bud!!! :grin:
LOL!
--
Best regards,
subscriber2list
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com
Hello subscriber2list,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:16:06 PM, you wrote:
subscriber2list> Aaaah, gsh! Do you think "Lief" is gonna git me?
subscriber2list> My fast fat fingers misspelled his name ... shame on
subscriber2list> me, shame on me, shame on me. Sorry, Leif ... I hope
subscriber2list>
Hello Mary,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 4:44:19 PM, you wrote:
s>> Oh, sounds like me ... we could be the "dynamic duo" that Marck,
s>> Lief, et al wonder "Why are they using The Bat!" Just kidding, guys
s>> (and gals)!
Aaaah, gsh! Do you think "Lief" is gonna git me? My fast fat
fing
Hello Mary,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 4:22:55 PM, you wrote:
MB> Hello subscriber2list!
MB> On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:09 PM, you wrote:
TGM>>> Only if you were born before 1960. ;-)
s>> LOL! Yup ... way back ... push 'em back ... well, may be not that far
s>> back .. 1945 or there abouts
Hello subscriber2list!
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:30 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Sorry about the ambiguous construction ...
s> I don't think you were ambiguous ... I just always like to confirm
s> "what I think I've read" ... possibly a bad habit on my part.
I myself regard it as a very *good* habi
Hello Mary,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:47:57 PM, you wrote:
MB> Sorry about the ambiguous construction of my sentence in the post
MB> you're replying to, where I said, "It's free." :) Upgrading from
MB> v.2.00.x to any subsequent version is definitely free. Including
MB> to the latest (curren
Hello subscriber2list!
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 3:09 PM, you wrote:
TGM>> Only if you were born before 1960. ;-)
s> LOL! Yup ... way back ... push 'em back ... well, may be not that far
s> back .. 1945 or there abouts ...
You delightful young puppy! (Have you tried View Threads by Referenc
Howdy Ben,
BA> The only time i had to pay to upgrade was when the bat went from 1.xx
BA> to 2.xx. All the other times i have upgrade it has been free... it
BA> will be for you too. If you upgrade from 2.00.x to 2.11.x or even
BA> 2.12.x it is FREE. no charge. Ritlabs dont charge f
Hello subscriber2list,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 4:49:55 PM, you wrote:
s> Well, good for you! I too am perfectly happy (within reason, that is
s> In time I will more than likely "take the plunge", but I'm wondering
s> how does RIT price all these upgrades? What I mean is ... every time
s> the
Hello Terry,
>> Unless I "hear" differently young man (assuming you're younger than
>> I) ... thanks a bunch!
TGM> Only if you were born before 1960. ;-)
LOL! Yup ... way back ... push 'em back ... well, may be not that far
back .. 1945 or there abouts ...
--
Best regards,
subscriber2list
Hello subscriber2list!
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:19 PM, you wrote:
s> In time I will more than likely "take the plunge", but I'm wondering
s> how does RIT price all these upgrades? What I mean is ... every time
s> there is a new release, does one have to pay for the upgrade? It
s> would se
Hello subscriber2list,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 12:42:32 PM, you wrote:
> Unless I "hear" differently young man (assuming you're younger than
> I) ... thanks a bunch!
Only if you were born before 1960. ;-)
--
Thanks,
Terry
Using the Bat! 2.11.02
under Windows XP Service Pack 1 2600
__
Hello Terry,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:30:26 PM, you wrote:
TGM> Hello subscriber2list,
TGM> Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 10:54:48 AM, you wrote:
>> Again, not available to click on.
TGM> I think "follow up" would be "references" in version 2.00.
I think you're right-on based upon the earlier
Howdy subscriber2list,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 8:19:55 PM, subscriber2list wrotened:
subscriber2list> Well, I guess I should have been over on the tbot
subscriber2list> thread, huh?
You were asking a question about how to use the bat.. Seemed on topic
for this list.
subscriber2list> ho
Hello Mary,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 2:09:26 PM, you wrote:
MB> Hello subscriber2list!
MB> On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 12:54 PM, you wrote:
S Then I displayed the View option menu of the message itself and no
S "Follow-up" menu selection was offered
MB> Now that you've been through a
Hello Cyrille,
>> No "Follow-up" possibility was in the context menu of possibilities.
>> Nor do I quite understand the "show and hide" reference, but suspect
>> that is applicable to the newer version releases. I am using an older
>> version of The Bat!, Version 2.0.0
>> Oh well ... Cyrille,
Hello Subscriber2list,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 7:54:48 PM, you wrote:
C>> 3) The context menu which opens gives you the possibilities to show
C>>(and to hide) 12 different headers. Among them you find also the
C>>'Follow-up' header.
> No "Follow-up" possibility was in the context menu
Hello subscriber2list,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 10:54:48 AM, you wrote:
> Again, not available to click on.
I think "follow up" would be "references" in version 2.00.
--
Thanks,
Terry
Using the Bat! 2.00
under Windows XP Service Pack 1 2600
Hello subscriber2list!
On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 12:54 PM, you wrote:
S>>> Then I displayed the View option menu of the message itself and no
S>>> "Follow-up" menu selection was offered
Now that you've been through all the trial-and-error possibilities,
I'll chime in with my experience. When
Hello Adam,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 10:57:09 AM, you wrote:
A> Hello subscriber2list,
A> Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 7:47:21 PM, you wrote:
s>> I hit Reply to create a reply message and actually changed the subject
s>> field to read "This is only a test ...".
s>> Then I displayed the View optio
Hello Cyrille,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 5:19:14 AM, you wrote:
C> Hello Subscriber2list,
C> Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 12:17:21 AM, you wrote:
>> Then I displayed the View option menu of the message itself and no
>> "Follow-up" menu selection was offered. Oh well ... not a biggy to me
>> as I
Hello subscriber2list,
Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 7:47:21 PM, you wrote:
s> I hit Reply to create a reply message and actually changed the subject
s> field to read "This is only a test ...".
s> Then I displayed the View option menu of the message itself and no
s> "Follow-up" menu selection was off
Hello Subscriber2list,
Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 12:17:21 AM, you wrote:
> Then I displayed the View option menu of the message itself and no
> "Follow-up" menu selection was offered. Oh well ... not a biggy to me
> as I can always just create a new message with new subject field
> content, but
Thanks Adam for your reply.
Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 3:23:45 PM, you wrote:
s>> I may be missing something here, but I tried the steps you enumerated
s>> and when I got to step #2, under View menu option, I found no
s>> Follow-up menu selection. Now I'm using an older version of The Bat!,
s>> V 2
Hello subscriber2list,
Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 3:19:01 PM, you wrote:
GS>> Walla now they have a reply changing the subject that starts a new
GS>> thread. Common courtesy I think.
GS>> Just like I've done with this message.
s> I may be missing something here, but I tried the steps you enumerat
Hello Greg,
Sunday, June 27, 2004, 1:08:30 AM, you wrote:
GS> All they have to do when subject is changed in a reply is the
GS> following: 1 change subject
GS> 2 select View | Follow-up
GS> 3 delete message id
GS> Walla now they have a reply changing the subject that starts a new
GS> thr
Hello Melissa,
Saturday, June 26, 2004, 1:41:16 PM, Melissa Reese wrote:
MR> Some of us just don't have either the time or the inclination to read
MR> every single message that comes into every list we subscribe to. For
MR> this reason - amongst others - we use threading as a means to quickly
MR>
30 matches
Mail list logo
