I propoase the theory:
"PopFile is the only fully-configurable and adjustable spam filtering system
that works properly with TB"
Discuss please...
Background:
I have now tried all the various options - having become concerned about
PopFile producing endless Sql zero byte files in my temp folder
Hallo Ron,
On Friday, September 24, 1999, 9:18:56 PM, Ron wrote:
>> This was true perhaps 6-8 months ago. I don't know what kind of spam you
>> are getting, but mine is addressed to me (well, 95 mails out of 100).
R> Yes, I'm getting a lot more spam addressed to me individually
R> rece
Hi,
PG>> Tuesday, October 12, 1999, 8:34:14 AM : - n messages refiltered to
PG>> stkilda\tbudl - m messages refiltered to douance\faq etc.
> I absolutely support this idea. I often get the info "x messages"
> refiltered" but don't know w
there isn't a way and if
> there is, to determine how to do that.
I don't see how you could avoid doing this manually, i.e., going
through the filters and making them manual only or neither active nor
manual only, as you need to.
--
* Ali Martin mailto:[EMAIL PR
messages? If not... it's still a
good idea - I'd like to see it implimented! (if it's not
already, I don't think it is...) Quota-activated filters
would be useful.
> A ticker would be useful to the degree it could be
> activated and deactivated easily, and wou
On Friday, November 26, 1999, Douglas Hinds wrote:
>>> In any case, I see a need for activating a given filter without
>>> having to activate all filters for a given folder at once, as seems
>>> to be the case at present.
AM>> I don't see how you could avo
Hi there!
On 26 Nov 99, at 14:48, Paula Ford wrote
about "Re: Activating only certain filters":
> The focus of TB's filtering is ostensibly on the status of
> the message, not the folder. So, we have rules that apply to
> Incoming Mail, Outgoing Mail, Read Messages
er messages from his InBox incrementally for which TB
would have to allow users to invoke filters from a list of all filters.
For the most part, though, TB's filtering is fine.
--
Paula Ford
The Bat! 1.36 (reg)
Windows 95 4.0 Build 950
--
---
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> Every time, TB! asks us which filter sets we want to filter*, and we
> choose all of them except manual filters only. TB! then filters all
> messages (read or unread) properly.
> So what is my confusion, you might ask. Well, why are people saying
>
o
> be filtered.
I just now created an incoming filter for a sender who's messages are
normally filtered to a non-specific folder but not the Inbox. I then
re-filtered this folder using the Incoming filter set *without*
selecting read or unread message filters and the messages were
filtere
Hi there!
On 27 Nov 99, at 15:04, Paula Ford wrote
about "Re: Activating only certain filters":
> > This filtering structure can be _partially_ mimicked with TB, but not
> > in its entirety:-( OTOH, it proved to be very useful for me, hence
> > I'll probably
On Sunday, November 28, 1999, Ali Martin wrote:
> My interpretation is that the Incoming filter set is a list of
> filters that will work on all message types and on any folder, it
> would appear.
You are correct and I apologize for the misinformation. At one point,
back when I fir
ot;Folder /
> Re-filter", the "rule set to apply", and then manual only.
No. Manual only rules will always take effect during re-filter
operations.
The active only filters will work as well in this setting. The filters
with 'manual only' checked will *not* work automatica
On Sunday, November 28, 1999, Douglas Hinds wrote:
> Finally (I am pissed off at this point), I make the rule active *and*
> manual only and boom. It works. For all practical purposes then, *only
> active filters filter*, and they can be manual or not manual.
Your confusion stems f
you see:-)
Yes, Pegasus allows you to create filter sets which may be assigned on
a per folder basis and be made to be applied when the folder either is
opened or closed. Each folder may then have two separate sets of
filters assigned to it, ie, one to be run on opening and one to be run
on closing
Douglas Hinds wrote:
> Sunday, November 28, 1999, 3:59:02 PM, Alexander wrote what follows
> below (reformatted) and I would like him to explain why the filtering
> he describes in relation to the messages he receives (all of which is
> close to what I have in mind, particularly the filtering
On Sunday, November 28, 1999, Ali Martin wrote:
> Well see if you get my logic:
> a) To get a filter to work *at all*, you have to have the 'active'
>switch checked.
> b) An incoming filter with only the 'active' switch checked, is a
The Incoming Mail
Paula Ford wrote:
> The Incoming Mail filters are confusingly misnamed since they operate
> manually on all messages in the InBox when invoked manually, not just
> "incoming message flows" as the Help describes them.
Agreed.
> Hmmm??? If you click on a folder other t
On Sunday, November 28, 1999, Douglas Hinds wrote:
> True, but that doesn't address the question of whether turning off the
> ticker to the main accounts inbox means that no ticker will be
> available for any of that account's subdirectories.
I tried this out and unread messages in subfolders ap
On Sunday, November 28, 1999, Douglas Hinds wrote:
> I would also like anyone who believes that this *can* be done using TB
> (as Paula suggested), to elucidate on that as well:
> This is exactly what I'd appreciate hearing in greater depth, as well
> as any dissenting opinions.
Dissenting op
e one would need to
implement this part as "Read" type filters. But then I would
*have* to open *each* of the delivery confirmations to get them
filtered where I want them to go to, which isn't the thing I would
like to do... In many cases, it's quite enough to *look* at th
Hi there!
On 29 Nov 99, at 13:32, Douglas Hinds wrote
about "Re[2]: Activating only certain filt":
> Monday, November 29, 1999, 12:13:40 AM, Paula wrote in response to my
> saying in relation to Alex's claim that the filtering system he's
> using in Pegasus is not possible using TB:
>
> PF>
but grey it out.
PF>> Right, thus the option on the re-filter dialog for "Manual filters
PF>> only". Re-filtering without checking that option will invoke all
PF>> active filters, regardless of whether or not the "Manual only"
PF>> option is checked for t
.
Regular expressions can be quite useful in filtering but doesn't
address the type of functionality that you've been querying.
PF>> I believe that Outgoing Mail filters work on all messages sent. All
PF>> messages being sent may actually go through the Outbox. I've never
PF>
Jason Ellis wrote:
> I too am having problems getting my filters in TB to work properly.
> I've managed to get most things filtering OK, but, amazingly, the one
> thing I haven't been able to get to filter at all is this mailing
> list!
> And yes, when I received
Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
> Tuesday, November 30, 1999, Jason Ellis wrote to Ali Martin about
> Activating only certain filters:
JE>> One question - just for my own sanity - what exactly are "Kludges"? It
JE>> sounds like something a plumber might have to deal with ;-)
hing
> else except this one mailing list.
Now that's really strange. :-/ I don't think that suggesting other
ways of creating the filter is the answer.
There's most likely something that you're missing.
What happens to the TBUDL mail then? Do they all remain in the Inbox?
Whe
Jason Ellis wrote:
> It all remains in the inbox, yes.
OK.
> I placed it first, as you suggested.
OK. All this does is to ensure that this filter is applied first so
that if you wish to filter private mail from TBUDL subscribers, you
don't accidentally filter mail from them that's sent to T
Kevin Boylan wrote:
> I'm a little confused from what everyone is saying here. Maybe I missed
> part of the discussion, but for me, just filtering on TBUDL alone in the
> Recipient field works just fine. All messages come in with someones name
> in the recipient field but the email address t
n. :) If the
accounts are kept separate from each other then there's no need for an
accounts column. :) Outlook is more along what you seem to be
suggesting where mail from all accounts is kept in one area, the
argument being, why separate the mail when all accounts belong to the
user.
> Once
ign. ...
Despite Douglas' problems with Calypso, it has a lovely filtering
system. All of what you mentioned is accomplished in a simpler and more
elegant manner. A single filter, for example, can be set to apply to
both incoming and outgoing messages. Filters can run automatically, of
course,
> book in design. ...
> Despite Douglas' problems with Calypso, it has a lovely filtering
> system. All of what you mentioned is accomplished in a simpler and more
> elegant manner. A single filter, for example, can be set to apply to
> both incoming and outgoing messages. Filters
case, your needs seem similar to mine.
Yes, but this applies only to a special fraction of my traffic (the
"technical" messages mostly, i.e. the messages that I just want
to know they exist:-) but needn't read...)
> AVK> In TB this part cannot be implemented, therefore one wou
On Wednesday, December 01, 1999, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> In Pegasus, all the new mail arrives to *one* Inbox (Pegasus
> calls it "New mail folder"), provided that you install the program
> as single-user and use identities under this single user (this is
> how I run Pegasus).
In TB, a u
Hi there!
On 2 Dec 99, at 1:54, Paula Ford wrote
about "Re: Activating only certain filters":
> In TB, a user could filter incoming messages to all other accounts to
> one InBox, if they wished, by creating just one filter on each account,
> then filter them from th
On Thursday, December 02, 1999, Douglas Hinds wrote:
AVK>> :-)))
> What does :-))) represent?
The :-) represents Alexander smiling and the )) represent his double
(triple?) chins.
--
Paula Ford
The Bat! 1.36 (reg)
Windows 95 4.0 Build 950
--
-
Hi there!
On 2 Dec 99, at 21:21, Douglas Hinds wrote
about "Re[2]: Activating only certain filt":
> >> AVK> In TB this part cannot be implemented, therefore one would need
> >> AVK> to implement this part as "Read" type filters. But then I
Hi there!
On 3 Dec 99, at 0:00, Paula Ford wrote
about "Re: Activating only certain filters":
> AVK>> :-)))
>
> > What does :-))) represent?
>
> The :-) represents Alexander smiling and the )) represent his double
> (triple?) chins.
:-o! What a out
Dalnet|Outage - location subject - presence yes
evilday - location sender - presence no
screwyluie - location sender - presence no
Notice I've got two "presence no" in this one. When I drag this filter
into Kill filters, it becomes:
Detect by:
Originator
Signal Strings:
20Dal
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Jason,
JT> Is 01 a "not" parameter for kill filters?
can't help you out on this one... i don't use kill filters...
bu
Hello Roel and Bat Buddies,
> if you have created a filter for incoming mail, that includes
> 'alternatives', try dragging it to the kill-filters...
> only the first will show: the alternatives seem to have vanished...
> if you drag it back to incoming-mail, the alternat
> No it does not!
Excuse me! I mean, "Yes it does!" Rephrased: Alternates do _not_ work
when moved to Kill filters!
Don't blame me for my mistakes...It's rather early in the morning. :)
--
Unequivocally,
Jason Thompson
[EMAIL PROT
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Oliver,
OS> Then I put "\explorer.exe" in the edit
just put 'explorer.exe' or 'explorer' in the field, that'll do it :-)
if you want to use w
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:00:27 +0100, Oliver Sturm wrote:
> I tried to establish a filter for outgoing messages... it should run
> an external program before sending the message. So I created a new
> filter for "Outgoing mail", entered my own mail address together with
> "Sender" as a fil
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:08:25 +0100, Roel wrote:
> just put 'explorer.exe' or 'explorer' in the field, that'll do it :-)
I included my windows directory as well and it also worked.
--
Ali Martin | Using The Bat! v1.38e
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Windows NT 4.0
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 01:39:59 +0100, Oliver Sturm wrote:
AM>> I included my windows directory as well and it also worked.
> It does work. I fell for some nasty translation error... There's a
> check box beneath that edit field saying "Run hidden". I usually use
> The Bat! with german
Hello, The Bat Users!
OS> I tried to establish a filter for outgoing messages... it should
OS> run an external program before sending the message.
No, not before but _after_ sending the message to SMTP server.
OS> --
OS> Oliver Sturm / <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please, use dash-dash-space-CRLF
"Mailing List filters":
>> Steve Lamb wrote:
>> > I prefer to have one regex filter that would catch mailing list mail
>> > and filter it into a folder under the "Mailing Lists" folder using
>> > the name of the mailing list that sent it. That w
Steve wrote:
> Then you don't know regex, do you? Here's the perlized version to catch
> all lists off listar, majordomo and LSERV.
> if (($line =~ m/^X-List: (.*)/) ||
> ($line =~ m/^Sender: owner-(.*)@/) ||
> ($line =~ m/^Sender: (.*)-owner@/)){
> $filter_to = $account/Mailing L
il list traffic out there.
Yes, but is it for the average user easier then just adding filters??
While I donot mind a more elegant/complex setup myself, my experience
sofar with computers is that the easier and simpler and splitup a
suggested route is, the less chance the users end up messing it up
: Mailing List filters":
>> Saturday, January 08, 2000, 12:25:01 PM, Alexander wrote:
>> > You got it right. Just Steve is dreaming aloud, as it's characteristic for him;-)
>>
>> Hey now, I thought it was characteristic of me to bash everything and
>
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:49:56 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 10, 2000, 11:49:56 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> Sunday, January 09, 2000, 10:27:00 PM, tracer wrote:
>> I thought you ran Linux
Steve> I do. My shell is zsh. Bas
Hi!
Allie Martin wrote at 3/24/2000, 1:17 :
AM> On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:47:19 +0100, SyP wrote:
>> Is there any way for filters to work throughout accounts?
AM> Not the way that you're indicating.
Then I guess multiple POP3 mailboxes for one account would do for
m
wade
through all of the e-mail to find the ones that are ignored.
I've read the help files, but there's not much guidance there. Is
this behavior some kind of bug, or is this by design?
I've also noticed that the results from the Selective Download filters
(whether set to kill or i
Hallo Steve,
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:38:15 +0100GMT (30-3-04, 9:38 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
SM> Can anyone confirm this problem or is it more likely to be a problem
SM> with my system?
SM> The right-hand click context menu on a message, specifically RH click
SM> | Specials | Create Filter
Hi Roelof
> For me it created this filter for your message:
> BeginFilter
> Name: Steve Mulhall
> Active: 1
> Source: \\roelof\Inbox
> Target: \\roelof\Steve Mulhall
>
> EndFilter
> Exactly as it should. That's TB 2.04.07 under W98
Must be something specifically with my end then as when I ri
Hi John
> Just for good measure, have you tried to envoke the menu from
> SHIFT+CTL+F and/or the Specials menu?
SHIFT+CTRL+F does nothing either. To be honest I've never used this shortcut
combination but it still does nothing. The 'Special' menu is displayed when you RH
click on a message and
n a message | Specials | Create Filter it doesn't even bring up
> the usual dialog box to create the filter. It actually does nothing at all.
> Guess maybe a re-installation could be the next port of call
Creating filters by RMB as described works fine at home under Win98, and also
here
ON Monday, March 29, 2004, 12:38:31 PM, you wrote:
SM> Must be something specifically with my end then as when I right-hand
SM> click on a message
Hi Steve,
What is meant is that you click to right button on the mouse.
It is up to you to do this left or right handed.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Hi Gerard
> What is meant is that you click to right button on the mouse.
> It is up to you to do this left or right handed.
I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean. What I am trying to do is
what I used to do in previous versions of TB and from what I have read
in terms of replies to this po
etime produces a "Connect Failed" but checking them individually
they are all fine. The other machine (the one I'm using now) that experiences
the problem with creating filters has no other obvious problems.
Any ideas anyone?
--
Cheers
Steve
_
On Thursday, April 15, 2004, Steve Mulhall wrote...
> Hi guys
>> BeginFilter
>> Name: Steve Mulhall
>> Active: 1
>> Source: \\roelof\Inbox
>> Target: \\roelof\Steve Mulhall
>>
>> EndFilter
>> Exactly as it should. That's TB 2.04.07 under W98
> A possible update on this. Have just installed 2
On Thursday, April 15, 2004, 9:55:38 AM, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
>> A possible update on this. Have just installed 2.04.07 on Windows
>> XP Pro and the have the same problem there i.e. right click |
>> specials | create filter, does nothing at all.
> I'm unable to duplicate this issue, but then I
Hi Dwight
> works fine here
Yep, that seems to be the general consensus from everyone on this list
who's replied to this. It would appear that I'm "special" then. Seems
odd that it happens to no one else apart from me and then it happens
on two totally different machines with different operating
ON Friday, April 16, 2004, 7:55:57 AM, you wrote:
SM> Seems
SM> odd that it happens to no one else apart from me and then it happens
SM> on two totally different machines with different operating systems
Hi Steve,
Without putting to fine a point on it, the common factor seems to be you.
If nobo
Hi Gerard
> If nobody has seen this problem and you find the same problem on 2
> different machines with 2 different releases of TB! me guess is it is
> something you do. Problem is I do not know what.
No, no. You misunderstand me. The problem is happening on two
different machines with the same
ON Friday, April 16, 2004, 9:02:11 AM, you wrote:
SM> Having said all that, it appears that I'm the only person using this
SM> version who's having this problem
The good news is version 2.1 is almost here.
I hope that solves your problem.
One thought, could this be the result of a malformed head
Hi Gerard
> The good news is version 2.1 is almost here.
> I hope that solves your problem.
Good stuff. There's nothing like a newer version to help eliminate
certain problems
> One thought, could this be the result of a malformed header in the e-mail?
> Have you tried e-mails from different sou
Steve Mulhall, [SM] wrote:
SM> The right-hand click context menu on a message, specifically RH
SM> click | Specials | Create Filter, doesn't actually do anything, on
SM> any message in any account. I have just upgraded to this latest
SM> build and it worked perfectly in the previous build I had
SM
Hello Joseph,
> 2. The VF setup has a filter dialog. Is that to pull messages
> in? Assuming that it was, I set it up for flagged messages or
> those in a particular color group, but none appeared in the VF,
> even after refreshing it. (And, if it's not to pull in messages,
> what's it for
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:12:30 GMT, MAU wrote:
> did you select any folders to "pull"
> from?
Bingo. Thanks.
--
JN
Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
I have set up several filters in one account. I'd like to move some of
those filters into another account. Rather than copying and
re-entering them, is there a way to move them? If it's easier, I could
copy all of the filters and then delete the ones that I don't need in
the new a
MAU,
Monday, April 26, 2004, 4:37:45 AM, you wrote:
M> Hello Michael,
>> I have set up several filters in one account. I'd like to move some of
>> those filters into another account. Rather than copying and
>> re-entering them, is there a way to move them? If it's
Hello Paul,
On Sun, 30 May 2004, at 08:17:07 [GMT-0400] (which was 05:17:07 In San
Jose, CA, USA) you wrote:
PC> Marck has 2 filters,
I downloaded the filters, got a free account at Spamcop and tried the
send filter. The email I was trying to send to spamcop was deleted.
I have trie
C2>> The filters for setting up virtual folders seem to permit a
C2>> message to reside in only one virtual folder at any one time,
C2>> despite the filter parameters meeting the requirements of several
C2>> virtual folders.
C2>> Any way of getting a message to a
I can't now get rid of; it says there are
parked messages in it, which there are not, that I can
find, but I can't delete it.
Finding RitLab's announcement when I logged in this
morning didn't help ... :-( I'm not sure I want to go
through the whole reinstall thing again, an
Hi TBUDL,
I'm using the same version of TB! at work and at home and in the quest
to keep the two setups roughly equivalent I'd like to be able to
ensure that all the new filters I define at work (where I use email
the most) are also available at home.
I noted there is a file in my T
I'm resubmitting this question that was posed back on May 15, but without
responses:
Hi TBUDL,
I'm using the same version of TB! at work and at home and in the quest
to keep the two setups roughly equivalent I'd like to be able to
ensure that all the new filters I define at wo
Konichiwa, Folks,
I have been used filter for rewriting (via external proggie) incoming
messages but it has no effect, why ? Or it's normal and this action only
for custom message saving ?
X-> Serge, former 2:5020/427.0
-- äÁ, Ñ ÐpÉÃÉÐÉÁÌØÎÙÊ, ÎÏ ÎÅ ÄÅÂÉÌ !
--
--
Ohayo gozaimasu, Ming-Li,
On Wednesday, July 19, 2000 at 17:27, you wa me ni kaita:
ML> Hi Dirk,
>> The External program must import it back to TB! with the
>> commandline parameter.
ML> That's what I thought. But I tried and it didn't work that way.
>> So Setup the filter Action for starting
Hi,
Does anybody know an easy way to move the filters from an account to
another?
--
Roger Chadel
Chadel Quality Software
http://www.chadel.com.br
/"\
\ / Campanha da fita ASCII - contra mail html
X ASCII ribbon campaign - against html
I have set up a new account in TB that I am transferring many of my
mailing list memberships to from an old account. I want to use many
of my old filters for that account. What do I need to copy and where
do I copy it to in order to copy over all the filters?
--
Best regards,
katsmeow
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 21:58:35 +0200, Donatello wrote:
D> I'd like to ask you one question. How can I automatically forward or
D> redirect a message (using filters) to a _group_ of people without
D> listing all the addresses? For example - I want all messages with a
D&g
Hello A.,
October 09, 2000, 8:01:26 PM, you wrote:
ACM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
ACM> Hash: SHA1
ACM> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 15:13:11 -0400, Don Mulvihill wrote:
DM>> do I need to make a 'new' kill filter for each word I want to
DM>> filter? Or is there a way to put multiple words in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Batlisters.
In a post time stamped 02:00:25 -0700 re: junk mail filters
Jason Thompson wrote:
R>> What is the best way to implement a junk mail filter?
JT> There have been extensive posting on this discus
On Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 9:12:59 AM, David wrote:
> Is there a way to backup your filters and templates?
Filters are stored in ACCOUNT.SRX under each account's home
directory. Account templates are stored in ACCOUNT.CFG, folder
templates in ACCOUNT.FLX, quick templates in ACC
Sunday, November 05, 2000, 11:41:52 AM, you wrote:
c> Hello TBUDL,
c> Do filters only MOVE messages? I need them to also COPY. Can it?
Yes, they can. Under actions -> Create a copy of the message in
another folder
--
--
Hello canderson,
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 at 05:41:52 GMT -0500 (which was 2:41 AM
where I live) witnesses say canderson typed:
> Do filters only MOVE messages? I need them to also COPY. Can it?
They sure can. Check under the Options tab. There are tons of things
you can do. It's a
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 at 02:56:08 GMT -0800 (which was 2:56 AM
where I live) witnesses say Januk Aggarwal typed:
>> Do filters only MOVE messages? I need them to also COPY. Can it?
> They sure can. Check under the Options tab. There are tons
On Sunday, November 05, 2000, 11:41:52 AM, canderson wrote:
c> Do filters only MOVE messages? I need them to also COPY. Can it?
Choose "Create A Copy Of Message In Another Folder" from the "Actions"
tab of the sorting office/filters settings.
Regards
--
Kari Jakob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 05:41:52 -0500, canderson wrote these
words of wisdom:
c> Do filters only MOVE messages? I need them to also COPY. Can it?
Yes. The option to do this is listed under the 'action' tab of the
message filter rule
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello canderson !
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 05:41:52 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was 05.11.2000, 11:41 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
> Do filters only MOVE messages? I need them to also COPY. Can it?
Account.Filters, Choose filter, g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
On 18 November 2000 at 20:51:49 -0500 (which was 01:51 where I
live) Michael P. Wilson wrote and made these points:
MPW> Has anyone figured out how to get access to the filters from
MPW> outside the TB interface?
I think th
Hello All,
Would I be right in assuming that there is no way to _schedule_ the
running of a manual filter?
My IMAP trash folder needs occasional purging, and this occurred to me
as a way of doing it. TB scheduler doesn't seem to support running a
filter.
Interested if anyone else has a way of d
Hi Bat Users,
Has any one used sub filters yet.
I can not figure how to use them and could do with a few pointers.
If you have not found them yet in the NFS, select a filter and press
Alt-ins and presto. You can do this quite a few times crating deep nests. :-)
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Hello MikeD,
Saturday, October 16, 2004, 6:26:19 AM, you wrote:
M3> Hello Michael,
M3> Friday, October 15, 2004, 11:49:11 PM, you wrote:
MLW>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MLW>> Hash: SHA1
MLW>> Hi,
MLW>> I get some pretty rude email spam. I have setup a filter to delete
MLW>> from the
Hello Stuart,
Saturday, October 16, 2004, 9:06:23 AM, you wrote:
SC> Michael is using Version 3 which does not have the "alternative" tab.
I guess I will have to bite the bullet soon and move up to 3
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 13:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just cehcking - if I do a full backup with everything everywhere
> ticked, doe the filters (account specific, and global) get backed up
> to and thus restored when necessary?
Yes.
Just did the same toda
Hi Thorvald Neumann
-
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, at 13:23:58 [GMT +0200] (which was 4:23 AM where
I live) you wrote:
>> Just cehcking - if I do a full backup with everything everywhere
>> ticked, doe the filters (account specific, and global) g
d it to a new backup file.
Completely uninstalled TB!, removed registry settings, new fresh
install and applied the backup.
All accounts, emails and filters are there. Otherwise it would have
been a really bad surprise for me, I am heavily relying on my filters...
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Ne
601 - 700 of 1445 matches
Mail list logo
