IMAP and spam

I know that both Spampal and K9 appear to be popular spamkill programs, but they are for POP3 servers (as are most client-side spam filters). What do people use for IMAP-based accounts? I do have the ability to enable Spam Assasin at the server level, which may be my answer. Any recommendations/s

IMAP and attachments

I've just changed over to using IMAP and everything seems to be working properly. But I've got one question (which may be a general IMAP question, not The Bat!, as I have the same problem with Thunderbird). I thought with IMAP attachments would only be downloaded if I tried to open or

IMAP and searching?

Hello TBUDL, i also tried out IMAP now and i'm confused, since there is no option to search, not even in the mail headers... Did i miss something or is that not possible with TB! -- Regards, Ralph|mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |PGP Key ID: 0x5F1A33E3 Running The Bat! 3.0.1.33

IMAP and subfolders

Hello: I am having some difficulty getting The Bat! configured properly with IMAP and subfolders. Basically I sort my incoming mail (via fetchmail) on my server. The messages are put into files in a subdirectory "Mail". So I have a directory structure like: Inbox Mail/Friends Mai

IMAP and filters

st. Scanning the various archives I can see that others have the same problem. Has anyone gotten filters to work with IMAP, and if so, how? -- Sean H. Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.01.3 | "

Re: IMAP and spam

Hello ken, Saturday, January 24, 2004, 5:54:39 PM, you wrote: kg> I know that both Spampal and K9 appear to be popular spamkill programs, kg> but they are for POP3 servers (as are most client-side spam filters). kg> What do people use for IMAP-based accounts? I've been testing Spampal with TB

Re: IMAP and spam

Steve Thomas wrote: > I've been testing Spampal with TB and IMAP. I've got several POP > accounts and one test IMAP account, all running through Spampal > (127.0.0.1). So far, so good. Spampal automatically set-up an IMAP > folder called inbox.spamtrap. All the suggested spam goes in there. I >

Re: IMAP and spam

Hello ken, Saturday, January 24, 2004, 6:16:53 PM, you wrote: kg> Is that IMAP account created from scratch? Yea, and deleted and re-added several times. I've also deleted all folders from the server and started over a couple of times - just as a part of the learning process. I still get acc

Re: IMAP and spam

Hello Allie, Sunday, January 25, 2004, 3:35:11 AM, you wrote: AM> This has been fixed for the next release. You could wait for the next AM> release or download and try the latest beta, then tell us what you think AM> on TBBETA. I've never been a big "beta" person - though it seems that even pub

Re: IMAP and spam

Steve Thomas wrote: > Spampal automatically set-up an IMAP > folder called inbox.spamtrap. All the suggested spam goes in there. I > found that to be very interesting. Did you do anything different when setting this up? Or was the only different in The Bat! that it's using the IMAP protocol? I

Re: IMAP and spam

ken green wrote: > I know you are having trouble with IMAP in general :( but would you > mind posting any relevant details/hints/instructions for setting up > SpamPal in The Bat using IMAP? Sorry. Please disregard. I was thinking of something else. Spampal claims to work with POP or IMAP acco

Re: IMAP and spam

Hello ken, Sunday, January 25, 2004, 1:36:17 PM, you wrote: kg> I know you are having trouble with IMAP in general :( "Having trouble" is too broad an expression. It works. I just get those occasional access violations, which occur occasionally when using the "Manage IMAP Folders" functi

Re: IMAP and spam

Steve Thomas wrote: > Just follow the same instructions as with POP. Set your Transport > settings as follows: I have SpamPal set up and it seems to be working. My first try resulted in connection/login problems, but I was using SpamPal 1.50. When I upgraded to the most recent version (1.5

Re: IMAP and spam

Hello ken, Sunday, January 25, 2004, 3:06:24 PM, you wrote: kg> However, I don't see the inbox.spamtrap folder that was supposed to get kg> created. Did it find any spam? I don't think that the folder was created until it actually discovered some spam. -- Best regards, Steve "Grief, like

Re: IMAP and spam

Steve Thomas wrote: > Did it find any spam? I don't think that the folder was created until > it actually discovered some spam. Interesting... That would make sense.. ;) I created a top-level spamtrap folder anyway. -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service P

IMAP and Sorting Office..

Should Sorting Office work with IMAP accounts? Because in v1.62r filters work fine, but in v2.02.3 CE filters (both Incoming and Read) do not work for IMAP accounts. Now, knowing what I know about the IMAP protocol (admittedly, that's not much...) is this the way IMAP accounts are *supposed* to b

IMAP and message download

I use TB with an IMAP account. When I connect to the server then TB retrieves the new message header. That's fine. When I click on a header in the header pane then TB automatically retrieves the message body. How can I stop this, because in many cases I'd like to delete the message ? I'd prefer i

Re: IMAP and attachments

Tim, [T] wrote: > I thought with IMAP attachments would only be downloaded if I tried > to open or save them. Not all IMAP clients will do this for you, especially on a message per message basis. Mulberry has this ability well implemented. So if you're finding this a show-stopper, give Mulberry a

Re: IMAP and attachments

Quoting Allie Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > One of TB!'s synchronization options is to sync only message headers > and text. What this does is to download headers and the message body > text to the local cache. However, attachments are not downloaded. It's > not until you wish to save or view the

Re: IMAP and searching?

Hi Ralph, On 28/3/2005 3:06 PM +0200, you wrote: i also tried out IMAP now and i'm confused, since there is no option to search, not even in the mail headers... Did i miss something or is that not possible with TB! What do you mean no option to search. You have all searching options at your disp

Re: IMAP and searching?

Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:30:23 PM (687 Beats): > Actually, no. It'll just work, but it wouldn't be as fast as if you had > all message bodies locally cached. Well, the only "search" method that works for me, is the alt-click-method (how do i return from those search results

Re: IMAP and searching?

Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:30:23 PM (687 Beats): > Actually, no. It'll just work, but it wouldn't be as fast as if you had > all message bodies locally cached. Well, the only "search" method that works for me, is the alt-click-method (how do i return from those search results

Re: IMAP and searching?

And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't seem to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in templates... -- Regards, Ralph|mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |PGP Key ID: 0x5F1A33E3 Running The Bat! 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2 pgp

Re: IMAP and searching?

Ralph Inselsbacher wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:50:15 PM (701 Beats): > And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't seem > to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in templates... Oops. It sometimes works and sometimes doesn't... -- Regards,

Re: IMAP and searching?

Hi Ralph, On 28/3/2005 3:46 PM +0200, you wrote: Well, the only "search" method that works for me, is the alt-click-method (how do i return from those search results to normal view). The other two don't work. Hmmm. Current TB! IMAP is such that I really can't speak with confidence about what you

Re: IMAP and searching?

Hi Ralph, On 28/3/2005 3:50 PM +0200, you wrote: And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't seem to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in templates... BTW, I see that you're running a beta version, and a beta version that I simply couldn't use for IM

Re: IMAP and searching?

Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:58:04 PM (706 Beats): > Hmmm. Current TB! IMAP is such that I really can't speak with > confidence about what you should be experiencing. It may very well be > that the search isn't working for you since, for message body searches, > TB! queries th

Re: IMAP and searching?

Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 4:00:35 PM (708 Beats): > BTW, I see that you're running a beta version, and a beta version that > I simply couldn't use for IMAP. AFAIK, my version was is the latest release version... confused now... -- Regards, Ralph|mailto:[EMAIL

Re: IMAP and searching?

Hi Ralph, On 28/3/2005 4:16 PM +0200, you wrote: That's a pity, because Thunderbird and Outlook 2003 really seem to cache the mails because one can search. For IMAP, you don't need to cache mail bodies to search. You shouldn't have to do that. ThunderBird doesn't cache mail bodies for searching.

Re: IMAP and searching?

Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 4:26:03 PM (726 Beats): > For IMAP, you don't need to cache mail bodies to search. You shouldn't > have to do that. ThunderBird doesn't cache mail bodies for searching. > It queries the server. Same for Mulberry, the client I'm currently > using most

Re: IMAP and searching?

Hi Ralph, On 28/3/2005 4:20 PM +0200, you wrote: AFAIK, my version was is the latest release version... confused now... Don't be. I'm the one confused. You're right!!! Sorry. :) IMAP is always changing. It's like a sinus wave of improvements and setbacks. I'd say IMAP was at a peak with the bet

Re: IMAP and searching?

Hi Ralph, On 28/3/2005 4:48 PM +0200, you wrote: As for bandwith: i use a 2mbit line, so that shouldn't be the bottleneck, i guess. That depends on the throughput your IMAP server allows. Bandwidth throttling may be there. However, if you are getting a 2Mbit connection then it shouldn't be a pr

IMAP and GMX (Mailprovider)

Hi! I did some test with IMAP and GMX and discovered some problems: 1. I create a new folder in The Bat. It is shown correct within GMX, but I have to restart The Bat to see the folder. 2. Existing folders using umlauts are shown very funny within the Bat (e.g. Pers&APY-nlich instea

IMAP and delete/trash

I'm experiencing some show-stopping problems using IMAP with TB 2.0. I know others have reported problems but are they wide spread or is there a peculiarity on individual machines making IMAP a real pain? 1. TB will not delete messages from their folder or from the server. Pressing delete

Re: IMAP and subfolders

Hello Brian, Thursday, September 4, 2003, 6:12:47 AM, you wrote: BSS> So I'm inferring that everyone has the same problem and it's not BSS> unique to my configuration?? Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post ma

Re: IMAP and subfolders

Hello Brian, Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 10:50:34 PM, you wrote: BSS> I have no problem subscribing to the folders, but The Bat! seems to BSS> want to check mail in "Mail" and "Mail/Newsletters". Since these are BSS> directories and not files (under University of Washington imap), The BSS> Bat!

Re: IMAP and subfolders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, September 04, 2003, Stefan Tanurkov wrote... BSS>> I have no problem subscribing to the folders, but The Bat! seems BSS>> to want to check mail in "Mail" and "Mail/Newsletters". > Do you mean - TB! just loops endlessly there and prevent

Re: IMAP and subfolders

Stefan: --On Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:00 PM -0400 Stefan Tanurkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do you mean - TB! just loops endlessly there and prevent other folders to be read or something else? By the way, an error sound could be switched off in the "Options|Preferences" dialogue at the S

Re: IMAP and subfolders

On Friday, September 05, 2003, Brian S. Schang wrote... > When The Bat! tries to select Mail during its polling, I get the > message: >IMAP - Cannot select the mailbox "Mail". Server reports: SELECT > failed: Can't open Mail: not a selectable mailbox > I can't figure out how to get The Bat!

Re: IMAP and subfolders

On Friday, September 05, 2003, Stefan Tanurkov wrote... > Please add it to the BT so it's not forgotten :-) Is the BT back up and running again? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Who is General Protection Fault and why is he reading my hard disk? pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: IMAP and subfolders

On Friday, September 05, 2003, Brian S. Schang wrote... JA>>> I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before JA>>> checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of what JA>>> is selectable and what isn't on first login. >> Please add it to the BT so it's not forgotten

Re: IMAP and subfolders

Friday, September 5, 2003, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Is the BT back up and running again? What's the BT? -- Urban There is a tremendous weight pushing down on the center of the Earth because of so much population stomping around up there these days. ___

Re: IMAP and subfolders

On September 5, 5:07 pm Urban wrote: >> Is the BT back up and running again? > > What's the BT? It's the Bug Tracker. It was on the mail site, but it was shut down while they rebuilt their site. I haven't had a chance to check to see if it's up again yet. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: IMAP and subfolders

Hello: Inbox Inbox.subs Inbox.subs.TBUDL Inbox.xxx Inbox.xxx.yyy So do Inbox.subs and Inbox.xxx contain messages, or are they just entities to hold TBUDL and yyy respectively? I have a similar structure and in my case they could contain messages, because they are regular folders, but they are em

Re: IMAP and subfolders

Hello Urban, On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:07:15 +0200 GMT (06/09/2003, 05:07 +0700 GMT), Urban wrote: >> Is the BT back up and running again? > What's the BT? Ritlabs' bugtracker system: www.ritlabs.com/bt -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. - THE HOTEL HAS BOWLING

Re: IMAP and subfolders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, September 05, 2003, Brian S. Schang wrote... >> I have a similar structure and in my case they could contain >> messages, because they are regular folders, but they are empty... >> which doesn't bother The Bat! at all. :-) Why not do it tha

Re: IMAP and filters

Sean H . wrote: > Has anyone gotten filters to work with IMAP, and if so, how? I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean that *no* filters work for you at all? Or only certain filters? I am using v1.62, which is limited in IMAP functionality compared to v2, but I am able to use filters w

Re: IMAP and filters

On Tuesday, October 21, 2003, Sean H. wrote... > I've been playing around with TB's IMAP a little bit, and find the > most annoying thing about it to be the lack of ability to filter > messages. Automatic filtering doesn't work, and when I 're-filter' a > folder, all my messages just disappear. N

Re: IMAP and filters

Jim D wrote: > I beg to differ. What you are effectively doing is popping your IMAP > account and filtering email in local folders. It's not really IMAP > because mail on the server stays in the Inbox. You just move it around > in your local folders. Ahh.. yes, you are correct. When I think of *fi

FYI: IMAP and GMX

Hi, for those fellow Bat users that have a Pro account with GMX I thought I'd provide the following snippet of information. I noticed that my IMAP to GMX connection frequently gets disconnected by the server. I contacted GMX's support about this and received as an answer that problems might occur

Re[2]: IMAP and spam

Steve Thomas, [ST] wrote: ST> Yea, and deleted and re-added several times. I've also deleted all ST> folders from the server and started over a couple of times - just as ST> a part of the learning process. ST> I still get access violations from time to time - no rhyme or reason ST> that I can see

Re[2]: IMAP and spam

Steve Thomas, [ST] wrote: ST> I've never been a big "beta" person - though it seems that even ST> published releases for TB are "beta-like." ST> But, if you'll kindly repeat how to get it, I'll give it a try. Subscribe for TB! beta downloads here http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/ The

Re: IMAP and SpamPal setup

FWIW, anyone setting up SpamPal on The Bat should shut down and re-start TB after setting up an IMAP server the first time. I thought it was an upgrade/latest version issue, but it happened again with the second IMAP account I set up. I would get login errors trying to connect to the IMAP server r

Re: IMAP and SpamPal setup

Hello ken, Sunday, January 25, 2004, 3:26:42 PM, you wrote: kg> Ken Green kg> Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Also, Ken, please note that my experience with TB and SpamPal is with version 2.02. I have no idea how all this will work with version 1.6. -- B

Re: IMAP and SpamPal setup

Steve Thomas wrote: > Also, Ken, please note that my experience with TB and SpamPal is with > version 2.02. I have no idea how all this will work with version 1.6. Sorry for the confusion. I am running two versions of The Bat on my desktop and laptop. My laptop has The Bat 2.03 CE installed an

Re: IMAP and Sorting Office..

ken green wrote: kg> Should Sorting Office work with IMAP accounts? It currently doesn't work automatically on incoming Inbox messages. This is being worked on. kg> Because in v1.62r filters work fine, but in v2.02.3 CE filters kg> (both Incoming and Read) do not work for IMAP accounts. The do

Re: IMAP and Sorting Office..

Allie Martin wrote: > It currently doesn't work automatically on incoming Inbox messages. > This is being worked on. OK. Manual is better than nothing, I suppose... :) > Read and replied filters do work automatically though. Not my experience. But I could have done something wrong. I will t

Re: IMAP and Sorting Office..

Allie Martin wrote: > There are two ways a message can be marked as read. > - you manually mark it read. > - it's automatically marked as read as defined in the account > preferences/options. Understood. I don't expect the filters to work when manually marking messages read. > Read filter

Re: IMAP and Sorting Office..

Allie Martin wrote: kg>> I have it set for fast connection. RE: dragging and dropping to kg>> another folder - I will confirm, but yes, I believe the behavior kg>> you describe is what is happening. > In the mail management setup for the account properties, do you have > the 'autoconnect to server

Re: IMAP and message download

Hello Mml, Mmd> body. How can I stop this, because in many cases I'd like to delete Mmd> the message ? You can't stop it yet. -- 9Val Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://w

Re[2]: IMAP and searching?

Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:12:13 PM (675 Beats): > What do you mean no option to search. You have all searching options at > your disposal. For a full text search, i guess, i have to make a full sync - is that right? > The search dialog doesn't seem to work since there's no

Re[2]: IMAP and searching?

Hello Ralph, Monday, March 28, 2005, 7:46:40 AM, you wrote: RI> Well, the only "search" method that works for me, is the alt-click-method RI> (how do i return from those search results to normal view). The other two RI> don't work. To get the quick search to work you first have to select a mess

Re[2]: IMAP and searching?

Hello Ralph, Monday, March 28, 2005, 8:20:10 AM, you wrote: >> BTW, I see that you're running a beta version, and a beta version that >> I simply couldn't use for IMAP. RI> AFAIK, my version was is the latest release version... confused now... Yes, I believe it is. And given that fact you may s

Re[2]: IMAP and searching?

On Monday, March 28, 2005 @ 5:58:04 AM [-0700], Allie Martin wrote: > This why the search dialog just sits > there claiming the search was done and no matches found. You wait and > then the matches suddenly appear. Ugh. This is such a bad "feature". I don't know how many times I've closed down t

Re: IMAP and GMX (Mailprovider)

Hi, Oliver wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : > I did some test with IMAP and GMX and discovered some problems: > 1. I create a new folder in The Bat. It is shown correct within GMX, but I > have to restart The Bat to see the folder. Have you tried the IMAP folder management dialog,

Re: IMAP and GMX (Mailprovider)

Hi! > > 1. I create a new folder in The Bat. It is shown correct within GMX, but > > I have to restart The Bat to see the folder. > Have you tried the IMAP folder management dialog, it should find the new > folder. Hmmm... I created the folder with the folder management :) > > 2. Existing folder

Re: IMAP and delete/trash

Hi Clive, On 9/3/03 at 1:07 PM, Clive Taylor wrote: CT> 1. TB will not delete messages from their folder or from the CT> server. Pressing delete does nothing. Changing advanced CT> options|mail management to "mark as delete" does no such thing. CT> It removes the message from the

Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

On Thursday, September 04, 2003, Clive Taylor wrote: CT> Yup. Keep complaining. IMAP doesn't work well in this version - CT> a big disappointment. I concur with that. The IMAP support is *better* than in v1.x by far, but it still needs more work. It's kinda sad that Outlook Express has very go

Re: IMAP and delete/trash

Hello Clive, Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 2:07:00 PM, you wrote: CT> 1. TB will not delete messages from their folder or from the CT> server. Pressing delete does nothing. This may happen due to error in processing or because the destination folder used as Trash does not exist. Basicall

Re: IMAP and delete/trash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, September 04, 2003, Stefan Tanurkov wrote... CT>> 1. TB will not delete messages from their folder or from the CT>> server. Pressing delete does nothing. > This may happen due to error in processing or because the > destination folder us

Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

Hello Jonathan, Friday, September 5, 2003, 1:35:05 AM, you wrote: JA> I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before JA> checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of what is JA> selectable and what isn't on first login. Please add it to the BT so it's not forgott

Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

Hi, Brian S. Schang wrote: > Clive, >> Inbox >> Inbox.subs >> Inbox.subs.TBUDL >> Inbox.xxx >> Inbox.xxx.yyy > So do Inbox.subs and Inbox.xxx contain messages, or are they just > entities to hold TBUDL and yyy respectively? I have a similar structure and in my case they could contain messages

Re: IMAP and delete/trash

On Friday, September 05, 2003, Stefan Tanurkov wrote... JA>> Interesting. I had TB creating a whole bunch of folders on my JA>> Exchange server today. Deleted Items.1, Sent Items.1, Trash.1, JA>> Trash, etc etc. Ended up having to close TB, and resort to JA>> Outlook to fix things. > Hmm. Interes

Re: IMAP and delete/trash

On Friday, September 05, 2003, Stefan Tanurkov wrote... > OK, in case you did not know - names of all IMAP folders but Inbox > are case-sensitive. I.e. Inbox.trash and Inbox.Trash are two > different folders, while inBox.trash and INBOX.trash refers to the > same folder. I really hate this because

Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

Hello: >> It's my understanding (maybe erroneously) that not all >> implementations of IMAP allow for folder to contain messages >> themselves?? I'm using the University of Washington version that >> ships with Red Hat 7.2. JA> That's not an erroneous statement at all. In fact, a very valid JA> s

Re[2]: IMAP and filters

On 10/21/2003, in ken green said: > I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean that *no* filters work for you > at all? Or only certain filters? I am using v1.62, which is limited in > IMAP functionality compared to v2, but I am able to use filters with > IMAP accounts. I beg

Exhange/IMAP and mail management

TheBat-users, Below I have listed other issues I have regarding using TheBat in an Exchange environment: * TB wants to save drafts in the IMAP "Outbox" folder which leads to problems, as Exchange cannot seam to handle that. I cannot specify a Drafts folder in TB. * I cann

Re[2]: IMAP and Sorting Office..

ken green wrote: kg> OK. Manual is better than nothing, I suppose... :) Yes. >> Read and replied filters do work automatically though. kg> Not my experience. But I could have done something wrong. I will kg> test this some more. How are you marking items as read? There are two ways a message

Re[2]: IMAP and SpamPal setup

Hello ken, Monday, January 26, 2004, 12:26:42 AM, you wrote: kg> FWIW, anyone setting up SpamPal on The Bat should shut down and re-start kg> TB after setting up an IMAP server the first time. kg> I thought it was an upgrade/latest version issue, but it happened again kg> with the second IMAP ac

Re[3]: IMAP and SpamPal setup

Hello Jean, Monday, January 26, 2004, 6:50:51 AM, you wrote: JS> What FWIW stands for ? JS> Thanks for help. It stands for "For What It's Worth" You might find the NetLingo site helpful for looking these up (there are so many acronyms in use!) http://www.netlingo.com/lookup.cfm?term=f

Re[2]: IMAP and Sorting Office..

ken green wrote: >> Try dragging and dropping a message to another folder. If your >> connection is fast, the operation should be immediately carried out as >> if it were POP. However, if the connection is slow, it would seem as >> if nothing happened. At the next sync operation, TB! will send >>

Re[2]: IMAP and Sorting Office..

Ken Green, [KG] wrote: KG> No. I had auto-connect for -managing folders and -when account is KG> selected. NOT -by any command. Will try that and report back. Ok. KG> At what point does the folder's synchronization settings take over? KG> If a folder is set to synch and it doesn't exist on th

Re: Re[2]: IMAP and searching?

Hi Ralph, On 28/3/2005 3:18 PM +0200, you wrote: For a full text search, i guess, i have to make a full sync - is that right? Actually, no. It'll just work, but it wouldn't be as fast as if you had all message bodies locally cached. The alt-click and quick searching also work. How to use those?

Re: Re[2]: IMAP and searching?

Hi Matt, On 28/3/2005 12:53 PM -0800, you wrote: Ugh. This is such a bad "feature". I don't know how many times I've closed down the search window thinking it just wasn't working. I only discovered this when I left it open by mistake and suddenly saw all kinds of results on my search. At the leas

Converting to IMAP and common folders

Wednesday, October 30, 2002 Hello group I have an account with about 9,000 messages. I would like to convert it to IMAP so that I can access them when I am away from my main computer. I have my own email server (ALT-N Mdaemon) so I can tell it what folders I want,

IMAP and GMX and the Bat

Hi, GMX has proudly announced that subscribers with professional accounts may now also access their email via IMAP. Yet, they currently have it only optimized for Outlook and Outlook Express (newer Netscape versions may also work but they are not officially supported yet). I tried it and did not

Fastmail, IMAP and The Bat! 2.0

Hello tbudl, Is anyone else using Fastmail with The Bat! 2.0? I am curious about how you have set the IMAP Options for Root Folder and the pre-defined folders. I have tried many different combinations and cannot get The Bat! to use the Sent Items and Trash folders on Fastmail. Any help will be

Re[2]: IMAP and delete/trash

Hello Jonathan, Friday, September 5, 2003, 1:37:38 AM, you wrote: JA> Interesting. I had TB creating a whole bunch of folders on my Exchange JA> server today. Deleted Items.1, Sent Items.1, Trash.1, Trash, etc etc. JA> Ended up having to close TB, and resort to Outlook to fix things. Hmm. Intere

Re[2]: IMAP and delete/trash

Hello Clive, Friday, September 5, 2003, 3:04:34 AM, you wrote: CT>>> 1. TB will not delete messages from their folder or from the CT>>> server. Pressing delete does nothing. ST>> This may happen due to error in processing or because the destination ST>> folder used as Trash does not exist

Re: Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

Hello: JA> I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before JA> checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of what is JA> selectable and what isn't on first login. Please add it to the BT so it's not forgotten :-) The \NoSelect flag can be detected, but it is not u

Re: Exhange/IMAP and mail management

Hi Peter, on 10/11/03 you wrote: PF> * TB wants to save drafts in the IMAP "Outbox" folder which leads to PF> problems, as Exchange cannot seam to handle that. I cannot specify PF> a Drafts folder in TB. I have the Drafts folder on my server set to synchronise with the Outbox in

Re: Exhange/IMAP and mail management

David, On 10-11-2003 22:50, you [D] wrote in : PF>> * TB wants to save drafts in the IMAP "Outbox" folder which PF>> leads to problems, as Exchange cannot seam to handle that. I PF>> cannot specify a Drafts folder in TB. D> I have the Drafts folder on my se

Re: Exhange/IMAP and mail management

Hi Peter, on 10/11/03 you wrote: PF> Since I don't have access to the server, I need to make TB behave with PF> the Exchange server and not the other way round. PF> Hints? Sorry no. Out of my depth now, I'm afraid. -- David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows 2000 Service

POP3 then IMAP and back to POP3?

Hi My ISPs have all agreed to install IMAP - except the Microsoft Exchange Server one - pah! Anyway, I have located the Protocol change button in the Account Properties. So I assume I can select IMAP as a method on an account by account basis. If I change an account to IMAP and it's no

Re:POP3 then IMAP and back to POP3?

t our in-house users access via an IMAP client. Our traveling users access the same message store using a web client via POP3. So it is possible to co-exist IMAP and POP with the same e-mail address. If your mail server is in-house, this shouldn't be problem to set up. -- Best Regards, K

Re: Converting to IMAP and common folders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, Francis X. Mendez wrote... > I have an account with about 9,000 messages. I would like to convert > it to IMAP so that I can access them when I am away from my main > computer. I have my own email server (ALT-N Mdaemon)

Re: Converting to IMAP and common folders

On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:56:38PM -0500 or thereabouts, Francis X. Mendez wrote: > Wednesday, October 30, 2002 > Hello group > I have an account with about 9,000 messages. I would like to > convert it to IMAP so that I can access them when I am away > from my main compute

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

Hello Markus, On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:15:22 +0100 GMT (09/12/02, 16:15 +0700 GMT), Markus Gloede wrote: > P.S.: This messages has been posted before on the "the Bat off-topic > list" but apparently there aren't any GMX pro account users there. I > posting to this list to find out if anyone here is

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

Hi, Thomas Fernandez wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : > They also say that support for other mail clients will follow > shortly. I also read their announcement with interest. Yet, I'm not inclined to sit back and wait. > I don't know why IMAP support depends so much on the client used, > but

Re: IMAP and GMX and the Bat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, December 09, 2002, Markus Gloede wrote... >> I don't know why IMAP support depends so much on the client used, >> but according to their mailing, there is no reason to assume that >> this first version should work with TB at all. > I recal

  1   2   >