Re: Looking for an SMTP server

On Sunday, 30 June 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: awc> re: Postcast.. I was shocked it only took me 30 minutes awc> (including download) to get it up and running. had to change the awc> port to 26.. so easy.,. works great too.. no rejects to major awc> corp's. I tried Postcast some time ago, but

Re: Looking for an SMTP server

On Saturday, June 29, 2002, 7:28 PM, you wrote: e: >> yup, me too ;) >> as a UNIX sysadm I could do all kinds fo stuff, but I never set up an >> SMTP server anywhere. I have 5 email accounts myself, and I'd love to >> run them all from my own SMTP server. I've

Re[2]: Looking for an SMTP server

Hello Paul, Saturday, June 29, 2002, 4:15:49 PM, you wrote: PC> yup, me too ;) PC> as a UNIX sysadm I could do all kinds fo stuff, but I never set up an PC> SMTP server anywhere. I have 5 email accounts myself, and I'd love to PC> run them all from my own SMTP server. I

Re: Looking for an SMTP server

Hi Paul, On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 19:15:49 -0400, you wrote: > yup, me too ;) > as a UNIX sysadm I could do all kinds fo stuff, but I never set up an > SMTP server anywhere. I have 5 email accounts myself, and I'd love to > run them all from my own SMTP server. I've heard Merc

Re: Looking for an SMTP server

On Saturday, June 29, 2002, 12:18 PM, you wrote: ACM> I'm quite sure that your surprise the very basis behind so many not ACM> using their own SMTP server as the means to deal with the problem of ACM> not being able to send messages via an ISP SMTP server with any From ACM> add

Re[2]: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

eeds to me is some drivel about signing up for $399-99 per year. Oh John.. this concussion has got the best of me, it's postcast, not PointCast.. here's the url http://www.postcast.com/html/download.asp of course they have other things that cost $$ but the SMTP server is free. and

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hello John, > I couldn't find that post at all. Can you give an URL for the Pointcast Server? I guess she meant to say PostCast -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c _

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hello alists You wrote On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, at 09:03:35 [GMT -0700] (02:03:35 Sunday, 30 June 2002 where I live):- > Some wise soul on this list last week mentioned pointcast server > which is free. I thought what the heck while i'm healing here i > have nothing more to do but try stuff so..

Re: Looking for an SMTP server

ing more to do but try stuff so.. i downloaded it (it's A> free).. and actually got it up and running!! in less than 1/2 A> hour AND it worked.. I'm quite sure that your surprise the very basis behind so many not using their own SMTP server as the means to deal with the problem o

Re[2]: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hello Tim, Saturday, June 29, 2002, 5:25:02 AM, you wrote: TM> If you connect via an ISP like NetZero that blocks port 25, the only TM> way to overcome it would be to have the SMTP send go to a different TM> port. That would require a host that is *not* NetZero attached that TM>

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

me to time. JP> Mail Direct is very simple to set up, and comes with default IP JP> addresses to enable mail sending, thus overcoming your ISP JP> blocking ports 25 or 53 (at least I hope so!) If you connect via an ISP like NetZero that blocks port 25, the only way to overcome it would be t

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hello Marcus You wrote On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, at 17:00:37 [GMT +0200] (01:00:37 Friday, 28 June 2002 where I live):- > I am looking for an password protected SMTP server which allows me to > send mail wherever I am, not depending on who my ISP is for the moment. Have a look at Mail

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hello tracer, On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 06:49:23 +0700 GMT (28/06/02, 06:49 +0700 GMT), tracer wrote: t> correct, it works and in my case as I live in Thailand I set accounts t> up for a lot of the girls who want to contact boyfriends. Menus's can t> be set to many languages, including Thai... (if use

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hello Tim Musson, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 13:31:55 -0400 GMT your local time, which was Friday, June 28, 2002, 12:31:55 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Tim Musson wrote: > Hey Marcus, > My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal > to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > on Thu

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hi, Eric wrote: > I don't use any company service. I've installed Mercury/32 on my own XP > system as a SMTP server and client and I can send mails without depending > on my ISP. (it's a freeware http://www.pmail.com/whatsnew/new_m32.htm). Nice idea. But there are man

Re[2]: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hello Marcus, Thursday, June 27, 2002, 6:06:42 PM, you wrote: Marcus Ohlström> On Thursday, June 27, 2002, 18:35, jon hind wrote: >> Does your ISP offer autheticated SMTP or pop3 before smtp >> authentication ? Marcus Ohlström> No they don't and the refuse to do.

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

On 6/27/02 at 9:33 PM Marcus Ohlström wrote: >On Thursday, June 27, 2002, 21:23, Eric Malausséna wrote: > >> I don't use any company service. I've installed Mercury/32 on my own >> XP system as a SMTP server and client and I can send mails without >> depending o

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

On Thursday, June 27, 2002, 21:23, Eric Malausséna wrote: > I don't use any company service. I've installed Mercury/32 on my own > XP system as a SMTP server and client and I can send mails without > depending on my ISP. (it's a freeware > http://www.pmail.com/whatsne

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hi Marcus, On jeudi 27 juin 2002 at 17:00:37, you wrote : MO> Hello, MO> I am looking for an password protected SMTP server which allows me to MO> send mail wherever I am, not depending on who my ISP is for the moment. MO> It should be run by a serious company, I do not want an o

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

On Thursday, June 27, 2002, 17:20, tracer wrote: >> I am looking for an password protected SMTP server which allows me to >> send mail wherever I am, not depending on who my ISP is for the >> moment. > As far as I know myrealbox.com does it. Thank you, I'll ch

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hey Marcus, My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thursday, June 27, 2002 at 1:06:11 PM. >> To clarify Marcus's request (as I understood it): he is looking for >> a service that allows relaying (with different From addresses). M

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

On Thursday, June 27, 2002, 18:35, jon hind wrote: > Does your ISP offer autheticated SMTP or pop3 before smtp > authentication ? No they don't and the refuse to do. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

On Thursday, June 27, 2002, 17:41, Markus Gloede wrote: >> I am looking for an password protected SMTP server which allows me to >> send mail wherever I am, not depending on who my ISP is for the >> moment. > To clarify Marcus's request (as I understood it): he is lo

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hello Marcus, Thursday, June 27, 2002, 4:00:37 PM, you wrote: Marcus Ohlström> Hello, Marcus Ohlström> I am looking for an password protected SMTP server which allows me to Marcus Ohlström> send mail wherever I am, not depending on who my ISP is for the moment. Marcus Ohlström>

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

On 6/27/02 at 11:39 AM Tim Musson wrote: >Hey tracer, > >My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60m) Personal >to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >on Thursday, June 27, 2002 at 11:20:15 AM. > >>> I am looking for an password protected SMTP serv

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hey tracer, My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60m) Personal to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thursday, June 27, 2002 at 11:20:15 AM. >> I am looking for an password protected SMTP server which allows me >> to send mail wherever I am, not depending

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hi, Marcus Ohlström wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : > I am looking for an password protected SMTP server which allows me to > send mail wherever I am, not depending on who my ISP is for the moment. > It should be run by a serious company, I do not want an open relay > server but

Re: [SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hello Marcus Ohlström, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:00:37 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, June 27, 2002, 10:00:37 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Marcus Ohlström wrote: > Hello, > I am looking for an password protected SMTP server which allows me to > send mail wherever

Re: Looking for an SMTP server

Hej Marcus, --->>> Marcus Ohlström / Donnerstag, 27.06.2002, 17:00:37 Looking for an SMTP server > I am looking for an password protected SMTP server which allows me > to send mail wherever I am, not depending on who my ISP is for the > moment. > It should be run

[SOT] Looking for an SMTP server

Hello, I am looking for an password protected SMTP server which allows me to send mail wherever I am, not depending on who my ISP is for the moment. It should be run by a serious company, I do not want an open relay server but a service I can subscribe to and trust for a long time. Anyone know

Re: SMTP Transport configuration

Hello Damian, On Thursday, June 20, 2002 at 11:20:31 PM you [DG] wrote (at least in part): >> So if the cert is (self) signed for 'mail.me.com' you'll have to use >> 'mail.me.com' in account!!! DG> Already done. I'll try to find out how to import the public key... Save the public key in a tex

Re: SMTP Transport configuration

27;ve entered in account settings. > So if the cert is (self) signed for 'mail.me.com' you'll have to use > 'mail.me.com' in account!!! Already done. I'll try to find out how to import the public key... DG>> And secondly, SMTP AUTH seems to be broken?

Re: SMTP Transport configuration

Hello Damian, On Thursday, June 20, 2002 at 10:02:26 PM you [DG] wrote (at least in part): DG> And a couple more questions on the Transport configuration, SMTP section. DG> I can't seem to get TLS to work properly with my mail server. I can see DG> that it transmits the certifi

SMTP Transport configuration

And a couple more questions on the Transport configuration, SMTP section. I can't seem to get TLS to work properly with my mail server. I can see that it transmits the certificate, but then dies very shortly afterwards. It's a self-signed cert -- do I need to import it into TB!?

Re: SMTP servers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas F [TF] wrote: ... ACM>> MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense ACM>> that it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP ACM>> SMTP server instead of doing a direct delivery. TF> OK t

Re: SMTP servers

On Sun, 26 May 2002 01:18:29 +0700 Thomas F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ACM> MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense > ACM> that it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP > ACM> SMTP server instead of doing a direct delivery. &

Re: SMTP servers

s from any account. :-) ACM> At what speed? Acceptable. With my different accounts, I use SMTP servers in Asia, Europe, and USA. The SMTP server for this one account is in the States (see headers). ACM> Slower than your ISP's SMTP server I'd bet. My cable ISP in Taiwan was EThome.net

Re: SMTP servers

Hello Allie, On Sat, 25 May 2002 12:54:14 -0500 GMT (26/05/02, 00:54 +0700 GMT), Allie C Martin wrote: ACM> MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense that ACM> it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP SMTP server ACM> instead of doing a direct

Re: SMTP servers

Hi Thomas, On Sat, 25 May 2002 13:36:06 +0700, you wrote: > Hello Reza, > > On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:29:46 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:29 +0700 GMT), > Reza Habib wrote: > > RH> Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay your mail to the > RH> host directly, byp

Re: SMTP servers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas F [TF] wrote: ... TF> You need to stay connected until the mail is actually delivered. TF> Out of the question for me on per-minute dial-up. Same holds true TF> for an SMTP server on my machine. MDaemon here can be configured to us

Re: SMTP servers

than your ISP's SMTP server I'd bet. TF> No need to install an SMTP server on your computer. Leave the TF> headache of connecting to POP servers all over the world to the TF> people with the 24/7 connection and the broad bandwidth. ;-) When I still had my dialup account, I used to us

Re: SMTP servers

Hello Keith, On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:06:23 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:06 +0700 GMT), Keith Rodrigues wrote: KR> 2) Use a free email service that allows you to send from their KR> smtp server, with authentication. I use myrealbox KR> (www.myrealbox.com) for this. Set up an account with them

Re: SMTP servers

Hello Reza, On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:29:46 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:29 +0700 GMT), Reza Habib wrote: RH> Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay your mail to the RH> host directly, bypassing the isp. That would be a really cool feature RH> for TB to adopt. You need to stay

Re: SMTP servers

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Allie C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RD> How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes > RD> via the smtp of the ISP which we are connected to'? > Your best bet would be to use your own SMTP s

Re[3]: SMTP servers

Saturday, 25 May 2002 Hi Chris, On Sat, 25 May 2002, at 09:48:25 [GMT +1200] (which was 9:48 a.m. here in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote: CH> There is a quicker way and that is to left click on the account Sorry everyone I should have said RIGHT click! -- Regards, Chris Smile and Be Happy!

Re[3]: SMTP servers

Saturday, 25 May 2002 Hi Chris, On Sat, 25 May 2002, at 09:48:25 [GMT +1200] (which was 9:48 a.m. here in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote: CH> Saturday, 25 May 2002 CH> Hi Dwight, CH> On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 11:33:42 [GMT -0500] (which was 4:33 a.m. here CH> in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote: DAC>>

Re[2]: SMTP servers

Saturday, 25 May 2002 Hi Dwight, On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 11:33:42 [GMT -0500] (which was 4:33 a.m. here in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote: DAC> or drag the message to the outbox of the account to DAC> which you are connected. There is a quicker way and that is to left click on the account liste

Re[2]: SMTP servers

Hello Ray Dawson, Friday, May 24, 2002, 10:55:29 AM, in a galaxy far, far away, Ray wrote: RD> How on earth do other users manage with SMTP posting and RD> multiple accounts? Surely relying on third-party applications RD> to send mail is not normal? I can be connected to any one of

Re: SMTP servers

KE> It's a pity that TB doesn't do this. One of the few good things KE> with Becky! was that it had an option that said something like KE> "send all outboxes mail through this account" or something to that Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay y

Re: SMTP servers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 MW> If not, and if at least one of your ISP accounts *will* allow you to MW> access their SMTP server while you're logged on to someplace else, set MW> that server as your SMTP account. Then do as above and place a MW> checkmark in

Re: SMTP servers

uot; or something to that effect. This KE> meant that you could send all outgoing mail regardless of isp, (or so KE> i understand it) and it went out through the smtp server of the KE> account with which i currently worked. KE> And you would have to change the setting each time yo

Re: SMTP servers

Ray- You may have some more options here. I've set this up for a client in the following manner: Go to Account | Properties | Transport | Send Mail and click the Authentication button. It's possible that "Use POP before SMTP authentication" is all you need. This works for m

Re: SMTP servers

Hello Krister, > This meant that you could send all outgoing mail regardless of isp, > (or so i understand it) and it went out through the smtp server of > the account with which i currently worked. If I understand correctly what you mean, that would not solve the problem completely.

Re: SMTP servers

Hi Dwight, It so happened that On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 11:33:42 [GMT -0500] (which was 18:33 in my corner of the world) ,you typed: >> Why does TB insist on only sending mail through the smtp of the >> account it was written from rather than the account it's connected >&g

Re: SMTP servers

Hello Allie, > Freeware that immediately comes to mind is Mercury/32. It will solve > your SMTP headache and make interesting possibilities for you in terms > of it's POP server support. Mercury/32 is a great mail server, well supported and totally FREE. I have used it for abou

Re: SMTP servers

Hey Allie, My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60m) to write the following on Friday, May 24, 2002 at 11:21:00 AM. RD>> How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes RD>> via the smtp of the ISP which we are connected to'? ACM> Your best bet woul

Re: SMTP servers

On Friday, May 24, 2002, 10:55:29 AM, Ray Dawson wrote: > Why does TB insist on only sending mail through the smtp of the > account it was written from rather than the account it's connected > to? It doesn't. It sends it through the account where the message is in the out

Re: SMTP servers

On Friday, May 24, 2002, Ray Dawson wrote... > This may be the one single thing that stops me using TB - which is a > pity as I was really getting it working. > How on earth do other users manage with SMTP posting and multiple > accounts? I run several mail servers, so I do

Re: SMTP servers

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2002, Ray Dawson wrote: > > How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes via > > the smtp of the ISP which we are connected to'? > it is not po

Re: SMTP servers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ray Dawson [RD] wrote: ... RD> The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to RD> send all email in the various Outboxes through the smtp server of RD> the ISP I'm logged on to. If I click on 'Send All' T

Re: SMTP servers

On Fri, 24 May 2002 20:22:39 +0700 Syafril Hermansyah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send > > > all email in the various Outboxes through the smtp server of the > > > ISP > I'm l

Re: SMTP servers

On Fri, 24 May 2002 13:21:58 +0100 Ray Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send > all email in >the various Outboxes through the smtp server of the ISP > I'm logged on to. If I >click on '

Re: SMTP servers

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Ray Dawson wrote: > I've got accounts with four different ISPs and send email with all four > for different purposes. > > The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send all > email in the various Outboxes through the smtp serve

SMTP servers

I've got accounts with four different ISPs and send email with all four for different purposes. The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send all email in the various Outboxes through the smtp server of the ISP I'm logged on to. If I click on 'S

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Wed, 22 May 2002 at 06:01 GMT -0500 (22/05/2002 18:01 where you think I live) "Jonathan Angliss"=[JA] wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] : >> However, we still insist that the SMTP sender domain exists in the >> DNS, on the grounds that (auto)replies may not work unless the

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Wed, 22 May 2002 at 06:01 GMT -0500 (22/05/2002 18:01 where you think I live) "Jonathan Angliss"=[JA] wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] : >> BTW. I didn't activate RDNS for home.worldless.net. > Have you enabled it now? Seems to rDNS very well to me. No because it's fine for you and me but not oth

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote: ... JA> I've setup mine in a similar fashion, and the server requires a JA> HELO/EHLO before anything goes anywhere. I think the server drops JA> about 3 mails a day, of which I really am not bothered, chances JA> are, the

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

e Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To : Syafril Hermansyah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date : Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 10:10:00 PM > Subject: PTR records > > PS - note the difference between the SMTP Sender's domain and > whether it exists and the IP address of the se

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Date : Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 10:10:00 PM Subject: PTR records PS - note the difference between the SMTP Sender's domain and whether it exists and the IP address of the sending host (which could be quite different, as in messages from a mailing list). I used to block messages f

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, May 20, 2002, at 12:29:47 PM PST, Christopher Taylor-Davies wrote: > Is there a way to configure TB to attempt to authenticate with the > SMTP server's pop service before sending mail? Hello Christopher, I mentioned in anot

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, Marcus Ohlström wrote... >> How many people do you know that try doing reverse lookups on domain >> names/ip addresses in email headers? > Probably no one but my concern is with SMTP-servers, not with people. > And I don't know many SMTP-se

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Hello Christopher, > Mail disappearing silently into a black hole would be dismal... Mail shouldn't disappear silently. In the case we are considering you should get back a "451 Sender domain must resolve" error from the destination server. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spai

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 8:07:14 AM, Marcus Ohlström wrote: >> How many people do you know that try doing reverse lookups on >> domain names/ip addresses in email headers? > Probably no one but my concern is with SMTP-servers, not with people. > And I don't know many S

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcus Ohlström [MO] wrote: ... MO> Would it make sense if I specify just any valid domain? If I MO> understand you correctly Allie this is what you have done? Correct; and I've done this sending mail via my two ISP's. It doesn't matter if you're b

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 14:55, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > How many people do you know that try doing reverse lookups on domain > names/ip addresses in email headers? Probably no one but my concern is with SMTP-servers, not with people. And I don't know many SMTP-servers :-) >&

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, Miguel A. Urech wrote... > Mail shouldn't disappear silently. In the case we are considering > you should get back a "451 Sender domain must resolve" error from > the destination server. You are right... mail should not just *disappear*... but there are some

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Hello Allie, > I have had no problems at all since I define a valid domain name, > 'ac-martin.com' when sending mail and I make no effort to mask the > source IP, which will again turn out to be a valid one though it > points to my ISP's zone. That is my case and, once in a while, my e-mail is r

Re: Re[2]: Pop/Smtp authentication

; are operational. I didn't try IIS SMTP5 under XP myself, but I used it under W2K Pro when I still used Windows at home. This week I have been made SMTP Stress Test for some MTA either under Win or Linux and one of them is IIS SMTP combine with Mail Essentials under W2K Advance Server,

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Hi Marcus, On Tue, 21 May 2002 13:47:12 +0200, you wrote: > I will setup my SMTP-server on a laptop which I will use at at least > three places: > > 1) at home where I have a static IP with no security at the ISP level, > all security is managed by my own firewall This wi

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Tue, 21 May 2002 13:15:27 +0100 Christopher Taylor-Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote to Syafril Hermansyah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > You are using XP eh.., you can activate IIS-SMTP then. IMHO IIS > > SMTP5 quite OK. > > Is that installed as a standard part of

Re[2]: Pop/Smtp authentication

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:22:29 AM RE: "Pop/Smtp authentication" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greetings Christopher, On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 8:15:27 AM, you wrote: Christopher> Is that installed as a standard part of Wind

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 9:39:18 AM, Syafril wrote: > You are using XP eh.., you can activate IIS-SMTP then. IMHO IIS SMTP5 > quite OK. Is that installed as a standard part of Windows XP Professional? There is nothing resembling it in my list of services. Regards Chris

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 12:47:12 PM, Marcus wrote: > Maybe the easiest solution would be to try this setup myself. My final > question then is, will I notice any problems or could I be in a > position where I believe that the mail has been delivered although > they were rejected by the other si

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Hey Miguel, My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60c) Business to write the following on Tuesday, May 21, 2002 at 3:41:48 AM. >> G... The hassle I have been through keeping 2 ISP PW's in sync >> for my wife! No longer MAU> You owe me a beer then ;-) next time you are in Michigan drop m

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

e IP, which will again turn out to be a valid one though it > points to my ISP's zone. Allie, I take our private discussion back on list since it seams like there is more people interested in this. I will setup my SMTP-server on a laptop which I will use at at least three places: 1) at home

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote: ... MAU> No, you are right. I wouldn't say "many" but at least some MAU> servers are configured to do a reverse lookup on the IP of the MAU> sender and if the IP "does not resolve" they will not accept the MAU> message. Th

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Hello Marcus, > I'm not sure about this, but I've heard from what I consider being a > trustworthy source that this might cause trouble, since many > SMTP-servers out there does not allow connections from unknown > servers. By unknown I mean servers which does not have a

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Per Goetterup [PG] wrote: ... PG> Still we get a lot of customers with problems... All due to the PG> stupid Microsoft programs insisting on sending mail before PG> checking mail... :-( POP before SMTP authentication is something yo

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Hello Allie, 21 May 2002, 12:11:31, you wrote: > Per Goetterup [PG] wrote: > ... PG>> Still we get a lot of customers with problems... All due to the PG>> stupid Microsoft programs insisting on sending mail before PG>> checking mail... :-( > POP before SMTP authentic

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcus Ohlström [MO] wrote: ... MO> I'm not sure about this, but I've heard from what I consider being MO> a trustworthy source that this might cause trouble, since many MO> SMTP-servers out there does not allow connections from

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 00:54, Melissa Reese wrote: > Another possible work around that has additional advantages - if > you're allowed to install extra software on your work computer; and > if you're not required to send via certain SMTP servers - is to use > your own

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Monday, May 20, 2002, 11:48:55 PM, Chris wrote: > I am using the latter because it is free but there is a 30day trial > for Advanced Direct Remailer and is a superb piece of software. Thanks for the recommendation Chris, I am using ADR on trial now, and it seems to be sending correctly. The o

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Tue, 21 May 2002 09:05:18 +0100 Christopher Taylor-Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote to Thomas F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Others have suggested a local SMTP service which I hadn't even thought > of, so I will investigate and see if any of them will work with my >

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Hello Paul Wilson, On Monday, May 20 2002 at 05:10 PM PDT, you wrote: > I don't know what I am doing wrong. I have gone through the help file > with a fine tooth comb. > Any help would be appreciated. Open ADR/General Settings/Server and check that you have "localhost" listed under "local domai

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, 7:45:21 AM, Thomas wrote: > Workaround: set TB so that it checks your work email every 5 minutes. > AFAIK a POP check leaves the SMTP server open for 10 minutes, so > whenever you want to send anything, a POP check has just occurred > within the time frame.

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Hello Thomas, 21 May 2002, 08:45:21, you wrote: > Workaround: set TB so that it checks your work email every 5 minutes. > AFAIK a POP check leaves the SMTP server open for 10 minutes, so > whenever you want to send anything, a POP check has just occurred > within the time frame.

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Hello Tim, > G... The hassle I have been through keeping 2 ISP PW's in sync > for my wife! No longer You owe me a beer then ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

s your work email every 5 minutes. AFAIK a POP check leaves the SMTP server open for 10 minutes, so whenever you want to send anything, a POP check has just occurred within the time frame. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. "Deine Stereoanlage hat aber vi

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

ials. MAU> Yes, there is. Click on the "Use specific settings" radio button and MAU> you will get where to enter UserID and PW for SMTP authentication. G... The hassle I have been through keeping 2 ISP PW's in sync for my wife! No longer -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] MUA =

Re: Pop/Smtp authentication

Monday, 5/20/02, 5:05 PM Hi Melissa, On Mon, 20 May 2002, at 15:54:00 [GMT -0700] (which was 3:54 PM where I live) you wrote about: 'Pop/Smtp authentication' M> ADR is ridiculously easy to set up. Mercury seemed a bit less M> intuitive when I once had a look at it. I have b

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >