Hello TBUDL,
I believe it has to do something with how I re-map the imap folders to
TB.
Account Properties/ Mail Management/
then Outbox and a pulldown, or write-in, on the right of that.
'For pre-defined mailboxes use these ...
Outbox ... ???
So, on the iMap server, I have 'Sent objec
On Sun, 2009-07-05, Privateofcourse wrote:
> This is what you said on Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:25:52 -0500 your time:
>> You might have to go on the web to your " TBUDL mailing list membership
>> configuration" page and enable the "Mail delivery" option to get your
>> postings sent to you as well as th
Hello Jack,
This is what you said on Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:25:52 -0500 your time:
> You might have to go on the web to your " TBUDL mailing list membership
> configuration" page and enable the "Mail delivery" option to get your
> postings sent to you as well as the rest of the list members.
That's
Hello Privateofcourse,
P> Hi,
P> This is what you said on Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:36:10 -0400 your time:
>>> My hosting service reports no problems after I enquired.
>> This arrived on the list
P> Thanks.
P> After more problems I opted to move my domain elsewhere, and not it's hosted
P> in a dif
Hi
On Saturday 4 July 2009 at 10:59:11 PM, in
, Privateofcourse
wrote:
> I'm recieving mail from the list but mail I send isn't
> getting to the list. Of course if this gets to the list
> it'll be luck.
Luck was with you (-:
--
Best regards,
MFPA
No matter whe
Hi,
This is what you said on Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:36:10 -0400 your time:
>> My hosting service reports no problems after I enquired.
> This arrived on the list
Thanks.
After more problems I opted to move my domain elsewhere, and not it's hosted
in a different part of the world to where it was.
Hello Privateofcourse,
Saturday, June 27, 2009, 10:37:34 PM, you wrote:
P> This is a test. List mail has not been reaching me. Checked the TBUDL
P> archive and replies have been made to my posts...but I haven't had them.
P> Started happening a couple of weeks back. TBUDL mailing list membersh
> Hello TBUDL,
> This is a test. List mail has not been reaching me. Checked the TBUDL
> archive and replies have been made to my posts...but I haven't had them.
> Started happening a couple of weeks back. TBUDL mailing list membership
> configuration page shows a bounce level of 1.0.
> My
Hello TBUDL,
This is a test. List mail has not been reaching me. Checked the TBUDL
archive and replies have been made to my posts...but I haven't had them.
Started happening a couple of weeks back. TBUDL mailing list membership
configuration page shows a bounce level of 1.0.
My hosting serv
Dear Mfpa,
@2-Aug-2007, 20:25 MFPA [M] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MFPA:
>> After you log in, the page has a big box called "add note" above
>> the existing notes.
M> Sorry, Moderators. I realised after sending that I had not
M> trimmed.
Hey... self trouti
Hi
On Thursday 2 August 2007 at 8:17:43 PM, in
, MFPA wrote:
> After you log in, the page has a big box called "add note" above
> the existing notes.
Sorry, Moderators. I realised after sending that I had not
trimmed.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Volv
Mary Bull wrote:
Thank you so much Mary.
Yes, it was an accident to send it to the Bat.
Sandy
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Shahar,
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:33:03 +0200 GMT (24/02/2006, 00:33 +0700 GMT),
Shahar wrote:
>> Thanks. I'm at a loss, though. Maybe someone else can help.
S> Problem solved.
S> I uninstalled and reinstalled.
S> Work like a $1000K :-)
S> Thank you.
Don't thank me - but I'm glad the proble
Hello Thomas
On 2/23/06, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Shahar,
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:05:46 +0200 GMT (23/02/2006, 02:05 +0700 GMT),
> Shahar wrote:
>
> >> >> As can see in the attached files the text in the incoming message is
> >> >> shrieked and is not as the sender
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 at 21:05:46 +0200, Shahar wrote:
>> Still no attachments. I think attachments are not allowed on TBUDL.
>> Can you upload them somewhere?
>
>
> Sure.
> Editor gonfig:
> http://www.geocities.com/savlist/Editor_config.jpg
>
> Text:
> http://www.geocities.com/savlist/Wrap.jpg
>
It
Hello Shahar,
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:05:46 +0200 GMT (23/02/2006, 02:05 +0700 GMT),
Shahar wrote:
>> >> As can see in the attached files the text in the incoming message is
>> >> shrieked and is not as the sender sent it.
>> >> My editor configuration is attached in the second file.
>>
>> Still n
Hello Thomas. Great to see you here as well.
On 2/22/06, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Shahar,
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:02:50 +0200 GMT (22/02/2006, 22:02 +0700 GMT),
> Shahar wrote:
>
> >> As can see in the attached files the text in the incoming message is
> >> shrieked
Hello Shahar,
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:02:50 +0200 GMT (22/02/2006, 22:02 +0700 GMT),
Shahar wrote:
>> As can see in the attached files the text in the incoming message is
>> shrieked and is not as the sender sent it.
>> My editor configuration is attached in the second file.
Still no attachments.
On 2/22/06, Shahar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all.
> I have a problem.
> I'm using ver 3.0.1.33 on Win Xp home SP2
>
> As can see in the attached files the text in the incoming message is
> shrieked and is not as the sender sent it.
> My editor configuration is attached in the second file
a small bottle of olive oil, for sipping. Thank you! (-:
>> Sorry - no can do. These form the bulk of my strategic snack-cache, in
>> readiness for when the skies darken as the forces of evil take to the
>> air...
> You intend shooting TB beta versions with olives? Interestin
Hello Nick Dutton & everyone else,
on 30-Mrz-2005 at 11:08 you (Nick Dutton) wrote:
MM>> For me one jar of black, and one jar of green olives, for a snack, and
MM>> a small bottle of olive oil, for sipping. Thank you! (-:
> Sorry - no can do. These form the bulk of my strate
Hello Mica,
MM> For me one jar of black, and one jar of green olives, for a snack, and a
MM> small bottle of olive oil, for sipping. Thank you! (-:
Sorry - no can do. These form the bulk of my strategic snack-cache, in
readiness for when the skies darken as the forces of evil take to t
>> Like it says in the subject - Sorry.
> This can't be toleranted. Either you send every list member a bottle of
> beer right now (for those that don't want beer, a bar of chocolate), or
> each list member will send you a private test mail.
> Deal? :-)
Deal! Dea
Hello Nick Dutton & everyone else,
on 29-Mrz-2005 at 12:59 you (Nick Dutton) wrote:
> Like it says in the subject - Sorry.
This can't be toleranted. Either you send every list member a bottle of
beer right now (for those that don't want beer, a bar of chocolate), or
each list
Like it says in the subject - Sorry.
--
N.
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Saturday, September 18, 2004, 1:18:08 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Mean,
> --
> Friday, September 17, 2004, 3:28:39 PM, you wrote:
>> Sorry...I checked my inbox again and found that the large mail of 3.7
>> MB had been downloaded and was lyin
Hello Mean,
--
Friday, September 17, 2004, 3:28:39 PM, you wrote:
> Sorry...I checked my inbox again and found that the large mail of 3.7
> MB had been downloaded and was lying in my inbox. So the filter did
> not work at all.
> Filter is setup as
Sorry...I checked my inbox again and found that the large mail of 3.7
MB had been downloaded and was lying in my inbox. So the filter did
not work at all.
Filter is setup as:
Message size Greater than 800KB
Action Delete Message from server, and play a sound
I got the sound and still the
Hello all,
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.123 Beta/Umpteen
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ON Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 11:44:23 AM, you wrote:
PB> Test message
PB>
PB> Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
PB> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi Peter,
We can see you now :-)
But as you can see, you
Test message
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
On Sat 17-Jul-04 5:10pm -0400, Bill McCarthy wrote:
> I'm no longer able to define new shortcuts. If I open the shortcut
> list (Alt-F12) and click on OK, I get "Sorry, you have some errors".
That's solved. I found that I kept a SmartBat note of every shortcut
I
Hallo Bill,
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 17:10:54 -0500GMT (18-7-2004, 0:10 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
BM> One other question. Is there a way to save the shortcut list to a
BM> text file?
Not that I'm aware of. The shortcuts file is saved as shortcut.cfg
(IIRC?), but that's not really readable by
Hello TB User Discussion List,
I'm no longer able to define new shortcuts. If I open the shortcut
list (Alt-F12) and click on OK, I get "Sorry, you have some errors".
If I click on Conflicts, I can see I have none. For Warnings, I have
plenty - but that's normal.
Is the
On Saturday, October 25, 2003, 4:58:22 AM, Pixie wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P> Sorry mods, didn't realize the reply-to was for the list until too
P> late..
Ooops entirely my fault Pixie and Mods... for some reason there
was a wayward folder reply to still set on the folde
Hello TBUDL,
Something happened with my ISP's smtp server.. it did send the
mail, but told me that it didn't.
Again, I'm sorry..
//Markus
--
Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Current
2003-01-24 , 00:09 ,
Sorry folks, instead of to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've sent this
to the list :-
--
Kind regards,
Homesick Mac
www.homesickmac.com
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverst
Hello Andre,
Sunday, November 3, 2002, 1:46:19 PM, you wrote:
AW> Why can't you post to tbot? If you're subscribed you should also be
AW> able to post..
Maybe he means it's possible to post but since he doesn't get mail
from TBOT he doesn't know if it gets there ??
Hopefully Allie will be able
Hello Marck,
Sunday, November 3, 2002, 5:16:48 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Here's another tip (and your cut mark works beautifully BTW)...
Thanks.
>> Best regards,
>> Marymailto:xxx
MDP> I recommend that you remove the mailto link for all public postings.
MD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mary,
@3-Nov-2002, 12:38 -0600 (18:38 UK time) Mary Bull [MB] in
mid:16337465292.20021103123801@;premiernet.net said:
MB> This is a big help to me, too, Dierk. And so much more concisely
MB> done than my long Reply post to David. Which really didn
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, November 3, 2002, 10:52:24 AM, you wrote:
DH> Hello David!
DH>
DH> Let`s refine that a little bit ((comments in double breaks)):
>> Hello, %OFromFName:
DH> ((^ Why that?))
DH> %QUOTES ((that puts the message you reply to in your reply))
DH> %CU
Hello David!
On Sunday, November 3, 2002 at 5:39:09 PM you wrote:
Let`s refine that a little bit ((comments in double breaks)):
> Hello, %OFromFName:
((^ Why that?))
%QUOTES ((that puts the message you reply to in your reply))
%CURSOR ((putting you one line beneath
Hello, Thomas:
Thank you very much. Your instructions were very clear -- and I broke
new ground today creating a special TBUDL Reply template that guards
against inadvertent top-posting.
Here it is, from TBUDL in my address book:
Hello, %OFromFName:
Best regards,
%FromFName
Best wishes,
Da
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, 08:19:56 -0500 GMT (which was 14:19 local
time), DG Raftery Sr. wrote:
DRS> All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else
DRS> experiencing this problem?
The last message I received from tbot is dated Sun, 3 Nov 2002
03:03:59 +0700.
DRS>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <mid:145772801.20021103081956@;myrealbox.com>,
Dg Raftery Sr. [DRS] wrote:'
DRS> All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else
DRS> experiencing this problem?
DRS> Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can'
Hi DG,
on Sun, 3 Nov 2002 08:19:56 -0500GMT (03.11.02, 14:19 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:145772801.20021103081956@;myrealbox.com :
DRS> All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else
DRS> experiencing this problem?
DRS> Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, November 03, 2002
8:17:31 AM
RE: "Sorry for the OT but "
Greetings,
All of a sudden I am receiving nothing from TBOT. Anyone else
experiencing this problem?
Sorry Mr./Mrs. Moderators however I can't post to TBOT to as
Hello David,
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 07:30:20 -0500 GMT (02/11/02, 19:30 +0700 GMT),
David R. Austen wrote:
> This suggests I might want to create a special procedure for all
> replies to messages on this list.
If you do not use any special AB templates (and do not create folder
templates, which shou
Hello David,
Saturday, November 2, 2002, 6:30:20 AM, you wrote:
TM>>> The one you want to watch out for is the 'Cut' mark. I think that is
TM>>> part of the list rules... :-]
DRA> (snip)
DRA> This suggests I might want to create a special procedure for all
DRA> replies to messages on this list.
Friday, November 01, 2002, 7:07:06 PM, you wrote:
TM>> The one you want to watch out for is the 'Cut' mark. I think that is
TM>> part of the list rules... :-]
(snip)
Hello, all:
This suggests I might want to create a special procedure for all
replies to messages on this list.
Please, where do
TM> The one you want to watch out for is the 'Cut' mark. I think that is
TM> part of the list rules... :-]
TM> ,- [People on this list are much happier if you use a "Cut Mark"]
TM> | This is a "special sequence that starts on a new line and consists of
TM> | two dashes (minus signs) and a spa
Hey Vishal,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Personal' was used
to write mid:15311707113.20021031184640@;myrealbox.com
on Thursday, October 31, 2002 at 9:46:40 PM.
8< snip
MAU>> No dessert for you tonight! ;-)
VN> I know. I'm badd :) find me a hole so i can lie down
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 3:37:05 PM, you wrote:
MAU> Hello Vishal,
>> I mistakenly top-posted while replying to someone today.
MAU> Oh my goodness! How could you do something like that! Aren't you
MAU> ashamed of yourself?
MAU> No dessert for you tonight! ;-)
I know. I'm badd :) f
Hello Vishal,
> I mistakenly top-posted while replying to someone today.
Oh my goodness! How could you do something like that! Aren't you
ashamed of yourself?
No dessert for you tonight! ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Hallo Vishal,
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:12:41 -0800GMT (1-11-02, 3:12 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
VN> I mistakenly top-posted while replying to someone today.
Yeah. And though I edited my reply, I forgot to complain about it. ;-)
--
Groetjes, Roelof
I mistakenly top-posted while replying to someone today. Sorry
moderators!
-Vishal
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi pOoTer,
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 00:32:12 +0100, you wrote:
> 1. I am using Kaspersky AV v4.0.5 with the Bat! plug-in and have set up a
> template to send to people who infect me, trouble is it does not seem to
> trigger, any ideas what I am doing wrong please?
>
> The template I am using is the on
Hi All,
Just joined the list and just started using this awesome mail client after
'sacking' Outlook 2000.
I have two newbie questions if you could oblige me
1. I am using Kaspersky AV v4.0.5 with the Bat! plug-in and have set up a template
to send to people who infect me, trouble is it does
--
Rick
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello tbudl,
Sorry about the lack of trim in my last message. I really am working on
this problem!
- --
<>< <>< <><
Best regards,
Frank D. Hubeny
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
Hi tbudl,
Kind regards
--
Dirk Dörr
Using TheBat!1.60g
Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[E
> TB uses two standard threading headers to maintain thread integrity;
> References and In-Reply-To. Some clients use one or t'other. Some
> clients don't use *any*. Messages from the latter group of clients
> will always break a thread.
Hallo Marck,
just saw your message in TBDUL and wanted to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 05, 2002, at 4:59:57 AM PST, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> I don't personally use threading on most emails, but might try it on
> this list.
Eek! Threading - especially with the variety of threading options
provided by TB! - is one of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mike,
@05 May 2002, 20:54:31 +1000 (11:54 UK time) Mike Smith wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hmmm. Is there an explanation for why this seems to be the only
> list where threading (mostly) works? I've tried turning it on on
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Mike Smith wrote:
> Hmmm. Is there an explanation for why this seems to be the only list
> where threading (mostly) works? I've tried turning it on on other
> list folders and its a disaster.
>
Could be possibly related to headers that TB! puts into the email, or
something
At Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 4:44:30 AM, Marck wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Hi Daniel,
> @30 April 2002, 14:32:20 -0400 (19:32 UK time) Daniel Grunberg wrote
> in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I'm sorry, I thought
Hi,
I don't know if my previous mail comes through..
I haven't seen it yet.. but maybe the connection isn't good
right now.. Or I used a wrong address.
What I said in that mail is not true. :-(
Excuse me/ignore
Haico
Current Ver: 1.60h
Good morning Marck,
--->>> Marck D Pearlstone / Thursday, 30.04.2002, 20:44:30
A problem using Opera at First Union Online -- I'm sorry ---
> ...
> Back to the lecture: every time I say this, someone takes exception
> to something I've said with comments l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
@30 April 2002, 14:32:20 -0400 (19:32 UK time) Daniel Grunberg wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm sorry, I thought I was sending the message from my Opera
> folder.
That can mean only one thing
nt it to TBUDL.)
DG>> QUOTE
> I share your frustration with some sites not allowing Opera to browse
> them but what has this to do with TB, exactly? Wrong mailing list,
> perhaps?
I'm sorry, I thought I was sending the message from my Opera folder.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote:
...
DH> Be advised to *not* use the "Bind attachments while sending"
DH> together with "Delete attachment when message is deleted from
DH> Trash" as then you'll lose files.
Wow! I would count that as a show-stopper problem. :
Hello Vlad!
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 11:18:53 AM you wrote:
> 1) When you write new message and attach a file, this file is copied
> to "Attach" folder. This is bad, baut even worse because
Have a look under Account/Properties/Files & Directories ...
Most people here seem to leave attac
I've mentioned some strange behaviors of the v.1.61c
1) When you write new message and attach a file, this file is copied
to "Attach" folder. This is bad, baut even worse because
2) when you delete a message with attachments, these attachments are
not deleted from the "attach" folder. (even afte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 13:54:29 -0800 [ Sun, 24 Mar 2002], Nick Andriash [NA] contributed
this to our collective wisdom:
...
NA> Seems TB inherits the character set of the Senders message when
NA> creating a reply.
Yes, this is what it does unless you over ride this with
Hello Melissa,
On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 12:46:54 PM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to "Testing message sent from Becky (sorry for the new
thread)":
> In the message that came back to me, the two "peculiar characters" were
> missing completely - but I s
Hello Melissa
Sunday, March 24, 2002, 1:09:08 PM, you wrote:
MR> Hello,
MR> This test is in regards to the "Peculiar HTML display (v1.60)" thread
MR> I started. I'm sending this message from Becky email client.
MR> I'm not going to sign this mesasge, so that I can see if the message
MR> below
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 12:31:07 PM PST, Walt Newcomb wrote:
MR>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MR>> Hash: SHA1
MR>> ÿþ
> Except for the List "trailer" this is everything that arrive at this
> end.
This is becoming *very* interesting (a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 12:09:08 PM PST, Melissa Rese wrote:
> The original "mystery test message to myself":
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
Okay... the plot thickens...
I sent that message from Becky, and again, all of t
Hello,
This test is in regards to the "Peculiar HTML display (v1.60)" thread
I started. I'm sending this message from Becky email client.
I'm not going to sign this mesasge, so that I can see if the message
below (the one that showed up with all of the message missing except
for the first two l
Dear readers from 'TB!udl List',
Sorry for this it went out by mistake
Have a nice day :-)
--
best regards
Eddie
Powered by v1.54 Beta/30 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195
PGP (public) is available: www.EddieCastelli.
Hello Dierk Haasis,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001 at 21:28:10 GMT +0200 (which was 9/16/2001
2:28 AM where you think I live) you told to the list :
> Or was it another instance of a folder template gone bad?
No, not Folder Template (I am not using Folder Template on my TB! at
home, I am using Quic
Hello Syafril Hermansyah,
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 at 00:45:59 GMT +0700 (which was 9/16/2001 12:45
AM where you think I live) you told to the list :
[ oh my God, why another portion comes to the list...
I am sorry to moderators and all list, I meant only this portion goes
to the list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Syafril!
On Saturday, September 15, 2001 at 7:45:59 PM you wrote:
> Best regards,
> - Syafril -
Was this message on purpose landed on-list? Or was it another instance of
a folder template gone bad?
- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 00:45:59 +0700GMT (which was 19:45 +0200GMT the day
before where I live), Syafril Hermansyah presented us with these thoughts
about "Moderator Team [ was Re: Sorry, mistaken message]":
SH> Hello Leif Gregory,
S
in simple English/word (I guess, because he lives
in non English Country/Community), no "slang", easy for us (non native
English Speaker) to understand what he is saying/write. Marck, Allie
and you speak English fluently, but sometimes non native speaker as me
can not follow you (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Syafril,
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 at 11:31:24 [GMT +0700], you wrote:
>> Don't worry, they're still asleep. That's why I call us here in
>> Asia "the night shift". ;-)
SH> LOL :-)
SH> How did you know Leif still not coming back to Japan ?
That may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Raj,
On 09 September 2001 at 17:35:21 +0530 (which was 13:05 where I live)
Raj wrote to Marck D Pearlstone on tbudl and made these points:
R> Check this out at your end. Create a test QT Just have the
R> %ISSIGNATURE macro with some text. The
Marck,
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, at 11:27:06 [GMT +0100] (which was 3:57 PM where I live) you
wrote:
>>From where I'm sitting no QT adds the '-- ' without including it as
MDP> hard coded text.
Check this out at your end. Create a test QT Just have the %ISSIGNATURE macro with
some
text. Then open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Raj,
On 09 September 2001 at 09:58:21 +0530 (which was 05:28 where I live)
Raj wrote to Marck D Pearlstone on tbudl and made these points:
MDP>> <<< Here's the problem. The base template itself has to have the
MDP>> '-- ' cut marker in to give t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
On 09 September 2001 at 12:50:19 +0800 (which was 05:50 where I live)
Thomas F wrote to Syafril Hermansyah on TBUDL and made these points:
>>> Don't worry, they're still asleep. That's why I call us here in
>>> Asia "the night shift". ;-
Hello Syafril,
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 11:31:24 +0700 GMT (09/09/2001, 12:31 +0800 GMT),
Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
>> Don't worry, they're still asleep. That's why I call us here in Asia
>> "the night shift". ;-)
SH> LOL :-)
SH> How did you know Leif still not coming back to Japan ?
I haven't heard
Hello Thomas F,
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 at 12:37:26 GMT +0800 (which was 9/9/2001 11:37 AM
where you think I live) you told to the list :
R>> Better stop before the Mod's take this off to OT ;)
> Don't worry, they're still asleep. That's why I call us here in Asia
> "the night shift". ;-)
LOL :-)
Hello Raj,
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 09:54:37 +0530 GMT (09/09/2001, 12:24 +0800 GMT),
Raj wrote:
R> Better stop before the Mod's take this off to OT ;)
Don't worry, they're still asleep. That's why I call us here in Asia
"the night shift". ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! B
Marck,
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 17:19:39 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:49 PM where I live) you
wrote:
MDP> <<< Here's the problem. The base template itself has to have the '-- '
MDP> cut marker in to give the signature somewhere to live.
My question still remain same. Why was the same not added by
Thomas,
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, at 12:02:41 [GMT +0800] (which was 9:32 AM where I live) you
wrote:
R>> In other words the user is (and has to be) responsible for checking
R>> the message / recipients before sending the message.
TF> Yes. I wouldn't want it any other way, or I'd be assimilated.
TF>
Hello Raj,
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 17:54:34 +0530 GMT (08/09/2001, 20:24 +0800 GMT),
Raj wrote:
R> In other words the user is (and has to be) responsible for checking
R> the message / recipients before sending the message.
Yes. I wouldn't want it any other way, or I'd be assimilated.
This is email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Raj,
On 08 September 2001 at 20:46:25 +0530 (which was 16:16 where I live)
Raj wrote to Marck D Pearlstone on tbudl and made these points:
R> Then I created a template for the 'Account' as follows.
R> Hello %TOFName,
R> %Cursor
R>
Marck,
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 14:36:10 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:06 PM where I live) you
wrote:
MDP> :-) all of my "sign offs" contain the %ISSIGNATURE macro. When you use
MDP> that, the replacement is auto-magical.
Back with some doubt. I created three two QT's for my signature as given below.
Marck,
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 14:36:10 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:06 PM where I live) you
wrote:
MDP> :-) all of my "sign offs" contain the %ISSIGNATURE macro. When you use
MDP> that, the replacement is auto-magical.
Thanks and will get back to the you (& forum) after I have done my bit of
exper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Raj,
On 08 September 2001 at 18:49:07 +0530 (which was 14:19 where I live)
Raj wrote to Marck D Pearlstone on tbudl and made these points:
R> From you mail (the last line quoted above) I get a feeling you do
R> not select the sign off. If so wha
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
