Hello Ming-Li,
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 18:13:55 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, August 18, 2000, 8:13:55 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Ming-Li wrote:
Hello %OFROMNAME,
On%SETPATTREGEXP="(?m-s)^Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))"%REGEXPMATCH="%HEADERS"
Hello tracer,
Thursday, August 17, 2000, 1:55:55 AM, you wrote:
seems to me that it does make sense.
It sure does tracer. I guess I have to put the blame on my bad command
of English. What I _think_ I say, is not necessarily always what I
_mean_ to say. Sorry about that. I think you guys
This message: 18/08/2000 10:50 GMT.
Hello Ming-Li,
For experimental purposes I had a play with my reply templates and
as can be seen from this reply, putting %cursor before %quote
results in the desired effect.
A copy of my template for reference is appended below.
A reminder of
Hello Jan-Arild Løkstad,
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000 12:24:00 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, August 18, 2000, 5:24:00 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote:
Hello tracer,
Thursday, August 17, 2000, 1:55:55 AM, you wrote:
seems to me that it does make sense.
It sure
Hi Marck, Tracer, Tony,
For experimental purposes I had a play with my reply templates
and as can be seen from this reply, putting %cursor before
%quote results in the desired effect.
Thank you all for trying it out for me, and I've found the culprit.
It's all my fault. Marck might
Hello Jan-Arild Løkstad,
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:13:17 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, August 17, 2000, 2:13:17 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote:
Hello Curtis,
Wednesday, August 16, 2000, 1:11:02 PM, you wrote:
Makes me wonder if where the %cursor macro is
Hi tracer,
seems to me that it does make sense. You position the cursor, then
below that the quote. if you put quotes first, it likely will
produce the quote and then py putting the cursor, move everything
before the cursor position up, After all, the cursor tells the
system where you want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ming-Li,
On 18 August 2000 at 18:13:55 GMT -0700 (which was 02:13 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Strange things when replying":
ML What it doesn't make sense to me is if I put %cursor
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, August 16, 2000, 5:57:10 AM, you wrote:
Always, but not with all messages. The prob may be reproducible if
the messages does not fill a screen, but some longer messages are
effected too.
Well, all I can say is that it does here. I tested this with 120
messages last
Hi Jan-Arild,
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 11:01:55 +0200GMT (16/08/2000, 17:01 +0800GMT),
Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote:
JAL As you will see, the only difference between the two is that I have
JAL removed the %Cursor-macro in the latter -and you know what? The
JAL problem is gone. Completely.
Wow, I'm
Hello Jan-Arild,
On Wednesday, August 16, 2000 at 11:01:55 GMT +0200 (which was 2:01 AM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
As you will see, the only difference between the two is that I have
removed the %Cursor-macro in the latter -and you know what? The
problem is gone. Completely.
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 11:01:55 +0200, Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote:
JAL My original reply template looked like this:
snip
JAL %Quotes
JAL %Cursor
snip
JAL I changed it to look like this:
snip
JAL %Quotes
snip
JAL As you will see, the only difference between the two is that I have
JAL
Hello Jan-Arild Løkstad,
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000 22:50:33 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, August 16, 2000, 3:50:33 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote:
Hello Januk,
Tuesday, August 15, 2000, 8:08:12 AM, you wrote:
In essence, what I found is that the scroll
Hello Curtis,
Wednesday, August 16, 2000, 1:11:02 PM, you wrote:
Makes me wonder if where the %cursor macro is placed is what creates
the problem, rather than whether or not you use the %cursor macro at
all.
You are pretty good at wondering Curtis :) I did put the %Cursor macro
back into my
Hello Jan-Arild,
Monday, August 14, 2000, 10:44:47 AM, you wrote:
JAL Hello All,
JAL Pressing the "Reply"-button opens up the "Message Editor Window" with
JAL the quote prefix preceding each lineas if you didn't know :) The
JAL strange thing is that only the last 4-5
Hello Januk,
Tuesday, August 15, 2000, 8:08:12 AM, you wrote:
In essence, what I found is that the scroll bars are calculated on
the amount of text in the message. Have you noticed if you go to
the beginning of these replies, then the text all fits into one
screen?
It doesn't seem to make
Hello Graham,
Tuesday, August 15, 2000, 8:16:29 AM, you wrote:
Exactly the same here Jan-Arild. I wonder why??
A poor consolation I know, but you are not alone feeling this way
Graham. I am totally lost.
What is even more frustrating is that I am not in possession of the
special knowledge
Hi Jan-Arild,
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000 22:50:33 +0200GMT (16/08/2000, 04:50 +0800GMT),
Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote:
JAL It doesn't seem to make any difference whether the original message
JAL contains 10 or 500 lines of text. The same thing happens every time -
JAL i.e all the text (except from the last
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
Responding to your article on Sunday, August 13, 2000 at 12:21:19 GMT
+0100 (which was 13/08/2000 18:21 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
[ ... ]
MDP I agree that this is not always the case. The "retry queue" has had a
MDP mention in this thread and I can state what
Hello All,
Pressing the "Reply"-button opens up the "Message Editor Window" with
the quote prefix preceding each lineas if you didn't know :) The
strange thing is that only the last 4-5 lines of the message to which
I am replying is visible in the editor. The rest of
Hi Jan-Arild,
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:44:47 +0200GMT (14/08/2000, 17:44 +0800GMT),
Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote:
JAL The strange thing is that only the last 4-5 lines of the message
JAL to which I am replying is visible in the editor. The rest of the
JAL original message, and also the scrollbar!, has
Hello Thomas,
Monday, August 14, 2000, 12:08:31 PM, you wrote:
Yep; not with every message but a selected few. I have not foudn a
pattern.
Neither have I, not in TB!, but I have found something that _might_ be
related. I am no computer guru so the following may sound stupid, and
is just a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jan-Arild,
Monday, August 14, 2000, 15:00:56, you wrote:
JAL _Very_ stable system. Not one single crash (believe it or not) ever
JAL since I installed Win98 in august 1998.
It's Linux pretending to be Windowsg
Seriously though that is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
Monday, August 14, 2000, 16:01:51, you wrote:
TF A.G.P. S3 Trio 3D/2X Video Accelerator. Is that it?
TF I also found a file called VGA.DRV in the c:\windows\system directory,
TF but don't know how to find out more.
Uh huh. That's
Hello Thomas,
Monday, August 14, 2000, 5:01:51 PM, you wrote:
In all the user manuals that came with my PC, one is entitled:
A.G.P. S3 Trio 3D/2X Video Accelerator. Is that it?
I also found a file called VGA.DRV in the c:\windows\system
directory, but don't know how to find out more.
I'm
Hello Jamie,
Monday, August 14, 2000, 4:54:14 PM, you wrote:
It's Linux pretending to be Windowsg
Hehe. I have Linux installed on one of my harddrives, so maybe Linux
is the "source of infection".
Seriously though that is a very weird problem that I have never
encountered.
It sure is
Hello Nick,
Monday, August 14, 2000, 4:35:56 PM, you wrote:
Time to come back to this side of the looking glass, Alice.
LOL. It sounds like a fairytale, I know, but I am in fact telling the
truth.
I have absolutely no idea why my system doesn't crash, but there has
to be something seriously
Hi Thomas,
JD TO find what version it's running press [win] + [break]
Done.
JD Choose device manager.
Here I got stuck. How do you spell that in Chinese? - Just kidding.
Can you describe the icon?
LOL. It's called "¸Ë¸mºÞ²zû", if you can find the "pattern". I'm
not sure about the icon
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:03:47 +0200, Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote:
JAL BTW, if Curtis is "stupid" enough to read this :)
Sure right!
JAL , I should like to take the opportunity to congratulate him as a
JAL moderator.
Thanks.:-)
--
-=A. Curtis Martin=-Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA
Using TB!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi TBUDL,
Chuck wrote:
snip
CM Case in point, Gerd, I only received your message, just now,
CM second-hand via Thomas' reply; I've yet to receive your original post.
CM It's been happening to me, only with this list out of many high-volume
CM
Gerd,
Regarding your message dated: 13 August 2000...
GE I can give some details to this problem: it seemes as if it has sometimes to do
GE with Mark R. Harding's msgs (Sorry, no offence, Mark).
No offence taken! I have an idea though although I'm not sure how it
explains the problem ...
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gerd,
On 13 August 2000 at 11:45:42 GMT +0200 (which was 10:45 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Replies arrive before originals (was:Re: Strange error message
when sending)":
GE I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 13 August 2000 at 12:07:35 GMT +0100 (which was 12:07 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Replies arrive before originals (was:Re: Strange error message when sending)":
MRH ... my
Hallo Marck,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:46:39 +0100 GMT (13/08/2000, 19:46 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
[...]
MRH Received: from mango.callnet0800.com [212.67.144.19] by smtp.callnet0800.com
MRH (SMTPD32-5.05) id A17A1222021E; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:07:38 +0100
MDP This transit took only
Marck,
Regarding your message dated: 13 August 2000...
MDP In truth, time difference in seconds can't be really be relied upon. I
MDP once saw someone sneering at PC clock synchronizers on this list but,
MDP IMHO, such things are a necessity for clarity and to ensure that we
MDP are all
Hallo Mark,
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 13:27:23 +0100 GMT (13/08/2000, 20:27 +0800 GMT),
Mark R Harding wrote:
MRH In case anyone is interested, "Dimension 4" is available here...
MRH http://www.accessone.com/~thinkman/dimension4/
I use AboutTime. I used anacron for a while but was unhappy -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
on Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:07:35 +0100 GMT
your local time, which was 13.08.2000, 13:07:35 (GMT+0200) my local time,
you wrote about "Replies arrive before originals (was:Re: Strange error message when
sending)":
snip
MRH For inte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
on Sun, 13 Aug 2000 12:21:19 +0100 GMT
your local time, which was 13.08.2000, 13:21:19 (GMT+0200) my local time,
you wrote about "Replies arrive before originals (was:Re: Strange error message when
sending)":
snip
MDP IOW
version.
JD increased.
Yep, that's what I did. And so far, everything is going fine. I've
sent a ton of mail and haven't gotten that message yet. It is strange
that I only started getting the message last Wednesday night. I figure
though, that since I'm using Win-doze 98, these weird kind of things
Hello Gerd Ewald,
Responding to your article on Saturday, August 12, 2000 at 15:53:11 GMT
+0200 (which was 12/08/2000 20:53 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
CB One odd note, when I sent my e-mail to TBUDL I didn't get that
CB message. [the only time I didn't] I knew there was something "magical"
CB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christine,
on Sat, 12 Aug 2000 08:55:17 -0400 GMT
your local time, which was 12.08.2000, 14:55:17 (GMT+0200) my local time,
you wrote about "Strange error message when sending":
snip
CB One odd note, when I sent my e-mail to TBUDL I
Hello Christine,
Friday, August 11, 2000, 6:46:35 PM, you wrote:
CB "Exception EInvalidOperation in module THEBAT.EXE at 0005AD5B. Control
CB 'eMsg' has no parent window."
CB After I click "OK" in the message box, the program closes out. When I
CB re-open it, I find that the e-mail has been
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:53:11 +0200, Gerd Ewald wrote:
GE I know what you mean: the last few days I receive replies before the
GE original msg is transmitted ! Sometimes I have to wait two days for
GE the original message.
GE Is it only me having that problem or is it a ML-server problem ?
Hallo Gerd,
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:53:11 +0200 GMT (12/08/2000, 21:53 +0800 GMT),
Gerd Ewald wrote:
GE I know what you mean: the last few days I receive replies before the original
GE msg is transmitted ! Sometimes I have to wait two days for the original message.
GE Is it only me having that
On Saturday, August 12, 2000 at 11:45 AM or thereabouts, Thomas
Fernandez wrote the following about Replies arrive before originals
(was:Re: Strange error message when sending):
Thomas On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:53:11 +0200 GMT (12/08/2000, 21:53
Thomas +0800 GMT), Gerd Ewald wrote:
GE I know what
Hello All,
Yesterday I wrote the following and only one of you replied.
FvV I just noticed that ctrl up and ctrl down moves to the previous or
FvV next message based upon the date and time the message was received.
FvV Isn't this strange? I have sorted my messages on creation time.
Am I
On Sat, 5 Aug 2000 13:26:46 +0200, Fred van Veen wrote:
FvV I just noticed that ctrl up and ctrl down moves to the previous or
FvV next message based upon the date and time the message was received.
FvV Isn't this strange? I have sorted my messages on creation time.
FvV Am I the only one who
Hello All,
On 5-8-2000 13:41:37, Curtis wrote:
C On Sat, 5 Aug 2000 13:26:46 +0200, Fred van Veen wrote:
FvV I just noticed that ctrl up and ctrl down moves to the previous or
FvV next message based upon the date and time the message was received.
FvV Isn't this strange? I have sorted my
Hi Fred,
It doesn't happen if I have selected the view folder message list,
but if not selected, Ctrl up goes down and Ctrl down goes up.
Sorry Fred, I tried, but can't make it happen.
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1
--
work. Strange.
--
Fred
It might look like I'm doing nothing, but at the cellular level I'm
really quite busy.
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000 07:47:10 +0200, Fred van Veen wrote:
FvV I just noticed that ctrl up and ctrl down moves to the previous or
FvV next message based upon the date and time the message was received.
FvV Isn't this strange? I have sorted my messages on creation time.
FvV Further, when sorted
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000 07:47:10 0200, Fred van Veen wrote:
FvV I just noticed that ctrl up and ctrl down moves to the previous or
FvV next message based upon the date and time the message was received.
FvV Isn't this strange? I have sorted my messages on creation time.
FvV Further, when
Hello All,
On 4-8-00 13:50:12, fred wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000 07:47:10 0200, Fred van Veen wrote:
FvV I just noticed that ctrl up and ctrl down moves to the previous or
FvV next message based upon the date and time the message was received.
FvV Isn't this strange? I have sorted my
Hello all,
I just noticed that ctrl up and ctrl down moves to the previous or
next message based upon the date and time the message was received.
Isn't this strange? I have sorted my messages on creation time.
Further, when sorted last created message first, ctrl up goes down
(the previous
th...
without any improvement.
Fact is: When sending mail to the same address with the same account
settings but a different mail-client it works...!
Strange thing... Any advice where to look anybody?
Thanks.
--
Best,
Wolfgang Armbruster
Moldex-Metric AGCo KG W
Hi Wolfgang,
On 04 July 2000 at 08:50:09 GMT +0200 (which was 07:50 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "strange thing...":
WA Lately I've found that while sending "internal mail" to one
WA specific address, the recipien
Hello Marck,
On Dienstag, 4. Juli 2000, 10:31:43 you wrote:
MDP On 04 July 2000 at 08:50:09 GMT +0200 (which was 07:50 where I
MDP live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
MDP of "strange thing...":
MDP ... erm - in the filters of the receiver's email c
Hi Wolfgang,
On 04 July 2000 at 11:03:12 GMT +0200 (which was 10:03 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "strange thing...":
MDP ... erm - in the filters of the receiver's email client (you
MDP don't say what that is).
WA it's OE5 and th
Hello all,
Tuesday, July 04, 2000, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
On 04 July 2000 at 11:03:12 GMT +0200 (which was 10:03 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "strange thing...":
MDP ... erm - in the filters of the receiver's email clien
Hi Marek,
On 04 July 2000 at 11:37:43 GMT +0200 (which was 10:37 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "strange thing...":
Any-one else agree or disagree on this point? It just seems like
logic to me.
MM I have meny friends with OE5 and
same settings ain't no
problem
Remains strange this one...
--
Best,
Wolfgang Armbruster
Moldex-Metric AGCo KG Walddorfhaeslach
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a
Hi Ming-Li,
On 04 July 2000 at 02:37:28 GMT -0700 (which was 10:37 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "strange thing...":
it's OE5 and there aren't any filters... Sending mail with another
mail-client ain't no problem...
ML No
Hi Wolfgang,
On 04 July 2000 at 12:21:07 GMT +0200 (which was 11:21 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "The strange thing in detail":
WA here comes an example of a mail received in the trash folder
WA
Received: from
Hi,
On Tuesday, July 04, 2000, 11:37:28 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
I remember at least some versions of OE came with pre-configured
junk mail filters. (It caused a small fuss in the news for it turned
out MS put some of its competitors' domain in them.) Could that be
it?
Well, I think Ming-Li
Hi Wolfgang,
Received: from sekundant (192.168.1.20)
by ntservoe with MERCUR-SMTP/POP3/IMAP4-Server (v3.20.01 WP-7962639)
for ngoeksu@mmmp; Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:06:22 +0200
I noticed you're using a combined smtp/pop3/imap4 server. What
are you using internally for mail
Hi,
On Tuesday, July 04, 2000, Ming-Li wrote:
As far as I can tell, the message example you gave
us is very standard. [...]
Not completely, but read on.
[...]
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.45 Beta/4) Personal
which is the only one unique to TB! as I know.
I don't think this would really
Hi,
On Tuesday, July 04, 2000, 11:03:12 AM, Wolfgang Armbruster wrote:
it's OE5 and there aren't any filters...
OE5 or OE5.1, Mac or PC?
Both, OE5 and OE5.1, have no Junk filtering according to the READMEs.
There's one known bug where OE5 for Mac discards received messages
(when memory is
the world:
@moldex-europe.com
And another one for sending mail internally: @mmmp
- It's just _one_ internal email address (and client respectively)
which shows this strange behaviour. I may send internal mail from my
internal account to anybody else within the LAN _without_ any
problems...!
- And it has
Hi Wolfgang,
On 04 July 2000 at 15:08:39 GMT +0200 (which was 14:08 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "The strange thing in detail":
WA - It's just _one_ internal email address (and client respectively)
WA which shows this strange behavi
Hello Wolfgang Armbruster,
Responding to your article on Tuesday, July 04, 2000 at 15:08:39 GMT
+0200 (which was 04/07/2000 20:08 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
ML I noticed you're using a combined smtp/pop3/imap4 server. What are
ML you using internally for mail collection? POP3 or IMAP4? Am
Hello TBUDL,
OK, it's not strange anymore:
I had another close look at the OE5-client. It's true that there
were no email-rules/filters...
But there had been an entry in the "list of blocked senders" - which
I took out and now it works...
Nobody knows who set
these points on the subject
of "strange thing...":
Any-one else agree or disagree on this point? It just seems like
logic to me.
MM I have meny friends with OE5 and manytimes they told me, they didn't
MM received my mail. They found it in Trash then. OE trashed it
MM aut
Hi tracer,
On 04 July 2000 at 18:13:28 GMT +0700 (which was 12:13 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "strange thing...":
... I know I send mail to a lot of OE5 users who have never
reported this issue.
t Mark, how can they if they
Hello Bat-Users,
recently I've discovered something, what I would call a strange
behavior of The Bat!
I've got an Folder with special e-mail templates and a special
reply-to entry. When I'm in that folder and I just click the "New
Mail"-Button, I get an empty mail, obvious
Hi Michael,
On 21 May 2000 at 17:59:56 GMT +0200 (which was 16:59 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Strange Reply-To Behavior":
I've got an Folder with special e-mail templates and a special
reply-to entry.
snip
Can anyone verify th
Hallo Marck,
Sunday, May 21, 2000, 6:31:32 PM, you wrote:
MDP It may be that the address in question is one which has an AB
MDP template.
I had thought about that. But it wasn't the case...
--
Regards,
Michael
---
Michael Hurler
Friday, April 14, 2000, 7:38:38 PM, Thomas wrote:
Right. But the customer *wants* it as an attachment. In this part of
the world, the service provider follows the customer's request, not
the other way round. ;-)
Both customer and provider follow standards or nothing gets done. That is
Hallo Steve,
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:00:28 -0700 GMT (17.04.2000, 23:00 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
Right. But the customer *wants* it as an attachment. In this part of
the world, the service provider follows the customer's request, not
the other way round. ;-)
SL Both customer and
Hi Thomas,
On 15 April 2000 at 11:00:31 GMT +0800 (which was 04:00 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "strange feature request":
... I think Marck is off-line,
Attending to visiting family. Also subject to GMT (well, DST) and va
hallo TBUDL!
more and more i send scanned attachements via email, how about a small
scan-plugin, nothing complicated, twain-interface, greyscale,
autmoatic gif-compression...
opinions?
PAT
--
vcard/LDAP/PGP: http://dresden-online.com/~perler/identity.html
PGP fingerprint: DAC6 2FDA 1ED7 AD55
Hello all,
Friday, April 14, 2000, Patrick Erler wrote:
hallo TBUDL!
more and more i send scanned attachements via email, how about a small
scan-plugin, nothing complicated, twain-interface, greyscale,
autmoatic gif-compression...
opinions?
wait for v2.x and script support :-)
--
Bye
Friday, April 14, 2000, 8:21:13 AM, Patrick wrote:
more and more i send scanned attachements via email, how about a small
scan-plugin, nothing complicated, twain-interface, greyscale,
autmoatic gif-compression...
opinions?
Stop sending them in a format which is unsuited to the task.
hallo Steve!
on Friday, April 14, 2000, 5:50:10 PM, you wrote:
SL Friday, April 14, 2000, 8:21:13 AM, Patrick wrote:
more and more i send scanned attachements via email, how about a small
scan-plugin, nothing complicated, twain-interface, greyscale,
autmoatic gif-compression...
opinions?
Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:12:32 AM, Patrick wrote:
gif = png;
better?
FTP. Better.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:38:07 AM, Patrick wrote:
ok. so please explain a 40 year old woman in simple words, how to
fetch a file from a ftp-server. standard windows-nt configuration
please.
Sure.
Click here: ftp://ftp.rpglink.com/pub/dosjoe/djoe101.zip
That simple enough?
--
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:38:07 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote:
SL FTP. Better.
ok. so please explain a 40 year old woman in simple words, how to
fetch a file from a ftp-server. standard windows-nt configuration
please.
ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta/TB142b17.zip
hallo Steve!
on Friday, April 14, 2000, 6:48:28 PM, you wrote:
SL Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:38:07 AM, Patrick wrote:
ok. so please explain a 40 year old woman in simple words, how to
fetch a file from a ftp-server. standard windows-nt configuration
please.
SL Sure.
SL Click here:
hallo Allie!
on Friday, April 14, 2000, 6:49:33 PM, you wrote:
AM On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:38:07 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote:
SL FTP. Better.
ok. so please explain a 40 year old woman in simple words, how to
fetch a file from a ftp-server. standard windows-nt configuration
please.
AM
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:59:13 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote:
SL Click here: ftp://ftp.rpglink.com/pub/dosjoe/djoe101.zip
:)
ok, so lets have a plugin which makes this as simply for /me/ as drag
'n droping the attachement on to the message, ok?
There are many ftp programs out there that
Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:59:13 AM, Patrick wrote:
ok, so lets have a plugin which makes this as simply for /me/ as drag
'n droping the attachement on to the message, ok?
Why? If you're the one creating the attachment it is a simple matter of
placing it somewhere accessible and making the
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:05:42 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote:
dear mister erler!
we still waiting for your offer. you said its better to not attach
them to the msg but we should click on the words above. all we got is
this:
http://ftp.dresden-online.com/~perler/files/shot.gif
as we see you
Friday, April 14, 2000, 10:05:42 AM, Patrick wrote:
we still waiting for your offer. you said its better to not attach
them to the msg but we should click on the words above. all we got is
this:
http://ftp.dresden-online.com/~perler/files/shot.gif
Then don't screw up the URL. Click on
hallo Steve!
on Friday, April 14, 2000, 7:11:29 PM, you wrote:
SL Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:59:13 AM, Patrick wrote:
ok, so lets have a plugin which makes this as simply for /me/ as drag
'n droping the attachement on to the message, ok?
SL Why? If you're the one creating the attachment
hallo Allie!
on Friday, April 14, 2000, 7:18:00 PM, you wrote:
AM On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:05:42 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote:
dear mister erler!
we still waiting for your offer. you said its better to not attach
them to the msg but we should click on the words above. all we got is
this:
Friday, April 14, 2000, 10:24:59 AM, Patrick wrote:
when i send an attachement i'm joe user as everyone else. and as joe user i
asked for a feature. you wouldn't implement it because you think that your
way of doing things should be my way too. so do.
Incorrect. I don't add features that
hallo Steve!
on Friday, April 14, 2000, 7:32:34 PM, you wrote:
SL Friday, April 14, 2000, 10:24:59 AM, Patrick wrote:
when i send an attachement i'm joe user as everyone else. and as joe user i
asked for a feature. you wouldn't implement it because you think that your
way of doing things
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:11:29 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, April 15, 2000, 12:11:29 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:59:13 AM, Patrick wrote:
ok, so lets have a plugin which makes this as simply for /me/ as drag
'n
Hallo Allie,
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:10:35 -0500 GMT (15.04.2000, 01:10 +0800 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM I select my geocities ftp server space link by double-clicking on
AM an icon. The file on the server appear in one window. I then navigate to
AM the desired file in the other window
Hallo Steve,
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:17:54 -0700 GMT (15.04.2000, 01:17 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
as we see you are not able to send a simple attachement, we decided
to give the 3.500.000 $ order to you competitor.
SL I don't know of a single business that would do that based on one
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:17:54 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, April 15, 2000, 12:17:54 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Friday, April 14, 2000, 10:05:42 AM, Patrick wrote:
we still waiting for your offer. you said its better to not attach
them to
401 - 500 of 534 matches
Mail list logo
