Re[2]: Adding a date to AB entries. Any suggestion?

>> I would appreciate any imaginative suggestion on how to achieve this. M> What my filters must do as action is: M> -Export message to plain text file D:\Temp\add.csv M> With 'append' option selected M> And with template = %FROMADDR, %DATESHORT, M> I o

Re: Adding a date to AB entries. Any suggestion?

Hello MAU, > I would appreciate any imaginative suggestion on how to achieve this. I got it. This happens to me many times. I give up on something, I ask for help and then is when I find the solution myself. It is easier that I thought. What my filters must do as action is: -Export message

Adding a date to AB entries. Any suggestion?

doing so. I'm looking at the possibility of instead of adding addresses directly to AB, adding them to a text file (obviously automagically) that I could then once a day manually import into the AB, but I haven't found any way of doing this either. I would appreciate any imaginative suggest

Re: Suggestion: "select below to signature divider"

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:36:43 +0200, Peter Fjelsten wrote: > I get mail from a lot of people who have huge problems with > quoting correctly (i.e. top-posting), so I find myself constantly > selecting a lot of quoted text below the cursor and hitting delete > to delete all the bottom quotes. [Snip

Re: Suggestion: "select below to signature divider"

Chris, On 15-04-2004 15:47, you [C] wrote in : >> How [do] the rest of you handle this problem? Ouch! :) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 2.05 Beta/16 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.0

Re: Suggestion: "select below to signature divider"

Peter Fjelsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ 15-Apr-2004 9:36:43 AM "Suggestion: "select below to signature divider"" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > How [do] the rest of you handle this problem? 1. Get annoyed 2. Reply with all the text included 3. Move stuff around 4. A

Suggestion: "select below to signature divider"

TheBat-users/beta testers, I get mail from a lot of people who have huge problems with quoting correctly (i.e. top-posting), so I find myself constantly selecting a lot of quoted text below the cursor and hitting delete to delete all the bottom quotes. I do this with times "n" until my sig

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:08:39 -0600GMT (16-2-2004, 7:08 +0100, where I live), Ken Green wrote: KG> Note that "toggling" is temporary - turning auto-format on or off from KG> the what you have as default is for that message only. TB returns to KG> your "normal" setting after you send that message (

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

Henk de Bruijn wrote: > I knew the auto-format option but had put that off because of various > reasons. But toggling works great, thanks! It took me awhile to discover auto-format. Maybe this should be something included in the install notes - or more easily found in the manual? Not sure if thi

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

Hello Marck, On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:14:59 +GMT (15-2-2004, 21:14 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MDP> @15-Feb-2004, 19:33 +0100 (15-Feb 18:33 UK time) Henk de Bruijn MDP> [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: ... HDB>> Is it just a matter of toggling while typing in a new message H

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

Dear Henk, @15-Feb-2004, 19:33 +0100 (15-Feb 18:33 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: DG>>> Isn't this what "Auto-format" does? HDB> ... MDP>> It's there as a toggle on Ctrl+Shift+F and I just toggle it on/off MDP>> at will and MicroEd rules. HDB> Is it just

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

Hello Marck, On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:31:44 +GMT (15-2-2004, 15:31 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MDP> @15-Feb-2004, 08:20 -0600 (15-Feb 14:20 UK time) Dave Gorman [DG] in MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to zParticle: >>> MicroEd could rule. But it needs soft wrapping. DG>> Isn't this what

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

Dear Dave, @15-Feb-2004, 08:20 -0600 (15-Feb 14:20 UK time) Dave Gorman [DG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to zParticle: >> MicroEd could rule. But it needs soft wrapping. DG> Isn't this what "Auto-format" does? Yes. I keep telling people this, but nobody wants to get it and I get fed up tryin

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

Hello zParticle, Friday, February 13, 2004, 6:07:51 PM, you wrote: > MicroEd could rule. But it needs soft wrapping. Isn't this what "Auto-format" does? -- Dave Using The Bat! v2.04 RC/3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current ver

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

Wayne Howard wrote: >>After playing with the settings, I did not even realize that there is >>another non-html editor available. Clearly, there is much more for me >>to learn about The Bat!! Does the Windows plain text editor do any of >>what you are asking for with the Microed editor? (I just sta

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

Hello Wayne, On Saturday, February 14, 2004, at 10:52:44 AM, you wrote re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd: WH> After playing with the settings, I did not even realize that there is WH> another non-html editor available. Clearly, there is much more for me WH> to learn about The Bat!!

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

Hello Wayne, On Saturday, February 14, 2004, at 12:59:35 AM, you wrote re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd: WH> This is a great idea. I hate this especially when I cut and past WH> something (or add text) and have to reformat where the text is WH> wrapping. I think TheBat! would win a

Re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd

Hello zParticle, On Friday, February 13, 2004, at 7:07:51 PM, you wrote re: A simple suggestion for MicroEd: z> MicroEd could rule. But it needs soft wrapping. z> Note that I said the EDITOR needs soft wrapping. The messages should z> always go out hard wrapped: this is the Internet

A simple suggestion for MicroEd

MicroEd could rule. But it needs soft wrapping. Note that I said the EDITOR needs soft wrapping. The messages should always go out hard wrapped: this is the Internet standard for plain text, and serves to keep things consistent and readable regardless which mail client you're using. The problem

Re[2]: A new feature suggestion...

On Tuesday, January 27, 2004 at 11:41:50 PM, you wrote: > Hello Marten, >> But how about if it were an optional setting? That is you could set it >> be operational or not? > I have no problem when features are optional or configurable. That way, > both you and I could be happy :) Muy bien - exc

Re: A new feature suggestion...

Hello Marten, > But how about if it were an optional setting? That is you could set it > be operational or not? I have no problem when features are optional or configurable. That way, both you and I could be happy :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3

Re[2]: A new feature suggestion...

On Tuesday, January 27, 2004 at 9:31:15 PM, you wrote: > Hello Admin, >> Similarly, when account is collapsed and mailboxes not visible, a >> marker indicating the fact as above is shown against the account. >> >> This would make my life so much easier with multiple (30+) accounts >> with many r

Re: A new feature suggestion...

Hello Admin, > Similarly, when account is collapsed and mailboxes not visible, a > marker indicating the fact as above is shown against the account. > > This would make my life so much easier with multiple (30+) accounts > with many requests from clients for amendments etc to their web > sites.

A new feature suggestion...

I have suggested that: When a message has a colour group ascribed to it and/or is flagged, that there should be a marker on the accounts list on the left so that when the mailbox is closed it is indicated against that mailbox as such. Similarly, when account is collapsed and mailboxes not visible

Re: The Bat! Christmas Discount Suggestion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:48:35 + (11:48 AM here), Martin Webster [MW] wrote in : MW> Returning to Kevin's original post... it would be improper to buy MW> a discounted licence for someone else off the back of your

Re: The Bat! Christmas Discount Suggestion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas, On 21 December 2003, 23:12 +0700 ( 16:12 local time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TF>>> But that is possible! Purchase a key by using your credit card, TF>>> and forward the key to the lucky receiver of your gif

Re: The Bat! Christmas Discount Suggestion

Hello Kevin, On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 10:48:06 -0500 GMT (21/12/2003, 22:48 +0700 GMT), Kevin Coates wrote: TF>> But that is possible! Purchase a key by using your credit card, TF>> and forward the key to the lucky receiver of your gift on TF>> Christmas. > Is that legal and would they then be qualif

Re: The Bat! Christmas Discount Suggestion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:32:41 +0700 (10:32 AM here), Thomas Fernandez [TF] wrote in : >> What I would like to see is a discount for current registered users >> so they can buy discounted copies of The Bat! for Christm

Re: The Bat! Christmas Discount Suggestion

Hello Kevin, On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 10:19:59 -0500 GMT (21/12/2003, 22:19 +0700 GMT), Kevin Coates wrote: > What I would like to see is a discount for current registered users > so they can buy discounted copies of The Bat! for Christmas gifts to > their friends and associates. But that is possible

RE:The Bat! Christmas Discount Suggestion

Hello Kevin, Sunday, December 21, 2003, 4:19:59 PM, you wrote: > The Christmas Special letter seems to be geared towards current users > upgrading their copy of The Bat!. > Many of us have already done so. What I would like to see is a > discount for current registered users so they can buy dis

The Bat! Christmas Discount Suggestion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL! The Christmas Special letter seems to be geared towards current users upgrading their copy of The Bat!. Many of us have already done so. What I would like to see is a discount for current registered users so they can buy discounted copie

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Jonathan Monday, October 6, 2003, 1:25:12 AM, you wrote: V Perhaps you could include the cut mark as part of the listserv footer V then, instead of relying on users? JA> Although I say this might be one good idea, it doesn't get rid of the JA> fact that some people have huge signature

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Quoting Jonathan Angliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday, October 05, 2003, Vishal wrote.. > > MDP>> (#There's a hole in my bucket, dear Liza, dear Liza#) > > > ummm..huh? > > It is a song, it appears only those from England know... I often

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, October 05, 2003, Vishal wrote... V>>> Perhaps you could include the cut mark as part of the listserv V>>> footer then, instead of relying on users? Although I say this might be one good idea, it doesn't get rid of the fact that some peopl

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Marck, On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:29:11 +0100 GMT (06/10/2003, 16:29 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP>>> (#There's a hole in my bucket, dear Liza, dear Liza#) > It's a song, quite long, that starts with that line, continues with > Liza suggesting remedies, ending up with a bucket being

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Marck Monday, October 6, 2003, 5:29:11 AM, you wrote: MDP>> It doesn't work properly in TB by default. It only cuts the MDP>> last signature it finds. Also, only the final cut mark is also MDP>> seen as the real signature delimiter by the RTV, defeating TB's MDP>> wonderful signature display f

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Thomas Monday, October 6, 2003, 2:06:31 AM, you wrote: TF> It doesn't seem to have made it into the archives yet. Marck just says TF> that putting a cutmark into the list footer wouldn't work for TB, was TF> tested,etc. Thanks..Marck replied too. TF> That's an old song; Marck is referring to

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Here it is, a reply to Andrew Hodgson's suggestion \-- LG>>> Again, not using a cut mark was something we've already tried. AH>> ... I include the cutmark in the footer, ... ... AH>> Is there a reason why this is not a good idea? MDP> It doesn't

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Vishal, On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 00:55:45 -0400 GMT (06/10/2003, 11:55 +0700 GMT), Vishal wrote: MDP>> Please see mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I don't have that message stored on my machine. Any chance you could paste the > text or tell me what to search for so I know what you were trying to say? It

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Deborah Saturday, October 4, 2003, 5:24:51 PM, you wrote: DW> Marck has already explained why this does not work, earlier in this thread. I didn't see that. DW> Only text which falls below the last cut-mark inserted will be stripped, DW> which means that if you have a cutmark, followed by a

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Marck Saturday, October 4, 2003, 5:29:59 PM, you wrote: V>> Perhaps you could include the cut mark as part of the listserv V>> footer then, instead of relying on users? MDP> Please see mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't have that message stored on my machine. Any chance you could paste the text o

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Vishal, @4-Oct-2003, 13:35 -0400 (04-Oct 18:35 UK time) Vishal [V] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP>> We want the footer inserted, but not quoted in replies. V> Perhaps you could include the cut mark as part of the listserv V> footer then, instead of relying on users? Please see m

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

On Saturday, October 4, 2003, 1:35:35 PM, Vishal wrote: V> Perhaps you could include the cut mark as part of the listserv footer V> then, instead of relying on users? Marck has already explained why this does not work, earlier in this thread. Only text which falls below the last cut-mark inserted

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Andrew Saturday, October 4, 2003, 3:17:35 PM, you wrote: AH> What I actually meant in this message was that if I don't have time AH> to read the rules in the welcome message because sometimes it can AH> take longer to read it with a screen reader, and that I have to stay AH> concen

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Marck Friday, October 3, 2003, 7:33:19 AM, you wrote: MDP> No. If the list server adds the footer because it contains important MDP> information. We want the footer inserted, but not quoted in replies. Perhaps you could include the cut mark as part of the listserv footer then, instead of rely

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Vishal, Saturday, October 4, 2003, 6:30:36 PM, you wrote: V> Hi Thomas V> Saturday, October 4, 2003, 12:25:04 AM, you wrote: TF>> So users of screen readers should be excepted from reading the rules? V> Nobody said they should be excepted. I think the opinion was that they should be V>

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Thomas Saturday, October 4, 2003, 12:25:04 AM, you wrote: TF> So users of screen readers should be excepted from reading the rules? Nobody said they should be excepted. I think the opinion was that they should be 'excused' for not having read them. I agree with this. It's only being understan

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Urban- !!! ROTFL -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Leif, In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 3 Oct 2003 15:13:26 (my local time 23:13:26), you typed: MB>> So, would you help me word it--the Wish List suggestion? Since I'm MB>> feeling a little bit language-impaired this a

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Saturday, October 4, 2003, Mark Partous wrote: > 0.2c? How does one pay that? :-) By finding 20 persons named Millicent -- Urban Eventually, the Romans conquered the Greeks. History calls people Romans because they never stayed in one place for very long.

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Allie, Saturday, October 4, 2003, 2:42:43 AM, you wrote: AM> I'd add my 0.2c worth 0.2c? How does one pay that? :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.00.6 Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" infor

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Leif and all, 1. AsI have privately stated to one of the list members, I believe in following list rules. What surprises me about this entire cut line issue is that I was not asked to insert one when I first posted. 2. PL] Leif, you wrongly addressed me which has already been pointed out by

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Leif, On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:20:16 -0600 GMT (04/10/2003, 03:20 +0700 GMT), Leif Gregory wrote: > To expound upon your idea, if RITLabs were willing, is that in > addition to the "Thanks for trying/buying TB" message that is the > first e-mail in your in box (part of the distribution), I thi

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Andrew, On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:14:43 +0100 GMT (04/10/2003, 05:14 +0700 GMT), Andrew Hodgson wrote: GK>> "Terms and conditions of" and you're browsing using a screen reader ;)) > Well you are right; I just chuck the list rules [...] and as you > said in another post, viewing the message wit

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Leif Gregory, [LG] wrote: LG> Nah, Marck, Allie and I are nearly family. They certainly feel like LG> brothers. I'm late on this one since work has been a tad demanding of late. :) Anyway, this is an interesting thread and I thought I'd add my 0.2c worth of sentiments. I have to agree with Leif

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

K> Sure. I don't think I make a general statement against rules. I mean GK> to say that if I where browsing the 'Welcome to' message and took it's GK> suggestion by heart to make sure you read the rules, it remains a GK> question how to find them if the section itself

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello ETM, Friday, October 3, 2003, 3:14:47 PM, you wrote: E> I am going to do that here to see if something that is occurring on E> other lists is recreated. If it is, HOW does one prevent it? If it E> is not recreated with this message, I will send through a copied E> example. Sorry for the intr

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

10/3/2003, 5:13 PM: Leif said in "Suggestion for better message list view reading" LG> Yeah, I'll help, but let's give it a day or so to see what LG> other people think. If it's just you and me who think it might be a LG> worthwhile idea, then it wouldn&

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Leif! On Friday, October 03, 2003, 4:13 PM, you wrote: MB>> So, would you help me word it--the Wish List suggestion? ... MB>> ought not to take as much of the developers' time as modifying MB>> code. Ritlabs might go for it. :) L> Yeah, I'll help, but l

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

I am going to tag onto this message hoping a problem will be recreated. I am involved with a great many lists in which top posting is the preference (ignore that fact for now, I am aware of your views here). As a top poster, I leave most of the old message beneath my message, but scroll/highlight

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Mary, Friday, October 3, 2003, 2:52:59 PM, you wrote: MB> Yay! Something good might come out of all my stumbling around. MB> So, would you help me word it--the Wish List suggestion? Since I'm MB> feeling a little bit language-impaired this afternoon? Setting up MB> the

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

ince TBUDL is such MB>> an important adjunct to the Help file? L> Heck, I'll vote for it... :-) Yay! Something good might come out of all my stumbling around. So, would you help me word it--the Wish List suggestion? Since I'm feeling a little bit language-impaired this afternoon

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Mary, Friday, October 3, 2003, 2:02:29 PM, you wrote: MB> What if The Bat!'s developers could preload TBUDL's address into MB> the address book, with all the right templates also there by MB> default? Would that be hard to do? No, it'd be relatively simple. However there are a couple of co

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Leif! On Friday, October 03, 2003, 1:59 PM, you wrote, in part: L> ... Unless someone has already added the address L> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to the TB addressbook, it won't be there L> for them to highlight. They'll have to add the address first in L> that case, and then modify the reply temp

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

if I where browsing the 'Welcome to' message and took it's suggestion by heart to make sure you read the rules, it remains a question how to find them if the section itself starts with a headline "Terms and conditions of" and you're browsing using a screen reader ;)) --

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Leif! On Friday, October 03, 2003, 1:59 PM, you wrote: MB>> I've probably given mistaken instructions somewhere here, also, MB>> which I'm sure someone will write in pronto in order to correct MB>> me! :) L> Nope, this sentence doesn't contain any technical errors! I'll L> stop fixing her

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Mary, Friday, October 3, 2003, 12:40:03 PM, you wrote: MB> No, you're not! And by your "" I can tell you don't think MB> that Marck believes that, either. Nah, Marck, Allie and I are nearly family. They certainly feel like brothers. MB> Tools/Address Book and highlight [EMAIL PROTECTED] C

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

At 2:40 PM on 10/3/2003, Gerrit Kiers typed ... G> I would have skipped it the moment I heard 'Terms and conditions ...' Why is that? Without rules, there is chaos. There's already enough chaos in the world. The rules are easy enough to read and they make the list work better. Here's a justific

Corrected pointer: Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

I am sorry. I wanted to point to this message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] when explaining why I think Pranav was treated rather unfriendly from the first moment on. Gerrit Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.c

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Gerrit, Friday, October 3, 2003, 12:40:51 PM, you wrote: GK> I think you wrongly address Pranav for stating the list is rude GK> and unfriendly. Whoa... That was totally my bad. My sincerest apologies to Pranav. I have no idea why I ended up coming up with his name vs. DZ-Jay. Sorry Pranav

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

DZ-Jay- Friday, October 3, 2003, 3:41:45 AM, you wrote: DJ> Don't you think its a bit obsessive to force people that don't event DJ> have a sig block to add a cut line? If the problem is that you don't DJ> want to see the footer inserted automatically by the list server, then DJ> the problem lie

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Leif! On Friday, October 03, 2003, 9:38 AM, you wrote: Leif> Ouch, I'm the bad guy! No, you're not! And by your "" I can tell you don't think that Marck believes that, either. When I first crashed into this list way last October, Marck got me for Top Posting and for breaking a thread. Th

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Leif, Friday, October 3, 2003, 4:38:41 PM, you wrote: LG> As for why you (Pranav) believe the list is rude and unfriendly, I think you wrongly address Pranav for stating the list is rude and unfriendly. Pranav has not responded to this thread since he erased his name under his message and

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Friday, October 3, 2003, 6:45:46 AM, you wrote: > When I do post, I re-read my > email many times to look for possible errors and to make sure that my > meaning is clear and not subject to misinterpretation. And as Martha Stewart would say, that's a "good thing." -- Best regards, Jack

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

10/3/2003, 10:52 AM: Andrew said in "Suggestion for better message list view reading" AH> Hello Allen, AH> Only AFAIK if the signature separater is <-><-> - AH> that is two dashes, followed by a space, Right. I oops-ed. AH> On another tack, if

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Andrew, on Fri, 3 Oct 2003 15:52:10 +0100GMT (03.10.03, 16:52 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : AH> if using justification, what is the best way to ensure the AH> justification keeps the same if you edit a line (see the longer line AH> above)? This can look quite messy. Hit

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Andrew, @3-Oct-2003, 15:58 Andrew Hodgson [AH] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Leif: LG>> Again, not using a cut mark was something we've already tried. AH> ... I include the cutmark in the footer, so even if there is AH> no cut mark, then the footer gets trimmed anyway. It seems to A

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

gt; Ouch, I'm the bad guy! LG> Again, not using a cut mark was something we've already tried. Just a suggestion, if it has been tried before then apologies. On my lists hosted by EZMLM, I include the cutmark in the footer, so even if there is no cut mark, then th

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Allen, Thursday, October 2, 2003, 1:54:44 PM, you wrote: A> 10/2/2003, 8:12 AM: Pranav said in "Suggestion for better message list view reading" PL>> What do you mean by a Cut line? A> Proper etiquette on this list is to have a cut line or signature A>

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Marck, Friday, October 3, 2003, 5:33:19 AM, you wrote: MDP> I am personally indifferent about the cut mark rule but Leif is MDP> not and I support him fully, mostly for the reason I just stated. Ouch, I'm the bad guy! Again, not using a cut mark was something we've already tried. If peop

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Jeffrey! On Friday, October 03, 2003, 6:45 AM, you wrote William Moore>> Rude? Un-friendly? Surely not. WM>> The mods go out of their way to be the exact opposite. J> I would not call it rude and unfriendly, but it can be intimidating to J> the newbie. ... But it's not because any of the

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi William Moore, On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 13:19:51 +0100 you wrote: WM> The difference from lists I've since joined (eg DOpus) is striking. I can definitely agree with that. Sometimes other lists look down right messy after this one. The Opera Users list is a good example. Many people on that lis

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

On Friday, October 3, 2003 at 06:41 (which was Friday, October 3, 2003 at 12:41 where I am) Dz-Jay [DJ] wrote: DJ> Oh, now I've done it. Go ahead TB demi-gods, flame away. I'm DJ> already used to the rudeness and unfriendliness of this list. If you want to be treated 'rude' and 'unfriendly', join

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi DZ-Jay, on Fri, 3 Oct 2003 06:41:45 -0400GMT (03.10.03, 12:41 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : DJ> I'm already used to the rudeness and unfriendliness of this list. I'm missing a smilie. Do you really mean TBUDL? I cannot quite believe this. I perceive TBUDL as one of the

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Jeffrey Thank you for your email dated Friday, October 3, 2003, 12:45:46 PM, in which you wrote: WM>> The mods go out of their way to be the exact opposite. JAS> I would not call it rude and unfriendly, but it can be intimidating to JAS> the newbie. Or even to the veteran of other lists.

Re[3]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

At 8:32 PM on 10/2/2003, Pranav Lal typed ... P> Hi Allen, P> delimiter. Your precede your signature with -- ( dot dot dash ). Most P> people on this list are, naturally, using The Bat!, and TB P> automatically truncates all text from the delimiter on down. P> Thanks for the expl

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi William Moore, On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:32:35 +0100 you wrote: WM> Rude? Un-friendly? Surely not. WM> WM> The mods go out of their way to be the exact opposite. I would not call it rude and unfriendly, but it can be intimidating to the newbie. Or even to the veteran of other lists. I rarely p

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Good afternoon MAU ! On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 13:23:18 +0200 GMT your local time, which was 03.10.2003, 13:23 (GMT+0200) where I live, you (MAU MAU) wrote in : >> I'm already used to the rudeness and unfriendliness of this list. > While I may somewhat agree with you that the

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Dz-Jay, @3-Oct-2003, 06:41 -0400 (03-Oct 11:41 UK time) DZ-Jay [DJ] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: DJ> Don't you think its a bit obsessive to force people that don't DJ> event have a sig block to add a cut line? No I don't. It's in the list rules. If we all stick to the rules, it's b

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello DZ-Jay Thank you for your email dated Friday, October 3, 2003, 11:41:45 AM, in which you wrote: DJ> Oh, now I've done it. Go ahead TB demi-gods, flame away. I'm already DJ> used to the rudeness and unfriendliness of this list. Rude? Un-friendly? Surely not. The mods go out of their way

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello DZ-Jay, Friday, October 3, 2003, 12:41:45 PM, you wrote: DJ> Don't you think its a bit obsessive to force people that don't event DJ> have a sig block to add a cut line? I would think so as well. I was actually just following this thread from the moment Pranav wrote "I don't have a message

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello DZ-Jay, > I'm already used to the rudeness and unfriendliness of this list. While I may somewhat agree with you that the list is perhaps a bit obsessive about cut lines, etc., I *strongly* disagree on rudeness and unfriendliness. Much the contrary. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Es

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Some time around 10/3/2003 06:26:18, I think I heard Marck D Pearlstone say: > Hi Pranav, > @03-Oct-2003, 15:06 +0530 (10:36 UK time) Pranav Lal said: >> > now on. >> You nmean like this? > No - all you did was to remove your name, leaving the list footer > exposed. The courteous thing to do is

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Pranav, @03-Oct-2003, 15:06 +0530 (10:36 UK time) Pranav Lal said: > now on. > You nmean like this? No - all you did was to remove your name, leaving the list footer exposed. The courteous thing to do is to add a NewLine, dash, dash, space, newline to the end of your message text above your

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Mark, You nmean like this? Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Pranav, @03-Oct-2003, 06:02 +0530 (01:32 UK time) Pranav Lal said: > Thanks for the explanation. I don't have a message signature so I > don't think that I need a cut line. Oh, but you do! Your name is your signature and any list you write mail to adds more text below it. It is a courtesy to

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

On Friday, October 3, 2003, 2:26:12 AM, you wrote: > Leif, the man is hungry. He knows how to catch a fish, but all you > give him is a "U". Gimme an F, gimme an I, gimme an S, gimme an H! But shouldn;t you give him a G, an H, an O, a T, and an I -- with the gh from laugh, the o from women and th

Re[2]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hi Allen, Thanks for the explanation. I don't have a message signature so I don't think that I need a cut line. Pranav Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Leif, On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:57:38 -0600 GMT (02/10/2003, 21:57 +0700 GMT), Leif Gregory wrote: LG>>> Rather A>> I think I deserve a fish. > S'ok. ... We'll just pretend that you were in the middle of > a heavy Morse Code conversation, and you mistakenly spelled out the > letter "U"

Re[3]: Suggestion for better message list view reading

Hello Allen, Thursday, October 2, 2003, 4:50:03 PM, you wrote: LG>> Rather A> I think I deserve a fish. I think you should go to the nearest river, lake or sea and catch one for yourself! 't Would be too easy! :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 2.00.6

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >