Re: JkSet directives for mod_jk2?

2002-06-10 Thread costinm
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Douglas, Rory wrote: It seems the config format for httpd.conf has changed: Apache now complains about JkWorkersFile etc. A little searching unearthed people using JkSet and including a lot of stuff that used to be in workers.properties directly in httpd.conf.

RE: [Proposal] Tomcat and Cactus (Repost)

2002-05-25 Thread costinm
I would prefer to see a self-contained WAR file ( or a set of self-contained wars ). Costin On Sat, 25 May 2002, Vincent Massol wrote: Thanks to speak your mind Costin. At least you answered. I would have liked more feedback from other committers. For the time being I'll prepare a

Re: [Proposal] Tomcat and Cactus (Repost)

2002-05-24 Thread costinm
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Vincent Massol wrote: I'm reposting in the secret hope that I got no response to this email I sent last week because no one saw it in the flood of Tomcat emails ! If I get no answer this time, I will understand that no one finds this of interest and will try again in 6

Re: Status of JK2

2002-05-17 Thread costinm
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote: I'm now running TC4.1.2 and want to use mod_jk2/apache2 for the early stages of my project however I'm not certain what the issues are or when it might become production quality or what I see the empty download areas set up for the

Re: Loadbalancing....please Help!

2002-05-03 Thread costinm
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Gabriel Maffia wrote: I thought that Sticky Sessions were a mod_jk feature...not a tomcat feature. Besides, Its weird that a newer version of Tomcat doesnt handle sticky sessions There is one small piece that tomcat must do ( when it generates new sessions ). It has

Re: Loadbalancing....please Help!

2002-05-03 Thread costinm
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Gabriel Maffia wrote: Apache 1.3.23 Tomcat 4.0.1 Jboss 4.2.3 You may try 4.0.2, if I remember corectly the jvmRoute was introduced after 4.0.1 ( but that's so long ago..., I may be wrong ) Costin I´ve used mod_jk and the loadbalancer connector to connect my web

RE: Which Connector for Tomcat 4.0.3 - mod_webapp or mod_jk

2002-05-02 Thread costinm
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Noel J. Bergman wrote: AIUI, mod_webapp has been easier to configure; mod_jk offers load balancing, The configuration is the same, for the 'basic' things: WebAppDeploy examples /examples is arguably as easy as: JkMount /examples/* tomcat And has the same effect (i.e.

Re: Re: mod_jk: ajp13: cpu load problem with apache

2002-05-02 Thread costinm
On Thu, 2 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all thank you for your interest. I will download the latest code and try this out. I do have the debug mode enabled so I will sent you any errors (although I have not noticed anything special). I don't think though that I can reproduce

Re: mod_jk performance optimization

2002-05-02 Thread costinm
On Thu, 2 May 2002, M. Serrano wrote: Hi. I've got installed in my box Linux, Apache 1.3.19, JDK 1.3.1 and TC 3.3.1 working with ajp13. The following error appeard in my mod_jk.log after a bit of continuous utilisation: [jk_ajp13_worker.c (203)]: connection_tcp_get_message: Error -

Re: mod_jk: ajp13: cpu load problem with apache

2002-05-01 Thread costinm
Can you try the CVS head, and see if it still happens ? If so, can you give us more details that would allow to reproduce it ? Messages like 'it doesn't work for me, you figure out why' are not very helpfull. At least enable the debug messages, let it run until it hungs, then maybe trim the

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-30 Thread costinm
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote: One last question is how does coyote fit into this whole picture? Where/how is the best way to obtain the latest coyote stuff (ie; coyote jar drop, build from srcxxx) ? Coyote is the new 'connector API' - the java side of jk is independent of

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-30 Thread costinm
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote: Is there a useful table anywhere documenting the relationship(s) of the various apache modules to the various tomcat connectors? Something like this: There are about 4 'connectors' implementing HTTP ( 1 in 3.3, coyote-http11 and 2 impl. in 4.x

Re: Which Connectors?

2002-04-29 Thread costinm
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote: I'm confused with the state of the connectors available for Apache2/Tomcat integration. Could someone, please, shed some light on this. The following is some of what I've read/interpreted from messages on this list: mod_jk: Unstable

RE: mod_jk1.2.0 with Apache2.0.35 on Solaris8

2002-04-29 Thread costinm
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Steve Wong wrote: Hello, I have changed those configuration files to the same as yours. But still don't work. Don't know will it because that my mod_jk.so has problem or not. I use ant to make the mod_jk.so from the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.2-01-src When making,

RE: Apache+tomcat Integration....Confused....

2002-04-29 Thread costinm
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Vinay Singh wrote: As far as I know - 1) mod_webapp is latest and will continue to evolve It's development started the 'latest', true. 2) mod_jk will not see any future enhancements and will have only bug fixes That's completely false. mod_jk has a stable version

Re: Which Connectors?

2002-04-29 Thread costinm
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote: Costin, Thank you very much for this claification!!! Could you, or someone, advise/point to document on where jk2 is with regards to function completion? Most of the essential features ( Ajp over TCP, with manual configuration ) are done.

Re: Which Connectors?

2002-04-29 Thread costinm
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote: You mentioned something about a tar problem. Does the cvs snapshot tar work? 'tar' is not the problem :-), but the snapshot that is included with 4.0.2/4.0.3. The nightly is fine, and 4.0.4/3.3.2 will include the right snapshot ( I hope ).

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-28 Thread costinm
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Michael Delamere wrote: I think another point of confusion is what future mod_jk is going to have. I´ve read a lot about the future of this connector lately and it appears that a lot of work is taking place right now in order to get mod_jk2 running stable and to improve

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-27 Thread costinm
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote: The example for mod_jk2 shows a worker's config for AJP13 but I thought that jk2 is AJP14? Well, there is a lot of confusion ( and I'm talking about those of us who are working on the connector !). We used to call 'ajp13' 3 things: - a wire

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-27 Thread costinm
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Michael Delamere wrote: Me again :-) An interesting thing is that the source-files at cvs seem to be different to the ones that you can download from the jakarta site. Use the cvs, let me know ( or post on tomcat-dev ) if it doesn't work. We changed the name to

Re: Apache 2, Tomcat 4 and mod_jk2

2002-04-27 Thread costinm
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Simon Stewart wrote: The workers can be called anything you want them to be (for example, I use tomcat1) What tends to happen is that people take their (working) apache 1.3.x + mod_jk combo and use the same config files with apache 2.x and mod_jk2. Well... I was

Re: load balancing and inactive workers

2002-04-02 Thread costinm
There is no such tool for mod_jk yet. Next version ( Jk2 ) will have such a thing - but it's not even alpha, it'll take few more months to complete it. Costin On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Matthew Tepel wrote: We are working on transitioning from Jserv to Tomcat 4.0 (believe it or not), and there

Re: load balancing and inactive workers

2002-04-02 Thread costinm
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Matthew Tepel wrote: This is a feature that we really need. I would consider writing it myself if I knew more about how mod_jk works, what previous discussion has gone on in this area, how much work it involves, etc. Any suggestions? Any help is great. You can start by

Re: Mapping *.abc requests to Tomcat

2002-04-01 Thread costinm
First question - with tomcat3.x, are you still using mod_jserv ? If it worked before with jserv, it should still work with the exactly same apache config and module as before, assuming you have a 'recent' mod_jserv ( i.e. 1..2 years old - but I think '99 would work too ). Just replace the

Re: Mapping *.abc requests to Tomcat

2002-04-01 Thread costinm
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Jakarta Tomcat Newsgroup wrote: Subject: Re: Mapping *.abc requests to Tomcat From: Hyunjin Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] === when stopping: 1. stop apache 2. stop tomcat when starting 1. start tomcat 2. start apache (someone says 10 seconds delay between starting of

Re: Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem

2001-12-14 Thread costinm
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Renato wrote: *** HTML pages with latin characters don't display correctly on Linux *** ( JSP file with: ) Ex: páéíóú/p It's maybe a problem with the locale variables on my Linux, which I don't quite understand ( tried LC_ALL, LANG, LC_CTYPE and it didn't work ) or