Our discussions on modularity have gone quiet and Kelvin and Luciano
have started to build distributions for SDO and DAS. I'd like to open
the discussion up about what should be in our next release, how we
should approach it and when we think it might be ready. As the person
opening this th
On Aug 16, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Bert Lamb wrote:
Hi Oisin,
I am still at the point where I am trying to get my head really
wrapped around how Tuscany works and how one would go about creating a
REST binding, so I'm afraid I'm not quite at the point where I am
capable of speaking very intelligentl
On Aug 16, 2006, at 10:05 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
I also found that we now have three projects "launcher", "test",
and "webapp" containing the same set of SCDL files. How can we
simplify the synchronization among the three projects here? Can
these files be shared?
Patches welcome.
--
Jere
We've discussed API modules before but not got around to actually do
implementing them. Ant and I were chatting this morning and to get
the webapp stuff working we concluded we were going to need this. As
I starting point I am going to add two new modules to the build:
api intended to
edent
ulitilies such as StaxUtils.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Jeremy Boynes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 1:56 PM
Subject: Dependency on Woodstox
The following classes have a dependency on classes from com.ctc:
./databinding-framew
On Aug 16, 2006, at 6:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, the motive behind my original email was the ability to run
the Tuscany runtime within an IDE, similar to how you would run
Tomcat within Eclipse for example. Debugging is only one use case
for this. I know there are implications aro
I didn't see what this had to do with loading so split the thread.
On Aug 16, 2006, at 3:10 AM, Liu, Jervis wrote:
Jeremy, I also have a question for you. What do you mean by saying
"allow the extension directory to contain simple SCDL files (xml
files) that define composites and which get
I view Celtix as you said: "as a product that provides
implementations to several bindings." The same can be said for Axis
with its support for different transports, and I would not be
surprised if there are yet more (e.g. ServiceMix).
The spec has not "preserved" binding names - it is spec
On Aug 15, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
Do you think it is better to key things off the "definition" class
or just run through all of the extension builders and have them
decide if they want to process something or not (or the registry
could automate the decision). Doing this would al
On Aug 15, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Thanks Jeremy.
That was indeed a long email and also very informative. I take your
point that the components should be testable in isolation without
needing an SCA runtime to be available. The objective of unit
testing a component is
It doesn't matter which logging framework you pick, it will be the
wrong one :-)
What I mean is that, as a library, you don't get to pick which
logging framework the application that is using you chose. This
provides a problem where log messages from the library may end up
routed separately
On Aug 15, 2006, at 6:39 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Rather hack the code you can just set the "tuscany.installDir"
system
property
Thanks Jeremy, I did see the usage of tuscany.installDir. My question
was in the absence of the system property, does the runtime always
need
to resolve the
ucture. Similarly there could be a
'extensions' directory which could contain all the stuff related to
tuscany
extensions.
- Venkat
On 8/15/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 15, 2006, at 6:39 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
>>> Rather hack the co
On Aug 15, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I was working on DAS distribution and notices various components
use various
"standards" for groupId and artifactId (e.g DAS use different
grouping the
SDO, etc)
I was just wondering if we have any guidelines on how to group sub-
projects
On Aug 15, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Kapish Aggarwal wrote:
Hey David,
Trying to run the samples on the current source.
I don't know about Eclipse but this is how I do it in IDEA:
* Install the standalone distribution of Tuscany to /tmp/foo
* Create a junit configuration for e.g. CalculatorTestCase
On Aug 15, 2006, at 6:39 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Rather hack the code you can just set the "tuscany.installDir"
system
property
Thanks Jeremy, I did see the usage of tuscany.installDir. My question
was in the absence of the system property, does the runtime always
need
to resolve the
On Aug 15, 2006, at 4:53 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
patch the launcher so it doesn't insist in being run from a jar file
Do you know why the launcher insists of being loaded from a JAR file?
So it can find the installation directory so set up the RuntimeInfo
so that the extension mech
On Aug 14, 2006, at 10:41 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Jim / Jeremy,
I have been able to go forward quite a bit.
Cool
- Which is the scdl into which I must add the RMIHost component. I
added it
first to the system.scdl in SCA-API project. But that did not get
picked up
by the loader.
Jervis
I agree with this. I view the extension dir as just one way
extensions could be installed - there's nothing special about this
mechanism, it is simply triggered by having a DirectoryScanExtender
component loaded as part of the system composite.
I think there is a problem with the s
For TUSCANY-619 I am going to move some of the function currently in
core into separate modules so that we can get the classloader
isolation right.
The goal here is to break the modules down into four categories:
1) core runtime (spi, core) and dependencies
2) extensions (containers, bindings
Reporter: Jeremy Boynes
Assigned To: Jeremy Boynes
We have the start of a classloader hierarchy working for extension code but it
is not being set up correctly in some environments e.g. the current web
launcher. This is causing problems when loading extensions such as Axis.
--
This
Yes, the name in the attribute is the name of the composite not the
name for the component.
The "application" name is only used by the launcher as it, by design,
only deploys a single application; it would be possible to derive the
name somehow e.g. from the file name. If you look at the se
On Aug 13, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
- each registry is identified by a port on which it runs. I am
not sure
how hostname can be used for services. However, for references
host names
has a role to play. Right?
For services it would determine the address that the port wo
: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Core
Reporter: Jeremy Boynes
On the devlist, jboynes wrote: "Thinking a little more, using the
ImplementationProcessor mechanisms seems like a better way to tackle this. One
major advantage would be that we
SDO which could be detected through the marker
interface or an @SDO annotation).
I have a head full of WSDL stuff atm so I'll open a JIRA so we don't
forget.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Perhaps - this just seemed real simple.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 12
Perhaps - this just seemed real simple.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:19 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
Jeremy,
I haven't had time to look at this carefully but would it be better
to have InterfaceJavaIntrospector be an ImplementationProcessor
since the component type information for POJOs is com
se jump in.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Pete Robbins wrote:
I'll add some C++ content. Will you add the nominations of new
committers
etc.?
Cheers,
On 11/08/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This means us.
I can pull together the Java/SCA side - can someone plea
Operation, I thin we need to add a list of fault types.
List> faultTypes;
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Jeremy Boynes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: Refactoring of Service Contracts
On Aug 9, 2006, at
On Aug 11, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
Forgot about the host. If we want to have one component per
registry, what happens when two services register at the same
host/port combination?
If two registries register, the second should fail (as it won't be
able to get the socket anyway).
The other elements would go at the level of the "break" - indent 4 or
indent 8 respectively.
That's actually why I prefer the "no-indent" case as it puts the
other elements at the same indent as if you were using an "if" block
in rather than an additional 4 characters in.
--
Jeremy
On Au
My vote
On Aug 11, 2006, at 5:55 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
In our code guidelines (or at least the IDE setup files), case is
not indented
switch (i) {
case 1:
break;
[X] No indent
[ ] Indent 4 characters
--
Jeremy
In our code guidelines (or at least the IDE setup files), case is not
indented
switch (i) {
case 1:
break;
but the checkstyle profile is looking for a 4 character indent:
switch (i) {
case 1:
break;
which do we want?
[ ] No indent
[ ] Indent 4 character
Having just made modifications to most of the sca source tree to fix
the CR problems, I plan to make this change later today.
--
Jeremy
On Jul 19, 2006, at 1:43 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 19, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Is this is good time to do this to the trunk
On Aug 11, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
If I remember correctly, JDK1.4 compatibility is a requirement by
the SDO for java spec 2.0.1. But for the tuscany extensions, for
example, StAX support, the bar can be lifted if we have these
features in an optional package.
Doesn'
I've just wasted an hour or so working with Raymond trying to figure
out why a patch he supplied would not apply. I am writing this in a
suitably frustrated mood ...
It appears that there are many many files in our svn tree that do not
have the correct properties set.
Some files are mis
On Aug 11, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Aug 11, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Aug 11, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Aug 10, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
My imagination of the Registry is that it is lightweight and it
should be ok
to host
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-615?page=comments#action_12427625
]
Jeremy Boynes commented on TUSCANY-615:
---
There seem to be quite a few changes in this patch unrelated to the problem
described above.
Please can you
On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
At the risk of complicating matters, what about services? For
symmetry we should also consider a couple more scenarios
1) Component->Component - this must lie within a Composite and may
have local or remote semantics
2) Component->Refe
On Aug 11, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Aug 10, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
My imagination of the Registry is that it is lightweight and it
should be ok
to host several instances of it on a host, ofcourse each on a
different
port. Hence we might actually allow the a
On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
3.0.0 works only on 1.5 and above :(
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-commons-dev/200608.mbox/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So does Tuscany :-)
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscrib
This means us.
I can pull together the Java/SCA side - can someone please add
information on the C++ side.
The report covers the last 3 months.
--
Jeremy
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: August 11, 2006 11:07:35 AM PDT
To:
Subject: REMINDER: AUGU
I have a feeling there may be some confusion here with terminology -
heck, I know I'm confused :-)
I think there are several scenarios here and would like to make sure
they are all being covered.
1) Component->Component - this must lie within a Composite and may
have local or remote semanti
I understand what you're trying to say? The JavaDoc for
TargetInvoker.clone says "Implementations must support deep cloning".
...ant
On 8/11/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 11, 2006, at 7:36 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I did wonder about this, doesn'
On Aug 11, 2006, at 9:48 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing the same error on Groovy container inside Eclipse. And
the following diff fixes the complaint (I assume the existing code
is valid).
-expect(factory.getInstance()).andReturn("bar");
+expect((String) factory.ge
On Aug 11, 2006, at 7:36 AM, ant elder wrote:
I did wonder about this, doesn't it need to be a deep copy? I don't
really
understand the purpose of cacheable, but if its set on the one
instance
shouldn't it be also set on the clone? And do subclasses need to
copy their
fields? Say the RMI bi
On Aug 11, 2006, at 2:04 AM, ant elder wrote:
Ok I've added a TargetInvokerExtension. The clone method doesn't seem
perfect yet as subclasses now aren't forced to implement clone by the
compiler.
I've not had coffee yet but AIUI you don't need to override clone in
subclasses unless you need
In the Java version we are using WSDL2.0's wsdlLocation feature:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#wsdlLocation-aii
For an example of how a service would look you might check this thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200608.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jeremy
On Aug 11, 2
On Aug 10, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Thanks Ant and Jim.
Ant, I shall certainly work on the formatting and a couple of other
issues
and posted an updated patch asap.
Jim, you point was something that I did vacillate about. I was
wondering if
the registry should be starte
We have some basic parsing code for WSDL service contracts right now
but this needs to be finished. To put a stake in the ground I intend
to make the following work:
* support for parsing elements
* support for WSDL resolution based on the WSDL2.0 wsdlLocation
mechanism. This will require t
Setting up a runtime or an application?
If it's just an application then you should be able to construct your
configuration by hand and pass it to the Builder to create the
runtime component then then add the built component as a child. One
way to do this might be to subclass DeployerImpl a
IIRC the 2.1 version caused the build to be run twice. We have been
using the snapshot for a while - what problems did you see?
--
Jeremy
On Aug 10, 2006, at 2:04 AM, Liu, Jervis wrote:
Hi,
The maven-assembly-plugin version we used (2.2-SNAPSHOT) caused a
lot of problems in my build. Is th
On Aug 9, 2006, at 8:16 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
Another issue that has come up is representation of data binding
types for parameters. We could perhaps have a generic
representation of an operation, Operation, that has a
getParameterTypes() which returns a collection of Class elements.
The
Added to tuscany-developers
--
Jeremy
On Aug 9, 2006, at 8:50 PM, Kevin Williams wrote:
Jeremy,
Can you please add Luciano to the JIRA system so that he can assign
himself issues?
Thanks,
--Kevin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Joel
With your knowledge of OSGi, is this header set reasonable or are
there others we should be adding?
--
Jeremy
On Jul 21, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 21, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Several questions:
1) What's going to happen if a 3rd party dependen
On Aug 9, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Hawkins, Joel wrote:
JIRA is in. Looking forward to working with Tuscany - lots to learn!
Thanks - quite a lot there, may take some time to grok it all.
One immediate question though. Apache cannot accept EPL licensed
items in source form due to the downstream r
On Aug 9, 2006, at 12:29 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Hi Jeremy
I'd be interested in working on some variation of BigBank or
maybe a new
sample scenarion that would use a Ajax front end. Do you have any
toughts on
possible scenarios, or areas you would like to exercise in this ajax
sample.
One thing we are looking for is real-world applications of SCA -
things that can show off what Tuscany can do.
If you have any applications in mind they would be welcome. These
could be variants on the BigBank theme (say a Ajax front end) or
something completely different.
--
Jeremy
On A
On Aug 9, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Hawkins, Joel wrote:
Hello Jims (Venkata, and everyone else struggling with bindings, etc.)
I have an OSGi binding implementation that's sort of working now (I
can
run the SupplyChain example in equinox, repackaged into a couple of
bundles, etc). There's a binding
On Aug 9, 2006, at 5:30 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at some pom.xml files, particularly the ones for java sca
distributions, to try to work out what additions would be needed to
permit
building a separate sdo java distribution. I can see the general
pattern,
but if anyone ha
today.
thanks,
dims
On 8/9/06, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are building with Axis 2.0 version 1.0 release.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Are u folks using latest Axis2 SVN?
>
> -- dims
>
> On 8/9/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Aug
On Aug 8, 2006, at 8:38 PM, cr22rc wrote:
If we can find another way without applying our private changes to
Axis I'm perfectly fine by that. Have any detailed suggestion off
hand?
Looks like the problem may lie in o.a.axiom.om.util.StAXUtils - can
you confirm that where you were getting
On Aug 8, 2006, at 8:38 PM, cr22rc wrote:
If we can find another way without applying our private changes to
Axis I'm perfectly fine by that. Have any detailed suggestion off
hand? Do I have access to that particular classloader at the Axis
binding point? Not sure. Need to check tomorrow.
On Aug 8, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Hi All,
After looking at the code I found that tuscany has bindings for
WebServices,
RMI and JBI.
According to the SCA spec it also talks about bindings for
transports like
JMS (or have I misunderstood it?)
Is there an effort to do su
n for
Stax.
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The deployer should never need the TCCL to be adjusted. What is
the issue with Axis during the deployment phase that requires this
to be set?
--
Jeremy
On Aug 8, 2006, at 5:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rineholt
Date: Tue Aug 8 17:47:33 2006
New Rev
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-609?page=all ]
Jeremy Boynes closed TUSCANY-609.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied thanks
> Remove dependency on Geronimo work manager
> --
>
>
The deployer should never need the TCCL to be adjusted. What is the
issue with Axis during the deployment phase that requires this to be
set?
--
Jeremy
On Aug 8, 2006, at 5:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rineholt
Date: Tue Aug 8 17:47:33 2006
New Revision: 429905
URL: http://svn
The purpose of RuntimeInfo is to provide information about the runtime:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200607.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and see the JavaDoc at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/spi/src/
main/java/org/apache/tuscany/spi/services/i
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-609?page=all ]
Jeremy Boynes reassigned TUSCANY-609:
-
Assignee: Jeremy Boynes
> Remove dependency on Geronimo work manager
> --
>
>
I tried applying this but email seems to have messed up the patch.
Please could you open a JIRA and attach a new diff to it.
Thanks
--
Jeremy
On Aug 5, 2006, at 3:11 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jeremy,
I have removed the dependency on Geronimo work manager (connector
and transaction jars
On Aug 8, 2006, at 3:15 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
Having an XMLStreamHelper.INSTANCE sounds reasonable, scoped to the
TypeHelper.INSTANCE singleton.
Please no. INSTANCE is a real anti-pattern and we should be looking
to remove them rather than add more.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Ken Tam wrote:
It seems like belongs as one extension, of which there
are multiple implementations (which would be packaged and deployed
separately). I'm not sure nesting (either via inclusion or
containment) is the right approach though -- since you could have
mult
To submit the account request, please could you tell me the username
you would like to have?
--
Jeremy
On Aug 8, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Thanks a lot for voting me in.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 August
Passed with +1's from:
jboynes
jmarino
kwilliams
robbinspg
jsdelfino
rineholt
kentam
and no -1's.
I would like to welcome Meeraj as a committer and will start the
process of setting up his account.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 3, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote
With Jim away we may not be able to address all the issues here. It
might be better to repost some of these (especially any relating to
wiring) to the mailing list.
Another thing for the chat could be to finish the discussion on the
use of WSDL and the general representation of service cont
On Aug 4, 2006, at 4:05 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
A while back, we decided to express operations using
java.lang.Method. People have raised this as an issue when dealing
with implementation types that may not use Java interfaces to
represent services. This has also been problematic in dealing w
On Aug 4, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Yang Lei wrote:
Hello,
With M1 Driver, I can load a sca.module by creating a
StAXLoaderRegistry and
registering loaders into it. I wonder if Tuscany has a better way
for me to
get a StAXLoaderRegistry (or some other instance) fully loaded
with all the
loader
On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Fuhwei Lwo wrote:
I have verified it works and make a comment in the JIRA.
Thanks Fuhwei.
Yang, does this resolve the issue and can we close the JIRA?
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Aug 4, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Fuhwei Lwo wrote:
I remember a discussion in the past mentioned to use SDO annotation
in the XSD to override the default type name for SDO codegen tool,
e.g. sdoXML:name="MyNewTypeName".
Can anyone verify whether this is working? Thanks.
How about giving
On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:29 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
Folks,
many thanks for the votes. How does it work now? I have a
feeling my
nominator might be expected to initiate a process or 2 to get me up
and
running as a committer, but Frank is now on vacation. If this is
the case
could I pu
Rick
Not sure if you meant to commit this as part of this change - it
wasn't mentioned in the commit message at all.
Jervis,
Another way to handle spaces in the URL which might be a little
simpler is:
Index: core/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/core/services/artifact/
LocalMavenReposit
and so on.
If somebody can help me with Edit permissions I am most willing to
start
with this myself :-)
Thanks
- Venkat
On 8/3/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 3, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Yang Lei (JIRA) wrote:
> Need a extendable way
Good idea - can you do a patch for this?
--
Jeremy
On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:18 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
Now that the OSOA site is open to all and it has all specs, could
we link
the spec documents posted on the page
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/documentation.html to the
corresp
On Aug 3, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
On 8/3/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
An essential observation here is that users will typically be
exposing services in the server rather than applications.
Quick terminology question -- you're classifying "applica
On Aug 3, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Rick wrote:
Hello core folks! :-)
Line 67 a quick scan of the spec and I don't see any target
attribute on Service. Seems if there is a binding and no target
on line 86 an exception is thrown. Target doesn't seem to do much
either.
Cheers!
I seem to rememb
I would like to nominate Meeraj to become a committer on Tuscany - he
has been active in the project for quite a while now, contributing
the original Groovy container implementation, a work manager
implementation for use by async invocations and has worked to debug
several problems includin
On Aug 3, 2006, at 11:24 AM, ant elder wrote:
Hi David.
Very topical question! You get the NPE as you're not running in an SCA
runtime. You can run the sample outside of eclipse as described in
this
email:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200607.mbox/
browser.
Doing
+1
On Aug 2, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
I'd like to propose that we make Kelvin a committer. Kelvin has
made many
contributions to the SDO project:
- helped design -noEMF generator patterns and contributed tests for
those
patterns
- provided SDO design and M1 user documentati
We've talked a lot recently about issues booting the server inside
the build environment in order to be able to test application code. I
think one way we might be able to solve this is through a client-side
test harness that can be integrated into Maven and Ant.
An essential observation her
On Aug 3, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Yang Lei (JIRA) wrote:
Need a extendable way to register SCDL loaders
--
Key: TUSCANY-593
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-593
Project: Tuscany
Issue
On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:16 AM, Ken Tam wrote:
> How about pushing extension handling down into the Launcher so that
> all hosts using that will pick up that functionality? It should
> scan/deploy extensions at runtime boot-time, plus expose APIs so
that
> extensions can be deployed dynamically
Forwarded for Meeraj as he is having email issues.
--
Jeremy
Begin forwarded message:
From: "meeraj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: August 2, 2006 1:45:08 PM PDT
To: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jim Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL
On Aug 2, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
Some thoughts..
How about pushing extension handling down into the Launcher so that
all hosts using that will pick up that functionality? It should
scan/deploy extensions at runtime boot-time, plus expose APIs so that
extensions can be deployed dynam
On Aug 2, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
Normally, I would have just applied the fix but I'm in the middle
of some other uncommitted work I can't separate out. Do you mind
checking this out when you get a chance to see it behaves properly
with the work manager changes and then submittin
rg/xmlns/sca/1.0";
xmlns:rmi="
http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/binding/rmi/1.0-SNAPSHOT";
name="HelloWorldComposite">
HelloWorldServiceComponent
Is this right? What purpose does it server if it is indeed right?
On Aug 1, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
Yea for some reason it's not picking it up on my machine. Have any
idea what may be happening since you have the same box as me?
I don't think it does it automatically - I always have to set it
manually before checking in. I typically do an "svn
On Aug 1, 2006, at 4:49 PM, ant elder wrote:
Is there an import.wsdl function or anything similar for defining
wsdl files
in scdl implemented yet in the new code base?
IIRC the spec group had murmured something about using the WSDL2.0
wsdlLocation attribute e.g.
and I think the Interf
Splitting into a different thread
On Aug 1, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
Proposal 4: We need a test suite for each distribution that mirrors
user experience
Rationale: When a user installs a distribution it's helpful if it
works.
...
We can't do this every time we build as not everyone wi
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:44 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
done, thanks for the reminder
Thanks - now we can both remind Jim the next time he forgets ;-)
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
I was seeing a ScopeNotFoundException rather than an NPE I think, but
yeah, it happened when a component defaulted to STATELESS scope (in
the absence of an @Scope("MODULE")). I talked with Jim and we came to
this fix together.
OK - thanks for fixing
And please set the svn:ignore property for bigbank
Thanks
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
801 - 900 of 1609 matches
Mail list logo
