Here's the next batch of things I've noticed about the annotator release.
In the main uima build, doing a mvn install mutliple times doesn't cause
the docbook PDF generation to be re-run (if the source hasn't changed),
but in the sandbox distr, it does. (Haven't investigated why).
The POM
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
[...]
Running the mvn install gave a build failure in running the test for
Apache UIMA Simple Server:
Running org.apache.uima.simpleserver.test.ServerTest
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.uima.simpleserver.util.JettyUtils.getHost
Issues building CasEditor
First I tried mvn install - that said this wasn't a maven-buildable
project.
Then I looked and saw there was a build.xml in the build-files
directory. I tried running that with Ant - that failed because I hadn't
checked out uimaj-ep-runtime into the same directory
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
[...]
Running the mvn install gave a build failure in running the test
for Apache UIMA Simple Server:
Running org.apache.uima.simpleserver.test.ServerTest
java.lang.NullPointerException
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
I'm trying to build the sandbox annotator distr from SVN - I started
with an extract from the current level in SVN (trunk). I cd to
SandboxDistr, and did mvn install.
You cannot build the Sandbox from trunk since it has some dependencies
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Here's the next batch of things I've noticed about the annotator release.
In the main uima build, doing a mvn install mutliple times doesn't cause
the docbook PDF generation to be re-run (if the source hasn't changed),
but in the sandbox distr
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
[...]
Running the mvn install gave a build failure in running the test for
Apache UIMA Simple Server:
Running org.apache.uima.simpleserver.test.ServerTest
java.lang.NullPointerException
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
OK - I extracted the source zip file from mbaessler on people.a.o, added
the things needed to get docbook to run, and ran mvn install on the
sandboxDistr directory. It ran up to the SimpleServer and had the same
failure
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
[...]
OK - I extracted the source zip file from mbaessler on people.a.o,
added the things needed to get docbook to run, and ran mvn install on
the sandboxDistr directory. It ran up to the SimpleServer and had
the same failure
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Your machine is kaputt :-)
His machine is fine, it was able to build the Cas Editor.
Jörn
That's probably what broke it ;-)
LOL - Actually, I'm in the queue for a new machine. Mine is 3+ years
old, and has this nice feature: If you run code that
Can someone for whom the simple-server tests work, confirm these are the
right levels of software:
httpcore-4.0-alpha6.jar
log4j-1.2.8.jar
commons-logging-1.0.4.jar
servlet-api-2.5-6.1.8.jar
junit-4.0.jar
jetty-util-6.1.8.jar
commons-codec-1.3.jar
jetty-6.1.8.jar
servlet-api-2.4.jar
More info: Running the failing test (ServerTest) from Eclipse using
run-as Junit, works reliably...
Time to look at what's different between this and maven's running of it...
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Can someone for whom the simple-server tests work, confirm these are
the right levels
these from my repository, along with
maven-test and maven-surefire-reports, for good measure, and re-ran.
This caused maven to download the current (latest = 2.4.2) version of
the surefire plugin, so now things are working :-)
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
More info: Running the failing test
see it has been moved up a level ...
-Marshall
Thanks,
Tong
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem solved !
A search of the web using the search string surefile @beforeclass turned
up a surefire issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-448
Thilo Goetz (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz resolved UIMA-989.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This fixes the issue for me. Can anybody confirm, or
Thilo Goetz (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12589580#action_12589580 ]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-992:
--
There's an ant script in the
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Problem solved !
A search of the web using the search string surefile @beforeclass
turned up a surefire issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-448
which, in turn, implied that one should be using surefire version 2.4.2.
Of course, our
Michael Baessler wrote:
- All release files (NOTICE, README, RELEASE NOTES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE) are in
place and up-to-date
- All jar files have correct manifest files and also contains the NOTICE,
DISCLAIMER and LICENSE
files
- We finished the testing according the uimaj-2.2.2 annotator
Marshall Schor wrote:
Part of the IP clearance process for a software grant is to have an
official vote accepting the donation into the project. See
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html.
In order to fulfill the requirements of the template, please cast your
vote
), is a
member of the Incubator PMC.
Should we now post something to the Incubator general list, asking for
another vote by incubator PMC members, so we have a binding vote?
Thanks.
-Marshall Schor
Thilo Goetz (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12590472#action_12590472 ]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-998:
--
I think we should distinguish
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
In looking at this, I noticed that this vote was done *after* the
ip-clearance form was committed to SVN at the official place. I'm
not sure what the reviewers look at, but my guess is that they focus
on the ip-clearance form, and (possibly
on people.a.o/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uima-as/01.
The rat reports look good.
Please help test this - see the test plan :-) on the wiki
http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplanas222.html
Note that this test plan was kind of thrown together by yours truly, and
could (I'm sure) be
It's been more than 72 hours (excluding weekends) since this vote was
posted. This vote passes with all committers voting +1, and no other votes.
+1 Jörn Kottmann
+1 Thilo Goetz
+1 Adam Lally
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Michael Baessler
+1 Edward Epstein
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Part
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
on people.a.o/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uima-as/01.
The rat reports look good.
Please help test this - see the test plan :-) on the wiki
http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplanas222.html
Note that this test plan was kind of thrown together
Thilo Goetz wrote:
snip
3) IMO its better if the jars include the version number - which they
do for the maven repo, but not the ones in the binary distro
I personally agree with you, but we had a long discussion about
this and the no version numbers in jar names faction carried
the day. I
Marshall Schor wrote:
Because we're releasing lots of new stuff, I think our webpages need
some updating. Here's a proposal:
1) home page: add short paragraphs for uima-as, annotators, tools
(CasEditor), simple-server - the set of things in the sandbox we're
releasing this time around
in schor/uima-release-candidates/uima-as/02
This should be identical to the 01 release, except that the base uima
build for 02 is exactly the uima-2.2.2-05 release candidate ( see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1010).
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
As you may have seen, the vote for the UIMA core release passed on Incubator.
What are the next steps:
1) Upload the release artifacts to the Incubator Maven repository
2) Make the release artifacts available on the UIMA download page
3) Create/publish/update the
in directory uima-release-candidates/uima-as/03/
-Marshall
I also removed the .htaccess file from there, which was redirecting
eclipse-update-site to eclipseUpdateSite.
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
I also removed the .htaccess file from there, which was redirecting
eclipse-update-site to eclipseUpdateSite.
-Marshall
I still see only version 2.2.1. when using
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/uima/eclipse-update-site
eclipse-update-site won't be working until tomorrow. I posted to infra
and got this clarification:
While file adds/updates are synced hourly, file deletes are only
synced once per night. Wait until tomorrow and things should be
cleared up. (Or put back an empty .htaccess temporarily and things
Michael Baessler wrote:
I think we are ready to announce the new Apache UIMA releases.
best to wait until tomorrow, due to eclipse-update-site synching.
- UIMA base framework, version 2.2.2-incubating
- UIMA Annotator Addons, verison 2.2.2-incubating
The release is available for download
Michael Baessler wrote:
Is this by design? Should we never link download.html?
yes - this is the convention for mirrored sites.
Any way to fix this automatically?
We could change download.html to be a non-mirror-enabled page, just with
general info about the versions, and have links
Hi Mikhail,
We appreciate your input - I find the OSGi stuff complex. I've
attempted to reply to your concerns below, but please respond if I'm not
understanding, or have perhaps misunderstood some detail about how OSGi
/ Eclipse is supposed to work :-)
Mikhail Sogrin (JIRA) wrote:
Re: where to get Jars for builds -
How about getting them from the local Maven Repo, using the maven
version info?
This implies that the builder has run some process which insures the
local repo has
the right tagged build of the particular version of the plugin, and
works even if the
version
Looks right. Minor comments below
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Roberto Franchini wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Michael Baessler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Altogether sounds good to me, I'm interessted :-)
I shown this thread to my linguistics (collegues) and we are
interested
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Shouldn't we have a vote first? We shouldn't make Michael
go through the trouble of obtaining a sw grant just to turn
down the donation.
OK. -Marshall
--Thilo
Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1033?page
Michael Tanenblatt has offered to donate ConceptMapper to Apache UIMA.
There was some discussion on the uima-users list about this.
Thread: http://markmail.org/message/mfuubh5are7vs5ua
Please vote on whether or not to accept this donation (conditional on
receiving a software grant for it, of
All committers have voted +1 to accept this.
Voting +1
Joern Kottmann
Marshall Schor
Thilo Goetz
Michael Baessler
Eddie Epstein
Adam Lally
Voting 0 - none
Voting -1 - none
The vote passes.
As soon as we get a software grant recorded by the secretary, we can put
the code into SVN
While proof reading the uima-as documentation, I discovered a lot of
weird lines, for instance:
(from the Deployment Descriptor programlisting documentation)
service u b r f A e = x x i i i l !-- must have only 1 --
Investigation of this source file showed a host of these errors (random
).
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
While proof reading the uima-as documentation, I discovered a lot of
weird lines, for instance:
(from the Deployment Descriptor programlisting documentation)
service u b r f A e = x x i i i l !-- must have only 1 --
Investigation of this source file showed
If I delete the local maven repository and then do a maven build of
uimaj and uimaj-as, I see in the maven repo multiple versions of the
same artifacts being downloaded. For instance, in the .m2 repo is
org/mortbay/jetty/jetty in version 6.0.1, 6.1.4, and 6.1.5.
Likewise, the Spring
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Since I haven't the foggiest what that means, I don't
have an opinion.
The fog may lift after you read this page: http://apache.org/dev/crypto.html
Cheers. -Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Per the discussion on the thread here
http://markmail.org/search/?q=uima%20export
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Since I haven't the foggiest what that means, I don't
have an opinion.
The fog may lift after you read this page:
http://apache.org/dev/crypto.html
Not much. We're just saying that our software is using
encryption and we're
Ken -
Background: UIMA-AS makes use of Apache ActiveMQ. It recently came to
our attention that Apache ActiveMQ is classified for export under the
5D002 regulation. Because of this, UIMA-AS, which uses ActiveMQ and
plans to distribute it with the UIMA-AS release (not yet done, but
soon...)
Is available on people.a.o/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uima-as/05/
Thanks for testing :-) and reporting status on our wiki (under Releases
- Test Plan for UIMA-AS 2.2.2
-Marshall
This candidate should be identical with the 05, with the exception of
fixing 3 error messages which were using the wrong resource bundle keys,
and the inclusion of the export classification in the READMEs.
I hope we can conclude testing this week and tentatively plan to post a
vote to approve
Ahmed Abdeen(Home) wrote:
Hello UIMA Developers,I am getting the following error when I run the UIMA
Document Analyzer.
However, If I use the interactive mode it works fine. I can't specify what
is the source file of this issue. I would appreciate any help.
Thanks,
Ahmed
Please see
Thilo Goetz (JIRA) wrote:
Some applications may break if they require == between instances of the
same JCas object. Other of course won't care. So - it's good for this
to be configurable.
It might be good, also, to put in soft references for this - which
will be reclaimed if memory gets
This includes 2 fixes: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1054
(re-opened) and http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1073
Release candidate 07 was never completed.
Thanks for testing :-) Maybe this one will go. There are known issues
in Jira that are tracking things to be fixed
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz (JIRA) wrote:
Some applications may break if they require == between instances of
the same JCas object. Other of course won't care. So - it's good
for this to be configurable.
Any annotator that works with this assumption is broken IMO
/lib/uimaj-as-jms.jar and
apache-uima-as.08/lib/uimaj-as-jms.jar differ
Eddie
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This includes 2 fixes:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1054(re-opened) and
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1073
Release
Michael Baessler wrote:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
On Jun 13, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Michael Baessler wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Yes I think you can build the next Release Candidate.
I just replied to the CAS Editor build script mail with some comments.
I'm wondering if this would help our community building?
-Marshall
Actually, UIMA is already being tracked by this site.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
I'm wondering if this would help our community building?
-Marshall
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hello,
I think it would be very interesting for our users to be able to
use documents in various formarts as input for UIMA.
Should we start a sandbox project to write a tika annotator ?
+1 - yes, that would be great!
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
After running some tests on uima-as on a clean windows machine, I
connected a jmx console to the broker and watched it idle (i.e., no
uima activity was running) for several hours, overnight, and can see
there is no memory leaks. There is some behavior that I don't
My mail client seemed to strip the images - I'm retrying using another
mail client - maybe this will work...
After running some tests on uima-as on a clean windows machine, I
connected a jmx console to the broker and watched it idle (i.e., no uima
activity was running) for several hours,
Marshall Schor wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
After running some tests on uima-as on a clean windows machine, I
connected a jmx console to the broker and watched it idle (i.e., no
uima activity was running) for several hours, overnight, and can see
there is no memory leaks. There is some
Marshall Schor wrote:
My mail client seemed to strip the images - I'm retrying using another
mail client - maybe this will work...
After running some tests on uima-as on a clean windows machine, I
connected a jmx console to the broker and watched it idle (i.e., no
uima activity was running
Marshall Schor wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
After running some tests on uima-as on a clean windows machine, I
connected a jmx console to the broker and watched it idle (i.e.,
no uima activity was running) for several hours, overnight, and can
see there is no memory
Marshall Schor wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
My mail client seemed to strip the images - I'm retrying using
another mail client - maybe this will work...
After running some tests on uima-as on a clean windows machine, I
connected a jmx console to the broker and watched it idle (i.e
When running TestUimaAsExtended junit test, the
testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed. But when
rerunning, it ran OK. The failure was a resource initialization exception.
Anyone else see this intermittant failure?
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper
has been received and recorded.
This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we
create a new project in the
Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new
assembly:assembly. What part of the process is needed it?
-Marshall
Eddie
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When running TestUimaAsExtended junit test, the
testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed. But when rerunning,
it ran OK
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
How should we call it ?
Any ideas ?
Either something cute referring to Tika, or something that's
explainitory, like textExtractionFromArtifacts or ??
Jörn
On Jun 19, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hello,
I think it would be very
Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530522 ]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-536:
-
hmmm. We need to get legal-discuss
Eddie Epstein wrote:
Well, the problem was nothing to do with base UIMA, rather it was due to me
running mvn package instead of mvn install. Not sure if this is an issue
or not, but certainly not a blocking issue for release.
mvn package stops before installing the package into the local
Thilo Goetz (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz updated UIMA-1085:
--
Description:
The sandbox notice files currently all look like this:
NOTICE
Michael Baessler wrote:
Initial project setup is done. See issue UIMA-1033 for details
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1033
Michael T. please check the readme.txt and add updates about the Software Grant
if necessary.
I think we need an IP Clearance Form done for this. Any
Marshall Schor wrote:
Cawley, Tim wrote:
Bug in class org.apache.uima.tools.cpm.CpmPanel.displayProgress()
Mehtod will always throw a ArrayIndexOutOfBounds if one of the
Progress[] elements does not have Units of Progress.ENTITIES
I had a look at the code - it looks like the Progress array
We have finished testing this release candidate and there are no
remaining issues that need to be fixed for this release (some issues in
Jira are intentionally deferred to subsequent releases).
The release artifacts are available on
people.a.o/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uima-as/08,
Marshall Schor wrote:
We have finished testing this release candidate and there are no
remaining issues that need to be fixed for this release (some issues
in Jira are intentionally deferred to subsequent releases).
The release artifacts are available on
people.a.o/~schor/uima-release
Eddie Epstein wrote:
I think it is a good idea to provide a hotfix for problems deemed to be
important enough. How will we deal with additional hotfixes? Will they all
remain available? for the duration of the release or longer? When the next
release is made, will there be a final release for
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
Space/Time tradeoffs in the CAS
---
Key: UIMA-1089
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1089
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Improvement
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
We have finished testing this release candidate and there are no
remaining issues that need to be fixed for this release (some issues in
Jira are intentionally deferred to subsequent releases).
The release artifacts are available on
people.a.o
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall, I know you're interested in this. Are you
following site-dev for us (I'm not)?
I didn't know (or if I did know, I've forgotten :-) ) about site-dev and
am not reading it. I'll take a look, though.
-Marshall
--Thilo
Original Message
Subject:
The documentation for this says:
The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead. I think the actual
number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit java),
per JCas object, plus the overhead of holding on to the actual JCas
cover instances longer than needed. This latter
Could someone who understands this specify how the default is set
(update the documentation)? A quick look at the code seem to default it
to true in some cases, and in other cases, to the value set by the
resource org.apache.uima.impl.performanceTuning.properties (which as
shipped, sets it to
Michael Baessler wrote:
I have successfully verified/tested the memory fixes for release
uima-2.2.2-fp1-incubating.
The release artifacts are available on
people.a.o/~mbaessler/uima-2.2.2-fp1/02
For the fixpack we ship the uima-core.jar and a readme packaged as zip
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
The documentation for this says:
The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead. I think the actual
number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit java),
per JCas object, plus the overhead of holding on to the actual JCas
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
The documentation for this says:
The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead. I think the actual
number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit java),
per JCas
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hello,
the changes Thilo suggest are now included, UIMA-1093 and UIMA-1094.
The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at
/home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/02
So please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-02 is ready and can be
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hello,
the changes Thilo suggest are now included, UIMA-1093 and UIMA-1094.
The release artifacts are available on people.apache.org at
/home/joern/distributions/CasEditor-2.2.2/02
So please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 release candidate CasEditor-2.2.2-02 is ready and can be
Result:
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Joern Kottmann
+1 Adam Lally
+1 Thilo Goetz
+1 Michael Baessler
+1 Edward Epstein
No 0 or -1 votes received; the vote was held open 72 hours.
The vote passes. I will ask for IPMC review and approval.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
We have finished
Marshall Schor wrote:
Result:
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Joern Kottmann
+1 Adam Lally
+1 Thilo Goetz
+1 Michael Baessler
+1 Edward Epstein
No 0 or -1 votes received; the vote was held open 72 hours.
The vote passes. I will ask for IPMC review and approval.
I just noticed
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
The documentation for this says:
The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead. I think the
actual number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit
java), per JCas object, plus the overhead of holding on to the actual
JCas cover
The JCas Cache is a specialized hash table that enables iterators and
reference following from CAS Feature Structures to return the exact same
JCas cover Java instance that was previously returned. Besides avoiding
some GC overhead for the alternative (which is to create a new Java
object
Jun 2008 13:22:20 -0400
From: Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:20 PM
Subject: svn commit: r672825 - in /infrastructure/site/trunk
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
[...]
4) The POM included in the Jar under the maven directory shows the
parent of this artifact to be the pom org.apache.uima : uimaj :
2.2.2-01-incubating. I think this means that when maven
Eddie Epstein wrote:
Tong,
We have confirmation that the software grant for the CAS Viewer has been
received at Apache. Please create a Jira issue for the code submission and
when ready attach your source package to the issue.
Regards,
Eddie
Please include the md5 hash signature as an
I'm thinking about some re-org of our SVN layout based on these observations
-We're getting a lot of components. Many of these are on somewhat
different release cycles.
-We initially had a main node, a cpp node, a site note and a sandbox
node. The sandbox was for new-ish things. As some
Tong Fin has attached the code and documentation for a Cas Viewer
Eclipse Plugin to a Jira issue
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/uima-1102
The documentation includes a table that compares the functionality of
this with other tooling (see the 4th attachment on the Jira issue).
A
Marshall Schor wrote:
Tong Fin has attached the code and documentation for a Cas Viewer
Eclipse Plugin to a Jira issue
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/uima-1102
The documentation includes a table that compares the functionality of
this with other tooling (see the 4th attachment
to investigate; I think it probably will occur over
time. There are some differences for now, especially in packaging - the
CAS Editor is an RCP tool, while the CAS Viewer is an Eclipse Plugin.
-Marshall
Jörn
On Jul 2, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
Tong Fin has attached the code
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Michael Baessler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Possible names for this other node might be: parts. Or we might
want
to have several names that categorized the kinds of things - such as
annotators, servers
, and, in
general, what the way forward might look like, over the longer term.
Finally, assuming the discussion proceeds to a point where it makes some
sense to have a vote, we will re-do a vote.
-Marshall
--Thilo
Marshall Schor wrote:
Tong Fin has attached the code and documentation for a Cas
I been asking web-site pros if they would be interested in
volunteering to help improve our website, and found a couple of people
who said yes!
The main thing I told them I was hoping for was that we were intent on
building community - and changes in the web site that promoted this
would be
601 - 700 of 2550 matches
Mail list logo
