JohnSwenson wrote:
This RTC stuff is interesting. On my system I just automatically set
up a reserved address in my router so it gets the same IP address all
the time. Anything I'm going to be SSHing into or accessing a webgui on
I just put in a reserved address for and I never worry about
Triode wrote:
I wouldn't add an RTC for dhcp usage...
Exactly! We don't need to add any hardware complexity to deal with this.
JackOfAll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3069
View this thread:
Triode wrote:
Can you do cat /proc/asound/cards and post what is says?
It says, Triode has lost genius status! ;)
JackOfAll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3069
View this thread:
Triode wrote:
I wouldn't add an RTC for dhcp usage... There are plenty of devices
which support dhcp and they should either be used to allowing the
address to change or the server should be preconfigured to hand out a
static address. If there are other reasons then lets discuss (not sure
JohnSwenson wrote:
The lack of a battery backed RTC caused lots of problems for people
using the Touch as a server in areas where they didn't have internet
access so couldn't use NTP. Part of the problem with the Touch was no
way to easily set the time.
I know using the server isn't the
Triode wrote:
We can definately add a set clock applet for jivelite and also something
from the web interface if this is the likely problem area - really
depends on the long term accuracy of the clock too though. I don't
think this should distract us from our initial build though.
I
bakker_be wrote:
I'm not really too good at writing instructions, you've done a way
better job than I could, so I'd say you do it yourself and document it
accordingly ;)
I've followed the guides below, in the order listed:
Before doing:
I should have first copied the contents of that
Chunkywizard wrote:
I don't want to over simplify this but basically you format the USB
stick correctly, mount it where the cache is and that's it? If you don't
want to rescan it is advisable to copy the contents of the cache first
and copy back to the stick once it's mounted, yes? I'll have
Ah o.k., good to know thanks. I'll have a good at this sometime (it's on
my growing list of things to play with!)
CW
Chunkywizard's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=25868
View this thread:
@bakker_be:
During the tests I did with LMS I had it connected wireless (no Ethernet
connected). My music library resides on my NAS and contains a bit over
11000 songs. It scanned the whole thing in 12 minutes. If I would
extrapolate my results on a 7 songs library it would scan for about
76
dsdreamer wrote:
Anyway, my suspicion is that this is the main cause of DHCP
misbbehaviour on the Wandboard I've been seeing. Comments?
Humour me, what misbehaviour are you talking about?
JackOfAll's Profile:
Pascal Hibon wrote:
If I would extrapolate my results on a 7 songs library it would scan
for about 76 minutes.
You're making an assumption, (a wrong one), that scan time will be
linear no matter how big the library.
JackOfAll wrote:
You're making an assumption, (a wrong one), that scan time will be
linear no matter how big the library.
Sure, however, even if the scanning process increases over time (or
number of songs) there is still a huge difference between 1 hour and 11
hours. I dont have such a big
Pascal Hibon wrote:
The Wandboard seems quite powerfull so Im a bit surprised by
bakker_bes results.
The limiting factor isn't WB CPU power, or network speed, it's down to
disk I/O speed, reading and writing the sqlite db files. That's the
whole point of getting those files off of the
Maybe the overall physical size of the library is a factor too? I've got
around 1.5 TB of music, it's all quite extensively tagged and cover art
is as large as I can find. MusicIP (only mixable status) SmartMix are
activated as well.
I don't say that there cannot be anything wrong with my
Hi there,
Has anybody had trouble with the inboard LMS displaying album art? None
of mine is showing. I have album art embedded in the mp3sand also in
each folder as folder.jpg. My art files are big, basically the maximum
resolution I could source so can be 1-4MB, is there a maximum size the
JackOfAll wrote:
Humour me, what misbehaviour are you talking about?
All the other devices on my network are allowed to keep their existing
IP address when time comes up for renewal. By contrast, CSOS on
Wandboard never gets to keep its old IP address. Also, DHCP leases are
issued for 24 hours
Triode wrote:
I am keen to get feedback on this change as it changes how jivelite
starts up first time. To try to support TVs and monitors which only do
1080p and thoses which only do 720p, this version starts up in VGA mode
and then asks you to select a skin. I am working on the basis
Chunkywizard wrote:
Hi there,
Has anybody had trouble with the inboard LMS displaying album art? None
of mine is showing. I have album art embedded in the mp3sand also in
each folder as folder.jpg. My art files are big, basically the maximum
resolution I could source so can be 1-4MB, is
Pascal Hibon wrote:
Ive been playing with jivelite for the first time yesterday.
Im happy to report that it works like a charm. The initial setup screen
is great and works very well. I was able to go back and forward between
several screen resolutions without any issues. It is even a very
Chunkywizard wrote:
My TV is 1080P and I saw 3 menu options (including settings) at the top
of the screen, and that menu was replicated 3 times all at the top of
the screen side by side. I selected settings and the 1080P screen then
it all worked fine.
CW
I connected everything while
The attach patch shows how I've managed to get a sane DHCP lease after
[re]boots of the Wandboard.
Let me acknowledge that I got my main idea to work around this problem
from Eli Billauer's blog post linked here:
http://billauer.co.il/blog/2012/10/dhcp-ip-ntpdate-rtc/His
description of the
dsdreamer wrote:
It is surely unlikely that the bad date-stamps would be benign as far as
DHCP behaviour is concerned?
I'll take a look. Of the top of my head, I would expect it to be benign.
Do you have a specific reason for 24 hour leases? Most routers default
to 7 days for dynamic leases,
JackOfAll wrote:
I'll take a look. Of the top of my head, I would expect it to be benign.
Do you have a specific reason for 24 hour leases? Most routers default
to 7 days for dynamic leases, and at the point the dhclient on the
device requests the renewal, it will request the renewal asking
dsdreamer wrote:
Apparently, different routers behave differently when when the client
fails to keep track of DHCP leases properly.
Both of my routers will allocate the same IP Address, (if it has already
been allocated but not yet expired), regardless of discover/request, to
the client which
Hi...
updated /etc/yum.conf
installonlypkgs=kernel kernel-bigmem installonlypkg(kernel-module)\
installonlypkg(vm) kernel-enterprise kernel-smp kernel-modules\
kernel-debug kernel-unsupported kernel-source kernel-devel\
kernel-PAE kernel-PAE-debug kernel-omap kernel-wand
sudo
JackOfAll wrote:
Both of my routers will allocate the same IP Address, (if it has already
been allocated but not yet expired), regardless of discover/request, to
the client which sends the MAC which the address was originally
allocated to.
Good to know, but I hope you are designing for a
JackOfAll wrote:
KERNEL-WAND-3.0.35-CM37+
For Pascal: Kernel to test with Triode's patch to use pll4 (audio) clock
for spdif output.
Changes...
Code:
* Sat May 04 2013 - 3.0.35-cm37+
- Triode as-patch4-spdif-pll4.patch. Use pll4 (audio) for spdif
@Triode, seems like you are a genius.
So that will mean that the optical out of the wandboard will also be
usable (after soldering), till the Community Dac boards arrive.
To think that I nearly left SB for Sonos, glad I did not since the real
fun is just about to start.
JackOfAll wrote:
Not so much that, more a case that I was trying to draw attention to
your SPDIF board. If have have a much larger original image, I'll crop
that to provide a higher-res 640xXXX image of the daughter board, with a
link to the full image. (The rule of thumb I was given by the
Pascal Hibon wrote:
Let me know if you need other copies of the images. I can send you them
in the format and resolution you like.
Replied to your PM.
JackOfAll's Profile:
Pascal Hibon wrote:
Beatifull results...
'[image: http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/4674/sampleratescm37.jpg]'
(http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/827/sampleratescm37.jpg/)
Can you comment on the 192k results - I can don't get anything with
these but can play a lower sample rate
Triode wrote:
Can you comment on the 192k results - I can don't get anything with
these but can play a lower sample rate afterwards and they play ok - so
I want to check on the needs reboot comment?
Actually, I don't understand what Pascal is seeing. Squeezelite reports
max rate 192k back to
Triode wrote:
Can you comment on the 192k results - I can don't get anything with
these but can play a lower sample rate afterwards and they play ok - so
I want to check on the needs reboot comment?
Any view on the lock you get with these - I think they should work with
the MDAC set to
Pascal Hibon wrote:
Well, I did my tests while using plughw:CARD=imxspdif.
The Wandboard does not hang but it wont play anything else unitl it
is rebooted (when playing 192k files).
It is better to use hw:CARD=imxspdif.
With that option selected, the 352k8 file plays but the
Triode wrote:
What is running the server - does it have enough cpu to transcode at
these rates?
I doubt that's it. Even if it was the WB doing the sox transcoding,
downsampling takes less CPU than the crazy stuff I'm doing, eg.
upsampling everything to 384k, vhq filter. The WB has no issue
Triode wrote:
What is running the server - does it have enough cpu to transcode at
these rates?
ReadyNAS NVX (x86 proc).
It shoulb be ok: load averages: 0.28, 0.09, 0.06
Pascal Hibon's Profile:
Guys, I'll be ignoring you for the rest of the day. I've got a bunch of
stuff I wan't to get finished, so no more popping into the forum and
email is going to be ignored for the rest of the day! (Unless it's from
Triode! ;))
Pascal: Put your SPDIF board circuit diagram on the web site. It's just
bakker_be wrote:
I finally managed to find the time to correct my mess withe the
USB-stick mounted as cache, and the results are simply amazing. You
might remember I posted the scan results in the previous thread: a bit
over 11 hours for just shy of 7 tracks in standard configuration.
Chunkywizard wrote:
Any chance of some instructions on how to implement this? I've seen the
mount you have in your /etc/fstab but what else do you need to do?
CW
I'm not really too good at writing instructions, you've done a way
better job than I could, so I'd say you do it yourself and
albertone74 wrote:
Hi,
Just to share a few pictures of my setup:)
Clive,
Sorry for getting back to you late, I am still out of London. But I did
want write a few comments, so there we go!
I have been looking for a 'real' replacement for my so beloved
Squeezebox Touch that could also run
@JackOfAll,
On my Wandboard DHCP leases are being obtained before the chronyd or
ntpd have set the system clock, leading to rather comic DHCP lease
records such as the following:
Code:
lease {
interface wlan0;
fixed-address 10.0.1.98;
option subnet-mask
JackOfAll wrote:
'Image Gallery' (http://www.communitysqueeze.org/image_gallery.jsp)
lintweaker, dsdreamer, Pascal Hibon, and michaelvv.
Do you wan't to write a paragraph to accompany your images?
Sure, no problem!
Gentlemen, your website is really quite excellent. The FAQ and Quick
Start Guide instructions are accurate, thorough and well written.
My board arrived yesterday at 4 pm, and by 4:30 pm, I was listening to
music with headphones. Today I will set up wireless. I would have done
so initially, but I
Squeezed_Rotel wrote:
Gentlemen, your website is really quite excellent. The FAQ and Quick
Start Guide instructions are accurate, thorough and well written.
My board arrived yesterday at 4 pm, and by 4:30 pm, I was listening to
music with headphones. Today I will set up wireless. I would
bakker_be wrote:
The Hammond case is for the board John Swenson is developping.
Thanks. I now see that this info is in the FAQ. I found it after my
post.
Squeezed_Rotel's Profile:
Squeezed_Rotel wrote:
I also purchased the Hammond 1455T1601 case as specified in the guide.
The board is much smaller than the rails in this enclosure. Might I
assume that this Hammond enclosure is for the combined CSP / Wandboard
assembly?
Yes, perhaps we need to make that clearer in
I've added the user contributed text and Castalla's Cubieboard to the
'Image Gallery' (http://www.communitysqueeze.org/image_gallery.jsp).
Thank you!
JackOfAll's Profile:
JackOfAll wrote:
Yes, the JS DAC Carrier board will be available separately.
The default carrier board that comes with the Wandboard has a value of
less than 10 EURO's. The CPU card is the bulk of the cost. So by buying
a Wandboard now and the JS DAC Carrier board later, you will only be
yep, it needs updating, I'll do it when I have my head around github!
CW
Chunkywizard's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=25868
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98544
Squeezemenicely wrote:
So it seems this info is outdated and one will actually be able to
upgrade the excisting Wandboard with a separately available JS DAC card.
I'm still working on documentation. I've been working on a proper
index page for days, trying to give a complete overview and
you guys are doing a great job! These are exciting times. Wandboard here
I come ;-)
Squeezemenicely's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=41812
View this thread:
WANDBOARD-AVAHI-SERVICES-1.0-1
Service entries for ssh (22), http (80), slimhttp (9000), registered for
wandboard.local.
Changes...
Code:
* Wed Mar 06 2013 - 1.0-1
- Initial build.
Install...
Code:
sudo yum
JIVELITE-0.1-0.34.20130501GIT632203D
Changes...
Code:
* Tue Apr 30 2013 - 0.1-0.34.20130501git632203d
- Latest git revision 632203d.
- hide wallpaper options which do not match hd screen sizes.
* Tue Apr 30 2013 - 0.1-0.33.20130430git91b2d9f
- Latest git
COMMUNITY-SQUEEZE-WEB-1-50.20130504GITD9D2E3A
Changes...
Code:
* Sat May 04 2013 - 1-50.20130504gitd9d2e3a
- Latest git revision d9d2e3a.
Update...
Code:
sudo csos-cleanUpdate community-squeeze-web
JackOfAll wrote:
'Image Gallery' (http://www.communitysqueeze.org/image_gallery.jsp)
lintweaker, dsdreamer, Pascal Hibon, and michaelvv.
Do you wan't to write a paragraph to accompany your images?
Sorry for the delay but I have been tied up in work related stuff.
I like the idea to
Pascal Hibon wrote:
Thses are the results acording to the M-DAC:
'[image: https://imageshack.us/scaled/large/692/samplerateresultsh.jpg]'
(http://imageshack.us/photos/my-images/692/samplerateresultsh.jpg/)
Note that the error rate for 176k4 is still too high. The M-DAC unlocks
a
Triode wrote:
Pascal - could you PM me an email address? Are you happy to help me
test a new kernel which I believe for spdif only gets accurate bitrates
for 88.2k (can't test at 176.4k but hope that will work too.) It
changes the internal pll used for spdif to be the audio one, so I don't
Pascal Hibon wrote:
Sorry for the delay but I have been tied up in work related stuff.
I like the idea to group these Community Squeeze projects together in
one place. I'm planning on posting some updates as my prototype evolves.
Here's my contribution:
Pascal,
I've added your text. (Hope
JackOfAll wrote:
Pascal,
I've added your text. (Hope you don't mind. I made a couple of small
edits.) I left the first image cropped-in on the WB and your spdif
board. Click on it and you get the full 640xXXX image. I also cropped
the second image.
'Image Gallery'
Pascal Hibon wrote:
I guess the full images would take up too much space.
Not so much that, more a case that I was trying to draw attention to
your SPDIF board. If have have a much larger original image, I'll crop
that to provide a higher-res 640xXXX image of the daughter board, with a
link to
KERNEL-WAND-3.0.35-CM37+
For Pascal: Kernel to test with Triode's patch to use pll4 (audio) clock
for spdif output.
Changes...
Code:
* Sat May 04 2013 - 3.0.35-cm37+
- Triode as-patch4-spdif-pll4.patch. Use pll4 (audio) for spdif clock.
I know this has been listed in the FAQs, but I would just like to point
out how important it would be for users willing to jump onboard and buy
a wandboard now - that there will be a DIY kit of the Gen 2.
Personally I think DIY is the best option anyway, since it will not
involve too much work
Squeezemenicely wrote:
I know this has been listed in the FAQs, but I would just like to point
out how important it would be for users willing to jump onboard and buy
a wandboard now - that there will be a DIY kit of the Gen 2.
Yes, the JS DAC Carrier board will be available separately.
Kuro wrote:
I can attached a 2.5 portable HDD to the USB OTG port.
Has anyone else actually tested this? I haven't. A mass storage device
connected to the OTG port should work, but it would be better if we
could give you a definitve answer from someone who has actually
connected a drive to
JackOfAll wrote:
Has anyone else actually tested this? I haven't. A mass storage device
connected to the OTG port should work, but it would be better if we
could give you a definitve answer from someone who has actually
connected a drive to the OTG port. Anyone?
Wouldn't that technically
jimbobvfr400 wrote:
Just a tip if you're fiddling. Win32discimager if that's what you're
using to write the img to the card can also create an img file from your
card as a backup. Good to have a backup after you do the initial setup.
Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk 2
Just a
Chunkywizard wrote:
I think the OPs reservation comes from that the fact it has not been
explicitly been stated that CSP2 will use the CPU card from the
Wandboard. I believe a single PCB design is still being considered.
Hopefully John can clarify the issue.
Single PCB design? Where are you
JackOfAll wrote:
Single PCB design? Where are you getting that from? There has never been
any intention to use anything other than a Wandboard CPU card with the
CSP2 board!
It's from one of John's posts, honest. It's probably out of date now! I
shall make the FAQ more explicit on the
Chunkywizard wrote:
It's from one of John's posts, honest. It's probably out of date now! I
shall make the FAQ more explicit on the subject.
You already did! ;) 'What hardware does it use?'
(http://www.communitysqueeze.org/faq.jsp#What_hardware_does_it_use.3F)
JackOfAll wrote:
You already did! ;) 'What hardware does it use?'
(http://www.communitysqueeze.org/faq.jsp#What_hardware_does_it_use.3F)
I'm going mad, it's this Wandboard, it's driving me crazy! ;-D
CW
Chunkywizard's
JackOfAll wrote:
You are plugging a USB stick into the OTG (not the host) port?
OK, I've checked the manuals, and I had the USB-port nomenclature
reversed, I actually use the HOST-port.
bakker_be's Profile:
'Image Gallery' (http://www.communitysqueeze.org/image_gallery.jsp)
lintweaker, dsdreamer, Pascal Hibon, and michaelvv.
Do you wan't to write a paragraph to accompany your images?
JackOfAll's Profile:
JackOfAll wrote:
'Image Gallery' (http://www.communitysqueeze.org/image_gallery.jsp)
lintweaker, dsdreamer, Pascal Hibon, and michaelvv.
Do you wan't to write a paragraph to accompany your images?
after work tonight, when I get home.
dsdreamer wrote:
after work tonight, when I get home.
Great! BTW, what make/model is the little silver DAC? (I figured out the
Black one was a REGA, but I'm not familair with the other.)
JackOfAll's Profile:
Hi,
Just to share a few pictures of my setup:)
+---+
|Filename: photo2.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=14776|
albertone74 wrote:
Just to share a few pictures of my setup:)
'Image Gallery' (http://www.communitysqueeze.org/image_gallery.jsp)
Added to the page. Can you please write a couple of sentences about what
is in the pics. It looks like the WB is connected to DacMagic?
JackOfAll wrote:
Can you please write a couple of sentences about what is in the pics.
Sure.
JackOfAll wrote:
It looks like the WB is connected to DacMagic?
Correct. When I took the picture it was connected to it.
JackOfAll wrote:
Great! BTW, what make/model is the little silver DAC? (I figured out the
Black one was a REGA, but I'm not familair with the other.)
@JackOfAll, some text for two of the images I contributed:
Here is a 3-box wireless streaming solution consisting of a Wandboard
running
dsdreamer wrote:
You have cloned the master branch instead of the 1.0-dev. The new
version doesn't require Perl at all and has a lot of things fixed in it.
You definitely want this one.
I see thank you,
dsdreamer wrote:
If you want an extensive Shairport dialog, let's not clog up
I'm moved the shairport rpm package into the repo. I hope it helps you
guys, but I'm not willing to provide any support for it. Anyone using it
needs to know what they are doing, that they need to stop and disable
squeezeboxserver (if you are using it) and squeezelite services before
enabling and
This isn't directed at anyone in particular. There is a bunch of stuff
in my head that I take for granted. If I put any removeable drive in
/etc/fstab, it is second nature to use noauto and nofail. Anyone adding
USB drive mounts to fstab, please use nofail,defaults. eg.
Code:
JackOfAll wrote:
This isn't directed at anyone in particular. There is a bunch of stuff
in my head that I take for granted. If I put any removeable drive in
/etc/fstab, it is second nature to use noauto and nofail. Anyone adding
USB drive mounts to fstab, please use nofail,defaults. eg.
castalla wrote:
Noob here:
Brian, you're not a noob! If there is a bug to be found anywhere, I'd
bet my last Rolo that you'd find it before anyone else! Beta tester from
hell. Yes! Noob. No! LOL.
castalla wrote:
So what would be the appropriate line, and where does the line actually
go?
JackOfAll wrote:
Brian, you're not a noob! If there is a bug to be found anywhere, I'd
bet my last Rolo that you'd find it before anyone else! Beta tester from
hell. Yes! Noob. No! LOL.
I'm not sure what the question is? You want to plug in a USB drive,
mount a partition from that
castalla wrote:
You're much too complimentary!
It amused me that you would describe yourself as a noob. That's not how
I think of you.
castalla wrote:
I've got a usb flash stick plugged into my router - as you see it's
mounted via cifs. So:
Do I need the 'fail' line, or not? Are you
JackOfAll wrote:
It amused me that you would describe yourself as a noob. That's not how
I think of you.
Yes, you can add nofail as an option for a remotefs. (I don't normally,
but then my file servers are up 24/7, 365 days a year.)
Code:
I'd also suggest adding _netdev to your fstab line if it's a CIFS
share, this makes sure the network is available before attempting to
mount.
Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk 2
jimbobvfr400's Profile:
I'm pretty sure 'nofail' is ignored on network shares - happy to be
proved wrong on that however. I have a couple of machines that use nfs
and cifs shares and I don't have problems when the servers are down /
sleeping - just a slower startup and a logged warning.
jimbobvfr400 suggestion is a
jimbobvfr400 wrote:
I'd also suggest adding _netdev to your fstab line if it's a CIFS
share, this makes sure the network is available before attempting to
mount.
Shouldn't be needed with systemd responsible for doing the mounting.
remote-fs-pre.target has a dependency on
Fair enough just something I do automatically for network shares, almost
without thinking about it. I will bow to your (massively so) superior
knowledge on this though.
Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk 2
slackhead wrote:
I'm pretty sure 'nofail' is ignored on network shares - happy to be
proved wrong on that however. I have a couple of machines that use nfs
and cifs shares and I don't have problems when the servers are down /
sleeping - just a slower startup and a logged warning.
Well,
JackOfAll wrote:
Well, nofail is ignored, in as much as the the remote share not being
available will not stall the boot process anyway. But, and this is
mainly cosmetic, by using nofail and the share not being available,
systemd won't mark the mount as having failed and the remote-fs.target
I'm debating whether I should get the Wandboard and get onboard. I've a
question:
I noticed that there are two USB ports on the Wandboard, a normal USB
port (host) and a USB OTG (On-The-Go) port. What I want to do is to
attach a USB to SP/DIF converter to the USB port, and also run LMS so I
O.k., there is something screwy with my setup here. On my latest image
(go 3), after the scan happened last night, I got the problem with the
plugin page again. Just now I shutdown the Wandboard using the UI. I
waited 3 minutes (to be sure, the UI said 30 seconds) and I pulled the
plug. I then
Chunkywizard wrote:
O.k., there is something screwy with my setup here. On my latest image
(go 3), after the scan happened last night, I got the problem with the
plugin page again. Just now I shutdown the Wandboard using the UI. I
waited 3 minutes (to be sure, the UI said 30 seconds) and I
Chunkywizard wrote:
Did the image work for you?
Yes, works fine! I'm going to ask another stupid question. You did have
an ethernet cable plugged in? The Wirless interface wasn't configured
with a network (ESSID) name or password, so you would have had to be
using ethernet.
Not that I really needed any confirmation about keeping images of wiring
and uncased circuit boards well away from anywhere where the general
public might accidentally stumble into them on a website, if you want
to be taken seriously...
A guy contacted me out of the blue a couple of days
Have you got a shed to keep this in?
castalla's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15624
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98544
You do realize that circuit diagrams are supposed to show the principles
of the circuit - they are not literal layout drawings! :)
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread:
1001 - 1100 of 1490 matches
Mail list logo
