cpd73 wrote:
> Just published a very early 0.0.1 release - see
> https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?117099-Announce-Melodeon
> for announcement.
That's great, and while saying so probably seems to be beating a dead
horse, I appreciate the publishing of the Debian package.
-
Just published a very early 0.0.1 release - see
https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?117099-Announce-Melodeon
for announcement.
*Material debug:* 1. Launch via http: //SERVER:9000/material/?debug=json
(Use http: //SERVER:9000/material/?debug=json,cometd to also see update
messages, e.
RobbH wrote:
> But that approach made for a misguided and unhelpful response to you.
> What was needed was simply to read what you wrote and refrain from
> inferring anything. This exchange has been a good reminder that that
> should always be an option.
>
Yes, quite right. Even a slight impro
brainchild wrote:
> Perhaps my enthusiasm about expressing a solution I considered as an
> ideal, and one which I think others might also share in principle,
> whether or not having considered it, appeared as a demand or rejection.
Thank you. That may have contributed to our misunderstanding, b
cpd73 wrote:
> What makes you think Electron is any more generic than Qt?
It's fine. I wasn't being critical. I think I probably have tied Qt more
closely than is accurate to KDE, due to a historical association.
brainc
brainchild wrote:
> May I ask why you chose to use a solution based on Qt, instead of a more
> generic one, such as a direct use of Electron?
What makes you think Electron is any more generic than Qt? Qt runs on
Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, iOS, and more. Electron, AFAIK, is more
about packa
RobbH wrote:
> Guilty as charged! I thought I had inferred what you wanted and found a
> way you might achieve that. My inference was wrong and I apologize.
Perhaps my enthusiasm about expressing a solution I considered as an
ideal, and one which I think others might also share in principle,
wh
cpd73 wrote:
> The "qwebappwrapper" is working (barring any bugs), and you can (and I
> already do) use this to access LMS. The newer app takes this one step
> further, makes it LMS specific, and adds features such as auto-discover
> of LMS and MPRIS (so that player controls, etc, are shown in P
brainchild wrote:
> Yes. Thank you. I think my original impression was that a working
> version was still forthcoming. If there is, in a sense, a phase that is
> already working, perhaps it would help to explain the difference between
> it and the part still under development.
The "qwebappwrapp
cpd73 wrote:
> As previously stated I have already written a Qt-based wrapper - this
> was to allow any page to be installed as a web-app. Now grated this
> means creating a .desktop file, but that is fairly easy (and an example
> LMS .desktop file is provided). Although not Electron based speci
brainchild wrote:
> Some of the suggestions were to migrate the existing web page into a
> distributable wrapper, such as one built through Electron. Doing so is a
> development project in its own right, which would benefit the community.
> That it would be distributable and of benefit to more t
brainchild wrote:
> Discussing what I generally am able or willing to do to my own
> system was not the reason I opened the discussion, and (without
> recalling every detail that I shared) I might suggest trying to avoid
> making inferences to such effect
Guilty as charged! I thought I
brainchild wrote:
> Some of the suggestions were to migrate the existing web page into a
> distributable wrapper, such as one built through Electron. Doing so is a
> development project in its own right, which would benefit the community.
> That it would be distributable and of benefit to more t
RobbH wrote:
> There have already been some misunderstandings in this thread, and I
> think we now have another one. I cannot speak for others who have posted
> suggestions, but when I posted the directions for manually installing
> SqueezePlay, I was under the mistaken impression that you wante
brainchild wrote:
> It would be quite nice if someone were interested in maintaining and
> distributing a project on behalf of the community.
>
> I think just mentioning ways that someone might attempt it, however, has
> become off topic.
>
> Thanks for the references, though. Perhaps it will
cpd73 wrote:
> Ah, I set an initial size of 1024x768. What I need to do is check the
> screen size, and set this appropriately.
Yes, that update works.
piTouch™ w/JustBoom DigiHat -> RME ADI-2 DAC FS -> JBL 305P MkII
monitors; LMS 8.2 on piCorePlayer/Pi 4; Material Skin.
chicks wrote:
> Also builds and runs under Armbian Linux on the 'Inovato Quadra'
> (https://www.inovato.com/). Not quite fitting the 7" 1024X600 display,
> cut off at the bottom, seems to think it's in portrait mode.
Ah, I set an initial size of 1024x768. What I need to do is check the
screen
Also builds and runs under Armbian Linux on the Inovato Quadra. Not
quite fitting the 7" 1024X600 display, cut off at the bottom.
39112
+---+
|Filename: dqDDgoKWQ8Od1hFk61SdlA.jpeg |
|Download: http://
cpd73 wrote:
> For what its worth, I've started writing a Qt based wrapper app for
> MaterialSkin - see https://github.com/CDrummond/lms-material-app-qt This
> is similar to my Android APK, in that it is a wrapper around a WebView
> that adds extras such as server auto-disovery, etc. Its in its e
For what its worth, I've started writing a Qt based wrapper app for
MaterialSkin - see https://github.com/CDrummond/lms-material-app-qt This
is similar to my Android APK, in that it is a wrapper around a WebView
that adds extras such as server auto-disovery, etc. Its in its early
stages, but shou
manx wrote:
> Nativefier (github.com/nativefier/nativefier) is a little open source
> program which allows you to turn any website/URL into an app with native
> integration. It uses Electron/Chromium and provides many options. It's
> easy to use.
> WebCatalog (webcatalog.io) is even easier to us
brainchild wrote:
> Thank you for the responses.
>
> I understand that Material Skin is a single-page web application that
> may be served from LMS or stored on a client. For a cleaner style, it
> may be preferred to load it from an application that operates as a
> standalone wrapper. In princi
brainchild wrote:
> Thank you for the responses.
>
> I understand that Material Skin is a single-page web application that
> may be served from LMS or stored on a client. For a cleaner style, it
> may be preferred to load it from an application that operates as a
> standalone wrapper. In princip
brainchild wrote:
> Thank you for the responses.
>
> I understand that Material Skin is a single-page web application that
> may be served from LMS or stored on a client. For a cleaner style, it
> may be preferred to load it from an application that operates as a
> standalone wrapper. In princi
Thank you for the responses.
I understand that Material Skin is a single-page web application that
may be served from LMS or stored on a client. For a cleaner style, it
may be preferred to load it from an application that operates as a
standalone wrapper. In principle, the application might be p
brainchild wrote:
> Someone mentioned that -Material Design- is a web page that may be run
> without a browser or even an Electron shell. I would like to understand
> this better.
Material -Skin- being a single-page Javascript web-app requires a HTML
redering engine - which a browser or Electro
I, too, would like to understand how a web page could be "run" without a
browser!
It can't. But there are a few ways to hide the fact that it's running a
web page. Electron is one of them. Many popular apps nowadays are
written using web technologies (JS, HTML, CSS), eg. Spotify, Slack, VS
Co
chicks wrote:
> Just for grins, installed Squeezeplay on my ChromeBox. While it's
> nicely suited to 7" touchscreens, it really isn't a desktop app. The
> Material Skin, saved as an "app", is far more intuitive and easier to
> navigate with a mouse.
>
>
Agreed.
But it does require a browse
Just for grins, installed Squeezeplay on my ChromeBox. While it's
nicely suited to 7" touchscreens, it really isn't a desktop app. The
Material Skin, saved as an "app", is far more intuitive and easier to
navigate with a mouse.
38920
+--
SqueezePlay running on Linux Mint 20.3 (sorry, I haven't upgraded to 21
yet):
38917
Although it COULD be playing music on the computer on which it is
running, at present it is simply controlling a player in a different
room.
Installing it is straightforward, following the directions on the
dow
slartibartfast wrote:
> Which Windows desktop front end are you referring to?
So many different variations of the theme have crossed my path that I
can't keep it all straight anymore.
brainchild's Profile: http://forums.
brainchild wrote:
> It seems Logitech had supported only Windows and MacOS officially for
> desktop front ends.
Which Windows desktop front end are you referring to?
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
slartibartfast
RobbH wrote:
> Where was this mentioned? I do not find any mention of Material Design
> in this thread, before your post. (I searched for the word "design" in
> this thread and your recent post was the only thing that came up.)
Seems I wrote -Material Design-, instead of -Material Skin-.
brainchild wrote:
> Someone mentioned that -Material Design- is a web page that may be run
> without a browser or even an Electron shell. I would like to understand
> this better.
Where was this mentioned? I do not find any mention of Material Design
in this thread, before your post. (I searche
Someone mentioned that -Material Design- is a web page that may be run
without a browser or even an Electron shell. I would like to understand
this better.
brainchild's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?use
I seem to have solved the start up problem :)
38908
ronnie
+---+
|Filename: Screenshot from 2022-10-17 10-32-10.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=38908|
+-
Jivelite was developed for a touch screen interface, although it does
work using a pointer on a desktop PC it's slow and awkward to navigate.
Why attempt to use Jivelite when there's the excellent "Material" plugin
available?
A few screen examples -
38904
38905
38906
38907
+--
@brainchild
This morning, whilst eating my porridge I installed Jivelite on an old
Shuttle computer running Linux Mint 20.3
I used the same build procedure that I utilised on an O2 Joggler running
Debian Bullseye.
I have to start it with a command line instruction in the terminal (on
the Joggl
Does the SqueezePlay controller have control over only the local player,
or any on the network?
SqueezePlay is the software initially created to run on
Controller/Radio/Touch. But it's available for desktop computers, too.
As its name says it's a player. But it can also be used to control any
brainchild wrote:
> To be clear, "LMS GUI" refers to the web page that is served by LMS when
> a browser requests from the machine on which LMS is running, correct?
>
MATERIAL SKIN CAN CONTROL ANY OF YOUR RENDERERS, INCLUDING SQUEEZELITE,
UPNP, CHROMECAST...
38902
+--
brainchild wrote:
> I am running Linux Mint 21 on an x86 laptop.
>
> What I have come to understand is that Jivelite is targeted for a player
> device such as a RPi running piCorePlayer, and that Squeeze Player is a
> desktop application that functions as a player for a media server, not a
> c
Greg Erskine wrote:
> I can read this 2 ways. :)
>
> The most significant point is the "material" skin plugin. It's a vast
> improvement over the standard skin. It is maintained almost daily. I
> think it is fair to say that "material" is taking over from the numerous
> apps that have been deve
brainchild wrote:
> To be clear, "LMS GUI" refers to the web page that is served by LMS when
> a browser requests from the machine on which LMS is running, correct?
I can read this 2 ways. :)
LMS GUI refers to the web page(s) that are served by LMS. There is a
little web server built into LMS.
Greg Erskine wrote:
> hi brainchild,
> For control on any computer with a browser I would use the LMS GUI with
> the "material" skin plugin.
>
To be clear, "LMS GUI" refers to the web page that is served by LMS when
a browser requests from the machine on which LMS is running, correct?
Paul We
The Material Skin is excellent, can be made to "look and feel" just like
a native Linux app easily enough. I use it on my ChromeBox and on my
iPhone most every day to control any/all of my squeezelite endpoints. I
don't really see a need for a native app, at all. YMMV.
piTouch™ w/JustBoom Di
The O2 Joggler is X86 running Linux.
The source code for Jivelite is available.
There is a lengthy thread about building Jivelite for Joggler.
This might be a good starting point
https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?110040-Jivelite-on-a-Joggler&p=932520&viewfull=1#post932520
As stated i
hi brainchild,
Like Ronnie, I am a bit slow as well.
As Squeeze/LMS is a very mature product it has hundreds (thousands?) of
options, with lots of confusing names. LMS has had 3 or 4 different
names.
For control on any computer with a browser I would use the LMS GUI with
the "material" skin p
brainchild wrote:
> Of course I can use it. I am just asking whether a native alternative is
> available, for Linux, as there has been for Windows and MacOS, that
> remains well maintained and easy to install.
>
>
>
> Yes. I was just being completely thorough, in light on various comments,
>
Man in a van wrote:
> I'm a bit slow sometimes, but why can you not use the LMS web interface
> ?
Of course I can use it. I am just asking whether a native alternative is
available, for Linux, as there has been for Windows and MacOS, that
remains well maintained and easy to install.
Man in a
brainchild wrote:
> I am running Linux Mint 21 on an x86 laptop.
>
I'm a bit slow sometimes, but why can you not use the LMS web interface
?
And I thought Linux Mint has been x64 only, since 20 :confused:
As I said, I'm sometimes a bit slow :o
ronnie
kidstypike wrote:
> Good luck finding that for which you seek, with an attitude like yours
> you'll need it.
I am only trying to understand what is currently available. I have
preferences and constraints just as everyone else. There is no need for
you to invoke a judgmental tone.
brainchild wrote:
> I am running Linux Mint 21 on an x86 laptop.
>
> What I have come to understand is that Jivelite is targeted for a player
> device such as a RPi running piCorePlayer, and that Squeeze Player is a
> desktop application that functions as a player for a media server, not a
> c
sodface wrote:
> There may be a package available for the distro he's running, but unless
> I missed it, he hasn't provided that info.
I am running Linux Mint 21 on an x86 laptop.
What I have come to understand is that Jivelite is targeted for a player
device such as a RPi running piCorePlaye
RobbH wrote:
> But there does not appear to be a jivelite build that's compatible with
> brainchild's (presumably X86) Linux computer.
There may be a package available for the distro he's running, but unless
I missed it, he hasn't provided that info.
-
just create a captive browser session that runs material only, its way
netter anyway unless you want VU, metres
PiCorePlayer 8.2 on Allo Digi One Signature (Lounge)
PiCorePlayer 8.2 with Hifiberry Digi+ Material running on PI for
control (Office)
PiCorePlayer 8.2 with pi official touchscreen
kidstypike wrote:
> A Raspberry pi is a Linux computer, it isn't necessarily a player only.
>
> Jivelite *is* a standalone Squeezebox controller. It does not run in a
> web browser.
But there does not appear to be a jivelite build that's compatible with
brainchild's (presumably X86) Linux comp
This is jivelite running on a Windows box.
38898
+---+
|Filename: jivelite.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=38898|
+
brainchild wrote:
> Yes, I found the download location on SourceForge.
>
> There is one file for download in the Linux folder. It is called
> `jivelite-0.1-20170220gitde9ea58-fbdev-armv6hf.tar.gz`, indicating that
> it is target for devices of Arm architecture, which excludes personal
> compute
Paul Webster wrote:
> Jivelite
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmsclients/files/jivelite/
Yes, I found the download location on SourceForge.
There is one file for download in the Linux folder. It is called
`jivelite-0.1-20170220gitde9ea58-fbdev-armv6hf.tar.gz`, indicating that
it is target
What linux distro are you running? Here's a screenshot of jivelite
running on Alpine in a tiling wm.
+---+
|Filename: 2022-10-16-131313_1920x1080_scrot.jpg|
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.ph
Jivelite
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmsclients/files/jivelite/
Paul Webster
author of \"now playing\" plugins covering radio france (fip etc),
planetradio (bauer - kiss, absolute, scala, jazzfm etc), kcrw, abc
australia and cbc/radio-canada
and, via the extra \"radio now playing\" plugin
Paul Webster wrote:
> Jivelite / Squeezeplay can be run on Linux desktops.
Would you please help me understand the overall scenario by naming an
application I would run on a Linux desktop?
brainchild's Profile: http://fo
Jivelite / Squeezeplay can be run on Linux desktops.
Paul Webster
author of \"now playing\" plugins covering radio france (fip etc),
planetradio (bauer - kiss, absolute, scala, jazzfm etc), kcrw, abc
australia and cbc/radio-canada
and, via the extra \"radio now playing\" plugin lots more - see
cpd73 wrote:
> I know you seem to be explicitly asking for a native app, but I use
> Material Skin as a web-app on my KDE/Plasma desktop.
I believe what you are describing is largely the same as I have done in
the past for some applications using the Webapp Manager, available in
Linux Mint. Ho
HB64 wrote:
> That's what jivelite does.
We are not understanding each other. I am looking for an application
that runs on a Linux desktop or laptop.
Jivelite runs on a player device.
How would it help with my request?
---
I know you seem to be explicitly asking for a native app, but I use
Material Skin as a web-app on my KDE/Plasma desktop. I've written a
(very) simple QWebEngine wrapper app that I use. (Previously used Chrome
but this keeps breaking). To use this integrated into Plasma's
taskbar/kickoff you just
brainchild wrote:
> Thanks for the response.
>
> It's not clear what this application does, but when I mentioned a Linux
> controller, I had in mind an application to run on a Linux desktop or
> laptop, to connect to the player or the media server, for the purposes
> of controlling what to play
sodface wrote:
> What about 'jivelite?' (https://github.com/ralph-irving/jivelite)
Thanks for the response.
It's not clear what this application does, but when I mentioned a Linux
controller, I had in mind an application to run on a Linux desktop or
laptop, to connect to the player or the medi
What about 'jivelite?' (https://github.com/ralph-irving/jivelite)
sodface's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=19057
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=116934
__
For controlling the piCorePlayer from a Linux desktop client, is any
software currently maintained, or is the web interface to the Media
Server the only feasible option?
I see some very old discussions on this topic, and I am seeking
up-to-date information.
70 matches
Mail list logo