Can one has the source code for the IDEA plugin or for initial Hugo's IDEA
plugin ?
Would be nice to have Tapestry 5 support for Eclipse too. And source code would
be a help.
Thanks
P.
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Palma [mailto:hugo.m.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009
+1 for Eclipse Galileo plugin!
Blšták Peter wrote:
Can one has the source code for the IDEA plugin or for initial Hugo's IDEA
plugin ?
Would be nice to have Tapestry 5 support for Eclipse too. And source code
would be a help.
Thanks
P.
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Palma
Hi,
In a app that I'm going to develop, it requires users to log in before they
can browse job related info, quite a number of those are pictures, those
photos now are stored in folders of the server, the easiest way is, link
that folder to tomcat's context, and program can refer to a
Hi Angelo,
you might investigate tapestry-spring-security [1]. It has everything
you need and there is a snapshot [2] that works with T5.1.
You can secure resources and if someone requests a secured resource
authentication is required from the framework. So, no hacking possible.
Michael
Do people think this is possible and worth doing, or a complete
non-starter? We occasionally want to use products/libraries that come
with taglibs as their primary way of integrating functionality into
pages. For example, it might be a CMS product with taglibs to render
content + formatting into
Standing from the point of view that i prefer jQuery to prototype, i would
like to see (Tapestry 5.2? ) a move into breaking down what the core web
functionalities, from those that depend on Javascript, particularly any
extensions, such as Prototype. But plain switching to jQuery is even worse.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:02 AM, icefra...@gmail.com wrote:
Standing from the point of view that i prefer jQuery to prototype, i would
like to see (Tapestry 5.2? ) a move into breaking down what the core web
functionalities, from those that depend on Javascript, particularly any
extensions,
This has been posted on the mailing list. Search for Mixin and Confirm.
Andy
Alfie Kirkpatrick schrieb:
Hi, would like to write a mixin (or even a subclass) that allows me to
throw up a confirm div/message box when the user clicks the link before
submitting the form. Basically an 'are you
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Alfie
Kirkpatrickalfie.kirkpatr...@ioko.com wrote:
Do people think this is possible and worth doing, or a complete
non-starter? We occasionally want to use products/libraries that come
with taglibs as their primary way of integrating functionality into
pages.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Angelo Chenangelochen...@yahoo.com.hk wrote:
folder, but it will slow down the rendering, any idea how to meet this
requirement with tapestry 5?
If you need or want a pure Tapestry solution, use a dispatcher. By the
way, a dispatcher is possible a solution for
Hi,
I use dispatcher in some cases like logging and automatic logging of user
with cookie, but
how to use dispatcher in this context? any tips? how we expose the protected
data?
Angelo
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Angelo
Hi,
I need to obtain the server name and port like example.com:8080 or
example.com:80, any idea ? Thanks
Angelo
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/t5%3A-obtaining-server-name-and-port-tp23961432p23961432.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at
This is not something related to tapestry, but:
HttpServletRequest.getServerName();
HttpServletRequest.getServerPort();
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Angelo Chen angelochen...@yahoo.com.hk
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009 15:41:51 GMT +02:00 Athens,
I agree with you. Most T5 users have projects that rely on Prototype
now, so plain switching to jQuery would break backward compatibility.
I agree as well. But I don't think there's a need to play the
backward-compatibility card here since removing the dependencies doesn't
need to break
Totally agreed with this, removing dependency is a good step, replacing
Prototype with jQuery will have the same issue when a better framework comes
in the future. I use jQuery with T5, it works quite well.
Onno Scheffers-3 wrote:
I agree with you. Most T5 users have projects that rely on
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Onno Schefferso...@piraya.nl wrote:
If Tapestry doesn't depend on any framework at all (just plain Javascript),
extensions based on Prototype will still work if the libraries are included
into the pages. It just means Tapestry can do without it.
IMHO, the
I'm sorry. links are now (5.1) obtained via PageRenderLinkSource's
createPageRenderLink(...)
Ulrich Stärk schrieb:
You can also return a Link instance (you can obtain one by injecting
ComponentResources and calling resources.createPageLink(...)) and set
the parameter with
I voted on the issue in JIRA, since i believe is an important part of
Tapestry that needs to be revisited.
It seems a bit awkward to have a project called tapestry-core that depends
in two third-party javascript libraries.
It's not just java developers who are affected by using Prototype,but
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply and I think your first answer should work, reason
for using query string is, it is from Google, it passes ?glid=test something
to the site.
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Angelo Chenangelochen...@yahoo.com.hk
wrote:
I think i remember a Tapestry component in the wiki (not sure if it
was T4 or T5) that would include a jsp
in the current (tapestry) page -
it basically did
context.getRequestDispatcher( jspPath ).include(request, response)
I'm not really sure if this still works + it would mean you'd use the
IMHO, the whole Prototype/jQuery compatibility problem is that both
define a $() function and they work differently, so you can't use code
based on both of them at the same time without modification. Some time
ago I used a jQuery color picker in a project. Even using the
jQuery.noConflict()
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Onno Schefferso...@piraya.nl wrote:
This simply means that particular plugin didn't adhere to the jQuery plugin
guidelines (http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Authoring). A plugin should never
use $() directly otherwise it will indeed break the jQuery.noConflict
Yes, what you've described, in general, would work.
Although you wouldn't necessarily need to contribute to
DefaultDataTypeAnalyzer.
If you're already adding the @DisplayForEdit-annotated properties in
the decorator, you could easily define the datatype for them
explicitly, as well.
See:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:32 AM, icefra...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems a bit awkward to have a project called tapestry-core that depends
in two third-party javascript libraries.
The problem is: how would Tapestry do that? Not using any framework?
This would mean the committers would need to
I didn't fully understand your exact requirement. Should the photo's be
publicly accessible (as in published by the user) or do you need to be
logged in to be able to access the photo?
If public access it isn't allowed, you should move the photo's to a
protected folder and you can create a
I've got a page where I want to disable a @Select component. However when
rewinding the form, it generates a StaleLink because the @For loop which
populates the select doesn't get rewound due to the @Select being disabled:
select jwcid=@Select disabled=ognl:selectDisabled multiple=true
Hi,
your understanding is correct, photos are under protected folders. and the
scaling will be a problem, but do you think it is good to store photo in the
database's blob field? and every rendering requires copying from database to
a temporary file?
Onno Scheffers-3 wrote:
I didn't fully
I have seen this sort of functionality used in DWR. The response is wrapped
in a class that writes to a local buffer instead of the response output
stream.
2009/6/10 Andreas Andreou andy...@di.uoa.gr
I think i remember a Tapestry component in the wiki (not sure if it
was T4 or T5) that would
The problem is: how would Tapestry do that? Not using any framework?
This would mean the committers would need to spend an awful lot of
time rewriting something that Javascript frameworks already do. Not
only this, but also to cope with the insonsistencies between browsers.
Defining an API
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Angelo Chenangelochen...@yahoo.com.hk wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
and every rendering requires copying from database to
a temporary file?
You don't need to that. Just create a page that returns the image
wrapped in a StreamResponse.
--
Thiago
As a start, anything that deals with Javascript should be moved away from the
core, since it's not essential. a tapestry-ui module would be great starting
point.
When i say forcing, i mean that Prototype is already built-in, rather than
letting me choose which Javascript framework do i want.
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:21:57 +0200, Onno Scheffers o...@piraya.nl wrote:
The problem is: how would Tapestry do that? Not using any framework?
This would mean the committers would need to spend an awful lot of
time rewriting something that Javascript frameworks already do. Not
only this, but
Has anyone successfully created a project using Tapestry and Spring for
jax-ws web services?
I have a project using these technologies and I'm getting a number of
issues. The first is this error:-
org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.TapestryException: Exception
constructing service
Hi, there is a interest survey results of JavaScript Frameworks
http://www.kylehayes.info/2009/03/29/survey-results-javascript-frameworks/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Switch-from-Prototype-to-jQuery--tp21750338p23965054.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing
Hi,
your understanding is correct, photos are under protected folders. and the
scaling will be a problem, but do you think it is good to store photo in
the
database's blob field? and every rendering requires copying from database
to
a temporary file?
You can spool the data from a BLOB
I don't quite agree with that statement. I started playing around
with T5.1 (mostly having skipped T5.0) and added this line to my
Layout.java component:
@IncludeJavaScriptLibrary
( { context:js/jquery-1.3.2.min.js,
context:js/jquery-ui-1.7.1.custom.min.js } )
The resulting HTML
Maybe it doesn't have to be plain js since there's a lot to be gained from
these libraries. Perhaps all Tapestry's .js files could be moved to a
tapestry-prototype module, each of those files could then be reimplemented
in a tapestry-jquery module.
A problem remains with script snippets
excellent resource iberck!
i also like this one mentioned in the blog post:
http://selectors.turnwheel.com/slickspeed.php
jQuery was a clear winner against Prototype in my Ubuntu/Firefox 3 box (287
vs 386)
iberck wrote:
Hi, there is a interest survey results of JavaScript Frameworks
this is a good idea. which one is faster:
returning the image as a stream or a direct link to a physical file in the
file system?
Onno Scheffers-3 wrote:
Hi,
your understanding is correct, photos are under protected folders. and
the
scaling will be a problem, but do you think it is good
this is a good idea. which one is faster:
returning the image as a stream or a direct link to a physical file in the
file system?
The physical file is much faster.
It just gets a little troublesome to keep all files in sync if your
application has to be distributed over multiple servers: a
try setting volatile to true in the @For component
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:10 PM, bryanspant...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got a page where I want to disable a @Select component. However when
rewinding the form, it generates a StaleLink because the @For loop which
populates the select doesn't
Hi,
Is this the most concise and clear way to create a PageLink to the
current page? Or are there other solutions that don't look so hacky? (
Note that literal: part)
SomePage.tml:
...
a t:id=linkId t:page=literal: t:context=context=someContext
class=actionLink text/a
...
SomePage.java:
...
I believe it's mentioned in the comments of the previously-referenced
jira, but, the main reason this issue is trickier than it seems is
that there are many applications in existence already that are relying
on:
1) The fact that tapestry bundles prototype
2) The fact that tapestry
switching js approaches in the middle of the game is definitely an idea
that needs to be approached with copious amounts of caution and
consideration.
I think we all agree on that.
And we also all want Tapestry to be the best it can be. Sadly that means
something different to everyone :o)
Sorry, the first tml is better written as :
SomePage.tml:
...
a t:id=linkIdLink text/a
...
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Sergey Didenkosergey.dide...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is this the most concise and clear way to create a PageLink to the
current page? Or are there other solutions that
Even more of a reason to encapsulate as much as possible all this patches.
Otherwise, as time passes, the API would end up polluted with javascript
patches to support required behaviour.
In my view, javascript/css is a very dangerous arena, and deep integration
can lead you to lock-ins such as
Em Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:39:56 -0300, ice fra...@gmail.com escreveu:
Even more of a reason to encapsulate as much as possible all this
patches. Otherwise, as time passes, the API would end up polluted with
javascript
patches to support required behaviour.
Does anyone volunteer to write this
My point is that Tapestry-core should be about generation of state management
of pages, and generation of markup. javascript niceties are a plus, but not
core.
Moving away UI related code into another module should make it easier to
encapsulate the problem, and deal with it in a succession of
Em Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:31:55 -0300, ice fra...@gmail.com escreveu:
My point is that Tapestry-core should be about generation of state
management of pages, and generation of markup. javascript niceties are a
plus, but not core.
Moving away UI related code into another module should make it
Does anyone volunteer to write this Javascript encapsulation layer? I think
it's a nice idea, but I don't have the time nor the Javascript knowledge
needed.
I wouldn't mind helping out. I'm not an expert either, so I don't think I
can do it all alone. But I think this is important enough for
This worked. Thank you.
Andreas Andreou-4 wrote:
try setting volatile to true in the @For component
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Stale-Link-Exception-on-Disabled-Select-Component-tp23964397p23970088.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
Tapestry-core almost donsn't have UI-related code, and all it's all in the
components and CSS files (that are overridable and can be configured to
not be used).
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
Tapestry-core has two parts: the
...
@Inject
private RequestGlobals requestGlobals;
... requestGlobals.getHTTPServletRequest().getServerName();
... requestGlobals.getHTTPServletRequest().getServerPort();
...
Em Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:45:53 -0300, Onno Scheffers o...@piraya.nl
escreveu:
I wouldn't mind helping out. I'm not an expert either, so I don't think I
can do it all alone. But I think this is important enough for the future
of Tapestry to donate some of my time.
Nice! I think we need to
Em Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:16:03 -0300, ice fra...@gmail.com escreveu:
well, that's kind of my idea really. to seperate them into two parts.
That way, changes to the UI layer don't break the core.
Changes to the UI layer, as Tapestry is now, won't break the core, so
there'se no need do
just like in spring, you'll have a separation between the view technologies
and the spring MVC, the classes that represent the web framework should be
in core, and the ui related classes in its own module.
while it can be argued that ui components can change quite a lot, and would
potentially
1) Defining an framework-independent API to be used by Tapestry (events,
DOM manipulation, selectors, etc). Maybe there's something similar out
there, not necessarily Tapestry-related.
Sizzle selector (http://sizzlejs.com/) might be a nice contender, but I
haven't looked into it indepth yet.
t:pagelink page=prop:componentResources.pageName ... /t:pagelink
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Sergey
Didenkosergey.dide...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, the first tml is better written as :
SomePage.tml:
...
a t:id=linkIdLink text/a
...
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Sergey
The literal: part only works for the root Index page of your application.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
t:pagelink page=prop:componentResources.pageName ... /t:pagelink
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Sergey
Didenkosergey.dide...@gmail.com
so, i have a page that has many components with zones and blocks. the
page loads fine, but, when i try and submit on a form that uses a zone i
get javascript errors while rendering the block. these are probably my
own javascript problems, but, the ie script debugger is not finding the
right
I use tapestry 4.1.5
I have problem to add javascript that execute after form submit and
all field valid (through validation) before form really send request
to server.
anyone have same problem? or already have solution?
thanks
61 matches
Mail list logo
