Axil Axil wrote:
> If all works like it is designed to, the congressional hearing would be
> held behind closed doors and the information would be kept secret.
>
Correct. But this would never be kept secret. It would be leaked to Fox
News immediately, because it would hurt the administration. No
I briefly looked into the US residency status of Rossi.
Some say he is a US citizen and others say he is a permanent resident. Both
these conditions put him under secrecy restrictions. Getting the truth
about Rossi is difficult; does anybody know for sure?
A politician can routinely reveal s
*A "member" meaning a member of Congress?!?”*
Yes
*“Do you think the Pentagon can ignore an inquiry from Congress, or tell
Congress it will not answer? That is not how it works. The Pentagon must
respond. It would respond. It would give the information to a
Representative who has security clearan
No. Not me. But I did spend most of my life in the semiconductor business,
too.
> Pagnucco
> "Lou Pagnucco, Kulite Semiconductor Products Inc, Leonia, NJ" Â
> Not you?
>
> Sorry.
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
So does that make Rossi a civilian miltary contractor and should he now be
subject to a 10 year sentence for his internet blabberfest? I would not
want him connected in any way, shape or form with my top secret military
project.
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012, Axil Axil wrote:
> As a military proj
Axil Axil wrote:
Jed, you are betting on the wrong horse if you think the Congress is going
> to keep Rossi’s LENR system in the mainstream and out of classification.
>
You are very confused, again.
1. The Congress cannot decide what to classify and what to make public.
That decision is entirel
As a military project manager, I would NEVER use the name LENR. In an
attempt at redirection, I would rename the reference to advanced “hydrogen
ion nano-battery” or the like.
Next, the military and civilian workers associated with the project all
have clearances and are all under the threat of a
Axil Axil wrote:
> Furthermore, Solandra was not a black project. If an inquiry on LENR by a
> member was to occur, that inquiry would itself be classified an no one
> would ever know about such an inquiry.
>
A "member" meaning a member of Congress?!? Do you think the Pentagon can
ignore an inq
Axil Axil wrote:
I am amused at your naïve trust in the competency of the US Congress.
>
Please do not put words in my mouth, and do not use strawman arguments. I
am not suggesting that the Congress is especially competent. However, I am
familiar with the laws under which it operates. I know st
I don't think the military would want a blabbering Rossi spewing
spinformation daily across the Internet as he is doing. Also, what kind of
real security is around that warehouse in italy? Anybody with a box of
donuts could probably make it past the security guard i saw in an early
video. And th
On 2012-04-18 20:35, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[...]
in /10th International Workshop on Anomalies in Hydrogen Loaded Metals/.
2012.
Most slides from the 10th International Workshop on Anomalies in
Hydrogen Loaded Metals have been made available here:
http://www.iscmns.org/work10/program.htm
By th
I am amused at your naïve trust in the competency of the US Congress. The
only thing the members are interested in is being reelected and getting
pork for their district.
Furthermore, Solandra was not a black project. If an inquiry on LENR by a
member was to occur, that inquiry would itself be c
Good idea. I think Taliban outhouses would be a good first testing ground
for Rossi's Device.
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012, Axil Axil wrote:
> Your political predilections have forced a disconnect in the logic of your
> position.
>
> If Rossi has sold his system to a military customer, the requi
Axil Axil wrote:
FYI
> http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/02/pentagons-black-budget/
>
>
> See for Yourself: The Pentagon’s $51 Billion ‘Black’ Budget
>
You fail to understand that every item in that budget, and every dollar in
it, is subject to Congressional oversight and review. Some Senator
Axil Axil wrote:
The details of the development of intelligence gathering platforms are
> always protected from public and congressional oversight by the black
> budget process were only a total budgetary figure is available.
>
No, they are not. Programs are protected only because there are so m
FYI
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/02/pentagons-black-budget/
See for Yourself: The Pentagon’s $51 Billion ‘Black’ Budget
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> “Actually, any involvement in cold fusion at any level would be a scandal.
> But especially, buying something for
“Actually, any involvement in cold fusion at any level would be a scandal.
But especially, buying something for a million bucks and leaving it at the
factory untested is simple out of the question.”
The details of the development of intelligence gathering platforms are
always protected from publ
Your political predilections have forced a disconnect in the logic of your
position.
If Rossi has sold his system to a military customer, the requirements of
the current military grand strategy of automating war fighting will force a
Tom Clancy like development of Robot warriors.
Do you think t
So your positions is that Rossi is lying about his customer, he is
irrational, he has no product, his system does not work, he is a fraud. You
can’t have it both ways. So sorry, you are faced with a no win situation.
He has either sold his system to a military customer or he is a liar and a
fraud.
"Rossi says that President Obama is the greatest president of all times"
Now I am convinced Rossi is full of s&)t!
The rest of your analysis reads like a Tom Clancy novel and unfortunately i
think Rossi's actions are better captured in the novel Matchstick Men.
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012, Jed
Pagnucco
"Lou Pagnucco, Kulite Semiconductor Products Inc, Leonia, NJ"
Not you?
Sorry.
I meant they do NOT spend millions "just to know."
The whole idea is preposterous. If anyone in the press found out about such
a thing, they would be dragged before Congress and everyone involved would
be fired.
Actually, any involvement in cold fusion at any level would be a scandal.
But especia
Axil Axil wrote:
Taking delivery of the prototype is not necessary. What is necessary is to
> see the prototype work in self sustain mode…Yes it is real. Just to know
> that Rossi’s LENR technology is viable is all that the Navy requires.
>
I know several people in the Navy and Army. What you ar
Taking delivery of the prototype is not necessary. What is necessary is to
see the prototype work in self sustain mode…Yes it is real. Just to know
that Rossi’s LENR technology is viable is all that the Navy requires. This
is important to justify the Navy’s current E-Cat development effort. And
th
I wrote:
> He hasn't downsized it as far as I know.
>
I mean the ratio of weight to power has not improved, which is what you
need to improve for aviation apps.
- Jed
Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi must have made the sale to the US Navy because he has stopped looking
> for a major supportive money rich customer.
>
As far as I know he is still looking for money. I doubt anyone paid him a
million bucks for that reactor. I doubt anyone bought it at all. Who would
buy eq
David Roberson wrote:
Has anyone identified a change in one of the fuel ingredients? I am
> curious as to where the energy is derived.
>
Hmmm . . . It does not say. I assume it is a conventional turbine, driven
by kerosene. Aeroderivative turbine generators are the most efficient in
the electri
Rossi must have made the sale to the US Navy because he has stopped looking
for a major supportive money rich customer. And he has stopped complaining
about a lack of money.
Rossi has devoted much effort in downsizing his reactor core. I believe
this effort was directed towards the requirements
"Not-quite-so elementary, my dear electron"
http://www.nature.com/news/not-quite-so-elementary-my-dear-electron-1.10471
It looks like an electron can be decomposed into a "holon," "spinon" and
"orbiton" in some contexts by using X-rays. The holon carries the
electron's (negative) charge. I wond
Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi has stated that his 1 MW reactors was delivered to a military
> customer.
>
As far as I know, the 1 MW reactor has not been delivered to anyone. It is
still sitting there.
I doubt it was purchased by the U.S. military. Maybe European military.
Actually, I doubt it was pu
Rossi has stated that his 1 MW reactors was delivered to a military
customer. It logically follows that he would setup his company in close
proximity to that customer.
Florida’s Mayport Naval Station and Jacksonville Naval Air Station was also
where the Navy’s Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (
Axil Axil wrote:
> I suspect the requirement for the 45 MW LENR systems originally came from
> the US Navy to power their aircraft carrier based drones.
>
Also, if Rossi can make a 45 MW reactor it will be the size of an office
building. It will weigh many times more than a drone. Even Rossi's sm
Axil Axil wrote:
> I suspect the requirement for the 45 MW LENR systems originally came from
> the US Navy to power their aircraft carrier based drones.
>
You don't need 45 MW for a drone! Okay, maybe for the upcoming X-47B drone,
but you would not start with that. They would start with a small d
See:
Cantwell, R., D. McConnell, and T.N. Claytor, *Search for excess heat in
metal cathodes exposed to pulsed hydrogen plasma (PowerPoint slides)*, in *10th
International Workshop on Anomalies in Hydrogen Loaded Metals*. 2012.
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1097
http://lenr-canr.org/ac
I suspect the requirement for the 45 MW LENR systems originally came from
the US Navy to power their aircraft carrier based drones. Military aircraft
always precede commercial aircraft development.
As background, the U.S. Navy's pursuit of drones is recognition of the need
for new weapons and str
Team,
Sorry to disappoint, but I own no shop.
However, if the tech you refer to is real, it should be easy to set up a
persuasive public demo.
LP
Teampositive wrote:
> Pagnucco,
>
> If the boys in the back of your NJ shop are successfully finished their
> free Lattice Energy through arc plasmas
Has anyone identified a change in one of the fuel ingredients? I am curious as
to where the energy is derived.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: integral.property.service
To: vortex-L
Sent: Wed, Apr 18, 2012 1:06 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Boeing Electric Airliner---LENR Application=???
Ron,
Ev
I was just reviewing the chart from Professor Miley that shows the increased
temperature that resulted from the loading and then unloading of D2 gas from
palladium and had a couple of questions that I hoped someone would clarify.
It is my understanding that if we start with D2 molecular gas that
That's great! That would be easy to adapt to cold fusion, in a
first-generation cold fusion aircraft. You would not need the battery, so
the payload would be increased.
This airplane reduces fuel consumption by 70% -- an astounding number. That
is not necessary with cold fusion. It would serve no
Ron,
Even better:
http://pesn.com/2012/04/15/9602075_Inteligentry_Manufacturers_Gearing_Up_for_Noble_Gas_Engine_Roll-out/
Reliable
Ron Kita wrote:
Greetings Vortex-L
An ideal LENR App the Boeing Sugar Volt:
http://cubeme.com/blog/2010/08/03/boeing-team%E2%80%99s-innovative-sugar-volt-
Greetings Vortex-L
An ideal LENR App the Boeing Sugar Volt:
http://cubeme.com/blog/2010/08/03/boeing-team%E2%80%99s-innovative-sugar-volt-concept/
Ronn Kita, Chiralex
Pagnucco,
If the boys in the back of your NJ shop are successfully finished their free
Lattice Energy through arc plasmas in hydrogen here is a next project: Gearing
Up to replicate this startling free energy devise at
http://pesn.com/2012/04/15/9602075_Inteligentry_Manufacturers_Gearing_Up_for
I don't notice the exact post ? is it Brad Arnold?
I also notice the story of Kim and 511keV, which his a hint that his theory
might be the good one... good news if true.
2012/4/18
>
> Alain,
>
> Everybody is seeing free cold fusion energy. See the Physicist comment at:
> http://www.chrismart
Alain,
Everybody is seeing free cold fusion energy. See the Physicist comment at:
http://www.chrismartenson.com/forum/cold-fusion/51623?page=7#comments
teampositive
http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=15470 You may view the latest post at
http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=15644
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 06:30:48AM +0300, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
>
> Actually, Fiscaletti and Sorli did not invent anything new, but they just
> reinvented Lorentz's theory of relativity from the early 1900's. It is
> exactly the same theory that I was here using to explain the supposed
> neutri
45 matches
Mail list logo
