Re: [Vo]:Indian Summer

The term "Indian Summer" may come from the American Indians apparent indifference to cold weather. In historical novels, one can find reference to this, where the Indians would wonder why the white men would bundle up, just because there was snow on the ground. In graduate school, I had a girlfrie

Re: [Vo]:Exploding Pagers

In reply to MSF's message of Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:50:52 +: Hi, [snip] >No doubt we have all read about the exploding pagers in Lebanon and elsewhere. >In addition, other devices, such as walkie talkies and even cell phones have >been exploding. What has happened? You are expected to believe t

Re: [Vo]:Indian Summer

In reply to MSF's message of Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:21:46 +: Hi, [snip] >Hello, Robin > >Unless I'm misinterpreting, you are saying that your "Indian Summer" happens >in the Australian spring in order to be simultaneous with the American >equivalent in the autumn. Correct. At the end of Winter

Re: [Vo]:Indian Summer

On Thursday, September 19th, 2024 at 12:09 PM, Robin wrote: > Hi, > > In the US, you sometimes get an "Indian Summer" around this time of year. So > do we in Australia. > That's strange because the seasons here are reversed. > IOW it happens to the whole planet at the same time of year. Wha

Re: [Vo]:No Vandegraaf Needed

"Internal Server Error" i feel lighter, already. --- | Esa Ruoho | +358403703659 | | http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho | | http://lackluster.bandcamp.com | http://lackluster.org | http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial | > On 26. Jul 2024, at 20.46, MSF wrote: > > https://ba19cce69bf1d62b865e2ff0

Re: [Vo]:Repeatable COP of ~1.5 seems to be reported by many

Could it be as Sabine says? https://youtu.be/TEzsBhJTgpc?t=219 Hydrogenation? I haven't looked at this device so if that's a silly idea nevermind. On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 at 08:32, Jones Beene wrote: > The interesting point is that despite lack of market value for the tech, > it seems to actual

Re: [Vo]:Repeatable COP of ~1.5 seems to be reported by many

Rossi will demo an onboard 3 KW overunity EV battery charging system in October. Here is Rossi's LENR theory www. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions IMO, what Rossi calls electron clusters are actually an Exciton-polariton condensate.

Re: [Vo]:Repeatable COP of ~1.5 seems to be reported by many

The (astro)physicist Sabine Hossenfelder discusses the claim on her channel. She has 1.4 million subscribers. https://youtu.be/TEzsBhJTgpc harry On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 3:42 PM Jed Rothwell wrote: > Andrew Meulenberg wrote: > > At low external temperatures, many heat pump systems switch over t

Re: [Vo]:Repeatable COP of ~1.5 seems to be reported by many

Andrew Meulenberg wrote: At low external temperatures, many heat pump systems switch over to ohmic > heating. > I had one that did that at ~40 deg F, here in Atlanta. Which is not very cold. I think more modern ones go lower. An online source says they go down to 25 deg F. Mine did not have an

Re: [Vo]:Repeatable COP of ~1.5 seems to be reported by many

At low external temperatures, many heat pump systems switch over to ohmic heating. Do they turn off the heat pump or do they heat the input to the pump? Either way, using a CF source (w COP of 1.5) *and* its output could be useful, if it were both cheap and reliable enough. On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 a

Re: [Vo]:Repeatable COP of ~1.5 seems to be reported by many

Jones Beene wrote: > To my knowledge, the cavitation tech and real gain of Griggs has never > been debunked > Indeed, Huang offers strong support for Griggs, with a much larger reaction, a larger output to input ratio, and far better reliability. https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/HuangBJwatercantr

Re: [Vo]:Repeatable COP of ~1.5 seems to be reported by many

Of course. A robust fully demonstrable 1.5 - 2.5 COP gain would be a Holy Grail moment to demonstrate that new physics is involved - I'm not decrying it, just the commercial potential... On Fri, 19 Jul 2024, 21:23 Jones Beene, wrote: > The interesting point is that despite lack of market value

Re: [Vo]:Repeatable COP of ~1.5 seems to be reported by many

The interesting point is that despite lack of market value for the tech, it seems to actually violate long standing physical laws plus there seems to be an intrinsic window where the actual gain is around 50 percent over input The heat pump, in contrast,  merely taps environmental heat and ther

Re: [Vo]:Repeatable COP of ~1.5 seems to be reported by many

Nicholas Palmer wrote: > If it can only manage a COP of 1.5-2.5, it's not as effective as a heat > pump... > Yes. 1.5 has no practical use. Still, 50 W excess is good because it can be measured with confidence. I think they said the results are "consistent." If they can make it happen every time

Re: [Vo]:Repeatable COP of ~1.5 seems to be reported by many

If it can only manage a COP of 1.5-2.5, it's not as effective as a heat pump... On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, 17:07 Jones Beene, wrote: > HYLENR Demonstrates World's First Cold Fusion Technology to Generate Clean > Energy >

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

Ruby sent these to me after i kept forwarding your messages to her. Voice Only: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F1m5T1gZZIuU-6sOrmTpIFNlyPyh8-q_/view?usp=drive_link Voice + Soundtrack: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cZaDvptIHZvrO73KG82dnWrGDv2i4Fvk/view?usp=drive_link --- | Esa Ruoho | +3

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

H L V wrote: > On the surface of Venus you would not need an external source of heat. ;-) > Great! Let's go there. Better yet, let's send Elon Musk.

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 2:50 PM Jed Rothwell wrote: > Robin wrote: > > >> I fell asleep about half way through. The "lead" was buried so deep (if >> it even exists) that I just gave up. >> They talk about producing 10-20 watts of excess heat, but what percentage >> is that of the total? Do they

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 1:51 PM Jed Rothwell wrote: > Esa Ruoho wrote: > > Hi Robin. Ruby used my tunes and added them into the video herself while >> editing it, going to great pains to get the levels and balance between song >> and voice right. >> > > You should not have the song and voice at

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

In reply to Esa Ruoho's message of Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:53:05 +0300: Hi Esa, [snip] >Hi Robin. Ruby used my tunes and added them into the video herself while >editing it, going to great pains to get the levels and balance between song >and voice right. This doesn't answer my original question.

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

Esa Ruoho wrote: Hi Robin. Ruby used my tunes and added them into the video herself while > editing it, going to great pains to get the levels and balance between song > and voice right. > You should not have the song and voice at the same time. That makes it hard to hear what the people are say

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

Hi Robin. Ruby used my tunes and added them into the video herself while editing it, going to great pains to get the levels and balance between song and voice right. — http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com // +358403703659 // http://www

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:59:56 -0400: Hi Esa, I'm guessing that you were responsible for adding the music, so could you provide a URL to the original? [snip] >Robin wrote: > >Since the music was presumably dubbed in later, I wonder if she has the >> original r

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

Robin wrote: Since the music was presumably dubbed in later, I wonder if she has the > original recording without music, and could > perhaps make it available? > Surely she has the original recording! Who would throw that away in the era of terabyte disks? Ask her if she can provide it.

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:01:56 -0400: Hi, [snip] >She says she is counting the number of people who are annoyed by music. So >let's all tell her to tone it down! I told her she should fade it out after >a minute or so. Since the music was presumably dubbed in late

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

She says she is counting the number of people who are annoyed by music. So let's all tell her to tone it down! I told her she should fade it out after a minute or so. On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 8:35 PM Robin wrote: > In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:47:22 -0400: > Hi Jed,

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

In reply to Esa “LacklusterOfficial” Ruoho's message of Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:10:09 +0300: Hi, Thanks, I'll do that, though that doesn't change the fact that technical videos should never have background music at all. I have seen several of them where little care was given to the placement of th

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:47:22 -0400: Hi Jed, Feel free, though I was under the impression that she followed this list. >Robin wrote: > >Hi, >> >> Such a pity that the music drowns out the words. >> > >I agree. You should tell Ruby. I can forward your message to

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 20 Jun 2024 14:42:23 -0400: Hi Jed, Thanks for providing a clear and concise summary. If Hydrogen is used as the fuel, then it has to be produced, so how much energy is produced / atom of Hydrogen consumed? (I consider this to be the true measure of uti

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

Robin wrote: > I fell asleep about half way through. The "lead" was buried so deep (if it > even exists) that I just gave up. > They talk about producing 10-20 watts of excess heat, but what percentage > is that of the total? Do they mention it > anywhere? This is gas loading, so there is no i

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

In reply to Esa “LacklusterOfficial” Ruoho's message of Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:10:09 +0300: Hi, I fell asleep about half way through. The "lead" was buried so deep (if it even exists) that I just gave up. They talk about producing 10-20 watts of excess heat, but what percentage is that of the tot

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

Robin wrote: Hi, > > Such a pity that the music drowns out the words. > I agree. You should tell Ruby. I can forward your message to her if you like.

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

Hi Robin. The YouTube video has CC closed captions / subtitles. please enable them. --- | Esa Ruoho | +358403703659 | | http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho | | http://lackluster.bandcamp.com | http://lackluster.org | http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial | > On 18. Jun 2024, at 23.55, Robin wrote

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: Ruby at VEGATEC - Nano-nickel LENR.

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:39:24 -0400: Hi, Such a pity that the music drowns out the words. [snip] >From Alan Smith: > >Excellent film featuring contributions from Jean-Paul Biberian, Jacques >Ruer, Robert Michel, Mathieu Valat and Christophe Le Roux from Vegatec

Re: [Vo]:pressure in a gas increases linearly with thermal energy/temp, but every time pressure doubles it pushes a piston twice as hard and far which results in 4 times the mechanical energy produced

The ideal gas law says that pV/T = constant!! So T absolute follows pressure (p). Just make the proper calculations! J.W. On 17.06.2024 23:49, Jonathan Berry wrote: I'm not sure what p=1 means, the initial pressure whatever it might be?? And then you say PSI is 1/3 not 5, well 1/3 of a PSI?? 

Re: [Vo]:pressure in a gas increases linearly with thermal energy/temp, but every time pressure doubles it pushes a piston twice as hard and far which results in 4 times the mechanical energy produced

I'm not sure what p=1 means, the initial pressure whatever it might be?? And then you say PSI is 1/3 not 5, well 1/3 of a PSI?? But what you say contradicts the ideal gas law which applies to gas in the pressure and temp range I am considering. On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 21:15, Jürg Wyttenbach wr

Re: [Vo]:pressure in a gas increases linearly with thermal energy/temp, but every time pressure doubles it pushes a piston twice as hard and far which results in 4 times the mechanical energy produced

As said, if you start at p=1 and increase T by 100C then psi is 1/3 not 5. For 200C its 2/3 etc... J.W. On 17.06.2024 11:01, Jonathan Berry wrote: Yes but I am assuming the gas is hot enough to behave according to the ideal gas law. And it follows that to a presst decent temp close enough as

Re: [Vo]:pressure in a gas increases linearly with thermal energy/temp, but every time pressure doubles it pushes a piston twice as hard and far which results in 4 times the mechanical energy produced

Yes but I am assuming the gas is hot enough to behave according to the ideal gas law. And it follows that to a presst decent temp close enough as I understand. For my purposes it only has to be close enough. Now to be clear what I am talking about has NOTHiNG to do with the TOTAL pressure, rathe

Re: [Vo]:pressure in a gas increases linearly with thermal energy/temp, but every time pressure doubles it pushes a piston twice as hard and far which results in 4 times the mechanical energy produced

Jonahan Classically pV/T = constant.. So to keep it simple  if you increase T by 100 (starting at 273K) then the pressure does only increase about 1/3. 373/273 about 4/3. Further gas internal energy is defined by the Gibbs equation that includes the entropy. Pressure is not a linear functio

Re: [Vo]:pressure in a gas increases linearly with thermal energy/temp, but every time pressure doubles it pushes a piston twice as hard and far which results in 4 times the mechanical energy produced

Jürg, the problem with that is if that is so then the thermal capacity of the gas would need to increase as temp increases but with say Helium it's pretty flat. Every time I look into the math for increasing temp it is the same, if you heat it up twice as much it needs twice as much energy not 4 t

Re: [Vo]:pressure in a gas increases linearly with thermal energy/temp, but every time pressure doubles it pushes a piston twice as hard and far which results in 4 times the mechanical energy produced

The energy of a gas is the sum over all kinetic energies. So you need 4x energy input to get 2x average speed = pressure. (comes from momentum exchange!) J.W. On 16.06.2024 10:27, Jonathan Berry wrote: Hooke's law states that if you compress a spring the increase in pressure is linear, if

Re: [Vo]:Peer Review

*"With a Carnot cycle/heatpump combination you cannot reach > 100%"* If we just assume that the second law is correct, then you are correct, that it cannot. But if I ask you why not when there is a thermal potential 2, 3 or 30 times larger (OR MORE, technically a case for a COP+EER of 60 can be m

Re: [Vo]:Peer Review

Jonathan, With a Carnot cycle/heatpump combination you cannot reach > 100%. But.. OF course the second law only holds for such simple processes. We have nano particles that can double the frequencies of photon standing waves due to mode suppression. The main problem is that historically phy

Re: [Vo]:Peer Review

Hi Jonathan, This is my first message to this mailing list. I used only observe the conversation but your message convinced to reply. First, I'd note I didn't read fully your message but only skimmed it and I saw your remark point on the link which was supposed to "prove your point" on 2nd law

Re: [Vo]:Too late

Robin wrote: > I think small autonomous weapons are > >more of a threat than AI. See: > > > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA > > This technology uses AI. > Barely. Minimal AI. I think there was enough AI years ago to accomplish the things shown here, such as stochastic movement, fac

Re: [Vo]:Too late

Already the first US cruise missile did use AI more than 50 years ago. So what is new in the actual AI/KI that you want to discuss?? We at ETH did run the first autonomous car in 1988 was this AI or KI or what? We call this domain pattern recognition & analysis as it is also used in American s

Re: [Vo]:Too late

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:11:58 -0400: Hi, [snip] >For some reason I feel sanguine about AI. Maybe because I have seen in some >detail how poorly it works, and how limited it is. Don't get me wrong: it >is very useful. It is a huge breakthrough. But it is far from b

Re: [Vo]:Too late

For some reason I feel sanguine about AI. Maybe because I have seen in some detail how poorly it works, and how limited it is. Don't get me wrong: it is very useful. It is a huge breakthrough. But it is far from being anything like sentient intelligence. I think small autonomous weapons are more of

Re: [Vo]:Too late

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 7 Jun 2024 16:08:57 -0400: Hi Jed, I have no problem with that as far as it goes, however I fear that if will be expanded. E.g. it would prove lucrative for script writing AIs to be able to emulate the emotions of the characters. Ergo sooner or later w

Re: [Vo]:Too late

Robin wrote: My problem is with the whole line of research. This is just "a foot in the > door" so to speak. What door? What is the problem with this research? Why would there be any harm if a computer program senses the emotions or attitude of the person using the program? I should think that

Re: [Vo]:Too late

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:35:18 -0400: Hi, My problem is with the whole line of research. This is just "a foot in the door" so to speak. >Whoa. Quote: > >In this study, our focus is on examining and modeling three emotions: >happiness, boredom, and irritation. >

Re: [Vo]:Too late

Whoa. Quote: In this study, our focus is on examining and modeling three emotions: happiness, boredom, and irritation. Okay, I see why they want to do this. They want the software to sense the user's emotional state so it can adjust to it. As long as they don't have the computer itself display ar

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR ChatBot is back online

Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > Most KI, chatbots do not work with multiple input/questions. > Yes. Good point. I tried a variety of questions. The one I posted here had multiple inputs, but I tried simple ones as well.

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR ChatBot is back online

Most KI, chatbots do not work with multiple input/questions. The technology still is stone age and only driven by the finance markets. KI as of today will make our live much worse when not even a hell. Try once the new FEDEX customer interface. Then you will note that you no longer are a cust

Re: [Vo]:Roger Green - Interview of one of the first investors in Andrea Rossi

Like Schrodinger's cat the Ecat is both dead and alive. Harry On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 5:44 PM MSF wrote: > Is anyone surprised? > > On Thursday, May 16th, 2024 at 2:44 PM, Joe Hughes > wrote: > > > I found this interesting and thought I would share: > > https://youtu.be/Xh-fHzNQrO0?si=lqZwy5yP

Re: [Vo]:Roger Green - Interview of one of the first investors in Andrea Rossi

Is anyone surprised? On Thursday, May 16th, 2024 at 2:44 PM, Joe Hughes wrote: > I found this interesting and thought I would share: > https://youtu.be/Xh-fHzNQrO0?si=lqZwy5yP9AcRvswf > > Best Regards, > Joe

Re: [Vo]:If 2 heat engines are placed in series their efficiency is lower, and the second law breaks according to Carnot if that can occur!

OK If you change the limits like some do with the Peltier elements using 500C input then you can get higher COP's due to the higher entry level. (and just ignore the heating of the input...) Heat pumps we use in houses are certified - Europe for 0..35C, not for 10..35C - as we live pretty nort

Re: [Vo]:If 2 heat engines are placed in series their efficiency is lower, and the second law breaks according to Carnot if that can occur!

*Sorry a heatpump (HP) cannot have a COP 30 or 60* Sorry but they can, I gave you the links. The math also supports this. No, you are right that a regular small house-hold heatpumps operating at 100% power over the rated temperature differential will top out currently at about a heating COP of 5

Re: [Vo]:If 2 heat engines are placed in series their efficiency is lower, and the second law breaks according to Carnot if that can occur!

Sorry a heatpump (HP) cannot have a COP 30 or 60. Assume a COP of 5 for a single step HP as we have it today in a reasonably good probe heat pump. (mine has 5.5 for heating) You can neither simply multiply or add the COP's as you must provide e.g. 20x the basic energy to fill the reservoir for

Re: [Vo]:If 2 heat engines are placed in series their efficiency is lower, and the second law breaks according to Carnot if that can occur!

Oh I missed the end: "Heatpumps are reverse Carnot engines and have a much higher COP in respect to heat gained but *not to current gained!!!"* Current? I'm not sure what you mean by this, you might be talking about the volume of thermal energy moved, or you might be talking about the electric

Re: [Vo]:If 2 heat engines are placed in series their efficiency is lower, and the second law breaks according to Carnot if that can occur!

Not sure why but this isn't forming into proper paragraphs... *"Youtube physics usually is self satisfaction of people that have no clue of the simplest things. So I almost never watch this garbage."* The video is covering the work of a company cascading heat pumps. As such the temperature differ

Re: [Vo]:If 2 heat engines are placed in series their efficiency is lower, and the second law breaks according to Carnot if that can occur!

Youtube physics usually is self satisfaction of people that have no clue of the simplest things. So I almost never watch this garbage. A heatpump is not a Carnot process as *you obviously supply additional energy*! You must calculate in the Carnot conversion rate of energy gained --> electrici

Re: [Vo]:ICCF24 proceedings uploaded

Thanks, Jed. That's a hell of a lot of reading. M. On Wednesday, May 1st, 2024 at 2:50 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > See: > > JOURNAL OF CONDENSED MATTER NUCLEAR SCIENCE > > Experiments and Methods in Cold Fusion > Proceedings of ICCF24 Solid State Energy Summit, Mountain View, California, > July 2

Re: [Vo]:New vaporizing effect discovered

Sorry! This is a kidding set of e-mails. Photons did always lead to evaporation of water since the earth is covered by water. Even more surprising is that ice does sublimate just from solar irradiation... So following such hoax science today is standard to diffuse a field by usst claiming so

Re: [Vo]:New vaporizing effect discovered

Nice to see someone else got around to discovering this effect. I observed this phenomenon 15 or 20 years ago, using a 532 nm laser. As these dorks will finally get around to discovering, this effect varies greatly with the refractive index of the material and the degree of polarity. Nitromethan

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's understanding of light in a vacuum vs the Michelson-Morley experiment

In the late 19th and early 20th century the physics community began to enshrine mathematical ingenuity as the best way to resolve the tensions between theory and experiment and grew increasingly dismissive of philosophical questioning and speculation. The theory of Special Relativity is typically

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's understanding of light in a vacuum vs the Michelson-Morley experiment

Faraday's message to Maxwell parallels Aristotle's complaint about the Egyptians. Aristotle implied words to the effect that the ancient Egyptians thought that the physical world should obey mathematics instead of math describing reality. There's a lot of that going on today. The so-called stan

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's understanding of light in a vacuum vs the Michelson-Morley experiment

Faraday wrote this 10 years before Maxwell published his first work on electromgnetism in 1856 which was titled "On Faraday's lines of Force" Maxwell's equations were first published in 1862. It seems Maxwell interpreted Faraday's writings in a manner that was consistent with an aether. I would s

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's understanding of light in a vacuum vs the Michelson-Morley experiment

Hmmm... A year after Maxwell's equations. Maxwell can't have been too happy about that, as his equations described the behavior of the aether. And he repeatedly claimed that he had merely expressed Faraday in conventional mathematical form. On Monday, April 15th, 2024 at 8:04 PM, MSF wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's understanding of light in a vacuum vs the Michelson-Morley experiment

This gives you an idea what a deep thinker Faraday was. Do you know if he posited this idea before Maxwell published his equations? I thought I had read everything Faraday wrote. Somehow I missed this one. MIchael On Monday, April 15th, 2024 at 12:08 PM, H L V wrote: > This is a quote from a l

Re: [Vo]:Nuclear waste

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 1 Apr 2024 22:56:25 +0200: Hi, [snip] >Uranium is at least 10'000x more harmless than Plutonium > Storing plutonium is wasteful anyway. Use it as fuel. >So its a bad idea... > > >J.W. > > >On 01.04.2024 21:10, Robin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Why not st

Re: [Vo]:Nuclear waste

Uranium is at least 10'000x more harmless than Plutonium So its a bad idea... J.W. On 01.04.2024 21:10, Robin wrote: Hi, Why not store nuclear waste in worked out Uranium mines? After all, "nuclear material" was stored there for billions of years before we dug it up. Crypto currency m

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's disc generator

If these two statements are logical implications of Maxwell's equations, a) A magnet that is not moving with respect to the aether will not have an electric field. b) A magnet that is moving at a constant velocity with respect to the aether will have an electric field. Then consider this thought

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's disc generator

The law of Faraday is very clear any change in magnetic flux induces charge hence a field. Many untrained physicists write j (current) instead of q what is wrong. To measure a current you have to cut the ring (rim) of charges what leads to dragging forces and movement of charge over e.g. a con

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's disc generator

The question of whether the magnetic field rotates in the faraday disc generator is a question that is related to aether theories in particular or any theory of privileged reference frames in general. It got me wondering if there are alternate ways to test for the presence of an aether or a privil

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's disc generator

As most might know, in physics we only know force fields. Thus so called field lines (magnet field) are equipotential cuts of the space covered by fields. Of course you never can draw such a line as all sources are in constant motion/rotation. The static magnetic field is a special case as it

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's disc generator

Sorry, the last word should be 'magnet' rather than 'magnetic'. harry On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:02 AM H L V wrote: > Another visualization of the behaviour of magnetic fields without the > concept of lines of force. > When the magnet is moved around it simply changes the orientation of all > th

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's disc generator

Another visualization of the behaviour of magnetic fields without the concept of lines of force. When the magnet is moved around it simply changes the orientation of all the little compass needles. The notion of lines of force tends to make one think the magnetic field is somehow mechanically atta

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's disc generator

Here is a physical demonstration of the situation using a ferrofluid. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bn41nPOGq-U The ferrofluid does not rotate with the cylindrical magnet, which supports the idea that the magnet's field does not rotate with the magnet. (There is a little bit of movement but the n

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's disc generator

It depends what you mean by a field. If you imagine the field is made of wire-like filaments which are fastened to an atom then you would expect the field to translate and rotate whenever the atom translates and rotates. On the other hand if you imagine the field is a vector field then the field ne

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's disc generator

In reply to H L V's message of Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:28:31 -0500: Hi, You don't need an experiment to figure this out. The field obviously rotates with the magnet. This is because the field is not a single entity. It is the sum of all the tiny fields created by the electrons attached to individual

Re: [Vo]:Faraday's disc generator

Instead of measuring voltages, another approach would be to measure how the entire assembly moves in response to the various relative rotations. In order to observe such effects, the entire assembly should be self contained so that it is free to slide over a level surface. The relative rotation of

Re: [Vo]:OT: AI generated video is progressing rapidly

I asked the Bot about F&P's original paper: https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanelectroche.pdf My questions were mainly about these two paragraphs: (a) Excess enthalpy generation is markedly dependent on the applied current density (i.e. magnitude of the shift in the chemical potential) and i

Re: [Vo]:OT: AI generated video is progressing rapidly

Document processing AI is also making progress. Adobe Acrobat just added a new feature, the AI Assistant. It works with documents in native Acrobat format, not a scanned document converted to Acrobat. I tried it with my book, but it said, "the feature only supports files with less than 120 pages."

Re: [Vo]:Nissan Leaf

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:12:40 -0500: Thanks Jed. [snip] >I do not think so. > >I had an older Leaf, which I gave to my daughter. I do not recall anything >like that. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk Buy electric cars and recharge them from solar panels on your roo

Re: [Vo]:Nissan Leaf

Robin wrote: Does anyone know if the original version of the Nissan Leaf, released in > 2010, had bi-directional charging capability? > I do not think so. I had an older Leaf, which I gave to my daughter. I do not recall anything like that.

Re: [Vo]:Van Allen belts

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:30:33 +0100: Hi, [snip] >No the earth is not at the magnetic radius. She is inside the tense >solar plasma flux. > >All mass is magnetic flux mass. E.g. the Bohr radius is the first >magnetic resonance radius. The second you get by mul

Re: [Vo]:Van Allen belts

No the earth is not at the magnetic radius. She is inside the tense solar plasma flux. All mass is magnetic flux mass. E.g. the Bohr radius is the first magnetic resonance radius. The second you get by multiplying it with (pi/alpha)^2. This you then can multiply with the sun's proton's number.

Re: [Vo]:Van Allen belts

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:02:25 +0100: Hi Jürg, Would you care to reply to the other questions? [snip] >You are correct! I made a Kopernikus turn and did look at the sun's belt > > >J.W. > >On 14.01.2024 19:53, Robin wrote: >> In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's

Re: [Vo]:Van Allen belts

You are correct! I made a Kopernikus turn and did look at the sun's belt J.W. On 14.01.2024 19:53, Robin wrote: In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 14 Jan 2024 06:43:05 +0100: Hi, [snip] That's the fact. The Van Allen belt is the magnetic resonance region (radius) of the SUN. Y

Re: [Vo]:Van Allen belts

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 14 Jan 2024 06:43:05 +0100: Hi, [snip] >That's the fact. The Van Allen belt is the magnetic resonance region >(radius) of the SUN. You can calculate it with the spherical metric for >magnetic mass. Same for the Galaxy MOND radius. I'm not quite sure

Re: [Vo]:Van Allen belts

That's the fact. The Van Allen belt is the magnetic resonance region (radius) of the SUN. You can calculate it with the spherical metric for magnetic mass. Same for the Galaxy MOND radius. J.W. On 13.01.2024 01:55, Robin wrote: Hi, Perhaps charged particles in the Van Allen belts are energ

Re: [Vo]:Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce energy and isotope gases

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:50:35 +0100: Hi, [snip] >There is only one physics = reality. >Santilli, Mills,Holmlid all see the same shrunken hydrogen. Without the H*/D* >step there is no CF/LENR. ...but they all have different explanations for it. :) >For certain

Re: [Vo]:Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce energy and isotope gases

Are you referring to the same reaction Prof. Leif Holmlid was talking about? There is only one physics = reality. Santilli, Mills,Holmlid all see the same shrunken hydrogen. Without the H*/D* step there is no CF/LENR. For certain coatings we see X-ray spectra in the range from 4keV..16keV (our

Re: [Vo]:Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce energy and isotope gases

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 3 Jan 2024 06:19:31 +0100: Hi, [snip] >Lock at the picture. Only the innermost kernel of thousands of protons >will possibly fuse or form H*-H*. H*-H* is an exothermic reaction nearly >delivering 500eV. Are you referring to the same reaction Prof. L

Re: [Vo]:Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce energy and isotope gases

Lock at the picture. Only the innermost kernel of thousands of protons will possibly fuse or form H*-H*. H*-H* is an exothermic reaction nearly delivering 500eV. The first step anyway is stripping of Oxigen! Of course much better science would be needed. But who wants to kill standard model

Re: [Vo]:Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce energy and isotope gases

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 3 Jan 2024 05:14:56 +0100: Hi, [snip] >What accelerating free electrons? > >This is a kind of hand waving. The bubble implodes so all momenta point >inwards. Heat will strip up the electrons what adds a further inward >momenta due to photon emission

Re: [Vo]:Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce energy and isotope gases

What accelerating free electrons? This is a kind of hand waving. The bubble implodes so all momenta point inwards. Heat will strip up the electrons what adds a further inward momenta due to photon emission (1/2 of this energy) . Impact speed is 7..10km/s. Crucial is that the electrons almost

Re: [Vo]:Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce energy and isotope gases

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 3 Jan 2024 02:36:56 +0100: Hi, [snip] >Factually the best update (2009) about sono fusion is given in :: >https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StringhamRwhenbubble.pdf > >J.W. Quote from the above paper: "The initially dense cluster is further compresse

Re: [Vo]:Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce energy and isotope gases

Factually the best update (2009) about sono fusion is given in :: https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StringhamRwhenbubble.pdf J.W. On 03.01.2024 00:37, Robin wrote: Hi, You might take a look at the work of Dr. Randell Mills (http://brilliantlightpower.com/). A severely shrunken H2 molecule wo

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >