This type of hot fusion has three problems that have not been solved
or even widely acknowledged.
1. The fusion is between D+T. The tritium must be created because it
is not a natural isotope. The plan is to convert the neutron flux into
tritium which is fed back into the reactor.
nuclear plant at Rongcheng.
Yes, China is on the front of many technologies now because the West
is captured by various self-interests that have no relationship to
general benefit.
Ed
—Jouni
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 25, 2013, at 1:54 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
wrote
On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Indeed,
However plasma physics is by itself interesting, so it is nice to
have
some big science experiments
. He tries to explain Rossi's reactor. See p.
18, table II. This context shows he's trying to explain CF and
Rossi's reactor.
2013/1/23 Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
This paper and many others like it describe how HOT fusion is
enhanced when it occurs in a chemical lattice. This study
. The only
difference it is that there are many, more than 2, incoming nuclei
to fuse. You cannot do that in experiments using colliders, it is
too unlikely. So, you cannot say that cold fusion is any different
than hot fusion that easily.
2013/1/25 Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Yes
by considering an arbitrarily high quantity of
particles, like quarks and gluons and whatever particle of the SM
you want. So, there is no rule restricting the number of bodies
taking part in the problem.
2013/1/25 Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
In any case, several basic rules MUST
and break the isotropy.
Regards
Fran
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:38 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Chemonuclear Transitions
The human mind is able to imagine endless possibilities. In order to
make any
Instead, I suggest you consult any physics text about the law of
conservation of momentum.
Ed
On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
No, we are certainly not. I let this Sisyphean task to Abd.
2013/1/25 Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Daniel, we are not communicating
these laws are seen by any one observer, then
they are true for all of the others. Do you see a hole in this
argument? How are the laws true for others but not for the one
ideally located?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
, everyone should read every
message before replying.
Ed
Proof of this assertion will be from this point forth since most of
those engaged in the current discussion will now understand the
issue of energy and momentum requirements.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms stor
!
I greatly honor your contributions to and knowledge of this
important field and I look forward to receiving additional guidance
from your inputs to vortex. We all appreciate the opportunity to
converse with you when you join us.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms stor
-
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Fri, Jan 25, 2013 12:12 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Chemonuclear Transitions
The problem with such exchanges is that the messages to different
people cross so that I have
, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 1:31 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Quantum mechanics lives in the realm of the wave. The electron will
exert it influence on the positive charge nucleus in bits and pieces.
Alex, you are using the wave model and I'm using the particle model
On Jan 25, 2013, at 3:49 PM, torulf.gr...@bredband.net torulf.gr...@bredband.net
wrote:
Excuse my grammar. English is not my native language.
I will try to answer your questions as simply as possible.
Can energy and momentum be transferred from the new He4 to another
nucleus at some
A truly scary prospect, I would say. Humans now have three ways they
could make themselves extinct - atomic weapons, biological weapons,
and smart computers. The list seems to be growing. What happens when
the smart computer is run by cold fusion so that it can never be
turned off?
Ed
Well Steven, as usual you cleverly identified another way humans will
become extinct. These activities will cause excessive sex from
boredom, which will require the computer to thin the population,
perhaps by an excessive amount using the other tools I mentioned.
Ed
On Jan 26, 2013, at
.
Ed
On Jan 26, 2013, at 9:05 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
A truly scary prospect, I would say. Humans now have three ways they
could make themselves extinct - atomic weapons, biological weapons,
and smart computers.
I do not see it that way. Nuclear
On Jan 26, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I agree Jed, you are correct if humans were rational.
They are, at times. If we were not rational, civilization and
technology would not exist.
Unfortunately, a significant fraction
On Jan 26, 2013, at 10:45 AM, a.ashfield wrote:
Interesting discussion. I have been writing about this for years
but it is good to see the main media is starting to pick it up. The
referenced article was rather unimaginative in places but noted the
basic question: “who is going buy all
On Jan 26, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Some LENR systems produce tritium and this decays into He3. Could a
LENR system be engineered to supply enough
He3 to make this sort of hot fusion practical
On Jan 26, 2013, at 12:45 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Ashfield:
... The referenced article was rather unimaginative in places but
noted the basic question: “who is going buy all these nice goodies
if they are unemployed?”
Precisely.
personal rant
IMHO, too many
Yes, Mark, this would be the best place to start. But jobs will be
lost, the only issue is which jobs. Congress does not want to cut any
jobs because these are voters. They only want to cut things that will
piss off the fewest number of people who vote. The poor do not vote so
they are
On Jan 26, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
No Steven, what you say is not the issue. The issue is that money
has been lent to the US in various forms and by various people and
they want their money back
On Jan 26, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Pollution is gradually being reduced.
Except in China and India, which is most of the world.
Pollution per dollar of GDP is down in both. China is making rapid
strides, adding nuclear and wind
amount of money, which people resist. Also, the debt
is much larger now. We have passed the point of no return according
to most analysts.
Ed
On Jan 26, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Debt is good within limits, Eric. The problem comes when
away and
came back with a report. The first real royal commission that we
have had in a long time
Nigel
On 26/01/2013 23:54, Edmund Storms wrote:
Sorry Jed, but your analysis conflicts with every economist that I
have read and I read many. Raising taxes back to Clayton is not
possible
Hi Frank,
Thanks for a copy of your book. I'm part way through and find it very
interesting.
As to your question, a financial collapse always affects different
people different ways depending where they live and their personal
financial situation. Generally, a skilled person who uses
Not just sad but scary because such an apparent lack of education is
revealed in the comments. We all agree that standards have been
lowered for both high-school and college degrees. As a result, many
graduates are qualified only for low skilled jobs. Consequently, a big
push is now
for this consultant was declined but I was offered all
the H-1b visas from India I wanted.
Literally.
Guess what ethnicity was of the guy in charge of that project?
The Fortune 500 is now taken over by India.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Not just sad
of being a US citizen.
My request for this consultant was declined but I was offered all
the H-1b visas from India I wanted.
Literally.
Guess what ethnicity was of the guy in charge of that project?
The Fortune 500 is now taken over by India.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Edmund Storms stor
From: Edmund Storms [stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:07 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Another article about the impact of automation on
employment
On Jan 29, 2013, at 10:57 AM, James Bowery wrote
On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ed Storms wrote:
Thanks Mark. Their view of reality differs significantly from what the
people I read describe. I tend to believe my people because they
predicted the 2008 collapse while Krugman did not. . . .
Krugman did predict it, and
I'm always amazed, no matter what the conclusion, someone can always
find evidence for the opposite. Here are some contrary opinions.
I expect the economic class has an influence and some fraction of any
population will always be well educated and some fraction will be
poorly educated.
to work there with an wage bellow what people with the same high
skill would get.
People come to the US for many reasons. But, I agree, a tendency
exists to pay them less than US citizens.
Ed
2013/1/29 Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
We all agree that standards have been lowered
is that this age of pessimism is going to end soon even
without LENR.
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Another article about the impact of automation on
employment
On Jan 29, 2013, at 1
to the
viability of Social Security. Automation is eliminating jobs at
such a rate that the payroll tax funding source may be in peril.
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 3:30 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Another article about
, but this effort also has basic limitations.
Nanotechnology will open new markets and, ironically, provide the
solution to making CF work. We just need to understand how to apply
it, which I'm trying to do.
Ed
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc
Dave, I hate to get involved in another debate war, but the climate
change issue is too important to ignore. The ice is melting world-wide
and the average temperature is increasing. The glaciers are melting
and the Arctic regon is losing ice. This fact is acknowledged by all
sides in the
start thinking in these terms
soon. I thought ahead and now live at 8500 feet. :-)
Ed
On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I believe, like many other people, that if the main caused is CO2
production, we are too late to stop
, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Jed, it is too late because no practical way exists to stop burning
fossil fuels.
I am sorry but this is nonsense. The Chinese are presently building
30 nuclear power reactors, and they are installing roughly that much
wind
homeowners think they are entitled to govt aid when they were too
stupid to just move.
-Mark
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 12:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:NHK: ocean levels may rise 9 m by 2100
Dave, I
On Jan 30, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
As you can see, the political will does not exist to do anything
heroic. The will is not even present to develop cold fusion, which
in any case would require years before it had any impact at all
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Wed, Jan 30, 2013 4:30 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:NHK: ocean levels may rise 9 m by 2100
You don't. You build dikes and pump out the water, aka Holland. But
you
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:45 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
No, Jed, it is not nonsense. It is simply a difference of opinion.
Yes, the Chinese are working hard to get energy. Meanwhile the
Japanese are burning more fossil fuel because they are afraid
the investment in the field will more than
likely be like a tsunami and advances will very likely occur at
breakneck speeds. That in my opinion is the way revolutions occur.
They seldom sneak up on anyone. More often they just sweep the
landscape.
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms
You are right, Chris, mankind is being confronted by a growing list of
basic problems. Deciding which one is the most important is hard. All
of them have the potential to cause massive pain and suffering. What
is worse, the nature of the problem is too technical and complex for
most
On Jan 31, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
What is worse, the nature of the problem is too technical and
complex for most people to understand.
In the past, all problems were too complex for anyone to understand.
In 1700 people did
On Jan 31, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Jan 31, 2013, at 8:54, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Take the mortgage melt down in 2008 and following, do you think
any intelligence was used by the financial industry. Yet these
people almost collapsed the financial system
Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Some of the world's smartest minds worked together to produce the
financial collapse. . . .
Does what you describe not represent stupid behavior?
Yes! It is both smart and stupid, at the same time. Most wars are
like that.
People who
Nice analysis, Craig. However, I think the wrong issues are being
discussed. I think we can agree and a wide range of date show that
the average temperature of the earth is going up, the ocean levels are
rising, and the pH the ocean is shifting in a more acid direction.
All of these
Lawry, I agree such a statement is required and I have created many
variations. Such a statement is only effective when it is targeted to
a particular audience. Obviously, a Congressman requires a different
approach compared to an educated scientist. Consequently, a variety
of statements
David,
I have not been following your evaluation closely, but I have done a
lot of calorimetry in my life. The ONLY way a calorimeter can be
tested is to use it without any source of excess energy being present.
That means you need to run the calorimeter in the planned way with the
. This is my result so far. Tomorrow, I am hoping that things
will change toward the other direction. I am confident that you are
aware that I am seeking confirmation of LENR activity. It is
unusual for me to behave as a skeptic.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms stor
firmly established by now
that virtually everyone with any degree of credibility agrees?
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
David,
I have not been following your evaluation closely, but I have done a
lot of calorimetry in my life. The ONLY way
Well said James. We have three other companies claiming to have
commercial generators of power. Each of these claims is based on
dubious demonstrations. What is the Miley claim based on? Can we
expect his claim to be debated and examined in the way the Rossi claim
has experienced? Just
regardless of its demonstrated lack of reality?
Ed
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
We have three other companies claiming to have commercial generators
of power. Each of these claims is based on dubious demonstrations.
What is the Miley
, this will not reflect well on our objectivity.
Ed
On Feb 8, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
The sarcasm is appreciated, Jed.
I am glad someone recognizes it as such.
But seriously, are we in the field free to propose money be spent on
any claim
not pitch your proposed research program so we can vote
with a clear conscience?
https://ultralight.wufoo.com/forms/future-energy-application-form/
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Yes, by all means give George a chance to be heard. Nevertheless, I
On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
Hi,
On 8-2-2013 22:38, Edmund Storms wrote:
Yes, by all means give George a chance to be heard. Nevertheless, I
think that all proposals need to be treated with the same level of
skepticism. Rossi, for example, is required to PROVE his
Chuck, consider these issues. First, the BEC between atoms has not
been shown to occur except near absolute zero. The claim for such a
structure between hypothetical particles based on a form of
concentrated energy within a structure really does not apply. Second.
once a BEC forms, why
On Feb 9, 2013, at 3:58 AM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
Hi,
On 9-2-2013 1:19, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
I disagree, I think Andrea already did prove his claims. The
problem is only that almost nobody seems to understand what is
going on.
So Rob
The problem Eric is that once the math is solved, the expected nuclear
reaction is hot fusion, not cold fusion. Consequently, this effort is
a waste of time. This is something the hot fusion field needs to
understand to explain the effect of bombarding materials with
energetic deuterons.
Lou,
Any theory that proposes to use tunneling based on electrons being
concentrated must at the same time show how the resulting energy is
dissipated. Such energy is dissipated normally by the fusion product
breaking into two parts, which go off with high energy in directions
required
as gamma rays.
I have no idea what you are describing by the above comment.
Ed
Cheers: Axil
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Lou,
Any theory that proposes to use tunneling based on electrons being
concentrated must at the same time show how
the process works.
Ed
On Feb 10, 2013, at 3:54 AM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com via eskimo.com
11:45 AM (15 hours ago)
to vortex-l
Edmund Storms writes:
Yes, but all of these processes you describe are done near absolute
zero while using complex apparatus
http://repository.ias.ac.in/64627/1/10-pub.pdf
works better
2013/2/10 Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com via eskimo.com
11:45 AM (15 hours ago)
to vortex-l
Edmund Storms writes:
Yes, but all of these processes you describe are done near absolute
zero while
the basis of my naive understanding the BEC concepts
for LERN. No doubt there is much more to learn and discover.
Best Regards,
Chuck
-
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Chuck, consider these issues. First, the BEC between atoms has not
been
if millions or billions of fusions took
place. So yes, it's hot fusion; and yes, it's cold fusion. It's
nanofusion.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Chuck, we have three separate and independent questions here. First,
can a BEC based
Please remember, we are discussing two entirely different reactions.
Hot fusion does not care about the temperature or nature of the
general environment. Only the energy of individual deuterons matters.
The result are fragments of helium. This reaction was initiated in
plasma produced by
On Feb 10, 2013, at 8:20 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
NO!!! That is not the issue Cold fusion produces He4 without
radiation.
***There have been some observances of radiation. Not very much,
but some.
Yes, I
On Feb 10, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Feb 10, 2013, at 8:20 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Storms
, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Feb 10, 2013, at 8:20 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Storms: NO!!! That is not the issue Cold fusion produces He4
without radiation.
KevinO:***There have been some
On Feb 11, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
In the case of cold fusion, the process does not produce energetic
products and the final product is an intact helium nucleus.
Nevertheless, the nuclear
Eric, there seems to be confusion about how energy is measured and how
it is applied. Let's say that the electron identified as a k shell is
removed by adding 20 keV. The source of this energy is not important.
I assumed it resulted from electron bombardment and you assume it
comes from
On Feb 11, 2013, at 9:48 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
In either case, the deuteron does not move. The energy goes into
the electron that is ejected well away from the atom. When it
returns, a 20 keV photon is emitted
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Chuck, we have three separate and independent questions here. First,
can a BEC based on atoms form in a lattice at room temperature. In
spite of Kim, theory says this is not possible. Second, can such a
cluster lead
The papers were posted to vortex and to an e-mail by Jed just a few
minutes ago.
Ed
On Feb 12, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
As for my theory, I find that most people do not understand what
I'm
many
times and it simply adds energy to the process. Energy can be added
by increased temperature and application of applied current, which
also increases the power. This changes nothing basic about the
process nor reveals how the process works.
Ed
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Edmund
this, the D nuclei must form a relationship within a
structure (cluster) that is unique. Perhaps the BEC has the required
properties, but this is not obvious based on the arguments made so far.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Date: February 12, 2013 3:29:09
So, you accept reality as Sinha describes it. That simplifies out
discussion because now we only need to learn from Sinha.
Ed
On Feb 12, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
I know how lasers can be used to cool. That is not how lasers are
used when they are applied to cold fusion.
:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
There is no alpha. The helium CAN NOT MOVE spontaneously. The helium
contains extra energy as mass. This mass must be converted to energy
before it can appear as reaction energy. The He is fixed in space
I would like to provide some advice to people attempting to explain
LENR. This advice comes from someone who has studied the subject for
the 23 years, who has an extensive background in chemistry and
physics, and who has read almost every paper about the subject. I
believe new ideas in
will occur.
I think maybe a hybrid of Chubbs' and Kim's theory could be very
compelling. Specifically with the Nano scale BECs or 100 atom Bose-
band states.
Best Regards,
Chuck
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Eric, the details do not matter. The basic
.
arxiv.org/pdf/1210.7086
I have posted on this elsewhere.Cheers: Axil
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:19 AM, Chuck Sites wrote:
I think you are being very dismissive of the way quantum mechanics
works with in the nuclear
Unfortunately, he has no idea were the energy resulting from cold
fusion comes from. He puts this phenomenon in the category of
perpetual motion. What else has he misinterpreted?
Ed
On Feb 14, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Rupert Sheldrake is sometimes annoying to conventional
described, a new idea in physics.
Much of Ed's full theory is still circumstantial as to the
problematic part, the assertion of a mechanism to explain the
draining process. However, Ed does not do this in this paper, so I
will set that issue aside, at least at first.
At 08:38 PM 2/13/2013, Edmund
I have always been interested in how people describe a Creator. Are
you claiming that the universe resulted from some super intelligent
life-form getting the idea that a new universe would be an interesting
project and then set about creating it? Or is the idea of a creator
an abstract
:
The laws of physics derive from a slight alteration of the perfect
symmetry of nothing. Symmetry is the most fundamental principle of
natural law. No much space for patchwork universe there.
Giovanni
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I have always
Yes, but more exactly a trial-and-errorist.
On Feb 15, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
In other words your God is an experimentalist., or what you call
Nature.
Harry
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I agree, but as has been noted many
in a defensible, scientific way.
Of course, this kind of sensibility and rationality please no one -
the
evangelicals hate it more so than the atheists... which probably
means it is
as correct as human mentality can imagine.
From: Edmund Storms
I have always
Here you and I agree. I just is!! But what is it? The universe is
not designed for us. We are temporary inhabants just like the
dinosaurs and millions of other life-forms. What is the universe
designed to do? I believe it is designed to acquire awareness. The
awareness starts in the
I added the following comment:
The experimental approach and the intention for applying LENR in space
should be be admired. The problem is with the theory being explored.
This theory is flawed in so many ways, all of which have been well
explained in published papers, that I’m amazed that
be able to set them
straight, but that will not happen if they give up too soon.
Encourage them in any way that you can for now.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Fri, Feb
But Eric, this is not how experimental studies work. Generally people
see what they look for. For example, Swartz has a model he uses to
explain what he see and he explains the behavior only in this way.
Fleischmann had a model based on Preparata that provided his guidance,
which lead to
fingers
crossed that at least one of the many cells that they are testing
will not match our expectations.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Sat, Feb 16, 2013 9:25 am
Subject: Re
What is so unusual about this video? The meteor exploded, which sent
fragments in all directions, including straight ahead as the video
shows. As for shooting down an object slowing from 17000 mph in the
atmosphere, where is the common sense?
Ed
On Feb 17, 2013, at 7:17 AM, Jones Beene
it is
hard for such a large shockwave to go unreported if the meteor
enters over land, and by taking into account the fraction of Earth's
surface that is land we can increase the expected frequency only a
few fold at best.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Edmund Storms
stor
Please apply some common sense. The object was too small to detect
and was totally unexpected. Even if it was detected with enough time
to launch a missile, why do this?
Ed
On Feb 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:16 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
I agree, no theory will cause a Western government to provide funds
for LENR research for the reasons John states in the article. However,
a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and
created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will.
This
This speculation would be fun if some people were not serious.
On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Like Tunguska, it was an alien sacrifice:
http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/6868/56
601 - 700 of 1275 matches
Mail list logo
