General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Yes the answer is not. But the question is one of great interest to me, and
I'm interested in learning from others experience on the topic.
ON our network our biggest focus right now is to improve the methods to
shorten time and im
ntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 3:14 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
So that's a no then Tom ;)
Using various
idged solution for delay/jitter?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: 13 June 2006 13:26
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Paul Hendry wrote:
>We too have been looking at moving from routed to
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Answer #1: Thats debatable. Do you not recall year 2000. 26 of the
largest 29 telecom companies filed for Bankruptcy.
Name brand ment bankrupt. Even for Cisco! Lets not forget who the
largest investor was in Cogent, now Cisco's owned network.
Back then folks were building
of uncertainty.
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 3:14 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
So that&
s very possible to set-up a test environment
that isn't too far of real world. Anyone else tested?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: 14 June 2006 03:13
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
t;
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:02 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
The delay in switching a packet at hardware is less than the delay in
routing a packet at software. This is 1 of the reasons that Cisco created
the G"S"R and why an MPL"S" switched network is
Original Message -
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
I disagree that many providers have used open source to their advantage.
Certainly, many providers
ss Broadband
- Original Message - From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Charles Wu wrote:
It is worth noting that you lose the benefits of routing
pro
dDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Charles Wu wrote:
It is
ot;
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:22 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
It is worth noting that you lose the benefits of routing protocols when you
bridge your network
Sure, there's always RSTP... (heh)
Many larger wireless / Wifi based architecture these days seem to be
favorin
-837-3790 x 151
989-837-3780 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mercury.net
129 Ashman St, Midland, MI 48640
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hendry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:03 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking f
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: 13 June 2006 13:26
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Paul Hendry wrote:
>We too have been looking at moving from routed to a switched Mikrotik for
>t
om: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
> Paul Hendry wrote:
>
> >We too have been looking at moving from routed to a switched Mikrotik for
> >t
Paul Hendry wrote:
We too have been looking at moving from routed to a switched Mikrotik for
the core network but the unknown quantity seems to be if there are any
latency or speed issues related to the move. A "true" switched network is
faster than a routed network as the switching is done at a
, June 12, 2006 11:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
We just completed converting our network from routed to bridged. Where each
AP (we run Mikrotik) used to do its own DHCP and PPPoE to customers and
speak OSPF to the network, the APs (still Mikrotik) now bridge
level
but in Mikrotik I believe both switching and routed is done in software.
What have you seen?
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Sovereen
Sent: 13 June 2006 04:12
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a devic
Charles Wu wrote:
It is worth noting that you lose the benefits of routing protocols when you
bridge your network
The above is the number one reason against using VLANs for layer 2
transport. A second important issue to consider is management. Every
device from end-to-end where you want to
o far.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:22 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
It is worth noting that you lose the benefits of routing protocols wh
Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 5:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
An example of where its useful is... What if a customer has multiple
locations in a Wide Area PtMP topology, and wants the data seperated? What
if the Customer is another term for
arles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 5:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
06 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Lets say you are using vlans to not only segment traffic, but priortize
traffic as well. So a double tagged vlan, would give you the ability to
create A vlan for segmentation and a VLAN within that vlan for
priortization, for additional segm
"WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 3:02 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
AirmatrixOS is not starOS and does offer vlans. Its its own web based OS.
You can order their stuff with starOS, but that's really only specific
custoemrs that order it anymore.
alternate solutions that can be delivered today.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 3:06 PM
Subject: Re:
ED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 11:34 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
Google (or Cisco) is your friend
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_
guid
e09186a00801f0f4a.html
-Charles
The key ideas here is abilty to creaetequivelent of virtual circuits
of Ethernet.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Se
Lets say you are using vlans to not only segment traffic, but priortize
traffic as well. So a double tagged vlan, would give you the ability to
create A vlan for segmentation and a VLAN within that vlan for
priortization, for additional segmentation as well.
I could be wrong though.
-
Jeff
O
ge you by the
> minute, but not at a rate any higher than Cisco would charge you.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: &qu
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: 09 June 2006 21:18
To: WISPA General List
Subject: layer 2 transport (was Re: [WISPA] looking for a device)
John Scrivner wrote:
> Can anyone describe any functional and/or technical differences
> between
John Scrivner wrote:
Can anyone describe any functional and/or technical differences
between VLANs and say MPLS or Mikrotik's EoIP? It sounds to me like
all three are functional equivalents of each other. Please correct me
if this is an incorrect assumption. I have Googled it so spare me the
John Scrivner wrote:
> Can anyone describe any functional and/or technical differences between
> VLANs and say MPLS or Mikrotik's EoIP? It sounds to me like all three
> are functional equivalents of each other. Please correct me if this is
> an incorrect assumption. I have Googled it so spare me t
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 11:34 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
Google (or Cisco) is your friend
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/
MikroTik supports this, correct?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Rogers
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 11:52 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
It is also referred as 802.1q tagging... If it
o: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
Google (or Cisco) is your friend
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_
guid
e09186a00801f0f4a.html
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
h
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:39 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Can you or someone explain what double VLAN is? I have never heard of
such a thing. How can it be used to help us?
Thanks,
Scriv
>
> Yo may w
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:10 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
Virtual LAN. Imagine segregating segments of your network across a backhaul
pipe so that they f
0-307-4000 Cell
260-918-4340 VoIP
www.oibw.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:39 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Can you or someone
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, John Scrivner wrote:
Can you or someone explain what double VLAN is? I have never heard of such a
thing. How can it be used to help us?
Not having read the entire thread, I'm assuming the term "double
VLAN" refers to the ability to create a VLAN (or many) that each
have V
QinQ?
-Matt
John Scrivner wrote:
Can you or someone explain what double VLAN is? I have never heard of
such a thing. How can it be used to help us?
Thanks,
Scriv
Yo may want to look at Alvarion. Alvarion does support VLAN. new
Firmware4 supports double VLAN also.
Alvarion used to have one
SPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Can you or someone explain what double VLAN is? I have never heard of
such a thing. How can it be used to help us?
Thanks,
Scriv
Yo may want to look at Alvarion. Alvarion does support VLAN. new
Firmware4 supports double VLAN also.
A
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:39 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Can you or someone explain what double VLAN is? I have never heard of
such a thing. How can it be used to help us?
Thanks,
Scr
Can you or someone explain what double VLAN is? I have never heard of
such a thing. How can it be used to help us?
Thanks,
Scriv
Yo may want to look at Alvarion. Alvarion does support VLAN. new
Firmware4 supports double VLAN also.
Alvarion used to have one model that was designed to have a se
ehalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 11:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
There are people that build them for you.
MIkrotik sells pre-made systems.
WISP-Router I thought also did, but not possitive.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:06 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] looking for a device
Hi Matt,
To throw in a dose of realism -- even if you roll your own Mikrotik solution
- it will most likely cost you more than the $300-60
t not at a rate any higher than Cisco would charge you.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 2:00 PM
"WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
I am looking for a device I can buy that does all of this out of the
box. I don't want to build my own since I need 30-40 of them in the next
30 days.
-Matt
Sam Tetherow wr
band
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Mikrotik on a routerboard 532 should do the trick although I haven't
messed wit
Sounds like Mikrotik to me. We do that all the time.
Take note, to get standard bridge features across an 802.11 client, it
requires WDS. Mikrotik allows for large packets so that VLANs can be
configured over WDS.
The configuration is a bit encumbersome at first, but we got it down to a
prett
eofast dot net
> Fast Internet, NO WIRES!
>
> -
> - Original Message -
> From: "jeffrey thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List" ; "WISPA General List"
>
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a d
!
-
- Original Message -
From: "jeffrey thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" ; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
&
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Matt Liotta
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:54 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
>
> I understand you are suggesting I would
Charles Wu wrote:
The bits and pieces will definitely fit in your budget (in this case, $500),
but keep in mind, integration, development, support etc adds a lot to the
"top line"
Remember, most manufacturers are selling products at 40-60% gross margin
Well sure, but if a manufacturer can't
Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 2:20 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
-Matt
Charles Wu wrote:
>Hi Matt,
>
>To th
s
> ===
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "jeffrey thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List" ; "WISPA General List"
>
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] lookin
t, etc)
> >
> >-Charles
> >
> >---
> >CWLab
> >Technology Architects
> >http://www.cwlab.com
> >
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
I would expect the devices to cost somewhere between $300 and $600 each.
As far as support goes, I would expect it to be similar to other low
cost radio vendors like Trango, etc.
-Matt
Sam Tetherow wrote:
What are you will
Some assembly required. We do not put the antenna pieces together
since the user would have to take them apart to attach the cat5.
Lonnie
On 6/8/06, George Rogato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have to take that back. I'm not so sure they are already assembled and
ready to go.
They might fall un
: [WISPA] looking for a device
I would expect the devices to cost somewhere between $300 and $600 each.
As far as support goes, I would expect it to be similar to other low
cost radio vendors like Trango, etc.
-Matt
Sam Tetherow wrote:
> What are you willing to pay and what are your supp
Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
I would expect the devices to cost somewhere between $300 and $600 each.
As far as support goes, I would expect it to be similar to other low
cost radio vendors like Trango, etc.
-Matt
Sam Tetherow wrote:
> What ar
ist" ; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
Fyi everyone, wrap boards have been discontinued
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:45:00 -0500, "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> If you order it all from
I would expect the devices to cost somewhere between $300 and $600 each.
As far as support goes, I would expect it to be similar to other low
cost radio vendors like Trango, etc.
-Matt
Sam Tetherow wrote:
What are you willing to pay and what are your support requirements?
Sam Tetherow
I have to take that back. I'm not so sure they are already assembled and
ready to go.
They might fall under "some assembly required"
Maybe Lonnie can tell us.
George
George Rogato wrote:
Lonnie sells his war in a rootenna waiting to go.
Support is offered via the online forums.
George
Matt
What are you willing to pay and what are your support requirements?
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Matt Liotta wrote:
I understand you are suggesting I wouldn't have to psychically build
the devices, but that isn't what I am worried about. I want an
off-the-shelf product that is suppor
Lonnie sells his war in a rootenna waiting to go.
Support is offered via the online forums.
George
Matt Liotta wrote:
I understand you are suggesting I wouldn't have to psychically build the
devices, but that isn't what I am worried about. I want an off-the-shelf
product that is supported by a
I could be missing the product you are suggesting, but the only dual
radio products I can find our base station products. I not looking for a
base station, I am looking for something client facing. Further, I see
no mention of VLAN support.
-Matt
jeffrey thomas wrote:
Airmatrix can do that.
Fyi everyone, wrap boards have been discontinued
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:45:00 -0500, "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> If you order it all from wisp-router they will assemble it for your so
> you would get a die-cast case with the RB mounted the radios and
> pigtails installed. All yo
I understand you are suggesting I wouldn't have to psychically build the
devices, but that isn't what I am worried about. I want an off-the-shelf
product that is supported by a vendor. That includes it being pre-built,
software installed, and support available.
-Matt
Sam Tetherow wrote:
If y
Airmatrix can do that.
www.defactowireless.com
On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:17:30 -0400, "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> I am looking for a device with the following requirements:
>
> * Can backhaul at >11Mbps operating in the 5.2Ghz band
> * Can support VLANs
> * Can assign a VLAN to one E
If you order it all from wisp-router they will assemble it for your so
you would get a die-cast case with the RB mounted the radios and
pigtails installed. All you would need to do is set up the software end
of things, which could be done with a script once you have the initial
setup done. On
I am looking for a device I can buy that does all of this out of the
box. I don't want to build my own since I need 30-40 of them in the next
30 days.
-Matt
Sam Tetherow wrote:
Mikrotik on a routerboard 532 should do the trick although I haven't
messed with the VLAN stuff.
I am not a StarOS
uhh, mikrotik w/SR2, SR5, 5 gig antenna for backhaul and 2.4 omni on the
other...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] looking for a device
I am looking
Mikrotik on a routerboard 532 should do the trick although I haven't
messed with the VLAN stuff.
I am not a StarOS user, but I would bet that a StarOS setup on either a
WRAP or WAR board would work
as well.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Matt Liotta wrote:
I am looking for a device wi
72 matches
Mail list logo
